Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #542776 > unrolled thread

The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-02 08:28 -0600
    Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-02 11:21 -0500
      Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:47 -0600
      Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-03 08:49 -0600
        Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-03 13:26 -0500
        Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-03 20:25 +0000
          Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-03 14:42 -0600
            Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 15:28 -0600
            Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-03 22:18 +0000
              Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-04 21:21 +0000
                Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-05 20:08 +0000
            Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-03 22:44 +0000
              Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 12:55 +0000
                Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 03:57 -0600
                  Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-05 16:33 +0000
                    Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 04:20 -0600
          Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 15:27 -0600
        Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 15:27 -0600
    Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:47 -0600
    Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack The Baker Maker <BakerMaker@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 14:49 -0500
    Re: The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack Baker Maker <BakerMaker@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 15:20 -0500

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#542776 — The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack

The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/ 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#542789

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:28:26 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/ 

When you look at this cite you see mental illness in full bloom.  A
little less than a quarter of the page down is a photo 
labeled: "Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia … Convential truck bombs cannot
make a crater like this. Only one type of explosive can. Take a
guess."
 

B-52 carpet bombing craters. 
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&view=detailv2&qpvt=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&id=7B131055D5F21B3F312197FE2331D26580428D71&selectedIndex=10&ccid=2p%2f%2byYR7&simid=607999101723086258&thid=OIP.Mda9ffec9847b75f980dca0385771010ao0&ajaxhist=0

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&FORM=IGRE

Jim W. Dean is even nuttier than you, Roger.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542823

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:21:57 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:28:26 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/ 
>
>When you look at this cite you see mental illness in full bloom.  A
>little less than a quarter of the page down is a photo 
>labeled: "Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia … Convential truck bombs cannot
>make a crater like this. Only one type of explosive can. Take a
>guess."
> 

     I'll guess a standard bomb could easily do it.

>
>B-52 carpet bombing craters. 
>http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&view=detailv2&qpvt=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&id=7B131055D5F21B3F312197FE2331D26580428D71&selectedIndex=10&ccid=2p%2f%2byYR7&simid=607999101723086258&thid=OIP.Mda9ffec9847b75f980dca0385771010ao0&ajaxhist=0
>
>http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&FORM=IGRE
>

     Looks like Mr. Dean has been proved wrong. It will be interesting
to see how Run Away Roger lives up to his name.

>Jim W. Dean is even nuttier than you, Roger.  
>

     But I'm told he makes some very good sausage. :)

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542916

"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:q2uf8btbpcg34gv9e6r57nikbgajo8ae4i@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:28:26 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/
>
> When you look at this cite you see mental illness in full bloom.  A
> little less than a quarter of the page down is a photo
> labeled: "Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia . Convential truck bombs cannot
> make a crater like this. Only one type of explosive can. Take a
> guess."
>
>
> B-52 carpet bombing craters.
> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&view=detailv2&qpvt=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&id=7B131055D5F21B3F312197FE2331D26580428D71&selectedIndex=10&ccid=2p%2f%2byYR7&simid=607999101723086258&thid=OIP.Mda9ffec9847b75f980dca0385771010ao0&ajaxhist=0
>
> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&FORM=IGRE
>
> Jim W. Dean is even nuttier than you, Roger.

I hope you realize that truck bombs are not the same bombs dropped by B52s 
because it doesn't look like that.

Here is another way to look at it.  Throw a bunch of gas on leaves and then 
light it.  The gasoline doesn't make a hole in the ground because it can't. 
DUH

And do not forget this part of the above site:

Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified 
report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed by 
a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.

This testing has been done for decades after big explosion events by most of 
the major country Intel agencies as most of them have been mini-nuke terror 
attacks.

What makes our material so incredible is the IAEA investigators confirmed 
the nuclear bombing history and our own Sandia labs had designed the bombs 
that were supposed to be used to defend us. They are very angry people.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542942

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:49:13 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:q2uf8btbpcg34gv9e6r57nikbgajo8ae4i@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:28:26 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/
>>
>> When you look at this cite you see mental illness in full bloom.  A
>> little less than a quarter of the page down is a photo
>> labeled: "Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia . Convential truck bombs cannot
>> make a crater like this. Only one type of explosive can. Take a
>> guess."
>>
>>
>> B-52 carpet bombing craters.
>> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&view=detailv2&qpvt=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&id=7B131055D5F21B3F312197FE2331D26580428D71&selectedIndex=10&ccid=2p%2f%2byYR7&simid=607999101723086258&thid=OIP.Mda9ffec9847b75f980dca0385771010ao0&ajaxhist=0
>>
>> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&FORM=IGRE
>>
>> Jim W. Dean is even nuttier than you, Roger.
>
>I hope you realize that truck bombs are not the same bombs dropped by B52s 
>because it doesn't look like that.

Your comment doesn't change the fact that the crater from your
supposed truck bomb looks exactly like the craters made by B-52
bombing.  


>Here is another way to look at it.  

There is no other way to look at it.   I provided an answer to you and
Jim W. Dean and I cited photographic evidence to back up my answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542963

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified 
>report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed by 
>a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.

Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry 
analysis of the dust samples".

No, you won't.  You will run away, as usual for you, Run Away Rocky.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542965

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n6c03e$21o$3@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified
>>report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed 
>>by
>>a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>
> Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry
> analysis of the dust samples".

I have already done that but you have a crazy phoba with youtube videos and 
websites.

But for those that don't have a phobia with websites here are a few sites 
and I'm sure at least one of them list how the "mass spectrometry" proved 
nukes were used after the CGIs were used.

9/11 WTC Nuclear Demolition - North Tower PULVERIZED
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgtN3A3UNY

Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting
 https://donaldfox.wordpress.com

Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11
><http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911><

9-11 Was a Nuclear Attack
><http://www.mwcnews.net/focus/politics/41703-9-11.html><

The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
><http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack><

Nuclear 9/11 Revealed
><http://geopolitics.co/vital-issues/nuclear-911-revealed><

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542970

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 14:42:38 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n6c03e$21o$3@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified
>>>report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed 
>>>by a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>>
>> Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry
>> analysis of the dust samples".
>
>I have already done that but you have a crazy phoba with youtube videos and 
>websites.
>

     No, you have not.

>But for those that don't have a phobia with websites here are a few sites 
>and I'm sure at least one of them list how the "mass spectrometry" proved 
>nukes were used after the CGIs were used.
>
>9/11 WTC Nuclear Demolition - North Tower PULVERIZED
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgtN3A3UNY
>

     Nothing about a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples
found in the k00k video.

>Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting
> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com
>
>Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11
>><http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911><
>
>9-11 Was a Nuclear Attack
>><http://www.mwcnews.net/focus/politics/41703-9-11.html><
>
>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>><http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack><
>
>Nuclear 9/11 Revealed
>><http://geopolitics.co/vital-issues/nuclear-911-revealed><
>

     Nothing about a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples
found within the links.
     Way to live up to your name of Run Away Roger via the use of
avoidance. Keep it up. You must since your mind is unable to accept
the truth.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542976

On 03/01/2016 20:42, Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:n6c03e$21o$3@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>> Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified
>>> report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed
>>> by
>>> a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>>
>> Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry
>> analysis of the dust samples".
>
> I have already done that but you have a crazy phoba with youtube videos and
> websites.
>
> But for those that don't have a phobia with websites here are a few sites
> and I'm sure at least one of them list how the "mass spectrometry" proved
> nukes were used after the CGIs were used.

If you are 'sure' then you will be able to give the quote on the website 
or the timestamp of the youtube video.

>
> 9/11 WTC Nuclear Demolition - North Tower PULVERIZED
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgtN3A3UNY
>
> Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting
>   https://donaldfox.wordpress.com
>
> Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11
>> <http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911><
>
> 9-11 Was a Nuclear Attack
>> <http://www.mwcnews.net/focus/politics/41703-9-11.html><
>
> The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>> <http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack><
>
> Nuclear 9/11 Revealed
>> <http://geopolitics.co/vital-issues/nuclear-911-revealed><
>
> Rocky
>
>

Awaiting one of your usual answers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#543105

On 03/01/2016 22:18, Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 20:42, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6c03e$21o$3@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003
>>>> classified
>>>> report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly
>>>> confirmed
>>>> by
>>>> a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>>>
>>> Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry
>>> analysis of the dust samples".
>>
>> I have already done that but you have a crazy phoba with youtube
>> videos and
>> websites.
>>
>> But for those that don't have a phobia with websites here are a few sites
>> and I'm sure at least one of them list how the "mass spectrometry" proved
>> nukes were used after the CGIs were used.
>
> If you are 'sure' then you will be able to give the quote on the website
> or the timestamp of the youtube video.
>
>>
>> 9/11 WTC Nuclear Demolition - North Tower PULVERIZED
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgtN3A3UNY
>>
>> Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting
>>   https://donaldfox.wordpress.com
>>
>> Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11
>>> <http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911><
>>>
>>
>> 9-11 Was a Nuclear Attack
>>> <http://www.mwcnews.net/focus/politics/41703-9-11.html><
>>
>> The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>>> <http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack><
>>>
>>
>> Nuclear 9/11 Revealed
>>> <http://geopolitics.co/vital-issues/nuclear-911-revealed><
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> Awaiting one of your usual answers.
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>

Still waiting for an answer.

Keep running

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#543318

On 04/01/2016 21:21, Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 22:18, Tony Dragon wrote:
>> On 03/01/2016 20:42, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n6c03e$21o$3@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003
>>>>> classified
>>>>> report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly
>>>>> confirmed
>>>>> by
>>>>> a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>>>>
>>>> Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry
>>>> analysis of the dust samples".
>>>
>>> I have already done that but you have a crazy phoba with youtube
>>> videos and
>>> websites.
>>>
>>> But for those that don't have a phobia with websites here are a few
>>> sites
>>> and I'm sure at least one of them list how the "mass spectrometry"
>>> proved
>>> nukes were used after the CGIs were used.
>>
>> If you are 'sure' then you will be able to give the quote on the website
>> or the timestamp of the youtube video.
>>
>>>
>>> 9/11 WTC Nuclear Demolition - North Tower PULVERIZED
>>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgtN3A3UNY
>>>
>>> Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting
>>>   https://donaldfox.wordpress.com
>>>
>>> Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11
>>>> <http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911><
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 9-11 Was a Nuclear Attack
>>>> <http://www.mwcnews.net/focus/politics/41703-9-11.html><
>>>
>>> The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>>>> <http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack><
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nuclear 9/11 Revealed
>>>> <http://geopolitics.co/vital-issues/nuclear-911-revealed><
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Awaiting one of your usual answers.
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>
> Still waiting for an answer.
>
> Keep running
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>

Looks like Rocky has run away again.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542977

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n6c03e$21o$3@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified
>>>report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed 
>>>by
>>>a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>>
>> Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry
>> analysis of the dust samples".

>I have already done that but you have a crazy phoba with youtube videos and 
>websites.

No you haven't.  You only posted links to k00kvids, and you proved a long
time ago that all k00kvids are fakes, full of lies.

I have no "phobia" with k00kvids.  I just know that since they are all
fakes, full of lies, there's simply no reason to watch them except for
entertainment value.

>But for those that don't have a phobia with websites here are a few sites 
>and I'm sure at least one of them list how the "mass spectrometry" proved 

So you don't even know if those k00kvids even mentions "mass spectrometry"
at all!  (No matter, as we both know that if they do, they're lying about 
it)

So how about actual evidence of "mass spectrometry" being used?  Not a
kookvid, actual evidence.

(watch Rocky run away again)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#543038

moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:

>So how about actual evidence of "mass spectrometry" being used?  Not a
>kookvid, actual evidence.

>(watch Rocky run away again)

Kooktard?  You there?

<crickets chirp>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#543211

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:55:30 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>
>>So how about actual evidence of "mass spectrometry" being used?  Not a
>>kookvid, actual evidence.
>
>>(watch Rocky run away again)
>
>Kooktard?  You there?
>
><crickets chirp>

     There is a reason Rocky is called Run Away Roger.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#543268

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:

>On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:55:30 +0000 (UTC),
>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>>
>>>So how about actual evidence of "mass spectrometry" being used?  Not a
>>>kookvid, actual evidence.
>>
>>>(watch Rocky run away again)
>>
>>Kooktard?  You there?
>>
>><crickets chirp>

>     There is a reason Rocky is called Run Away Roger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAp9sFVdERQ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#543404

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:33:00 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:55:30 +0000 (UTC),
>>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
>>>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>>>
>>>>So how about actual evidence of "mass spectrometry" being used?  Not a
>>>>kookvid, actual evidence.
>>>
>>>>(watch Rocky run away again)
>>>
>>>Kooktard?  You there?
>>>
>>><crickets chirp>
>
>>     There is a reason Rocky is called Run Away Roger.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAp9sFVdERQ

     And Roger will agree that the video proves the claim. After all,
he contends that Youtube videos are 100% true and accurate 100% of the
time.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542969

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:25:18 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified 
>>report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed by 
>>a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>
>Of course you'll provide actual evidence of this "mass spectrometry 
>analysis of the dust samples".
>
>No, you won't.  You will run away, as usual for you, Run Away Rocky.

     To be fair, the web site doesn't offer any actual evidence of
this "mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples".
     This should have been Run Away Roger's first clue that the claim
lacks any merit.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542968

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:49:13 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:q2uf8btbpcg34gv9e6r57nikbgajo8ae4i@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:28:26 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/
>>
>> When you look at this cite you see mental illness in full bloom.  A
>> little less than a quarter of the page down is a photo
>> labeled: "Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia . Convential truck bombs cannot
>> make a crater like this. Only one type of explosive can. Take a
>> guess."
>>
>>
>> B-52 carpet bombing craters.
>> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&view=detailv2&qpvt=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&id=7B131055D5F21B3F312197FE2331D26580428D71&selectedIndex=10&ccid=2p%2f%2byYR7&simid=607999101723086258&thid=OIP.Mda9ffec9847b75f980dca0385771010ao0&ajaxhist=0
>>
>> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=b+52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&qpvt=b52+carpet+bombing+craters&FORM=IGRE
>>
>> Jim W. Dean is even nuttier than you, Roger.
>
>I hope you realize that truck bombs are not the same bombs dropped by B52s 
>because it doesn't look like that.
>

     Both have the point of explosion in the same spot (the ground),
unless the bomb being dropped by a B52 is a "Bunker Buster." Since
none of the images linked to are, I only bring them up to destroy one
of your means of running away.

>Here is another way to look at it.  Throw a bunch of gas on leaves and then 
>light it.  The gasoline doesn't make a hole in the ground because it can't. 
>DUH

     There isn't enough explosive force in open, "breathing" gasoline
to do it.

>
>And do not forget this part of the above site:
>
>Veterans Today has been going public with the official US 2003 classified 
>report on the Ground Zero attack being a nuclear event, quickly confirmed by 
>a mass spectrometry analysis of the dust samples.
>

     But note this analysis is not available for independent review.

>This testing has been done for decades after big explosion events by most of 
>the major country Intel agencies as most of them have been mini-nuke terror 
>attacks.
>
>What makes our material so incredible is the IAEA investigators confirmed 
>the nuclear bombing history and our own Sandia labs had designed the bombs 
>that were supposed to be used to defend us. They are very angry people.

     And you're still wrong, as you've once again proved.
     Now run away from the TRUTH I've posted, Run Away Roger. You have
no choice.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542822

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:28:26 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/ 
>

     And yet, you have never been able to offer any valid, verifiable
evidence of this. A site that hosts items that prove your claims wrong
certainly isn't going to help you.
     The guy who wrote the article linked to above is so far gone he
makes you look almost rational. 


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#542834

Rocky wrote:
> The day the world fell down.9-11 was a nuclear attack
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/
>
>


Noted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web