Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #540252 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-19 09:10 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-01-02 19:08 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 63 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 09:10 -0600
Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 07:22 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 09:41 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-19 16:42 +0000
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2015-12-19 16:56 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 21:24 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-20 12:57 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 09:52 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 17:31 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 19:33 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 12:06 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 07:03 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-12-27 04:54 -0500
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 04:54 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:23 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 13:02 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 15:42 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 15:45 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 15:05 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 18:20 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 21:21 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 07:04 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 08:01 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 10:46 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 11:20 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 09:30 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 10:40 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 12:57 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 11:23 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 20:54 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 11:32 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 13:52 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2015-12-29 15:02 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 10:01 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 10:43 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 10:59 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 05:34 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 06:41 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 08:08 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 08:26 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 08:40 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 10:26 -0800
Re: hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 14:16 -0500
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 13:11 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 17:07 -0800
Re: hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 20:48 -0500
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 01:25 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 04:23 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 14:08 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 16:23 -0800
hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 08:50 -0800
Re: hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 13:55 -0500
Re: hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 13:32 -0500
Re: hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 13:30 -0500
Re: hVac is obsessed with Bert, like a fan girl. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 13:28 -0500
Re: hVac promotes Bert at every turn. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 18:52 -0500
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2015-12-30 11:18 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 15:08 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:39 -0800
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 19:04 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 19:05 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 19:07 -0600
Re: Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 19:08 -0600
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 09:10 -0600 |
| Subject | Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research |
| Message-ID | <MZWdnbzFCZrA7ujLnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food crumbles into stars according to research > http://phys.org/news/2015-12-black-holes-large-billion-suns.html > Black holes at the heart of galaxies could swell to 50 billion times > the mass of the sun before losing the discs of gas they rely on to > sustain themselves, according to research at the University of > Leicester. > > In a study titled 'How Big Can a Black Hole Grow?', Professor Andrew > King from the University of Leicester's Department of Physics and > Astronomy explores supermassive black holes at the centre of > galaxies, around which are regions of space where gas settles into an > orbiting disc. > > This gas can lose energy and fall inwards, feeding the black hole. > But these discs are known to be unstable and prone to crumbling into > stars. > > Professor King calculated how big a black hole would have to be for > its outer edge to keep a disc from forming, coming up with the figure > of 50 billion solar masses. > From the physics perspective, the only limit to black hole growth is the availability of something to fall in. After that is is the VERY SLOW evaporation (~10^80 years) until they are all gone. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 07:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a2d25b99-557c-421a-bf07-bbac94755486@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540252 |
Absolute and total hogwash. "Crumble into stars". Pffft!! BHs don't come from gravitational collapse. Modern Physics has NO IDEA how Gravity works!! They still think they will a. find Gravity waves b find gravitons c someday find their asses if they can get their right and left hands cooperating
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 09:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MZWdnbfFCZo05-jLnZ2dnUU7-eMAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #540255 |
On 12/19/15 9:22 AM, john wrote:
> BHs don't come from gravitational collapse.
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 16:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n541e9$ggh$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #540255 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Absolute and total hogwash. >"Crumble into stars". Pffft!! You may think it's stupid, yet you believe in much stupider crap such as LeSage gravity, fractal universes and spinny things being the answer to everything short of World Peace. Why????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 16:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8349fdea-c83a-434a-9aff-55cdcd043bcd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540252 |
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 10:10:24 UTC-5, Sam Wormley wrote: > > Black holes at the heart of galaxies could swell to 50 billion times > > the mass of the sun before losing the discs of gas they rely on to > > sustain themselves, according to research at the University of > > Leicester. > > > it is beautiful how nature shows simplicity of structure and functionality in every process with striking similarities how MatterEnergy and information can travel through black holes through spacetime to form and/or feed quasars and galaxies like the umbilical cord of a mother to her child. from the stem of a mushroom, or the eye of a tornado or a hurricane, or the black center of an eye itself the elegance is seen all over the place with things that most people will take for granted this are no coincidences. they represent proof of a common design through out the universe and if we learn to understand it and use it it will help us improve our own way of life with a brighter consciousness a better future. the awakening is truly really near (and that is also not a coincidence) the time when all fields of science will add up to the quest to the ultimate answer to everything r.y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 21:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <129abd9f-3f1b-4ea2-be59-ae1de06d0f1c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540360 |
Pftttt!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-20 12:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n56tm1$g3u$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #540360 |
On 12/19/2015 6:56 PM, Raymond Yohros wrote: > On Saturday, 19 December 2015 10:10:24 UTC-5, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> Black holes at the heart of galaxies could swell to 50 billion times >>> the mass of the sun before losing the discs of gas they rely on to >>> sustain themselves, according to research at the University of >>> Leicester. >>> >> > > it is beautiful how nature shows simplicity of structure > and functionality in every process with striking similarities similarities are human judgements > > how MatterEnergy and information can travel through black holes nope. > through > spacetime to form and/or feed quasars and galaxies like the umbilical cord > of a mother to her child. what is similar there ? not scale, shape, or process, or meaning, > > from the stem of a mushroom, or the eye of a tornado or a hurricane, > or the black center of an eye itself you talking about a black spot ? (google black spot ) again no scale, no process, no meaning, just abstraction of shapes > the elegance is seen all over the place > with things that most people will take for granted except to stoners > > this are no coincidences. there are only coincidences. > they represent proof of a common design > through out the universe no. it only illistrates malfunctioning brain patterns that assigns strong relationship to simplistic shapes > and if we learn to understand it and use it > it will help us improve our own way of life with a brighter consciousness > a better future. so how is the Black Spot going to improve your brighter consciousness into a better future ? Are you going to buy round solar panels ? > > the awakening is truly really near (and that is also not a coincidence) > the time when all fields of science will add up to the quest > to the ultimate answer to everything consult the Ascended Masters https://thelightworkers.wordpress.com/tag/invoking-the-ascended-masters-and-higher-god/ > > r.y > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-20 09:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7cd9b726-b164-4e88-836a-7cd1ec0c5930@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540252 |
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 7:10:24 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food > crumbles into stars according to research > > http://phys.org/news/2015-12-black-holes-large-billion-suns.html > > > > Black holes at the heart of galaxies could swell to 50 billion times > > the mass of the sun before losing the discs of gas they rely on to > > sustain themselves, according to research at the University of > > Leicester. > > > > In a study titled 'How Big Can a Black Hole Grow?', Professor Andrew > > King from the University of Leicester's Department of Physics and > > Astronomy explores supermassive black holes at the centre of > > galaxies, around which are regions of space where gas settles into an > > orbiting disc. > > > > This gas can lose energy and fall inwards, feeding the black hole. > > But these discs are known to be unstable and prone to crumbling into > > stars. > > > > Professor King calculated how big a black hole would have to be for > > its outer edge to keep a disc from forming, coming up with the figure > > of 50 billion solar masses. > > > > > > From the physics perspective, the only limit to black hole growth is > the availability of something to fall in. After that is is the VERY > SLOW evaporation (~10^80 years) until they are all gone. > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Make that 50 trillion Suns,and counting. Good reason for this thinking It fits with reality TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-23 17:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <af006b04-bccb-43b9-bb6e-20d281d21fee@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540445 |
On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 9:52:49 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 7:10:24 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > > Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food > > crumbles into stars according to research > > > http://phys.org/news/2015-12-black-holes-large-billion-suns.html > > > > > > > Black holes at the heart of galaxies could swell to 50 billion times > > > the mass of the sun before losing the discs of gas they rely on to > > > sustain themselves, according to research at the University of > > > Leicester. > > > > > > In a study titled 'How Big Can a Black Hole Grow?', Professor Andrew > > > King from the University of Leicester's Department of Physics and > > > Astronomy explores supermassive black holes at the centre of > > > galaxies, around which are regions of space where gas settles into an > > > orbiting disc. > > > > > > This gas can lose energy and fall inwards, feeding the black hole. > > > But these discs are known to be unstable and prone to crumbling into > > > stars. > > > > > > Professor King calculated how big a black hole would have to be for > > > its outer edge to keep a disc from forming, coming up with the figure > > > of 50 billion solar masses. > > > > > > > > > > > From the physics perspective, the only limit to black hole growth is > > the availability of something to fall in. After that is is the VERY > > SLOW evaporation (~10^80 years) until they are all gone. > > > > -- > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > > community, and physics-related social issues. > > Make that 50 trillion Suns,and counting. Good reason for this thinking It fits with reality TreBert When a BB reaches its critical mass density it explodes before even one more electron can enter.Trebert.Good reason for this
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-23 19:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <fbOdnQThEJfT1ubLnZ2dnUU7-X-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #541182 |
On 12/23/15 7:31 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> When a BB reaches its critical mass density it explodes
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-24 12:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <233de338-5578-4cda-a85b-775189cdb446@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #541183 |
On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 5:33:05 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/23/15 7:31 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > When a BB reaches its critical mass density it explodes > > > > ## # > ## # > ######################################### > ######################################### > ## ###### > ## ########## > ############ > ############## > ############# > ############# > ############## > ############# > ############## > ############# > ############## > ############# # > ############# # > ######################################### > ######################################### > # > > ######## > ############### > ################## > ##################### > #### #### > ## ## > ## ## > ## ## > ## ### > ## ## > #### #### > ##################### > ################## > ############### > ######## > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. 90 trillion microbes in our 30 tirllion body cells.That tells you nature deal in big numbers.BH can hold all there is,and not reach critical mass density till the last electron goes to its core. That is reality when I think of BH TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-27 07:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <95aeeeee-cb2f-4533-87a9-7ae325f6130d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #541314 |
how quoted text - 90 trillion microbes in our 30 tirllion body cells.That tells you nature deal in big numbers.BH can hold all there is,and not reach critical mass density till the last electron goes to its core. That is reality when I think of BH TreBert ------- I know I am just punishing myself for asking this question but.... Bert, if that were true, how can there be black holes of different masses? With one simple question I laid waste to your foolish 'mass density' (cough) theory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-27 04:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r7mdnVnUSO-mKOLLnZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #540252 |
On 19/12/2015 10:10 AM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Black holes could grow as large as 50 billion suns before their food > crumbles into stars according to research >> http://phys.org/news/2015-12-black-holes-large-billion-suns.html > >> Black holes at the heart of galaxies could swell to 50 billion times >> the mass of the sun before losing the discs of gas they rely on to >> sustain themselves, according to research at the University of >> Leicester. > > From the physics perspective, the only limit to black hole growth is > the availability of something to fall in. After that is is the VERY > SLOW evaporation (~10^80 years) until they are all gone. Well, wasn't it only a few years ago that they said that blackholes couldn't get much larger than a 1 billion solar masses? Then they promptly discovered several 10 billion solar mass ones. Forgive if I don't buy this study. :) Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-27 04:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <92f2c165-8dbe-4422-8f7a-9f018554ddc8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #541764 |
They still talk about BHs with no spin. BHs *are* spin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-27 12:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <yoGdnT10cJIYsR3LnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #541778 |
On 12/27/15 6:54 AM, john wrote: > They still talk about BHs with no spin. > BHs *are* spin. > Most likely most black holes have non-zero angular momentum. But one can't say for sure until it is measured. Review | Black Holes > http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BlackHole.html -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-28 13:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0b048241-bfd7-4a8d-af1e-b61a77f38fc1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #541812 |
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 10:23:04 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/27/15 6:54 AM, john wrote: > > They still talk about BHs with no spin. > > BHs *are* spin. > > > > Most likely most black holes have non-zero angular momentum. > But one can't say for sure until it is measured. > > Review | Black Holes > > http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BlackHole.html > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Sam WOW Reality is the accretion disk proves that BH have spin.Also not all BHs are exactly alike. They can become more dense as a certain mass density is reached.In the QM realm taking away space between particles can be done by BH.O Ya Time too TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-28 15:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hZadne3HkYojMRzLnZ2dnUU7-WsAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #541997 |
On 12/28/15 3:02 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > Reality is the accretion disk proves that BH have spin. Water forms a vortex going down the drain, yet the drain is not spinning, reber. Black hole rotation is not a requirement for accretion disks to form. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-28 15:45 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hZadnezHkYrtMBzLnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #541997 |
On 12/28/15 3:02 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Reality is the accretion disk proves that BH have spin
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-28 15:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <795b8d33-09b5-46ad-aaf7-509f01c310d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #542007 |
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 1:45:22 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/28/15 3:02 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > Reality is the accretion disk proves that BH have spin > > > > ## # > ## # > ######################################### > ######################################### > ## ###### > ## ########## > ############ > ############## > ############# > ############# > ############## > ############# > ############## > ############# > ############## > ############# # > ############# # > ######################################### > ######################################### > # > > ######## > ############### > ################## > ##################### > #### #### > ## ## > ## ## > ## ## > ## ### > ## ## > #### #### > ##################### > ################## > ############### > ######## > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Reality is the disk gives away the BH.You can't get the picture.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-28 18:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2228f389-74c0-4937-9a5a-5ccae6cdb042@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #542024 |
So- Gravity produced by the matter crushes that same matter so small that it disappears. A black hole. 21st century physics!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web