Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #524744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-05 15:31 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-10-06 12:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 158 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 15:31 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:32 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:11 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:58 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 16:16 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:09 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-06 10:41 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:59 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 15:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-06 21:17 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 16:50 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 16:32 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:31 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 18:11 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 05:47 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 19:15 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 19:59 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 20:04 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 21:17 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 22:18 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:59 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 18:03 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 20:18 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:18 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 23:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 05:21 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 10:31 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 17:07 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 17:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 18:18 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 20:23 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 23:58 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 12:54 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 09:09 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 19:44 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 12:31 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 14:39 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 19:33 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 17:10 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 19:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 18:36 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-10 08:01 -0400
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:11 -0400
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-11 04:06 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 13:35 -0500
HOH versus OCO noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:14 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-11 03:56 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 23:07 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-11 01:49 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-11 04:14 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-11 13:28 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-13 15:21 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-13 17:03 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 09:34 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:52 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-14 04:28 +0200
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 04:30 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 03:55 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-15 09:59 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-15 18:11 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-16 17:51 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-18 06:36 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-18 06:45 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 14:07 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-19 15:15 +0000
p.m is cOOl noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 15:17 -0700
Re: p.m is cOOl noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 19:24 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-17 18:17 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-18 06:53 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-18 07:11 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 14:07 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 10:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-18 11:27 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-18 14:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 20:21 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-19 14:45 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 10:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-15 20:18 +0200
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 03:46 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 14:34 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-16 23:52 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 01:56 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-17 09:55 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 17:15 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-17 12:22 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 13:16 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 10:36 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 14:29 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 04:00 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-17 06:05 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 10:56 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 17:21 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 14:47 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 15:07 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 21:03 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 16:16 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 18:20 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 15:43 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-13 21:18 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 19:45 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:01 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 05:28 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:39 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 08:42 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 10:25 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 23:02 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 14:51 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-08 10:52 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:12 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 20:05 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 21:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 09:02 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-08 10:57 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 17:08 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 08:46 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 10:30 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 13:48 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:27 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:18 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:40 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 21:16 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 22:23 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 03:02 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 14:54 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 04:58 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-08 10:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 16:55 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:30 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-10 11:44 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-11 10:20 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 09:32 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 17:07 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 20:28 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:38 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:09 -0500
p.m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 12:09 -0700
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 20:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <o9aj1bh41gctfl9iv6vhqvmg7g8kh7iqd9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525466 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:39:43 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:mv8c2a$gk0$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>> >>>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:13:57 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean, Bast? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WHAT PLANES? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, what does "spectrum" mean, Bast? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Spectrum.....plural of Spectre >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://jamesbond.wikia.com/wiki/SPECTRE >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. A real electrical engineer would know the meaning of >>>>>> "spectrum". >>>>> >>>>> WHY ? >>> >>>> Because it would be very familiar to you if you were in fact an >>>> electrical engineer. >>> >>>> See here: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN REPOST-------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>>> Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>>> Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned >>>> into a liquid. >>>> Message-ID: <mv4ooa$70m$1@pcls7.std.com> >>> >>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>> >>>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean to you, Bast. It is very specific and >>>>>>> you should know it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of couse I know about your organization. >>>>>> >>>>>> SPECTRE = Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, >>>>>> Revenge >>>>>> and Extortion >>> >>>>> The word is "spectrum". Any electrical engineer would know the >>>>> answer immediately. >>> >>>>> You've demonstrated you've lied again. >>> >>>> As an electrical engineer myself, I find this very clever. Excellent >>>> job exposing Bast's lie, and thanks for the laugh! >>> >>> >>>> -------END Michael's Post------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>>> Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>>> engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>>> someone between 9 and 12 years old. >>> >>> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >>> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >>> >>> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >>> What else do you lie about? >> >I think the funniest part is why they would even care that I have any degree >at all. You volunteered the information. And now you're squirming because we've caught you telling that lie. You have no credibility Bast. Your cites have no credibility. You're a bumbling fool and a laughing stock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 19:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mv94qh$ksp$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #525420 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mv8c2a$gk0$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>>Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>>engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>>someone between 9 and 12 years old. >> >> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >> >> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >> What else do you lie about? >You two are so funny because when you fell for all that crap about 19 >hijackers all you did was prove you both are incapable of critical thinking. >Rocky Wow, Rocky! I just realized that you proved that Bast always lies!! Remember when you said that because a reporter at the Pentagon lied and said the wings folded back on Flight 77, that all the witnesses in NYC must be lying when they said they saw planes hit the World Trade Center? And we applied this genius logic to prove all kookvids are lies because I discovered the kookvid with the crane was faked? Well, Sarah proved that Bast lied about being an electrical engineer, and if we apply your wonderful logic about the plane witnesses all being liars to her, this proves that Bast is always lying! I'll bet Bast will be mad that you proved that to us! Maybe she will show you that's she's mad by being extra nice to you. Because she will be lying, of course.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 17:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <c-6dnW-2_uwYpoXLnZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525475 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mv94qh$ksp$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mv8c2a$gk0$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >>>>Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>>>engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>>>someone between 9 and 12 years old. >>> >>> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >>> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >>> >>> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >>> What else do you lie about? > >>You two are so funny because when you fell for all that crap about 19 >>hijackers all you did was prove you both are incapable of critical >>thinking. > >>Rocky > > Wow, Rocky! I just realized that you proved that Bast always lies!! > Remember when you said that because a reporter at the Pentagon lied and > said the wings folded back on Flight 77, that all the witnesses in NYC > must be lying when they said they saw planes hit the World Trade Center? WRONG. I'm saying their stories probably changed too. Go ahead and find my quote. Wow, you pulled a Popular Mechanics trick. You substituted one argument for another. What you did is called using a strawman argument and you are getting good at it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 19:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mv9k0h$3ai$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #525509 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mv94qh$ksp$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:mv8c2a$gk0$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>>> Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>>>> engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>>>> someone between 9 and 12 years old. >>>> >>>> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >>>> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >>>> >>>> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical >>>> engineer. What else do you lie about? >> >>> You two are so funny because when you fell for all that crap about 19 >>> hijackers all you did was prove you both are incapable of critical >>> thinking. >> >>> Rocky >> >> Wow, Rocky! I just realized that you proved that Bast always lies!! >> Remember when you said that because a reporter at the Pentagon lied and >> said the wings folded back on Flight 77, that all the witnesses in NYC >> must be lying when they said they saw planes hit the World Trade >> Center? > > WRONG. I'm saying their stories probably changed too. Go ahead and > find my quote. > > Wow, you pulled a Popular Mechanics trick. You substituted one > argument for another. What you did is called using a strawman argument > and you are getting good at it. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man > > Rocky I see absolutely no reason why we have to agree on everything. We don't have a holy book of the official 9/11 fairytale to refer to, like the DWEEBunkers We only have hypothesis based on the evidence each of us has found. And a commonality that we know the offical 9/11 fairytale makes no logical sense at all Which is why we are forcing that a new proper and impartial investivation be held, where all the evidence can be compiled and scrutinized. A fairly good attempt was made at the conference in Toronto on the 10th anniversary, where much of the newest evidence was presented Much of this video (link below) deals with that conference 9/11: Decade of Deception (Full Film NEW 2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48 Watch the video, and decide for yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 18:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b902c075-24f3-480f-b939-392d3960387d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #525532 |
I am rolling upon the floor, and it is gOOd ... I mean, do you have a problem with my rolling upon the flOOr > I see absolutely no reason why we have to agree on everything. > We don't have a holy book of the official 9/11 fairytale to refer to, like > the DWEEBunkers > > We only have hypothesis based on the evidence each of us has found. > And a commonality that we know the offical 9/11 fairytale makes no logical > sense at all > Which is why we are forcing that a new proper and impartial investivation be > held, where all the evidence can be compiled and scrutinized. > > A fairly good attempt was made at the conference in Toronto on the 10th > anniversary, where much of the newest evidence was presented > Much of this video (link below) deals with that conference > > > > > 9/11: Decade of Deception (Full Film NEW 2015) > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48 > > Watch the video, and decide for yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <12nh1b9iftctvqrbg3t3p2uqs3fba79gp5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525411 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
[...]
>>-----BEGIN REPOST--------------------------------------------
>
>>From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>>Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned
>>into a liquid.
>>Message-ID: <mv4ooa$70m$1@pcls7.std.com>
>
>
>>Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>
>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean to you, Bast. It is very specific and you
>>>>> should know it.
>>>>
>>>>Of couse I know about your organization.
>>>>
>>>>SPECTRE = Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge
>>>>and Extortion
>
>>>The word is "spectrum". Any electrical engineer would know the answer
>>>immediately.
>
>>>You've demonstrated you've lied again.
>
>>As an electrical engineer myself, I find this very clever. Excellent
>>job exposing Bast's lie, and thanks for the laugh!
>
>
>>-------END Michael's Post------------------------------------
>
>
>
>>Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical
>>engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from
>>someone between 9 and 12 years old.
>
>hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah.
>But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them.
>
>Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer.
>What else do you lie about?
What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition
of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even
this was and is beyond Bast's abilities.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 08:01 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers |
| Message-ID | <mvaui8$d8o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #525572 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC), > moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > > [...] > >>> -----BEGIN REPOST-------------------------------------------- >> >>> From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>> Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>> Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned >>> into a liquid. >>> Message-ID: <mv4ooa$70m$1@pcls7.std.com> >> >> >>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean to you, Bast. It is very specific and >>>>>> you should know it. >>>>> >>>>> Of couse I know about your organization. >>>>> >>>>> SPECTRE = Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, >>>>> Revenge and Extortion >> >>>> The word is "spectrum". Any electrical engineer would know the >>>> answer immediately. >> >>>> You've demonstrated you've lied again. >> >>> As an electrical engineer myself, I find this very clever. Excellent >>> job exposing Bast's lie, and thanks for the laugh! >> >> >>> -------END Michael's Post------------------------------------ >> >> >> >>> Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>> engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>> someone between 9 and 12 years old. >> >> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >> >> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >> What else do you lie about? > > What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition > of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even > this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. But the point is,....I did not have to look it up. And answered your question days ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 13:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers |
| Message-ID | <nfmi1b9n019erhc8s38j588qmr6magi54t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525585 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:15 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC),
>> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> -----BEGIN REPOST--------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>> From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>> Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned
>>>> into a liquid.
>>>> Message-ID: <mv4ooa$70m$1@pcls7.std.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean to you, Bast. It is very specific and
>>>>>>> you should know it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of couse I know about your organization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SPECTRE = Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism,
>>>>>> Revenge and Extortion
>>>
>>>>> The word is "spectrum". Any electrical engineer would know the
>>>>> answer immediately.
>>>
>>>>> You've demonstrated you've lied again.
>>>
>>>> As an electrical engineer myself, I find this very clever. Excellent
>>>> job exposing Bast's lie, and thanks for the laugh!
>>>
>>>
>>>> -------END Michael's Post------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical
>>>> engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from
>>>> someone between 9 and 12 years old.
>>>
>>> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah.
>>> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them.
>>>
>>> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer.
>>> What else do you lie about?
>>
>> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition
>> of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even
>> this was and is beyond Bast's abilities.
>
>
>
>
>But the point is,....I did not have to look it up.
>And answered your question days ago.
I didn't ask the question. Sarah did. And you've not answered her
question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 20:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers |
| Message-ID | <c1aj1bhasb72lp45ikseg940tidfjh5nbu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525585 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:15 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC), >> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> -----BEGIN REPOST-------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>>> Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>>> Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned >>>> into a liquid. >>>> Message-ID: <mv4ooa$70m$1@pcls7.std.com> >>> >>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>> >>>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean to you, Bast. It is very specific and >>>>>>> you should know it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of couse I know about your organization. >>>>>> >>>>>> SPECTRE = Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, >>>>>> Revenge and Extortion >>> >>>>> The word is "spectrum". Any electrical engineer would know the >>>>> answer immediately. >>> >>>>> You've demonstrated you've lied again. >>> >>>> As an electrical engineer myself, I find this very clever. Excellent >>>> job exposing Bast's lie, and thanks for the laugh! >>> >>> >>>> -------END Michael's Post------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>>> Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>>> engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>>> someone between 9 and 12 years old. >>> >>> hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >>> But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >>> >>> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >>> What else do you lie about? >> >> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition >> of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even >> this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. Bast never vets her cites either. The most recent one where she claims a so called " 9/11 expert is a pilot " when the truth is the guy is an economist. She's just a laughing stock. >But the point is,....I did not have to look it up. > >And answered your question days ago. You're not an electrical engineer. We know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 04:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers |
| Message-ID | <fj9k1blob4nal6s4o5c40j8i6qqmkhkjjb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525658 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:11:34 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
[...]
>>>> Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer.
>>>> What else do you lie about?
>>>
>>> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition
>>> of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even
>>> this was and is beyond Bast's abilities.
>
>Bast never vets her cites either. The most recent one where she
>claims a so called " 9/11 expert is a pilot " when the truth is the
>guy is an economist. She's just a laughing stock.
>
I doubt she pays any attention to what she's linked to. It's
clear she doesn't actually watch the videos. The one where the
reporter states the plane crashed *into* the Pentagon as opposed to
near the Pentagon should stand as proof of this.
>
>>But the point is,....I did not have to look it up.
>>
>>And answered your question days ago.
>
>You're not an electrical engineer. We know.
What's more, she first LIES and claims the question was mine
(Bast does seem to think you're me and BDK), then LIES and states it
was answered.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 15:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mvbbiv$gtb$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #525572 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> writes: >On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC), >moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >>Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >>What else do you lie about? > What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition >of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even >this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. I was thinking the same thing. Maybe kooktard sheeple aren't allowed to access the net except to watch officially approved kookvids and to do their assigned roles of posting here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 13:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qimi1b9v5ae24pgvitlep82mr1ejei7hs8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525589 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:41:19 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC),
>>moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
>>>Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer.
>>>What else do you lie about?
>
>> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition
>>of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even
>>this was and is beyond Bast's abilities.
>
>I was thinking the same thing. Maybe kooktard sheeple aren't allowed to
>access the net except to watch officially approved kookvids and to do
>their assigned roles of posting here.
Or Bast was, and is, too stupid to think of looking it up. Let's
be honest, Bast isn't exactly an intellectual giant.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 16:38 -0700 |
| Subject | HOH versus OCO |
| Message-ID | <a413ab5e-4335-49ef-8127-a3fe2b6755da@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #525589 |
teh spectrum of the vapor of combustion, is much larger than the ash of combustion
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 20:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3eaj1bds6g7h5u6knd2o4h42cudhhhaf28@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525572 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:37:18 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC), >moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > >[...] > >>>-----BEGIN REPOST-------------------------------------------- >> >>>From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>>Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics >>>Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned >>>into a liquid. >>>Message-ID: <mv4ooa$70m$1@pcls7.std.com> >> >> >>>Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>>>> What does "spectrum" mean to you, Bast. It is very specific and you >>>>>> should know it. >>>>> >>>>>Of couse I know about your organization. >>>>> >>>>>SPECTRE = Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge >>>>>and Extortion >> >>>>The word is "spectrum". Any electrical engineer would know the answer >>>>immediately. >> >>>>You've demonstrated you've lied again. >> >>>As an electrical engineer myself, I find this very clever. Excellent >>>job exposing Bast's lie, and thanks for the laugh! >> >> >>>-------END Michael's Post------------------------------------ >> >> >> >>>Everyone agrees Bast, that you are a liar, you are not an electrical >>>engineer. Frankly your level of maturity is what I'd expect from >>>someone between 9 and 12 years old. >> >>hehehe... I'm still laughing.... I like the way you think, Sarah. >>But don't insult 12 year olds by comparing Bast to them. >> >>Admit it, Bast. You lied to us, you never were an electrical engineer. >>What else do you lie about? > > What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition >of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even >this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 03:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mvcml0$7l8$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #525660 |
Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:37:18 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" ><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition >>of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even >>this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. >Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :) yeah, having an IQ above room temperature disqualifies you from being a 9/11 kook...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 23:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_qOdnZq4ioIvfYTLnZ2dnUU7-QmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525678 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mvcml0$7l8$1@pcls7.std.com... > Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >>On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:37:18 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" >><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition >>>of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even >>>this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. > >>Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :) > > yeah, having an IQ above room temperature disqualifies you from being a > 9/11 kook... That coming from people that think an aluminum egg shell should leave roadrunner cutouts in the Twin Towers is hilarious. THE NO PLANES MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 01:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tvtj1bpr0mii3g9c4inq7tl9conbh5bf5f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525679 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:07:07 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mvcml0$7l8$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >> >>>On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:37:18 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" >>><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition >>>>of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even >>>>this was and is beyond Bast's abilities. >> >>>Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :) >> >> yeah, having an IQ above room temperature disqualifies you from being a >> 9/11 kook... Bast keep posting links to video's which support us. Roger Rocky must be ready to disown her. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 04:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l3ak1bt8nqiasfi817v803dmkhli3n6l3m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525685 |
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 01:49:06 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:07:07 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mvcml0$7l8$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:37:18 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>>>><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> What I find most sad is how easy it is to look up the definition
>>>>>of spectrum as used in the field of electrical engineering. Yet even
>>>>>this was and is beyond Bast's abilities.
>>>
>>>>Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :)
>>>
>>> yeah, having an IQ above room temperature disqualifies you from being a
>>> 9/11 kook...
>
>Bast keep posting links to video's which support us. Roger Rocky must
>be ready to disown her. :)
Bast is the only person not pointing out how the videos Rocky
links to prove his claims wrong. He's not going to distance himself
from such a person any time soon.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 13:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mvdo5a$v21$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #525679 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mvcml0$7l8$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >>>Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :) >> >> yeah, having an IQ above room temperature disqualifies you from being a >> 9/11 kook... >That coming from people that think an aluminum egg shell should leave >roadrunner cutouts in the Twin Towers is hilarious. K00ktard, at such speeds it's the momentum and the change of momentum (force) applied over a small area that determines what happens. The mass of the airplane at 500 mph applied to a relatively small area of cheap, thin steel, there's no way for the steel to resist that. The strength of the material just determines whether it's a solid airplane or a mass of rubble that's flying through the inside of the tower. BTW, not that it matters, but it has already been shown to you that the aircraft aluminum is as strong or stronger than steel. Did you ever consider what would happen if someone dropped a water balloon onto your kooktarded head from the top of a tall building? You'd just get wet, since a balloon is flimsy rubber and water is, just water? How about a water balloon at 500 mph? >THE NO PLANES MOVIE Is that the one with the crane that I already proved has been tampered with? So I don't even need your "all kookvids are lies" proof to prove it is a lie?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-13 15:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Y_Sdne_P-eWX9YDLnZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525701 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mvdo5a$v21$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mvcml0$7l8$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >>>>Bast is stupid. And that's being kind. :) >>> >>> yeah, having an IQ above room temperature disqualifies you from being a >>> 9/11 kook... > >>That coming from people that think an aluminum egg shell should leave >>roadrunner cutouts in the Twin Towers is hilarious. > > K00ktard, at such speeds it's the momentum and the change of momentum > (force) applied over a small area that determines what happens. The mass > of the airplane at 500 mph applied to a relatively small area of cheap, > thin steel, there's no way for the steel to resist that. ROTFLMAO because the 500 mph at 1000 feet above sea level is bullshit. Jets can not fly that fast where the air is thick and only CGIs could have done that. Real jets would have either failed to make it to 500 mph or flown apart. See 07 - The Key https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds ... THE NO PLANES MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U And there are a lot more videos that deal just with the bogus speed the jet was alleged to be at. > Is that the one with the crane that I already proved has been tampered > with? NO. > So I don't even need your "all kookvids are lies" proof to prove > it is a lie? ROTFLMAO because I just caught you in another bold faced lie. Remember when you claimed that the jet was too high for Chopper 5? Well you can hear the Camera 5 cameraman in this video claim the jet was low. <G> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=8m38s So it was you that was caught up in more lies. <G> BTW you did not prove who tampered with the video with the crane and the disappearing wing or try to explain why the wing disappeared either. And a lot of VCRs recorded the news giving us videos with the wing disappearing so despite what you think the media used that crap in real life. And don't forget, you have failed to explain why there is nobody in the following photo or how a kerosene collapse could leave so much of the North Tower standing strong. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg The fact remains there are so many inconsistencies with the official ever changing stories that you have to lie to keep up with the governments BS. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web