Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #560396 > unrolled thread

9/11 video- CIA operative spills all

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:21 -0800
    9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:02 -0800
      9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:16 -0800
        9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:44 -0800
      Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-08 20:21 +0000
        Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0800
          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-08 20:53 +0000
            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 23:00 -0500
              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 06:51 -0800
                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:11 -0500
              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-09 17:36 +0000
                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 10:34 -0800
                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-09 19:45 +0000
                  hoo-yoo noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:22 -0800
          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 12:53 -0800
            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 13:01 -0800
              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-08 21:43 +0000
                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 14:00 -0800
                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 14:09 -0800
                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:34 -0600
          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:37 -0600
            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 17:22 -0800
              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-09 02:31 +0000
                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 19:05 -0800
                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 19:32 -0800
                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:25 -0600
                      Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 06:42 -0800
                        Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 09:05 -0600
                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 07:08 -0800
                            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 09:27 -0600
                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:19 -0800
                                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:32 -0600
                                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 14:57 -0600
                                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:04 -0800
                                      Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 03:46 -0800
                                        Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:35 -0600
                                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:37 -0800
                                            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 21:45 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 23:27 -0800
                                                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 23:42 -0800
                                                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 09:40 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 03:07 -0800
                                                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 12:10 -0500
                                                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 09:31 -0800
                                                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 09:57 -0800
                                                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 16:46 -0500
                                      Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:23 -0600
                                        Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 05:44 -0800
                                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:49 -0600
                                            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 05:57 -0800
                                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:15 -0600
                                                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 10:24 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:19 -0600
                                                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 06:50 -0800
                                                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:57 -0600
                                                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 10:19 -0500
                                                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:22 -0800
                                                      Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 11:41 -0600
                                                  Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-11 16:04 +0000
                                                    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:25 -0800
                                                      Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 11:08 -0600
                                                        Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 09:16 -0800
                                                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 01:17 -0500
                                                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 13:55 -0500
                                                            march first noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 12:11 -0700
                                                Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 10:22 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 12:49 -0800
                                            Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 10:39 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:30 -0800
                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:13 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 07:11 -0800
                          Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:14 -0500
              Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:17 -0600
    Re: 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:36 -0600

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#560396 — 9/11 video- CIA operative spills all

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAawF22QUMs&sns=em

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#560411

Susan Lindauer's new book "Extreme Prejudice"
lays 9/11 at the feet of 3 people-
you know who they are.
They hung Hussein, didn't they?
Time for justice for Bush and Cheney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560422

Sorry- that should have said "hanged".
We must be correct.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560436

Gonna be so many whistle-blowers, soon,
that someone we know is going to get
some long-deserved justice.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560460

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Susan Lindauer's new book "Extreme Prejudice"
>lays 9/11 at the feet of 3 people-
>you know who they are.

Osama bin Laden
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

The third??  I don't know, Mohammed Atta?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560468

Didn't watch, Micky?
Not surprised.
Bush
Cheney
Haldeman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560485

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Didn't watch, Micky?
>Not surprised.

If I watched every 9/11 kOOkvid out there, I'd be doing nothing else.
Remember, all those kOOkvids are merely the opinions of the authors who
created them, all fancied up to get suckers to believe them.

>Bush
>Cheney
>Haldeman

Haldeman? Not the Watergate crook, I take it.  He died in 1993.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560632

On 03/08/2016 03:53 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:
>
>> Didn't watch, Micky?
>> Not surprised.
>
> If I watched every 9/11 kOOkvid out there, I'd be doing nothing else.
> Remember, all those kOOkvids are merely the opinions of the authors who
> created them, all fancied up to get suckers to believe them.
>
>> Bush
>> Cheney
>> Haldeman
>
> Haldeman? Not the Watergate crook, I take it.  He died in 1993.
>
You are the irrational kook for thinking governments and politicians 
always tell the truth. You are a born Clintoon supporter.

The sucker is you for believing the bullshit that building 7 just got so 
heartbroken seeing it's two buddies go down that it just had to collapse 
itself. Science says that's what happens when buildings get depressed.

Mike Moron, you are JUST the kind of gullible guy that the current crop 
of presidential candidates are looking for!

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html

HVAC is here to try to cover up all the embarrassing facts of 9/11 and 
other so-called "attacks". If you don't accept his every word, he will 
call you names. Scared yet?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560749

BJ quacked
You are the irrational kook for thinking governments and politicians 
always tell the truth. You are a born Clintoon supporter. 

The sucker is you for believing the bullshit that building 7 just got so 
heartbroken seeing it's two buddies go down that it just had to collapse 
itself. Science says that's what happens when buildings get depressed. 
-------------

Argumentum ad absurdum is the hallmark of the kook. When you mix it with a strawman you get BJ

Of course the kook doesn't even realize it's absurd. BJ feels that this is a rational argument

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560808

On 03/09/2016 09:51 AM, HVAC wrote the lies:
> BJ quacked
> You are the irrational kook for thinking governments and politicians
> always tell the truth. You are a born Clintoon supporter.
>
> The sucker is you for believing the bullshit that building 7 just got so
> heartbroken seeing it's two buddies go down that it just had to collapse
> itself. Science says that's what happens when buildings get depressed.
> -------------
>
> Argumentum ad absurdum is the hallmark of the kook. When you mix it with a strawman you get BJ
>
> Of course the kook doesn't even realize it's absurd. BJ feels that this is a rational argument
>
I wasn't speaking to you, asshole. No offense.

Hey did you read about building 7? of course you didn't. You are 
determined to stay ignorant so you can lie without guilt. (Not that 
atheists have any guilt anyway)  Tell us again how official versions are 
never wrong. Tell us again how when buildings get "sad" they fall down. 
You are a moron. No offense.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560831

benj <nobody@gmail.com> writes:

>The sucker is you for believing the bullshit that building 7 just got so 
>heartbroken seeing it's two buddies go down that it just had to collapse 
>itself. Science says that's what happens when buildings get depressed.

>Mike Moron, you are JUST the kind of gullible guy that the current crop 
>of presidential candidates are looking for!

>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html

Funny you mentioned that page.  It's one of a few sites that convinced
me that the 9/11 "Truthers" in general, and the Building 7 kooks in
particular, are outright lying to get people to believe a false alternate
reality for some reason.  For example, such sites love to point out that
Building 7 was never damaged by any airliner.  OK, but they miss the fact
that a tower collapsed dropping pieces of itself from 110 floors up on
it, apparently leaving a HUGE gouge in the south face of 7.  And "small
fires": Googling find videos of an entire lower floor of 7 fully involved
with the floor below it with all the windows busted out and blackened,
it looks like it may have been fully involved as well but burned out.
And FDNY clearing people away so the building 7 could collapse? Well,
yeah, they ran a transit on it and saw it wasn't quite straight anymore
and after losing so many in the towers, the decided they weren't about
to be fooled for a third time and got everyone away.

On 9/11, I remember hearing on the news how a third building suddenly
collapsed and I thought WTF?.  Some time later I came across a Building
7 conspiracy page and I thought "yeah, what the hell happened with that?
It wasn't hit." remembering my earlier WTF thoughts.  But the more I read
Building 7 conspiracy pages, the more I saw evasion, half-truths and
one-sided discussions, and the more I realized I was being lied to, by
those claiming to expose the lies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560852

Mainstream not mentioning 7 wasn't evasive?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560886

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Mainstream not mentioning 7 wasn't evasive?

Huh?  I just said I heard on 9/11 how a third building collapsed, and was
thinking WTF?.

While the collapse of 7 would be a huge news story in isolation, as part
of the bigger 9/11 story it was a building hardly anyone had heard of with
no injuries vs. the destruction of an iconic symbol of NYC where almost
3000 people died. Nobody really cared about several other buildings
destroyed or damaged beyond repair either.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#561384 — hoo-yoo

w.t.c7 was very impprtant to the site,
structurally

> Mainstream not mentioning 7 wasn't evasive?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560486

What's going on in Libya?
Oh- they got gold and oil, so
the US are supporting the jihadist/sharia
rebels cause they want the gold and oil

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560492

That was the CIA "asset" that was directly
bargaining with Iraq about WMD and
the sanctions.
If you didn't read/watch the material,
why would you comment, you
ignorant twat?
The 'Tard Gang- Odd, Mickey, and HVAC!

Rub-a-dub-dub
(HVAC will love this)
Three men in a tub
The butcher, the Baker, and the candlestick 
maker
:)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560512

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>If you didn't read/watch the material,
>why would you comment, you
>ignorant twat?

While some 9/11 kOOkvids are entertaining because they can reveal the
amazing depth of stupidity of those who actually believe in them, the vast
majority are vacuous and vapid mindless droning which makes me wonder if
their actual purpose is to brainwash watchers into becoming sheeple
followers of the 9/11 "movement" or something.  Or they're obsessing over 
a MPEG artifact or something.

Promise me that this particular kOOkvid will be entertaining, in that
I'll be amazed at the absurdity of the claims it makes, or the stupidity 
of those who actually believe it or something, and I'll watch it. Extra
credit knowing that YOU believe it!
I'm not interested in a hypnosis video.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560517

You'll be amazed.
This lady was the second person
charged under the Patriot Act.
She was the direct contact between
Iraq and the USA.
The Feds claimed she was insane
and wanted a judge's permission to
chemically lobotomize her.
She's dangerous- to them

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560523

#3 Rumsfeld, not Haldeman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560567

On 3/8/2016 4:00 PM, john wrote:
> You'll be amazed.
> This lady was the second person
> charged under the Patriot Act.

The above is fact.

> She was the direct contact between
> Iraq and the USA.

The above is claimed but not fact.

> The Feds claimed she was insane
> and wanted a judge's permission to
> chemically lobotomize her.

Sorry, but a court-appointed psychiatrist declared her unfit to stand trial.

> She's dangerous- to them
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web