Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #527256 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof!

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:51 -0500
    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 20:07 -0400
      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> - 2015-10-21 20:22 -0400
        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 11:33 +1100
          Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> - 2015-10-21 21:02 -0400
            Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 12:20 +1100
              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 07:49 -0700
                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:57 -0400
                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:06 -0500
                  Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 19:19 -0700
                    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:28 -0500
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 06:02 -0400
                        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-23 09:10 -0700
                          Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:43 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:43 -0500
                          Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 20:30 -0400
                            Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 23:22 -0400
                              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-24 07:03 -0400
                                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-24 10:10 -0400
                                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 15:04 -0500
                            Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 03:58 -0500
                              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-24 07:22 -0400
                                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-24 10:05 -0400
                                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 15:04 -0500
            Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:22 -0400
              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 09:46 -0700
              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 07:03 +1100
                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:09 -0400
                  Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 23:06 +0100
                    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 17:30 -0500
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 23:38 +0100
                    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:06 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:23 -0400
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 06:38 +0100
                        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:05 -0400
                          Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 18:16 +0100
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:37 -0400
                  Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:06 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:00 +1100
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 10:26 -0400
                  Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:09 -0400
                    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-23 15:44 +0000
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 12:21 -0400
                      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:37 -0700
                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:34 -0400
          Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 21:11 -0400
            Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 12:22 +1100
              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:23 -0400
                Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 10:15 -0400
                  Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:35 -0400
              Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 08:57 -0400
            Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:23 -0400
        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:21 -0400
        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:16 -0500
        Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 11:18 -0500
      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 11:24 -0500
      Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 15:31 +0000
    Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-23 09:21 -0700

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#527637

In article <n0bj6s$ctr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> Government Shill #2 wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:22:12 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:02:39 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Government Shill #2 wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the
> >>>>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused
> >>>>> the side to collapse. "
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no
> >>>>> plane ", ANYWHERE.
> >>>>
> >>>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side
> >>>> of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
> >>>>
> >>>> Right there, in your quote.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
> >>>>
> >>>> Shill #2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Are you EVER a dumb cunt.
> >>
> >> Hi Bast.
> >>
> >>> Editing my post does not impress anyone.
> >>> Nor deleting the link to the video, so that others can easily judge
> >>> for themselves
> >>>
> >>>>> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
> >>>
> >>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the
> >>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused
> >>> the side to collapse. "
> >>>
> >>> How stupid can you be  ?
> >>
> >> " the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then
> >> caused the side to collapse. "
> >>
> >>
> >>> Everyone else has known for years that 9/11 was a false flag..
> >>>
> >>> And for both this account and that "sarah" should stop posting from
> >>> the same IP,
> >>
> >> We don't have the same IP Bast.   We're not even in the same time
> >> zones, you loopy lesbian.
> >
> > We're not even in the same continent or hemisphere. :-)
> >
> > Shill #2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What are you flapping your paranoid gums about ?
> Arc Michael has me figured out as Rocky and saul and a few others,....
> Jeez,....
> 
> Most of the world now accepts that 9/11 was an inside job.

Only in your delusions.

> So your side is not doing your jobs at all. And it's only a matter of time 
> until you get terminated by your bosses.

We do this purely for amusement.

> They didn't lose any sleep over snuffing out 3000 people on 9/11, and 
> millions since, so your pathetic existence doesn't even count at all

Your delusions about 911 are endlessly fascinating..

There are a lot of dopey people in the world, but not all that many that 
are stupid enough to fall for Troofery. It takes the dopiest of dopes, 
and the most ignorant of ignoramouses to fall for that.

That's why you are a true believer.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527653

BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes:

>In article <n0bj6s$ctr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...

>> Most of the world now accepts that 9/11 was an inside job.

>Only in your delusions.

>> So your side is not doing your jobs at all. And it's only a matter of time 
>> until you get terminated by your bosses.

>We do this purely for amusement.

Yup!  K=EA=99=A8=EA=99=A8ktards are so entertaining!!

>> They didn't lose any sleep over snuffing out 3000 people on 9/11, and 
>> millions since, so your pathetic existence doesn't even count at all

>Your delusions about 911 are endlessly fascinating..

I've always been fascinated by all the abnormal psychology that 
sci.physics attracts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527667

In article <n0dkk4$sm2$2@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com 
says...
> 
> BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes:
> 
> >In article <n0bj6s$ctr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> >> Most of the world now accepts that 9/11 was an inside job.
> 
> >Only in your delusions.
> 
> >> So your side is not doing your jobs at all. And it's only a matter of time 
> >> until you get terminated by your bosses.
> 
> >We do this purely for amusement.
> 
> Yup!  K=EA=99=A8=EA=99=A8ktards are so entertaining!!
> 
> >> They didn't lose any sleep over snuffing out 3000 people on 9/11, and 
> >> millions since, so your pathetic existence doesn't even count at all
> 
> >Your delusions about 911 are endlessly fascinating..
> 
> I've always been fascinated by all the abnormal psychology that 
> sci.physics attracts.

The ego tripping is what gets me. They actually think they are important 
enough that there are people paid to "block" their getting the word out 
about Troofery.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527671

On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 11:44:07 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> writes:
> 
> >In article <n0bj6s$ctr$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> >> Most of the world now accepts that 9/11 was an inside job.
> 
> >Only in your delusions.
> 
> >> So your side is not doing your jobs at all. And it's only a matter of time 
> >> until you get terminated by your bosses.
> 
> >We do this purely for amusement.
> 
> Yup!  K=EA=99=A8=EA=99=A8ktards are so entertaining!!
> 
> >> They didn't lose any sleep over snuffing out 3000 people on 9/11, and 
> >> millions since, so your pathetic existence doesn't even count at all
> 
> >Your delusions about 911 are endlessly fascinating..
> 
> I've always been fascinated by all the abnormal psychology that 
> sci.physics attracts.

You two are here.

-- Mahipal

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527760

On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:03:54 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:22:12 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:02:39 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Government Shill #2 wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>>>>>
>>>>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the
>>>>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the
>>>>> side to collapse. "
>>>>>
>>>>> Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ",
>>>>> ANYWHERE.
>>>>
>>>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side
>>>> of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
>>>>
>>>> Right there, in your quote.
>>>>
>>>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
>>>>
>>>> Shill #2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Are you EVER a dumb cunt.
>>
>>Hi Bast.  
>>
>>>Editing my post does not impress anyone.
>>>Nor deleting the link to the video, so that others can easily judge for 
>>>themselves
>>>
>>>>> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
>>>
>>>" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire
>>>plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to
>>>collapse. "
>>>
>>>How stupid can you be  ?
>>
>>" the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then
>>caused the side to collapse. "
>>
>>
>>>Everyone else has known for years that 9/11 was a false flag..
>>>
>>>And for both this account and that "sarah" should stop posting from the same 
>>>IP, 
>>
>>We don't have the same IP Bast.   We're not even in the same time
>>zones, you loopy lesbian.  
>
>We're not even in the same continent or hemisphere. :-)

Yes, that's true too!   :)

>Shill #2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527341

In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>, 
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> wrote:
> 
> >What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
> >
> >" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
> >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
> >collapse. "
> >
> >Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
> >ANYWHERE.
> 
> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
> Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
> 
> Right there, in your quote.
> 
> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
> 
> Shill #2

It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not 
understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527344

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:

>In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>, 
>gov.shill@gmail.com says...
>> 
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> wrote:
>> 
>> >What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>> >
>> >" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
>> >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
>> >collapse. "
>> >
>> >Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
>> >ANYWHERE.
>> 
>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
>> Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
>> 
>> Right there, in your quote.
>> 
>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
>> 
>> Shill #2
>
>It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not 
>understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..

I guess being crazy means you don't have to follow the same rules of English as
everyone else.

Shill #2
--
Them™
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527421

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:22:10 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>, 
>>gov.shill@gmail.com says...
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>>> >
>>> >" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
>>> >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
>>> >collapse. "
>>> >
>>> >Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
>>> >ANYWHERE.
>>> 
>>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
>>> Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
>>> 
>>> Right there, in your quote.
>>> 
>>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
>>> 
>>> Shill #2
>>
>>It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not 
>>understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..
>
>I guess being crazy means you don't have to follow the same rules of English as
>everyone else.

LOL.    :)

>Shill #2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527445

In article <h77h2btur97o2qae8vrf30ksqhi0jghfkj@4ax.com>, 
ninety7gt@cox.net says...
> 
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:22:10 +1100, Government Shill #2
> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>, 
> >>gov.shill@gmail.com says...
> >>> 
> >>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> >What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
> >>> >
> >>> >" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
> >>> >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
> >>> >collapse. "
> >>> >
> >>> >Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
> >>> >ANYWHERE.
> >>> 
> >>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
> >>> Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
> >>> 
> >>> Right there, in your quote.
> >>> 
> >>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
> >>> 
> >>> Shill #2
> >>
> >>It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not 
> >>understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..
> >
> >I guess being crazy means you don't have to follow the same rules of English as
> >everyone else.
> 
> LOL.    :)
> 
> >Shill #2

In the Troofer world, rules and proof as just things that don't matter, 
it's all in the feelings about stuff. 

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527574

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:15:28 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

>In article <h77h2btur97o2qae8vrf30ksqhi0jghfkj@4ax.com>, 
>ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>> 
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:22:10 +1100, Government Shill #2
>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>, 
>> >>gov.shill@gmail.com says...
>> >>> 
>> >>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> >What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
>> >>> >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
>> >>> >collapse. "
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
>> >>> >ANYWHERE.
>> >>> 
>> >>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
>> >>> Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
>> >>> 
>> >>> Right there, in your quote.
>> >>> 
>> >>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Shill #2
>> >>
>> >>It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not 
>> >>understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..
>> >
>> >I guess being crazy means you don't have to follow the same rules of English as
>> >everyone else.
>> 
>> LOL.    :)
>> 
>> >Shill #2
>
>In the Troofer world, rules and proof as just things that don't matter, 
>it's all in the feelings about stuff. 

Mostly feelings based on false premises and outright lies.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527438

Government Shill #2 wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>,
>> gov.shill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>>>>
>>>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the
>>>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused
>>>> the side to collapse. "
>>>>
>>>> Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane
>>>> ", ANYWHERE.
>>>
>>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side
>>> of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
>>>
>>> Right there, in your quote.
>>>
>>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
>>>
>>> Shill #2
>>
>> It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not
>> understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..
>
> I guess being crazy means you don't have to follow the same rules of
> English as everyone else.
>
> Shill #2








Not when you can listen to the guy saying it in the video.
Which you know people are paying attention to.
As it seems to have received quite a few likes in the last day or so.

They also notice you keep cliping it out.....Do you just delete bills in 
your real life like that ?   And how is pretending that reality doesn't 
exist working out for you ??



Oh, BTW here's the link again to the video, for anyone to watch and judge 
for themselves, what the reporter says.

9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ


And to amun,... Thumbs up,....." What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt 
? "
As it describes these government stoolies perfectly. Especially the male 
ones.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527420

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

>In article <6jbg2bdfi4m8olmdnsgiul0bm8nv3qpf3o@4ax.com>, 
>gov.shill@gmail.com says...
>> 
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> wrote:
>> 
>> >What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>> >
>> >" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
>> >plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
>> >collapse. "
>> >
>> >Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
>> >ANYWHERE.
>> 
>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
>> Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. "
>> 
>> Right there, in your quote.
>> 
>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's.
>> 
>> Shill #2
>
>It's funny how desperately the Troofers hang onto that quote, not 
>understanding it doesn't mean what they think it does..

The Troofer mind is defective.   It is like being a dyslexic.   They 
don't see the words on the paper/computer screen the same way
everyone else sees them.  Plus they are unable to comprehend what they
read. 

Look at Bast. She thinks we don't recognize she is "AMUN"
<antispam@sparmmstop.org>  with the same disjointed thought processes,
posting style, formatting, etc... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527417

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
wrote:

>
>
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:51:15 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW we know when that helicopter took off by radar readings and the
>>> Pentagon was crashed into after it took off but the clock at the
>>> heliport quit working because the attacks at the Pentagon actually
>>> started before the helicopter took off as proven by people in that
>>> helicopter.  See:
>>>
>>> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>>> (  Indexed to start at what really hit the Pentagon )
>>> https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=28m30s
>>
>> This woman is as insane as you are, Roger.
>>
>> There was no "white plane" that crashed at the Pentagon on 9/11.
>>
>>> And talking about the Pentagon:
>>>
>>> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
>>>
>>> MCINTYRE: "You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my
>>> close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed
>>> anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the
>>> building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that
>>> you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There
>>> are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, >
>> You keep citing this interview.  What Jamie McIntyre says is there was
>> no crash anywhere near the Pentagon except for the actual site [ of
>> the crash] into the building that is crashed in ....
>>
>>> Rocky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?

Hi Bast.  

>" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
>plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
>collapse. "
>
>Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  

"the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then
caused the side to collapse. "

Indeed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527428

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org>
wrote:

>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:51:15 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW we know when that helicopter took off by radar readings and the
>>> Pentagon was crashed into after it took off but the clock at the
>>> heliport quit working because the attacks at the Pentagon actually
>>> started before the helicopter took off as proven by people in that
>>> helicopter.  See:
>>>
>>> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>>> (  Indexed to start at what really hit the Pentagon )
>>> https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=28m30s
>>
>> This woman is as insane as you are, Roger.
>>
>> There was no "white plane" that crashed at the Pentagon on 9/11.
>>
>>> And talking about the Pentagon:
>>>
>>> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
>>>
>>> MCINTYRE: "You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my
>>> close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed
>>> anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the
>>> building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that
>>> you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There
>>> are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, >
>> You keep citing this interview.  What Jamie McIntyre says is there was
>> no crash anywhere near the Pentagon except for the actual site [ of
>> the crash] into the building that is crashed in ....
>
>
>
>What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>

     Out of curiosity, why the nym change, Bast?

>" nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire 
>plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to 
>collapse. "
>
>Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ", 
>ANYWHERE.

     You need a remedial English class.

"... the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then
caused the side to collapse. "

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527900

<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1a117b76-41c4-4f75-975f-6cedb6c0fbc9@googlegroups.com...
>
>> >> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
>> >>
>> >> MCINTYRE: "You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my
>> >> close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed
>> >> anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the
>> >> building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that
>> >> you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There
>> >> are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, >
>> > You keep citing this interview.  What Jamie McIntyre says is there was
>> > no crash anywhere near the Pentagon except for the actual site [ of
>> > the crash] into the building that is crashed in ....
>> >
>> >> Rocky
>>
>>
>> What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ?
>>
>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire
>> plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to
>> collapse. "
>>
>> Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said,  "no plane ",
>> ANYWHERE.
>
> Follow your own advice;
>
> [quote]
>> >> The only site is the actual site of the
>> >> building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that
>> >> you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand.
> [end quote]
>
> No plane anywhere ON THE GROUNDS," it's all in the building.

ROTFLMAO because nobody has been able to explain how it got there if it 
really did.  <G>

And do not forget about the jet that crashed at Pranksville, PA  That jet is 
nowhere to be found because it flew right into the dirt and then vanished.

Let's see.  All four jets that were supposed to be hijacked miraculously 
disappeared somehow as if they never existed in the first place.

But what I think is the funniest part is NIST didn't even try to explain why 
there was so little left of the Twin Towers in comparison to what was left 
of WTC7.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527901

<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:fd538bda-4452-4822-854a-45ef049dccb8@googlegroups.com...

> >9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
> >
> >MCINTYRE: "You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my 
> >close-up
> >inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near 
> >the
> >Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed
> >in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough
> >that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing
> >sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would 
> >indicate
> >that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then 
> >caused
> >the side to collapse. "
>
> You keep citing this interview.  What Jamie McIntyre says is there was
> no crash anywhere near the Pentagon except for the actual site [ of
> the crash] into the building that is crashed in ....
>
> >Rocky

I've been here with him before. His argument is that wings and the tail 
should have snapped off and fallen outside the 16' hole. I think they were 
dragged in through cables and tubing. I do remember seeing a shot, 
pre-collapse of the wall, that showed a "dent" to the right of the wall 
which I took to be the engine having hit the wall before being dragged into 
the hole.

  ========================

ROTFLMAO because all you did was add more bullshit to the bullshit stories 
about how a jet disappeared from view as if it had never been there in the 
first place.

Don't forget that the disappearance of two jets in Nuke York City is 
consistent with CGIs and the jet that disappeared in Pranksville, PA is 
consistent with a prank.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528214

<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fd538bda-4452-4822-854a-45ef049dccb8@googlegroups.com...

>I've been here with him before. His argument is that wings and the tail 
>should have snapped off and fallen outside the 16' hole. I think they were 
>dragged in through cables and tubing. I do remember seeing a shot, 
>pre-collapse of the wall, that showed a "dent" to the right of the wall 
>which I took to be the engine having hit the wall before being dragged into 
>the hole.

Don't let the kooktards mislead you with the "16' hole" crap.  The hole
into the 2nd floor was a semicircle about 16' in diameter, caused by the
upper half of the fuselage.  The kooktards point that out and say "See?  
16' Hole! What happened to the wings?" However, the hole in the first
floor, caused by the lower fuslage and the wings, was about 96' wide, and
this width, plus the internal column damage, was why that section of the
Pentagon collapsed. No "wing folding" or wings being dragged in, they
blasted their way in from the sheer momentum and enormous kinetic energy.  
Newton's First Law wins again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527668

In article <2Y6dneOKhayVZrrLnZ2dnUU7-RGdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:n06iui$ng1$1@dont-email.me...
> > 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof!
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypc4ieJO0pg
> >
> > Of course this does not dismiss that the WTC towers were also likely hit 
> > by a similar missile.
> > And explain why eyewitnesses that morning, claimed they only saw a small 
> > plane with no windows.
> >
> > Why would they have even suspected they were actually seeing US cruise 
> > type missiles ?
> > As no sane person would have ever suspected that morning their own 
> > government could kill so many people with no remorse.
> > Just for an excuse to start an unending war.
> >
> >
> > ....The SAME PEOPLE who recently could target a hospital in Afghanistan, 
> > and claim the deaths were nothing more than, "collateral damage" .
> >
> >
> > http://www.ae911truth.org
> 
> 
> And the military helicopter that recorded that footage was in numerous other 
> videos taken of the Pentagon so the 9/11 Hoaxsters didn't blank out the sky 
> at the Pentagon the way they tried to blank out the sky in Nuke York City.
> 
> It is clear the reason the Hoaxsters didn't have to blank out the sky at the 
> Pentagon was they didn't add CGIs that skipped and lost wings to the 
> Pentagon footage.
> 
> BTW we know when that helicopter took off by radar readings and the Pentagon 
> was crashed into after it took off but the clock at the heliport quit 
> working because the attacks at the Pentagon actually started before the 
> helicopter took off as proven by people in that helicopter.  See:
> 
> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
> (  Indexed to start at what really hit the Pentagon )
>  https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=28m30s
> 
> And talking about the Pentagon:
> 
> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ
> 
> MCINTYRE: "You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up 
> inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the 
> Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed 
> in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough 
> that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing 
> sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate 
> that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused 
> the side to collapse. "
> 
> Rocky 

Let's look at the "Black Box"

Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under 
the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report 
claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official 
account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to 
hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with 
its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous 
findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6133
and some 1700+ architects and engineers say the 3 WTC towers could not 
have fallen as the gov. would have you believe.
Let's ask questions.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web