Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551058 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 366 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 08:21 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-07 10:38 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 ˌsōlər ˈpleksəs <solar@plexus.org> - 2016-02-07 17:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:36 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 08:33 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-08 01:35 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 13:45 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:30 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 02:27 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:03 -0800
Re: whOOsh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:46 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-07 20:28 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 13:53 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-07 21:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 22:35 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:36 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 15:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 23:05 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 16:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-11 07:54 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 22:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 04:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 08:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:50 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 21:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-15 01:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 13:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 02:43 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 23:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
ha, yummy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:16 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:11 +0000
lunarstuff; who wasn't really theresville noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 14:32 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:03 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:14 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 22:46 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:50 -0600
misson implausibly noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 19:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:59 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 01:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 15:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:43 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Guess Who <don'temailme@youputz.cpom> - 2016-02-13 15:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-13 16:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-13 21:22 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-16 08:24 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-17 06:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:19 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-18 10:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 20:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 17:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 17:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 16:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 15:02 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 00:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 02:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:54 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:48 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 17:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 18:27 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 20:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 13:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 18:09 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 19:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 12:57 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:21 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 16:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:17 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 06:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:39 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-12 15:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:16 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:05 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:17 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 18:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 17:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-11 14:53 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:07 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:40 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 08:34 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 09:41 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 10:01 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 14:25 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:05 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:35 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:38 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 10:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 15:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 16:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 17:15 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 01:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 14:13 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 18:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 02:36 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 23:23 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 00:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-13 16:42 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 17:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:26 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:11 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-08 04:59 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-08 16:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 00:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 12:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:20 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 05:27 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:27 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 02:41 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 16:49 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 13:22 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:30 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 21:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:18 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:47 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:37 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 04:51 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:01 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 18:49 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 17:19 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 19:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 12:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 18:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-10 03:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 12:57 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:47 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600
Page 17 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 Next page →
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 04:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <21349e98-e973-4415-b0ac-a1dda428967c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #551564 |
Not THAT amazing, HFUKT; you frickin stalk him full time. ----------- Meh. It's a living
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 04:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a437f1e4-d20b-4336-8952-aaa881d5ec83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #551573 |
"A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood." Haha. They sent people out to collect basalt-type rocks and then magnetized them. But the idiots included a piece of a fossilized tree from the Arizona area. Of course, govt supporters will say someone got the fossil and switched it with the "moon Rock". Those bad hoaxers! Bad! Bad!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 04:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2cd2bfe5-e087-4ab3-906c-f4fbb8e98b40@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #551575 |
Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood." ------------- All that proves is that there are trees on the moon. Duh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 09:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wZmuy.289605$8P4.147851@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #551581 |
On 02/09/2016 07:51 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
>
> Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood."
> -------------
>
> All that proves is that there are trees on the moon. Duh
Wait a minute. Are museum curators incompetent? Are they stupid? (More
stupid than HVAC...that is an impossibility) Are they laying? Did the US
government slip some fake "moon rocks" in the "gifts" from the supposed
moon shot?
Note that HVAC refuses to discuss this problem. He just puts his fingers
in his ears and sings: La La LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
Tell us what you "believe" hvac! Did the gummint con the museum?
I thought you told us that one can ALWAYS trust your government?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 09:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rkmuy.212068$Bz5.63084@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #551560 |
On 02/09/2016 06:18 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
> HVAC now admits he believes in gummint mind control?
> Feed any innocent citizens drugs without them knowing HVAC?
> I hope they don't kill themselves like the others you "tested".
> -------------
>
> Amazing. I don't even mention anyone in particular and BJ assumes that it's him. Then he goes off on one of his childish rants
>
HVAC first admits he believes in government mind control! And now wishes
he could use it on me? I never mentioned it was being used on me (even
though it is...just turn on your TV for examples)
Notice how he changed the subject from the proven facts of government
giving unsuspecting citizens drugs in experiments without their
knowledge or permission. HVAC doesn't think his boss need permission to
do anything. Even kill people.
Professional liar.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 17:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v05ibbdel58ujcsmb3jaffmrslmnbrqsoi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551321 |
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:03:18 -0500, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:29:03 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 >>>> >>>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was a >>>> sham and probably hundreds of other things too. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. >> >> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >> Apollo 11 crew? >> >> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. > >And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon is? Let me write it again for you: How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the Apollo 11 crew? It isn't clear to you by the questions asked?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 01:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9bdoe$qor$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #551321 |
benj <nobody@gmail.com> writes: >On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >> Apollo 11 crew? >> >> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. >And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon is? Simple. The signal was very weak so you would need a highly directional high gain antenna to pick it up. Being directional, it had to be pointed just right. Point it at the moon and you heard astronauts. Point it anywhere else and you heard nothing but static. Think of those TV satellite dishes people have. They have to be pointed just right to receive the signal from the satellite. Often a windstorm will knock them off enough that there is no TV until someone re-aims them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 21:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9bh7i$mf9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551446 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > benj <nobody@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >>> Apollo 11 crew? >>> >>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. > >> And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon >> is? > > Simple. The signal was very weak so you would need a highly directional > high gain antenna to pick it up. Being directional, it had to be > pointed just right. Point it at the moon and you heard astronauts. > Point it anywhere else and you heard nothing but static. Think of > those TV satellite dishes people have. They have to be pointed just > right to receive the signal from the satellite. Often a windstorm will > knock them off enough that there is no TV until someone re-aims them. Yup,... and those TV signals come from studios in orbit manned with technicians and performers who live up there in the satellite full time ? You are only proving that satelllites with receivers and transmitters existed in the late 60's and 70's,....No one is disputing that fact. Of course it could easily be done with a lander on the moon. That simply rebroadcasts scripted signals it recieves from earth. No human intervention needed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7b55783a-39ae-47d1-a84f-85a2469025c5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #551467 |
You are only proving that satelllites with receivers and transmitters existed in the late 60's and 70's,....No one is disputing that fact. Of course it could easily be done with a lander on the moon. That simply rebroadcasts scripted signals it recieves from earth. No human intervention needed. ------------ Why not just go all in? There is no such thing as space. Above the atmosphere is a crystal shell enclosing the earth. On it are LED stars, moons and planets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 22:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31232b8032780c9398c4fb@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #551467 |
In article <n9bh7i$mf9$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > benj <nobody@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > > >>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? > >>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators > >>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the > >>> Apollo 11 crew? > >>> > >>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. > > > >> And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon > >> is? > > > > Simple. The signal was very weak so you would need a highly directional > > high gain antenna to pick it up. Being directional, it had to be > > pointed just right. Point it at the moon and you heard astronauts. > > Point it anywhere else and you heard nothing but static. Think of > > those TV satellite dishes people have. They have to be pointed just > > right to receive the signal from the satellite. Often a windstorm will > > knock them off enough that there is no TV until someone re-aims them. > > > > > > > Yup,... and those TV signals come from studios in orbit manned with > technicians and performers who live up there in the satellite full time ? > > You are only proving that satelllites with receivers and transmitters > existed in the late 60's and 70's,....No one is disputing that fact. > Of course it could easily be done with a lander on the moon. That simply > rebroadcasts scripted signals it recieves from earth. > No human intervention needed. Now you're just being stupid on purpose. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <j8djbbtl4bttqh1pqe6nfvte6t38lu7glr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551467 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:03:11 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Michael Moroney wrote:
>> benj <nobody@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>
>>>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union?
>>>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators
>>>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the
>>>> Apollo 11 crew?
>>>>
>>>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast.
>>
>>> And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon
>>> is?
>>
>> Simple. The signal was very weak so you would need a highly directional
>> high gain antenna to pick it up. Being directional, it had to be
>> pointed just right. Point it at the moon and you heard astronauts.
>> Point it anywhere else and you heard nothing but static. Think of
>> those TV satellite dishes people have. They have to be pointed just
>> right to receive the signal from the satellite. Often a windstorm will
>> knock them off enough that there is no TV until someone re-aims them.
>
>
>
>Yup,... and those TV signals come from studios in orbit manned with
>technicians and performers who live up there in the satellite full time ?
>
>You are only proving that satelllites with receivers and transmitters
>existed in the late 60's and 70's,....No one is disputing that fact.
>Of course it could easily be done with a lander on the moon. That simply
>rebroadcasts scripted signals it recieves from earth.
>No human intervention needed.
I await your valid, verifiable evidence that what you present
occurred in reality.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <b3djbb1jhdf0kdcqn2on7679ebgh3c5ltq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551321 |
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:03:18 -0500, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:29:03 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rocky wrote:
>>>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4
>>>>
>>>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was a
>>>> sham and probably hundreds of other things too.
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed.
>>
>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union?
>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators
>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the
>> Apollo 11 crew?
>>
>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast.
>
>And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon is?
Had they not, the Soviets would have exposed the fraud.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 16:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r8okbbh0i8odhh4hv2h5hvifrtkl10c6h7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551542 |
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:42:32 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:03:18 -0500, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 02/08/2016 01:53 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:29:03 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 >>>>> >>>>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was a >>>>> sham and probably hundreds of other things too. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. >>> >>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >>> Apollo 11 crew? >>> >>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. >> >>And the way you know the Apollo 11 crew was transmitting from the moon is? > > Had they not, the Soviets would have exposed the fraud. And danced while did it too! :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 20:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9bgo0$l7e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #551316 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:29:03 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> Rocky wrote: >>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 >>> >>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was >>> a sham and probably hundreds of other things too. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> >> >> >> >> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. > > How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? > Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators > throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the > Apollo 11 crew? > > Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth. I'm never going to be able to teach you here. Or do you think that Satellite TV is actually broadcast from studios in space ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 16:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ssnkbbt2v678i4910q2i369oa0v28960hp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551466 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:54:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:29:03 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 >>>> >>>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was >>>> a sham and probably hundreds of other things too. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. >> >> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >> Apollo 11 crew? >> >> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. > > > > > >If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth. >I'm never going to be able to teach you here. Satellites orbiting above earth cannot duplicate the time lapse in the transmissions from the moon and back to the earth. Earth satellites are in an orbit at ~ 22,000 miles up in space. Now you guess how far away the earth is from the moon and how long it takes for transmissions to be sent and received between the two. You cannot duplicate the radio signals using a satellite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9don9$epi$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #551816 |
Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:54:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >wrote: >>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. >>> >>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >>> Apollo 11 crew? >>> >>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. >> >> >> >> >> >>If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth. >>I'm never going to be able to teach you here. >Satellites orbiting above earth cannot duplicate the time lapse in the >transmissions from the moon and back to the earth. Earth satellites >are in an orbit at ~ 22,000 miles up in space. Now you guess how far >away the earth is from the moon and how long it takes for >transmissions to be sent and received between the two. You cannot >duplicate the radio signals using a satellite. Exactly. The time delays will show the distance to what's being listened to. So not only was what the radio amateurs listening to in the direction of the moon, it was at the distance of the moon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 18:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <umtkbbhl4tjarcqv54tq0qe4iate447fi7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551836 |
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:20:25 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:54:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>wrote: > >>>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. >>>> >>>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >>>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >>>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >>>> Apollo 11 crew? >>>> >>>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth. >>>I'm never going to be able to teach you here. > >>Satellites orbiting above earth cannot duplicate the time lapse in the >>transmissions from the moon and back to the earth. Earth satellites >>are in an orbit at ~ 22,000 miles up in space. Now you guess how far >>away the earth is from the moon and how long it takes for >>transmissions to be sent and received between the two. You cannot >>duplicate the radio signals using a satellite. > >Exactly. The time delays will show the distance to what's being listened >to. So not only was what the radio amateurs listening to in the direction >of the moon, it was at the distance of the moon. 100% spot on! And you said it better than I. Not that there is any hope Best will understand it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a18lbbd2at3l09rc72lftvk98draojpjmr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551881 |
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:33:03 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:20:25 +0000 (UTC),
>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
>>Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>
>>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:54:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed.
>>>>>
>>>>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union?
>>>>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators
>>>>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the
>>>>> Apollo 11 crew?
>>>>>
>>>>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth.
>>>>I'm never going to be able to teach you here.
>>
>>>Satellites orbiting above earth cannot duplicate the time lapse in the
>>>transmissions from the moon and back to the earth. Earth satellites
>>>are in an orbit at ~ 22,000 miles up in space. Now you guess how far
>>>away the earth is from the moon and how long it takes for
>>>transmissions to be sent and received between the two. You cannot
>>>duplicate the radio signals using a satellite.
>>
>>Exactly. The time delays will show the distance to what's being listened
>>to. So not only was what the radio amateurs listening to in the direction
>>of the moon, it was at the distance of the moon.
>
>100% spot on! And you said it better than I. Not that there is any
>hope Best will understand it.
I anticipate a claim that the satellites delayed re-broadcast
long enough to make it appear as if the transmissions came from the
moon. I don't see any other option for her.
Well, Bast could admit she's wrong. But that will never happen.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fsbnbbhlefupl0uo623eca6umtnrh6bflc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #551975 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:41:15 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:33:03 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:20:25 +0000 (UTC), >>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >> >>>Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>> >>>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:54:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. >>>>>> >>>>>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union? >>>>>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators >>>>>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the >>>>>> Apollo 11 crew? >>>>>> >>>>>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth. >>>>>I'm never going to be able to teach you here. >>> >>>>Satellites orbiting above earth cannot duplicate the time lapse in the >>>>transmissions from the moon and back to the earth. Earth satellites >>>>are in an orbit at ~ 22,000 miles up in space. Now you guess how far >>>>away the earth is from the moon and how long it takes for >>>>transmissions to be sent and received between the two. You cannot >>>>duplicate the radio signals using a satellite. >>> >>>Exactly. The time delays will show the distance to what's being listened >>>to. So not only was what the radio amateurs listening to in the direction >>>of the moon, it was at the distance of the moon. >> >>100% spot on! And you said it better than I. Not that there is any >>hope Best will understand it. > > I anticipate a claim that the satellites delayed re-broadcast >long enough to make it appear as if the transmissions came from the >moon. I don't see any other option for her. > Well, Bast could admit she's wrong. But that will never happen. I have no doubt Bast will try that option. I've debated this subject with kooks on the net before. They all try and claim there are some satellites orbiting the earth which can transmit back conversations and have the correct timing, etc... Wonder how Bast would explain Apollo 11 and the transmissions from that mission? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <8qmobb1c3noq89k8s6ikmfephb9bje3m87@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #552105 |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:46:21 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:41:15 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:33:03 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:20:25 +0000 (UTC),
>>>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:54:53 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course the moon landings were hoaxed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How then do you explain the response and reaction of the Soviet Union?
>>>>>>> Or that matter the thousands of thousands of amateur radio operators
>>>>>>> throughout the world who monitored the radio transmissions from the
>>>>>>> Apollo 11 crew?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Explain the radio transmissions Rocky or Bast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you can't figure out how satellites bounce back signals that originated on earth.
>>>>>>I'm never going to be able to teach you here.
>>>>
>>>>>Satellites orbiting above earth cannot duplicate the time lapse in the
>>>>>transmissions from the moon and back to the earth. Earth satellites
>>>>>are in an orbit at ~ 22,000 miles up in space. Now you guess how far
>>>>>away the earth is from the moon and how long it takes for
>>>>>transmissions to be sent and received between the two. You cannot
>>>>>duplicate the radio signals using a satellite.
>>>>
>>>>Exactly. The time delays will show the distance to what's being listened
>>>>to. So not only was what the radio amateurs listening to in the direction
>>>>of the moon, it was at the distance of the moon.
>>>
>>>100% spot on! And you said it better than I. Not that there is any
>>>hope Best will understand it.
>>
>> I anticipate a claim that the satellites delayed re-broadcast
>>long enough to make it appear as if the transmissions came from the
>>moon. I don't see any other option for her.
>> Well, Bast could admit she's wrong. But that will never happen.
>
>I have no doubt Bast will try that option. I've debated this subject
>with kooks on the net before. They all try and claim there are some
>satellites orbiting the earth which can transmit back conversations
>and have the correct timing, etc...
>
>Wonder how Bast would explain Apollo 11 and the transmissions from
>that mission? LOL
My guess is she will ignore any references to them.
But time will tell.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web