Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #552538 > unrolled thread

Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics

Started bymoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
First post2016-02-12 17:00 +0000
Last post2016-02-14 02:26 -0800
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-12 17:00 +0000
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:16 -0600
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:26 -0800

#552538 — Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-02-12 17:00 +0000
SubjectRe: Gravitational waves and skeptics
Message-ID<n9l33o$jlm$1@pcls7.std.com>
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 9:04:09 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> [To Pentcho, John Sefton, Ben Jacoby and other like-minded luddites]
...
> Some possibilities:
...
> Which of these, oh skeptics of modern physics, is you?

You forgot one.

"I don't care what they saw.  Einstein predicted it, so it just HAS to be 
wrong!  Because, you know, Einstein."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#552544

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-12 11:16 -0600
Message-ID<n9l41b$1evf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#552538
On 2/12/2016 11:00 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 9:04:09 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> [To Pentcho, John Sefton, Ben Jacoby and other like-minded luddites]
> ...
>> Some possibilities:
> ...
>> Which of these, oh skeptics of modern physics, is you?
>
> You forgot one.
>
> "I don't care what they saw.  Einstein predicted it, so it just HAS to be
> wrong!  Because, you know, Einstein."
>

I would write this as:
"Physicists are not worthy of respect. So the respect afforded to 
Einstein is tantamount, in fact, to idolatrous worship. And because he 
is worshiped, nobody really bothers to check his theories against 
experimental observation. Instead, they just lap it up and fabricate 
things to support their idolatrous worship. Therefore, any experimental 
claim that purports to support Einstein is known right out the gate to 
be fraudulent. Any REAL scientist will doubt the work of any physicist, 
and so not give any respect to any one physicist. Which is what makes ME 
a real scientist."

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#553093

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-14 02:26 -0800
Message-ID<3999bc46-67a1-4d45-a1de-97c3a748afcb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#552538
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 7:00:56 PM UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 9:04:09 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > [To Pentcho, John Sefton, Ben Jacoby and other like-minded luddites]
> ...
> > Some possibilities:
> ...
> > Which of these, oh skeptics of modern physics, is you?
> 
> You forgot one.
> 
> "I don't care what they saw.  Einstein predicted it, so it just HAS to be 
> wrong!  Because, you know, Einstein."

======================
(:-)
crook 
Y.P
=====================

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web