Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #541509 > unrolled thread

Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-12-25 13:12 -0600
Last post2015-12-27 18:16 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 63 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 13:12 -0600
    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-25 12:18 -0800
      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 15:17 -0600
        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 10:14 -0500
          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 08:20 -0800
            Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 12:17 -0500
              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-26 17:39 +0000
                Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 11:54 -0600
                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 10:34 -0800
                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 20:13 -0500
                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-27 03:01 +0000
                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 03:17 -0500
                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:24 -0600
                            Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 07:49 -0600
                              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 09:39 -0600
                                Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 17:01 +0000
                                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 11:38 -0600
                                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 17:48 +0000
                                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 12:07 -0600
                                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 20:23 +0000
                                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 16:37 -0600
                                            Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 23:23 +0000
                                              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 17:39 -0600
                                                Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-28 00:16 +0000
                                                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 19:02 -0600
                                                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-28 09:41 +0000
                                                Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:58 -0600
                                              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:57 -0600
                                            Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:57 -0600
                                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-12-28 11:07 -0500
                                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:56 -0600
                                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 18:36 -0500
                                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-28 00:18 +0000
                                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-28 07:11 -0600
                                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-28 14:59 +0000
                                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-28 15:33 -0500
                                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 04:58 -0600
                                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:58 -0600
                                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-28 15:34 -0500
                                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-28 22:41 -0500
                                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 04:57 -0600
                                Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-28 01:37 -0600
                                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:58 -0600
                              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 17:01 +0000
                              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:54 -0600
                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-27 18:19 +0000
                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:24 -0600
                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-27 18:22 +0000
                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 08:07 -0600
                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 17:02 +0000
                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-27 03:00 +0000
                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 07:55 -0600
                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:24 -0600
              Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 10:27 -0800
                Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 20:17 -0500
                  Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-27 02:02 -0500
                    Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 03:21 -0500
                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 10:09 -0600
                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-27 18:02 +0000
                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-27 08:34 -0800
                        Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 16:23 -0500
                          Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-27 14:27 -0800
                      Re: Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there. Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-27 18:16 +0000

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →


#542078

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-29 04:57 -0600
Message-ID<6pp48b9t52o522bqaogq6q74nt2qa0mr7e@4ax.com>
In reply to#541994
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:34:10 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

[...]

>>> There you have it folks,....Tony and the rest of the fairytalers are
>>> telling you New Yorkers that you MUST HAVE seen planes or you are
>>> lying.
>>
>>     How long have you held the delusion that Rocky and Tony are the
>> same person? Serious question.
>
>
>
>
>Amun told me. 

     So you told yourself?
     While you may well have done so, this doesn't answer the question
I asked. Will you do so now, or continue to play avoidance games?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541891

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-12-28 01:37 -0600
Message-ID<ctKdndEbN8mFeh3LnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#541787
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:f0l18bplk6c6prmlnt14j2kek3c9prmaa2@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:47:21 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:efl08bd2ar05hq4p7vni4rf4roib8889t3@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:39:44 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 09:39:47 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ro008bl2gh4o3h023bseshvpdc6u8gfrml@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 07:49:25 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:bjiv7bh3heavtubh50kda3nl0acv5nsou8@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Have you heard about 9/11 ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Nearly everyone here has.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You obviously haven't heard or seen very much about it because the
>>>>>>>> jets in Nuke York City were consistent with CGIs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> People on the streets of New York City saw  jets, military and
>>>>>>> civilian that day.   CGI's were not seen by people on the streets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, let me put it this way.  The jets we saw in Nuke York City were
>>>>>> consistent with CGIs.
>>>>>
>>>>> People on the streets in NYC on 9/11/01 saw real planes, Roger.
>>>>> Everyone knows your false CGI claims are rubbish.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You mised my response?,...well here it is again.
>>>
>>> Nope.  People on the streets in NYC on 9/11/01 saw real planes.
>>> Everyone knows your false CGI claims are rubbish.
>>
>>ROTFLMAO because if they saw "real planes"
>
> No "if" , Roger.   They saw real planes.

ROTFLMAO because what we saw was not real because the only way a jet could 
fly into a building without crashing or slowing down is if the Twin Towers 
were made out of a material softer than birds.

And if they were real jets why did they have to cut all the footage short to 
avoid showing the explosives that were needed to make those roadrunner 
cutouts?  <G>

9/11 was a government operation and why should you trust our government to 
be honest when all they want is your money?

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541904

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-28 03:58 -0600
Message-ID<nt128btpi4tld2ilu21kdjs606rdfltm8f@4ax.com>
In reply to#541891
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:37:19 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>>>>You mised my response?,...well here it is again.
>>>>
>>>> Nope.  People on the streets in NYC on 9/11/01 saw real planes.
>>>> Everyone knows your false CGI claims are rubbish.
>>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because if they saw "real planes"
>>
>> No "if" , Roger.   They saw real planes.
>
>ROTFLMAO because what we saw was not real because the only way a jet could 
>fly into a building without crashing or slowing down is if the Twin Towers 
>were made out of a material softer than birds.
>

     Why do you continue to LIE about this? What do you believe you
gain from this?

>And if they were real jets why did they have to cut all the footage short to 
>avoid showing the explosives that were needed to make those roadrunner 
>cutouts?  <G>

     Since no footage was cut short (feel free to prove the original
aired footage was), your lie continues to fail.

>
>9/11 was a government operation and why should you trust our government to 
>be honest when all they want is your money?

     When will you provide valid, verifiable evidence for your claims?
Will you do so now, or continue to earn the name Run Away Roger?
     Time will tell.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541796

FromTony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Date2015-12-27 17:01 +0000
Message-ID<n5p5d6$29v$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#541781
On 27/12/2015 13:49, Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bjiv7bh3heavtubh50kda3nl0acv5nsou8@4ax.com...
> ...
>>> Have you heard about 9/11 ?
>>
>>      Nearly everyone here has.
>
> You obviously haven't heard or seen very much about it because the jets in
> Nuke York City were consistent with CGIs.  But they didn't stop at just one
> CGI as you can tell from looking at the videos they probably used 3
> different CGIs as if there were 3 different groups working on adding the
> CGIs.
>

Rocky bids3 CGI's.

Any increase.

You at the back, do you bid four?

> And don't let the crap flying out the north side of the South Tower fool you
> because they were clearly set up to add one CGI to multiple videos and it
> wouldn't take much more to add multiple CGIs to multiple videos.  DUH.

Could somebody give a logical way in which those watching the buildings 
could see these 'CGI's'?
>
> And you would have to be a total idiot to think normal buildings could fall
> as fast as they did in Nuke York City with only jet fuel.

Hands up those who thought only jet fuel caused the building to fall?
Hands up those who thing the planes hitting the building had something 
to do with it.

>  <G>  And in
> reality those were normal buildings or the first wind storm would have blown
> them over shortly after they were built.
>

Could somebody post a translation of the above sentence?

>
>>> It was an inside job.
>>
>>      Yet after more than 14 years, you can offer nothing to support,
>> let alone prove, this. How very, very odd.
>
> ROTFLMAO because you have had the evidence right in front of your face all
> along.  All you have to do is see that those jets were consistent with CGIs
> and that there has never been and never will be "Global Collapse" without
> the involvement of our own government and new laws right after they nuked
> some buildings.
>
> And do not forget this is not the remains of a "Global Collapse" or the
> dozen or so survivors in WTC1 would have been crushed by falling debris.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541898

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-28 03:54 -0600
Message-ID<7k128b9cvhelfdsuegf4r9k1clhnjtbdf4@4ax.com>
In reply to#541781
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 07:49:25 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:bjiv7bh3heavtubh50kda3nl0acv5nsou8@4ax.com...
>...
>>>Have you heard about 9/11 ?
>>
>>     Nearly everyone here has.
>
>You obviously haven't heard or seen very much about it because the jets in 
>Nuke York City were consistent with CGIs.  

     If that were true, you would have provided the evidence long ago.
All you've done so far live up to your name of Run Away Roger by
ignoring requests for evidence, or playing avoidance games.

>But they didn't stop at just one 
>CGI as you can tell from looking at the videos they probably used 3 
>different CGIs as if there were 3 different groups working on adding the 
>CGIs.

     Every video I've seen shows real planes. The closet I've seen to
a CGI was the one you used to PROVE that ALL 9/11 k00k videos are
lies. And I don't think a CGI plane was used. I think they took images
from earlier in the video and superimposed them.

>
>And don't let the crap flying out the north side of the South Tower fool you 
>because they were clearly set up to add one CGI to multiple videos and it 
>wouldn't take much more to add multiple CGIs to multiple videos.  DUH.
>
>And you would have to be a total idiot to think normal buildings could fall 
>as fast as they did in Nuke York City with only jet fuel.  <G>  And in 

     It's been explained to you more times than I am willing to count,
jet fuel alone did not bring them down. 
     I know you're a very slow learner, but you should have grasp it
by now.

>reality those were normal buildings or the first wind storm would have blown 
>them over shortly after they were built.
>

     They were normal for the size and construction material.

>
>>>It was an inside job.
>>
>>     Yet after more than 14 years, you can offer nothing to support,
>> let alone prove, this. How very, very odd.
>
>ROTFLMAO because you have had the evidence right in front of your face all 
>along.  

     So why has none been presented?

>All you have to do is see that those jets were consistent with CGIs 

     No, they weren't. This was PROVED over a year ago. You, of
course, ran away from the matter.

>and that there has never been and never will be "Global Collapse" without 
>the involvement of our own government and new laws right after they nuked 
>some buildings.
>

     What buildings have been nuked? 
     Include VALID, verifiable evidence.

>And do not forget this is not the remains of a "Global Collapse" or the 
>dozen or so survivors in WTC1 would have been crushed by falling debris.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

     You keep linking to a picture that PROVES your claim wrong. 
     Is your learning disability really so advanced that you are still
UNABLE to learn this? This is a serious question, Run Away Roger.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541810

FromCujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>
Date2015-12-27 18:19 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA57D879009971stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18>
In reply to#541758
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in
news:n5o6lh$t1q$1@dont-email.me: 

> 
> 
> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:n5ndqb$5tc$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hägar wrote:
>>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>>>>
>>>> After removing everything not related to 9/11 there is nothing of
>>>> your post
>>>> left.
>>>>
>>>> That must mean you can't face the truth that CGIs were used and the
>>>> buildings didn't really collapse down because a large portion of
>>>> them ended
>>>> up floating away before they could get to the ground.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** The truth we face is the fact that you and your brethren
>>>> conspiracy
>>>> nuts are all bona-fide KOOKS, that you belong in a mental
>>>> institution, unless you are Democrats, in which case you already
>>>> are in one.
>>>>
>>>> Liberalism is a Mental Disorder that also breeds, among other
>>>> disgusting traits, GLBT afflicted losers and Conspiracy kooks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And again,.....you spread venom, but not even one fact dealing with
>>> the topic.
>>
>> That's so funny coming from you, Roger. You've had 14 years to gather
>> facts and failed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Make up your mind, either I'm Amun or Roger, but I can't be
> both,.....OR CAN I ?

For once, you're right, I had thought I replied to the other TR00F3R AKA 
Wocky. 

> Sorry, but unlike you, I only have one personality living in my head.

You hace a personality? I'll alert the media. 
 
> Have you heard about 9/11 ? It was an inside job. 

Really? After 14 years I still don't see the evidence. Got any?

-- 
Cujo -  The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy 
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse 
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
 "Now go refund every single previous client's money because you
obviously fuck up every time you practice astrology."  Alan Williams  
evaluates Raytard Murphy's skill as an astrologer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541767

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-27 05:24 -0600
Message-ID<uiiv7b1f0am7p5vmcmernphi3r7tfrane7@4ax.com>
In reply to#541734
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 03:01:38 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
<cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:

>"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in
>news:n5ndqb$5tc$1@dont-email.me: 
>
>> Hägar wrote:
>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>> news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>>>
>>> After removing everything not related to 9/11 there is nothing of
>>> your post left.
>>>
>>> That must mean you can't face the truth that CGIs were used and the
>>> buildings didn't really collapse down because a large portion of them
>>> ended up floating away before they could get to the ground.
>>>
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>>
>>> *** The truth we face is the fact that you and your brethren
>>> conspiracy
>>> nuts are all bona-fide KOOKS, that you belong in a mental
>>> institution, unless you are Democrats, in which case you already are
>>> in one. 
>>>
>>> Liberalism is a Mental Disorder that also breeds, among other
>>> disgusting traits, GLBT afflicted losers and Conspiracy kooks.
>> 
>> 
>> And again,.....you spread venom, but not even one fact dealing with
>> the topic.
>
>That's so funny coming from you, Roger. 

     That was Bast, though the confusion is understood. Roger and Bast
feed off each other's delusions.

>You've had 14 years to gather 
>facts and failed. 

     When there are no facts for a position, it's not possible to
gather them. Sadly, this is a truth that neither Bast nor Roger are
able to accept.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541811

FromCujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>
Date2015-12-27 18:22 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA57D88169C0B1stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18>
In reply to#541767
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in
news:uiiv7b1f0am7p5vmcmernphi3r7tfrane7@4ax.com: 

> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 03:01:38 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
> <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> 
>>"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in
>>news:n5ndqb$5tc$1@dont-email.me: 
>>
>>> Hägar wrote:
>>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>>>>
>>>> After removing everything not related to 9/11 there is nothing of
>>>> your post left.
>>>>
>>>> That must mean you can't face the truth that CGIs were used and the
>>>> buildings didn't really collapse down because a large portion of
>>>> them ended up floating away before they could get to the ground.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** The truth we face is the fact that you and your brethren
>>>> conspiracy
>>>> nuts are all bona-fide KOOKS, that you belong in a mental
>>>> institution, unless you are Democrats, in which case you already
>>>> are in one. 
>>>>
>>>> Liberalism is a Mental Disorder that also breeds, among other
>>>> disgusting traits, GLBT afflicted losers and Conspiracy kooks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And again,.....you spread venom, but not even one fact dealing with
>>> the topic.
>>
>>That's so funny coming from you, Roger. 
> 
>      That was Bast, though the confusion is understood. Roger and Bast
> feed off each other's delusions.

Yeah, I already admitted I was wrong about who that was. 

>>You've had 14 years to gather 
>>facts and failed. 
> 
>      When there are no facts for a position, it's not possible to
> gather them. Sadly, this is a truth that neither Bast nor Roger are
> able to accept.

That's why it's entertainment.


-- 
Cujo -  The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy 
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse 
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
 "Christ was just an enlightened person, not unlike me." -Edmo the
 humble 
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541783

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-12-27 08:07 -0600
Message-ID<waOdnTxtEYVvbeLLnZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#541734
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message 
news:XnsA57CE00F16510stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in
> news:n5ndqb$5tc$1@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> Hägar wrote:
>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>> news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>>>
>>> After removing everything not related to 9/11 there is nothing of
>>> your post
>>> left.
>>>
>>> That must mean you can't face the truth that CGIs were used and the
>>> buildings didn't really collapse down because a large portion of them
>>> ended
>>> up floating away before they could get to the ground.
>>>
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *** The truth we face is the fact that you and your brethren
>>> conspiracy
>>> nuts are all bona-fide KOOKS, that you belong in a mental
>>> institution, unless you are Democrats, in which case you already are
>>> in one.
>>>
>>> Liberalism is a Mental Disorder that also breeds, among other
>>> disgusting traits, GLBT afflicted losers and Conspiracy kooks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And again,.....you spread venom, but not even one fact dealing with
>> the topic.
>
> That's so funny coming from you, Roger. You've had 14 years to gather
> facts and failed.

A lot of people figured out 9/11 was a joke on 9/11/01.  The others like you 
can't tell the difference between a cheap CGI or a blurry jet.  And don't 
forget they were using wescam cameras in Nuke York City and if those jet 
were real they would have been in much better quality.  See:

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

Theory of Ghostplane
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc

And a lot of people like you can't tell the difference between a bogus 
"Global Collapse" or a real global collapse even though the remains of the 
Twin Towers look more like they were nuked than collapsed all the way to the 
ground.  And the North Tower certainly did not collapse all the way to the 
ground or it would have crushed the Survivors in floors 2-6 of Staircase B. 
And even the following photos shows 6 floors of Staircase B in WTC1 were 
never crushed during the alleged "global collapse."

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541799

FromTony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Date2015-12-27 17:02 +0000
Message-ID<n5p5dh$29v$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#541783
On 27/12/2015 14:07, Rocky wrote:
> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsA57CE00F16510stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:n5ndqb$5tc$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hägar wrote:
>>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>>>>
>>>> After removing everything not related to 9/11 there is nothing of
>>>> your post
>>>> left.
>>>>
>>>> That must mean you can't face the truth that CGIs were used and the
>>>> buildings didn't really collapse down because a large portion of them
>>>> ended
>>>> up floating away before they could get to the ground.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** The truth we face is the fact that you and your brethren
>>>> conspiracy
>>>> nuts are all bona-fide KOOKS, that you belong in a mental
>>>> institution, unless you are Democrats, in which case you already are
>>>> in one.
>>>>
>>>> Liberalism is a Mental Disorder that also breeds, among other
>>>> disgusting traits, GLBT afflicted losers and Conspiracy kooks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And again,.....you spread venom, but not even one fact dealing with
>>> the topic.
>>
>> That's so funny coming from you, Roger. You've had 14 years to gather
>> facts and failed.
>
> A lot of people figured out 9/11 was a joke on 9/11/01.

Yes, all those people who died are still laughing at the joke, as are 
all their friends & relatives.

>  The others like you
> can't tell the difference between a cheap CGI or a blurry jet.  And don't
> forget they were using wescam cameras in Nuke York City and if those jet
> were real they would have been in much better quality.  See:
>
> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
>   http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
>
> Theory of Ghostplane
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
>
> And a lot of people like you can't tell the difference between a bogus
> "Global Collapse" or a real global collapse even though the remains of the
> Twin Towers look more like they were nuked

There you have it folks, Rocky says the TT's were nuked, all you have to 
do is compare the remains with a nuked building (Rocky will insert the 
link to compare with here ..........}

> than collapsed all the way to the
> ground.  And the North Tower certainly did not collapse all the way to the
> ground or it would have crushed the Survivors in floors 2-6 of Staircase B.
> And even the following photos shows 6 floors of Staircase B in WTC1 were
> never crushed during the alleged "global collapse."
>
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541733

FromCujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>
Date2015-12-27 03:00 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA57CDFCF78FE1stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18>
In reply to#541668
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in
news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com: 

> 
> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message 
> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
> 
> After removing everything 

You misspelled "evading", kook. 

-- 
Cujo -  The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy 
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse 
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
 "Thanks for the vote of confidence, something I have rarely gotten here
in 7 years." - Edmo bemaons what an asshole he is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541782

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-12-27 07:55 -0600
Message-ID<VYSdndwgyq_Tc-LLnZ2dnUU7-YHOydjZ@giganews.com>
In reply to#541733
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message 
news:XnsA57CDFCF78FE1stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in
> news:8dadnUzM8LisSePLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
>>
>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>>
>> After removing everything
>
> You misspelled "evading", kook.

Ok, I'll let you get back on topic which was the gash in the ground at 
Pranksville, PA was there long before they dropped a bomb that left a 
mushroom cloud in Pranksville, PA that was much like the mushroom cloud 
above one of the Twin Towers.

And yes, nukes leave mushroom clouds.  And talking about nukes.  Dig this 
photo which NIST claims was caused by a Global Collapse but they could never 
explain why the Twin Towers came down so fcuking fast and yet couldn't crush 
the Survivors in WTC1 with falling debris.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541766

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-27 05:24 -0600
Message-ID<8iiv7btlh6c884oh9p7ajnksqav6fcvfoq@4ax.com>
In reply to#541668
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:54:25 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message 
>news:XnsA57C80C756791stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18...
>
>After removing everything not related to 9/11 there is nothing of your post 
>left.
>
>That must mean you can't face the truth that CGIs were used and the 
>buildings didn't really collapse down because a large portion of them ended 
>up floating away before they could get to the ground.
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

     Will you provide VALID, verifiable evidence for your claims? Or
will you once again live up to your name of "Run Away Roger?"
     Posting a link to a picture that PROVES your claims wrong isn't
going to work for you.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541673

FromHägar <hsahm@yahoo.com>
Date2015-12-26 10:27 -0800
Message-ID<8qGdnXjUC-e9QePLnZ2dnUVZ5sudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#541661
"Bast"  wrote in message news:n5mhve$rm7$1@dont-email.me...


Hägar wrote:
> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n5manf$vke$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Rocky wrote:
>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:c88f4$567da45a$453ebb0b$13758@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>>
>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>> news:p7GdnZQSL9IFCODLnZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPSd8-P9EnE
>>>
>>> And the other problem is the lying media claims it landed inverted
>>> but
>>> then
>>> where did the mark from the alleged tail go?
>>>
>>> Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive
>>> http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/37081-Tangled-Web
>>>
>>>
>>> *** Of course, Wockie ... it all makes sense now ... the 
>>> terrorists
>>> ...
>>> oops, Bush and Cheney went to PA and dug a hole in the middle
>>> of a field to look like the impact crater of a fully loaded
>>> airliner
>>> ... brilliant !!!
>>> You are, without reservations, one stupid MoFo.
>
>
> Well well,....even someone as dense and gubberment brainwashed like
> hagar,
> is finally starting to get it.
> Although it would have been far easier for them just to target the
> spot with
> a shaped charge explosion, with a bomb simply dropped from a plane.
>
> The hardest part would have been for spin doctors to try selling the
> story
> that the passenger jet completely vaporized on impact or was 
> swallowed
> up
> whole by the earth.
> And we all know that bandanas and passports are indestructable
> Too bad about that tail hole not being there though....but if they
> have
> enough people dumbed down like hagar, they can tell them anything 
> wrap
> it in
> a flag, and the hagars will suck it up without question.
>
>
> *** What I'm finally getting is that you and Wockie are mentally
> unstable.  Your hatred towards GW Bush and Dick Cheney is so
> obvious, that it clouds all the discovery facts of the 9/11 events.
> There is another group with the same fanaticism ... they are
> referred to as ISIS, or ISIL, as the head nigger prefers to call
> them in his on-air bouts of narcissistic ignorance.
> The basic concept is known as brain-washing, and oppressive
> Regimes have used it for centuries to re-educate the rebelling
> populace. However, some human cretins, such as you and
> Wockie, are long beyond reeducation.
>
> But then, that is a common trait among the Liberal Loons.



So we're either with you,...or we are with the terrorists ????
When the US government has killed countless times more people and been
behind the overthow dozens of foreign governments, then every other
"terrorist" group in history ?
As well as killing and disapearing their own citizens, just for 
questioning
big brother.
And you still want me to be on your side ?

Fuck you then,....where do I sign up to join ISIS ?
They at least, give out free cookies at their meetings.



*** And you won't have to worry about getting raped ....
their religious fanaticism forbids them to touch pigs ...
lucky you ... could you take Rosie O'Donnell with you ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541719

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-12-26 20:17 -0500
Message-ID<n5ne30$6m9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#541673

Hägar wrote:
> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n5mhve$rm7$1@dont-email.me...
>
>
> Hägar wrote:
>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n5manf$vke$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c88f4$567da45a$453ebb0b$13758@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>>>
>>>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>>>> news:p7GdnZQSL9IFCODLnZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPSd8-P9EnE
>>>>
>>>> And the other problem is the lying media claims it landed inverted
>>>> but
>>>> then
>>>> where did the mark from the alleged tail go?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive
>>>> http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/37081-Tangled-Web
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** Of course, Wockie ... it all makes sense now ... the
>>>> terrorists
>>>> ...
>>>> oops, Bush and Cheney went to PA and dug a hole in the middle
>>>> of a field to look like the impact crater of a fully loaded
>>>> airliner
>>>> ... brilliant !!!
>>>> You are, without reservations, one stupid MoFo.
>>
>>
>> Well well,....even someone as dense and gubberment brainwashed like
>> hagar,
>> is finally starting to get it.
>> Although it would have been far easier for them just to target the
>> spot with
>> a shaped charge explosion, with a bomb simply dropped from a plane.
>>
>> The hardest part would have been for spin doctors to try selling the
>> story
>> that the passenger jet completely vaporized on impact or was
>> swallowed
>> up
>> whole by the earth.
>> And we all know that bandanas and passports are indestructable
>> Too bad about that tail hole not being there though....but if they
>> have
>> enough people dumbed down like hagar, they can tell them anything
>> wrap
>> it in
>> a flag, and the hagars will suck it up without question.
>>
>>
>> *** What I'm finally getting is that you and Wockie are mentally
>> unstable.  Your hatred towards GW Bush and Dick Cheney is so
>> obvious, that it clouds all the discovery facts of the 9/11 events.
>> There is another group with the same fanaticism ... they are
>> referred to as ISIS, or ISIL, as the head nigger prefers to call
>> them in his on-air bouts of narcissistic ignorance.
>> The basic concept is known as brain-washing, and oppressive
>> Regimes have used it for centuries to re-educate the rebelling
>> populace. However, some human cretins, such as you and
>> Wockie, are long beyond reeducation.
>>
>> But then, that is a common trait among the Liberal Loons.
>
>
>
> So we're either with you,...or we are with the terrorists ????
> When the US government has killed countless times more people and been
> behind the overthow dozens of foreign governments, then every other
> "terrorist" group in history ?
> As well as killing and disapearing their own citizens, just for
> questioning
> big brother.
> And you still want me to be on your side ?
>
> Fuck you then,....where do I sign up to join ISIS ?
> They at least, give out free cookies at their meetings.
>
>
>
> *** And you won't have to worry about getting raped ....
> their religious fanaticism forbids them to touch pigs ...
> lucky you ... could you take Rosie O'Donnell with you ...






You do seem to have a fixation on the fatties don't you ?

You are the only person I know who thinks the movie "delverance" was erotic.
(although I'm sure that others here that you share a brain with, will make 
that list grow quickly) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541754

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-12-27 02:02 -0500
Message-ID<p83v7b9959j7uv0c5dq4f4n66u8f67kmj4@4ax.com>
In reply to#541719
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:17:41 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>> *** And you won't have to worry about getting raped ....
>> their religious fanaticism forbids them to touch pigs ...
>> lucky you ... could you take Rosie O'Donnell with you ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>You do seem to have a fixation on the fatties don't you ?

This is the second time you've admitted to being a fatty, Bast.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541759

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-12-27 03:21 -0500
Message-ID<n5o6ue$tmi$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#541754

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:17:41 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>> *** And you won't have to worry about getting raped ....
>>> their religious fanaticism forbids them to touch pigs ...
>>> lucky you ... could you take Rosie O'Donnell with you ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You do seem to have a fixation on the fatties don't you ?
>
> This is the second time you've admitted to being a fatty, Bast.



I see it's hagars turn to use your brain today. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541788

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-12-27 10:09 -0600
Message-ID<7dadndgCKukRkB3LnZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#541759
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:n5o6ue$tmi$1@dont-email.me...
>
>
> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:17:41 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> *** And you won't have to worry about getting raped ....
>>>> their religious fanaticism forbids them to touch pigs ...
>>>> lucky you ... could you take Rosie O'Donnell with you ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You do seem to have a fixation on the fatties don't you ?
>>
>> This is the second time you've admitted to being a fatty, Bast.
>
>
>
> I see it's hagars turn to use your brain today.

Funny, but SE might also be simply reading too many of Hägar's post and it 
is a simple case of monkey see monkey do.

Case in point SE doesn't care about what she saw of the CGIs in Nuke York 
City she wants to rely on what others said about them instead and that is a 
common mistake of the fooled by 9/11ers.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541806

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-12-27 18:02 +0000
Message-ID<n5p93s$grm$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#541788
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>Case in point SE doesn't care about what she saw of the CGIs in Nuke York 
>City she wants to rely on what others said about them instead and that is a 
>common mistake of the fooled by 9/11ers.

Case in point, "Run Away Rocky" doesn't care what he saw of the planes
crashing in New York City, he wants to rely on what others said about them
instead in the kookvids, and that is a common mistake of the kooktards.

He does this even though he proved that kookvids are just a pack of lies!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#541792

FromHägar <hsahm@yahoo.com>
Date2015-12-27 08:34 -0800
Message-ID<bu-dnSJ_D5W6jh3LnZ2dnUVZ5rGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#541759
"Bast"  wrote in message news:n5o6ue$tmi$1@dont-email.me...

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:17:41 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>> *** And you won't have to worry about getting raped ....
>>> their religious fanaticism forbids them to touch pigs ...
>>> lucky you ... could you take Rosie O'Donnell with you ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You do seem to have a fixation on the fatties don't you ?
>
> This is the second time you've admitted to being a fatty, Bast.



I see it's hagars turn to use your brain today.



*** You drop all the hints, Bastie ... we just put them together
and the picture of an obese, ignorant Lezzbo emerges ... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web