Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #544496 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-11 10:41 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-01-13 10:16 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 108 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 10:41 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 12:55 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 11:16 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 13:43 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:04 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-11 16:29 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:54 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 02:48 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 06:06 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:12 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:16 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 23:27 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 10:20 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 10:25 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 10:30 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 05:58 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-12 16:14 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:36 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-11 19:27 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:21 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:22 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:41 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 17:11 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 19:55 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 13:42 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-11 22:22 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-11 16:34 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:57 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 20:45 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 20:34 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 22:01 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:59 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:26 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:11 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:58 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:07 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 00:22 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 08:01 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:51 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-12 00:32 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 18:00 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-12 02:16 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 19:12 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 19:34 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-12 06:19 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 23:10 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-12 18:35 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:05 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-12 03:39 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 23:06 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 23:28 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-12 14:33 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 22:17 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-12 03:41 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 17:07 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 19:47 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 21:53 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:57 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:21 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:05 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 12:12 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:32 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 18:04 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:09 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 00:24 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 08:03 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:55 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:04 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 00:21 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 20:16 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:33 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 21:02 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:37 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-12 16:04 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 16:17 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:43 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:48 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 17:51 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 14:19 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 18:13 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 20:37 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-11 19:27 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:33 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:54 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:35 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-12 13:40 +1100
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 22:08 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-12 03:13 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 20:56 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-12 22:21 +1100
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:34 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-11 22:00 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-01-12 13:40 +0000
Re: Newsgroup censorship Catherine Jefferson <spamtrap@spambouncer.org> - 2016-01-12 08:42 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:04 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:13 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:26 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:09 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 12:27 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:38 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 12:54 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 18:00 -0500
Re: Newsgroup censorship Rock Brentwood <federation2005@netzero.com> - 2016-01-12 17:28 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 20:23 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:54 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 09:58 -0800
Re: Newsgroup censorship Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 12:13 -0600
Re: Newsgroup censorship HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 10:16 -0800
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 10:41 -0800 |
| Subject | Newsgroup censorship |
| Message-ID | <7b40664d-02ab-417e-8016-c8bf51432315@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroup censorship All persons in the democracies of the West have the fundamental right to have access to all expressions of knowledge, creativity and intellectual activity, and to express their thoughts publicly. Newsgroups have a basic responsibility for the development and maintenance of intellectual freedom and the responsibility to guarantee and facilitate access to all expressions of knowledge and intellectual activity, including those which some some elements of society may consider to be unconventional, unpopular or unacceptable. Newsgroups should resist all efforts to limit the exercise of these responsibilities while recognizing the right of criticism by individuals and groups. I have been denied these rights by the newsgroup sci.physics.research for trying to post four articles. The first (The value of G) made it but was killed after the first reply because my arguments "were circular". The other three were rejected outright. The excuse for the second (The mass of the Sun) was "I had already been told to cease posting after my first thread The value of G". The third post (The aether, Michelson and Einstein) was rejected for being "too speculative". The fourth post (The aether and Einstein) was rejected because "I used Einstein to support my arguments". It was also stated that a post rejected by a moderated newsgroup would also be rejected by other newsgroups. In an unmoderated newsgroup, censorship is applied by abuse, being called a crank or coordinated silence. Moderated newsgroups like to give reasons for rejections but they do not hesitate to resort to hypocrisy, double standards and the absurd. Replies to their judgments are forbidden and appeals, the foundation of a fair justice system, are absent. Peter Riedt
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 12:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <EsGdnSqbcokwZw7LnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #544496 |
On 1/11/16 12:41 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > I have been denied these rights by the newsgroup sci.physics.research for trying to post four articles. Moderators in sci.physics.research have the responsibility to weed out posts where the content is contradicted by physics observations. You can post in unmoderated groups, such as sci.physics, which is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 11:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9ad8bedf-5466-4153-8ea8-fdd2bbf891f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544500 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:55:46 AM UTC+8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 1/11/16 12:41 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > > I have been denied these rights by the newsgroup sci.physics.research for trying to post four articles. > > > Moderators in sci.physics.research have the responsibility to weed > out posts where the content is contradicted by physics observations. > You can post in unmoderated groups, such as sci.physics, which is > an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, > news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues. Much of the discussions in spr have content contradicted by preferred physics observations. Double standards are applied to control deviations from dogma like the church did to the scientists in the 17th century.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 13:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <EsGdnSabcoltmAnLnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #544506 |
On 1/11/16 1:16 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > Much of the discussions in spr have content contradicted by > preferred physics observations. Double standards are applied to > control deviations from dogma like the church did to the scientists > in the 17th century. > Perhaps I should have said -- Moderators in sci.physics.research have the responsibility to weed out posts that are inappropriate to the newsgroup. Of course everybody has different opinions as to what is appropriate. For example the jimp thinks most of my posting are inappropriate, but on the other hand, I get a lot of thanks from others. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 17:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sFVky.121020$L45.9520@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #544519 |
On 01/11/2016 02:43 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 1/11/16 1:16 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>> Much of the discussions in spr have content contradicted by
>> preferred physics observations. Double standards are applied to
>> control deviations from dogma like the church did to the scientists
>> in the 17th century.
>>
>
>
> Perhaps I should have said -- Moderators in sci.physics.research have
> the responsibility to weed out posts that are inappropriate to the
> newsgroup.
>
> Of course everybody has different opinions as to what is appropriate.
> For example the jimp thinks most of my posting are inappropriate, but
> on the other hand, I get a lot of thanks from others.
Only proves the old saying: Nobody ever went broke underestimating the
intelligence of the American public.
You are just lucky that OUR "moderator" HVAC, allows you to post your
political trash. If he knew any science at all you'd be banned for life
as a crank.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 16:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n71ada$ne9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #544500 |
On 1/11/2016 12:55 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 1/11/16 12:41 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>> I have been denied these rights by the newsgroup sci.physics.research
>> for trying to post four articles.
>
>
> Moderators in sci.physics.research have the responsibility to weed
> out posts where the content is contradicted by physics observations.
> You can post in unmoderated groups, such as sci.physics, which is
> an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics,
> news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
>
>
>
sci.physics is NOT the place for "social issues"
please post them in;
alt.social.issues.for.non.scientists.types
this group will not be hijacked into "socialist issues"
and barrel boats are just fine,
that is buoyancy in water which is totally physics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 15:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0b530fa2-03f5-48f2-a4eb-390515464668@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544574 |
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 2:30:08 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > On 1/11/2016 12:55 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 1/11/16 12:41 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > >> I have been denied these rights by the newsgroup sci.physics.research > >> for trying to post four articles. > > > > > > Moderators in sci.physics.research have the responsibility to weed > > out posts where the content is contradicted by physics observations. > > You can post in unmoderated groups, such as sci.physics, which is > > an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, > > news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues. > > > > > > > > sci.physics is NOT the place for "social issues" > > > please post them in; > > alt.social.issues.for.non.scientists.types > > > this group will not be hijacked into "socialist issues" > > > > > > > > > > and barrel boats are just fine, > that is buoyancy in water which is totally physics Built my first barrel boat in Fl.to go over the Falls That took good science.That was 16 years ago.Last one built in early 2015 to sail to Hawaii.Now my boats are to be used to save lives in flash floods. Its nice to stay alive and do good.Hate mongers should try it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 02:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9ca9123d-d3a7-4d73-9c88-774aba5004e4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544604 |
Built my first barrel boat in Fl.to go over the Falls That took good science.That was 16 years ago.Last one built in early 2015 to sail to Hawaii. -------------- Bert's Hawaii boat does not exist. That's why he will only post pictures of his stupid table cloth boat from years ago. There is no boat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 06:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c2127a04-4633-47e9-b638-7218b2aa29ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544726 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 12:48:36 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote: > Built my first barrel boat in Fl.to go over the Falls That took good science.That was 16 years ago.Last one built in early 2015 to sail to Hawaii. > -------------- > > Bert's Hawaii boat does not exist. > > That's why he will only post pictures of his stupid table cloth boat from years ago. > > There is no boat ======================== Hi anonymous pig criminal HAVAC what is your real F name hey coward ! you delude yourself that pope here will not find quickly that you are a psych criminal parasite ------ Y.P =======================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 07:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <00476af1-0628-4b78-b403-0f922bf4d024@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544750 |
Hi anonymous pig criminal HAVAC what is your real F name hey coward ! you delude yourself that pope here will not find quickly that you are a psych criminal parasite ------ Y.P ================================== I was intentionally staying out of this discussion and now i see that Y.Circle Jerk is bringing me up. All I can say is that obviously not many people realize that *I* am the moderator of sci.physics. Mostly because I maintain a low profile and rarely moderate posts. Only those that directly threaten another are typically subject to my oversight. Other than that I don't actually give a flying fandango fuck. H.V.A.C. Moderator Emeritus sci.physics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 14:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wicly.179589$rj1.97089@fx27.iad> |
| In reply to | #544761 |
On 01/12/2016 10:12 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Hi anonymous pig criminal HAVAC
> what is your real F name
> hey coward !
> you delude yourself that pope here
> will not find quickly
> that you are a psych criminal parasite
> ------
> Y.P
> ==================================
>
>
> I was intentionally staying out of this discussion and now i see that Y.Circle Jerk is bringing me up.
>
> All I can say is that obviously not many people realize that *I* am the moderator of sci.physics. Mostly because I maintain a low profile and rarely moderate posts. Only those that directly threaten another are typically subject to my oversight. Other than that I don't actually give a flying fandango fuck.
>
> H.V.A.C.
> Moderator Emeritus
> sci.physics
>
HVAC your drool cup is full!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 23:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8bb401de-6cea-49f3-b445-2e9b0e522486@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544761 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 5:12:20 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote: > Hi anonymous pig criminal HAVAC > what is your real F name > hey coward ! > you delude yourself that pope here > will not find quickly > that you are a psych criminal parasite > ------ > Y.P > ================================== > > > I was intentionally staying out of this discussion and now i see that Y.Circle Jerk is bringing me up. > > All I can say is that obviously not many people realize that *I* am the moderator of sci.physics. Mostly because I maintain a low profile and rarely moderate posts. Only those that directly threaten another are typically subject to my oversight. Other than that I don't actually give a flying fandango fuck. > > H.V.A.C. > Moderator Emeritus > sci.physics ========================= ???? moderator or not moderator ?? Y.P ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 10:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <221fc89f-e277-4aed-a5d7-e7a6bcfcbd01@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544761 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 7:12:20 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: All I can say is that obviously not many people realize that *I* am the moderator of sci.physics. LOL. Did I not call it. So you're the head troll. The troll of trolls.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 10:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cd4b1177-16ce-4666-a5c2-05d9bf3213b0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #545394 |
Exactly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-14 10:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <895d36a1-e23d-4c1f-8284-1ff571ac1b50@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #545399 |
On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 10:25:45 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: > Exactly Like being the hall monitor in elementary school.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 05:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <07733dfb-091c-47a1-bdce-e4c7bcc323e7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544500 |
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 8:55:46 PM UTC+2, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 1/11/16 12:41 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > > I have been denied these rights by the newsgroup sci.physics.research for trying to post four articles. > > > Moderators in sci.physics.research have the responsibility to weed > out posts where the content is contradicted by physics observations. ====================== you can see sci research is is moderated by shameless old farts coks like Philip Helbig will not get far you can see whats going there it looks like a cemetery of copses ================== i have some news for you THE DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM ALONG THE FEW LAST CENTURIES THOUGHT ALL IT S 'DISADVANTAGES ' WON /DEFEATED ALL OTHER SYSTEMS MOREOVER IT IS JUST THE MAIN REASON FOR THE INCREDIBLE ADVANCE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN EURO P AGAINST AL OTHER SYSTEMS I SAY ASIA AFRICA you nameit --------------- it was i think French Decart (spelling ?) who said === I DON T AGREE WITH A SINGLE WORD YOU SAID --YET I AM READY TO BE KILLED FOR YOUR RIGHT -TO SAY IT' hi Helbi (those people think that they can make any private motivated! crime and not somehow be punished for that ----- where are you old retard criminal shameless fart ?? are you by any chance a French man ?? --i am sure not !! Y .Porat ==========================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 16:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n738ov$qcr$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #544748 |
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> writes: >====================== >you can see >sci research is is moderated by shameless old farts coks like >Philip Helbig >will not get far >you can see whats going there >it looks like a cemetery of copses >================== Porat, did you see the charter of sci.physics.research? Specifically, the last line? From the charter: |NEWSGROUP NAME: sci.physics.research. |This newsgroup is to be "lightly" moderated--that is, the moderators |will only reject clearly inappropriate postings, and will accept any |that has serious physics content or that is likely to be of interest |to an audience of professional physicists. Clearly inappropriate |postings include: | | (1) Personal attacks; | (2) Discussion that isn't about or related to physics; | (3) Multiple responses that all say the same things; and | (4) Crackpot postings that are "not even wrong." | |Note also that this newsgroup is not a peer reviewed journal; the |moderators are not referees or editors, and they do not have the time |to check whether the physics (or the grammar!) in each posting is |actually correct. As long as an article is readable, and isn't |blatantly nonsensical, it's fine. "As long as an article is readable". You better work at your spelling and writing if you EVER want to have a post approved there. I'll ignore the "blatantly nonsensical" statement for now...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-13 07:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <23abe821-e253-4016-a977-1fa736ea8552@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #544781 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 6:14:33 PM UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> writes: > > >====================== > >you can see > >sci research is is moderated by shameless old farts coks like > >Philip Helbig > >will not get far > >you can see whats going there > >it looks like a cemetery of copses > >================== > > Porat, did you see the charter of sci.physics.research? Specifically, the > last line? > > From the charter: > > |NEWSGROUP NAME: sci.physics.research. > > |This newsgroup is to be "lightly" moderated--that is, the moderators > |will only reject clearly inappropriate postings, and will accept any > |that has serious physics content or that is likely to be of interest > |to an audience of professional physicists. Clearly inappropriate > |postings include: > | > | (1) Personal attacks; > | (2) Discussion that isn't about or related to physics; > | (3) Multiple responses that all say the same things; and > | (4) Crackpot postings that are "not even wrong." > | > |Note also that this newsgroup is not a peer reviewed journal; the > |moderators are not referees or editors, and they do not have the time > |to check whether the physics (or the grammar!) in each posting is > |actually correct. As long as an article is readable, and isn't > |blatantly nonsensical, it's fine. > > "As long as an article is readable". You better work at your spelling and > writing if you EVER want to have a post approved there. I'll ignore the > "blatantly nonsensical" statement for now... =======================ok let them cook themselves i their own juice they will not go far they are a dead cemetery n g others will do better even this n g is vivid and doing much better and **will go **much further i hope yousaw my note that historically Europe went much further from any point of vew than all the dictatorship systems see the thread 'does light move in a straight line' that i started there and was 'immigrated ' here and you will see which which /where it will go further and more vivid ATB Y.Porat ========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d9cdmc-nee.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #544496 |
Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Newsgroup censorship > > All persons in the democracies of the West have the fundamental right to have access to all expressions of knowledge, creativity and intellectual activity, and to express their thoughts publicly. > No they don't; they have the fundamental right to be free of censorship by the GOVERNMENT. This means you can stand on a soap box in the public park and spew to you hearts content, but no non-governmental entity has to pay any attention to you at all. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 15:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n716cg$ga2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #544496 |
On 1/11/2016 12:41 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > Newsgroup censorship > > All persons in the democracies of the West have the fundamental right to have access > to all expressions of knowledge, creativity and intellectual activity, and to express > their thoughts publicly. No, Peter, you do not. In the capitalist democracies of the West: - People may be required to pay for access to some expressions of knowledge, creativity and intellectual activity. - Many expressions of knowledge, creativity and intellectual activity are explicitly controlled editorially, which means that submissions by contributors can be accepted, rejected, or modified at the negotiation between contributor and editor. This applies to the letters-to-the-editor section of the newspaper, to book publishers, to magazine publishers, to news organizations, to television channels, to moderated online message boards. - You may not have air time to express your views in restaurants, libraries, city streets, concert halls, shops, movie theaters, or police stations, unless you've been given prior permission to do so. You do have the right to express yourself, though not necessarily to the audience you desire and not necessarily for free. You always have the option of creating a web page or a blog site for no cost to you, but you will have to create your own audience for it. You do not have the right to have access to any channel's audience you desire. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web