Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #551443 > unrolled thread

Making sense of metallic glass

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2016-02-08 18:59 -0600
Last post2016-02-09 07:04 -0800
Articles 7 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Making sense of metallic glass Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 18:59 -0600
    Making sense of metallic glass john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:01 -0800
      Re: Making sense of metallic glass moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 12:51 +0000
      Re: Making sense of metallic glass Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-09 07:23 -0600
      Re: Making sense of metallic glass Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 07:56 -0600
      Re: Making sense of metallic glass Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:54 -0600
        Re: Making sense of metallic glass Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 07:04 -0800

#551443 — Making sense of metallic glass

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-08 18:59 -0600
SubjectMaking sense of metallic glass
Message-ID<zpSdne7lZPqUpyTLnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Making sense of metallic glass
> http://phys.org/news/2016-02-metallic-glass.html


> If you freeze any liquid fast enough, even liquid metal, it becomes a
> glass. Vitrified metals, or metallic glasses, are at the frontier of
> materials science research. They have been made by rapidly cooling
> alloys of various metals including, zirconium, palladium, iron,
> titanium, copper, and magnesium, and used for a variety of
> applications from making golf clubs to aerospace construction. But
> much about them remains poorly understood.
>
> A team including Carnegie's Qiaoshi "Charles" Zeng and Ho-kwang
> "Dave" Mao, among others, is trying to figure out the rules that
> govern metallic glass's creation. They are doing this by looking at
> metallic glasses under extreme pressures. High-pressure research can
> be used to probe structure on an atomic level and understand a
> material's state of order or disorder.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#551568

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-09 04:01 -0800
Message-ID<cfdb4ab9-b8b6-4e7f-a09c-73555d7a822c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#551443
Atoms are EXTREMELY ORDERED.

There is NO RANDOMNESS.

Figure that out, retards

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551580

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-02-09 12:51 +0000
Message-ID<n9cnco$n4v$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#551568
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Atoms are EXTREMELY ORDERED.

>There is NO RANDOMNESS.

Demonstrate a crystal structure in window glass.  (or liquid water for 
that matter).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551588

FromSergio <imvalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-02-09 07:23 -0600
Message-ID<n9cp9l$1j4u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#551568
On 2/9/2016 6:01 AM, john wrote:
> Atoms are EXTREMELY ORDERED.
>

not in a gas.


> There is NO RANDOMNESS.

gas atoms are random


>
> Figure that out, retards
>


Who is head of the retards here ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551602

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-09 07:56 -0600
Message-ID<KNidneQjB62UbSTLnZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#551568
On 2/9/16 6:01 AM, john wrote:
> Atoms are EXTREMELY ORDERED.
>
> There is NO RANDOMNESS.
>
> Figure that out, retards
>


   Somehow you missed out on how the quantum world behaves, John. One
   would think that people who hang out in sci.physics, would love
   physics and mathematics. Most posters here ridicule and disparage the
   subjects. Many carry the baggage of being failed students.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551645

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-09 08:54 -0600
Message-ID<n9cuif$1tgi$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#551568
On 2/9/2016 6:01 AM, john wrote:
> Atoms are EXTREMELY ORDERED.

Who says, John?

>
> There is NO RANDOMNESS.
>
> Figure that out, retards
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551652

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-09 07:04 -0800
Message-ID<2f25138c-1d2c-4602-84a7-9d06dad0889d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#551645
On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 9:54:15 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 6:01 AM, john wrote:
> > Atoms are EXTREMELY ORDERED.
> 
> Who says, John?

Periodic Table?! Good for playing Table Tennis upon too!

> > There is NO RANDOMNESS.
> >
> > Figure that out, retards
>
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Poet Pla(y)ing Tennis... Roger my Roger!”
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=roger+federer

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web