Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531457 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 18:27 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 05:17 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 188 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:24 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 22:32 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:43 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:25 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:38 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 06:57 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:50 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:19 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:41 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 23:33 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 22:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 06:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 06:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 17:43 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:14 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:52 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:08 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 06:53 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:26 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 12:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:42 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 10:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:13 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:31 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:44 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:04 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 15:49 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 10:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 17:46 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:06 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 19:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 00:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 04:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 21:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:49 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 21:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:27 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:27 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 10:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 20:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 17:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:42 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 16:41 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-11 00:52 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-11 02:56 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:55 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:39 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:19 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 21:24 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:11 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 04:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:15 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:31 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 13:38 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 20:52 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 08:29 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 14:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 09:56 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 13:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:05 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:00 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:10 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 11:34 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:18 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:23 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 12:04 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 13:12 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-11 15:26 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 20:30 +0000
The Jackass, aka Turdv, braying away. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 16:41 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 18:15 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:37 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:46 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:07 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 06:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 14:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 13:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Wipe A Rat" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-11-09 19:44 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:17 +0000
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A1C3B.63A0D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532080 |
On 11/11/15, 7:49 AM, in article n1vkdr$5q0$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >>>> Adobe software. >>> >>> Actually, no >> >> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >> >> > A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. > > Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb At one point Adobe Flash was on something like 95% of all desktop computers. Might have gone down by now. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 23:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n232cs$sid$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532346 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 11/11/15, 7:49 AM, in article n1vkdr$5q0$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >>>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations >>>>> using Adobe software. >>>> >>>> Actually, no >>> >>> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >>> >>> >> A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. >> >> Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb > > At one point Adobe Flash was on something like 95% of all desktop > computers. Might have gone down by now. > Idiot. Since when has that program enabled users to *create* "professional presentations"? It is for *displaying* them, you cretinous lying dimbulb The Adobe tool to create flash files costs real hefty dollars And you lunatic clown claim to know /anything at all/ about IT? How delusional are you? Have your meds run out this early again?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A6085.63AB9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532489 |
On 11/12/15, 3:06 PM, in article n232cs$sid$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 11/11/15, 7:49 AM, in article n1vkdr$5q0$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>>>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations >>>>>> using Adobe software. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, no >>>> >>>> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >>>> >>>> >>> A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. >>> >>> Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb >> >> At one point Adobe Flash was on something like 95% of all desktop >> computers. Might have gone down by now. >> > > Idiot. The word you worked hard to make synonymous with your own name. And below you go off topic again... and pretend things are in contention when nobody suggested they were. > Since when has that program enabled users to *create* "professional > presentations"? It is for *displaying* them, you cretinous lying dimbulb > > The Adobe tool to create flash files costs real hefty dollars > > And you lunatic clown claim to know /anything at all/ about IT? How > delusional are you? Have your meds run out this early again? > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.23.56.17@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531920 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:25:35 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > > While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using > Adobe software. > After you leave the gleaming conference room, take a peek in the back office. There you will discover paper file cabinets and even fax machines! All the modern trappings of the digital age, such as electronic files, digital signatures, and public keys, are completely absent. The average corporate worker still exists within the technological stone age and employs totally obsolescent tools. The do-it-all GUI is, in large measure, responsible for this lamentable state of affairs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 19:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1gsf5hr797dt5$.3sa1cwx3pl09.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #531940 |
On 10 Nov 2015 23:56:18 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:25:35 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >> Adobe software. >> > > After you leave the gleaming conference room, take a peek in the back > office. > > There you will discover paper file cabinets and even fax machines! > All the modern trappings of the digital age, such as electronic files, > digital signatures, and public keys, are completely absent. The average > corporate worker still exists within the technological stone age and > employs totally obsolescent tools. > > The do-it-all GUI is, in large measure, responsible for this lamentable > state of affairs. > Are you kidding? When was the last time you were out of your parent's basement and experienced sunlight? I work for one of the largest banks on the planet. I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you interview for a job. They would probably call the men in white coats to extract you before you harmed yourself. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.11.00.59.17@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531942 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:02:50 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > > I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you interview for a job. > They would probably call the men in white coats to extract you before you > harmed yourself. > They'd call them in for their own protection, 'cause they know I'll whip their lame corporate asses. In autumn 2012, I was hired by the Hewlett-Packard corporation as a C#/.NET programmer. It may sound paradoxical but it is perfectly true. Even though I am a staunch Linux advocate, and despise MS Windows mightily, my expertise in C#/.NET is better than all those Microsoft flunkies combined -- and they knew it. During the interview process I blew 'em all way. (They're all fluff balls anyway.) Shortly thereafter, however, I resigned. Why? In the first place, my colleagues were all Microsoft idiots, steeped in the principles of Object Oriented programming but completely ignorant of basic machine principles. Like all OO morons, they gladly rely on the processor power and abundant memory to make up for all of their conceptual shortfalls. (Not to mention that they are all obsessed and enslaved by the web interface when a direct link between winforms, ala WCF, would be much preferable.) Secondly, and most important, is the behavior of Microsoft itself. The .NET framework, or at least some parts of it, are updated with new editions as frequently as every 60 days. This rapid release cycle is nothing short of insanity and HP's programmers are expected to keep current and to always stay on top of the latest changes. Of course this means devoting a lot of ones free time to studying the latest manuals and other documentation as well as exploring code examples. After carefully assessing this situation, I realized that between regular programming duties and self-imposed study sessions I would barely have enough free time left over for a shower, shave, and a shit. Therefore, I quit. Microsoft has all those programming lackeys by the balls. Companies are so entrenched in .NET that they can never escape into something else. The hectic release cycle, with its concomitant certifications, is a deliberate tactic by Microsoft to capture the soul and spirit of programmers, and their corporate overlords, everywhere. Linux embraces the venerable C language (and its OO offspring C++). These fine and versatile languages are updated once every 10 years, and that's how it should be. Microsoft, and its insidious C#/.NET, can kiss my shit-bespattered ass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 19:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n1u6i5$l71$5@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #531961 |
On 11/10/2015 6:59 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:02:50 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you interview for a job. >> They would probably call the men in white coats to extract you before you >> harmed yourself. >> > > They'd call them in for their own protection, 'cause they know I'll > whip their lame corporate asses. > > In autumn 2012, I was hired by the Hewlett-Packard corporation as > a C#/.NET programmer. It may sound paradoxical but it is perfectly > true. Even though I am a staunch Linux advocate, and despise MS > Windows mightily, my expertise in C#/.NET is better than all those > Microsoft flunkies combined -- and they knew it. During the interview > process I blew 'em all way. (They're all fluff balls anyway.) > > Shortly thereafter, however, I resigned. Why? In the first place, > my colleagues were all Microsoft idiots, steeped in the principles > of Object Oriented programming but completely ignorant of basic machine > principles. Like all OO morons, they gladly rely on the processor power > and abundant memory to make up for all of their conceptual shortfalls. > (Not to mention that they are all obsessed and enslaved by the web interface > when a direct link between winforms, ala WCF, would be much preferable.) > > Secondly, and most important, is the behavior of Microsoft itself. The > .NET framework, or at least some parts of it, are updated with new editions > as frequently as every 60 days. This rapid release cycle is nothing short > of insanity and HP's programmers are expected to keep current and to always > stay on top of the latest changes. Of course this means devoting a lot > of ones free time to studying the latest manuals and other documentation > as well as exploring code examples. After carefully assessing this > situation, I realized that between regular programming duties and > self-imposed study sessions I would barely have enough free time left > over for a shower, shave, and a shit. Therefore, I quit. > > Microsoft has all those programming lackeys by the balls. Companies > are so entrenched in .NET that they can never escape into something > else. The hectic release cycle, with its concomitant certifications, > is a deliberate tactic by Microsoft to capture the soul and spirit > of programmers, and their corporate overlords, everywhere. > > Linux embraces the venerable C language (and its OO offspring C++). > These fine and versatile languages are updated once every 10 years, > and that's how it should be. > > Microsoft, and its insidious C#/.NET, can kiss my shit-bespattered ass. > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106856/ Classic case. Somebody call the cops. This guy's gonna be in the news. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 04:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.11.04.18.45@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531982 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:44:39 -0600, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106856/ > > Classic case. Somebody call the cops. This guy's gonna be in the news. > Is this, Oddball, the prime example of your humanistic scholarship? Pathetic. Unfortunately, Oddball, I cannot rebut with another citation from that Hollywood fare. I have not partaken of a popular movie since I was about 10 years old -- and only then because I could not know any better. Thus my knowledge of that despicable genera is virtually non-existent. However, allow me, in response, to refer you to an ancient Greek drama by Euripides called "The Bacchae." You may find that the character of Pentheus therein is of particular kinship. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Don't spill your popcorn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 21:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1dutzkis77mi3.1lu4a9zq79c81.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #531961 |
On 11 Nov 2015 00:59:13 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:02:50 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you interview for a job. >> They would probably call the men in white coats to extract you before you >> harmed yourself. >> > > They'd call them in for their own protection, 'cause they know I'll > whip their lame corporate asses. > > In autumn 2012, I was hired by the Hewlett-Packard corporation as > a C#/.NET programmer. It may sound paradoxical but it is perfectly > true. Even though I am a staunch Linux advocate, and despise MS > Windows mightily, my expertise in C#/.NET is better than all those > Microsoft flunkies combined -- and they knew it. During the interview > process I blew 'em all way. (They're all fluff balls anyway.) > > Shortly thereafter, however, I resigned. Why? In the first place, > my colleagues were all Microsoft idiots, steeped in the principles > of Object Oriented programming but completely ignorant of basic machine > principles. Like all OO morons, they gladly rely on the processor power > and abundant memory to make up for all of their conceptual shortfalls. > (Not to mention that they are all obsessed and enslaved by the web interface > when a direct link between winforms, ala WCF, would be much preferable.) > > Secondly, and most important, is the behavior of Microsoft itself. The > .NET framework, or at least some parts of it, are updated with new editions > as frequently as every 60 days. This rapid release cycle is nothing short > of insanity and HP's programmers are expected to keep current and to always > stay on top of the latest changes. Of course this means devoting a lot > of ones free time to studying the latest manuals and other documentation > as well as exploring code examples. After carefully assessing this > situation, I realized that between regular programming duties and > self-imposed study sessions I would barely have enough free time left > over for a shower, shave, and a shit. Therefore, I quit. > > Microsoft has all those programming lackeys by the balls. Companies > are so entrenched in .NET that they can never escape into something > else. The hectic release cycle, with its concomitant certifications, > is a deliberate tactic by Microsoft to capture the soul and spirit > of programmers, and their corporate overlords, everywhere. > > Linux embraces the venerable C language (and its OO offspring C++). > These fine and versatile languages are updated once every 10 years, > and that's how it should be. > > Microsoft, and its insidious C#/.NET, can kiss my shit-bespattered ass. So you were unable to make your mark. It happens. Only the cream of the crop rises to the top. If that's not you, so be it. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.11.02.49.40@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531989 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:02:32 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > > Only the cream of the crop rises to the top. > What a fool. But I don't rely on subjective assessments. For me, there is only objective evidence. If we were to go, right this minute, and randomly select professionals of any stripe, pull them off the job, and subject them to an unannounced, rigorous examination of their supposed skills, the vast majority of them would fail miserably. (And that would include you as well.) As one chief justice of the US Supreme Court once remarked, half of the trial lawyers are totally incompetent. That is quite true, but the figure is doubtless greater than 50%, and the same applies across all other professional fields. The corporate world is full of blatant incompetency. You may not recognize it because you yourself share the trait. It only needs to provide a semblance of organization and cohesion in order to pass. If the "cream of the crop" were to show up at the corporate doorstep, he would be unrecognizable to the idiots who thrive inside.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 21:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1a9v45098w3o9$.1f067gnataf68$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532002 |
On 11 Nov 2015 02:49:41 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:02:32 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> Only the cream of the crop rises to the top. >> > > What a fool. I'm making $270k a year plus a bonus of at least 15 percent. And you? > But I don't rely on subjective assessments. For me, there is only > objective evidence. I rely on money in my pocket. And you? -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 03:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.11.03.24.38@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #532003 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:57:28 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > > I'm making $270k a year plus a bonus of at least 15 percent. > You are fortunate enough to be living during a period of cultural decline when such things are all that matter. Within any truly advanced civilization, you would be less than a churl. But any petty thief could do a lot better than that nowadays, and the job is not so fscking boring.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 12:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn49miq.jqf.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #532008 |
On 2015-11-11, Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:57:28 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm making $270k a year plus a bonus of at least 15 percent.
>>
>
> You are fortunate enough to be living during a period of cultural
> decline when such things are all that matter.
No. I think he's just full of shit. He strikes me as someone that's
completely unaware of the implications of making that kind of W-2 salary.
[deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 07:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1vcdt$79c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531961 |
"Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message news:pan.2015.11.11.00.59.17@localhost.localdomain... > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:02:50 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you interview for a job. >> They would probably call the men in white coats to extract you before you >> harmed yourself. >> > > They'd call them in for their own protection, 'cause they know I'll > whip their lame corporate asses. > > In autumn 2012, I was hired by the Hewlett-Packard corporation as > a C#/.NET programmer. It may sound paradoxical but it is perfectly > true. Even though I am a staunch Linux advocate, and despise MS > Windows mightily, my expertise in C#/.NET is better than all those > Microsoft flunkies combined -- and they knew it. During the interview > process I blew 'em all way. (They're all fluff balls anyway.) > > Shortly thereafter, however, I resigned.... Where "resigned" is in the eye of the beholder. Here's what really happened - After working there a month you made it clear that you know more about C#.NET and the product than all of those "Microsoft flunkies" that worked there for years. The other people couldn't stand working with blowhard who knows nothing about everything. So "shortly thereafter" your boss (that's 20+ years younger than you) called you into his office. He told you that effective immediately, you were "resigned". -- "Internally, Microsoft still uses the former 8.3 filename notation because nothing else will work. The more "liberal" file naming convention is just a cosmetic cover." Only in the mind of Fabian Russell Nov 9, 2015 - <pan.2015.11.09.18.05.31@localhost.localdomain>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dafcu1FljvbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #531919 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > > > >> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >> you think it is now? >> >> > It's still as important as ever. > > You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest > fashion and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. > > But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. > > A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can > accommodate the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable > format. Buts tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and > therefore will appeal to all the software fops. > > The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. > You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. IOW, so you sit in your mom's basement and between jerk-off sessions, think if convoluted ways to play with your toy computer. Thanks for the clarification. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1c2l0zycrgezc.1un10relpzigg.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #531923 |
On 10 Nov 2015 23:29:05 GMT, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> >> >> >>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >>> you think it is now? >>> >>> >> It's still as important as ever. >> >> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest >> fashion and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >> >> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >> >> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >> accommodate the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable >> format. Buts tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and >> therefore will appeal to all the software fops. >> >> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. > > IOW, so you sit in your mom's basement and between jerk-off sessions, > think if convoluted ways to play with your toy computer. Thanks for the > clarification. This Fabian is either the best troll to hit COLA in years or he really believes the spewage he is spouting. At the moment, I vote for the latter because I have met others like him. They are literally living in a time warp circa 1970. Either way, he's very entertaining. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1tqt5$jm7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531893 |
Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:57 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >>> On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. >>> >> Sure it is, uh-huh. >> > > Yes, it likely wood. > > On MS Windows, the only accessible file formats are "seekable" formats, > which means that the whole file must first be read into memory before > any processing can take place. > > On Linux, the PAM format can be processed via a pipeline. This could > not happen on MS Windows. This is wrong
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Feidnam65-RJ4N_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531906 |
On 11/10/15 15:27, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Fabian Russell wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:57 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>>> >>>> On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. >>>> >>> Sure it is, uh-huh. >>> >> >> Yes, it likely wood. >> >> On MS Windows, the only accessible file formats are "seekable" formats, >> which means that the whole file must first be read into memory before >> any processing can take place. >> >> On Linux, the PAM format can be processed via a pipeline. This could >> not happen on MS Windows. > > This is wrong Of course it is... he's trolling. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Feidna665-Qc4N_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531893 |
On 11/10/15 15:06, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:57 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >>> On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. >>> >> Sure it is, uh-huh. >> > > Yes, it likely wood. > It isn't impossible. > On MS Windows, the only accessible file formats are "seekable" formats, > which means that the whole file must first be read into memory before > any processing can take place. > > On Linux, the PAM format can be processed via a pipeline. This could > not happen on MS Windows. > Surely you jest. And of course it can be done on windows, just does it differently than you think it would otherwise. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <IL6dnSNMe4wb3N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531711 |
On 11/09/15 22:06, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:49:28 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>>
>> So why not show how you would do the tasks I have shown you...
>>
>
> Here is a different task.
>
> I go out with my digital SLR and shoot some pictures. The RAW images
> are saved to a camera card.
>
> I want to process these RAW files in a completely automated fashion,
> with no user intervention, and with control over all fine details
> such as demosaic parameters, white balance parameters, histogram
> parmeters, etc.
>
> How can I do this?
>
> On MS Windows: Duh? What? Huh? No way, dude.
>
> On Apple: (same thing)
>
> On linux:
>
> I plug my camera card into the USB slot and run the following
> script (with a wrapper to take of misc I/O):
>
> #! /bin/bash
> # process raw (nef) completely to final JPEG in sRGB
>
> file=`basename $1`
> shrp=$2
> mults=`exiftool -s3 -WB_RBGGLevels $1`
> mul1=${mults:0:3}
> mul2=${mults:4:3}
> mul3=${mults:8:3}
> mul4=${mults:12:3}
> dcraw -v -c -D -6 -g 1 0 -W $1 | pgm_cfa_mult $mul1 $mul3 $mul2 $mul4 | pambayer -type=4 \
> | pamtopnm \
> | pnmhisteq -rmap nef_curve_lut.pgm \
> | pnmgamma 2.2> filewbg.ppm
>
> ppmtopgm filewbg.ppm> filecs.ppm
>
> bval=`pamsumm -brief -min filecs.ppm`
> wval=`pamsumm -brief -max filecs.ppm`
> pnmnorm -bvalue=$bval -wvalue=$wval -keephues filewbg.ppm | pamtotiff -none -truecolor> file.tif
>
> tifficc -v -e -n -c 2 -t 0 -w -b -i camera.icm -o sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icm file.tif filecc.tif
>
> gmic filecc.tif -resize2dx 1600,5,1 -cut 0,65535 -unsharp 0.6,$shrp,0 -cut 0,65535 -o -.pnm \
> | pnmtojpeg -quality=90 -dct=float -sample 1x1 -optimize> ${file%.nef}.jpg
>
> display ${file%.nef}.jpg&
> rm filecs.ppm filewbg.ppm file.tif filecc.tif
>
All geek toys and tinkering.
--
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web