Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #530204 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 15:02 -0600
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 21:47 +0000
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 16:34 -0600
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 22:58 +0000
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 03:22 -0600
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 11:21 -0600
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000
              Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:40 -0600
                Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 23:00 +0000
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 16:41 -0600
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 22:58 +0000
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 03:22 -0600
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 18:47 -0800
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 04:25 -0600
            well, no; and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 19:51 -0800
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 11:02 -0800
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-04 14:33 -0500
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 12:23 -0800
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Mapihal" <mapihal@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 07:52 -0800
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-04 19:52 -0500
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 22:57 +0000
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 17:14 -0600
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-04 06:33 +0000
        Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-04 15:11 +0000
          Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 11:13 -0600
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000
              Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:34 -0600
                Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
              Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-10 08:41 -0500
                Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:47 -0600
            Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:36 +0000
    Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 07:03 -0800
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-04 16:44 -0600
        belief(s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 19:15 -0800
          Re: belief(s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 18:27 -0800
      Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 04:24 -0600

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#530204 — Re: 9/11 The new truth for official fairytale believers.

"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
> will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the 
> terrorist
> boogy-men.
>
> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>
> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>
> Attention:
> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for 
> denying
> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can provide.
>
>
> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> of the Muslim ... grow up.

As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on 
terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus 
jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a 
nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
"Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event "
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#530226

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a 
>nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.

Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530241

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like 
>>a
>>nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>
> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?

ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to 
claim the following represents a collapse:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

As a matter of fact the reason why NIST never used the term "pancake" is the 
remains of the Twin Towers certainly do not represent a "pancake" collapse.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

The truth is right in front of your eyes.  CGIs flew into the Twin Towers 
because of the total lack of crash dynamics and the following is not the 
remains of any type of collapse since most the Twin Towers floated away 
instead of down to the ground.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Now who had the power and money to pull off such a stunt?

"Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event "
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY

Rockefeller GLOATS About 9/11 in 1967!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWcARHV71bU

Also see:
 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockefeller+federal+reserve

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530250

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>>jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a
>>>nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.

>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?

>ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to 

<snip evasion>

I asked for another example of a "nuclear demolition" so I could see if
Ground Zero "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition".  I did not ask
anything about pancake collapses or CGIs.

You are unable to provide another example of a "nuclear demolition".
Why is that?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530306

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 22:58:31 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>>news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>
>>>>jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like a
>>>>nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>
>>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?
>
>>ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to 
>
><snip evasion>
>
>I asked for another example of a "nuclear demolition" so I could see if
>Ground Zero "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition".  I did not ask
>anything about pancake collapses or CGIs.
>
>You are unable to provide another example of a "nuclear demolition".
>Why is that?

     Because Roger proved that there has never been a nuclear
demolition, in the context he uses, in the whole history of earth.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531440

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n1be6n$46g$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>
>>>>jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly 
>>>>like a
>>>>nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>
>>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?
>
>>ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to
>
> <snip evasion>
>
> I asked for another example of a "nuclear demolition" so I could see if
> Ground Zero "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition".  I did not ask
> anything about pancake collapses or CGIs.
>
> You are unable to provide another example of a "nuclear demolition".
> Why is that?

Because you wouldn't know a Nuclear Demolition if you saw one as proven by 
the following.  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

All you have to do is realize that even nukes have limitations.  They can 
not make a tremendous EMP from deep underground and bedrock can be used to 
determine their blast pattern.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And their blast pattern might only determine what places are vaporized and 
float away before they crush anything below.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

DAMN IT MICHAEL.  You have nothing but lies as proven by dmaster from 
alt.conspiracy because not all underground nukes make EMPs or a tremendous 
flash.  But underground nukes can make interference on AM radios as proven 
by people making movies of the Great 9/11 HOAX.

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531508

On 09/11/2015 17:21, Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:n1be6n$46g$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>
>>>>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly
>>>>> like a
>>>>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>
>>>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>>>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?
>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to
>>
>> <snip evasion>
>>
>> I asked for another example of a "nuclear demolition" so I could see if
>> Ground Zero "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition".  I did not ask
>> anything about pancake collapses or CGIs.
>>
>> You are unable to provide another example of a "nuclear demolition".
>> Why is that?
>
> Because you wouldn't know a Nuclear Demolition if you saw one as proven by
> the following.  DUH
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

So provide us the link to one, you must be able to do it, you keep 
telling us about the comparisons that you make.

Of course your lack of posting such a link will prove that you are a liar.

> All you have to do is realize that even nukes have limitations.  They can
> not make a tremendous EMP from deep underground and bedrock can be used to
> determine their blast pattern.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

But you have told us that there was an EMP, do make up your mind.

> And their blast pattern might only determine what places are vaporized and
> float away before they crush anything below.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> DAMN IT MICHAEL.  You have nothing but lies as proven by dmaster from
> alt.conspiracy because not all underground nukes make EMPs or a tremendous
> flash.  But underground nukes can make interference on AM radios as proven
> by people making movies of the Great 9/11 HOAX.
>

So these 'nukes' did not make an EMP, except for the EMP that they did 
make, what a quaint idea.

> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531516

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n1quoh$b0b$5@dont-email.me...
> On 09/11/2015 17:21, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n1be6n$46g$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>
>>>>>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly
>>>>>> like a
>>>>>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>>
>>>>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>>>>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?
>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to
>>>
>>> <snip evasion>
>>>
>>> I asked for another example of a "nuclear demolition" so I could see if
>>> Ground Zero "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition".  I did not ask
>>> anything about pancake collapses or CGIs.
>>>
>>> You are unable to provide another example of a "nuclear demolition".
>>> Why is that?
>>
>> Because you wouldn't know a Nuclear Demolition if you saw one as proven 
>> by
>> the following.  DUH
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>
> So provide us the link to one, you must be able to do it, you keep telling 
> us about the comparisons that you make.

You are asking me to provide evidence that one of our space shuttles blew up 
on launch by proving it happened before.  What an asshole you have turned 
out to be.

No, the real issue is in theory the following can be the remains of a 
Nuclear Demoltion and nothing else even comes close to explaining why so 
much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers remained standing strong and not 
crushed by 100 floors of falling debris.
  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

9/11 was CGIs and nukes and we even know who had both the motive and the 
ability to use CGIs and nukes from the following videos:

Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI

WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
 https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531568

On 09/11/2015 20:40, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n1quoh$b0b$5@dont-email.me...
>> On 09/11/2015 17:21, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n1be6n$46g$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>
>>>>>>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly
>>>>>>> like a
>>>>>>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>>>
>>>>>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>>>>>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?
>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to
>>>>
>>>> <snip evasion>
>>>>
>>>> I asked for another example of a "nuclear demolition" so I could see if
>>>> Ground Zero "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition".  I did not ask
>>>> anything about pancake collapses or CGIs.
>>>>
>>>> You are unable to provide another example of a "nuclear demolition".
>>>> Why is that?
>>>
>>> Because you wouldn't know a Nuclear Demolition if you saw one as proven
>>> by
>>> the following.  DUH
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>
>> So provide us the link to one, you must be able to do it, you keep telling
>> us about the comparisons that you make.
>
> You are asking me to provide evidence that one of our space shuttles blew up
> on launch by proving it happened before.

No we are not, but if you have to resort to such arguements, it just 
shows your failure.

> What an asshole you have turned
> out to be.

Back to abuse, really is that the best you can do?

>
> No, the real issue is in theory the following can be the remains of a
> Nuclear Demoltion and nothing else even comes close to explaining why so
> much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers remained standing strong and not
> crushed by 100 floors of falling debris.
>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

So now you are comparing 911 with a theory.

> 9/11 was CGIs and nukes and we even know who had both the motive and the
> ability to use CGIs and nukes from the following videos:
>
> Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI
>
> WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
>   https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYH8?t=30s
>
> Rooky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530253

On 03/11/2015 22:34, Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:n1ba2e$su4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like
>>> a
>>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>
>> Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
>> whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?
>
> ROTFLMAO because neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission even tried to
> claim the following represents a collapse:
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> As a matter of fact the reason why NIST never used the term "pancake" is the
> remains of the Twin Towers certainly do not represent a "pancake" collapse.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> The truth is right in front of your eyes.  CGIs flew into the Twin Towers
> because of the total lack of crash dynamics and the following is not the
> remains of any type of collapse since most the Twin Towers floated away
> instead of down to the ground.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Now who had the power and money to pull off such a stunt?
>
> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event"
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>
> Rockefeller GLOATS About 9/11 in 1967!
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWcARHV71bU
>
> Also see:
>   https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockefeller+federal+reserve
>
> Rocky
>
>


Are you to stupid to answer the question, or are you to scared, or is it 
that you can't answer?

But in case you have forgot the question, I'll repeat it:-

Can you show us another nuclear demolition so we can see for ourselves
whether the 9/11 aftermath "looks exactly like a nuclear demolition"?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530246

<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> > "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
> >
> > Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
> > will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> > You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
> > terrorist
> > boogy-men.
> >
> > The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
> >
> > Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
> >
> > Attention:
> > You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
> > denying
> > or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can 
> > provide.
> >
> >
> > *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> > It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> > something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> > of the Muslim ... grow up.
>
> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like 
> a
> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event 
> "
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>
> Rocky

Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes" can 
vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.

===========================

ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story building 
will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the North Tower or 
anywhere near those two items either.  <G>

What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10 story 
building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530252

On 03/11/2015 22:41, Rocky wrote:
> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
>>> will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
>>> terrorist
>>> boogy-men.
>>>
>>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>>>
>>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>>>
>>> Attention:
>>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
>>> denying
>>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can
>>> provide.
>>>
>>>
>>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
>>
>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
>> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
>> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like
>> a
>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
>> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event
>> "
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>>
>> Rocky
>
> Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes" can
> vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
>
> ===========================
>
> ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story building
> will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the North Tower or
> anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
>

Nothing to do with his comments, yet another time when you are to scared 
to answer.

> What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10 story
> building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530305

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 22:58:44 +0000, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

[...]

>> Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes" can
>> vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
>>
>> ===========================
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story building
>> will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the North Tower or
>> anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
>>
>
>Nothing to do with his comments, yet another time when you are to scared 
>to answer.

     Roger can't offer the evidence requested since none exists. He
must try to divert attention from a claim he's already PROVED to be
wrong.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530481

In article <n1be31$nj5$2@dont-email.me>,
 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

> On 03/11/2015 22:41, Rocky wrote:
> > <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
> > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> >> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> >>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
> >>>
> >>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
> >>> will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> >>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
> >>> terrorist
> >>> boogy-men.
> >>>
> >>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
> >>>
> >>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
> >>>
> >>> Attention:
> >>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
> >>> denying
> >>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can
> >>> provide.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> >>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> >>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> >>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
> >>
> >> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
> >> terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
> >> jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like
> >> a
> >> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
> >>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>
> >> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> >> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event
> >> "
> >>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
> >>
> >> Rocky
> >
> > Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes" can
> > vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
> >
> > ===========================
> >
> > ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story building
> > will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the North Tower or
> > anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
> >
> 
> Nothing to do with his comments, yet another time when you are to scared 
> to answer.
> 
> > What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10 story
> > building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
> >   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >
> > Rocky
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com

We may never know "What really Happened" so much effort was put into 
hiding the facts, covering up and preventing any investigations.
almost like the perps had something to hide.
One thing we all know , no steel reinforced buildings ever fell from 
fire alone.  And 3 on one day.
Give me a break !
ask over 2300 architects and engineers. they say the lies were 
impossible to believe. www.ae911truth.org/
follow the yellow brick road. 
remember the perps got away with 9/11 , that encouraged them to cook up 
the WMD in Iraq.
Feel safer knowing who's in charge?
Google; 9/11 truth
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530522

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:47:11 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

[...]

>> > ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story building
>> > will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the North Tower or
>> > anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
>> >
>> 
>> Nothing to do with his comments, yet another time when you are to scared 
>> to answer.
>> 
>
>We may never know "What really Happened" so much effort was put into 

     We do know. That your mind is unable to accept the truth does not
mean we don't know.

>hiding the facts, covering up and preventing any investigations.
>almost like the perps had something to hide.

     Following that logic, you will post your full name, address,
place of employment, Social Security number and credit/debit card
number(s) with the three digit security code(s). If you don't, it will
mean, by YOUR standards, you have something to hide.

>One thing we all know , no steel reinforced buildings ever fell from 
>fire alone.  

     A bit of truth. Wow.

>And 3 on one day.

     Where? When? Be specific.
     On 9/11 three building collapsed due to structural damage and
fire. As such, we can KNOW you are not referring to them. They didn't
fall due to fire alone.
     Of course the truth is you're lying. 

>Give me a break !
>ask over 2300 architects and engineers. they say the lies were 
>impossible to believe. www.ae911truth.org/

     This is why only fellow mental defects accept your claims.

>follow the yellow brick road. 
>remember the perps got away with 9/11 , that encouraged them to cook up 
>the WMD in Iraq.

     The British were behind 9/11? Bar you lying, again, you'll post
the evidence that the British, from whom we got the intel claiming
Iraq had WMDs, were being the 9/11 attacks.
     Oh wait. I've made this same request the last two times you
posted the lie. You've run away form the request both times. You'll
surely do so again, since truth and honesty are concepts your mind
finds too difficult to deal with.

>Feel safer knowing who's in charge?
>Google; 9/11 truth

     And see more of the LIES of the mentally ill who claim 9/11 was
anything other than what it really was.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530706 — well, no; and

no, and yes;
see about the Suadi princelet on larouchepub.com

>      The British were behind 9/11? Bar you lying, again, you'll post
> the evidence that the British, from whom we got the intel claiming
> Iraq had WMDs, were being the 9/11 attacks.
>      Oh wait. I've made this same request the last two times you
> posted the lie. You've run away form the request both times. You'll
> surely do so again, since truth and honesty are concepts your mind
> finds too difficult to deal with.
> 
> >Feel safer knowing who's in charge?
> >Google; 9/11 truth
> 
>      And see more of the LIES of the mentally ill who claim 9/11 was
> anything other than what it really was.
> 
> -- 
> Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530369

In article <KbmdnV8uFszIpaTLnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> > "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> > > "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
> > >
> > > Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report, that
> > > will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> > > You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
> > > terrorist
> > > boogy-men.
> > >
> > > The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
> > >
> > > Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
> > >
> > > Attention:
> > > You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
> > > denying
> > > or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can 
> > > provide.
> > >
> > >
> > > *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> > > It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> > > something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> > > of the Muslim ... grow up.
> >
> > As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war on
> > terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the bogus
> > jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks exactly like 
> > a
> > nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
> >  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >
> > As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> > "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event 
> > "
> >  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
> >
> > Rocky
> 
> Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes" can 
> vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
> 
> ===========================
> 
> ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story building 
> will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the North Tower or 
> anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
> 
> What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10 story 
> building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> Rocky 

When all was said and done. More was said than done, in finding the 
Truth.
But, there are two things that i've noticed. 
The system is quite vigilant when it comes to attacking anyone who asks 
questions about What really happened. Oh, they call the "truthers" all 
kinds of things. but. you just know they have quite a House o Cards to 
maintain. If the truth ever came out. A quite large ball of wax will 
melt. Wars and the attacks on your privacy.
And the cover-ups. 
visit;  www.ae911truth.org/ for more.
or 
Just Google; 9/11 Truth.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530377

Shoe-Chucker 2 wrote:
> In article <KbmdnV8uFszIpaTLnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report,
>>>> that will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
>>>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
>>>> terrorist
>>>> boogy-men.
>>>>
>>>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
>>>>
>>>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
>>>>
>>>> Attention:
>>>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
>>>> denying
>>>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can
>>>> provide.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
>>>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
>>>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
>>>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
>>>
>>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war
>>> on terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the
>>> bogus jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks
>>> exactly like a
>>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
>>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
>>> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged
>>> Event "
>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes"
>> can vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
>>
>> ===========================
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story
>> building will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the
>> North Tower or anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
>>
>> What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10
>> story building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Rocky
>
> When all was said and done. More was said than done, in finding the
> Truth.
> But, there are two things that i've noticed.
> The system is quite vigilant when it comes to attacking anyone who asks
> questions about What really happened. Oh, they call the "truthers" all
> kinds of things. but. you just know they have quite a House o Cards to
> maintain. If the truth ever came out. A quite large ball of wax will
> melt. Wars and the attacks on your privacy.
> And the cover-ups.
> visit;  www.ae911truth.org/ for more.
> or
> Just Google; 9/11 Truth.




Yes I agree absolutely.
That was why I posted this.
I had to prove something to a friend

All you need is 9/11 in the subject line for the mind-controled zombi's to 
swoop in to  save the world from someone asking questions.
....Discussion of 9/11 is VERBOTEN under pain of DEATH, in new world order 
AMERIKA.

And no one even seemed to notice that the link had nothing to do with 9/11 
at all.
So that tells you how much anyone responding is willing to consider, no 
matter what proof is provided. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530385

On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 2:34:21 PM UTC-5, Bast wrote:
> Shoe-Chucker 2 wrote:
> > In article <KbmdnV8uFszIpaTLnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:c9890ca0-148b-427d-ae82-05ccf3d205f8@googlegroups.com...
> >> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 4:03:34 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> >>> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:c44c2$5638e5a1$453ebb0b$2161@EVERESTKC.NET...
> >>>> "Bast"  wrote in message news:n18u57$riu$$1@dont-email.me...
> >>>>
> >>>> Your government is preparing the second edition of the 9/11 report,
> >>>> that will include the latest truth for you to embrace.
> >>>> You are either with "us" who accept this, .....or you are with the
> >>>> terrorist
> >>>> boogy-men.
> >>>>
> >>>> The Nail In The Coffin - RIP GLOBE EARTH - Proof Positive!
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1FRBwnxazk
> >>>>
> >>>> Big Brother Central, thanks you for your attention.
> >>>>
> >>>> Attention:
> >>>> You of the 9/11 truth movement will be called kooks and traitors for
> >>>> denying
> >>>> or even questioning  this, despite any logical arguments you can
> >>>> provide.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> *** Say, Bastie, are you ever going to get over 9/11 ???
> >>>> It's eating you like a nasty cancer ... I mean, even I got over
> >>>> something far worse, namely the election and re-election
> >>>> of the Muslim ... grow up.
> >>>
> >>> As long as our government keeps using the 9/11 lie for it's bogus war
> >>> on terror why stop pointing out that 9/11 was a very big lie from the
> >>> bogus jets, to the bogus jumpers to the bogus "collapse" that looks
> >>> exactly like a
> >>> nuclear demolition and there is a lot more.
> >>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>>
> >>> As a matter of fact the only real thing about 9/11 are the boogie men.
> >>> "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged
> >>> Event "
> >>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY
> >>>
> >>> Rocky
> >>
> >> Still waiting for you to show evidence that "deep underground nukes"
> >> can vaporize buildings. Not holding my breath, though.
> >>
> >> ===========================
> >>
> >> ROTFLMAO because you have failed to prove a collapse of a 110 story
> >> building will not land on top of outside walls or staircase B in the
> >> North Tower or anywhere near those two items either.  <G>
> >>
> >> What you see in the following looks more like the collapse of a 10
> >> story building so what happened to the other 100 floors of debris?
> >>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> >>
> >> Rocky
> >
> > When all was said and done. More was said than done, in finding the
> > Truth.
> > But, there are two things that i've noticed.
> > The system is quite vigilant when it comes to attacking anyone who asks
> > questions about What really happened. Oh, they call the "truthers" all
> > kinds of things. but. you just know they have quite a House o Cards to
> > maintain. If the truth ever came out. A quite large ball of wax will
> > melt. Wars and the attacks on your privacy.
> > And the cover-ups.
> > visit;  www.ae911truth.org/ for more.
> > or
> > Just Google; 9/11 Truth.
> 
> Yes I agree absolutely.
> That was why I posted this.
> I had to prove something to a friend
> 
> All you need is 9/11 in the subject line for the mind-controled zombi's to 
> swoop in to  save the world from someone asking questions.
> ....Discussion of 9/11 is VERBOTEN under pain of DEATH, in new world order 
> AMERIKA.
> 
> And no one even seemed to notice that the link had nothing to do with 9/11 
> at all.
> So that tells you how much anyone responding is willing to consider, no 
> matter what proof is provided.

It's November 2015. Enough small talk.

So two hours of JFK's Brain, plus two hours of Einstein's Brain.

Since History Channel repeats itself, that's four hours down the train's drain!

Come 11/9, those four hours will again repeat. But ha, I got DVR! So there!

-- Mahipal "Those four lines could've just been my sig lines. Stay on topic!" 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530547

Shut up, idiot.

-- Mahipal "Nothing I post"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web