Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551058 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 366 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 08:21 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-07 10:38 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 ˌsōlər ˈpleksəs <solar@plexus.org> - 2016-02-07 17:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:36 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 08:33 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-08 01:35 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 13:45 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:30 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 02:27 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:03 -0800
Re: whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:46 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-07 20:28 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 13:53 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-07 21:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 22:35 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:36 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 15:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 23:05 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 16:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-11 07:54 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 22:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 04:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 08:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:50 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 21:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-15 01:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 13:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 02:43 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 23:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
ha, yummy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:16 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:11 +0000
lunarstuff; who wasn't really theresville noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 14:32 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:03 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:14 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 22:46 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:50 -0600
misson implausibly noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 19:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:59 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 01:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 15:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:43 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Guess Who <don'temailme@youputz.cpom> - 2016-02-13 15:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-13 16:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-13 21:22 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-16 08:24 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-17 06:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:19 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-18 10:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 20:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 17:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 16:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 15:02 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 00:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 02:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:54 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:48 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 17:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 18:27 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 20:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 13:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 18:09 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 19:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 12:57 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:21 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 16:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:17 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 06:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:39 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-12 15:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:16 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:05 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:17 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 18:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 17:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-11 14:53 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:07 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:40 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 08:34 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:41 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 10:01 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:25 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:05 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:38 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 10:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 15:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 16:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 17:15 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 01:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 14:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 02:36 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 23:23 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 00:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-13 16:42 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 17:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:26 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:11 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-08 04:59 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-08 16:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 00:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 12:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:27 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 02:41 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 16:49 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 13:22 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:30 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 21:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:37 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:51 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:01 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 18:49 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 17:19 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 19:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 12:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 18:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-10 03:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 12:57 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:47 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600
Page 3 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 19 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 21:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9rdnl$saq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #553235 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > >> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. >> ...And know who might have use of it today. >> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I >> might have reached today > > Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). Awwww, You didn't like that one ? Here.....Try this one. Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 01:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pbs2cb9u92up25uhifq36gb8b3mbg4gj02@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553246 |
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> >>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. >>> ...And know who might have use of it today. >>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I >>> might have reached today >> >> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). > > > > > >Awwww, You didn't like that one ? Your disjointed thoughts and comments? Nope. I don't suffer fools gladly. That comment is not meant as sarcasm as the original intent but rather as is commonly used today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 04:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9s6bi$vch$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #553280 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. >>>> ...And know who might have use of it today. >>>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I >>>> might have reached today >>> >>> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). >> >> >> >> >> >> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > > Your disjointed thoughts and comments? Nope. I don't suffer fools > gladly. That comment is not meant as sarcasm as the original intent > but rather as is commonly used today. Oh gosh, you lost the link again. How careless of you. Fortunately it's still in MY POST, for everyone else to see. But I'll copy my reply for you again. BELOW ...Be careful this time. You wouldn't want it to look to all the world that you have no argument and just delete or ignore, what you can't refute. Awwww, You didn't like that one ? Here.....Try this one. Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312bca27584a209098c517@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553309 |
In article <n9s6bi$vch$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. > >>>> ...And know who might have use of it today. > >>>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality I > >>>> might have reached today > >>> > >>> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > > > > Your disjointed thoughts and comments? Nope. I don't suffer fools > > gladly. That comment is not meant as sarcasm as the original intent > > but rather as is commonly used today. > > > > > > > Oh gosh, you lost the link again. How careless of you. > Fortunately it's still in MY POST, for everyone else to see. > But I'll copy my reply for you again. BELOW > > ...Be careful this time. You wouldn't want it to look to all the world that > you have no argument and just delete or ignore, what you can't refute. > > > > Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > Here.....Try this one. > > Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted that video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 13:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9t41v$h97$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #553358 |
BDK wrote: > In article <n9s6bi$vch$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. >>>>>> ...And know who might have use of it today. >>>>>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality >>>>>> I might have reached today >>>>> >>>>> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? >>> >>> Your disjointed thoughts and comments? Nope. I don't suffer fools >>> gladly. That comment is not meant as sarcasm as the original intent >>> but rather as is commonly used today. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Oh gosh, you lost the link again. How careless of you. >> Fortunately it's still in MY POST, for everyone else to see. >> But I'll copy my reply for you again. BELOW >> >> ...Be careful this time. You wouldn't want it to look to all the world >> that you have no argument and just delete or ignore, what you can't >> refute. >> >> >> >> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? >> Here.....Try this one. >> >> Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU > > It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted that > video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it. Geeeez, give me SOME credit. I sat in amazement as a child watching the live telecast of those first steps. BUT I knew manned moon trips were impossible as soon as I started school, and learned WHY it was impossible. So someday when you reach high school,....there is still hope you to may learn the truth of science. I know you may think grammer school is impossible to graduate from,. but eventually they will get tired of repeating you in grade 6 over and over and over, and pass you just to get you out of their hair.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 18:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312c2774acddab898c519@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553396 |
In article <n9t41v$h97$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <n9s6bi$vch$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:39:35 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:42:54 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> I can't see 4 or 5 of you actually sharing one brain. > >>>>>> ...And know who might have use of it today. > >>>>>> So it makes sense that I might be confused about which personality > >>>>>> I might have reached today > >>>>> > >>>>> Another example of Bast's mental illness(es). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > >>> > >>> Your disjointed thoughts and comments? Nope. I don't suffer fools > >>> gladly. That comment is not meant as sarcasm as the original intent > >>> but rather as is commonly used today. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Oh gosh, you lost the link again. How careless of you. > >> Fortunately it's still in MY POST, for everyone else to see. > >> But I'll copy my reply for you again. BELOW > >> > >> ...Be careful this time. You wouldn't want it to look to all the world > >> that you have no argument and just delete or ignore, what you can't > >> refute. > >> > >> > >> > >> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > >> Here.....Try this one. > >> > >> Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU > > > > It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted that > > video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it. > > > > > > Geeeez, give me SOME credit. > I sat in amazement as a child watching the live telecast of those first > steps. > BUT I knew manned moon trips were impossible as soon as I started school, > and learned WHY it was impossible. > > So someday when you reach high school,....there is still hope you to may > learn the truth of science. > I know you may think grammer school is impossible to graduate from,. but > eventually they will get tired of repeating you in grade 6 over and over and > over, and pass you just to get you out of their hair. More delusional fantasies. Typical of the insane. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sgn4cbpv38mqlb5q5lschbv0n5hc6m73ef@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553396 |
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:09:30 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>> Awwww, You didn't like that one ?
>>> Here.....Try this one.
>>>
>>> Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU
>>
>> It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted that
>> video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it.
>
>
>Geeeez, give me SOME credit.
You buy into a k00k video that PROVES itself false in less than a
minute, but want some credit? Really?
>I sat in amazement as a child watching the live telecast of those first
>steps.
As did I, though I don't actually remember it.
Literally millions of people all over the world watched the live
even.
>BUT I knew manned moon trips were impossible as soon as I started school,
>and learned WHY it was impossible.
But it wasn't impossible.
You're still free to provide VALID evidence that it was
impossible.
>
>So someday when you reach high school,....there is still hope you to may
>learn the truth of science.
What truth is that?
>I know you may think grammer school is impossible to graduate from,. but
>eventually they will get tired of repeating you in grade 6 over and over and
Wow. An ad hom. Nothing screams failure like having been reduced
to ad hom attacks.
How about explaining, in detail, why the man missions were
impossible. And please use valid, verifiable evidence for your claims.
I will certainly be using them to counter you.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 19:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312c32bd408939c398c51b@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553443 |
In article <sgn4cbpv38mqlb5q5lschbv0n5hc6m73ef@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:09:30 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > [...] > > >>> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? > >>> Here.....Try this one. > >>> > >>> Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU > >> > >> It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted that > >> video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it. > > > > > >Geeeez, give me SOME credit. > > You buy into a k00k video that PROVES itself false in less than a > minute, but want some credit? Really? > > >I sat in amazement as a child watching the live telecast of those first > >steps. > > As did I, though I don't actually remember it. > Literally millions of people all over the world watched the live > even. > > >BUT I knew manned moon trips were impossible as soon as I started school, > >and learned WHY it was impossible. > > But it wasn't impossible. > You're still free to provide VALID evidence that it was > impossible. > > > > >So someday when you reach high school,....there is still hope you to may > >learn the truth of science. > > What truth is that? > > >I know you may think grammer school is impossible to graduate from,. but > >eventually they will get tired of repeating you in grade 6 over and over and > > Wow. An ad hom. Nothing screams failure like having been reduced > to ad hom attacks. > How about explaining, in detail, why the man missions were > impossible. And please use valid, verifiable evidence for your claims. > I will certainly be using them to counter you. I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen Belts, or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, line, and sinker. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 04:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d6t5cbhsh0l3jqnl2sdmibobb0e6vgrsel@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553450 |
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:09:21 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <sgn4cbpv38mqlb5q5lschbv0n5hc6m73ef@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:09:30 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >>> Awwww, You didn't like that one ?
>> >>> Here.....Try this one.
>> >>>
>> >>> Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN
>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU
>> >>
>> >> It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted that
>> >> video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it.
>> >
>> >
>> >Geeeez, give me SOME credit.
>>
>> You buy into a k00k video that PROVES itself false in less than a
>> minute, but want some credit? Really?
>>
>> >I sat in amazement as a child watching the live telecast of those first
>> >steps.
>>
>> As did I, though I don't actually remember it.
>> Literally millions of people all over the world watched the live
>> even.
>>
>> >BUT I knew manned moon trips were impossible as soon as I started school,
>> >and learned WHY it was impossible.
>>
>> But it wasn't impossible.
>> You're still free to provide VALID evidence that it was
>> impossible.
>>
>> >So someday when you reach high school,....there is still hope you to may
>> >learn the truth of science.
>>
>> What truth is that?
>>
>> >I know you may think grammer school is impossible to graduate from,. but
>> >eventually they will get tired of repeating you in grade 6 over and over and
>>
>> Wow. An ad hom. Nothing screams failure like having been reduced
>> to ad hom attacks.
>> How about explaining, in detail, why the man missions were
>> impossible. And please use valid, verifiable evidence for your claims.
>> I will certainly be using them to counter you.
>
>I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen Belts,
>or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, line, and
>sinker.
The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent
passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long
enough for fatal exposure.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 09:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9va1t$k72$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #553498 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:09:21 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > >> In article <sgn4cbpv38mqlb5q5lschbv0n5hc6m73ef@4ax.com>, >> compuelf@gmail.com says... >>> >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:09:30 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>> Awwww, You didn't like that one ? >>>>>> Here.....Try this one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxxzEIzDVU >>>>> >>>>> It would take someone as insane and stupid as the goof who posted >>>>> that video to buy into it. So, no surprise you do buy into it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Geeeez, give me SOME credit. >>> >>> You buy into a k00k video that PROVES itself false in less than a >>> minute, but want some credit? Really? >>> >>>> I sat in amazement as a child watching the live telecast of those >>>> first steps. >>> >>> As did I, though I don't actually remember it. >>> Literally millions of people all over the world watched the live >>> even. >>> >>>> BUT I knew manned moon trips were impossible as soon as I started >>>> school, and learned WHY it was impossible. >>> >>> But it wasn't impossible. >>> You're still free to provide VALID evidence that it was >>> impossible. >>> >>>> So someday when you reach high school,....there is still hope you to >>>> may learn the truth of science. >>> >>> What truth is that? >>> >>>> I know you may think grammer school is impossible to graduate from,. >>>> but eventually they will get tired of repeating you in grade 6 over >>>> and over and >>> >>> Wow. An ad hom. Nothing screams failure like having been reduced >>> to ad hom attacks. >>> How about explaining, in detail, why the man missions were >>> impossible. And please use valid, verifiable evidence for your claims. >>> I will certainly be using them to counter you. >> >> I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen Belts, >> or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, line, and >> sinker. > > The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent > passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long > enough for fatal exposure. Really,....so how about you taking a trip to fukushima and show us how long you can survive in the reactor shells. Don't worry, what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger, right ? Of course it would make a lot more sense to have the space station orbiting several hundred miles higher to get it completely out of earths atmosphere. Wonder why NASA never thought of that ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 14:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9vd80$9bi$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #553529 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen Belts, >>> or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, line, and >>> sinker. >> >> The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent >> passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long >> enough for fatal exposure. >Really,....so how about you taking a trip to fukushima and show us how long >you can survive in the reactor shells. Nope, it is well known that how dangerous radiation is is a function of exposure time multiplied by the radiation rate. Of course this is a red herring, leaking failed reactors will have a much higher radiation rate than the Van Allen belts, so "safe" exposure time will be that much shorter, If it's 100 times more intense, then the "safe" time will be 100 times shorter. A million times more intense = a million times shorter safe time. But the kooks all (deliberately) overlook one thing: The Apollo missions simply went around the worse of the Van Allen belts. They avoided the inner belt completely and went through a weaker portion of the outer belt, and spent little time there. The belts are aligned with the (magnetic) equator so they went out closer to the magnetic poles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312d4ef344edf32d98c520@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553539 |
In article <n9vd80$9bi$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > > >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>> I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen Belts, > >>> or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, line, and > >>> sinker. > >> > >> The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent > >> passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long > >> enough for fatal exposure. > > >Really,....so how about you taking a trip to fukushima and show us how long > >you can survive in the reactor shells. > > Nope, it is well known that how dangerous radiation is is a function > of exposure time multiplied by the radiation rate. > > Of course this is a red herring, leaking failed reactors will have a > much higher radiation rate than the Van Allen belts, so "safe" exposure > time will be that much shorter, If it's 100 times more intense, then the > "safe" time will be 100 times shorter. A million times more intense = > a million times shorter safe time. > > But the kooks all (deliberately) overlook one thing: The Apollo missions > simply went around the worse of the Van Allen belts. They avoided the > inner belt completely and went through a weaker portion of the outer belt, > and spent little time there. The belts are aligned with the (magnetic) > equator so they went out closer to the magnetic poles. You would do better explaining the above to your dog. At least he/she might twist his head and seem to listen. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 02:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <na0mob$u2r$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #553606 |
BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes: >You would do better explaining the above to your dog. At least he/she >might twist his head and seem to listen. As I mentioned before, k00ktaunting is a form of entertainment for me. Yes, I know, I shouldn't have fun at the expense of my inferiors. I know the likes of slowjoe will never understand my explanations. But maybe there are lurkers out there who may learn from my posts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 01:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312ddafbac347d2b98c522@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553729 |
In article <na0mob$u2r$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > > BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes: > > >You would do better explaining the above to your dog. At least he/she > >might twist his head and seem to listen. > > As I mentioned before, k00ktaunting is a form of entertainment for me. > Yes, I know, I shouldn't have fun at the expense of my inferiors. It's too fun not to do it. > > I know the likes of slowjoe will never understand my explanations. > But maybe there are lurkers out there who may learn from my posts. I firmly believe SlowJoe is nothing but a troll. Bast is the real thing. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 13:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na2df6$s7i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #553606 |
BDK wrote: > In article <n9vd80$9bi$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com > says... >> >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>> I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen >>>>> Belts, or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, >>>>> line, and sinker. >>>> >>>> The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent >>>> passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long >>>> enough for fatal exposure. >> >>> Really,....so how about you taking a trip to fukushima and show us >>> how long you can survive in the reactor shells. >> >> Nope, it is well known that how dangerous radiation is is a function >> of exposure time multiplied by the radiation rate. >> >> Of course this is a red herring, leaking failed reactors will have a >> much higher radiation rate than the Van Allen belts, so "safe" exposure >> time will be that much shorter, If it's 100 times more intense, then >> the "safe" time will be 100 times shorter. A million times more >> intense = >> a million times shorter safe time. >> >> But the kooks all (deliberately) overlook one thing: The Apollo >> missions simply went around the worse of the Van Allen belts. They >> avoided the inner belt completely and went through a weaker portion of >> the outer belt, and spent little time there. The belts are aligned >> with the (magnetic) equator so they went out closer to the magnetic >> poles. > > You would do better explaining the above to your dog. At least he/she > might twist his head and seem to listen. You might as well try that explanation on a dog. You can even try explaining to the dog just how the apollo craft were able to make a 90 degree turn in space
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312e8e4b107ab72d98c526@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553963 |
In article <na2df6$s7i$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <n9vd80$9bi$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com > > says... > >> > >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >> > >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>>>> I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen > >>>>> Belts, or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook, > >>>>> line, and sinker. > >>>> > >>>> The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent > >>>> passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long > >>>> enough for fatal exposure. > >> > >>> Really,....so how about you taking a trip to fukushima and show us > >>> how long you can survive in the reactor shells. > >> > >> Nope, it is well known that how dangerous radiation is is a function > >> of exposure time multiplied by the radiation rate. > >> > >> Of course this is a red herring, leaking failed reactors will have a > >> much higher radiation rate than the Van Allen belts, so "safe" exposure > >> time will be that much shorter, If it's 100 times more intense, then > >> the "safe" time will be 100 times shorter. A million times more > >> intense = > >> a million times shorter safe time. > >> > >> But the kooks all (deliberately) overlook one thing: The Apollo > >> missions simply went around the worse of the Van Allen belts. They > >> avoided the inner belt completely and went through a weaker portion of > >> the outer belt, and spent little time there. The belts are aligned > >> with the (magnetic) equator so they went out closer to the magnetic > >> poles. > > > > You would do better explaining the above to your dog. At least he/she > > might twist his head and seem to listen. > > > > > > > You might as well try that explanation on a dog. > You can even try explaining to the dog just how the apollo craft were able > to make a 90 degree turn in space A 90 degree turn?? Ok, I'll bite, when did they make a 90 degree turn and why would they do it? I bet this one will set new records in Stooptardery. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 19:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <na2hnt$d0v$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #553963 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >You might as well try that explanation on a dog. >You can even try explaining to the dog just how the apollo craft were able >to make a 90 degree turn in space Wow, Bast has never heard of these miracle components of rockets called "rocket engines"! (and it wasn't a 90 degree turn anyway, they simply avoided the worst of the belts, not the belts completely) Geez, I knew kooktards were dumb, but I never realized they were that dumb!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 23:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312f0e58eba7fd598c527@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #554009 |
In article <na2hnt$d0v$2@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > > >You might as well try that explanation on a dog. > >You can even try explaining to the dog just how the apollo craft were able > >to make a 90 degree turn in space > > Wow, Bast has never heard of these miracle components of rockets called > "rocket engines"! (and it wasn't a 90 degree turn anyway, they simply > avoided the worst of the belts, not the belts completely) > > Geez, I knew kooktards were dumb, but I never realized they were that > dumb! I want her to fully explain the whole deal, in her "special ed" sort of way. Could be a good one. And yes, over the years they've proven, time and time again to be an endless well of stupid. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a05bcb5oati4k70efbirm7hr0e2ng9862s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553963 |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:20:12 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>BDK wrote:
>> In article <n9vd80$9bi$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>> I'm going to predict she will say something about the Van Allen
>>>>>> Belts, or some other BS she read on a kOOksite and swallowed, hook,
>>>>>> line, and sinker.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem with that is the fact that very little time was spent
>>>>> passing through the belts. Roughly four hours total. That's not long
>>>>> enough for fatal exposure.
>>>
>>>> Really,....so how about you taking a trip to fukushima and show us
>>>> how long you can survive in the reactor shells.
>>>
>>> Nope, it is well known that how dangerous radiation is is a function
>>> of exposure time multiplied by the radiation rate.
>>>
>>> Of course this is a red herring, leaking failed reactors will have a
>>> much higher radiation rate than the Van Allen belts, so "safe" exposure
>>> time will be that much shorter, If it's 100 times more intense, then
>>> the "safe" time will be 100 times shorter. A million times more
>>> intense = a million times shorter safe time.
>>>
>>> But the kooks all (deliberately) overlook one thing: The Apollo
>>> missions simply went around the worse of the Van Allen belts. They
>>> avoided the inner belt completely and went through a weaker portion of
>>> the outer belt, and spent little time there. The belts are aligned
>>> with the (magnetic) equator so they went out closer to the magnetic
>>> poles.
>>
>> You would do better explaining the above to your dog. At least he/she
>> might twist his head and seem to listen.
>
>
>You might as well try that explanation on a dog.
Do you think yourself that dumb? Really?
>You can even try explaining to the dog just how the apollo craft were able
>to make a 90 degree turn in space
It can be done. I don't recall any Apollo craft doing it, but it
can be done.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 13:42 -0800 |
| Subject | ha, yummy |
| Message-ID | <1aeccb4e-f72d-4ff7-8efd-9b16e566d98a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #553539 |
because radioactive elements are heavy, they sink to the bottom, thus negating almost all of their danger, except for the benthics ... so, don't eat any benthic from Fukushima > Of course this is a red herring, leaking failed reactors will have a > much higher radiation rate than the Van Allen belts, so "safe" exposure > time will be that much shorter, If it's 100 times more intense, then the > "safe" time will be 100 times shorter. A million times more intense = > a million times shorter safe time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web