Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #546494 > unrolled thread

Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 10:20 -0600
    Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 10:06 -0800
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 12:13 -0600
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 12:17 -0600
        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 23:00 -0800
        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 03:40 -0800
          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 03:48 -0800
            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-20 07:00 -0800
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 22:45 -0800
                Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 10:19 -0800
                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:22 -0800
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 14:51 -0800
                      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:18 -0800
                        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:26 -0500
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:24 -0500
                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 00:56 -0800
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-23 10:03 -0800
                      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:26 -0800
                        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-23 14:48 -0800
                          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 22:05 -0800
                            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-23 23:35 -0800
                              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:14 -0800
                                Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-24 11:41 -0800
                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-01-23 07:45 -0600
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 10:37 -0800
                      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-01-23 13:07 -0600
                        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 12:27 -0800
                          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-01-23 16:47 -0600
                            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-24 14:30 -0800
            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 22:14 -0800
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-23 23:35 -0800
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:56 -0800
    Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 06:13 -0800
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:32 -0500
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:43 -0800
        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:26 -0500
    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 15:04 -0800
    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-24 07:46 -0800
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 14:14 -0600
        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-25 06:39 -0800
          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:52 -0600
            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 07:53 -0800
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:17 -0800
            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 06:42 -0800
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 08:53 -0600
          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:58 -0600
            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 06:54 -0800
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:02 -0600
                Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 13:17 -0800
                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 15:21 -0600
                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 15:25 -0600
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 16:56 -0800
                      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 07:33 -0600
                        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-28 08:29 -0800
                          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:25 -0600
                            Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-29 06:36 -0800
                              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 08:44 -0600
                              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 09:54 -0600
                                Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-31 07:17 -0800
                                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:49 -0600
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:32 -0600
                Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 13:22 -0800
                  Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 15:28 -0600
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 17:01 -0800
                      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 23:05 -0800
                      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 07:52 -0600
                        Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-28 08:07 -0800
                          Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:21 -0600
                    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 23:01 -0800
              Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 14:33 -0500
      Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:37 -0600
        edit sujet noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 12:38 -0800
          Re: edit sujet noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:40 -0800
          Re: edit sujet "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 00:52 -0800
            Re: edit sujet noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:33 -0800
    Re: Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-28 13:30 -0800

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#546494 — Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it?

Does space mean emptiness? How do you describe it?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hGwC-9wtSg


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#546509

Space is what atoms are made from and
contains atoms in various configurations.
Its distribution is like atoms'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546512

On 1/19/16 12:06 PM, john wrote:
> Space is what atoms are made from...

   No-Atoms are made of matter with the properties of mass, charge, etc.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546516

On 1/19/2016 12:06 PM, john wrote:
> Space is what atoms are made from and
> contains atoms in various configurations.
> Its distribution is like atoms'.
>

Space doesn't mean emptiness per se, no.
First of all, you have to state what that emptiness means when you use 
the word. Empty of wood? Empty of matter? Empty of properties? Empty of 
everything, including its own existence?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546679

On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 8:17:21 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 1/19/2016 12:06 PM, john wrote:
> > Space is what atoms are made from and
> > contains atoms in various configurations.
> > Its distribution is like atoms'.
> >
> 
> Space doesn't mean emptiness per se, no.
> First of all, you have to state what that emptiness means when you use 
> the word. Empty of wood? Empty of matter? Empty of properties? Empty of 
> everything, including its own existence?
> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

=================================
idiot anonymous P D blockhead parrot !!

space is nothing and have no properties -what soever
EXCEPT HOSTING MASS !!
---
WHILE IT IS** MASS** 
THAT IS THE MAIN 'HERO'' 'OF PHYSICS !!

Y.Porat
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546695

On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 8:17:21 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 1/19/2016 12:06 PM, john wrote:
> > Space is what atoms are made from and
> > contains atoms in various configurations.
> > Its distribution is like atoms'.
> >
> 
> Space doesn't mean emptiness per se, no.
> First of all, you have to state what that emptiness means when you use 
> the word. Empty of wood? Empty of matter? Empty of properties?

==========================
yes blockhead parrot P D !!

there are in space locations empty of anything !
and if so 
empty of any property !!
except the ability to host*** mass **

2
HAD THERE **NOT*BEEN LOCATION OF COMPLETE EMPTINESS 
**NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COLD BE DONE !!
 

that is an historic finding/postulate of mine

Y.Porat
no need to be a genius in order to understand it !!
=====================
================ 
in location that there is mass 
ALL THE KNOWN PROPERTIES  OF PHYSICS  ARE THERE !!
======================================================
NO MASS - THE **ONLY**MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !!
===================================================

 Empty of 
> everything, including its own existence?
======
SEE JUST ABOVE !
is it too complicated for a genius like you ??!!
-----
ATB
Y.Porat
=======================


> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546696

2 
HAD THERE **NOT*BEEN LOCATION OF COMPLETE EMPTINESS 
**NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COLD BE DONE !! 

that is an historic finding/postulate of mine 
------------

Of course it is! You and your Y. Circle Jerk theory rank right up there with Bert and his G=EMC^2 theory.

Both of you are self aggrandizing for good cause!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546722

"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:4093c549-9cef-49c8-be9d-1a819928e3f5@googlegroups.com...
>
> 2
> HAD THERE **NOT*BEEN LOCATION OF COMPLETE EMPTINESS
> **NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COLD BE DONE !!
>
> that is an historic finding/postulate of mine
> ------------
>
> Of course it is! You and your Y. Circle Jerk theory rank right up there 
> with Bert and his G=EMC^2 theory.
>
> Both of you (Porat & Full-Swine Glazier) are self aggrandizing for good 
> cause!
>
It must make them feel good about themselves.
Like your gig and gag does to and for yourself.
Nothing wrong with that... ROTFLMAO...ahaha

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546928

On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 5:04:39 PM UTC+2, hanson wrote:
> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:4093c549-9cef-49c8-be9d-1a819928e3f5@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > 2
> > HAD THERE **NOT*BEEN LOCATION OF COMPLETE EMPTINESS
> > **NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COLD BE DONE !!
> >
> > that is an historic finding/postulate of mine
> > ------------
> >
> > Of course it is! You and your Y. Circle Jerk theory rank right up there 
> > with Bert and his G=EMC^2 theory.
> >
> > Both of you (Porat & Full-Swine Glazier) are self aggrandizing for good 
> > cause!
> >
> It must make them feel good about themselves.
> Like your gig and gag does to and for yourself.
> Nothing wrong with that... ROTFLMAO...ahaha

=======================
hi Hanson
is that all that you can say about me ...??
Y.Porat
===========================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547238

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
> hanson wrote:
>> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote>> >
>> > 2
"Y.Porat" wrote:
>> > HAD THERE **NOT*BEEN LOCATION OF COMPLETE EMPTINESS
>> > **NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COLD BE DONE !!
>> > that is an historic finding/postulate of mine
>> > ------------
>> >
Harlow Campbvell "HVAC" wrote:
>> > Of course it is! You and your Y. Circle Jerk theory rank right up there
>> > with Bert and his G=EMC^2 theory.
>> > Both of you (Porat & Full-Swine Glazier) are self aggrandizing for good
>> > cause!
>> >
hanson wrote:
>> It must make them feel good about themselves.
>> Like your gig and gag does to & for yourself, Harlow.
>> Nothing wrong with that... ROTFLMAO...ahaha
>
"Y.Porat" wrote:
> hi Hanson
> is that all that you can say about me ...??
> Y.Porat
>
hanson wrote:
I said: "Nothing wrong with that" ... Do you have your
friend's, Full-Swine Glazier's,  need "to be loved by all"?
If you wanna hear more what I said about you, then
check my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
"The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547290

Nothing is nothing.
Space is full of itself

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547320

The Avatar of Vegetania "john" <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nothing is nothing.
> Space is full of itself
>
hanson wrote:
Just like you are, Sefton, n'est pas?
Thanks for the laughs, ROTFLMAO!
ahahahahahanson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547325

:)
What used to be my grandmas farm
on the Red River is now a large part
of Winnipeg, Canada.
She got booted off.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547422

On 01/22/2016 06:18 PM, john wrote:
> :)
> What used to be my grandmas farm
> on the Red River is now a large part
> of Winnipeg, Canada.
> She got booted off.
>
That's odd. My grandma's farm was taken over for a song supposedly to 
make it a state park. Oddly, they never built the park.

HVAC says only KOOKs don't trust everything government says.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547421

On 01/22/2016 03:22 PM, john wrote:
> Nothing is nothing.
> Space is full of itself
>
So is HVAC.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547435

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 8:20:32 PM UTC+2, hanson wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hanson wrote:
> >> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote>> >
> >> > 2
> "Y.Porat" wrote:
> >> > HAD THERE **NOT*BEEN LOCATION OF COMPLETE EMPTINESS
> >> > **NO MOTION WHATSOEVER COLD BE DONE !!
> >> > that is an historic finding/postulate of mine
> >> > ------------
> >> >
> Harlow Campbvell "HVAC" wrote:
> >> > Of course it is! You and your Y. Circle Jerk theory rank right up there
> >> > with Bert and his G=EMC^2 theory.
> >> > Both of you (Porat & Full-Swine Glazier) are self aggrandizing for good
> >> > cause!
> >> >
> hanson wrote:
> >> It must make them feel good about themselves.
=============================
quote 
makes 'them'  who 'them ?feel good 

me and Glazier  about physics ??
is there anything common between me and Glazier ??

---
> >> Like your gig and gag does to & for yourself, Harlow.
?????
--------------
> >> Nothing wrong with that...
---
with what ???? ROTFLMAO...ahaha
Y.P
> >
> "Y.Porat" wrote:
> > hi Hanson
> > is that all that you can say about me ...??
> > Y.Porat
> >
> hanson wrote:
> I said: "Nothing wrong with that" ... Do you have your
> friend's, Full-Swine Glazier's,  need "to be loved by all"?

did i ever combined myself with Glazier ??
do **you** combine us together ??
------
> If you wanna hear more what I said about you, then
> check my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
> "The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
================
to make it shorter and clearer :

do you understand and support/agree with  my 
Y.Circlon mechanism''

BTW
its  long time that i didn t see you on the net
any reason for that ??
2
and a friendly advice 
just do a favor for me and may be for you 

just get of with  your  racist  citing s agenda 
our days -   especially  not in a sci.  ***physics*** n g 
it is not well- commend or appreciated in our
supposed to be - 'modern '' world  '    
TIA
Y.Porat
====================

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547570

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
>  hanson wrote:
>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Porat wrote:
> is there anything common between me and Glazier ??
> me and Glazier  about physics ??
> 
hanson wrote:
Certainly, you 2 have Lots in common.
You both are LOUD Jews. You both have theories. 
Glazier has 11 or 12. Porat has  2 or 3 theories.

Porat AND Glazier, both, get angry and threaten folk 
who laugh at or do not believe and support Porat's or 
Glazier's Theories.... and so: 
]>
Glazier wants to shit into their mouths & piss on their graves.
Porat tells them that they are hired pig thief gangsters who
should go and fuck their curved mothers.
>
Porat wrote:
> did i ever combined myself with Glazier ??
> do **you** combine us together ??
> 
hanson wrote:
If YOU, Porat, wants to combine yourself with Glazier
then that is YOUR business. BUT **I** have never 
combined you 2. ....  *Compared*, Yes. See above. 
>
hanson wrote:
>> If you wanna hear more what I said about you, then
>> check my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
>> "The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
> 
Porat wrote:
> to make it shorter and clearer :
> do you understand and support/agree with  my 
> Y.Circlon mechanism''
>
hanson wrote:
The CERN/Higgs scientists make it MUCH shorter
and MUCH,. MUCH clearer then you do. They  even 
say at what energy level the "Porat" is to be expected.
== The "Porat" is different then you, the person, Porat.==
= like the "Higgs" is different from the person, Peter Higgs =
>
Read again my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
"The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
I gave you a supreme COMPLIMENT, you sad Dreidel!
>
If you don't "get the picture", Porat, then maybe Glazier can 
explain it to you with his "Spin is in theory"... ahahahaha.... 
>
Porat wrote:
> and a friendly advice 
> just do a favor for me and may be for you 
> just get of with  your  racist  citing s agenda 
> our days -   especially  not in a sci.  ***physics*** n g 
> it is not well- commend or appreciated in our
> supposed to be - 'modern '' world  '    
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> 
hanson wrote:
But such "racist  citing s agenda" comes from JEWS!
Why should I not report/cite a "racist  citing s agenda"?
Do NOT give such advice to me. Tell it to Ovadia Yosef,
Rabbi Ovadia Josef, ||OJ:|| who said in his Oct 2010 
sermon, "in this modern world":
>
||OJ:|| "The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews".
||OJ:|| "Gentiles serve a divine purpose:
||OJ:|| They will work, they will plow, they will reap.
||OJ:|| We Jews will sit like an effendi, a noble lord, and eat.
||OJ:|| That is why Gentiles were created."
>
So there you go with your friendly advice, Porat, like
the eminent the eminent Jewish scholar Harold Wallace 
Rosenthal did, who said in his epic ||R:||
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim
>
ROTFLMAO!... ahahahaha... thanks for the laughs, Porat!
ahahahahahaanson 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547577

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 8:04:13 PM UTC+2, hanson wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  hanson wrote:
> >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> Porat wrote:
> > is there anything common between me and Glazier ??
> > me and Glazier  about physics ??
> > 
> hanson wrote:
> Certainly, you 2 have Lots in common.
> You both are LOUD Jews. You both have theories. 
> Glazier has 11 or 12. Porat has  2 or 3 theories.
> 
> Porat AND Glazier, both, get angry and threaten folk 
> who laugh at or do not believe and support Porat's or 
> Glazier's Theories.... and so: 
> ]>
> Glazier wants to shit into their mouths & piss on their graves.
> Porat tells them that they are hired pig thief gangsters who
> should go and fuck their curved mothers.
> >
> Porat wrote:
> > did i ever combined myself with Glazier ??
> > do **you** combine us together ??
> > 
> hanson wrote:
> If YOU, Porat, wants to combine yourself with Glazier
> then that is YOUR business. BUT **I** have never 
> combined you 2. ....  *Compared*, Yes. See above. 
> >
> hanson wrote:
> >> If you wanna hear more what I said about you, then
> >> check my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
> >> "The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
> > 
> Porat wrote:
> > to make it shorter and clearer :
> > do you understand and support/agree with  my 
> > Y.Circlon mechanism''
> >
> hanson wrote:
> The CERN/Higgs scientists make it MUCH shorter
> and MUCH,. MUCH clearer then you do. They  even 
> say at what energy level the "Porat" is to be expected.
> == The "Porat" is different then you, the person, Porat.==
> = like the "Higgs" is different from the person, Peter Higgs =
> >
> Read again my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
> "The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
> I gave you a supreme COMPLIMENT, you sad Dreidel!
> >
> If you don't "get the picture", Porat, then maybe Glazier can 
> explain it to you with his "Spin is in theory"... ahahahaha.... 
> >
> Porat wrote:
> > and a friendly advice 
> > just do a favor for me and may be for you 
> > just get of with  your  racist  citing s agenda 
> > our days -   especially  not in a sci.  ***physics*** n g 
> > it is not well- commend or appreciated in our
> > supposed to be - 'modern '' world  '    
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > 
> hanson wrote:
> But such "racist  citing s agenda" comes from JEWS!
> Why should I not report/cite a "racist  citing s agenda"?
> Do NOT give such advice to me. Tell it to Ovadia Yosef,
> Rabbi Ovadia Josef, ||OJ:|| who said in his Oct 2010 
> sermon, "in this modern world":
> >
> ||OJ:|| "The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews".
> ||OJ:|| "Gentiles serve a divine purpose:
> ||OJ:|| They will work, they will plow, they will reap.
> ||OJ:|| We Jews will sit like an effendi, a noble lord, and eat.
> ||OJ:|| That is why Gentiles were created."
> >
> So there you go with your friendly advice, Porat, like
> the eminent the eminent Jewish scholar Harold Wallace 
> Rosenthal did, who said in his epic ||R:||
> <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
> >
> ||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
> ||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
> ||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
> ||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
> ||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim
> >
> ROTFLMAO!... ahahahaha... thanks for the laughs, Porat!
> ahahahahahaanson 
> >
==========================
Hanson
is it possible that you come to sci physics 
with two  identities ??

Y.P
========================================= 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547659

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote
> hanson wrote:
> >
>> Porat wrote:
>> > is there anything common between me and Glazier ??
>> > me and Glazier  about physics ??
>> > 
>> hanson wrote:
>> Certainly, you 2 have Lots in common.
>> You both are LOUD Jews. You both have theories. 
>> Glazier has 11 or 12. Porat has  2 or 3 theories.
>> 
>> Porat AND Glazier, both, get angry and threaten folk 
>> who laugh at or do not believe and support Porat's or 
>> Glazier's Theories.... and so: 
>> ]>
>> Glazier wants to shit into their mouths & piss on their graves.
>> Porat tells them that they are hired pig thief gangsters who
>> should go and fuck their curved mothers.
>> >
>> Porat wrote:
>> > did i ever combined myself with Glazier ??
>> > do **you** combine us together ??
>> > 
>> hanson wrote:
>> If YOU, Porat, wants to combine yourself with Glazier
>> then that is YOUR business. BUT **I** have never 
>> combined you 2. ....  *Compared*, Yes. See above. 
>> >
>> hanson wrote:
>> >> If you wanna hear more what I said about you, then
>> >> check my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
>> >> "The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
>> > 
>> Porat wrote:
>> > to make it shorter and clearer :
>> > do you understand and support/agree with  my 
>> > Y.Circlon mechanism''
>> >
>> hanson wrote:
>> The CERN/Higgs scientists make it MUCH shorter
>> and MUCH,. MUCH clearer then you do. They  even 
>> say at what energy level the "Porat" is to be expected.
>> == The "Porat" is different then you, the person, Porat.==
>> = like the "Higgs" is different from the person, Peter Higgs =
>> >
>> Read again my post from Sat, Jan 16, 2016 3:30 PM
>> "The Higgs.... and onwards to Porat's Circulon"
>> I gave you a supreme COMPLIMENT, you sad Dreidel!
>> >
>> If you don't "get the picture", Porat, then maybe Glazier can 
>> explain it to you with his "Spin is in theory"... ahahahaha.... 
>> >
>> Porat wrote:
>> > and a friendly advice 
>> > just do a favor for me and may be for you 
>> > just get of with  your  racist  citing s agenda 
>> > our days -   especially  not in a sci.  ***physics*** n g 
>> > it is not well- commend or appreciated in our
>> > supposed to be - 'modern '' world  '    
>> > TIA
>> > Y.Porat
>> > 
>> hanson wrote:
>> But such "racist  citing s agenda" comes from JEWS!
>> Why should I not report/cite a "racist  citing s agenda"?
>> Do NOT give such advice to me. Tell it to Ovadia Yosef,
>> Rabbi Ovadia Josef, ||OJ:|| who said in his Oct 2010 
>> sermon, "in this modern world":
>> >
>> ||OJ:|| "The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews".
>> ||OJ:|| "Gentiles serve a divine purpose:
>> ||OJ:|| They will work, they will plow, they will reap.
>> ||OJ:|| We Jews will sit like an effendi, a noble lord, and eat.
>> ||OJ:|| That is why Gentiles were created."
>> >
>> So there you go with your friendly advice, Porat, like
>> the eminent the eminent Jewish scholar Harold Wallace 
>> Rosenthal did, who said in his epic ||R:||
>> <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>> >
>> ||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
>> ||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
>> ||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
>> ||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
>> ||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim
>> >
>> ROTFLMAO!... ahahahaha... thanks for the laughs, Porat!
>> ahahahahahanson 
>> >
> Porat wrote:
> Hanson, is it possible that you come to sci physics 
> with two  identities ??
> 
hanson wrote:
"two"?... hanson@quick.net is an open/joint corporate
account that is used by the interns, recruits and most
job-applicants here.
>
This has been explained here many times before. 
Repetitive answers are usually posted by job applicants 
who are encouraged to post, while they wait for their 
interview. They hope to "prove" by their post that they 
are good team players... "Get the picture"
>
AFAIK though, posts between Porat and hanson have 
always been on a personal 1:1 relation ship. It is funny 
though to see Porat's backstroking when Porat's own
past expressions are repeated. .... ahahahahahaha...
>
So, remember now also, Porat, that it was YOU 2 Jews
that posted:
I, <y.y.porat@gmail.com>, am a **Proud Zionist** &
I, <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, am a **Proud Jew**
>
So remember,  you two proudly loud-mouthing Yidds, that 
YOUR antics should allow, "different strokes from different
folks", ... but if you don't want to have that, then neither 
of you two will ever be "loved by all", a state which both 
of you so badly crave & yearn for.    Pity, but IROTFLMAO.
>
The only religious fanatics (or "racists" as you call them)
who are worse then you 2, are the brainwashed GOYIM
who come by and defend you 2 "racists". ... ROTFLMAO!
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547721

On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 12:49:01  > of you so badly crave & yearn for.    Pity, but IROTFLMAO.
> >
> The only religious fanatics (or "racists" as you call them)
> who are worse then you 2, are the brainwashed GOYIM
> who come by and defend you 2 "racists". ... ROTFLMAO!
----------------------------
HANSON
HOW OLD ARE YOU ??

TIA
Y.Porat
===================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web