Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #552247 > unrolled thread

Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-11 10:54 -0600
    Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 17:45 +0000
    Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:53 -0800
    Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:57 -0800
      Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 12:08 -0600
        Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 18:22 +0000
          Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 22:32 +0000
            Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 22:35 +0000
              Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:53 +0000
      Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change bilgat@m.mu - 2016-02-12 23:42 -0600
    Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 18:00 +0000

#552247 — Re: Gravatioal waves, ligos, and weight change

Revolutionary discovery: Scientists find gravitational waves Einstein
predicted


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/02/11/ligo-discovers-gravitational-waves/80226644/

Ya know what is amazing is that a few days <maybe a week or two  or
so> ago I weighed myself and I was actually 9 lbs lighter than I was
the day before. 
I thought my difital scale was acting crazy so I used my analog scale
and I weighed the same... 9 lbs lighter....

The next day I weighed myself again and I was back to my original
weight.. after a few days it had me perplexed. After a few more days I
just dismissed it as an error on my part. But now that I have read
that article, I feel that my observations about my weight change was
accurate. 

I remember when I checked my weight I was thinking there must have
been some stellar event, but I thought that it would have been much
more local.
Now I know for sure how to show gravational waves.... boy I could have
saved those guys that built the ligos system ALOT of money

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#552262

bilgat wrote:

> Revolutionary discovery: Scientists find gravitational waves Einstein
> predicted

Lol, coincidentally the trick is not repeatable, unless nudging those 
mirrors, just to help starting vibrate. Thanks for the laugh, 
ahahahahahanson.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552263

On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 6:55:07 PM UTC+2, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> Revolutionary discovery: Scientists find gravitational waves Einstein
> predicted
> 
> 
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/02/11/ligo-discovers-gravitational-waves/80226644/
> 
> Ya know what is amazing is that a few days <maybe a week or two  or
> so> ago I weighed myself and I was actually 9 lbs lighter than I was
> the day before. 
> I thought my difital scale was acting crazy so I used my analog scale
> and I weighed the same... 9 lbs lighter....
> 
> The next day I weighed myself again and I was back to my original
> weight.. after a few days it had me perplexed. After a few more days I
> just dismissed it as an error on my part. But now that I have read
> that article, I feel that my observations about my weight change was
> accurate. 
> 
> I remember when I checked my weight I was thinking there must have
> been some stellar event, but I thought that it would have been much
> more local.
> Now I know for sure how to show gravational waves.... boy I could have
> saved those guys that built the ligos system ALOT of money
============================
(:-)
Y.P
=====================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552265

On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 8:55:07 AM UTC-8, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> Revolutionary discovery: Scientists find gravitational waves Einstein
> predicted
> 
> 
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/02/11/ligo-discovers-gravitational-waves/80226644/
> 
> Ya know what is amazing is that a few days <maybe a week or two  or
> so> ago I weighed myself and I was actually 9 lbs lighter than I was
> the day before. 
> I thought my difital scale was acting crazy so I used my analog scale
> and I weighed the same... 9 lbs lighter....
> 
> The next day I weighed myself again and I was back to my original
> weight.. after a few days it had me perplexed. After a few more days I
> just dismissed it as an error on my part. But now that I have read
> that article, I feel that my observations about my weight change was
> accurate. 
> 
> I remember when I checked my weight I was thinking there must have
> been some stellar event, but I thought that it would have been much
> more local.
> Now I know for sure how to show gravational waves.... boy I could have
> saved those guys that built the ligos system ALOT of money

Did you take a big shit? GOPer Mafia"s LIGO shits. Force of gravity is location location location. You weigh more at the poles. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552271

On 2/11/16 11:57 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Did you take a big shit?


   He got dehydrated, reber.

   Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
 > 
http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102



 > Gravitational waves emitted by the merger of two black holes have
 > been detected, setting the course for a new era of observational
 > astrophysics.

 > Now, what was once considered “impossible by several orders of
 > magnitude” is a reality. To confirm the gravitational-wave nature of
 > their signal, the researchers used two different data analysis
 > methods. The first was to determine whether the excess power in the
 > photodetector could be caused by a signal, given their best estimate
 > of the noise, but without any assumptions about the origin of the
 > signal itself. From this analysis, they could say that a transient,
 > “unmodeled” signal was observed with a statistical significance
 > greater than 4.6𝜎 4 6 𝜎 . The second method involved comparing the
 > instrumental output (signal plus noise) with a theoretical signal
 > from numerical simulations of merging black holes using general
 > relativity. From this so-called matched-filtering search, the
 > researchers concluded that the significance of the observation was
 > greater than 5.1𝜎 5 1 𝜎 .
 >
 > The most exciting conclusions come from comparing the observed
 > signal’s amplitude and phase with numerical relativity predictions,
 > which allows the LIGO researchers to estimate parameters describing
 > the gravitational-wave source. The waveform is consistent with a
 > black hole binary system whose component masses are 36 and 29 times
 > the mass of the Sun. These stellar-mass black holes—so named because
 > they likely formed from collapsing stars—are the largest of their
 > kind to have been observed. Moreover, no binary system other than
 > black holes can have component masses large enough to explain the
 > observed signal. (The most plausible competitors would be two neutron
 > stars, or a black hole and a neutron star.) The binary is
 > approximately 1.3 billion light years from Earth, or equivalently, at
 > a luminosity distance of 400 megaparsecs (redshift of z∼0.1 z 0 1 ).
 > The researchers estimate that about 4.6% of the binary's energy was
 > radiated in gravitational waves, leading to a rotating black hole
 > remnant with mass 62 times the mass of the Sun and dimensionless spin
 > of 0.67.
 >


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552278

Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 2/11/16 11:57 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> Did you take a big shit?
> 
> 
>    He got dehydrated, reber.
> 
>    Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
>  > 
> http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/
PhysRevLett.116.061102

Don't believe them. If real that must be the sound of the matter, read 
planets and stars, the wave went through along the path of its journey. 

Hence, a proper detection of the embedded harmonics may reveal whether 
life is existent on other planets and other solar systems. Please register 
I am the first to reveal it, the procedure. I can do this for them right 
now, I just need the data. They pay, I do job.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552380

David Waite wrote:
>> > http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/
>> PhysRevLett.116.061102
>> 
>> Don't believe them....
> 
> Ah so you racists are going to lie. Big surprise. Anyway, full version
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_582rU6neLc

Nothing to do with. I just wait to see the errorbars associated with that 
"signal" (strain 10⁻²¹ /2 divisions, 50ms/division) for a total of 200 ms. 
A furier will likely give a start of about 100, 30, 60 ending at about 180 
Hz. Looks like an earthquake to me. I wonder how the filter out those 
small earthquakes. Or VOICE played backwards, lol. Thanks for the info.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552381

Muddy Shoes wrote:

> David Waite wrote:
>>> > http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/
>>> PhysRevLett.116.061102
>>> 
>>> Don't believe them....
>> 
>> Ah so you racists are going to lie. Big surprise. Anyway, full version
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_582rU6neLc
> 
> Nothing to do with. I just wait to see the errorbars associated with
> that "signal" (strain 10⁻²¹ /2 divisions, 50ms/division) for a total of
> 200 ms.
> A furier will likely give a start of about 100, 30, 60 ending at about
> 180 Hz. Looks like an earthquake to me. I wonder how the filter out
> those small earthquakes. Or VOICE played backwards, lol. Thanks for the
> info.

Thinking at it, they can actually send voice, words from outside the 
Universe. Hmmm, one more proof the evolution is wrong. Thank you very much.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554248

David Waite wrote:

>> Thinking at it, they can actually send voice, words from outside the
>> Universe. Hmmm, one more proof the evolution is wrong. Thank you very
>> much.
> 
> And you immoral religionists were wrong too.

You only say that since you are unbelievable stupid. The entire Universe 
is all about religion. Advanced science and physics is reaching the level 
where the religion become obvious. What science and physics want to learn 
is religion. Relativity as such is religion. You learned nothing, you see 
nothing, like a mute.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552748

On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:57:03 -0800 (PST), "reber g=emc^2"
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 8:55:07 AM UTC-8, bil...@m.nu wrote:
>> Revolutionary discovery: Scientists find gravitational waves Einstein
>> predicted
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/02/11/ligo-discovers-gravitational-waves/80226644/
>> 
>> Ya know what is amazing is that a few days <maybe a week or two  or
>> so> ago I weighed myself and I was actually 9 lbs lighter than I was
>> the day before. 
>> I thought my difital scale was acting crazy so I used my analog scale
>> and I weighed the same... 9 lbs lighter....
>> 
>> The next day I weighed myself again and I was back to my original
>> weight.. after a few days it had me perplexed. After a few more days I
>> just dismissed it as an error on my part. But now that I have read
>> that article, I feel that my observations about my weight change was
>> accurate. 
>> 
>> I remember when I checked my weight I was thinking there must have
>> been some stellar event, but I thought that it would have been much
>> more local.
>> Now I know for sure how to show gravational waves.... boy I could have
>> saved those guys that built the ligos system ALOT of money
>
>Did you take a big shit? GOPer Mafia"s LIGO shits. Force of gravity is location location location. You weigh more at the poles. TreBert


and you are a freakin retard

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552266

David Waite wrote:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpusGtb_wL8

That man doesn't know his Relativity

"produced by two colliding black holes by 1.3 bil years ago"

What does that "ago" means!?? LOL, there is no simultaneous time in this 
Universe. Man, he makes mistakes already in his own presentation of "his" 
discovery. Nudging mirrors is so easy to perform, even a fart can nudge 
those mirrors. Relativity proved right one more time. This never ends.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web