Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #557872 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-29 08:56 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-02-29 14:11 -0600 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, Unable to Dispute Hydrogen Bonding as Mechanism That Neuttralizes H2O Polarity HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 08:56 -0800
Re: Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, Unable to Dispute Hydrogen Bonding as Mechanism That Neuttralizes H2O Polarity Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, Unable to Dispute Hydrogen Bonding as Mechanism That Neuttralizes H2O Polarity James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:15 -0800
Re: Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, Unable to Dispute Hydrogen Bonding as Mechanism That Neuttralizes H2O Polarity jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:21 +0000
Re: Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, Unable to Dispute Hydrogen Bonding as Mechanism That Neuttralizes H2O Polarity Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 14:11 -0600
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 08:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, Unable to Dispute Hydrogen Bonding as Mechanism That Neuttralizes H2O Polarity |
| Message-ID | <1c9f099c-1cdd-4af7-ba60-5ec98c359ef9@googlegroups.com> |
McFly says Jim....To be frank and honest I think that you are wasting your time on these arguments. There are no mysteries about the hydrogen bond in water, or in other systems. It is the old language and the oversimplifiedl level of your argument(sorry) that causes the confusion. ----------- I'm surprised he took the time to reply to you. Then again, like me, he wanted to take the opportunity to call you a retard. Or as he put it "A simple minded ball of confusion". No offense
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 11:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nb1udh$4o7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557872 |
On 2/29/2016 10:56 AM, HVAC wrote: > McFly says Jim....To be frank and honest I think that you are wasting > your time on these arguments. There are no mysteries about the > hydrogen bond in water, or in other systems. It is the old language > and the oversimplifiedl level of your argument(sorry) that causes the > confusion. ----------- > > I'm surprised he took the time to reply to you. Then again, like me, > he wanted to take the opportunity to call you a retard. Or as he put > it "A simple minded ball of confusion". No offense > effectively expressed in just six words
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 10:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ef526413-5bab-4e97-b989-ed1828a25dcf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #557872 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 8:56:05 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: > McFly says > Jim....To be frank and honest I think that you are wasting your time on these arguments. There are no mysteries about the hydrogen bond in water, or in other systems. It is the old language and the oversimplifiedl level of your argument(sorry) that causes the confusion. > ----------- > > I'm surprised he took the time to reply to you. Then again, like me, he wanted to take the opportunity to call you a retard. Or as he put it "A simple minded ball of confusion". No offense Do you concede that Saykally failed to present a substantive dispute? Answer the question you evasive jackass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <uaieqc-bu5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #557923 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 8:56:05 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: >> McFly says >> Jim....To be frank and honest I think that you are wasting your time on these arguments. There are no mysteries about the hydrogen bond in water, or in other systems. It is the old language and the oversimplifiedl level of your argument(sorry) that causes the confusion. >> ----------- >> >> I'm surprised he took the time to reply to you. Then again, like me, >> he wanted to take the opportunity to call you a retard. Or as he put >> it "A simple minded ball of confusion". No offense > > Do you concede that Saykally failed to present a substantive dispute? Nope, what he said was your "theories" were so stupid and wrong they weren't worth the effort of a reply. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 14:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nb28mo$onn$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557923 |
On 2/29/2016 12:15 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 8:56:05 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: >> McFly says Jim.. >> Then again, like >> me, he wanted to take the opportunity to call you a retard. Or as >> he put it "A simple minded ball of confusion". No offense > So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very own hand.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web