Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #528008 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-24 23:07 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-11-01 13:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 168 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 23:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 07:09 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-25 06:03 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-25 09:59 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:05 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 18:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 22:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:16 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 10:15 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 16:18 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 15:21 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:14 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 19:24 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 20:00 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 03:21 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-01 09:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 14:27 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 20:45 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 14:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:09 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 17:12 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 12:22 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 14:36 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 13:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:57 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:15 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-26 11:32 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 10:57 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:36 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-26 13:41 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 15:05 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:14 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-31 21:25 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-31 19:12 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-01 01:07 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 07:58 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-02 17:10 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 11:26 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 19:08 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 13:44 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 23:45 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 16:24 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 23:08 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 23:45 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 06:26 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:30 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-03 12:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 15:20 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 21:22 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-13 03:52 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 15:30 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-04 16:34 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-05 07:01 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 11:06 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:16 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:50 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:29 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 03:25 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 03:25 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-10 20:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:30 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-01 20:30 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 19:52 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-02 13:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:59 -0800
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 13:29 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-02 18:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 18:09 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 06:32 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:38 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:15 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-10 09:58 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:48 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-11 15:06 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-11 15:26 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-11 17:02 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-11 20:01 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-11 17:25 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 03:51 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 08:59 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-12 09:48 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-12 10:32 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-12 18:03 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 18:17 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:56 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 21:26 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-13 06:38 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:56 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 21:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 03:48 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-13 09:40 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-13 16:11 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-13 16:09 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-13 22:17 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 04:25 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 15:55 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-26 08:55 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 19:27 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 21:24 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:30 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:33 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 10:24 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 11:03 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:28 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-25 16:37 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-26 11:35 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:37 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:46 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:49 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 08:02 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-28 20:45 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-28 22:28 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:06 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-29 09:32 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 17:15 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 14:29 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:44 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 19:18 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:36 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 13:38 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:38 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:46 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:35 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 08:03 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-28 18:44 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 14:50 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-28 10:00 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:57 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 10:02 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-29 18:29 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 15:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-30 06:05 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-30 16:51 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-31 04:39 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:48 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-28 20:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-29 20:53 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-30 18:23 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-31 03:13 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 12:09 -0700
Expansion of the Universe Explained. Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-01 13:45 -0700
Page 4 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 11:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <YbqdnQttDJxrT93LnZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530514 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n1eurp$q9r$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>news:cd31499d-3430-415e-b54b-fb98325a9da4@googlegroups.com... >>On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-6, edrh...@hotmail.com >>wrote: >>... >>> I'm still waiting for evidence that "deep underground nukes" can >>> vaporize >>> buildings on the surface without breaching and leaving a crater behind. > >>A sensible request that will always be ignored by Rocky. The video >>compilation of underground nuclear tests clearly shows what every sane >>person knows: Neither the surface or anything above it are "vaporized" if >>the explosion fails to breech the surface. Shortly afterwards, there is an >>enormous subsidence, leaving a crater. > >>Just don't expect Rocky to ever acknowledge it. > >>Dan (Woj...) > >>======================= > >>And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 > > <snip dozens of lines of evasion> > > So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the > ground? There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we can not believe any of them but what we can believe is the following: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Now don't get lost in explaining the top of the Twin Towers did not fall straight down because I want to know what happened to the 10 floors of debris directly above the multiple floor surviving corners. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg ROTFLMAO because I think you are starting to figure out why NIST and the 9/11 Commission ignored the photos that prove the Twin Towers were brought down by Nuclear Demolitions where all the nukes had to do was vaporize the Twin Towers right up to the alleged impact point to fool millions. And don't forget thanks to dmaster we know that deep underground nukes don't make a flash, EMP or generate a large amount of heat. But since nothing else explains the following then it has to be what is left after a nuclear demolition since a deep underground nuke that was not directly under the Twin Towers would explain the following photo. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1quqo$b0b$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531436 |
On 09/11/2015 17:06, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:n1eurp$q9r$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>> news:cd31499d-3430-415e-b54b-fb98325a9da4@googlegroups.com... >>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-6, edrh...@hotmail.com >>> wrote: >>> ... >>>> I'm still waiting for evidence that "deep underground nukes" can >>>> vaporize >>>> buildings on the surface without breaching and leaving a crater behind. >> >>> A sensible request that will always be ignored by Rocky. The video >>> compilation of underground nuclear tests clearly shows what every sane >>> person knows: Neither the surface or anything above it are "vaporized" if >>> the explosion fails to breech the surface. Shortly afterwards, there is an >>> enormous subsidence, leaving a crater. >> >>> Just don't expect Rocky to ever acknowledge it. >> >>> Dan (Woj...) >> >>> ======================= >> >>> And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 >> >> <snip dozens of lines of evasion> >> >> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the >> ground? > > There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we can > not believe any of them but what we can believe is the following: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to? > Now don't get lost in explaining the top of the Twin Towers did not fall > straight down because I want to know what happened to the 10 floors of > debris directly above the multiple floor surviving corners. <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > ROTFLMAO because I think you are starting to figure out why NIST and the > 9/11 Commission ignored the photos that prove the Twin Towers were brought > down by Nuclear Demolitions where all the nukes had to do was vaporize the > Twin Towers right up to the alleged impact point to fool millions. > > And don't forget thanks to dmaster we know that deep underground nukes don't > make a flash, EMP or generate a large amount of heat. But since nothing > else explains the following then it has to be what is left after a nuclear > demolition since a deep underground nuke that was not directly under the > Twin Towers would explain the following photo. <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 14:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XPudnQHKy7AemtzLnZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #531509 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:n1quqo$b0b$6@dont-email.me... > On 09/11/2015 17:06, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:n1eurp$q9r$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>> "dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>> news:cd31499d-3430-415e-b54b-fb98325a9da4@googlegroups.com... >>>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-6, edrh...@hotmail.com >>>> wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> I'm still waiting for evidence that "deep underground nukes" can >>>>> vaporize >>>>> buildings on the surface without breaching and leaving a crater >>>>> behind. >>> >>>> A sensible request that will always be ignored by Rocky. The video >>>> compilation of underground nuclear tests clearly shows what every sane >>>> person knows: Neither the surface or anything above it are "vaporized" >>>> if >>>> the explosion fails to breech the surface. Shortly afterwards, there is >>>> an >>>> enormous subsidence, leaving a crater. >>> >>>> Just don't expect Rocky to ever acknowledge it. >>> >>>> Dan (Woj...) >>> >>>> ======================= >>> >>>> And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 >>> >>> <snip dozens of lines of evasion> >>> >>> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the >>> ground? >> >> There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we >> can >> not believe any of them but what we can believe is the following: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> > > Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to? Just how many nuclear demoltions do there have to be before you can accept the fact the only thing that explains the following is a Nuclear Demoltion? http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg If you have to see evidence of a fifth Nuclear Demoltion how can I be sure you will not ask for evidence of six, seven or eight? FYI the great big whole in WTC6 where the debris floated away could also be called a "Nuclear Demoltion" but it didn't finish WTC6 off the way the bigger nukes finished their targets off. You are just like the asshole bankers who do not want our wars to stop because they make so much money from them. You have to keep up your endless questions because you can not think for yourself. Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI And the following is the first video I've seen to point the finger for The Great 9/11 Hoax at one of our bankers. WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1r83h$h14$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531524 |
On 09/11/2015 20:50, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n1quqo$b0b$6@dont-email.me... >> On 09/11/2015 17:06, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n1eurp$q9r$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> "dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:cd31499d-3430-415e-b54b-fb98325a9da4@googlegroups.com... >>>>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-6, edrh...@hotmail.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>> I'm still waiting for evidence that "deep underground nukes" can >>>>>> vaporize >>>>>> buildings on the surface without breaching and leaving a crater >>>>>> behind. >>>> >>>>> A sensible request that will always be ignored by Rocky. The video >>>>> compilation of underground nuclear tests clearly shows what every sane >>>>> person knows: Neither the surface or anything above it are "vaporized" >>>>> if >>>>> the explosion fails to breech the surface. Shortly afterwards, there is >>>>> an >>>>> enormous subsidence, leaving a crater. >>>> >>>>> Just don't expect Rocky to ever acknowledge it. >>>> >>>>> Dan (Woj...) >>>> >>>>> ======================= >>>> >>>>> And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 >>>> >>>> <snip dozens of lines of evasion> >>>> >>>> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the >>>> ground? >>> >>> There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we >>> can >>> not believe any of them but what we can believe is the following: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >> >> Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to? > > Just how many nuclear demoltions do there have to be before you can accept > the fact the only thing that explains the following is a Nuclear Demoltion? > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg We all are still waiting for you to produce a link/cite/reference to a nuclear demolition, your lack of evidence is just proof of your liaes. > > If you have to see evidence of a fifth Nuclear Demoltion how can I be sure > you will not ask for evidence of six, seven or eight? > We are all asking for you to post the details of the nuclear demolition that you are comparing 911 with, we have been doing this for months, yet you have failed to do so. > FYI the great big whole in WTC6 where the debris floated away could also be > called a "Nuclear Demoltion" but it didn't finish WTC6 off the way the > bigger nukes finished their targets off. > > You are just like the asshole bankers who do not want our wars to stop > because they make so much money from them. You have to keep up your endless > questions because you can not think for yourself. Dear dear, now you resorting to name-calling, how sad. Perhaps if you answered the questions that many have asked, we could look at your evidence, but so far you have failed. > > Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI > > And the following is the first video I've seen to point the finger for The > Great 9/11 Hoax at one of our bankers. > > WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE > https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1rvb7$u3l$7@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #531524 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >news:n1quqo$b0b$6@dont-email.me... >> Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to? >Just how many nuclear demoltions do there have to be before you can accept >the fact the only thing that explains the following is a Nuclear Demoltion? Since you said your copy of the 9/17/2001 NOAA photo with the kookscribbles "looks exactly like" a nuclear demolition, we need just one, so we have something to compare it to. More would be better, of course. >If you have to see evidence of a fifth Nuclear Demoltion how can I be sure >you will not ask for evidence of six, seven or eight? Fifth? I must have missed your post showing four other nuclear demolitions to compare 9/11 to. You mean you actually answered my question for once? Could you repost that post with the four other nuclear demolitions, and where and when they took place?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 03:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ovd34b1pg8c9po80eoe3em17kejafqg64m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #531719 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:29:11 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>news:n1quqo$b0b$6@dont-email.me...
>
>>> Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to?
>
>>Just how many nuclear demoltions do there have to be before you can accept
>>the fact the only thing that explains the following is a Nuclear Demoltion?
>
>Since you said your copy of the 9/17/2001 NOAA photo with the
>kookscribbles "looks exactly like" a nuclear demolition, we need just
>one, so we have something to compare it to.
>
>More would be better, of course.
>
>>If you have to see evidence of a fifth Nuclear Demoltion how can I be sure
>>you will not ask for evidence of six, seven or eight?
>
>Fifth? I must have missed your post showing four other nuclear
>demolitions to compare 9/11 to. You mean you actually answered my
>question for once? Could you repost that post with the four other
>nuclear demolitions, and where and when they took place?
Everyone must have missed the post.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 03:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hvd34bhtc08snbr72oae2qjf34etkrt641@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #531509 |
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:16:32 +0000, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>> And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11
>>>
>>> <snip dozens of lines of evasion>
>>>
>>> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the
>>> ground?
>>
>> There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we can
>> not believe any of them but what we can believe is the following:
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>
>Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to?
As of the time I write this, I've never seen Roger answer a
question asked of him. He always resorts to diversion.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 20:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1tkmf$pbv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531736 |
On 10/11/2015 09:25, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:16:32 +0000, Tony Dragon > <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote: > > [...] > >>>>> And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 >>>> >>>> <snip dozens of lines of evasion> >>>> >>>> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the >>>> ground? >>> >>> There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we can >>> not believe any of them but what we can believe is the following: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >> >> Answer the question asked, or are you to scared to? > > As of the time I write this, I've never seen Roger answer a > question asked of him. He always resorts to diversion. You mean the equivalent of a child sticking its fingers in its ears and shouting "la la la la I can't hear you"? > > > "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their > belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." > > Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used > on 9/11/01 in > Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1rvdj$u3l$8@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #531436 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n1eurp$q9r$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> <snip dozens of lines of evasion> >> >> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the >> ground? >There are so many inconsistencies between the videos taken on 9/11/01 we can <snip evasion> Answer his question. How can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the ground?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 20:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529468 |
In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <n0lcdm$sa6$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> Tony Dragon wrote: > >>> On 25/10/2015 23:57, Bast wrote: > >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: > >>>>> On 25/10/2015 18:47, Rocky wrote: > >>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:n0j7b4$7hp$1@dont-email.me... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>> news:n0j2e7$cqv$1@dont-email.me... > >>>>>>>>> On 25/10/2015 16:09, Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>> news:n0inni$s1r$2@dont-email.me... > >>>>>>>>>>> On 25/10/2015 12:09, Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>> news:1f7e8363-eefd-4622-8f54-82c6074c3f73@googlegroups.com... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 4:09:00 AM UTC, Rocky wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:n0hfg4$kja$1@dont-email.me... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKgrx52XrCU > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ================= > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, what a great video and I wish they had used more > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quotes from the Harley > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guy because he also called the World Trade Center "Ground > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zero" so where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he getting is BS from. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then look at NIST because basically all they did was > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expand on the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit we got from the Harley Guy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> First the film uses the term 'experts' to indicate that they > >>>>>>>>>>>>> were not experts, note this expert did not mention > >>>>>>>>>>>>> disappearing wings (none was visible) opr the sound of a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> nuclear explosion. So a bystander who 'SAW' the plane hit > >>>>>>>>>>>>> said the collapse was > >>>>>>>>>>>>> due to structural failure, the building fell down, therefor > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the structure failed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Where did he get this all from", well what he said sounds > >>>>>>>>>>>>> logical to me, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> planes impact, fuel. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "why does he change the subject" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he is commenting on the overall incident & on the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> news video gathered > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does he use the emotional buzzwords? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not, he used words that reflected how he felt. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then an expert is asked to give his opinion of O B L & he > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tells what his > >>>>>>>>>>>>> intelligence suspects, looks like he is doing his job. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Think about it", I have, seems like a normal fast put > >>>>>>>>>>>>> together news feed > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Who is this guy?", he is somebody who saw the planes hit > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the buildings. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Everbody else was in shock", that was because they 'SAW' > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the planes hit > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the buildings. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Crisis Actors are paid to say what their script tells them to > >>>>>>>>>>>> say. Duh. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Walsh - Harley Guy - Pugh - Who's Who? > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhaBgOPEIM > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> And when the jets in Nuke York City are viewed in slow motion > >>>>>>>>>>>> why do they > >>>>>>>>>>>> suddenly look like CGIs instead? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Conclusive Evidence the 9/11 Planes were NOT REAL > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock > >>>>>>>>>>> were actors. Can you give me the name of the company that > >>>>>>>>>>> hires out these 'crisis > >>>>>>>>>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name > >>>>>>>>>>> or actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy > >>>>>>>>>>> shares in that company. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Google is your friend. See: > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I asked for the company, not a search link. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Why the hell you think just one company would use Crisis Actors > >>>>>>>> is beyond me. Do you think only one company makes Sci-Fi movies > >>>>>>>> too? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hell, not only do a lot of companies make Sci-Fi movies but the > >>>>>>>> media will even use Sci-Fi movies for Prime Time news as proven > >>>>>>>> by 9/11. Rocky > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I checked my local phone book, and wouldn't you know it. > >>>>>>> NOT EVEN ONE listing, for terrorist talent agencies, or even a > >>>>>>> branch of ISIS, in my city. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Perhaps the number for Planned Parenthood or a regional Federal > >>>>>>> Reserve bank, will do ??? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you want to rob a bank, buy a gun. > >>>>>> If you want to rob the world, buy a bank. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And I have to add this to the above sentences that have been posted > >>>>>> all over the place: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And if you want to help rob the world buy six Television networks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rocky > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> So only six networks were in the 'conspiracy'? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Actually it's 6 OWNERS,....that own and control all the Western > >>>> media. So when a propaganda story needs to be sold,...all you need > >>>> is to control those 6 to send the memos down the line. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> So six people (or companies) own all the western media, even if true > >>> how about the non-western media? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Do you mean the ones who give us proof that 9/11 was an inside job ? > >> That ISIS and Al quieda are created and funded by the US ? > >> That the US routinely LIES to it's own people ? > >> That the US is controlled by the world banksters ? > >> That the economy of the US is now so indebted to the banksters, that > >> every citizen probably owes well over millions of dollars EACH ? > >> That the Russians are actually the ones who are the GOOD GUYS ? > >> > >> > >> And that unless their attention is diverted by drugging the food and > >> water, fear of imaginary boogy-men, and kim kardashians ass > >> size....Most of the population would riot and killl the politicians. > >> > >> > >> But of course we are only to believe that is pure propaganda though. > >> > >> You have internet. > >> Look for the news feeds of places like RT (Russia Today) especially > >> if you can understand languages other than English, and compare it to > >> the Western news. > >> > >> When you get your news from various sources, you can discover truths > >> you never would have considered before. > > > > You would be better off hanging a sign around your neck saying, "I'm a > > gullible moron who ditched science class, have no idea how anything > > works, and am a total loon". > > > > > This is why I can't be bothered to take anything you say seriously. The truth hurts, sometimes. I just call you as I see you. > Your responses always look like something a 12 year old, hopped-up crack > addict, might put togther. That's your opinion, and coming from a dunce (My apologies to the other, smarter dunces), I consider it a compliment. > > ...And my only logical response down to your your level should be something > like ....."oh ya ?,..well so's yer old man" > > Your logic is nothing like what sane people consider logical thinking. That's one of the funny things about your postings/ravings. > > Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? No, I usually ignore Rocky's trollings. He's doing a bit, you're the real deal. > You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 planes. > > Theory of Ghosptlane > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible would take it seriously. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 19:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <3Y-dnaIE25oyXKvLnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529825 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com... > In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 >> planes. >> >> Theory of Ghosptlane >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc > > Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible > would take it seriously. ROTFLMAO because you have to be a complete idiot to miss the fact only CGIs can melt into buildings without slowing down or loosing parts. And there is a reason why NIST could not explain the remains of the Twin Towers and that is because only a Nuclear Demolition can do that. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n18bac$ebh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #529834 |
Rocky wrote: > "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com... >> In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >> says... >>> >>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 >>> planes. >>> >>> Theory of Ghosptlane >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc >> >> Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible >> would take it seriously. > > ROTFLMAO because you have to be a complete idiot to miss the fact only > CGIs can melt into buildings without slowing down or loosing parts. > > And there is a reason why NIST could not explain the remains of the Twin > Towers and that is because only a Nuclear Demolition can do that. <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky What BDK and the other DWEEBunkers don't understand is that many of us NEVER did take any part of 9/11 "seriously". We refused to "take seriously" ,.... ......that the US military could be so inneffective. .....That large office towers could turn to dust,.....3 times in one day .....That we should start never-ending wars to hunt down boogy-men .....Or that things that were captured on news reports and video were just figmnets of our imagination ( molten steel, and invisible planes that vanished) Outr non-belief started on the day of 9/11, and has grown as the evidence they tried so hard to suppress, keeps surfacing. 9/11 was an inside job. And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of who really was behind it, into the history books.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 10:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <913ed787-b006-45cf-9c88-45a8431a5f58@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529964 |
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 12:53:08 PM UTC-6, Bast wrote: > Rocky wrote: > > "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message > > news:MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com... > >> In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid > >> says... > >>> > >>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? > >>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 > >>> planes. > >>> > >>> Theory of Ghosptlane > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc > >> > >> Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible > >> would take it seriously. > > > > ROTFLMAO because you have to be a complete idiot to miss the fact only > > CGIs can melt into buildings without slowing down or loosing parts. > > > > And there is a reason why NIST could not explain the remains of the Twin > > Towers and that is because only a Nuclear Demolition can do that. <G> > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > > > Rocky > > > > > > > > > > What BDK and the other DWEEBunkers don't understand is that many of us NEVER > did take any part of 9/11 "seriously". > > We refused to "take seriously" ,.... > ......that the US military could be so inneffective. > .....That large office towers could turn to dust,.....3 times in one day > .....That we should start never-ending wars to hunt down boogy-men > .....Or that things that were captured on news reports and video were just > figmnets of our imagination ( molten steel, and invisible planes that > vanished) > > Outr non-belief started on the day of 9/11, and has grown as the evidence > they tried so hard to suppress, keeps surfacing. > > > 9/11 was an inside job. > And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of > who really was behind it, into the history books. Islamic radicals were behind it, taking advantage of the Bush fuckups in the middle east and the coddling by the Saudis that kept that sword pointed elsewhere, instead of internally. Thats why islamic fuckheads like to yell about jews and satanic america, to keep their divided, fucked up house from consuming them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYxLZMnVygc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 13:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <uLidnXbtBZd-JKrLnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529966 |
"Apollyon" <adravirgo@gmail.com> wrote in message news:913ed787-b006-45cf-9c88-45a8431a5f58@googlegroups.com... On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 12:53:08 PM UTC-6, Bast wrote: > Rocky wrote: > > "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message > > news:MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com... > >> In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid > >> says... > >>> > >>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? > >>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 > >>> planes. > >>> > >>> Theory of Ghosptlane > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc > >> > >> Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible > >> would take it seriously. > > > > ROTFLMAO because you have to be a complete idiot to miss the fact only > > CGIs can melt into buildings without slowing down or loosing parts. > > > > And there is a reason why NIST could not explain the remains of the Twin > > Towers and that is because only a Nuclear Demolition can do that. <G> > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > > > Rocky > > > > What BDK and the other DWEEBunkers don't understand is that many of us > NEVER > did take any part of 9/11 "seriously". > > We refused to "take seriously" ,.... > ......that the US military could be so inneffective. > .....That large office towers could turn to dust,.....3 times in one day > .....That we should start never-ending wars to hunt down boogy-men > .....Or that things that were captured on news reports and video were just > figmnets of our imagination ( molten steel, and invisible planes that > vanished) > > Outr non-belief started on the day of 9/11, and has grown as the evidence > they tried so hard to suppress, keeps surfacing. > > > 9/11 was an inside job. > And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of > who really was behind it, into the history books. Islamic radicals were behind it, taking advantage of the Bush fuckups in the middle east and the coddling by the Saudis that kept that sword pointed elsewhere, instead of internally. Thats why islamic fuckheads like to yell about jews and satanic america, to keep their divided, fucked up house from consuming them. ======================== If Islamic radicals were behind 9/11 why is it that the jets were consistent with CGIs in 4 ways? 1. The skipping of the jet from one spot to the next instead of a smooth flight. 2. One wing disappeared in flight. 3. The melting into the Towers with no slow down or lost parts. 4. The fact that secondary explosives had to be used to cut the roadrunner shaped holes? The people behind 9/11 wanted us to know it was an inside job or they would not have dropped so many clues at our feet. DUH Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 18:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30a1bc45cea463af98c3aa@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529964 |
In article <n18bac$ebh$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message > > news:MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com... > >> In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid > >> says... > >>> > >>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? > >>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 > >>> planes. > >>> > >>> Theory of Ghosptlane > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc > >> > >> Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible > >> would take it seriously. > > > > ROTFLMAO because you have to be a complete idiot to miss the fact only > > CGIs can melt into buildings without slowing down or loosing parts. > > > > And there is a reason why NIST could not explain the remains of the Twin > > Towers and that is because only a Nuclear Demolition can do that. <G> > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > > > Rocky > > > > > > > > > > What BDK and the other DWEEBunkers don't understand is that many of us NEVER > did take any part of 9/11 "seriously". > > We refused to "take seriously" ,.... > ......that the US military could be so inneffective. > .....That large office towers could turn to dust,.....3 times in one day > .....That we should start never-ending wars to hunt down boogy-men > .....Or that things that were captured on news reports and video were just > figmnets of our imagination ( molten steel, and invisible planes that > vanished) You appear to be totally delusional, as nothing turned to dust, that's only a troofer claim that is totally bogus. The rest of the above stuff appears to be things only troofers see. Magic. > > Outr non-belief started on the day of 9/11, and has grown as the evidence > they tried so hard to suppress, keeps surfacing. > > > 9/11 was an inside job. > And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of > who really was behind it, into the history books. Wow, you've topped the stupidity level of your previous most stupid posts with this one. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 18:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <rouf3b9srkfcu4ep20q7vs9tkh4anpe56l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #529964 |
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:53:04 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Rocky wrote:
>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.30a086ced338381598c3a4@news.giganews.com...
>>> In article <n133a6$5ma$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ?
>>>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11
>>>> planes.
>>>>
>>>> Theory of Ghosptlane
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
>>>
>>> Just another really stupid Troofer video. Only the dumb and gullible
>>> would take it seriously.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because you have to be a complete idiot to miss the fact only
>> CGIs can melt into buildings without slowing down or loosing parts.
>>
>> And there is a reason why NIST could not explain the remains of the Twin
>> Towers and that is because only a Nuclear Demolition can do that. <G>
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Rocky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>What BDK and the other DWEEBunkers don't understand is that many of us NEVER
>did take any part of 9/11 "seriously".
>
>We refused to "take seriously" ,....
>......that the US military could be so inneffective.
It wasn't.
>.....That large office towers could turn to dust,.....3 times in one day
Since they didn't, drywall and such did, this isn't an issue.
>.....That we should start never-ending wars to hunt down boogy-men
Fortunately, none have been started.
>.....Or that things that were captured on news reports and video were just
>figmnets of our imagination ( molten steel, and invisible planes that
>vanished)
Where can I, and/or anyone else with an interest, see these news
reports and videos? As of the time I write this, none have been seen.
>
>Outr non-belief started on the day of 9/11, and has grown as the evidence
>they tried so hard to suppress, keeps surfacing.
>
Yet you are unable to offer any.
Odd that.
>
>9/11 was an inside job.
But you are unable to produce any evidence for the claim.
>And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of
>who really was behind it, into the history books.
Terrorists were behind it. Old news.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 06:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n19kds$bnk$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #529964 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of >who really was behind it, into the history books. You kooktards insult the memory of those who were murdered by those 19 terrorists that day. You especially insult the memory of the 246 innocent plane passengers and crew whom you claim never were even on those planes. Nor can you explain where they went.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <RPGdna_tgvrDUd3LnZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530090 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n19kds$bnk$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of >>who really was behind it, into the history books. > > You kooktards insult the memory of those who were murdered by those 19 > terrorists that day. You especially insult the memory of the 246 innocent > plane passengers and crew whom you claim never were even on those planes. > Nor can you explain where they went. ROTFLMAO because it is hilarious that you can't take a close look at the evidence because you have let your mind be completely controlled by the anger your TV wanted to you feel. Just once overlook all your anger and just focus on the part that neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission can explain why the remains of the Twin Towers resemble a Nuclear Demolition with multiple floor surviving corners. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Or look at the jets ram the Twin Towers in slow motion and then ask yourself why do those jets resemble CGIs? Your mind has been fcuked with just like everybody else's and if you ever figure out why the Sears Tower in Chicago was evacuated on 9/11/01 when no jets could have gotten near it you will be closer to the truth. People are trying to help you and all you do is call them names. Is that the best you can do? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1ruh9$u3l$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #531429 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n19kds$bnk$2@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>>And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the truth of >>>who really was behind it, into the history books. >> >> You kooktards insult the memory of those who were murdered by those 19 >> terrorists that day. You especially insult the memory of the 246 innocent >> plane passengers and crew whom you claim never were even on those planes. >> Nor can you explain where they went. >ROTFLMAO because it is hilarious that you can't take a close look at the <snip evasion> No, we're talking about how you kooktards insult the memory of those who were murdered by those 19 terrorists. Nearly 3,000 people. Why don't you talk about that? >People are trying to help you Help me??? By trying to convince me to believe a pack of lies? > and all you do is call them names. Is that >the best you can do? I use accurate descriptions in my posts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 09:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1t142$4q5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531429 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:n19kds$bnk$2@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>> And we owe it to those who died that day and since, to force the >>> truth of who really was behind it, into the history books. >> >> You kooktards insult the memory of those who were murdered by those 19 >> terrorists that day. You especially insult the memory of the 246 >> innocent plane passengers and crew whom you claim never were even on >> those planes. Nor can you explain where they went. > > ROTFLMAO because it is hilarious that you can't take a close look at the > evidence because you have let your mind be completely controlled by the > anger your TV wanted to you feel. > > Just once overlook all your anger and just focus on the part that > neither you, NIST or the 9/11 Commission can explain why the remains of > the Twin Towers resemble a Nuclear Demolition with multiple floor > surviving corners. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > Or look at the jets ram the Twin Towers in slow motion and then ask > yourself why do those jets resemble CGIs? > > Your mind has been fcuked with just like everybody else's and if you > ever figure out why the Sears Tower in Chicago was evacuated on 9/11/01 > when no jets could have gotten near it you will be closer to the truth. > > People are trying to help you and all you do is call them names. Is > that the best you can do? > > Rocky Well you do have to give them credit for their ability to remember the script they have to keep parroting. Especially the part that "we" hurt the families of those who were killed,......When WE ARE THE FAMILIES !!!!! Every family of a 9/11 victim is front and center in the 9/11 truth movement. So for us having the truth exposed, is personal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web