Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #559145 > unrolled thread

And the news about Greenland just keeps getting worse.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  And the news about Greenland just keeps getting worse. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 23:52 -0500
    Re: And the news about Greenland just keeps getting worse. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 07:34 +0100
      Re: And the news about Greenland just keeps getting worse. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:37 -0800

#559145 — And the news about Greenland just keeps getting worse.

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/news-events/greenlands-ice-getting-darker-increasing-risk-melting

(KoOkFrOth torrent coming in 3...2...1...)

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#559155

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0ki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:nbb4b6$1eij$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/news-events/greenlands-ice-getting-darker-increasing-risk-melting

Disingenuous research at best, fraudulent at worst.

<http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/news-events/greenlands-ice-getting-darker-increasing-risk-melting>
================================================================
A likely cause for the large shift around 1996 was a change in
atmospheric circulation, Tedesco said. The North Atlantic Oscillation,
a large-scale natural weather cycle, went into a phase in which summer
atmospheric conditions favored more incoming solar radiation and
warmer, moist air from the south. Later records show those conditions
shifted in 2013-2014 to favor less melting, but the damage was already
done – the ice sheet had become more sensitive. In 2015, melting
spiked again to reach more than half of the Greenland  ice sheet.
================================================================
*Not* due to "zOMG! Antheorpoomorfic Glaooobaeil Wairming!
DDUUURRRHHH!".

The NAO is a natural change in circulation patterns. It's been
predominantly positive since ~2007.

<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/Winter-NAO-Index.svg/708px-Winter-NAO-Index.svg.png>
Note the average.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_oscillation>
"Under a positive NAO index (NAO+), regional reduction in atmospheric
pressure results in a regional rise in sea level due to the 'inverse
barometer effect'."

So your Klimate Katastrophe Kooks bleating about sea level rise in
that region are doing nothing but bleating alarmist propaganda.

Remember, you kooktards manipulated the temperature sensor data upward
significantly in Greenland, as well as many other regions:

Message-ID: <e5c09fdb5c8d5c44bfe7b400668a5b1f@dizum.com>
================================================================
The proof of data manipulation, each chart had its underlying data
changed from either no trend or a cooling trend to a strong warming
trend. If the changes had been due to Heat Island Effect, the changes
would have caused the temperatures to be adjusted *cooler*, not
warmer.

And the spankard LunkHead can't refute that proof of data
manipulation, which is why he snipped it out and ran away from it.

Mariscal:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/marisgif_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

San Juan Bautista / Misiones:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/sangif_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Puerto Casado:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/puegif_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Pilar:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/pilar_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Pedro Juan Ca
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/juan_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Concepcion:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/concepcion_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Asuncion/Aero:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/asuncion_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

San Juan Baut:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/sanjuan_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Encarnacion:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/encarnacion_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Greenland - Godthab Nuuk:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/nuuk_thumb.gif?w=500&h=342>

Iceland - Akureyri:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/akureyri_thumb.gif?w=500&h=342>

Russia - Ostrov Dikson:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/ostrov_thumb.gif?w=500&h=335>

California - San Diego/Lin:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/sand_thumb_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Australia - Alice Springs:
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/alice_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Ireland - Valentia Obse (adjusted upward considerably, despite the
underlying unmanipulated data showing only a 0.00000458 C increase
from 1973 to 2013):
<https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/valentia_thumb.gif?w=500&h=338>

Iceland - Reyjavik (adjusted upward three times in less than a year,
despite the underlying unmanipulated data showing only a 0.000010049 C
increase from 1973 to 2013):
<https://i2.wp.com/s10.postimg.org/z3og0cwhl/Reykjovik_Jan29_2015_62004030000.gif>
<https://i0.wp.com/s12.postimg.org/3zv0kfn0d/Reykjovik_2015_62004030000.gif>
<https://i2.wp.com/s17.postimg.org/v8rjasxfj/Reykjavik_62004030000.gif>

Spankard gets drop-kicked across Usenet by reality yet again. LOL
================================================================

Now, on to the Greenland Glacier itself:

Message-ID: <f21cdf7e620a54d5348b1176f7700874@dizum.com>
================================================================
Strange that you've not bothered to look at the underlying data, not
even when it's shoved in your stupid piggish libtard face:

Message-ID: <1bc241fbc895df5e77381ad01d2e6847@dizum.com>
---------------------------------------------------------
Greenland's glaciers are not "melting at an accelerating pace",
Moron. They're adding ice... especially in the northernmost parts,
given that it's colder there. Your error is a product of your
demonstrated inability to understand the data, and your reliance upon
libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kook scaremongering websites such as
ecowatch.com, dailykos.com and fastcoexist.com rather than the
underlying (read: unmanipulated) data from NASA, NOAA, UK Met, RSS,
UAH, DMI, NSIDC, etc.

Message-ID: <64b8daa30fcbe2d392a09c382b688536@dizum.com>
=====================================================================
=====================================================================
Message-ID: <29942ec80e73751d26646ffa7c295956@dizum.com>
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland_ice_sheet
> "The ice in the current ice sheet is as old as 110,000 years.[3]"

Which puts truth to the lies of the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks
when they say the Greenland glacier will melt in a few decades or even
centuries. That glacier has withstood far warmer periods than now
(including, inconveniently for the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks, the
Medieval Warm Period, during which Vikings were able to farm land
which is now frozen solid, as proven via the Viking graves found in
permafrost), and it's still there.

And it's not melting at all... it *added* 500 gT of ice in 2014... so
the Klimate Katastrophe Kook blather about "zOMG! The Greenland
glacier had 56 gT of melt last year!" is out-of-context alarmist
propaganda... they counted only that which melted, not that which was
added.

Balancing the equation (something the libtards never seem able to do),
there was a total 556 gT of ice added, a total of 56 gT of melt, for a
grand total of 500 gT net accumulation of ice to the Greenland glacier
in 2014.

<http://www.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/>
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

That's 500 gT of ice added in 2014. 500,000,000,000 tons.
1,000,000,000,000,000 pounds of ice. That's 120,048,020,000,000
gallons of water.

That takes care of 2014. Now how about 2015? Uh oh, what's this,
DildoRider?

<http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/clip_image002_thumb2.gif?w=627&h=295>
<http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/clip_image0043.jpg>

Why, that just happens to be the ice mass balance for Greenland...
showing that 2015 ice mass was well *above* the mean average for the
first quarter of 2015, slightly below average during the summer
months, and again above the mean average for the remainder of the
year... meaning Greenland added ice in 2015, just as it did in 2014.

In fact, NOAA calculated the least amount of _gross_ ice loss from the
Greenland glacier since 1996... when the solar and orbital-forcing
induced "global warming" pause began. Greenland glacier's _net_ ice
mass balance is positive for 2015.

Oh, you just can't catch a break, can you, DildoRider?
<http://www.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/>

<http://www.dmi.dk/uploads/tx_dmidatastore/webservice/b/m/s/y/a/todaysmb.png>
Left: Map of the surface mass balance today (in mm water equivalent
per day). Right: The average surface mass balance for today's calendar
date over the period 1990-2013.

Note the positive 2015 ice mass balance as compared to the 1990-2013
average.

<http://www.dmi.dk/uploads/tx_dmidatastore/webservice/p/a/m/d/e/accumulatedmap.png>
Map of the accumulated surface mass balance (in mm water equivalent)
from September 1st to now.

Note the massively positive ice mass balance.

<http://www.longrangeweather.com/ArticleArchives/GreenlandIceSheet.htm>
268 *feet* of ice had been added to the Greenland Glacier from July
15, 1942 to Jun 30, 1988. That's nearly 6 feet per year, and averages
are *above* that now.

As for the Greenland Glacier advancing faster? That's a Klimate
Katastrophe Kook lie... NASA did a study finding that 84% of the
southern portion of the Greenland Glacier has *slowed* *down* in
recent years.
================================================================

Remember, you're the delusional halfwit who k'lamed that clouds are
caused by "zOMG! Anthorpoomudric Glaobaeel Waoryng! DDUURRRH!!!", then
you tried to k'lame that increased cloud cover caused increased
Greenland glacier melt... both proven *wrong*.

Given that global temperatures have *fallen*, your blather is just
alarmist bleating.

So yet again you find yourself 180 degrees out from reality, Spankard.

SPNAK!

> (KoOkFrOth torrent coming in 3...2...1...)

You've already KoOkFrOthed, LunkHead. I'm sure you do it much more,
given that you've been bootfucked non-stop for more than a month now.
LOL

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
<http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800>

From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; 
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G. 
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Canada by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of 
this, he immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" 
was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL!

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#559197

Try to keep it a little shorter.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web