Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #528008 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-24 23:07 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-11-01 13:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 168 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 23:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 07:09 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-25 06:03 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-25 09:59 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:05 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 18:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 22:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:16 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 10:15 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 16:18 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 15:21 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:14 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 19:24 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 20:00 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 03:21 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-01 09:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 14:27 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 20:45 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 14:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:09 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 17:12 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 12:22 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 14:36 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 13:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:57 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:15 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-26 11:32 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 10:57 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:36 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-26 13:41 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 15:05 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:14 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-31 21:25 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-31 19:12 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-01 01:07 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 07:58 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-02 17:10 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 11:26 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 19:08 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 13:44 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 23:45 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 16:24 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-03 23:08 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 23:45 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 06:26 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:30 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-03 12:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 15:20 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 21:22 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-13 03:52 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-03 15:30 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-04 16:34 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-05 07:01 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 11:06 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:16 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:50 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:29 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 03:25 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 03:25 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-10 20:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:30 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-01 20:30 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 19:52 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-02 13:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:59 -0800
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 13:29 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-02 18:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 18:09 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 06:32 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:38 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 05:15 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-10 09:58 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:48 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-11 15:06 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-11 15:26 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-11 17:02 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-11 20:01 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-11 17:25 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 03:51 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 08:59 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-12 09:48 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-12 10:32 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-12 18:03 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 18:17 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:56 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 21:26 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-13 06:38 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:56 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-12 21:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 03:48 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-13 09:40 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-13 16:11 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-13 16:09 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-11-13 22:17 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed (2 knet) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 04:25 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 15:55 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-26 08:55 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 19:27 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 21:24 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:30 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:33 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 10:24 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 11:03 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:28 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-25 16:37 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-26 11:35 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:37 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:46 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:49 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 08:02 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-28 20:45 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-28 22:28 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:06 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-29 09:32 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 17:15 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 14:29 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:44 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 19:18 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:36 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 13:38 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:38 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:46 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:35 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 08:03 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-28 18:44 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 14:50 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-28 10:00 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:57 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 10:02 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-29 18:29 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 15:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-30 06:05 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-30 16:51 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-31 04:39 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:48 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-28 20:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-29 20:53 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-30 18:23 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-31 03:13 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 12:09 -0700
Expansion of the Universe Explained. Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-01 13:45 -0700
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 11:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MsudndjLuLmNAKrLnZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529950 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... > >>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>> lies, >>>>> don't you? >>> >>>>You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>alt.astronomy. >>> >>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >>> to >>> think about it. > >>And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can do >>it again. Or are you that big an idiot? > > You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed radical > Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and > crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up the term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if you look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you what to believe. DUH There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. And I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. Jets don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing down or losing parts but CGIs can. Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a nuke or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of the Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't stop Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST would not. <G> Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the following with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the vaporization range of the deep underground nuke. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 19:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n18c7e$hlt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #529951 |
On 02/11/2015 17:26, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >> >>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>> lies, >>>>>> don't you? >>>> >>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>> >>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >>>> to >>>> think about it. >> >>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can do >>> it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >> >> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed radical >> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? > > Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up the > term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. > > And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if you > look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you what to > believe. DUH Irony alert. > > There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. And > I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. Jets > don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing down > or losing parts but CGIs can. > > Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a nuke > or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? > > The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of the > Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't stop > Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST would > not. <G> > > Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what > Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the following > with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the vaporization > range of the deep underground nuke. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 13:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lfudnVHfiufLIKrLnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529970 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:n18c7e$hlt$1@dont-email.me... > On 02/11/2015 17:26, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> >>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>>> lies, >>>>>>> don't you? >>>>> >>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>>> >>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >>>>> to >>>>> think about it. >>> >>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can >>>> do >>>> it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>> >>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>> radical >>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >> >> Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up the >> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >> >> And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if >> you >> look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you what >> to >> believe. DUH > > Irony alert. Just don't forget, the remains of the Twin Towers can not be a controlled demoltion or a collapse with so much left standing strong. So something had to vaporize the Twin Towers and that something had to vaporize one side of the Twin Towers more than the other and since NIST refused to address the issue of what remained of the Twin Towers that can easily mean it must have been nukes all along. And if it were a nuke or a few nukes then our Government would call it Ground Zero. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. And >> I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. >> Jets >> don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing >> down >> or losing parts but CGIs can. >> >> Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a >> nuke >> or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? >> >> The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of the >> Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't >> stop >> Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST would >> not. <G> >> >> Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what >> Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the following >> with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the >> vaporization >> range of the deep underground nuke. >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n18sf7$lpl$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #529984 |
On 02/11/2015 19:44, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n18c7e$hlt$1@dont-email.me... >> On 02/11/2015 17:26, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> >>>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>>>> lies, >>>>>>>> don't you? >>>>>> >>>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >>>>>> to >>>>>> think about it. >>>> >>>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can >>>>> do >>>>> it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>>> >>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>> radical >>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >>> >>> Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up the >>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >>> >>> And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if >>> you >>> look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you what >>> to >>> believe. DUH >> >> Irony alert. > > Just don't forget, the remains of the Twin Towers can not be a controlled > demoltion But you have told us it was a controlled demolition, do make up your mind, > or a collapse with so much left standing strong. So something had > to vaporize the Twin Towers But they were not 'vapourised', see http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > and that something had to vaporize one side of > the Twin Towers more than the other and since NIST refused to address the > issue of what remained of the Twin Towers that can easily mean it must have > been nukes all along. And if it were a nuke or a few nukes then our > Government would call it Ground Zero. But the media called it ground zero first. > DUH > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > >>> There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. And >>> I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. >>> Jets >>> don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing >>> down >>> or losing parts but CGIs can. >>> >>> Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a >>> nuke >>> or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? >>> >>> The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of the >>> Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't >>> stop >>> Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST would >>> not. <G> >>> >>> Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what >>> Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the following >>> with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the >>> vaporization >>> range of the deep underground nuke. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 16:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XL2dnXgYELr2qaTLnZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530055 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:n18sf7$lpl$2@dont-email.me... > On 02/11/2015 19:44, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:n18c7e$hlt$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 02/11/2015 17:26, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> >>>>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>>>>> lies, >>>>>>>>> don't you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> think about it. >>>>> >>>>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you >>>>>> can >>>>>> do >>>>>> it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>>>> >>>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>>> radical >>>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >>>> >>>> Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up >>>> the >>>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >>>> >>>> And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if >>>> you >>>> look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you >>>> what >>>> to >>>> believe. DUH >>> >>> Irony alert. >> >> Just don't forget, the remains of the Twin Towers can not be a controlled >> demoltion > > But you have told us it was a controlled demolition, do make up your mind, I might have stated Nuclear Controlled Demolition or NCD but there isn't much control with a nuke so changed that to just "Nuclear Demolition" a while ago. Notice when the bottom of the North Tower was vaporized. It was a little late since they had to destroy the top part of the North Tower before the bottom part was vaporized. If the timing of the nuke had been better the crush point would have gone down and up together instead of just up first. BTW you can post your own video of the vaporization of the North Tower since they all show the screwed up timing. >> or a collapse with so much left standing strong. So something had >> to vaporize the Twin Towers > > But they were not 'vapourised', see > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Dude, the part of the Twin Towers that was below the vaporization range of a nuke remained. Everything above it was vaporized unless it managed to fall outside the vaporization range like 3 parts from the South Tower did. And do not forget the top of the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they could crush Stairwell B in the North Tower or the outside walls that stood tall you clown. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> and that something had to vaporize one side of >> the Twin Towers more than the other and since NIST refused to address the >> issue of what remained of the Twin Towers that can easily mean it must >> have >> been nukes all along. And if it were a nuke or a few nukes then our >> Government would call it Ground Zero. > > But the media called it ground zero first. And just who do you think was pulling their strings? And besides, a Crisis Actor/Harley Guy might have called it Ground Zero before anybody else. >> DUH >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> >>>> There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. >>>> And >>>> I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. >>>> Jets >>>> don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing >>>> down >>>> or losing parts but CGIs can. >>>> >>>> Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a >>>> nuke >>>> or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? >>>> >>>> The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of >>>> the >>>> Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't >>>> stop >>>> Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST >>>> would >>>> not. <G> >>>> >>>> Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what >>>> Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the >>>> following >>>> with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the >>>> vaporization >>>> range of the deep underground nuke. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 23:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1bem5$1jr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #530237 |
On 03/11/2015 22:24, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n18sf7$lpl$2@dont-email.me... >> On 02/11/2015 19:44, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:n18c7e$hlt$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 02/11/2015 17:26, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>>>>>> lies, >>>>>>>>>> don't you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>>>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> think about it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> do >>>>>>> it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>>>>> >>>>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>>>> radical >>>>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >>>>> >>>>> Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up >>>>> the >>>>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >>>>> >>>>> And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if >>>>> you >>>>> look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you >>>>> what >>>>> to >>>>> believe. DUH >>>> >>>> Irony alert. >>> >>> Just don't forget, the remains of the Twin Towers can not be a controlled >>> demoltion >> >> But you have told us it was a controlled demolition, do make up your mind, > So you have changed your mind. > I might have stated Nuclear Controlled Demolition or NCD but there isn't > much control with a nuke so changed that to just "Nuclear Demolition" a > while ago. > So these nukes are hard to control, interesting that they did what you aver. > Notice when the bottom of the North Tower was vaporized. It was a little > late since they had to destroy the top part of the North Tower before the > bottom part was vaporized. If the timing of the nuke had been better the > crush point would have gone down and up together instead of just up first. > BTW you can post your own video of the vaporization of the North Tower since > they all show the screwed up timing. > >>> or a collapse with so much left standing strong. So something had >>> to vaporize the Twin Towers >> >> But they were not 'vapourised', see >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Dude, the part of the Twin Towers that was below the vaporization range of a > nuke remained. Everything above it was vaporized unless it managed to fall > outside the vaporization range like 3 parts from the South Tower did. > > And do not forget the top of the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they > could crush Stairwell B in the North Tower or the outside walls that stood > tall you clown. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > >>> and that something had to vaporize one side of >>> the Twin Towers more than the other and since NIST refused to address the >>> issue of what remained of the Twin Towers that can easily mean it must >>> have >>> been nukes all along. And if it were a nuke or a few nukes then our >>> Government would call it Ground Zero. >> >> But the media called it ground zero first. > > And just who do you think was pulling their strings? And besides, a Crisis > Actor/Harley Guy might have called it Ground Zero before anybody else. > > Ah, the crisis actors that you can't give us information about. >>> DUH >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> >>>>> There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. >>>>> And >>>>> I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. >>>>> Jets >>>>> don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing >>>>> down >>>>> or losing parts but CGIs can. >>>>> >>>>> Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a >>>>> nuke >>>>> or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? >>>>> >>>>> The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of >>>>> the >>>>> Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't >>>>> stop >>>>> Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST >>>>> would >>>>> not. <G> >>>>> >>>>> Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what >>>>> Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the >>>>> following >>>>> with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the >>>>> vaporization >>>>> range of the deep underground nuke. >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> Rocky > > How come you saw my post, you said that you never read them, unless I answer some question first. Must just be another lie from you. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n18sfc$lpl$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #529984 |
On 02/11/2015 19:44, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n18c7e$hlt$1@dont-email.me... >> On 02/11/2015 17:26, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> >>>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>>>> lies, >>>>>>>> don't you? >>>>>> >>>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >>>>>> to >>>>>> think about it. >>>> >>>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can >>>>> do >>>>> it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>>> >>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>> radical >>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >>> >>> Yes you certainly are an asshole and I've told you before to look up the >>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >>> >>> And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if >>> you >>> look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you what >>> to >>> believe. DUH >> >> Irony alert. > > Just don't forget, the remains of the Twin Towers can not be a controlled > demoltion or a collapse with so much left standing strong. So something had > to vaporize the Twin Towers and that something had to vaporize one side of > the Twin Towers more than the other and since NIST refused to address the > issue of what remained of the Twin Towers that can easily mean it must have > been nukes all along. And if it were a nuke or a few nukes then our > Government would call it Ground Zero. DUH > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > >>> There are a lot of videos of Nuke York City without any jets at all. And >>> I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. >>> Jets >>> don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing >>> down >>> or losing parts but CGIs can. >>> >>> Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a >>> nuke >>> or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? >>> >>> The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of the >>> Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't >>> stop >>> Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST would >>> not. <G> >>> >>> Again, look at the evidence for yourself because only CGIs can do what >>> Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do and only nukes can leave the following >>> with the far walls standing tall because they were out of the >>> vaporization >>> range of the deep underground nuke. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky > > You said that you didn't read my posts unless I answered a question about NIST. So yet another lie from you. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 06:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n19k2f$bnk$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #529951 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed radical >> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >Yes you certainly are an asshole Why? Because I won't post to a group I don't read and the subject is way off-topic? > and I've told you before to look up the >term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. Umm, no, unfortunately, those were real people. Explain what happened to those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights. I'd love to see you explain to the faces of their families that they were not murdered by those 19 terrorists on those flights. You don't have the balls. >And the only way you will ever know what really happened on 9/11 is if you >look at the evidence for yourself and not let anybody else tell you what to >believe. DUH "Not let anybody else tell you what to believe"? This coming from a sheeple who believes what you are told to believe in those kooksites, and who believes all those kookvids even though you yourself proved that they are all lies? At least baa a little in protest. > And I've already told you what was needed to falsify hundreds of videos. You haven't come up with anything believeable. > Jets >don't fly into buildings above top speed at sea level without slowing down >or losing parts but CGIs can. The jets did slow down. Time the time when the nose entered the building to the time when the first debris exited the north wall of the South Tower when UA 175 hits it. Divide by the 208' side length to get the speed. Now calculate the speed before impact by using the known length of the jet as reference. You'll see the speed is higher before it hits the building than the exiting debris speed. >Plus if there was a reason for the remains of the Twin Towers besides a nuke >or two then why didn't NIST or the 9/11 Commission address it? They didn't investigate a herd of elephants causing the towers to collapse, or space aliens from Pluto using disintegration rays causing the towers to collapse (unfortunately some of you kooktards believe that one) or a single straw breaking the tower's back, or anything else absurd, so why would they address the absurd possibility of a nuke? You proved there were no nukes anyway, using that excellent Duck Test of yours. >The only thing that NIST did that proved they even saw the remains of the >Twin Towers was to quit using the term pancake collapse but that didn't stop >Popular Mechanics because they used that term despite the fact NIST would >not. <G> Progressive collapse. Pancake collapse would be a progressive collapse leaving relatively intact floors stacked. The floors were definitely not intact. >Again, look at the evidence for yourself I did. I learned not only did events happen pretty much as reported, I learned that kooktards could be a whole lot more kooktarded than I ever thought possible. > because only CGIs can do what >Flight 11 and Flight 175 could do But you already proved there were no CGIs, using your "Duck Test"! > and only nukes can leave the following >with the far walls standing tall You proved there were no nukes, too! With the very same "Duck Test"!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kvydnSApiqT7V93LnZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530089 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n19k2f$bnk$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... > >>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>> radical >>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? > >>Yes you certainly are an asshole > > Why? Because I won't post to a group I don't read and the subject is > way off-topic? > >> and I've told you before to look up the >>term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. > > Umm, no, unfortunately, those were real people. Explain what happened to > those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights. > I'd love to see you explain to the faces of their families that they were > not murdered by those 19 terrorists on those flights. You don't have the > balls. DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS and 9/11 was one big psy-op and you would know that if you ever looked at the evidence. You have never been able to explain why there were multiple floor Surviving Corners to both the Twin Towers and all you have said so far is the top of the twin Towers didn't fall straight down when I don't care about the top I care about the 10 floors right above the multiple floor surviving corners. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Don't forget that the only way NIST dealt with the above photo of multiple floor surviving corners is to stop using the term "pancake" in all their tremendous bullshit. But that didn't stop Popular Mechanics from using the term "Pancake" because they didn't make any attempt at all to stick to the truth with their strawman arguments. And for the jets to fly into the Twin Towers without losing any speed or parts means they were either CGIs or the Twin Towers were made out of a material much softer than birds but I doubt the Twin Towers were softer than feathers. 9/11 was clearly the biggest fcukup played on TV but nobody cares. For the damage done to the Twin Towers the jets had to be much stronger than steel and concrete but for the damage done to the Pentagon the jets had to be able to fold their wings back meaning they had to be built differently than the jets that people think flew into the Twin Towers. Not only is there a lack of consistency between the 4 alleged jets used on 9/11 but there is a total lack of consistency between those 4 jets and real jets. Don't forget to those that have seen photos of Pranksville, PA it is has been dubbed the strangest crash of all but to me all 4 jets were very strange since 757 can't fold their wings back in real life and even if the jets in Nuke York City were flying at 3X the speed of sound they should not have fully resembled a CGI flying into a building. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 20:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1quo6$b0b$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531426 |
On 09/11/2015 16:30, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:n19k2f$bnk$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >> >>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>> radical >>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >> >>> Yes you certainly are an asshole >> >> Why? Because I won't post to a group I don't read and the subject is >> way off-topic? >> >>> and I've told you before to look up the >>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >> >> Umm, no, unfortunately, those were real people. Explain what happened to >> those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights. >> I'd love to see you explain to the faces of their families that they were >> not murdered by those 19 terrorists on those flights. You don't have the >> balls. > > DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS and 9/11 was one big psy-op and you > would know that if you ever looked at the evidence. DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS Why don't you answer the questions asked? > > You have never been able to explain why there were multiple floor Surviving > Corners to both the Twin Towers and all you have said so far is the top of > the twin Towers didn't fall straight down when I don't care about the top I > care about the 10 floors right above the multiple floor surviving corners. > <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Don't forget that the only way NIST dealt with the above photo of multiple > floor surviving corners is to stop using the term "pancake" in all their > tremendous bullshit. But that didn't stop Popular Mechanics from using the > term "Pancake" because they didn't make any attempt at all to stick to the > truth with their strawman arguments. > > And for the jets to fly into the Twin Towers without losing any speed or > parts means they were either CGIs or the Twin Towers were made out of a > material much softer than birds but I doubt the Twin Towers were softer than > feathers. > > 9/11 was clearly the biggest fcukup played on TV but nobody cares. For the > damage done to the Twin Towers the jets had to be much stronger than steel > and concrete but for the damage done to the Pentagon the jets had to be able > to fold their wings back meaning they had to be built differently than the > jets that people think flew into the Twin Towers. > > Not only is there a lack of consistency between the 4 alleged jets used on > 9/11 but there is a total lack of consistency between those 4 jets and real > jets. > > Don't forget to those that have seen photos of Pranksville, PA it is has > been dubbed the strangest crash of all but to me all 4 jets were very > strange since 757 can't fold their wings back in real life and even if the > jets in Nuke York City were flying at 3X the speed of sound they should not > have fully resembled a CGI flying into a building. > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 14:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <btidnY5utpBKnNzLnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #531506 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:n1quo6$b0b$3@dont-email.me... > On 09/11/2015 16:30, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:n19k2f$bnk$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>> >>>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>>> radical >>>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >>> >>>> Yes you certainly are an asshole >>> >>> Why? Because I won't post to a group I don't read and the subject is >>> way off-topic? >>> >>>> and I've told you before to look up the >>>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >>> >>> Umm, no, unfortunately, those were real people. Explain what happened >>> to >>> those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights. >>> I'd love to see you explain to the faces of their families that they >>> were >>> not murdered by those 19 terrorists on those flights. You don't have >>> the >>> balls. >> >> DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS and 9/11 was one big psy-op and >> you >> would know that if you ever looked at the evidence. > > > DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS > Why don't you answer the questions asked? You are spining T-annoy. You know damn well I've asked to see the questions you had for NIST or the 9/11 Commission and you have failed to comply. So why should I let you ask questions now when you failed to get any information from NIST before? You should have asked NIST why the remains of the Twin Towers do not resemble a "global collapse" or why the jets in Nuke York City resemble CGIs? http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Oh and if you want to see who and why someone would use CGIs and nukes to get us into war see: Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 22:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1r83k$h14$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531512 |
On 09/11/2015 20:26, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n1quo6$b0b$3@dont-email.me... >> On 09/11/2015 16:30, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n19k2f$bnk$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:n185ev$m4$2@pcls7.std.com... >>>> >>>>>> You deny the fact that nearly 3,000 people were murdered by crazed >>>>>> radical >>>>>> Islamic terrorists, and you deny the fact the innocent passengers and >>>>>> crew aboard the airliners died at all, and you call me an asshole? >>>> >>>>> Yes you certainly are an asshole >>>> >>>> Why? Because I won't post to a group I don't read and the subject is >>>> way off-topic? >>>> >>>>> and I've told you before to look up the >>>>> term VicSim or VicSims because there were a lot of simulated victims. >>>> >>>> Umm, no, unfortunately, those were real people. Explain what happened >>>> to >>>> those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights. >>>> I'd love to see you explain to the faces of their families that they >>>> were >>>> not murdered by those 19 terrorists on those flights. You don't have >>>> the >>>> balls. >>> >>> DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS and 9/11 was one big psy-op and >>> you >>> would know that if you ever looked at the evidence. >> >> >> DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS >> Why don't you answer the questions asked? > > You are spining T-annoy. You know damn well I've asked to see the questions > you had for NIST or the 9/11 Commission and you have failed to comply. So > why should I let you ask questions now when you failed to get any > information from NIST before? > > You should have asked NIST why the remains of the Twin Towers do not > resemble a "global collapse" or why the jets in Nuke York City resemble > CGIs? > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Oh and if you want to see who and why someone would use CGIs and nukes to > get us into war see: > > Revealed; The Men Who Own and Run the U S Government > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwO1onXAaI > > Rooky > > Well first of all I didn't ask the question, I asked you why you wouldn't answer the question. But if you can't answer, that's OK, you usually run away, and you have again. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1ru5t$u3l$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #531426 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n19k2f$bnk$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Umm, no, unfortunately, those were real people. Explain what happened to >> those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights. >> I'd love to see you explain to the faces of their families that they were >> not murdered by those 19 terrorists on those flights. You don't have the >> balls. >DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS Yup. You supply only distractions and won't answer anyone's simple questions. Especially mine. <snip DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS> We were talking about the 246 innocent passengers and crew aboard the airliners, not the kookbabble you keep spewing. I'll ask again: Explain what happened to those 246 innocent passengers and crew who were on those 4 flights.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1arrt$cjm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #529687 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:n13bk4$7dm$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>> >>>>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >>>>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 >>>>> planes. >>>> >>>> Does it tell you how to do that in real time? >>>> >>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of video >>>> cameras throughout Manhattan? >>>> >>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of eyeballs >>>> throughout Manhattan? >>>> >>>>> Theory of Ghosptlane >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc >>>> >>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>> lies, don't you? >> >>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>> alt.astronomy. >> >> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >> to think about it. > > And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can > do it again. Or are you that big an idiot? > >>> She doesn't care to read your brain dead post either or she >>> would. DUH. >> >> I guess not, if she confines herself to an unrelated group. Too bad >> for her. > > Obviously you are the one that thinks calling people a kook or comparing > them to an 8 year old is physics? You are posting garbage and you would > know that if you ever looked at the stuff you throw out when you use > your name-calling. > >>> All you have to do to see that the two jets in Nuke York City were >>> bogus is >>> watch those CGIs melt into the buildings in slow mo. DUH >> >> And you proved, with your awesome Duck Test, that there were no CGIs on >> 9/11 at all, meaning those were real planes. > > But all your bullshit proves is you refuse to see the CGIs in slow > motion because you run and hide from all sorts of facts about 9/11 like > Pranksville. Pranksville was the weirdest crash ever in photos but all > you did was read a story about it without any photos and you think it > was an OK story? Weird. > http://flight93hoax.blogspot.com/ > >> How is your latest "Duck Test", proving that all kooksites are lies, >> coming along? I just can't wait to see that proof! > > You have had the proof right in front of your eyes numerous times but > you close the book and walk away or you just delete the links proving > that the Twin Towers were not a "collapse" and none of the airline > crashes happened in real life because of what WE SAW. > > WE SAW nothing but holes and CGIs and once you subtract all the bullshit > from the Crisis Actors there were no crashed airliners anywhere and no > "collapsed" buildings anywhere either. > > BTW no jets were needed to bring three buildings down at the speed they > came down. <G>. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > And talking about an idiot. The speed that those 3 buildings came down > in Nuke York City proves they were not collapsing buildings because in > real life collapsing buildings come down in sections. You have > obviously never seen a real collapsing building, a real building fire > where the building kept standing or a real jet crash or you would know > that all we were fed about 9/11 was total bullshit. > > Am I right? That you have never seen a real building fire where the > building collapsed in sections? You have never seen a real building > fire where the building kept standing? And you have never seen a real > crash that left black ground and parts all over the place? > > That appears to be your problem Michael is you have no real experiences > to base 9/11 on so the media can lie and lie and lie to you because you > are a total idiot. > > Rocky I am not seeing MORONEY's posts so I'll have to reply though yours. It is an URBAN MYTH that thousands of people in NYC saw or recorded, the alleged passenger planes on 9/11 The majority only looked up to see explosions. But most probably could not even see the explosions, just heard the sound. Some happened to see what looked like small planes with no windows, if they happened to have any view at all and were looking in the right place. What those few described were more like missiles than planes. But as anyone who has actually been in Manhattan could tell you. There are very few places where you can see much of the sky from the ground, due to the buildings that line every street. So it would have been impossible for all these ALLEGED videos to have been taken showing passenger planes clearly marked coming in. The only videos would have been from the tops of a few high rise buildings, or from Jersey or Long Island , and so far away someone with a phone tyoe camera would have only captured a fuzzy dot. Anyone closer would have not even had time to pick up a camera after they saw something flash into view at the last second. I met with people in NYC shortly after 9/11, and TO THIS DAY,...no one person I talked to could tell me that they knew of anyone who saw the planes the governemt fairytale supports. OTHER THAN THOSE WHO SAW IT ON TV.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 15:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Vs2dne9FNqLDuKTLnZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530152 |
<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:504d8f42-d3d9-4036-ae47-ca5d7efc57cd@googlegroups.com... > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-5, Bast wrote: >> Rocky wrote: >> > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> > news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >> >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> >>> news:n13bk4$7dm$1@pcls7.std.com... >> >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >> >>>>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and 9/11 >> >>>>> planes. >> >>>> >> >>>> Does it tell you how to do that in real time? >> >>>> >> >>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of video >> >>>> cameras throughout Manhattan? >> >>>> >> >>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of eyeballs >> >>>> throughout Manhattan? >> >>>> >> >>>>> Theory of Ghosptlane >> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc >> >>>> >> >>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >> >>>> lies, don't you? >> >> >> >>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >> >>> alt.astronomy. >> >> >> >> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even have >> >> to think about it. >> > >> > And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you can >> > do it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >> > >> >>> She doesn't care to read your brain dead post either or she >> >>> would. DUH. >> >> >> >> I guess not, if she confines herself to an unrelated group. Too bad >> >> for her. >> > >> > Obviously you are the one that thinks calling people a kook or >> > comparing >> > them to an 8 year old is physics? You are posting garbage and you >> > would >> > know that if you ever looked at the stuff you throw out when you use >> > your name-calling. >> > >> >>> All you have to do to see that the two jets in Nuke York City were >> >>> bogus is >> >>> watch those CGIs melt into the buildings in slow mo. DUH >> >> >> >> And you proved, with your awesome Duck Test, that there were no CGIs >> >> on >> >> 9/11 at all, meaning those were real planes. >> > >> > But all your bullshit proves is you refuse to see the CGIs in slow >> > motion because you run and hide from all sorts of facts about 9/11 like >> > Pranksville. Pranksville was the weirdest crash ever in photos but all >> > you did was read a story about it without any photos and you think it >> > was an OK story? Weird. >> > http://flight93hoax.blogspot.com/ >> > >> >> How is your latest "Duck Test", proving that all kooksites are lies, >> >> coming along? I just can't wait to see that proof! >> > >> > You have had the proof right in front of your eyes numerous times but >> > you close the book and walk away or you just delete the links proving >> > that the Twin Towers were not a "collapse" and none of the airline >> > crashes happened in real life because of what WE SAW. >> > >> > WE SAW nothing but holes and CGIs and once you subtract all the >> > bullshit >> > from the Crisis Actors there were no crashed airliners anywhere and no >> > "collapsed" buildings anywhere either. >> > >> > BTW no jets were needed to bring three buildings down at the speed they >> > came down. <G>. >> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> > >> > And talking about an idiot. The speed that those 3 buildings came down >> > in Nuke York City proves they were not collapsing buildings because in >> > real life collapsing buildings come down in sections. You have >> > obviously never seen a real collapsing building, a real building fire >> > where the building kept standing or a real jet crash or you would know >> > that all we were fed about 9/11 was total bullshit. >> > >> > Am I right? That you have never seen a real building fire where the >> > building collapsed in sections? You have never seen a real building >> > fire where the building kept standing? And you have never seen a real >> > crash that left black ground and parts all over the place? >> > >> > That appears to be your problem Michael is you have no real experiences >> > to base 9/11 on so the media can lie and lie and lie to you because you >> > are a total idiot. >> > >> > Rocky >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I am not seeing MORONEY's posts so I'll have to reply though yours. >> >> It is an URBAN MYTH that thousands of people in NYC saw or recorded, the >> alleged passenger planes on 9/11 >> The majority only looked up to see explosions. >> But most probably could not even see the explosions, just heard the >> sound. >> >> Some happened to see what looked like small planes with no windows, if >> they >> happened to have any view at all and were looking in the right place. >> What those few described were more like missiles than planes. >> >> But as anyone who has actually been in Manhattan could tell you. >> There are very few places where you can see much of the sky from the >> ground, >> due to the buildings that line every street. >> >> So it would have been impossible for all these ALLEGED videos to have >> been >> taken showing passenger planes clearly marked coming in. >> >> The only videos would have been from the tops of a few high rise >> buildings, >> or from Jersey or Long Island , and so far away someone with a phone >> tyoe >> camera would have only captured a fuzzy dot. >> >> Anyone closer would have not even had time to pick up a camera after they >> saw something flash into view at the last second. >> >> >> I met with people in NYC shortly after 9/11, and TO THIS DAY,...no one >> person I talked to could tell me that they knew of anyone who saw the >> planes >> the governemt fairytale supports. >> OTHER THAN THOSE WHO SAW IT ON TV. > > I lived in NYC for eight years. From lower Manhattan, you could see the > tops of the Towers from quite a ways. Furthermore, in true "rubber > necking" fashion. Quite a few people went TO the Plaza to gawk at the fire > in the first Tower. And I've also talked to people that know people that live in Nuke York City and not too far away from where the Twin Towers were nuked. Fact remains they didn't see any jets either. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Even some of the firefighters there explain that the only reason they think there were jets is from the parts on the ground but I wonder what they would say if they touched one of the parts and found out it didn't have any heat to it and was just a stage prop. And talking about stage props it was just like the downed light poles at the Pentagon were a stage prop. If a jet had really hit the light poles it would have spilled fuel all over the place just like a real jet has done. "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY Rockefeller GLOATS About 9/11 in 1967! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWcARHV71bU Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 21:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n23he4$cqr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #530211 |
Rocky wrote: > <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:504d8f42-d3d9-4036-ae47-ca5d7efc57cd@googlegroups.com... >> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-5, Bast wrote: >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >>>>>> message news:n13bk4$7dm$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >>>>>>>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and >>>>>>>> 9/11 planes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does it tell you how to do that in real time? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of video >>>>>>> cameras throughout Manhattan? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of eyeballs >>>>>>> throughout Manhattan? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Theory of Ghosptlane >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >>>>>>> lies, don't you? >>>>> >>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >>>>>> alt.astronomy. >>>>> >>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even >>>>> have to think about it. >>>> >>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you >>>> can do it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>>> >>>>>> She doesn't care to read your brain dead post either or she >>>>>> would. DUH. >>>>> >>>>> I guess not, if she confines herself to an unrelated group. Too bad >>>>> for her. >>>> >>>> Obviously you are the one that thinks calling people a kook or >>>> comparing >>>> them to an 8 year old is physics? You are posting garbage and you >>>> would >>>> know that if you ever looked at the stuff you throw out when you use >>>> your name-calling. >>>> >>>>>> All you have to do to see that the two jets in Nuke York City were >>>>>> bogus is >>>>>> watch those CGIs melt into the buildings in slow mo. DUH >>>>> >>>>> And you proved, with your awesome Duck Test, that there were no CGIs >>>>> on >>>>> 9/11 at all, meaning those were real planes. >>>> >>>> But all your bullshit proves is you refuse to see the CGIs in slow >>>> motion because you run and hide from all sorts of facts about 9/11 >>>> like Pranksville. Pranksville was the weirdest crash ever in photos >>>> but all you did was read a story about it without any photos and you >>>> think it was an OK story? Weird. >>>> http://flight93hoax.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>>> How is your latest "Duck Test", proving that all kooksites are lies, >>>>> coming along? I just can't wait to see that proof! >>>> >>>> You have had the proof right in front of your eyes numerous times but >>>> you close the book and walk away or you just delete the links proving >>>> that the Twin Towers were not a "collapse" and none of the airline >>>> crashes happened in real life because of what WE SAW. >>>> >>>> WE SAW nothing but holes and CGIs and once you subtract all the >>>> bullshit >>>> from the Crisis Actors there were no crashed airliners anywhere and >>>> no "collapsed" buildings anywhere either. >>>> >>>> BTW no jets were needed to bring three buildings down at the speed >>>> they came down. <G>. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> And talking about an idiot. The speed that those 3 buildings came >>>> down in Nuke York City proves they were not collapsing buildings >>>> because in real life collapsing buildings come down in sections. You >>>> have obviously never seen a real collapsing building, a real >>>> building fire where the building kept standing or a real jet crash >>>> or you would know that all we were fed about 9/11 was total bullshit. >>>> >>>> Am I right? That you have never seen a real building fire where the >>>> building collapsed in sections? You have never seen a real building >>>> fire where the building kept standing? And you have never seen a >>>> real crash that left black ground and parts all over the place? >>>> >>>> That appears to be your problem Michael is you have no real >>>> experiences to base 9/11 on so the media can lie and lie and lie to >>>> you because you are a total idiot. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I am not seeing MORONEY's posts so I'll have to reply though yours. >>> >>> It is an URBAN MYTH that thousands of people in NYC saw or recorded, the >>> alleged passenger planes on 9/11 >>> The majority only looked up to see explosions. >>> But most probably could not even see the explosions, just heard the >>> sound. >>> >>> Some happened to see what looked like small planes with no windows, if >>> they >>> happened to have any view at all and were looking in the right place. >>> What those few described were more like missiles than planes. >>> >>> But as anyone who has actually been in Manhattan could tell you. >>> There are very few places where you can see much of the sky from the >>> ground, >>> due to the buildings that line every street. >>> >>> So it would have been impossible for all these ALLEGED videos to have >>> been >>> taken showing passenger planes clearly marked coming in. >>> >>> The only videos would have been from the tops of a few high rise >>> buildings, >>> or from Jersey or Long Island , and so far away someone with a phone >>> tyoe >>> camera would have only captured a fuzzy dot. >>> >>> Anyone closer would have not even had time to pick up a camera after >>> they saw something flash into view at the last second. >>> >>> >>> I met with people in NYC shortly after 9/11, and TO THIS DAY,...no one >>> person I talked to could tell me that they knew of anyone who saw the >>> planes >>> the governemt fairytale supports. >>> OTHER THAN THOSE WHO SAW IT ON TV. >> >> I lived in NYC for eight years. From lower Manhattan, you could see the >> tops of the Towers from quite a ways. Furthermore, in true "rubber >> necking" fashion. Quite a few people went TO the Plaza to gawk at the >> fire in the first Tower. Make up your mind, if people could see the towers so easily from anywhere,....why would they want to go to the plaza to see it ???? Especially as the fire deptartment would have moved everyone out of there, while they were bringing in equipment trying to put any fires out. As I was in NYC many times, I call bullshit, as I KNOW that from street level in the financial district, you barely could see the towers at all unless you were almost beside them. > > And I've also talked to people that know people that live in Nuke York > City and not too far away from where the Twin Towers were nuked. Fact > remains they didn't see any jets either. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Even some of the firefighters there explain that the only reason they > think there were jets is from the parts on the ground but I wonder what > they would say if they touched one of the parts and found out it didn't > have any heat to it and was just a stage prop. > > And talking about stage props it was just like the downed light poles > at the Pentagon were a stage prop. If a jet had really hit the light > poles it would have spilled fuel all over the place just like a real > jet has done. > "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged > Event " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY > > Rockefeller GLOATS About 9/11 in 1967! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWcARHV71bU > > Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 03:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA550E8C881C40stillnolawsuitedmo@208.90.168.18> |
| In reply to | #532607 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in news:n23he4$cqr$1@dont-email.me: > > > Rocky wrote: >> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:504d8f42-d3d9-4036-ae47-ca5d7efc57cd@googlegroups.com... >>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-5, Bast wrote: >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >>>>> message news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >>>>>>> message news:n13bk4$7dm$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >>>>>>>>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and >>>>>>>>> 9/11 planes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does it tell you how to do that in real time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of video >>>>>>>> cameras throughout Manhattan? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of >>>>>>>> eyeballs throughout Manhattan? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Theory of Ghosptlane >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids >>>>>>>> are lies, don't you? >>>>>> >>>>>>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post >>>>>>> to alt.astronomy. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even >>>>>> have to think about it. >>>>> >>>>> And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so >>>>> you can do it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >>>>> >>>>>>> She doesn't care to read your brain dead post either or she >>>>>>> would. DUH. >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess not, if she confines herself to an unrelated group. Too >>>>>> bad for her. >>>>> >>>>> Obviously you are the one that thinks calling people a kook or >>>>> comparing >>>>> them to an 8 year old is physics? You are posting garbage and you >>>>> would >>>>> know that if you ever looked at the stuff you throw out when you >>>>> use your name-calling. >>>>> >>>>>>> All you have to do to see that the two jets in Nuke York City >>>>>>> were bogus is >>>>>>> watch those CGIs melt into the buildings in slow mo. DUH >>>>>> >>>>>> And you proved, with your awesome Duck Test, that there were no >>>>>> CGIs on >>>>>> 9/11 at all, meaning those were real planes. >>>>> >>>>> But all your bullshit proves is you refuse to see the CGIs in slow >>>>> motion because you run and hide from all sorts of facts about 9/11 >>>>> like Pranksville. Pranksville was the weirdest crash ever in >>>>> photos but all you did was read a story about it without any >>>>> photos and you think it was an OK story? Weird. >>>>> http://flight93hoax.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>>> How is your latest "Duck Test", proving that all kooksites are >>>>>> lies, coming along? I just can't wait to see that proof! >>>>> >>>>> You have had the proof right in front of your eyes numerous times >>>>> but you close the book and walk away or you just delete the links >>>>> proving that the Twin Towers were not a "collapse" and none of the >>>>> airline crashes happened in real life because of what WE SAW. >>>>> >>>>> WE SAW nothing but holes and CGIs and once you subtract all the >>>>> bullshit >>>>> from the Crisis Actors there were no crashed airliners anywhere >>>>> and no "collapsed" buildings anywhere either. >>>>> >>>>> BTW no jets were needed to bring three buildings down at the speed >>>>> they came down. <G>. >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> And talking about an idiot. The speed that those 3 buildings came >>>>> down in Nuke York City proves they were not collapsing buildings >>>>> because in real life collapsing buildings come down in sections. >>>>> You have obviously never seen a real collapsing building, a real >>>>> building fire where the building kept standing or a real jet crash >>>>> or you would know that all we were fed about 9/11 was total >>>>> bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> Am I right? That you have never seen a real building fire where >>>>> the building collapsed in sections? You have never seen a real >>>>> building fire where the building kept standing? And you have >>>>> never seen a real crash that left black ground and parts all over >>>>> the place? >>>>> >>>>> That appears to be your problem Michael is you have no real >>>>> experiences to base 9/11 on so the media can lie and lie and lie >>>>> to you because you are a total idiot. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am not seeing MORONEY's posts so I'll have to reply though yours. >>>> >>>> It is an URBAN MYTH that thousands of people in NYC saw or >>>> recorded, the alleged passenger planes on 9/11 >>>> The majority only looked up to see explosions. >>>> But most probably could not even see the explosions, just heard the >>>> sound. >>>> >>>> Some happened to see what looked like small planes with no windows, >>>> if they >>>> happened to have any view at all and were looking in the right >>>> place. What those few described were more like missiles than >>>> planes. >>>> >>>> But as anyone who has actually been in Manhattan could tell you. >>>> There are very few places where you can see much of the sky from >>>> the ground, >>>> due to the buildings that line every street. >>>> >>>> So it would have been impossible for all these ALLEGED videos to >>>> have been >>>> taken showing passenger planes clearly marked coming in. >>>> >>>> The only videos would have been from the tops of a few high rise >>>> buildings, >>>> or from Jersey or Long Island , and so far away someone with a >>>> phone tyoe >>>> camera would have only captured a fuzzy dot. >>>> >>>> Anyone closer would have not even had time to pick up a camera >>>> after they saw something flash into view at the last second. >>>> >>>> >>>> I met with people in NYC shortly after 9/11, and TO THIS DAY,...no >>>> one person I talked to could tell me that they knew of anyone who >>>> saw the planes >>>> the governemt fairytale supports. >>>> OTHER THAN THOSE WHO SAW IT ON TV. >>> >>> I lived in NYC for eight years. From lower Manhattan, you could see >>> the tops of the Towers from quite a ways. Furthermore, in true >>> "rubber necking" fashion. Quite a few people went TO the Plaza to >>> gawk at the fire in the first Tower. > > Make up your mind, if people could see the towers so easily from > anywhere,....why would they want to go to the plaza to see it ???? > Especially as the fire deptartment would have moved everyone out of > there, while they were bringing in equipment trying to put any fires > out. > > As I was in NYC many times, I call bullshit, as I KNOW that from > street level in the financial district, you barely could see the > towers at all unless you were almost beside them. BZZT! The home office of the company I worked for was across the river at 15 Exchange Place in Jersey City. The Towers could be distinguished easily from there as well as from the street in Manhattan[1]. I could see the WTC from a number of vantages downtown as well as the Village, Chelsea and Alphabet City. They aren't all skyscrapers in that end of Manhattan, especially from the Battery. Y'all rilly, rilly, rilly need to look at the area from a perspecive of a tourist, which I was, only I was paid to do it. How is it possible I know about this? I also used to work for a customer in SoHo in the late 90's and frequented Balduccis in the village for goodies to take home when I flew back to Texas for the weekends. Living out of hotels for months at a time also meant I got to enjoy the night life and tour the area more than the normal commuters who went home every night to the Island or NJ as well as having the occasional weekend "stuck" in Manhattan. BTW, Balducci's made a killer rack of lamb as long as you could put it on an expense account and their later closing was mourned from afar by myself. Also the WTC stuck out prominently from the air, otherwise the jets would have had a harder time finding them. There was no question the buildings were visible from the street, bridges and other points in Manhattan. I could even see them from parts of Clinton/Times Square/Hell's Kitchen. Coincidentally, I was out on the Island when the planes hit. So I got to watch the television coverage and a lot of the employees in Hauppage had relatives and friends who worked downtown. So all that conspiracy crap always made me laugh. I got accounts from the locals who had family, friends and relatives who were *there*. I didn't get to fly home until Thursday the next week. The rental companies would allow you to drive your cars back to our homes that week and weekend but I lived about 1600 driving miles away. So I stayed for the extra week and ended up working from TX half of the time until my assignment was up some months later. I still talk to folks from there. We don't talk about that because there's nothing to talk about at this point. It's settled. Damn, over 14 years later and you kooks can't get the basic facts of the story straight even now. It sure doesn't stop you from prattling on about it still. [1] Let's take Broadway for instance. In case you're wondering if I'm making this up, here's something from me about 16 years ago. My ISP at the time was a small dialup in TX. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/talk.bizarre/wEuUbB- sRGA/cvfQSWuaxlIJ So Bast, I've shown you mine. So show me yours... -- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "My arguments are not defective or fallacious. Learn some logic." - Edmo wins another argument by decree.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 15:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9uOdnS7qddBJuqTLnZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530152 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.30a2e437ed8d535998c3ac@news.giganews.com... > In article <504d8f42-d3d9-4036-ae47-ca5d7efc57cd@googlegroups.com>, > edrhodes@hotmail.com says... >> >> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-5, Bast wrote: >> > Rocky wrote: >> > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> > > news:n13ojk$k3u$1@pcls7.std.com... >> > >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> > >> >> > >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >> > >>> message >> > >>> news:n13bk4$7dm$1@pcls7.std.com... >> > >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Have you seen Rocky's link about " ghost-plane " ? >> > >>>>> You should like it as it shows how they make cartoons,....and >> > >>>>> 9/11 >> > >>>>> planes. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Does it tell you how to do that in real time? >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of video >> > >>>> cameras throughout Manhattan? >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Does it tell you how to get the videos into thousands of eyeballs >> > >>>> throughout Manhattan? >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Theory of Ghosptlane >> > >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc >> > >>>> >> > >>>> You do realize that your buddy Rocky proved all those kookvids are >> > >>>> lies, don't you? >> > >> >> > >>> You obviously don't want bast to see your post or you would post to >> > >>> alt.astronomy. >> > >> >> > >> It's a script, kooktard, it's automatic deletion and I don't even >> > >> have >> > >> to think about it. >> > > >> > > And you are an asshole because you have overridden it before so you >> > > can >> > > do it again. Or are you that big an idiot? >> > > >> > >>> She doesn't care to read your brain dead post either or she >> > >>> would. DUH. >> > >> >> > >> I guess not, if she confines herself to an unrelated group. Too bad >> > >> for her. >> > > >> > > Obviously you are the one that thinks calling people a kook or >> > > comparing >> > > them to an 8 year old is physics? You are posting garbage and you >> > > would >> > > know that if you ever looked at the stuff you throw out when you use >> > > your name-calling. >> > > >> > >>> All you have to do to see that the two jets in Nuke York City were >> > >>> bogus is >> > >>> watch those CGIs melt into the buildings in slow mo. DUH >> > >> >> > >> And you proved, with your awesome Duck Test, that there were no CGIs >> > >> on >> > >> 9/11 at all, meaning those were real planes. >> > > >> > > But all your bullshit proves is you refuse to see the CGIs in slow >> > > motion because you run and hide from all sorts of facts about 9/11 >> > > like >> > > Pranksville. Pranksville was the weirdest crash ever in photos but >> > > all >> > > you did was read a story about it without any photos and you think it >> > > was an OK story? Weird. >> > > http://flight93hoax.blogspot.com/ >> > > >> > >> How is your latest "Duck Test", proving that all kooksites are lies, >> > >> coming along? I just can't wait to see that proof! >> > > >> > > You have had the proof right in front of your eyes numerous times but >> > > you close the book and walk away or you just delete the links proving >> > > that the Twin Towers were not a "collapse" and none of the airline >> > > crashes happened in real life because of what WE SAW. >> > > >> > > WE SAW nothing but holes and CGIs and once you subtract all the >> > > bullshit >> > > from the Crisis Actors there were no crashed airliners anywhere and >> > > no >> > > "collapsed" buildings anywhere either. >> > > >> > > BTW no jets were needed to bring three buildings down at the speed >> > > they >> > > came down. <G>. >> > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> > > >> > > And talking about an idiot. The speed that those 3 buildings came >> > > down >> > > in Nuke York City proves they were not collapsing buildings because >> > > in >> > > real life collapsing buildings come down in sections. You have >> > > obviously never seen a real collapsing building, a real building fire >> > > where the building kept standing or a real jet crash or you would >> > > know >> > > that all we were fed about 9/11 was total bullshit. >> > > >> > > Am I right? That you have never seen a real building fire where the >> > > building collapsed in sections? You have never seen a real building >> > > fire where the building kept standing? And you have never seen a >> > > real >> > > crash that left black ground and parts all over the place? >> > > >> > > That appears to be your problem Michael is you have no real >> > > experiences >> > > to base 9/11 on so the media can lie and lie and lie to you because >> > > you >> > > are a total idiot. >> > > >> > > Rocky >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I am not seeing MORONEY's posts so I'll have to reply though yours. >> > >> > It is an URBAN MYTH that thousands of people in NYC saw or recorded, >> > the >> > alleged passenger planes on 9/11 >> > The majority only looked up to see explosions. >> > But most probably could not even see the explosions, just heard the >> > sound. >> > >> > Some happened to see what looked like small planes with no windows, if >> > they >> > happened to have any view at all and were looking in the right place. >> > What those few described were more like missiles than planes. >> > >> > But as anyone who has actually been in Manhattan could tell you. >> > There are very few places where you can see much of the sky from the >> > ground, >> > due to the buildings that line every street. >> > >> > So it would have been impossible for all these ALLEGED videos to have >> > been >> > taken showing passenger planes clearly marked coming in. >> > >> > The only videos would have been from the tops of a few high rise >> > buildings, >> > or from Jersey or Long Island , and so far away someone with a phone >> > tyoe >> > camera would have only captured a fuzzy dot. >> > >> > Anyone closer would have not even had time to pick up a camera after >> > they >> > saw something flash into view at the last second. >> > >> > >> > I met with people in NYC shortly after 9/11, and TO THIS DAY,...no one >> > person I talked to could tell me that they knew of anyone who saw the >> > planes >> > the governemt fairytale supports. >> > OTHER THAN THOSE WHO SAW IT ON TV. >> >> I lived in NYC for eight years. From lower Manhattan, you could see the >> tops of the Towers from quite a ways. Furthermore, in true "rubber >> necking" fashion. Quite a few people went TO the Plaza to gawk at the >> fire in the first Tower. > > Bast is too stupid to believe. She probably thinks people don't > rubberneck when they pass a wreck on the freeway, too. Anyone who was > able to see the towers was probably watching when the second plane hit. ROTFLMAO because anybody can see plane as day no "second plane hit" because it didn't slow down and it didn't loose any parts in the process making it a CGI instead of a plane. DUH 07 - The Key: https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds And on top of that all the cameras that showed the second CGI also had to be taken off the South Tower ASAP to avoid showing the white smoke from the thermate that was needed to make the roadrunner shaped holes after it was plowed into by a CGI. Plus no jets at all were needed to do this to the Twin Towers: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And do not forget, we know who had to the money and the ability to pull off such a stunt. "Rockefeller Admits The War On Terror Is Bogus And 9/11 Was A Staged Event " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOXOPeIsQTY Rockefeller GLOATS About 9/11 in 1967! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWcARHV71bU Also see: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockefeller+federal+reserve Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-04 16:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VIudncLaRLLdFafLnZ2dnUU7-dOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #530152 |
"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:cd31499d-3430-415e-b54b-fb98325a9da4@googlegroups.com... On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-6, edrh...@hotmail.com wrote: ... > I'm still waiting for evidence that "deep underground nukes" can vaporize > buildings on the surface without breaching and leaving a crater behind. A sensible request that will always be ignored by Rocky. The video compilation of underground nuclear tests clearly shows what every sane person knows: Neither the surface or anything above it are "vaporized" if the explosion fails to breech the surface. Shortly afterwards, there is an enormous subsidence, leaving a crater. Just don't expect Rocky to ever acknowledge it. Dan (Woj...) ======================= And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 Commission has been able to explain why nothing above the 6th floor of Staircase B in WTC1 or nothing above the 8th or 9th floor of the outside wall came down and crushed those areas. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Hell even NIST quit using the term "Pancake" because the following is clearly not the remains of a "Pancake Collapse" or any other type of collapse of that matter. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Even nukes have limitations or they would have easily penetrated the 4 blast doors between where they were detonated and where they were kept. And a certain size nuke could vaporize right up the to alleged impact areas of the Twin Towers. And do not forget the obvious: "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." And given that we were told a ton of lies about the CGIs in Nuke York City that never slowed down or lost parts why wouldn't the USGS and others also lie if they were told it was a matter of National Security or Life and Death? There is a video of the North Tower shaking like a tuning fork before it was vaporized. There is testimony of a guy seeing WTC7 shake before it was partially vaporized. That is SOP for a deep underground nuke. For those that don't know that a nuke can vaporize things but also has a limitation you will just have to wait until the Willis Tower is brought down and they shouldn't have any problems getting permits to destroy the Willis Tower when it is time since it should not be filled with asbestos the way the Twin Towers were. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 07:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1eurp$q9r$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #530416 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >news:cd31499d-3430-415e-b54b-fb98325a9da4@googlegroups.com... >On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-6, edrh...@hotmail.com wrote: >... >> I'm still waiting for evidence that "deep underground nukes" can vaporize >> buildings on the surface without breaching and leaving a crater behind. >A sensible request that will always be ignored by Rocky. The video >compilation of underground nuclear tests clearly shows what every sane >person knows: Neither the surface or anything above it are "vaporized" if >the explosion fails to breech the surface. Shortly afterwards, there is an >enormous subsidence, leaving a crater. >Just don't expect Rocky to ever acknowledge it. >Dan (Woj...) >======================= >And you are both forgetting that nobody including NIST or the 9/11 <snip dozens of lines of evasion> So tell him, how can a nuke vaporize a building if it doesn't breach the ground? And if it did breach the ground, where was the million degree fireball? Where was the 12,000' mushroom cloud? Where was the crater? And I am still waiting for you to show me another example of a "Nuclear Demolition" so I can compare it to that copy of the Sept. 17, 2001 NOAA image of the massive debris that has the kookscribbles added. You know, the one you always link to as blast3.jpeg. >And do not forget the obvious: "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever >remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." So, since your "Duck Test" shows that nukes on 9/11 were impossible, the improbable collapses of steel frame buildings due to massive fires, three times in one day, must be the truth. Another genius proof by Rocky!! He proves massive fires caused the collapses of all three towers of the World Trade Center!! Shall we call it the "Sherlock Holmes" proof? That's our Rocky, as clever as the legendary Sherlock Holmes at solving the 9/11 mystery!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web