Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #528008 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-24 23:07 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-11-01 13:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 113 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 23:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 07:09 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-25 06:03 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-25 09:59 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:05 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 18:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 22:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:16 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 10:15 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 16:18 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 15:21 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:14 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 19:24 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:31 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 20:00 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 03:21 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-01 09:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 14:27 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 20:45 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 14:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:09 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 17:12 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 12:22 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 14:36 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 13:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:57 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:15 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-26 11:32 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 10:57 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:36 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-26 13:41 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-31 15:05 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:14 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-31 21:25 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-31 19:12 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-01 01:07 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 07:58 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-02 17:10 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 11:26 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-02 19:08 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 13:44 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-01 20:30 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 19:52 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-11-02 13:53 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:59 -0800
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-02 13:29 -0600
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 15:55 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-26 08:55 -0700
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 19:27 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 21:24 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:30 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:33 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 10:24 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:07 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 11:03 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:28 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-25 16:37 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-26 11:35 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:37 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:41 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:46 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:49 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 08:02 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-28 20:45 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-28 22:28 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:06 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-29 09:32 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 17:15 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 14:29 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:44 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 19:18 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:36 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 13:38 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:38 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:46 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-26 10:35 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-27 08:03 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-28 18:44 -0400
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 14:50 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-28 10:00 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 15:57 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 10:02 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-29 18:29 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-29 15:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-30 06:05 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-30 16:51 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-31 04:39 +0100
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:48 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-28 20:09 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-29 20:53 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-30 18:23 -0500
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-31 03:13 +0000
Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 12:09 -0700
Expansion of the Universe Explained. Re: 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-01 13:45 -0700
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 14:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0j6v6$59o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528048 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 25/10/2015 16:09, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:n0inni$s1r$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 25/10/2015 12:09, Rocky wrote: >>>> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:1f7e8363-eefd-4622-8f54-82c6074c3f73@googlegroups.com... >>>>> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 4:09:00 AM UTC, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:n0hfg4$kja$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> >>>>>> 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKgrx52XrCU >>>>>> >>>>>> ================= >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow, what a great video and I wish they had used more quotes from >>>>>> the Harley >>>>>> Guy because he also called the World Trade Center "Ground Zero" so >>>>>> where >>>>>> was >>>>>> he getting is BS from. >>>>>> >>>>>> And then look at NIST because basically all they did was expand on >>>>>> the bullshit we got from the Harley Guy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> First the film uses the term 'experts' to indicate that they were >>>>> not experts, note this expert did not mention disappearing wings >>>>> (none was visible) opr the sound of a nuclear explosion. >>>>> >>>>> So a bystander who 'SAW' the plane hit said the collapse was due to >>>>> structural failure, the building fell down, therefor the structure >>>>> failed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Where did he get this all from", well what he said sounds logical >>>>> to me, >>>>> planes impact, fuel. >>>>> >>>>> "why does he change the subject" >>>>> Because he is commenting on the overall incident & on the news video >>>>> gathered >>>>> >>>>> Why does he use the emotional buzzwords? >>>>> Why not, he used words that reflected how he felt. >>>>> >>>>> Then an expert is asked to give his opinion of O B L & he tells >>>>> what his intelligence suspects, looks like he is doing his job. >>>>> >>>>> "Think about it", I have, seems like a normal fast put together news >>>>> feed >>>>> to me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Who is this guy?", he is somebody who saw the planes hit the >>>>> buildings. "Everbody else was in shock", that was because they >>>>> 'SAW' the planes hit the buildings. >>>> >>>> Crisis Actors are paid to say what their script tells them to say. Duh. >>>> Walsh - Harley Guy - Pugh - Who's Who? >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhaBgOPEIM >>>> >>>> And when the jets in Nuke York City are viewed in slow motion why do >>>> they suddenly look like CGIs instead? >>>> >>>> Conclusive Evidence the 9/11 Planes were NOT REAL >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were >>> actors. Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these >>> 'crisis >>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or actors >>> name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in that >>> company. >> >> Google is your friend. See: >> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors >> >> Rocky >> >> > > I asked for the company, not a search link. > Why would you think any of us would have a terrorist phone book on our speed-dials ? None of us "truthers" work for the CIA. Or any other paid mercenary agency. If we did, we could knock your socks off with the evidence, and would probably already be calling Guantanimo Bay (Or Russia), home. But maybe if you are nice, Snowden will show up with your list.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5dmq2bl3bonja7hunmsr3oci66ida6ptvf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528056 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:29:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were
>>>> actors. Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these
>>>> 'crisis
>>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or actors
>>>> name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in that
>>>> company.
>>>
>>> Google is your friend. See:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>
>> I asked for the company, not a search link.
>
>
>Why would you think any of us would have a terrorist phone book on our
>speed-dials ?
>None of us "truthers" work for the CIA. Or any other paid mercenary agency.
>
>If we did, we could knock your socks off with the evidence, and would
>probably already be calling Guantanimo Bay (Or Russia), home.
>
>But maybe if you are nice, Snowden will show up with your list.
So once again the lack of proof IS the proof, eh?
By that logic, it was a herd of elephants that brought down the
Twin Towers and #7. There is no proof of this, so, by your logic, it's
been proved.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 19:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jpct$1ap$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528101 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:29:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > [...] > >>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were >>>>> actors. Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these >>>>> 'crisis >>>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or >>>>> actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in >>>>> that company. >>>> >>>> Google is your friend. See: >>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>> >>> I asked for the company, not a search link. >> >> >> Why would you think any of us would have a terrorist phone book on our >> speed-dials ? >> None of us "truthers" work for the CIA. Or any other paid mercenary >> agency. >> >> If we did, we could knock your socks off with the evidence, and would >> probably already be calling Guantanimo Bay (Or Russia), home. >> >> But maybe if you are nice, Snowden will show up with your list. > > So once again the lack of proof IS the proof, eh? > By that logic, it was a herd of elephants that brought down the > Twin Towers and #7. There is no proof of this, so, by your logic, it's > been proved. I would buy THAT story about the elephants, a lot easier than the offical fairytalle they keep trying to sell us. ....What pilot wouldn't turn over their plane if a herd of elephants with box cutters, came into the cabin mid-flight ? So THAT,....I could almost believe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o3qr2bp6k2ssao3t1fvk4o36cghr77v9f6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528120 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:44:30 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:29:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were
>>>>>> actors. Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these
>>>>>> 'crisis
>>>>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or
>>>>>> actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in
>>>>>> that company.
>>>>>
>>>>> Google is your friend. See:
>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I asked for the company, not a search link.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why would you think any of us would have a terrorist phone book on our
>>> speed-dials ?
>>> None of us "truthers" work for the CIA. Or any other paid mercenary
>>> agency.
>>>
>>> If we did, we could knock your socks off with the evidence, and would
>>> probably already be calling Guantanimo Bay (Or Russia), home.
>>>
>>> But maybe if you are nice, Snowden will show up with your list.
>>
>> So once again the lack of proof IS the proof, eh?
>> By that logic, it was a herd of elephants that brought down the
>> Twin Towers and #7. There is no proof of this, so, by your logic, it's
>> been proved.
>
>
>I would buy THAT story about the elephants, a lot easier than the offical
>fairytalle they keep trying to sell us.
By the very standards you hold, it's been proved.
>
>....What pilot wouldn't turn over their plane if a herd of elephants with
>box cutters, came into the cabin mid-flight ?
>So THAT,....I could almost believe.
Who said anything about these elephants taking over a plane?
Interesting... How deeply involved are you with the 9/11 Elephant
Conspiracy?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 19:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0mc7j$7e7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528195 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:44:30 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:29:59 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were >>>>>>> actors. Can you give me the name of the company that hires out >>>>>>> these 'crisis >>>>>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or >>>>>>> actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares >>>>>>> in that company. >>>>>> >>>>>> Google is your friend. See: >>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I asked for the company, not a search link. >>>> >>>> >>>> Why would you think any of us would have a terrorist phone book on >>>> our speed-dials ? >>>> None of us "truthers" work for the CIA. Or any other paid mercenary >>>> agency. >>>> >>>> If we did, we could knock your socks off with the evidence, and would >>>> probably already be calling Guantanimo Bay (Or Russia), home. >>>> >>>> But maybe if you are nice, Snowden will show up with your list. >>> >>> So once again the lack of proof IS the proof, eh? >>> By that logic, it was a herd of elephants that brought down the >>> Twin Towers and #7. There is no proof of this, so, by your logic, it's >>> been proved. >> >> >> I would buy THAT story about the elephants, a lot easier than the >> offical fairytalle they keep trying to sell us. > > By the very standards you hold, it's been proved. > >> >> ....What pilot wouldn't turn over their plane if a herd of elephants >> with box cutters, came into the cabin mid-flight ? >> So THAT,....I could almost believe. > > Who said anything about these elephants taking over a plane? > Interesting... How deeply involved are you with the 9/11 Elephant > Conspiracy? But it wasn't elephants. It was hippos,...in elephant suits. ....Never did trust them hippos, and their beady eyes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rbmq2b5udnkgdkjd6tf54cefj366c1ub08@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528048 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:12:39 +0000, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>> And when the jets in Nuke York City are viewed in slow motion why do they
>>>> suddenly look like CGIs instead?
>>>>
>>>> Conclusive Evidence the 9/11 Planes were NOT REAL
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>
>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were actors.
>>>
>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these 'crisis
>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or actors
>>> name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in that company.
>>
>> Google is your friend. See:
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hires+crisis+actors
>>
>>
>
>I asked for the company, not a search link.
Note that not one company is listed as representing these
fictional crisis actors. There are a lot of blogs and such wherein the
claim such actors were used is made. You'll notice none offer any
actual evidence.
The closest they can get is three different women they claim are
the same person. "But they all have long brown hair. And they're all
thin."
This is what constitutes evidence in the mind of a Troofer k00k
like Rocky.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 13:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0j3v0$kth$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528042 |
Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n0inni$s1r$2@dont-email.me... >> On 25/10/2015 12:09, Rocky wrote: >>> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:1f7e8363-eefd-4622-8f54-82c6074c3f73@googlegroups.com... >>>> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 4:09:00 AM UTC, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:n0hfg4$kja$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> >>>>> 9 |11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKgrx52XrCU >>>>> >>>>> ================= >>>>> >>>>> Wow, what a great video and I wish they had used more quotes from >>>>> the Harley >>>>> Guy because he also called the World Trade Center "Ground Zero" so >>>>> where >>>>> was >>>>> he getting is BS from. >>>>> >>>>> And then look at NIST because basically all they did was expand on >>>>> the bullshit we got from the Harley Guy. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> First the film uses the term 'experts' to indicate that they were not >>>> experts, note this expert did not mention disappearing wings (none >>>> was visible) opr the sound of a nuclear explosion. >>>> >>>> So a bystander who 'SAW' the plane hit said the collapse was due to >>>> structural failure, the building fell down, therefor the structure >>>> failed. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Where did he get this all from", well what he said sounds logical to >>>> me, >>>> planes impact, fuel. >>>> >>>> "why does he change the subject" >>>> Because he is commenting on the overall incident & on the news video >>>> gathered >>>> >>>> Why does he use the emotional buzzwords? >>>> Why not, he used words that reflected how he felt. >>>> >>>> Then an expert is asked to give his opinion of O B L & he tells what >>>> his intelligence suspects, looks like he is doing his job. >>>> >>>> "Think about it", I have, seems like a normal fast put together news >>>> feed >>>> to me. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Who is this guy?", he is somebody who saw the planes hit the >>>> buildings. "Everbody else was in shock", that was because they 'SAW' >>>> the planes hit the buildings. >>> >>> Crisis Actors are paid to say what their script tells them to say. Duh. >>> Walsh - Harley Guy - Pugh - Who's Who? >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhaBgOPEIM >>> >>> And when the jets in Nuke York City are viewed in slow motion why do >>> they suddenly look like CGIs instead? >>> >>> Conclusive Evidence the 9/11 Planes were NOT REAL >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >> >> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were actors. >> >> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these 'crisis >> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or actors >> name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in that >> company. I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire one of these guys myself You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm sure someone will get back to you http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9&
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <udmq2bhgkngp759bukn9thug1ojkes1v1h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528052 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were actors.
>>>
>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these 'crisis
>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or actors
>>> name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in that
>>> company.
>
>
>I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire one of
>these guys myself
>You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm sure someone
>will get back to you
>
>http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9&
No company is listed at the site.
Do you think your lying is helping?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 19:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jpgd$1k1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528102 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > [...] > >>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were >>>> actors. >>>> >>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these 'crisis >>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or >>>> actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in >>>> that company. >> >> >> I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire one of >> these guys myself >> You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm sure >> someone will get back to you >> >> http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9& > > No company is listed at the site. > Do you think your lying is helping? ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 03:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <94qr2blarobpc1hr9vmdupoiab76rm3b57@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528121 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:46:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were
>>>>> actors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these 'crisis
>>>>> actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company name or
>>>>> actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy shares in
>>>>> that company.
>>>
>>> I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire one of
>>> these guys myself
>>> You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm sure
>>> someone will get back to you
>>>
>>> http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9&
>>
>> No company is listed at the site.
>> Do you think your lying is helping?
>
>
>
>......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants
>
Still no companies listed.
Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about
crisis actors. Good job!
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 10:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0ldj4$16u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528196 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:46:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were >>>>>> actors. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these >>>>>> 'crisis actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company >>>>>> name or actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy >>>>>> shares in that company. >>>> >>>> I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire one >>>> of these guys myself >>>> You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm sure >>>> someone will get back to you >>>> >>>> http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9& >>> >>> No company is listed at the site. >>> Do you think your lying is helping? >> >> >> >> ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants >> > > Still no companies listed. > Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about > crisis actors. Good job! I fail to understand why my poking fun at your pathetic attempts to create strawmen, is having any effect on Roger's credibility Other that he and others are laughing so hard, he can't type.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 03:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <07cu2b5mcjr1mv0nvmitsb3uuq9t8t5u5o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528202 |
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:35:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:46:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were
>>>>>>> actors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these
>>>>>>> 'crisis actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company
>>>>>>> name or actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy
>>>>>>> shares in that company.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire one
>>>>> of these guys myself
>>>>> You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm sure
>>>>> someone will get back to you
>>>>>
>>>>> http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9&
>>>>
>>>> No company is listed at the site.
>>>> Do you think your lying is helping?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants
>>
>> Still no companies listed.
>> Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about
>> crisis actors. Good job!
>
>
>I fail to understand why my poking fun at your pathetic attempts to create
>strawmen, is having any effect on Roger's credibility
I offer no straw men, so that lie has failed you.
Since Roger has NO credibility, your point about not having an
effect on it is valid.
>Other that he and others are laughing so hard, he can't type.
The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that
all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet
he continues to act like he hasn't.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 08:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0np3a$3hs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #528444 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:35:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:46:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>>>> So the other eyewitnesses that the film says were in shock were >>>>>>>> actors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you give me the name of the company that hires out these >>>>>>>> 'crisis actors' as nobody has been able to find out the company >>>>>>>> name or actors name, they must be very good, perhaps I should buy >>>>>>>> shares in that company. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm glad to help when possible. But I rarely ever needed to hire >>>>>> one of these guys myself >>>>>> You can post your request here, with your contact info, and I'm >>>>>> sure someone will get back to you >>>>>> >>>>>> http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-wtc-actors-t24998.html?s=d2ed14c58db6d6b15dcf1da0132b51b9& >>>>> >>>>> No company is listed at the site. >>>>> Do you think your lying is helping? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants >>> >>> Still no companies listed. >>> Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about >>> crisis actors. Good job! >> >> >> I fail to understand why my poking fun at your pathetic attempts to >> create strawmen, is having any effect on Roger's credibility > > I offer no straw men, so that lie has failed you. > Since Roger has NO credibility, your point about not having an > effect on it is valid. > >> Other that he and others are laughing so hard, he can't type. > > The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that > all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet > he continues to act like he hasn't. You sir,.....Are a MORON
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nn113b1r9vc27lsbu5ec2c5p03q9tu6jek@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528456 |
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:03:56 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>>>> ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants
>>>>
>>>> Still no companies listed.
>>>> Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about
>>>> crisis actors. Good job!
>>>
>>>
>>> I fail to understand why my poking fun at your pathetic attempts to
>>> create strawmen, is having any effect on Roger's credibility
>>
>> I offer no straw men, so that lie has failed you.
>> Since Roger has NO credibility, your point about not having an
>> effect on it is valid.
>>
>>> Other that he and others are laughing so hard, he can't type.
>>
>> The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that
>> all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet
>> he continues to act like he hasn't.
>
>
>
>
>
>You sir,.....Are a MORON
And yet, you consistently PROVE I am your intellectual superior.
If my being intellectually superior to you makes me a moron, how much
worse do you see yourself?
This is a very serious question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 18:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.309b19da3a9c1ea198c398@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #528676 |
In article <nn113b1r9vc27lsbu5ec2c5p03q9tu6jek@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:03:56 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > [...] > > >>>>> ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants > >>>> > >>>> Still no companies listed. > >>>> Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about > >>>> crisis actors. Good job! > >>> > >>> > >>> I fail to understand why my poking fun at your pathetic attempts to > >>> create strawmen, is having any effect on Roger's credibility > >> > >> I offer no straw men, so that lie has failed you. > >> Since Roger has NO credibility, your point about not having an > >> effect on it is valid. > >> > >>> Other that he and others are laughing so hard, he can't type. > >> > >> The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that > >> all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet > >> he continues to act like he hasn't. > > > > > > > > > > > >You sir,.....Are a MORON > > And yet, you consistently PROVE I am your intellectual superior. > If my being intellectually superior to you makes me a moron, how much > worse do you see yourself? > This is a very serious question. Don't get a swelled head, a Garden Slug is Bast's intellectual superior. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 04:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m7o33b1no0lst3saf3v92mvog2j7u7cop1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #528812 |
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:44:33 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <nn113b1r9vc27lsbu5ec2c5p03q9tu6jek@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:03:56 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >>>>> ......Try doing a search for terrorist elephants
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Still no companies listed.
>> >>>> Once again you draw more focus on the fact that Roger LIED about
>> >>>> crisis actors. Good job!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I fail to understand why my poking fun at your pathetic attempts to
>> >>> create strawmen, is having any effect on Roger's credibility
>> >>
>> >> I offer no straw men, so that lie has failed you.
>> >> Since Roger has NO credibility, your point about not having an
>> >> effect on it is valid.
>> >>
>> >>> Other that he and others are laughing so hard, he can't type.
>> >>
>> >> The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that
>> >> all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet
>> >> he continues to act like he hasn't.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >You sir,.....Are a MORON
>>
>> And yet, you consistently PROVE I am your intellectual superior.
>> If my being intellectually superior to you makes me a moron, how much
>> worse do you see yourself?
>> This is a very serious question.
>
>Don't get a swelled head, a Garden Slug is Bast's intellectual superior.
True enough.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 14:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0qnbn$8pt$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #528456 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that >> all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet >> he continues to act like he hasn't. >You sir,.....Are a MORON But it's true! Rocky proved there were no CGIs, no nukes used on 9/11 and that all 9/11 k00kvids are lies. He was such a genius to apply the "Duck Test" to make these proofs. You must be very proud of him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 10:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aN-dnSbWjcFyf63LnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #528711 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n0qnbn$8pt$3@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>> The problem is Roger has PROVED there were no nukes used, that >>> all the 9/11 k00k videos are lies and that Troofers are all liars. Yet >>> he continues to act like he hasn't. > >>You sir,.....Are a MORON > > But it's true! Rocky proved there were no CGIs, no nukes used on 9/11 and > that all 9/11 k00kvids are lies. He was such a genius to apply the "Duck > Test" to make these proofs. You must be very proud of him. ROTFLMAO because that coming from someone that thinks there were any airline crashes on 9/11/01 proves they are off their rocker to start with. BTW I'm still waiting for you to explain what happened to the great big radio tower that was on the top of the North Tower. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 15:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0qra5$dgu$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #528712 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n0qnbn$8pt$3@pcls7.std.com... >> But it's true! Rocky proved there were no CGIs, no nukes used on 9/11 and >> that all 9/11 k00kvids are lies. He was such a genius to apply the "Duck >> Test" to make these proofs. You must be very proud of him. >BTW I'm still waiting for you to explain what happened to the great big >radio tower that was on the top of the North Tower. Diversion noted. We're discussing how your genius in using the "Duck Test" proved once and for all that no CGIs and no nukes were used on 9/11, and how you proved that every single k00kvid is a great big lie, not how some flimsy radio tower got pulverized just like nearly everything else did. So, do you have any additional Duck Comparisons to further prove that no CGIs or nukes were used on 9/11? Let's add them to the list!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 10:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0eidncZgyNBlqa_LnZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #528719 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:n0qra5$dgu$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:n0qnbn$8pt$3@pcls7.std.com... > >>> But it's true! Rocky proved there were no CGIs, no nukes used on 9/11 >>> and >>> that all 9/11 k00kvids are lies. He was such a genius to apply the >>> "Duck >>> Test" to make these proofs. You must be very proud of him. > >>BTW I'm still waiting for you to explain what happened to the great big >>radio tower that was on the top of the North Tower. > > Diversion noted. We're discussing how your genius in using the "Duck > Test" proved once and for all that no CGIs and no nukes were used on 9/11, > and how you proved that every single k00kvid is a great big lie, not how > some flimsy radio tower got pulverized just like nearly everything else > did. > > So, do you have any additional Duck Comparisons to further prove that no > CGIs or nukes were used on 9/11? Let's add them to the list! ROTFLMAO because CGIs and NUKES come a lot closer to passing the Duck Test than your skipping jets with the disappearing wings and the complete lack of crash dynamics and the two building that fell into piles of rubble much much smaller than a building less than half it's size. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg In other words the Official story doesn't even come close to passing the Duck test. It is pretty funny that the lack of videos and photos of the Pentagon and Pranksville, PA help prove there were no jets there but it is the videos of Nuke York City that helps prove there were no jets there either. And do not forget that Panksville, PA has been tagged the strangest crash of a jet ever. <G> The Flight 93 Hoax - Strangest Plane Crash Ever http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2011/02/the-flight-93-hoax-strangest-plane-crash-ever-391827.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web