Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #532655 > unrolled thread

Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre

Started byYousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
First post2015-11-13 01:34 -0500
Last post2015-11-13 11:16 -0800
Articles 14 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-13 01:34 -0500
    Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 03:51 -0800
      Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:32 -0600
        Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:27 -0800
          Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 10:31 -0600
    Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 10:46 -0800
      Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:14 -0800
        Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-13 11:29 -0800
        Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 14:55 -0600
          Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 16:20 -0800
            Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 17:05 -0800
            Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 04:49 +0000
              Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 11:34 -0800
      Re: Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-11-13 11:16 -0800

#532655 — Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre

FromYousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
Date2015-11-13 01:34 -0500
SubjectOldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre
Message-ID<hqKdnQkG3cn3GdjLnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com>
"Astronomers have discovered the oldest stars ever seen, dating from 
before the Milky Way Galaxy formed, when the universe was just 300 
million years old."

Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre | Astronomy Now
https://astronomynow.com/2015/11/12/oldest-stars-ever-seen-found-near-milky-way-centre/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#532695

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 03:51 -0800
Message-ID<998cca22-8315-451b-be76-8da4d5704833@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532655
Old stars end up near the center, are
drawn in and shredded, make jets
that become new stars, which move
out along the star arm to an epiphany,
and then sink back to the center.
It's part of a newly-observed CYCLE.

They're NOT "from the beginning of
the Universe". 
Children!! So sweet and innocent!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532714

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 08:32 -0600
Message-ID<F6-dnWaU8uQYadjLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#532695
On 11/13/15 5:51 AM, john wrote:
> Old stars end up near the center, are drawn in and shredded, make
> jets that become new stars, which move out along the star arm to an
> epiphany, and then sink back to the center. It's part of a
> newly-observed CYCLE.


               ##                                      #
               ##                                      #
               #########################################
               #########################################
               ##                                 ######
               ##                             ##########
                                            ############
                                         ##############
                                       #############
                                    #############
                                ##############
                              #############
                           ##############
                         #############
                      ##############
                  #############                        #
                #############                          #
               #########################################
               #########################################
                                                       #

                       ########
                    ###############
                  ##################
                 #####################
                ####               ####
                ##                   ##
               ##                     ##
               ##                     ##
               ##                    ###
                ##                   ##
                ####               ####
                 #####################
                  ##################
                    ###############
                       ########


See: http://sci.physics.narkive.com

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532736

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 08:27 -0800
Message-ID<6bb1f886-45d7-4238-ba3a-bb7ac6d218fd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532714
Too cryptic for me, Sam.
Cool link, though

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532739

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 10:31 -0600
Message-ID<yaudndaW78zUjdvLnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#532736
On 11/13/15 10:27 AM, john wrote:
> Too cryptic for me, Sam.
> Cool link, though
>

   Glad you liked the link, john.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532784

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 10:46 -0800
Message-ID<1efe9919-bf89-4634-a17d-0b61882df2ce@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532655
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 10:34:21 PM UTC-8, Yousuf Khan wrote:
> "Astronomers have discovered the oldest stars ever seen, dating from 
> before the Milky Way Galaxy formed, when the universe was just 300 
> million years old."
> 
> Oldest stars ever seen found near Milky Way centre | Astronomy Now
> https://astronomynow.com/2015/11/12/oldest-stars-ever-seen-found-near-milky-way-centre/

We have to ask this "How long did all that hydrogen and helium take to make the first stars? Was there any space dust to speed up the force of gravity? Was there powerful space waves from explosions ? that also gets things going for star birth. In this early time its said."ALL WAS SO VERY DENSE" That to me needs lots of answers too. I'm sure imperial thinkers can fudge that.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532790

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 11:14 -0800
Message-ID<3621bbf5-26fc-4751-a9e3-71517e1aaf0e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532784
What we now observe is that
galactic centers (aka BHs) CREATE
stars- not the other way around.
So.....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532796

Frompnalsing@gmail.com
Date2015-11-13 11:29 -0800
Message-ID<d53859ae-a879-4509-bf18-fd5453668e70@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532790
On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 11:14:55 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> What we now observe is that
> galactic centers (aka BHs) CREATE
> stars- not the other way around.
> So.....

No, no evidence of that at all...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532816

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 14:55 -0600
Message-ID<qNOdnRZ18rXU09vLnZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#532790
On 11/13/15 1:14 PM, john wrote:
> What we now observe is that
> galactic centers (aka BHs) CREATE
> stars- not the other way around.
> So.....
>

   No!

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532904

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 16:20 -0800
Message-ID<5eb7388b-4675-41e6-92fa-ec9e68cc5a7d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532816
Yes.
http://phys.org/news/2015-08-thickets-stars-elliptical-galaxies.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532926

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 17:05 -0800
Message-ID<0f3eb6e8-a991-424c-bc14-268d9f9e3c14@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532904
Don't you read your own posts, Sam?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532976

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-11-14 04:49 +0000
Message-ID<n26eg1$pd3$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#532904
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Yes.
>http://phys.org/news/2015-08-thickets-stars-elliptical-galaxies.html

You do realize that that article describes how the black hole jets _slows_
star formation in a negative feedback loop, and the stars that are formed
are formed from surrounding gas, not from the jets themselves.

> Don't you read your own posts, Sam?

Don't you read the very articles you reference, John?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#533073

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-14 11:34 -0800
Message-ID<38f26d56-8d90-4936-9d93-6fa57ea0f84e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#532976
No jets, no stars.
The idiotic BB bullshit says
Black Holes form when large numbers
of stars are sucked together and
crushed by their own Gravity.
OBSERVATION shows BHs form
jets when OLD stars are shredded and the
result, when they interact
with the hot gases near the
center (where do they come
from, Michael?), is NEW stars.

Stars form because of BHs, NOT the
other way around.
It's a CYCLE, Michael.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#532792

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2015-11-13 11:16 -0800
Message-ID<n25cpj$qdl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#532784
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> The Criminal Swine Glazier "reber g=emc^2" 
wrote:
I'm an imperial Stinkers, Faceshitter, Jewish  Jailbird & Transvestite
Glazier, the Cretin, who can fudge that, with TreBert's daily Glazierola 
....
>
for which hanson, who "made Swine Glazier famous", so Glazier said,
will, later on today, administer with care and love badly needed
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier> after every post of
Full-Swine Glazier's, which will contain the following elements:
>
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> :B::ert Glazier, the Swine,
who is an embarrassment to every Jew, everywhere, & is a
Hate filled War monger, Jewish Jailbird, Face-shitter and
Graveyard Vandal, Thief, Racist, Bigot & Criminal Communist
Traitor Sympathizer "reber g=emc^2" who introduces himself
as/with
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the  Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's
:B:: face to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" and I bought a 357 magnum
:B:: for death threats on Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
about which ....
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
"Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:

"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot"....  .... about which....
>
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
Glazier, "Its a shame"  that your science is far worse
than the man's on the street.
Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave .
reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me.
reber, you don't believe in science.
Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__.
Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!..
>
Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Give up and kill yourself.
>
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
>
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy
or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way.
>
benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is!
Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your  IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
...  how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's
Parking Lot? .....    ....  What went wrong, Glazier?
>
Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies?
Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the
ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
>
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
  widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert.
>
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
movement, actually saying that  __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"...
>
hanson wrote:
So, Glazier you Transie-Swine, do know that as soon as you
have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR
posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and
show your legacy is because:
>
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
>
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is because of hanson that Web searches will shows for:
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising
cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web