Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #535878 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-27 07:53 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-11-30 03:29 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 91 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-27 07:53 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 10:09 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-28 09:41 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:36 -0800
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-28 17:17 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-28 14:23 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 00:49 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 02:50 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-29 14:10 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 09:01 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 15:12 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-29 11:41 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 18:10 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-01 16:41 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-08 16:36 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-09 02:01 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:34 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:29 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-30 14:57 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-30 09:12 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-30 16:32 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-30 16:40 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-01 01:24 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-01 16:58 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-02 00:48 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 13:20 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:38 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:32 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-29 22:24 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 07:39 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-30 15:16 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 16:42 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-01 01:23 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-01 16:50 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-02 00:46 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-28 13:30 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-28 14:18 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-02 09:10 -0600
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-02 15:37 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-28 17:58 +0000
where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-28 20:04 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-29 01:54 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 08:21 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:26 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:38 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 14:51 -0800
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-29 19:31 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 08:03 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 07:58 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 13:18 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 17:29 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 19:27 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 19:33 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-01 18:40 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-01 20:37 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-01 23:27 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-02 02:08 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-02 10:02 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-02 23:31 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-03 11:07 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-03 16:43 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-04 01:49 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-04 03:18 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-02 02:23 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-01 04:40 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:50 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 03:55 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:39 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:39 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-30 00:06 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:35 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-30 15:51 +0000
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 15:36 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 15:51 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:32 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-30 08:13 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 13:18 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-01 18:42 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-01 20:37 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-12-01 23:02 -0500
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-02 05:43 -0800
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-02 10:32 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-02 12:40 -0800
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 04:35 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 03:44 -0600
Re: where did the remains go? .....Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-30 15:55 +0000
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-29 15:26 -0500
Re: Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-30 03:29 -0500
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 07:53 -0600 |
| Subject | Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM |
| Message-ID | <aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the building was rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus propaganda about a 757. "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent with a ship sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs and the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the gash in the ground was there before 9/11? Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 10:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #535878 |
"Rocky" wrote in message news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the building was rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus propaganda about a 757. "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent with a ship sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs and the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the gash in the ground was there before 9/11? Rocky *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger interference. Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 09:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #535932 |
"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... > "Rocky" wrote in message > news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... > > Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the building > was > rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus propaganda > about > a 757. > > "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 > NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM > > And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent with a > ship > sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs and > the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the gash > in > the ground was there before 9/11? > > Rocky > > > *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at > Boston's Logan airport. > Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. > Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned > The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self > destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger > interference. > > Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, tell us > then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, it had to be > somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single airport reported the > unscheduled landing of an airliner full of scared shitless passengers and > a compliment of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling > "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so you can scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in flight. BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had the real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the ground were there pre 9/11. And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if two jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by 3D software? And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and that is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of the Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a vaporized building. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 08:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536081 |
"Rocky" wrote in message news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... > "Rocky" wrote in message > news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... > > Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the > building was > rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus > propaganda about > a 757. > > "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 > NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM > > And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent > with a ship > sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with > CGIs and > the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the > gash in > the ground was there before 9/11? > > Rocky > > > *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at > Boston's Logan airport. > Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. > Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned > The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self > destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger > interference. > > Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, > tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, > it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single > airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of > scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim > fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you > demented asshole troll. ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so you can scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in flight. BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had the real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the ground were there pre 9/11. And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if two jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by 3D software? And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and that is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of the Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a vaporized building. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 17:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #536085 |
Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: > > > "Rocky" wrote in message > news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... > > > "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >> "Rocky" wrote in message >> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >> >> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >> building was >> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >> propaganda about >> a 757. >> >> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >> >> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >> with a ship >> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >> CGIs and >> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the >> gash in >> the ground was there before 9/11? >> >> Rocky >> >> >> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at >> Boston's Logan airport. >> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >> interference. >> >> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >> demented asshole troll. > > ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so > you can > scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either > completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in > flight. > > BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had > the > real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in > Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the > ground > were there pre 9/11. > > And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if > two > jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by > 3D > software? > > And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and > that > is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of > the > Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a > vaporized > building. See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > > > *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think most > of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once again, > those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and your > mentally challenged conspiracy peers. I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than Michael Jackson fans. These are the kind of fucktards who dishonor the brave people who lost their lives trying to help the victims. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "When the students and newsgroups and world is ready, the master appears" - Edmond Wollmann, trying ever so hard to be modest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 14:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536089 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> >> "Rocky" wrote in message >> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >> >> >> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>> >>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>> building was >>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>> propaganda about >>> a 757. >>> >>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>> >>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>> with a ship >>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>> CGIs and >>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because the >>> gash in >>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked at >>> Boston's Logan airport. >>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>> interference. >>> >>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>> demented asshole troll. >> >> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >> you can >> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were either >> completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned bogus in >> flight. >> >> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have had >> the >> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in the >> ground >> were there pre 9/11. >> >> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And if >> two >> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated by >> 3D >> software? >> >> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie and >> that >> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains of >> the >> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >> vaporized >> building. See: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >> >> >> >> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think most >> of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once again, >> those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and your >> mentally challenged conspiracy peers. > > I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both Rocky > and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than Michael > Jackson fans. BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. DUH. Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized building. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 00:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #536129 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> >>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>> >>> >>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>> >>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>> building was >>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>> propaganda about >>>> a 757. >>>> >>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>> >>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>> with a ship >>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>> CGIs and >>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>> the gash in >>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>>> interference. >>>> >>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>>> demented asshole troll. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >>> you can >>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned >>> bogus in flight. >>> >>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>> had the >>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>> the ground >>> were there pre 9/11. >>> >>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>> if two >>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated >>> by 3D >>> software? >>> >>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>> and that >>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>> of the >>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>> vaporized >>> building. See: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and >>> your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >> >> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than >> Michael Jackson fans. > > BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to > have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second > delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. > DUH. Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe other than provable facts? > Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced > with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of > the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized > building. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources is enough to show everyone your agenda. > The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with > the 9/11 BULLSHIT. With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, murderer? -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "When the students and newsgroups and world is ready, the master appears" - Edmond Wollmann, trying ever so hard to be modest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 02:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536248 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>> building was >>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>> propaganda about >>>>> a 757. >>>>> >>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>> >>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>> with a ship >>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>> CGIs and >>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>> the gash in >>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>>>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>>>> interference. >>>>> >>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>>>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>>>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>>>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>>>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>>>> demented asshole troll. >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >>>> you can >>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned >>>> bogus in flight. >>>> >>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>> had the >>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>> the ground >>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>> >>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>> if two >>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated >>>> by 3D >>>> software? >>>> >>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>> and that >>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>> of the >>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>> vaporized >>>> building. See: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and >>>> your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>> >>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than >>> Michael Jackson fans. >> >> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >> DUH. > > Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I would > indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to have > forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. > > For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they have > to all be wrong to fit your claims. > > A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your CGI > claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe other > than provable facts? > >> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of >> the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized >> building. >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to > mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but trotting > out a completely discredited website with no other sources is enough to > show everyone your agenda. > >> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with >> the 9/11 BULLSHIT. > > With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't a > Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts of > those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of this > to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you a traitor > and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, murderer? Just look at the facts for yourself. The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep underground MRR nukes. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 14:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n3f111$gp2$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #536311 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Just look at the facts for yourself. Rocky the kooktard post facts? Very unlikely! >The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or losing >parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be a >lot softer than birds and I doubt that. I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed of the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose parts! >And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on >top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is >what happened We know from many videos that the lower 40-60 stories of the cores from the towers remained standing for many seconds (this also disproves your "vaporization" bullshit BTW) before they, too, collapsed. So the core remains would be on top of the huge pile that you show in your blast3.jpeg picture (the one with all the kookscribbles added).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 09:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <OrWdnT1pY4gjjsbLnZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536338 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n3f111$gp2$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>Just look at the facts for yourself. > > Rocky the kooktard post facts? Very unlikely! > >>The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >>losing >>parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would have to be >>a >>lot softer than birds and I doubt that. > > I posted many times that the planes did slow down. Calculate the speed of > the plane immediately before impact. Find the time between when first > contact was made and the time the first debris exited the other side. > Divide the size of the tower by this time to get the speed of the debris. > You'll find it is less, so it did slow down. And obviously it did lose > parts! ROTFLMAO because the jet engine found doesn't match the jet it was supposed to be from and there were no holes big enough for those parts to fly out of so that indicates the CGIs were on both sides of the buildings. >>And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up on >>top? Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building but that is >>what happened > > We know from many videos that the lower 40-60 stories of the cores from > the towers remained standing for many seconds (this also disproves your > "vaporization" bullshit BTW) before they, too, collapsed. So the core > remains would be on top of the huge pile that you show in your blast3.jpeg > picture (the one with all the kookscribbles added). But if the cores went down it was only ultra fine dust and oddly enough MRR nukes do that to buildings. BTW where do you think I learned about MRR nukes? <G> Fact remains that you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission can not explain why the very bottom of the Twin Towers had Survivors and multi-floor Surviving Corners but deep underground MRR nukes can. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 15:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #536311 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>> building was >>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>> a 757. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>> >>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>>> with a ship >>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>>> CGIs and >>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>>> the gash in >>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after >>>>>> all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a >>>>>> single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner >>>>>> full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented >>>>>> Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah >>>>>> Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>> so you can >>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>> >>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>>> had the >>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>>> the ground >>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>> >>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>>> if two >>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>> software? >>>>> >>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>>> and that >>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>>> of the >>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>> vaporized >>>>> building. See: >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you >>>>> and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>> >>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>> >>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >>> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >>> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >>> DUH. >> >> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to >> have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. >> >> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they >> have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >> >> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your >> CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe >> other than provable facts? >> >>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >>> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains >>> of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a >>> vaporized building. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to >> mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >> >>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >> >> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't >> a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts >> of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of >> this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you >> a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, >> murderer? Evasions noted. > > Just look at the facts for yourself. I asked you for something other than the same silly and much discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It would help if it were credible. > The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or > losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would > have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? Same principle. > And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up > on top? It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. > Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. > but > that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before > they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep > underground MRR nukes. So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave the bottem? This is comedy gold. > See: http://www.kooksdaily/DE-Kookified!!!1!!! It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or the site vetted by Homeland Security? Why do you keep dodging my questions? -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "I am a good counselor WITHOUT any degree." - Ed speaks TRVTH.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 11:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536348 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>>> building was >>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>>>> with a ship >>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>>>> CGIs and >>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>>>> the gash in >>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after >>>>>>> all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a >>>>>>> single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner >>>>>>> full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented >>>>>>> Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah >>>>>>> Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>>> so you can >>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>>>> had the >>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>>>> the ground >>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>> >>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>>>> if two >>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>> software? >>>>>> >>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>>>> and that >>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>>>> of the >>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>> vaporized >>>>>> building. See: >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you >>>>>> and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>> >>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>>> >>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >>>> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >>>> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >>>> DUH. >>> >>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to >>> have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. >>> >>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they >>> have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>> >>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your >>> CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe >>> other than provable facts? >>> >>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >>>> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains >>>> of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a >>>> vaporized building. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to >>> mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >>> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >>> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>> >>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>> >>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't >>> a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts >>> of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of >>> this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you >>> a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, >>> murderer? > > Evasions noted. > >> >> Just look at the facts for yourself. > > I asked you for something other than the same silly and much discredited > site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It would help if it > were credible. > >> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >> losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers would >> have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. > > Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? > Same principle. > >> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends up >> on top? > > It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. > >> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building > > First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH >> but >> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before >> they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >> underground MRR nukes. > > So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave the > bottem? This is comedy gold. If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they were with the Twin Towers then they can't reach the far side so that side will remain standing as proven by: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an idiot. >> See: http://www.kooksdaily/DE-Kookified!!!1!!! Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT > It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists issuing > propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or the site > vetted by Homeland Security? > > Why do you keep dodging my questions? Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and don't say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your eyes? The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but CGIs and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but vaporized buildings. And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent with people that were behind 9/11. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 18:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA56185FA5F837stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #536354 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>>>> building was >>>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is >>>>>>>> consistent with a ship >>>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent >>>>>>>> with CGIs and >>>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS >>>>>>>> because the gash in >>>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were >>>>>>>> hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. >>>>>>>> So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? >>>>>>>> after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not >>>>>>>> a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an >>>>>>>> airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of >>>>>>>> demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling >>>>>>>> "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>>>> so you can >>>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might >>>>>>> have had the >>>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land >>>>>>> in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those >>>>>>> marks in the ground >>>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? >>>>>>> And if two >>>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>>> software? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad >>>>>>> movie and that >>>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the >>>>>>> remains of the >>>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>>> vaporized >>>>>>> building. See: >>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jp >>>>>>> eg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But >>>>>>> once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc >>>>>>> among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>>>> >>>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have >>>>> to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 >>>>> second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to >>>>> their videos. DUH. >>>> >>>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem >>>> to have forgotten about the public access channels and weather >>>> stations. >>>> >>>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But >>>> they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>>> >>>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. >>>> Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't >>>> believe other than provable facts? >>>> >>>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily >>>>> reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and >>>>> the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed >>>>> building but a vaporized building. >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpe >>>>> g >>>> >>>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed >>>> to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >>>> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >>>> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>>> >>>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>>> >>>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it >>>> wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal >>>> efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated >>>> belittling of this to be something a terrorist and propagandist >>>> would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are >>>> you attached to, murderer? >> >> Evasions noted. >> >>> >>> Just look at the facts for yourself. >> >> I asked you for something other than the same silly and much >> discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It >> would help if it were credible. >> >>> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >>> losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers >>> would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. >> >> Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? >> Same principle. >> >>> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends >>> up on top? >> >> It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. >> >>> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building >> >> First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. > > It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of > cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH Cards are a different sorty than concrete and steel. I'll bet you don't have airplanes flying into them at 500MPH either. >>> but >>> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before >>> they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >>> underground MRR nukes. >> >> So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave >> the bottem? This is comedy gold. > > If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they > were with the Twin Towers No proof of that statement was ever introduced. Invalid argument. > then they can't reach the far side so that > side will remain standing as proven by: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg That's not proof. That's just some idiot(s) playing with Photoshop. > Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an > idiot. Projection noted and ridiculed. >>> See: http://www.kooksdaily/DE-Kookified!!!1!!! > > Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT I'ts a kooky link. I lived up to its expectations. >> It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists >> issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or >> the site vetted by Homeland Security? >> >> Why do you keep dodging my questions? > > Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and don't > say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your eyes? I asked first. Please answer me. > The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but CGIs > and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but vaporized > buildings. Please tell me that you have other evidence other than that kok site. > And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent > with people that were behind 9/11. That's righ. What people? The brave Americans who risked, and sometimes gave their lives, to help those who were in distress? If those are whom you are referring to, you truly are a vile piece of shit. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "God speaks to me, that's why I can read the heavens." - Edmo, clearly losing it. This signature was made by SigChanger. You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-01 16:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k7mdnSaKgL7vv8PLnZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536361 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA56185FA5F837stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>> news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>>>>> building was >>>>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is >>>>>>>>> consistent with a ship >>>>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent >>>>>>>>> with CGIs and >>>>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS >>>>>>>>> because the gash in >>>>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were >>>>>>>>> hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. >>>>>>>>> So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? >>>>>>>>> after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not >>>>>>>>> a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an >>>>>>>>> airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of >>>>>>>>> demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling >>>>>>>>> "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>>>>> so you can >>>>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might >>>>>>>> have had the >>>>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land >>>>>>>> in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those >>>>>>>> marks in the ground >>>>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? >>>>>>>> And if two >>>>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>>>> software? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad >>>>>>>> movie and that >>>>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the >>>>>>>> remains of the >>>>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>>>> vaporized >>>>>>>> building. See: >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jp >>>>>>>> eg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But >>>>>>>> once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc >>>>>>>> among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>>>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>>>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>>>>> >>>>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have >>>>>> to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 >>>>>> second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to >>>>>> their videos. DUH. >>>>> >>>>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>>>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem >>>>> to have forgotten about the public access channels and weather >>>>> stations. >>>>> >>>>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But >>>>> they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>>>> >>>>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. >>>>> Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't >>>>> believe other than provable facts? >>>>> >>>>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily >>>>>> reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and >>>>>> the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed >>>>>> building but a vaporized building. >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpe >>>>>> g >>>>> >>>>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed >>>>> to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >>>>> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >>>>> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>>>> >>>>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>>>> >>>>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it >>>>> wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal >>>>> efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated >>>>> belittling of this to be something a terrorist and propagandist >>>>> would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are >>>>> you attached to, murderer? >>> >>> Evasions noted. >>> >>>> >>>> Just look at the facts for yourself. >>> >>> I asked you for something other than the same silly and much >>> discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. It >>> would help if it were credible. >>> >>>> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down or >>>> losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin Towers >>>> would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. >>> >>> Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a tornado? >>> Same principle. >>> >>>> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what ends >>>> up on top? >>> >>> It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. >>> >>>> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building >>> >>> First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. >> >> It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of >> cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH > > Cards are a different sorty than concrete and steel. I'll bet you don't > have airplanes flying into them at 500MPH either. > >>>> but >>>> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before >>>> they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >>>> underground MRR nukes. >>> >>> So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave >>> the bottem? This is comedy gold. >> >> If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they >> were with the Twin Towers > > No proof of that statement was ever introduced. Invalid argument. ROTFLMAO because you are trying to say that something else could vaporize the Twin Towers besides nukes. Ok what then? <G> And don't forget they have to be vaporized before they can crush the bottom of the Twin Towers as in the following photo: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > >> then they can't reach the far side so that >> side will remain standing as proven by: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > That's not proof. That's just some idiot(s) playing with Photoshop. ROTFLMAO because there are a lot of photos of what was left of the Twin Towers but people were not allowed to take photos of the big holes left by the MRR nukes. But some photos of the holes in the rock still made it out. <G> >> Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an >> idiot. > > Projection noted and ridiculed. And yet you are the one with no explaination for why so much remained at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> See: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT > > I'ts a kooky link. I lived up to its expectations. But the link you hate so much is consistent with a lot of other photos taken of the remains of the Twin Towers that prove they were vaporized before they could get to the ground and crush what was not vaporized. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists >>> issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been or >>> the site vetted by Homeland Security? >>> >>> Why do you keep dodging my questions? >> >> Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and don't >> say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your eyes? > > I asked first. Please answer me. Look at all the questions that were left un-answered by the 911 Commission or NIST and you bitch at me when you should be bitching at them. Boy are you ever one-sided. >> The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but CGIs >> and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but vaporized >> buildings. > > Please tell me that you have other evidence other than that kok site. All you have to do is run any of your alleged impact videos in slow motion and you will notice the jet disappears before it goes into the Twin Towers just like CGIs do. And don't forget we were not allowed to see what happened right after the CGI flew into the South Tower because explosives were needed to make the roadrunner cutouts. <G> >> And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent >> with people that were behind 9/11. > > That's righ. What people? The brave Americans who risked, and sometimes > gave their lives, to help those who were in distress? If those are whom > you are referring to, you truly are a vile piece of shit. All you have proven in you never tried to figure out what happened on 9/11 yourself. You let mainstream media tell you everything even though they do not explain anything. Like why didn't they investigate the alleged hijackers after 9/11 and see how many were still living? Instead they made the accused come forward and try to get their names removed from the list of 19 patsies. BTW that is why the pilot of the alleged Flight 77 had to be changed to a rookie because the person they originally say piloted the plane was still living. <G> The 9/11 Commission was the biggest joke on mankind next to the Warren Commission. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-02 00:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA563C8E1C52EEstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #536820 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:k7mdnSaKgL7vv8PLnZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA56185FA5F837stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>> news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>>>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe >>>>>>>>>> the building was >>>>>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is >>>>>>>>>> consistent with a ship >>>>>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent >>>>>>>>>> with CGIs and >>>>>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS >>>>>>>>>> because the gash in >>>>>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were >>>>>>>>>> hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but >>>>>>>>>> was self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side >>>>>>>>>> because of passenger interference. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. >>>>>>>>>> So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? >>>>>>>>>> after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and >>>>>>>>>> not a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an >>>>>>>>>> airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment >>>>>>>>>> of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling >>>>>>>>>> "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar >>>>>>>>> readings so you can >>>>>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might >>>>>>>>> have had the >>>>>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land >>>>>>>>> in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those >>>>>>>>> marks in the ground >>>>>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? >>>>>>>>> And if two >>>>>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>>>>> software? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad >>>>>>>>> movie and that >>>>>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the >>>>>>>>> remains of the >>>>>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>>>>> vaporized >>>>>>>>> building. See: >>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3. >>>>>>>>> jp eg >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I >>>>>>>>> think most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. >>>>>>>>> But once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises >>>>>>>>> havoc among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from >>>>>>>> both Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are >>>>>>>> dumber than Michael Jackson fans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have >>>>>>> to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 >>>>>>> second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to >>>>>>> their videos. DUH. >>>>>> >>>>>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>>>>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You >>>>>> seem to have forgotten about the public access channels and >>>>>> weather stations. >>>>>> >>>>>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But >>>>>> they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>>>>> >>>>>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. >>>>>> Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you >>>>>> don't believe other than provable facts? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily >>>>>>> reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" >>>>>>> and the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed >>>>>>> building but a vaporized building. >>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.j >>>>>>> pe g >>>>>> >>>>>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's >>>>>> designed to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually >>>>>> happens but trotting out a completely discredited website with no >>>>>> other sources is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>>>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>>>>> >>>>>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it >>>>>> wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the >>>>>> exceptonal efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your >>>>>> repeated belittling of this to be something a terrorist and >>>>>> propagandist would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? >>>>>> Which cell are you attached to, murderer? >>>> >>>> Evasions noted. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just look at the facts for yourself. >>>> >>>> I asked you for something other than the same silly and much >>>> discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. >>>> It would help if it were credible. >>>> >>>>> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down >>>>> or losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin >>>>> Towers would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. >>>> >>>> Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a >>>> tornado? Same principle. >>>> >>>>> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what >>>>> ends up on top? >>>> >>>> It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. >>>> >>>>> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building >>>> >>>> First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. >>> >>> It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of >>> cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH >> >> Cards are a different sorty than concrete and steel. I'll bet you >> don't have airplanes flying into them at 500MPH either. >> >>>>> but >>>>> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized >>>>> before they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >>>>> underground MRR nukes. >>>> >>>> So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave >>>> the bottem? This is comedy gold. >>> >>> If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they >>> were with the Twin Towers >> >> No proof of that statement was ever introduced. Invalid argument. > > ROTFLMAO because you are trying to say that something else could > vaporize the Twin Towers besides nukes. Ok what then? <G> > > And don't forget they have to be vaporized before they can crush the > bottom of the Twin Towers as in the following photo: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg You keep claiming they were "vaporized". They weren't. >> >>> then they can't reach the far side so that >>> side will remain standing as proven by: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> That's not proof. That's just some idiot(s) playing with Photoshop. > > ROTFLMAO because there are a lot of photos of what was left of the > Twin Towers but people were not allowed to take photos of the big > holes left by the MRR nukes. But some photos of the holes in the rock > still made it out. <G> Damn, you *do* go off the deep end. >>> Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an >>> idiot. >> >> Projection noted and ridiculed. > > And yet you are the one with no explaination for why so much remained > at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw Uh, gravity? >>>>> See: >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw >>> >>> Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT >> >> I'ts a kooky link. I lived up to its expectations. > > But the link you hate so much is consistent with a lot of other photos > taken of the remains of the Twin Towers that prove they were vaporized > before they could get to the ground and crush what was not vaporized. > <G> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw Don't confuse hate with distrust and ridicule. >>>> It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists >>>> issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been >>>> or the site vetted by Homeland Security? >>>> >>>> Why do you keep dodging my questions? >>> >>> Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and >>> don't say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your >>> eyes? >> >> I asked first. Please answer me. > > Look at all the questions that were left un-answered by the 911 > Commission or NIST and you bitch at me when you should be bitching at > them. Boy are you ever one-sided. Further evasions noted and ridiculed. >>> The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but >>> CGIs and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but >>> vaporized buildings. >> >> Please tell me that you have other evidence other than that kok site. > > All you have to do is run any of your alleged impact videos in slow > motion and you will notice the jet disappears before it goes into the > Twin Towers just like CGIs do. "my" videos? What the hell are you babbling about now? > And don't forget we were not allowed > to see what happened right after the CGI flew into the South Tower > because explosives were needed to make the roadrunner cutouts. <G> "We"? Damn, you just get more incoherent by the post. >>> And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent >>> with people that were behind 9/11. >> >> That's righ. What people? The brave Americans who risked, and >> sometimes gave their lives, to help those who were in distress? If >> those are whom you are referring to, you truly are a vile piece of >> shit. > > All you have proven in you never tried to figure out what happened on > 9/11 yourself. You let mainstream media tell you everything even > though they do not explain anything. Like why didn't they investigate > the alleged hijackers after 9/11 and see how many were still living? > Instead they made the accused come forward and try to get their names > removed from the list of 19 patsies. BTW that is why the pilot of the > alleged Flight 77 had to be changed to a rookie because the person > they originally say piloted the plane was still living. <G> > > The 9/11 Commission was the biggest joke on mankind next to the Warren > Commission. You forgot to mention the kook sites you keep thinking have anything worth while. If they had any kind of evidence, there would be every landshark in the US looking for a piece of that pie. Damn, you are thicker than a whale sandwich. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "The more you spam me, the less spam I get" -Edmond Wollmann, once again focusing with laserlike precision and crystal clarity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 16:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <oqydnXxX-KAuxvrLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536869 |
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:XnsA563C8E1C52EEstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:k7mdnSaKgL7vv8PLnZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA56185FA5F837stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>> news:PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>> news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>>> news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>>>>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe >>>>>>>>>>> the building was >>>>>>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is >>>>>>>>>>> consistent with a ship >>>>>>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent >>>>>>>>>>> with CGIs and >>>>>>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS >>>>>>>>>>> because the gash in >>>>>>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were >>>>>>>>>>> hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but >>>>>>>>>>> was self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side >>>>>>>>>>> because of passenger interference. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. >>>>>>>>>>> So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? >>>>>>>>>>> after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and >>>>>>>>>>> not a single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an >>>>>>>>>>> airliner full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment >>>>>>>>>>> of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling >>>>>>>>>>> "Allah Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar >>>>>>>>>> readings so you can >>>>>>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might >>>>>>>>>> have had the >>>>>>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land >>>>>>>>>> in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those >>>>>>>>>> marks in the ground >>>>>>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? >>>>>>>>>> And if two >>>>>>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>>>>>> software? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad >>>>>>>>>> movie and that >>>>>>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the >>>>>>>>>> remains of the >>>>>>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>>>>>> vaporized >>>>>>>>>> building. See: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3. >>>>>>>>>> jp eg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I >>>>>>>>>> think most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. >>>>>>>>>> But once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises >>>>>>>>>> havoc among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from >>>>>>>>> both Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are >>>>>>>>> dumber than Michael Jackson fans. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have >>>>>>>> to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 >>>>>>>> second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to >>>>>>>> their videos. DUH. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>>>>>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You >>>>>>> seem to have forgotten about the public access channels and >>>>>>> weather stations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But >>>>>>> they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. >>>>>>> Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you >>>>>>> don't believe other than provable facts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily >>>>>>>> reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" >>>>>>>> and the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed >>>>>>>> building but a vaporized building. >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.j >>>>>>>> pe g >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's >>>>>>> designed to mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually >>>>>>> happens but trotting out a completely discredited website with no >>>>>>> other sources is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>>>>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it >>>>>>> wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the >>>>>>> exceptonal efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find your >>>>>>> repeated belittling of this to be something a terrorist and >>>>>>> propagandist would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? >>>>>>> Which cell are you attached to, murderer? >>>>> >>>>> Evasions noted. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just look at the facts for yourself. >>>>> >>>>> I asked you for something other than the same silly and much >>>>> discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. >>>>> It would help if it were credible. >>>>> >>>>>> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing down >>>>>> or losing parts and for that to happen in real life the Twin >>>>>> Towers would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt that. >>>>> >>>>> Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a >>>>> tornado? Same principle. >>>>> >>>>>> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what >>>>>> ends up on top? >>>>> >>>>> It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. >>>>> >>>>>> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building >>>>> >>>>> First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. >>>> >>>> It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of >>>> cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. DUH >>> >>> Cards are a different sorty than concrete and steel. I'll bet you >>> don't have airplanes flying into them at 500MPH either. >>> >>>>>> but >>>>>> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized >>>>>> before they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with deep >>>>>> underground MRR nukes. >>>>> >>>>> So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and leave >>>>> the bottem? This is comedy gold. >>>> >>>> If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like they >>>> were with the Twin Towers >>> >>> No proof of that statement was ever introduced. Invalid argument. >> >> ROTFLMAO because you are trying to say that something else could >> vaporize the Twin Towers besides nukes. Ok what then? <G> >> >> And don't forget they have to be vaporized before they can crush the >> bottom of the Twin Towers as in the following photo: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > You keep claiming they were "vaporized". They weren't. Keep going because you have forgotten to explain why the top part of the Twin Towers didn't crush the bottom part. DUH You can say all you want but if it is not consistent with what we know about Ground Zero then you are a liar. >>>> then they can't reach the far side so that >>>> side will remain standing as proven by: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> That's not proof. That's just some idiot(s) playing with Photoshop. >> >> ROTFLMAO because there are a lot of photos of what was left of the >> Twin Towers but people were not allowed to take photos of the big >> holes left by the MRR nukes. But some photos of the holes in the rock >> still made it out. <G> > > Damn, you *do* go off the deep end. Keep going because you failed to mention any supporting evidence and that is SOP for those that believe in fairy tales told on prime time news. >>>> Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are an >>>> idiot. >>> >>> Projection noted and ridiculed. >> >> And yet you are the one with no explaination for why so much remained >> at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw > > Uh, gravity? ROTFLMAO because NIST and the 9/11 Commission could not answer why so much remained but you can? You are clearly a clown with the word idiot stamped on your forehead. >>>>>> See: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw >>>> >>>> Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. NOT >>> >>> I'ts a kooky link. I lived up to its expectations. >> >> But the link you hate so much is consistent with a lot of other photos >> taken of the remains of the Twin Towers that prove they were vaporized >> before they could get to the ground and crush what was not vaporized. >> <G> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw > > Don't confuse hate with distrust and ridicule. And why can't you state any facts? Oh but don't feel bad NIST and the 9/11 Commission were just as worthless as you. Again, this is not the remains of a collase but the remains of a nuclear device or two that you have never been schooled about. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists >>>>> issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been >>>>> or the site vetted by Homeland Security? >>>>> >>>>> Why do you keep dodging my questions? >>>> >>>> Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and >>>> don't say you don't see any because all you have to do is open your >>>> eyes? >>> >>> I asked first. Please answer me. >> >> Look at all the questions that were left un-answered by the 911 >> Commission or NIST and you bitch at me when you should be bitching at >> them. Boy are you ever one-sided. > > Further evasions noted and ridiculed. I've caught you making up stories just like NIST and the 9/11 Commission so why do that? If there was any truth to the 19 hijacker bullshit why didn't they prove they died instead of just make us think they did? <G> >>>> The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but >>>> CGIs and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but >>>> vaporized buildings. >>> >>> Please tell me that you have other evidence other than that kok site. >> >> All you have to do is run any of your alleged impact videos in slow >> motion and you will notice the jet disappears before it goes into the >> Twin Towers just like CGIs do. > > "my" videos? What the hell are you babbling about now? Are you trying to say you have no access to videos of jets ramming the Twin Towers? Oh man you are throwing out all the evidence that the public was taken for a ride. >> And don't forget we were not allowed >> to see what happened right after the CGI flew into the South Tower >> because explosives were needed to make the roadrunner cutouts. <G> > > "We"? Damn, you just get more incoherent by the post. There were no marks left by the jets in Nuke York City because they were just CGIs. The holes in the Twin Towers were made by explosives that didn't even line up with the CGIs that were supposed to have left them. That is the main reason you don't see what happened right after the CGIs rammed into the South Tower. They didn't want you to know how the holes were really made. DUH >>>> And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent >>>> with people that were behind 9/11. >>> >>> That's righ. What people? The brave Americans who risked, and >>> sometimes gave their lives, to help those who were in distress? If >>> those are whom you are referring to, you truly are a vile piece of >>> shit. >> >> All you have proven in you never tried to figure out what happened on >> 9/11 yourself. You let mainstream media tell you everything even >> though they do not explain anything. Like why didn't they investigate >> the alleged hijackers after 9/11 and see how many were still living? >> Instead they made the accused come forward and try to get their names >> removed from the list of 19 patsies. BTW that is why the pilot of the >> alleged Flight 77 had to be changed to a rookie because the person >> they originally say piloted the plane was still living. <G> >> >> The 9/11 Commission was the biggest joke on mankind next to the Warren >> Commission. > > You forgot to mention the kook sites you keep thinking have anything > worth while. If they had any kind of evidence, there would be every > landshark in the US looking for a piece of that pie. You are the kook that can not even explain where the Twin Towers went or why they couldn't crush what was below them but they were supposed to have crushed WTC3? Nope, that doesn't make sense but underground MRR nukes make sense and explain why Ground Zero was called Ground Zero. > > Damn, you are thicker than a whale sandwich. You haven't done a fcuking thing. All you do is wave your hands in the air without saying anything to support the official bullshit told about 9/11. Fact is the remains of the Twin Towers resemble a place where nuclear devices were detonated and the way the jets flew into the Twin Towers resemble CGIs and both those are easy to prove for yourself if you just look at the evidence. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 02:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA56AD5DFC3DFCstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #538080 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in news:oqydnXxX-KAuxvrLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com: > > "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message > news:XnsA563C8E1C52EEstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:k7mdnSaKgL7vv8PLnZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA56185FA5F837stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>> news:PMSdnb2_58D2pcbLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:XnsA56167E1B57CAstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>>>> news:P_CdnZ6G65pOIcfLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:XnsA560C998DA1A2stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>>>>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe >>>>>>>>>>>> the building was >>>>>>>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack >>>>>>>>>>>> 911 >>>>>>>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent with a ship >>>>>>>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent with CGIs and >>>>>>>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS >>>>>>>>>>>> because the gash in >>>>>>>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were >>>>>>>>>>>> hi-jacked at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but >>>>>>>>>>>> was self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side >>>>>>>>>>>> because of passenger interference. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these >>>>>>>>>>>> facts. So, tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes >>>>>>>>>>>> land ??? after all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile >>>>>>>>>>>> radius and not a single airport reported the unscheduled >>>>>>>>>>>> landing of an airliner full of scared shitless passengers >>>>>>>>>>>> and a compliment of demented Muslim fanatics, wielding >>>>>>>>>>>> box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you demented >>>>>>>>>>>> asshole troll. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar >>>>>>>>>>> readings so you can >>>>>>>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they >>>>>>>>>>> were either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 >>>>>>>>>>> or they turned bogus in flight. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might >>>>>>>>>>> have had the >>>>>>>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't >>>>>>>>>>> land in Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that >>>>>>>>>>> those marks in the ground >>>>>>>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains >>>>>>>>>>> go? And if two >>>>>>>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>>>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>>>>>>> software? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad >>>>>>>>>>> movie and that >>>>>>>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the >>>>>>>>>>> remains of the >>>>>>>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but >>>>>>>>>>> a vaporized >>>>>>>>>>> building. See: >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast >>>>>>>>>>> 3. jp eg >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I >>>>>>>>>>> think most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on >>>>>>>>>>> TV. >>>>>>>>>>> But once again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises >>>>>>>>>>> havoc among you and your mentally challenged conspiracy >>>>>>>>>>> peers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from >>>>>>>>>> both Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are >>>>>>>>>> dumber than Michael Jackson fans. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always >>>>>>>>> have to have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it >>>>>>>>> was a 17 second delay and that gave them plenty of time to add >>>>>>>>> CGIs to their videos. DUH. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, >>>>>>>> I would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You >>>>>>>> seem to have forgotten about the public access channels and >>>>>>>> weather stations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But >>>>>>>> they have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, >>>>>>>> Rocky. Your CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything >>>>>>>> you don't believe other than provable facts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily >>>>>>>>> reproduced with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" >>>>>>>>> and the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed >>>>>>>>> building but a vaporized building. >>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3 >>>>>>>>> .j pe g >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's >>>>>>>> designed to mimic actual physical occurrances with what >>>>>>>> actually happens but trotting out a completely discredited >>>>>>>> website with no other sources is enough to show everyone your >>>>>>>> agenda. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any >>>>>>>>> inconsistencies with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it >>>>>>>> wasn't a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the >>>>>>>> exceptonal efforts of those who exposed the culprits, I find >>>>>>>> your repeated belittling of this to be something a terrorist >>>>>>>> and propagandist would try. Are you a traitor and a terrorist, >>>>>>>> Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, murderer? >>>>>> >>>>>> Evasions noted. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just look at the facts for yourself. >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked you for something other than the same silly and much >>>>>> discredited site you cut and paste every post. I'm still waiting. >>>>>> It would help if it were credible. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The two CGIs flew right into the Twin Towers without slowing >>>>>>> down or losing parts and for that to happen in real life the >>>>>>> Twin Towers would have to be a lot softer than birds and I doubt >>>>>>> that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ever see a piece of straw that has penetrated a tree after a >>>>>> tornado? Same principle. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And just think for a minute. In a real building collapse what >>>>>>> ends up on top? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's going to vary upon multiple conditions. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Certainly not items at the very bottom of the building >>>>>> >>>>>> First off, you haven't established why that wouldn't be the case. >>>>> >>>>> It is not my fault that you have never built any buildings out of >>>>> cards. If you had you would know the cards on top stay on top. >>>>> DUH >>>> >>>> Cards are a different sorty than concrete and steel. I'll bet you >>>> don't have airplanes flying into them at 500MPH either. >>>> >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> that is what happened so the Twin Towers had to be vaporized >>>>>>> before they collapsed and what everybody saw is possible with >>>>>>> deep underground MRR nukes. >>>>>> >>>>>> So underground nukes will vaporize the top of a building and >>>>>> leave the bottem? This is comedy gold. >>>>> >>>>> If the deep underground MRR nukes were are off to one side like >>>>> they were with the Twin Towers >>>> >>>> No proof of that statement was ever introduced. Invalid argument. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you are trying to say that something else could >>> vaporize the Twin Towers besides nukes. Ok what then? <G> >>> >>> And don't forget they have to be vaporized before they can crush the >>> bottom of the Twin Towers as in the following photo: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> You keep claiming they were "vaporized". They weren't. > > Keep going because you have forgotten to explain why the top part of > the Twin Towers didn't crush the bottom part. DUH > > You can say all you want but if it is not consistent with what we know > about Ground Zero then you are a liar. > > >>>>> then they can't reach the far side so that >>>>> side will remain standing as proven by: >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpe >>>>> g >>>> >>>> That's not proof. That's just some idiot(s) playing with Photoshop. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because there are a lot of photos of what was left of the >>> Twin Towers but people were not allowed to take photos of the big >>> holes left by the MRR nukes. But some photos of the holes in the >>> rock still made it out. <G> >> >> Damn, you *do* go off the deep end. > > Keep going because you failed to mention any supporting evidence and > that is SOP for those that believe in fairy tales told on prime time > news. > >>>>> Boy you are so quick to jump to conclusions no wonder why you are >>>>> an idiot. >>>> >>>> Projection noted and ridiculed. >>> >>> And yet you are the one with no explaination for why so much >>> remained at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw >> >> Uh, gravity? > > ROTFLMAO because NIST and the 9/11 Commission could not answer why so > much remained but you can? You are clearly a clown with the word > idiot stamped on your forehead. > >>>>>>> See: >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw >>>>> >>>>> Oh and you have to fcuk with links too. Wow are you a winner. >>>>> NOT >>>> >>>> I'ts a kooky link. I lived up to its expectations. >>> >>> But the link you hate so much is consistent with a lot of other >>> photos taken of the remains of the Twin Towers that prove they were >>> vaporized before they could get to the ground and crush what was not >>> vaporized. <G> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2XG9APhgOw >> >> Don't confuse hate with distrust and ridicule. > > And why can't you state any facts? Oh but don't feel bad NIST and the > 9/11 Commission were just as worthless as you. Again, this is not the > remains of a collase but the remains of a nuclear device or two that > you have never been schooled about. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > >>>>>> It's the same propaganda froma group that may well be terrorists >>>>>> issuing propaganda. Are you a member of that group? Have you been >>>>>> or the site vetted by Homeland Security? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you keep dodging my questions? >>>>> >>>>> Why haven't you ever looked at the inconsistencies with 9/11 and >>>>> don't say you don't see any because all you have to do is open >>>>> your eyes? >>>> >>>> I asked first. Please answer me. >>> >>> Look at all the questions that were left un-answered by the 911 >>> Commission or NIST and you bitch at me when you should be bitching >>> at them. Boy are you ever one-sided. >> >> Further evasions noted and ridiculed. > > I've caught you making up stories just like NIST and the 9/11 > Commission so why do that? If there was any truth to the 19 hijacker > bullshit why didn't they prove they died instead of just make us think > they did? <G> > > >>>>> The jets in Nuke York City were not consistent with real jets but >>>>> CGIs and the collapses were not consistent with collapses but >>>>> vaporized buildings. >>>> >>>> Please tell me that you have other evidence other than that kok >>>> site. >>> >>> All you have to do is run any of your alleged impact videos in slow >>> motion and you will notice the jet disappears before it goes into >>> the Twin Towers just like CGIs do. >> >> "my" videos? What the hell are you babbling about now? > > Are you trying to say you have no access to videos of jets ramming the > Twin Towers? Oh man you are throwing out all the evidence that the > public was taken for a ride. > >>> And don't forget we were not allowed >>> to see what happened right after the CGI flew into the South Tower >>> because explosives were needed to make the roadrunner cutouts. <G> >> >> "We"? Damn, you just get more incoherent by the post. > > There were no marks left by the jets in Nuke York City because they > were just CGIs. The holes in the Twin Towers were made by explosives > that didn't even line up with the CGIs that were supposed to have left > them. > > That is the main reason you don't see what happened right after the > CGIs rammed into the South Tower. They didn't want you to know how > the holes were really made. DUH > > >>>>> And even everything done in the two days after 9/11 are consistent >>>>> with people that were behind 9/11. >>>> >>>> That's righ. What people? The brave Americans who risked, and >>>> sometimes gave their lives, to help those who were in distress? If >>>> those are whom you are referring to, you truly are a vile piece of >>>> shit. >>> >>> All you have proven in you never tried to figure out what happened >>> on 9/11 yourself. You let mainstream media tell you everything even >>> though they do not explain anything. Like why didn't they >>> investigate the alleged hijackers after 9/11 and see how many were >>> still living? Instead they made the accused come forward and try to >>> get their names removed from the list of 19 patsies. BTW that is >>> why the pilot of the alleged Flight 77 had to be changed to a rookie >>> because the person they originally say piloted the plane was still >>> living. <G> >>> >>> The 9/11 Commission was the biggest joke on mankind next to the >>> Warren Commission. >> >> You forgot to mention the kook sites you keep thinking have anything >> worth while. If they had any kind of evidence, there would be every >> landshark in the US looking for a piece of that pie. > > You are the kook that can not even explain where the Twin Towers went > or why they couldn't crush what was below them but they were supposed > to have crushed WTC3? Nope, that doesn't make sense but underground > MRR nukes make sense and explain why Ground Zero was called Ground > Zero. You're the one making all the claims woithout the backing of anything but the same kooky website. In case you missed it, you're the one who has the burden of proof. >> >> Damn, you are thicker than a whale sandwich. > > You haven't done a fcuking thing. All you do is wave your hands in > the air without saying anything to support the official bullshit told > about 9/11. I don't have to support anything. You're the one crying how it's all a lie and the kooksite has the TRVTH. > Fact is the remains of the Twin Towers resemble a place where nuclear > devices were detonated and the way the jets flew into the Twin Towers > resemble CGIs and both those are easy to prove for yourself if you > just look at the evidence. "Fact is" and "look like" as well as "resemble" don't actually belong in the same sentence. Nice try but it's another epic FAIL. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "I wrote a REFERENCED researched book, that names everyone who's ideas are integrated within it. Soon my warchest will be large ebough to to sue the fuck out of you for your lible and defamation, and when that days comes you can be sure I will publish IT everywhere as well." - Edmo This signature was made by SigChanger. You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 15:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n3fnch$m8m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #536248 |
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in > news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> >> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>> building was >>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>> propaganda about >>>>> a 757. >>>>> >>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>> >>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>> with a ship >>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>> CGIs and >>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>> the gash in >>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was self >>>>> destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of passenger >>>>> interference. >>>>> >>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after all, >>>>> it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a single >>>>> airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner full of >>>>> scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented Muslim >>>>> fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah Fuckbar", you >>>>> demented asshole troll. >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings so >>>> you can >>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they turned >>>> bogus in flight. >>>> >>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>> had the >>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>> the ground >>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>> >>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>> if two >>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily recreated >>>> by 3D >>>> software? >>>> >>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>> and that >>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>> of the >>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>> vaporized >>>> building. See: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you and >>>> your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>> >>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber than >>> Michael Jackson fans. >> >> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >> DUH. > > Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I would > indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to have > forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. > > For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they > have to all be wrong to fit your claims. > > A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your > CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe > other than provable facts? > >> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains of >> the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a vaporized >> building. >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to > mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but > trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources is > enough to show everyone your agenda. > >> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies with >> the 9/11 BULLSHIT. > > With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't a > Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts of > those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of this > to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you a > traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, > murderer? HEY it's you G.W. well,... we still aren't on your side,....even though we don't support the terrorists you texass country bumkin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 22:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA561B13888C5Fstillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #536385 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in news:n3fnch$m8m$1@dont-email.me: > > > Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >> >>> >>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>> building was >>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>> a 757. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>> >>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>>> with a ship >>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>>> CGIs and >>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>>> the gash in >>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after >>>>>> all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a >>>>>> single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner >>>>>> full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented >>>>>> Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah >>>>>> Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>> so you can >>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>> >>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>>> had the >>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>>> the ground >>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>> >>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>>> if two >>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>> software? >>>>> >>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>>> and that >>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>>> of the >>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>> vaporized >>>>> building. See: >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you >>>>> and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>> >>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>> >>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >>> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >>> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >>> DUH. >> >> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to >> have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. >> >> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they >> have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >> >> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your >> CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe >> other than provable facts? >> >>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >>> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains >>> of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a >>> vaporized building. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to >> mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >> >>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >> >> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't >> a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts >> of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of >> this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you >> a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, >> murderer? > > > > HEY it's you G.W. Who? > well,... we still aren't on your side,....even > though we don't support the terrorists you texass country bumkin. Sorry, I grew up in a large city. You lose again, paranoid liar. -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "I have a "bit of education", that's why I don't fall for spinic crap like yours." - Ed showing off his education but not his diplomas.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-30 03:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g22o5bpcicvscncjvi35mtbnqr56poppi6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #536396 |
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:25:22 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote: >"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in >news:n3fnch$m8m$1@dont-email.me: > >> >> >> Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in >>> news:l7Sdnd0Ljpk9kMfLnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@giganews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote in message >>>> news:XnsA5607D0EC22D3stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18... >>>>> Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:2IKdnUwOz7NjSsTLnZ2dnUVZ5qqdnZ2d@giganews.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>> news:7LWdnZb0TKkYVsTLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:a5mdnXk2HJHEAcXLnZ2dnUVZ5qednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>> "Rocky" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:aP2dnacayY9e_cXLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting that even people at the Pentagon didn't believe the >>>>>>> building was >>>>>>> rammed by a 757 until the media started all sorts of bogus >>>>>>> propaganda about >>>>>>> a 757. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 >>>>>>> NBC 09.38-09.40 AM" >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BbNmID2sNM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And why is it that the damage done to the Pentagon is consistent >>>>>>> with a ship >>>>>>> sinking missile, the damage to the Twin Towers is consistent with >>>>>>> CGIs and >>>>>>> the damage done at Pranksville, PA is consistent with BS because >>>>>>> the gash in >>>>>>> the ground was there before 9/11? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *** Let's see here, Wockie ... four passenger jets were hi-jacked >>>>>>> at Boston's Logan airport. >>>>>>> Two were crashed into the twin towers, as planned. >>>>>>> Number three was crashed into the Pentagon, as planned >>>>>>> The fourth was supposed to crash into the White House, but was >>>>>>> self destructed into the Pennsylvania country side because of >>>>>>> passenger interference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course you and your brainless minions reject these facts. So, >>>>>>> tell us then where did the 4 high-jacked planes land ??? after >>>>>>> all, it had to be somewhere in a 3000 mile radius and not a >>>>>>> single airport reported the unscheduled landing of an airliner >>>>>>> full of scared shitless passengers and a compliment of demented >>>>>>> Muslim fanatics, wielding box-cutters and yelling "Allah >>>>>>> Fuckbar", you demented asshole troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because NORAD used their ability to fake radar readings >>>>>> so you can >>>>>> scratch all four of those jets off your list because they were >>>>>> either completely bogus as in Flight 11 and Flight 77 or they >>>>>> turned bogus in flight. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW Cleveland reported Flight 93 landed there and they might have >>>>>> had the >>>>>> real Flight 93 land there too because it certainly didn't land in >>>>>> Pranksville, PA as proven by Google Earth and that those marks in >>>>>> the ground >>>>>> were there pre 9/11. >>>>>> >>>>>> And if a 757 landed at the Pentagon where did the remains go? And >>>>>> if two >>>>>> jets really flew into the Twin Towers why are they easily >>>>>> recreated by 3D >>>>>> software? >>>>>> >>>>>> And do not forget the biggest give away that 9/11 was a bad movie >>>>>> and that >>>>>> is when they claimed the Twin Towers collapsed because the remains >>>>>> of the >>>>>> Twin Towers are not consistent with a collapsed building but a >>>>>> vaporized >>>>>> building. See: >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *** Sorry to have yanked you chain again, Wockie ... but I think >>>>>> most of us saw the collapse of both towers, live, on TV. But once >>>>>> again, those are irrefutable facts, which raises havoc among you >>>>>> and your mentally challenged conspiracy peers. >>>>> >>>>> I saw it live on *local* TV, so I'm dying to hear this from both >>>>> Rocky and the Queen of Evasion AKA Bast. These kooks are dumber >>>>> than Michael Jackson fans. >>>> >>>> BULLSHIT. There is no live TV anywhere because they always have to >>>> have a few seconds delay and in the case of 9/11 it was a 17 second >>>> delay and that gave them plenty of time to add CGIs to their videos. >>>> DUH. >>> >>> Aside from WNEW and other radio stations located in Manhattan, I >>> would indeed suggest that there are indeed live stations. You seem to >>> have forgotten about the public access channels and weather stations. >>> >>> For that matter, there are also satellite and radar images. But they >>> have to all be wrong to fit your claims. >>> >>> A 17 second delay from a local station? That's 7 seconds, Rocky. Your >>> CGI claim is even more ludicrous. Is there anything you don't believe >>> other than provable facts? >>> >>>> Don't forget the two jets in Nuke York City can be easily reproduced >>>> with 3D software including the "Disappearing Wing" and the remains >>>> of the Twin Towers do not resemble a collapsed building but a >>>> vaporized building. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> I really don't know how you could confuse software that's designed to >>> mimic actual physical occurrances with what actually happens but >>> trotting out a completely discredited website with no other sources >>> is enough to show everyone your agenda. >>> >>>> The kooks are the ones that never looked for any inconsistencies >>>> with the 9/11 BULLSHIT. >>> >>> With so many people, including many who would love to prove it wasn't >>> a Gubmint plot, who have pored over this and the exceptonal efforts >>> of those who exposed the culprits, I find your repeated belittling of >>> this to be something a terrorist and propagandist would try. Are you >>> a traitor and a terrorist, Rocky? Which cell are you attached to, >>> murderer? >> >> >> >> HEY it's you G.W. > >Who? > >> well,... we still aren't on your side,....even >> though we don't support the terrorists you texass country bumkin. > >Sorry, I grew up in a large city. You lose again, paranoid liar. Bast keeps spiraling down further into complete insanity. She honestly cannot tell the difference between reality and the world she's created with Rocky and the rest of the Troofers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web