Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551058 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 366 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 08:21 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-07 10:38 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 ˌsōlər ˈpleksəs <solar@plexus.org> - 2016-02-07 17:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:36 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 08:33 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-08 01:35 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 13:45 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:30 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 02:27 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:03 -0800
Re: whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:46 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-07 20:28 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 13:53 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-07 21:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 22:35 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:36 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 15:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 23:05 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 16:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-11 07:54 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 22:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 04:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 08:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:50 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 21:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-15 01:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 13:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 02:43 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 23:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
ha, yummy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:16 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:11 +0000
lunarstuff; who wasn't really theresville noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 14:32 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:03 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:14 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 22:46 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:50 -0600
misson implausibly noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 19:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:59 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 01:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 15:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:43 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Guess Who <don'temailme@youputz.cpom> - 2016-02-13 15:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-13 16:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-13 21:22 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-16 08:24 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-17 06:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:19 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-18 10:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 20:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 17:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 16:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 15:02 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 00:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 02:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:54 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:48 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 17:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 18:27 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 20:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 13:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 18:09 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 19:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 12:57 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:21 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 16:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:17 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 06:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:39 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-12 15:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:16 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:05 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:17 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 18:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 17:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-11 14:53 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:07 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:40 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 08:34 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:41 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 10:01 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:25 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:05 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:38 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 10:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 15:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 16:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 17:15 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 01:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 14:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 02:36 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 23:23 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 00:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-13 16:42 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 17:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:26 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:11 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-08 04:59 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-08 16:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 00:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 12:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:27 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 02:41 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 16:49 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 13:22 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:30 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 21:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:37 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:51 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:01 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 18:49 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 17:19 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 19:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 12:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 18:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-10 03:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 12:57 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:47 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600
Page 10 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 19 Next page →
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 08:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <97005e4b-3c58-46fa-8bea-417d9fc20f52@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #551676 |
BJ said I don't remember volunteering > and especially not to go to Vietnam. ----------- You were in Vietnam BJ? What branch of the service?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-12 15:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n9liim$aq5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #551628 |
On 2/9/2016 8:28 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in
>> Vietnam.
> -------------
>
> There were no lies from the government re the Tonkin incident. There
> was a bit of the 'fog of war' but no lies.
>
> Also, most of the military serving in Vietnam were volunteers.
bullshit.
> When I
> was there (1971-72) at least 95% of the people there had not only
> volunteered for the Army, they also volunteered to go to Vietnam.
wrong! using ESP again ?
25% were drafted, 1,728,344 men were drafted.
from
http://www.veteranshour.com/vietnam_war_statistics.htm
POWs: 766 (114 Died in captivity.)
25% (648,500) Of total forces in country were draftees.
Draftees accounted for 30.4% (17,725) of combat deaths in Vietnam.
Reservist killed: 5,977
National Guard: 6,140 Served; 101 Died
Total draftees (1965-73): 1,728,344.
Actually served in Vietnam 38%.
Marine Corps Draft: 42,633
Last man drafted June 30, 1973.
Vietnam Vets: 9.7% of their generation
9,087,000 Military personnel served on active duty during the
Vietnam Era. Aug. 5, 1964 - May 7, 1975.
8,744,000 GIs Were on active duty during the war. Aug. 5, 1964 -
March 28, 1973
3,403,100 (Including 514,300 Offshore) Personnel served in the
Southeast Asia Theater (Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Flight Crews based in
Thailand, and sailors in adjacent South China Sea Waters.)
2,594,000 Personnel served within the borders of South Vietnam.
Jan. 1, 1965 - Mar. 28, 1973
Another 50,000 men served in Vietnam between 1960 and 1964.
Of the 2.6 million, between 1 - 1.6 million (40-60%) either fought
in combat, provided close support or were at least fairly regularly
exposed to enemy attack.
7,484 Women (6,250 or 83.5% were nurses) served in Vietnam.
Peak troop strength in Vietnam: 543,482 (April 30, 1969)
Hostile deaths: 47,378
Non-hostile deaths: 10,800
Total: 58,202 (Includes men formorley classified as MIA and
Mayaguez Casualties.) Men who have subsequently died of wounds account
for the changing total.
8 Nurses died - 1 was KIA
Married men killed: 17,539
61% of the men killed were 21 or younger..
Highest state death rate: West Virginia - 84.1 (National Average
58.9 for every 100,000 males in 1970.
Wounded: 303,704 --- 153,329 Hospitalized + 150,375 Injured
requiring no hospital care
Severely disabled: 75,000-----23,214 100% Disabled; 5,283 Lost
limb; 1,081 Sustained multiple amputations.
Amputation or crippling wounds to the lower extremities were 300%
higher than in WW II and 70% higher than Korea. Multiple amputations
occurred at the rate of 18.4% compared to 5.7% in WW II.
Missing in action: 2,338.
76% Of the men sent to Vietnam were from lower middle/working class
backgrounds
Three fourths had family incomes above the poverty level; 50% were
from middle income backgrounds..
Some 23% Of Vietnam Vets had fathers with proffessional,
managerial, or technical occupations.
79% Of the men who served Vietnam had a high school education or
better when they entered the military service. (63% Of Korean War Vets
and only 45% of WW II Vets had completed high school upon separation).
Deaths by region per 100,000 of population: South-31;
West-29.9; Midwest-28.4; Northeast-23.5.
88.4% Of the men who actually served in Vietnam were Caucasian; 10.6%
(275,000) were Black; 1% belonged to other races.
86.3% Of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasian (Includes
Hispanics); 12.5% (7,241) Were Black; 1.2% Belonged to other races.
170,000 Hispanics served in Vietnam; 3,070 (5.2% Of total) died there.
70% Of enlisted men killed were of Northwest European Descent.
86.8% Of the men who were killed as a result of hostile action were
Caucasian; 12.1% (5,711) Were Black; 1.1% Belonged to other races.
14.6% (1,530) Of Non-Combat deaths were among Blacks.
34% OF Blacks who enlisted volunteered for the combat arms.
Overall , Blacks suffered 12.5% of the deaths in Vietnam at a time when
the % of Blacks of military age was 13.5% of the total population.
Religion of dead; Protestant -- 64.4%; Catholic -- 28.9%;
Other/None 6.7%
82% Of Veterans who saw heavy combat strongly believe the war was
lost because of lack of political will.
Nearly 75% Of the public agrees it was a failure of political will
not of arms.
97% Of Vietnam Era Veterans were honorably discharged.
91% Of actual Vietnam War Veterans and 90% of those who saw heavy
combat are proud to have served their country.
66% Of Vietnam Vets say they would serve again if called upon.
87% Of the public now holds Vietnam Veterans in high esteem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-12 19:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3afb4f73-5b97-4adb-86a6-0cdf767064ce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #552608 |
just read that most inductees had the option of volunteering (retrorespective to being drafted > > was there (1971-72) at least 95% of the people there had not only > > volunteered for the Army, they also volunteered to go to Vietnam. > > wrong! using ESP again ? > > 25% were drafted, 1,728,344 men were drafted. > > > > > from > http://www.veteranshour.com/vietnam_war_statistics.htm > > POWs: 766 (114 Died in captivity.) > > 25% (648,500) Of total forces in country were draftees. > > Draftees accounted for 30.4% (17,725) of combat deaths in Vietnam. > > Reservist killed: 5,977 > > National Guard: 6,140 Served; 101 Died > > Total draftees (1965-73): 1,728,344. > > Actually served in Vietnam 38%. > > Marine Corps Draft: 42,633 > > Last man drafted June 30, 1973. > > > > > Vietnam Vets: 9.7% of their generation > > 9,087,000 Military personnel served on active duty during the > Vietnam Era. Aug. 5, 1964 - May 7, 1975. > > 8,744,000 GIs Were on active duty during the war. Aug. 5, 1964 - > March 28, 1973 > > 3,403,100 (Including 514,300 Offshore) Personnel served in the > Southeast Asia Theater (Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Flight Crews based in > Thailand, and sailors in adjacent South China Sea Waters.) > > 2,594,000 Personnel served within the borders of South Vietnam. > Jan. 1, 1965 - Mar. 28, 1973 > > > > > Another 50,000 men served in Vietnam between 1960 and 1964. > > Of the 2.6 million, between 1 - 1.6 million (40-60%) either fought > in combat, provided close support or were at least fairly regularly > exposed to enemy attack. > > 7,484 Women (6,250 or 83.5% were nurses) served in Vietnam. > > Peak troop strength in Vietnam: 543,482 (April 30, 1969) > > Hostile deaths: 47,378 > > Non-hostile deaths: 10,800 > > Total: 58,202 (Includes men formorley classified as MIA and > Mayaguez Casualties.) Men who have subsequently died of wounds account > for the changing total. > > 8 Nurses died - 1 was KIA > > > > Married men killed: 17,539 > > 61% of the men killed were 21 or younger.. > > Highest state death rate: West Virginia - 84.1 (National Average > 58.9 for every 100,000 males in 1970. > > Wounded: 303,704 --- 153,329 Hospitalized + 150,375 Injured > requiring no hospital care > > Severely disabled: 75,000-----23,214 100% Disabled; 5,283 Lost > limb; 1,081 Sustained multiple amputations. > > Amputation or crippling wounds to the lower extremities were 300% > higher than in WW II and 70% higher than Korea. Multiple amputations > occurred at the rate of 18.4% compared to 5.7% in WW II. > > Missing in action: 2,338. > > > > > 76% Of the men sent to Vietnam were from lower middle/working class > backgrounds > > Three fourths had family incomes above the poverty level; 50% were > from middle income backgrounds.. > > Some 23% Of Vietnam Vets had fathers with proffessional, > managerial, or technical occupations. > > 79% Of the men who served Vietnam had a high school education or > better when they entered the military service. (63% Of Korean War Vets > and only 45% of WW II Vets had completed high school upon separation). > > Deaths by region per 100,000 of population: South-31; > West-29.9; Midwest-28.4; Northeast-23.5. > > > > 88.4% Of the men who actually served in Vietnam were Caucasian; 10.6% > (275,000) were Black; 1% belonged to other races. > > 86.3% Of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasian (Includes > Hispanics); 12.5% (7,241) Were Black; 1.2% Belonged to other races. > > 170,000 Hispanics served in Vietnam; 3,070 (5.2% Of total) died there. > > 70% Of enlisted men killed were of Northwest European Descent. > > 86.8% Of the men who were killed as a result of hostile action were > Caucasian; 12.1% (5,711) Were Black; 1.1% Belonged to other races. > > 14.6% (1,530) Of Non-Combat deaths were among Blacks. > > 34% OF Blacks who enlisted volunteered for the combat arms. > > Overall , Blacks suffered 12.5% of the deaths in Vietnam at a time when > the % of Blacks of military age was 13.5% of the total population. > > > > Religion of dead; Protestant -- 64.4%; Catholic -- 28.9%; > Other/None 6.7% > > 82% Of Veterans who saw heavy combat strongly believe the war was > lost because of lack of political will. > > Nearly 75% Of the public agrees it was a failure of political will > not of arms. > > 97% Of Vietnam Era Veterans were honorably discharged. > > 91% Of actual Vietnam War Veterans and 90% of those who saw heavy > combat are proud to have served their country. > > 66% Of Vietnam Vets say they would serve again if called upon. > > 87% Of the public now holds Vietnam Veterans in high esteem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 09:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9cue2$uuk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551621 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>> >>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than half >>> of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a perpetrator >>> of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that 3.7 billion >>> people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>> >>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>> >>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in >>>> the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>> >>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn thing >>> they've ever said is a lie. >>> >>> Are you nuts? >> >> >> >> >> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >> Vietnam. > > Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government lies > about EVERYTHING. > >> >> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS NOT >> LIED about. > > Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school > teachers and students there are. Are you serious ? That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students they have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things like new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local governments almost daily. > > So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME things > and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming that they are > lying about EVERYTHING? > >> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 10:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n9d3cq$7k1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #551646 |
On 2/9/2016 8:54 AM, Bast wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>>> >>>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than half >>>> of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a perpetrator >>>> of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that 3.7 billion >>>> people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>>> >>>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>>> >>>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in >>>>> the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>>> >>>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn thing >>>> they've ever said is a lie. >>>> >>>> Are you nuts? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >>> Vietnam. >> >> Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government lies >> about EVERYTHING. >> >>> >>> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS NOT >>> LIED about. >> >> Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school >> teachers and students there are. > > Are you serious ? > That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students they > have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. > So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things like > new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. > > The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local > governments almost daily. > OK, so you are convinced that every government employee utters nothing but lies about the work they do, extending everywhere from the military to the counter people at the drivers license bureau, from scientific labs to firefighters, from diplomats to zoning boards. Not a single truth anywhere to be seen. >> >> So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME things >> and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming that they are >> lying about EVERYTHING? >> >>> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. > > > READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. > So how far does the lying go, then? Since anyone with a government job is lying, what about the people who work for corporations, like Exxon and Apple? Are they all lying about their work? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 13:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9d9jp$e7u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551674 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 2/9/2016 8:54 AM, Bast wrote: >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>>>> >>>>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than >>>>> half of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a >>>>> perpetrator of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that >>>>> 3.7 billion people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>>>> >>>>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>>>> >>>>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in >>>>>> the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>>>> >>>>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>>>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn thing >>>>> they've ever said is a lie. >>>>> >>>>> Are you nuts? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >>>> Vietnam. >>> >>> Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government lies >>> about EVERYTHING. >>> >>>> >>>> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS NOT >>>> LIED about. >>> >>> Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school >>> teachers and students there are. >> >> Are you serious ? >> That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students >> they have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. >> So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things >> like new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. >> >> The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local >> governments almost daily. >> > > OK, so you are convinced that every government employee utters nothing > but lies about the work they do, extending everywhere from the military > to the counter people at the drivers license bureau, from scientific > labs to firefighters, from diplomats to zoning boards. Not a single > truth anywhere to be seen. > >>> >>> So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME >>> things and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming that >>> they are lying about EVERYTHING? >>> >>>> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. >> >> >> READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. >> > > So how far does the lying go, then? Since anyone with a government job > is lying, what about the people who work for corporations, like Exxon > and Apple? Are they all lying about their work? You lie !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 12:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n9da1j$kir$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #551703 |
On 2/9/2016 12:05 PM, Bast wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 2/9/2016 8:54 AM, Bast wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>>>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than >>>>>> half of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a >>>>>> perpetrator of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that >>>>>> 3.7 billion people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>>>>> >>>>>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>>>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in >>>>>>> the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>>>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>>>>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn thing >>>>>> they've ever said is a lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you nuts? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >>>>> Vietnam. >>>> >>>> Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government lies >>>> about EVERYTHING. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS NOT >>>>> LIED about. >>>> >>>> Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school >>>> teachers and students there are. >>> >>> Are you serious ? >>> That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students >>> they have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. >>> So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things >>> like new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. >>> >>> The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local >>> governments almost daily. >>> >> >> OK, so you are convinced that every government employee utters nothing >> but lies about the work they do, extending everywhere from the military >> to the counter people at the drivers license bureau, from scientific >> labs to firefighters, from diplomats to zoning boards. Not a single >> truth anywhere to be seen. >> >>>> >>>> So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME >>>> things and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming that >>>> they are lying about EVERYTHING? >>>> >>>>> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. >>> >>> >>> READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. >>> >> >> So how far does the lying go, then? Since anyone with a government job >> is lying, what about the people who work for corporations, like Exxon >> and Apple? Are they all lying about their work? > > You lie ! About what? You've said that "THEY [the government and its employees] LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING." Then I asked you a question, which can't be a lie. But let's just take your comment about me at face value. If you're going to say I'm lying too, then is there ANYONE you can point to that isn't a perpetual, compulsive liar? Anyone at all? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mknkbbpuhi8e3k0340qjo2r8pfeugdheak@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551703 |
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:05:26 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 2/9/2016 8:54 AM, Bast wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>>>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than >>>>>> half of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a >>>>>> perpetrator of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that >>>>>> 3.7 billion people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>>>>> >>>>>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>>>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in >>>>>>> the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>>>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>>>>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn thing >>>>>> they've ever said is a lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you nuts? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >>>>> Vietnam. >>>> >>>> Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government lies >>>> about EVERYTHING. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS NOT >>>>> LIED about. >>>> >>>> Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school >>>> teachers and students there are. >>> >>> Are you serious ? >>> That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students >>> they have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. >>> So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things >>> like new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. >>> >>> The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local >>> governments almost daily. >>> >> >> OK, so you are convinced that every government employee utters nothing >> but lies about the work they do, extending everywhere from the military >> to the counter people at the drivers license bureau, from scientific >> labs to firefighters, from diplomats to zoning boards. Not a single >> truth anywhere to be seen. >> >>>> >>>> So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME >>>> things and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming that >>>> they are lying about EVERYTHING? >>>> >>>>> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. >>> >>> >>> READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. >>> >> >> So how far does the lying go, then? Since anyone with a government job >> is lying, what about the people who work for corporations, like Exxon >> and Apple? Are they all lying about their work? > > > >You lie ! That's a win for you, Odd Bodkin. Bast when cornered by her idiocy attempts to dismiss and disregard the conversation. It's a known pattern for her.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 07:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9f9jb$s3c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551809 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:05:26 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> On 2/9/2016 8:54 AM, Bast wrote: >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>>>>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than >>>>>>> half of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a >>>>>>> perpetrator of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that >>>>>>> 3.7 billion people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>>>>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight >>>>>>>> in the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>>>>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>>>>>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn >>>>>>> thing they've ever said is a lie. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you nuts? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >>>>>> Vietnam. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government >>>>> lies about EVERYTHING. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS >>>>>> NOT LIED about. >>>>> >>>>> Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school >>>>> teachers and students there are. >>>> >>>> Are you serious ? >>>> That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students >>>> they have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. >>>> So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things >>>> like new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. >>>> >>>> The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local >>>> governments almost daily. >>>> >>> >>> OK, so you are convinced that every government employee utters nothing >>> but lies about the work they do, extending everywhere from the >>> military to the counter people at the drivers license bureau, from >>> scientific labs to firefighters, from diplomats to zoning boards. Not >>> a single truth anywhere to be seen. >>> >>>>> >>>>> So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME >>>>> things and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming >>>>> that they are lying about EVERYTHING? >>>>> >>>>>> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. >>>> >>>> >>>> READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. >>>> >>> >>> So how far does the lying go, then? Since anyone with a government job >>> is lying, what about the people who work for corporations, like Exxon >>> and Apple? Are they all lying about their work? >> >> >> >> You lie ! > > That's a win for you, Odd Bodkin. Bast when cornered by her idiocy > attempts to dismiss and disregard the conversation. It's a known > pattern for her. And you are the BIGGEST LIAR,.....well,...next to ol' hvac. And now send ISIS boogy-man after you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2rbnbbp129ec4olbmv03qee6i0sgspqsee@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551991 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:17:28 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:05:26 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 2/9/2016 8:54 AM, Bast wrote: >>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 2/8/2016 7:19 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/8/2016 4:34 PM, Bast wrote: >>>>>>>>> Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of >>>>>>>>> NASA's hoaxes ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm curious about your stats here. You are saying that more than >>>>>>>> half of the world's 7.4 billion people believe that NASA is a >>>>>>>> perpetrator of massive hoaxes. Where do you have data showing that >>>>>>>> 3.7 billion people believe that NASA has committed massive hoaxes? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all >>>>>>>>> knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight >>>>>>>>> in the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" >>>>>>>>> You will even get a sticky gold star. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, thanks. And yes, I do believe that the government has lied ON >>>>>>>> OCCASION. But this is not the same thing as saying every damn >>>>>>>> thing they've ever said is a lie. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you nuts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look up Gulf Of Tonkin,....and ask why so many kids had to die in >>>>>>> Vietnam. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, they lied about that. This doesn't mean that the government >>>>>> lies about EVERYTHING. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hell,......I DARE YOU to show us here what the US government HAS >>>>>>> NOT LIED about. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. It has not lied about its figures about how many public school >>>>>> teachers and students there are. >>>>> >>>>> Are you serious ? >>>>> That local governments do not fudge figures about how many students >>>>> they have or how many teachers ACTUALLY teaching. >>>>> So they get more grants. And justify higher budgets that go to things >>>>> like new pools for principals or for the politicians themselves. >>>>> >>>>> The papers are filled with reports of corruption and waste by local >>>>> governments almost daily. >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK, so you are convinced that every government employee utters nothing >>>> but lies about the work they do, extending everywhere from the >>>> military to the counter people at the drivers license bureau, from >>>> scientific labs to firefighters, from diplomats to zoning boards. Not >>>> a single truth anywhere to be seen. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So now if you will allow that the government might lie about SOME >>>>>> things and not lie about other things, then why are you assuming >>>>>> that they are lying about EVERYTHING? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Including 9/11 and right up to the present day. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> READ MY LIPS,...THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So how far does the lying go, then? Since anyone with a government job >>>> is lying, what about the people who work for corporations, like Exxon >>>> and Apple? Are they all lying about their work? >>> >>> >>> >>> You lie ! >> >> That's a win for you, Odd Bodkin. Bast when cornered by her idiocy >> attempts to dismiss and disregard the conversation. It's a known >> pattern for her. > > > > >And you are the BIGGEST LIAR,.....well,...next to ol' hvac. Your behavior speaks for itself. You were speaking with Odd Bodkin. You ran away from his questions. Like you always do. You still haven't answered his questions. Conclusion: The liar is Bast. >And now send ISIS boogy-man after you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 22:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312329e37e1ed0ee98c4f7@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #551400 |
In article <n9b4vh$dmh$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <n9a62u$d44$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> Michael Moroney wrote: > >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>> > >>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's > >>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE > >>>> fatality. > >>> > >>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Not in any appolo mission. > >> They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't > >> even supposed to be a "flight" > >> > >> NASA couldn't even keep astronauts alive ON EARTH. > >> But it was well known that Grissom, was already exposing the lies of > >> Apollo,....so he needed to disappear. > > > > Another conspiracy? How did they do all of them, but only you, um, > > special people know about it? > > > > > > Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of NASA's > hoaxes ? The world of kOOks, not sane people. > And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all knowing and > powerful the Amerikka is. When did we/them do that? > > But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in the > middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" > You will even get a sticky gold star. Being a soldier is for young people. You would make an excellent subject for psychoactive drug experimentation. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <15djbbhhfae45jv6k95qmp0bq31s230vut@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551400 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:34:06 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>BDK wrote:
>> In article <n9a62u$d44$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>>
>>> Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's
>>>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE
>>>>> fatality.
>>>>
>>>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967?
>>>
>>>
>>> Not in any appolo mission.
>>> They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't
>>> even supposed to be a "flight"
>>>
>>> NASA couldn't even keep astronauts alive ON EARTH.
>>> But it was well known that Grissom, was already exposing the lies of
>>> Apollo,....so he needed to disappear.
>>
>> Another conspiracy? How did they do all of them, but only you, um,
>> special people know about it?
>
>
>Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of NASA's
>hoaxes ?
You'll have no problem providing valid, verifiable evidence then.
If you're lying, you'll offer only avoidance, if you offer
anything at all.
>And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all knowing and
>powerful the Amerikka is.
You and Run Away Roger are only two people.
>
>But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in the
>middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks"
>You will even get a sticky gold star.
So why aren't you there fighting?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9aml9$757$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #551219 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >Michael Moroney wrote: >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. >> >> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? >Not in any appolo mission. >They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't even >supposed to be a "flight" This rocket/crew combination, later designated Apollo 1, was scheduled to fly February 21, 1967, as a low earth orbit flight, the first manned test of the then-new Apollo/Saturn 5 rocket. If everything went well, it would have spent as long as two weeks in orbit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 14:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ouphbb9vleh5brjkblhl18jttj0djfg1id@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551310 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>Michael Moroney wrote: >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. >>> >>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? > >>Not in any appolo mission. >>They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't even >>supposed to be a "flight" > >This rocket/crew combination, later designated Apollo 1, was scheduled to >fly February 21, 1967, as a low earth orbit flight, the first manned test >of the then-new Apollo/Saturn 5 rocket. If everything went well, it would >have spent as long as two weeks in orbit. How disgusting the cavalier attitude of Bast at the loss of three US Astronauts. My father was an electrical engineer and was contracted by NASA to come in and work on the investigation of the Apollo 1 fire. He never spoke of the investigate very much but he did say he listened to the Astronauts as they sat in their capsule. I believe the transmission haunted him until he died.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 17:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9b52r$e17$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551325 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC), > moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>> >>>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >>>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE >>>>> fatality. >>>> >>>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? >> >>> Not in any appolo mission. >>> They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't >>> even supposed to be a "flight" >> >> This rocket/crew combination, later designated Apollo 1, was scheduled >> to fly February 21, 1967, as a low earth orbit flight, the first >> manned test of the then-new Apollo/Saturn 5 rocket. If everything >> went well, it would have spent as long as two weeks in orbit. > > How disgusting the cavalier attitude of Bast at the loss of three US > Astronauts. My father was an electrical engineer and was contracted > by NASA to come in and work on the investigation of the Apollo 1 fire. > He never spoke of the investigate very much but he did say he listened > to the Astronauts as they sat in their capsule. I believe the > transmission haunted him until he died. So if you father was an electrical engineer,....what happened to you ? Recessive stupid genes ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <e87ibbtm48m9hjf6imb4d0t1jd9ht404bt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551402 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:35:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC), >> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >> >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >>>>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE >>>>>> fatality. >>>>> >>>>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? >>> >>>> Not in any appolo mission. >>>> They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't >>>> even supposed to be a "flight" >>> >>> This rocket/crew combination, later designated Apollo 1, was scheduled >>> to fly February 21, 1967, as a low earth orbit flight, the first >>> manned test of the then-new Apollo/Saturn 5 rocket. If everything >>> went well, it would have spent as long as two weeks in orbit. >> >> How disgusting the cavalier attitude of Bast at the loss of three US >> Astronauts. My father was an electrical engineer and was contracted >> by NASA to come in and work on the investigation of the Apollo 1 fire. >> He never spoke of the investigate very much but he did say he listened >> to the Astronauts as they sat in their capsule. I believe the >> transmission haunted him until he died. > > > > >So if you father was an electrical engineer,....what happened to you ? After your lying about being an electrical engineer I would have though with all the hints I smacked you with that you'd KNOW what my degree I earned. An EE chimed in on the thread and laughed at your stupidity and pointed out a very specific clue I'd been giving you. But you're too stupid to even get the hint.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 00:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9bd5e$qor$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #551411 |
Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:35:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >wrote: >>So if you father was an electrical engineer,....what happened to you ? >After your lying about being an electrical engineer I would have >though with all the hints I smacked you with that you'd KNOW what my >degree I earned. >An EE chimed in on the thread and laughed at your stupidity and >pointed out a very specific clue I'd been giving you. >But you're too stupid to even get the hint. <bows>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1enkbb1f3ht37t9au0vjfer5f400r3fu3m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551441 |
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:50:54 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:35:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>wrote: > >>>So if you father was an electrical engineer,....what happened to you ? > >>After your lying about being an electrical engineer I would have >>though with all the hints I smacked you with that you'd KNOW what my >>degree I earned. > >>An EE chimed in on the thread and laughed at your stupidity and >>pointed out a very specific clue I'd been giving you. > >>But you're too stupid to even get the hint. > ><bows> Was that you? I had forgotten the gentleman's name. That was a fun exchange wasn't it? :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 22:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9dou5$epi$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #551805 |
Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:50:54 +0000 (UTC), >moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >>Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:35:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>wrote: >> >>>>So if you father was an electrical engineer,....what happened to you ? >> >>>After your lying about being an electrical engineer I would have >>>though with all the hints I smacked you with that you'd KNOW what my >>>degree I earned. >> >>>An EE chimed in on the thread and laughed at your stupidity and >>>pointed out a very specific clue I'd been giving you. >> >>>But you're too stupid to even get the hint. >> >><bows> >Was that you? I had forgotten the gentleman's name. That was a fun >exchange wasn't it? :) Yes it was. I so wanted to tell Bast to "google it!" or drop some hints but wanted to see how long it would take her to figure out to do so, and attempt to save face. She never did...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 07:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9f9o2$sl7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551844 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:50:54 +0000 (UTC), >> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > >>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>> >>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:35:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> So if you father was an electrical engineer,....what happened to >>>>> you ? >>> >>>> After your lying about being an electrical engineer I would have >>>> though with all the hints I smacked you with that you'd KNOW what my >>>> degree I earned. >>> >>>> An EE chimed in on the thread and laughed at your stupidity and >>>> pointed out a very specific clue I'd been giving you. >>> >>>> But you're too stupid to even get the hint. >>> >>> <bows> > >> Was that you? I had forgotten the gentleman's name. That was a fun >> exchange wasn't it? :) > > Yes it was. I so wanted to tell Bast to "google it!" or drop some hints > but wanted to see how long it would take her to figure out to do so, and > attempt to save face. She never did... Awwww Gosh,......I didn't even know you cared. However I really don't care what trolls on the internet think about me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web