Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #530204 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 15:02 -0600
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 21:47 +0000
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 16:34 -0600
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 22:58 +0000
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 03:22 -0600
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 11:21 -0600
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000
              Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:40 -0600
                Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 23:00 +0000
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 16:41 -0600
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 22:58 +0000
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 03:22 -0600
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 18:47 -0800
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 04:25 -0600
            well, no; and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 19:51 -0800
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 11:02 -0800
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-04 14:33 -0500
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 12:23 -0800
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Mapihal" <mapihal@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 07:52 -0800
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-04 19:52 -0500
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 22:57 +0000
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 17:14 -0600
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-04 06:33 +0000
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-04 15:11 +0000
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 11:13 -0600
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000
              Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:34 -0600
                Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
              Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-10 08:41 -0500
                Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:47 -0600
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:36 +0000
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 07:03 -0800
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-04 16:44 -0600
        belief(s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 19:15 -0800
          Re: belief(s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 18:27 -0800
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 04:24 -0600

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#530465

In article <n1dmfj$er2$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> Shoe-Chucker 2 wrote:
> > In article <KbmdnV8uFszIpaTLnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
> >> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> >>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> >>>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
> >>>>
> >>>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report,
> >>>> that will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> >>>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
> >>>> terrorist
> >>>> boogy-men.
> >>>>
> >>>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
> >>>>
> >>>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
> >>>>
> >>>> Attention:
> >>>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
> >>>> denying
> >>>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can
> >>>> provide.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> >>>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> >>>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> >>>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
> >>>
> >>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war
> >>> on terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the
> >>> bogus jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks
> >>> exactly like a
> >>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
> >>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>>
> >>> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> >>> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged
> >>> Event "
> >>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
> >>>
> >>> Rocky
> >>
> >> Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes"
> >> can vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
> >>
> >> ===========================
> >>
> >> ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story
> >> building will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the
> >> North Tower or anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
> >>
> >> What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10
> >> story building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
> >>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>
> >> Rocky
> >
> > When all was said and done. More was said than done, in finding the
> > Truth.
> > But, there are two things that i've noticed.
> > The system is quite vigilant when it comes to attacking anyone who asks
> > questions about What really happened. Oh, they call the "truthers" all
> > kinds of things. but. you just know they have quite a House o Cards to
> > maintain. If the truth ever came out. A quite large ball of wax will
> > melt. Wars and the attacks on your privacy.
> > And the cover-ups.
> > visit;  www.ae911truth.org/ for more.
> > or
> > Just Google; 9/11 Truth.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yes I agree absolutely.

Of course. You know, kOOks of a feather rave together.

> That was why I posted this.
> I had to prove something to a friend

You've proven something, but not what you think.

> 
> All you need is 9/11 in the subject line for the mind-controled zombi's to 
> swoop in to  save the world from someone asking questions.

In the real world, it's actually goofing on kOOks.

> ....Discussion of 9/11 is VERBOTEN under pain of DEATH, in new world order 
> AMERIKA.

Yet you and the other Troofer morons seem to be alive and well.

> 
> And no one even seemed to notice that the link had nothing to do with 9/11 
> at all.
> So that tells you how much anyone responding is willing to consider, no 
> matter what proof is provided. 

If you ever posted any real proof, you might be taken seriously, but 
you, and no other Troofer/kOOktard has ever done so.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530249

On 03/11/2015 21:02, Rocky wrote:
> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
>> will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
>> terrorist
>> boogy-men.
>>
>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>>
>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>>
>> Attention:
>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
>> denying
>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can provide.
>>
>>
>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
>
> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a
> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can 
compare the events.

But you wont answer because you are to scared.

> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event"
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530259

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
> On 03/11/2015 21:02, Rocky wrote:
>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
>>> will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
>>> terrorist
>>> boogy-men.
>>>
>>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>>>
>>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>>>
>>> Attention:
>>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
>>> denying
>>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can 
>>> provide.
>>>
>>>
>>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
>>
>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
>> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly 
>> like a
>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>
> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can 
> compare the events.

No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then you 
will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Don't forget that the Willis Tower used to be called the Sears Tower and 
because the terrorist had codes to our nukes it was evacuated on 9/11 too.

As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.

"Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event"
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530290

On 03/11/2015 23:14, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 03/11/2015 21:02, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
>>>> will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>>>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
>>>> terrorist
>>>> boogy-men.
>>>>
>>>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>>>>
>>>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>>>>
>>>> Attention:
>>>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
>>>> denying
>>>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can
>>>> provide.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>>>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>>>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>>>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
>>>
>>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
>>> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
>>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly
>>> like a
>>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>
>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>> compare the events.
>
> No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then you
> will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Don't forget that the Willis Tower used to be called the Sears Tower and
> because the terrorist had codes to our nukes it was evacuated on 9/11 too.
>
> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
>
> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event"
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>
> Rocky
>
>

So you can't provide an example, glad we've cleared that up.

As there is no example of a nuclear demolition, then your claim of 
'being consistent with' fails.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530335

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...

>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can 
>> compare the events.

>No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then you 
>will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH

He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.

I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear demolition
that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself whether 9/11
looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.

So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?

(this is a rhetorical question, of course. We all know the answer)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531438

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n1d766$gne$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>
>>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>>> compare the events.
>
>>No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then you
>>will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
>
> He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
> that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
> thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.
>
> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear demolition
> that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself whether 9/11
> looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>
> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?

I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit 
buildings and that is they fall down and all you did was say the jets that 
hit the Twin Towers were flying faster than their maximum airspeed at sea 
level so they could do anything they wanted to do.  (SIC)

I don't buy your bullshit about why the jets that rammed the Twin Towers are 
identical to CGIs that rammed the Twin Towers and I'm certainly not ready 
for your continued bullshit about how a "global collapse" can leave multiple 
floor surviving corners.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531507

On 09/11/2015 17:13, Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:n1d766$gne$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>>>> compare the events.
>>
>>> No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then you
>>> will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
>>
>> He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
>> that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
>> thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.
>>
>> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear demolition
>> that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself whether 9/11
>> looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>>
>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>
> I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit
> buildings and that is they fall down and all you did was say the jets that
> hit the Twin Towers were flying faster than their maximum airspeed at sea
> level so they could do anything they wanted to do.  (SIC)
>

But you were not asked that, perhaps you have trouble reading, but here 
is the question again:-
So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?

Can you see that question, it's just above this line?

> I don't buy your bullshit about why the jets that rammed the Twin Towers are
> identical to CGIs that rammed the Twin Towers and I'm certainly not ready
> for your continued bullshit about how a "global collapse" can leave multiple
> floor surviving corners.  <G>
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
> https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531515

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n1quob$b0b$4@dont-email.me...
> On 09/11/2015 17:13, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n1d766$gne$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>>>>> compare the events.
>>>
>>>> No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then 
>>>> you
>>>> will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
>>>
>>> He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
>>> that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
>>> thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.
>>>
>>> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear demolition
>>> that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself whether 9/11
>>> looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>>>
>>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>>
>> I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit
>> buildings and that is they fall down and all you did was say the jets 
>> that
>> hit the Twin Towers were flying faster than their maximum airspeed at sea
>> level so they could do anything they wanted to do.  (SIC)
>>
>
> But you were not asked that, perhaps you have trouble reading, but here is 
> the question again:-
> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?

When one of the space shuttles blew up on launch were you asking to compare 
it to another space shuttle that blew up on launch?

All you need to know that the following is a nuclear demoltions is to know 
that nukes have limitations and are the only thing that can vaporize 
buildings before they can make it to the ground to crush what was below 
them.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

So your real question should be who had the motive to use CGIs and nukes to 
get us into war?  And the answer to that is in the following::

Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI

And the following is the first video I've seen to point the finger for The 
Great 9/11 Hoax at one of our bankers.

WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
 https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531569

On 09/11/2015 20:34, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n1quob$b0b$4@dont-email.me...
>> On 09/11/2015 17:13, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n1d766$gne$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>>>>>> compare the events.
>>>>
>>>>> No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then
>>>>> you
>>>>> will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
>>>>
>>>> He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
>>>> that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
>>>> thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.
>>>>
>>>> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear demolition
>>>> that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself whether 9/11
>>>> looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>>>>
>>>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>>>
>>> I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit
>>> buildings and that is they fall down and all you did was say the jets
>>> that
>>> hit the Twin Towers were flying faster than their maximum airspeed at sea
>>> level so they could do anything they wanted to do.  (SIC)
>>>
>>
>> But you were not asked that, perhaps you have trouble reading, but here is
>> the question again:-
>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>
> When one of the space shuttles blew up on launch were you asking to compare
> it to another space shuttle that blew up on launch?

No, you are the one telling us about comparisons, if you compare 
something with something else you should know what the something eklse is.

>
> All you need to know that the following is a nuclear demoltions is to know
> that nukes have limitations and are the only thing that can vaporize
> buildings before they can make it to the ground to crush what was below
> them.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> So your real question should be who had the motive to use CGIs and nukes to
> get us into war?  And the answer to that is in the following::
>

No the real question is the one that you have been asked many times & 
have failed to answer.

> Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI
>
> And the following is the first video I've seen to point the finger for The
> Great 9/11 Hoax at one of our bankers.
>
> WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
>   https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531753

Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 17:13, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n1d766$gne$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>>>>> compare the events.
>>>
>>>> No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked
>>>> then you will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too. DUH
>>>
>>> He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
>>> that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
>>> thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.
>>>
>>> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear
>>> demolition that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself
>>> whether 9/11 looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>>>
>>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>>
>> I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit
>> buildings and that is they fall down and all you did was say the jets
>> that hit the Twin Towers were flying faster than their maximum
>> airspeed at sea level so they could do anything they wanted to do. (SIC)
>
> But you were not asked that, perhaps you have trouble reading, but here
> is the question again:-
> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>
> Can you see that question, it's just above this line?








You have been told to look at information about "operation plowshare"
While much may be still "restricted" enough is avaiable to let you see how 
serious the government was about it, well over half a century ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5T4ko_4X6w

That was back in the 1950's when TV's were still Black and White, so imagine 
how much they improved it by 2001.










>
>> I don't buy your bullshit about why the jets that rammed the Twin
>> Towers are identical to CGIs that rammed the Twin Towers and I'm
>> certainly not ready for your continued bullshit about how a "global
>> collapse" can leave multiple floor surviving corners.  <G>
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
>> https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531983

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:41:12 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

[...]

>>>> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear
>>>> demolition that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself
>>>> whether 9/11 looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>>>>
>>>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>>>
>>> I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit
>>> buildings and that is they fall down and all you did was say the jets
>>> that hit the Twin Towers were flying faster than their maximum
>>> airspeed at sea level so they could do anything they wanted to do. (SIC)
>>
>> But you were not asked that, perhaps you have trouble reading, but here
>> is the question again:-
>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?
>>
>> Can you see that question, it's just above this line?
>
>
>
>
>
>You have been told to look at information about "operation plowshare"

     Examining the technical and economic feasibility of using nuclear
explosives for industrial applications. This, to the honest and
mentally stable mind, is not an example of a nuclear demolition we can
see to compare to the collapse on 9/11.

>While much may be still "restricted" enough is avaiable to let you see how 
>serious the government was about it, well over half a century ago
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5T4ko_4X6w
>
>That was back in the 1950's when TV's were still Black and White, so imagine 
>how much they improved it by 2001.

     And this has what to do with Rocky's LIE about nukes on 9/11? I
honestly don't see the connection.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531722

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n1d766$gne$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>news:n1be11$nj5$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>>> Still waiting for an example of a nuclear demolition so that we can
>>>> compare the events.
>>
>>>No problem.  Just wait until the Willis Tower in Chicago is nuked then you
>>>will have your proof that the Twin Towers were nuked too.  DUH
>>
>> He asked for an example of a nuclear demolition that already exists so
>> that he could compare it to 9/11, not what your overactive imagination
>> thinks may happen to the Willis Tower someday.
>>
>> I'm asking for the same thing: Show me an example of nuclear demolition
>> that 9/11 "looks exactly like", so I can see for myself whether 9/11
>> looks like a "nuclear demolition" or not.
>>
>> So why can't you show us other examples of "nuclear demolition"?

>I've already given you an example of that happens when real jets hit

Once again you're evasive and won't answer a simple question.  We're
looking for other examples of nuclear demolitions, not anything about
the jets, or the CGIs you disproved using the "Duck Test".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530333

In article <frOdne2tiPG5vKTLnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> > "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
> >
> > Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
> > will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> > You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the 
> > terrorist
> > boogy-men.
> >
> > The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
> >
> > Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
> >
> > Attention:
> > You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for 
> > denying
> > or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can provide.
> >
> >
> > *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> > It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> > something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> > of the Muslim ... grow up.
> 
> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on 
> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus 
> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a 
> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event "
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
> 
> Rocky 

Thanks Rocky for all the help.
I been having a censorship problem on Craigslist forums.
here it is.
I get this message whenever I attempt to log onto Craigslist's forums.

Safari can't verify the identity of the website;
"Forums.craigslist .org"
The certificate for this website is invalid. You might be connecting to 
a website the is pretending to be "forums.craigslist.org" which could 
put your confidential into at risk.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530419

"Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:georgewk10-177ACD.07035104112015@news.toast.net...
> In article <frOdne2tiPG5vKTLnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>> > "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>> >
>> > Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, 
>> > that
>> > will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>> > You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
>> > terrorist
>> > boogy-men.
>> >
>> > The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>> >
>> > Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>> >
>> > Attention:
>> > You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
>> > denying
>> > or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can 
>> > provide.
>> >
>> >
>> > *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>> > It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>> > something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>> > of the Muslim ... grow up.
>>
>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
>> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly 
>> like a
>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
>> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged 
>> Event "
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>>
>> Rocky
>
> Thanks Rocky for all the help.
> I been having a censorship problem on Craigslist forums.
> here it is.
> I get this message whenever I attempt to log onto Craigslist's forums.

I've seen those messages from other sites come and go.  On the sites I've 
seen them on they seem to be tied to the advertisements.

I would suggest taking the exact message you get and placing it into google 
to see what they say about it.


> Safari can't verify the identity of the website;
> "Forums.craigslist .org"
> The certificate for this website is invalid. You might be connecting to
> a website the is pretending to be "forums.craigslist.org" which could
> put your confidential into at risk.

Hmmm, I might try Safari but I expect Chrome to be spyware if not worse.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530488 — belief(s

yeah, bogus jumpers who bogusly went, splatttt

> Hmmm, I might try Safari but I expect Chrome to be spyware if not worse.
> 
> Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531104 — Re: belief(s

hey, Rocky 300?

> yeah, bogus jumpers who bogusly went, splatttt

> > Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530521

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 07:03:51 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <frOdne2tiPG5vKTLnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>> > "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>> >
>> > Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
>> > will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>> > You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the 
>> > terrorist boogy-men.
>> >
>> > The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>> >
>> > Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>> >
>> > Attention:
>> > You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for 
>> > denying
>> > or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can provide.
>> >
>> >
>> > *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>> > It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>> > something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>> > of the Muslim ... grow up.
>> 
>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on 
>> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus 
>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a 
>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>> 
>> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
>> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event "
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>> 
>> Rocky 
>
>Thanks Rocky for all the help.
>I been having a censorship problem on Craigslist forums.
>here it is.
>I get this message whenever I attempt to log onto Craigslist's forums.
>
>Safari can't verify the identity of the website;
>"Forums.craigslist .org"
>The certificate for this website is invalid. You might be connecting to 
>a website the is pretending to be "forums.craigslist.org" which could 
>put your confidential into at risk.

     This is the last time I'm going to bother. If you're still too
stump stupid to get it, there is no hope for you.
     There is something wrong with your machine. You need to take it
to a authorized service center.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web