Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #523737 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-29 11:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 247 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 13:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 18:23 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 17:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:17 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 05:02 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 08:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:55 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 14:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 19:20 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 09:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 12:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:31 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:47 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 06:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-03 05:33 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 22:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 19:33 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 16:30 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 19:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 04:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 04:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 14:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 13:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 21:41 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 12:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 20:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 21:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 15:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 16:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 10:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-08 03:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:11 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 16:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:19 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 20:09 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 10:59 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-10 00:57 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 11:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 09:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 14:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-06 15:59 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-07 05:58 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 17:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 02:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 02:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 18:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 10:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:40 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 11:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-03 19:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 18:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 20:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 03:24 +0000
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:39 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:07 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 13:36 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:21 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 18:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 19:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:18 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:32 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 19:22 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:08 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 00:26 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 04:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:34 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:26 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 09:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 07:34 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 09:28 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 02:56 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 12:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 16:13 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 18:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 23:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 22:54 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 22:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 04:35 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 20:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:50 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 21:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 09:16 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:14 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 14:30 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:54 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:46 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:17 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:37 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 14:41 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 10:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 17:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-02 20:34 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 19:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:11 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 08:27 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-30 00:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 17:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 11:59 -0700
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #524095 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when they >are hijacked Shiny silver, like this? http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 16:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <39idnWn6rpCvApDLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524107 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when they >>are hijacked > > Shiny silver, like this? > http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg And??? You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G> ==================================== Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE Published on Mar 22, 2014 Completed 3/22/2014 by James Easton and Steve Grage THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! James Easton - September 20, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 17:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muk9iv$t7n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524128 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when >>> they are hijacked >> >> Shiny silver, like this? >> http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg > > And??? > > You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three > different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G> Isn't it funny that the one example this clown posts is a stock image shot, and not one taken on 9/11. The day when planes changed colors depending on which CARTOON you watched. (sorry I am posting here and not directly to the post as I am still having problems with my news server, and didn;'t get that post) > > ==================================== > > Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE > > Published on Mar 22, 2014 > > Completed 3/22/2014 > by James Easton and Steve Grage > THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. > > Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on > 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! > > Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The > BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. > > Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. > > This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying > THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! > > James Easton - September 20, 2014 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U > > Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q7is0bpnv2324ims71vahbmq1tam60q0v3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524143 |
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:48:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when
>>>> they are hijacked
>>>
>>> Shiny silver, like this?
>>> http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg
>>
>> And???
>>
>> You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three
>> different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Isn't it funny that the one example this clown posts is a stock image shot,
>and not one taken on 9/11.
>The day when planes changed colors depending on which CARTOON you watched.
>
Funny how just one picture PROVES you wrong.
>(sorry I am posting here and not directly to the post as I am still having
>problems with my news server, and didn;'t get that post)
Because you're too stupid to get and use a real news reader.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 09:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <uYudndOfJeBJB5PLnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524143 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:muk9iv$t7n$1@dont-email.me... > Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when >>>> they are hijacked >>> >>> Shiny silver, like this? >>> http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg >> >> And??? >> >> You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three >> different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G> > > > > > > > Isn't it funny that the one example this clown posts is a stock image > shot, and not one taken on 9/11. > The day when planes changed colors depending on which CARTOON you watched. > > (sorry I am posting here and not directly to the post as I am still > having problems with my news server, and didn;'t get that post) Michael will not post to alt.astronomy. He thinks if you really want to post to him you will subscribe to alt.physics and he has even posted something like that. BTW the following video shows 2 or 3 different CGIs that were used by the 9/11 Hoaxsters. >> ==================================== >> >> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE >> >> Published on Mar 22, 2014 >> >> Completed 3/22/2014 >> by James Easton and Steve Grage >> THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. >> >> Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on >> 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! >> >> Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The >> BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. >> >> Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. >> >> This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying >> THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! >> >> James Easton - September 20, 2014 >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U >> >> Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 12:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mumar6$enc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524239 |
Rocky wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:muk9iv$t7n$1@dont-email.me... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>> >>>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly >>>>> when they are hijacked >>>> >>>> Shiny silver, like this? >>>> http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg >>> >>> And??? >>> >>> You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three >>> different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Isn't it funny that the one example this clown posts is a stock image >> shot, and not one taken on 9/11. >> The day when planes changed colors depending on which CARTOON you >> watched. (sorry I am posting here and not directly to the post as I am >> still >> having problems with my news server, and didn;'t get that post) > > > Michael will not post to alt.astronomy. He thinks if you really want to > post to him you will subscribe to alt.physics and he has even posted > something like that. I hate to tell you this but my newsreader shows he's still posting exclusively to alt.astronomy. Not that I really care or have any desire to waste any more elecrons over that. or arguing pointlessly with the other dweeb-bunkers. Well over a million people have posted "9/11 was an inside job" videos , to youtube alone. ...So which side do you think has more members
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 10:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3079b243f17e190c98c305@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524247 |
In article <mumar6$enc$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > > news:muk9iv$t7n$1@dont-email.me... > >> Rocky wrote: > >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > >>> news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com... > >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>>> > >>>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly > >>>>> when they are hijacked > >>>> > >>>> Shiny silver, like this? > >>>> http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg > >>> > >>> And??? > >>> > >>> You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three > >>> different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Isn't it funny that the one example this clown posts is a stock image > >> shot, and not one taken on 9/11. > >> The day when planes changed colors depending on which CARTOON you > >> watched. (sorry I am posting here and not directly to the post as I am > >> still > >> having problems with my news server, and didn;'t get that post) > > > > > > Michael will not post to alt.astronomy. He thinks if you really want to > > post to him you will subscribe to alt.physics and he has even posted > > something like that. > > > > > > I hate to tell you this but my newsreader shows he's still posting > exclusively to alt.astronomy. > Not that I really care or have any desire to waste any more elecrons over > that. or arguing pointlessly with the other dweeb-bunkers. You mean sane disbelievers in the the Troofer Faith? > > Well over a million people have posted "9/11 was an inside job" videos , to > youtube alone. > ...So which side do you think has more members The sans side, by far. We see Troofery for what it's worth. Nothing at all. Except for a little bit of entertainment value. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mukfoi$ev0$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #524128 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >> >>>And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when they >>>are hijacked >> >> Shiny silver, like this? >> http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg >And??? >You only posted one photo. Now get a photo of one of the two or three >different CGIs that they used in Nuke York City. <G> Why? It takes only one picture to show how shiny silver UA 175 was. UA 175 was the only plane most people saw and it was rather dark, just like the plane that crashed into the south tower.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j7is0bli20rsmvm20l16qtt5ssg1dvqlie@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524107 |
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:20:18 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>
>>And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when they
>>are hijacked
>
>Shiny silver, like this?
>http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg
Exactly!
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 10:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3078598878e0897198c302@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524107 |
In article <muk11i$eqf$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > > >And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when they > >are hijacked > > Shiny silver, like this? > http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/N612UA_Flight_175.jpg You have to understand Bash has to reject anything that contradicts The Book of Troofery. It's part of her religion, and it's a sign of her stupidity. One can't be a troofer without a serious lack of smarts. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <26is0b1lcs6vtnb3827gng61jlcsb446nc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524095 |
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:20:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>>>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the
>>>>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National
>>>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation
>>>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the
>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident
>>>>>> investigations.
>>>>>
>>>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since
>>>>> they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not
>>>>> lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation.
>>>>
>>>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law
>>>> says.
>>>
>>> Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought
>>> down the towers, NOT PLANES.
>>
>> First, NIST is not the NTSB.
>> Second, the NIST makes no such claim.
>>
>>> Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were all
>>> suspended for the day, including the rules of physics.
>>
>> Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the
>> laws of physics were suspended? You would have to.
>
>
>Well, what else is it when a building that is collapsing due to asymetrical
>damage,....doesn't actually fall.
>But just turns to dust in midair.
>
I'm not aware of any building ever doing such.
>And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when they
>are hijacked
>
As opposed to the gray color they were?
>That kind of shit isn't even mentioned in the bible,....as no one would have
>ever believed it.
Especially since planes and the twin towers didn't exist.
What does the contents of the Bible have to do with your Troofer
religion?
>So they just stuck to guys who could give life to the dead, and change pure
>water into complex organic molecules
>
Which has what, exactly, to do with your blind faith in the
Troofer religion?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 05:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muljed$jvp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524216 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:20:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >>>>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the >>>>>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National >>>>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation >>>>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the >>>>>> >>>>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident >>>>>>> investigations. >>>>>> >>>>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since >>>>>> they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not >>>>>> lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. >>>>> >>>>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the >>>>> law says. >>>> >>>> Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought >>>> down the towers, NOT PLANES. >>> >>> First, NIST is not the NTSB. >>> Second, the NIST makes no such claim. >>> >>>> Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were >>>> all suspended for the day, including the rules of physics. >>> >>> Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the >>> laws of physics were suspended? You would have to. >> >> >> Well, what else is it when a building that is collapsing due to >> asymetrical damage,....doesn't actually fall. >> But just turns to dust in midair. >> > > I'm not aware of any building ever doing such. > >> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when >> they are hijacked >> > > As opposed to the gray color they were? > >> That kind of shit isn't even mentioned in the bible,....as no one >> would have ever believed it. > > Especially since planes and the twin towers didn't exist. > What does the contents of the Bible have to do with your Troofer > religion? > >> So they just stuck to guys who could give life to the dead, and change >> pure water into complex organic molecules >> > > Which has what, exactly, to do with your blind faith in the > Troofer religion? There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion. You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you. And all that you know is in that holy book. "The 9/11 Commision report"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 03:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ne5v0bdndgunpvudlpa41775ecq86cphkp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524220 |
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:42:33 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:20:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the
>>>>>>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National
>>>>>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation
>>>>>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident
>>>>>>>> investigations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since
>>>>>>> they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not
>>>>>>> lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the
>>>>>> law says.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought
>>>>> down the towers, NOT PLANES.
>>>>
>>>> First, NIST is not the NTSB.
>>>> Second, the NIST makes no such claim.
>>>>
>>>>> Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were
>>>>> all suspended for the day, including the rules of physics.
>>>>
>>>> Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the
>>>> laws of physics were suspended? You would have to.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, what else is it when a building that is collapsing due to
>>> asymetrical damage,....doesn't actually fall.
>>> But just turns to dust in midair.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not aware of any building ever doing such.
>>
>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when
>>> they are hijacked
>>>
>>
>> As opposed to the gray color they were?
>>
>>> That kind of shit isn't even mentioned in the bible,....as no one
>>> would have ever believed it.
>>
>> Especially since planes and the twin towers didn't exist.
>> What does the contents of the Bible have to do with your Troofer
>> religion?
>>
>>> So they just stuck to guys who could give life to the dead, and change
>>> pure water into complex organic molecules
>>
>> Which has what, exactly, to do with your blind faith in the
>> Troofer religion?
>
>
>
>
>There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion.
>
Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites
that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself.
>You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you.
Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no.
>And all that you know is in that holy book.
>"The 9/11 Commision report"
What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly
as delusional as you present?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 06:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muoafl$m90$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524358 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:42:33 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:20:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in >>>>>>>>>> the accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National >>>>>>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation >>>>>>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident >>>>>>>>> investigations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since >>>>>>>> they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not >>>>>>>> lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the >>>>>>> law says. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that >>>>>> brought down the towers, NOT PLANES. >>>>> >>>>> First, NIST is not the NTSB. >>>>> Second, the NIST makes no such claim. >>>>> >>>>>> Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were >>>>>> all suspended for the day, including the rules of physics. >>>>> >>>>> Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the >>>>> laws of physics were suspended? You would have to. >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, what else is it when a building that is collapsing due to >>>> asymetrical damage,....doesn't actually fall. >>>> But just turns to dust in midair. >>>> >>> >>> I'm not aware of any building ever doing such. >>> >>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when >>>> they are hijacked >>>> >>> >>> As opposed to the gray color they were? >>> >>>> That kind of shit isn't even mentioned in the bible,....as no one >>>> would have ever believed it. >>> >>> Especially since planes and the twin towers didn't exist. >>> What does the contents of the Bible have to do with your Troofer >>> religion? >>> >>>> So they just stuck to guys who could give life to the dead, and >>>> change pure water into complex organic molecules >>> >>> Which has what, exactly, to do with your blind faith in the >>> Troofer religion? >> >> >> >> >> There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion. >> > > Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites > that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself. > >> You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you. > > Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no. > >> And all that you know is in that holy book. >> "The 9/11 Commision report" > > What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly > as delusional as you present? OMG you deny the holy book of 9/11 report. .....You shall be shunned by other members of the church of the holy 9/11 offical fairytale.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hem01bd92gbl6r3841s8qebtkulh80q4sq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524363 |
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 06:27:56 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:42:33 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:20:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in
>>>>>>>>>>> the accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National
>>>>>>>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation
>>>>>>>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident
>>>>>>>>>> investigations.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since
>>>>>>>>> they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not
>>>>>>>>> lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the
>>>>>>>> law says.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that
>>>>>>> brought down the towers, NOT PLANES.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First, NIST is not the NTSB.
>>>>>> Second, the NIST makes no such claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were
>>>>>>> all suspended for the day, including the rules of physics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the
>>>>>> laws of physics were suspended? You would have to.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, what else is it when a building that is collapsing due to
>>>>> asymetrical damage,....doesn't actually fall.
>>>>> But just turns to dust in midair.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not aware of any building ever doing such.
>>>>
>>>>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when
>>>>> they are hijacked
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to the gray color they were?
>>>>
>>>>> That kind of shit isn't even mentioned in the bible,....as no one
>>>>> would have ever believed it.
>>>>
>>>> Especially since planes and the twin towers didn't exist.
>>>> What does the contents of the Bible have to do with your Troofer
>>>> religion?
>>>>
>>>>> So they just stuck to guys who could give life to the dead, and
>>>>> change pure water into complex organic molecules
>>>>
>>>> Which has what, exactly, to do with your blind faith in the
>>>> Troofer religion?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion.
>>>
>>
>> Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites
>> that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself.
>>
>>> You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you.
>>
>> Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no.
>>
>>> And all that you know is in that holy book.
>>> "The 9/11 Commision report"
>>
>> What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly
>> as delusional as you present?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>OMG you deny the holy book of 9/11 report.
>.....You shall be shunned by other members of the church of the holy 9/11
>offical fairytale.
Your avoidance made me giggle. Now, please answer the questions I
asked.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 05:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mibv0bljfquf9igd56n4l2tgmaop24la1j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524358 |
A CNN reporter on the scene minutes after the explosion occurred COULD NOT SEE any signs of a plane. 9/11 CNN No Plane at Pentagon Original Footage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHWHHid0Pmo This video was confiscated by the FBI in 2002. It was just released after a verdict in a lawsuit. The video shows the Pentagon explosion, but no plane! http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/82934657/ This is good one on how they did it. I think it's too long but the beginning and end are great. They had to add a lot of details in between for proof. Anyway it seems to be on the right track about the Pentagon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxMuW8PzeHY www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3079b3c14aaa59f098c307@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524358 |
In article <ne5v0bdndgunpvudlpa41775ecq86cphkp@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:42:33 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:20:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the > >>>>>>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National > >>>>>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation > >>>>>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident > >>>>>>>> investigations. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since > >>>>>>> they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not > >>>>>>> lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the > >>>>>> law says. > >>>>> > >>>>> Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought > >>>>> down the towers, NOT PLANES. > >>>> > >>>> First, NIST is not the NTSB. > >>>> Second, the NIST makes no such claim. > >>>> > >>>>> Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were > >>>>> all suspended for the day, including the rules of physics. > >>>> > >>>> Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the > >>>> laws of physics were suspended? You would have to. > >>> > >>> > >>> Well, what else is it when a building that is collapsing due to > >>> asymetrical damage,....doesn't actually fall. > >>> But just turns to dust in midair. > >>> > >> > >> I'm not aware of any building ever doing such. > >> > >>> And planes that are primarily shiny silver, turn black instantly when > >>> they are hijacked > >>> > >> > >> As opposed to the gray color they were? > >> > >>> That kind of shit isn't even mentioned in the bible,....as no one > >>> would have ever believed it. > >> > >> Especially since planes and the twin towers didn't exist. > >> What does the contents of the Bible have to do with your Troofer > >> religion? > >> > >>> So they just stuck to guys who could give life to the dead, and change > >>> pure water into complex organic molecules > >> > >> Which has what, exactly, to do with your blind faith in the > >> Troofer religion? > > > > > > > > > >There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion. > > > > Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites > that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself. > > >You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you. > > Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no. > > >And all that you know is in that holy book. > >"The 9/11 Commision report" > > What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly > as delusional as you present? The answer appears to be a definite yes. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 17:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lfm01b1ek8ba31dg89r0uac55r78j7cjij@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524379 |
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:44:09 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> >There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion.
>> >
>>
>> Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites
>> that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself.
>>
>> >You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you.
>>
>> Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no.
>>
>> >And all that you know is in that holy book.
>> >"The 9/11 Commision report"
>>
>> What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly
>> as delusional as you present?
>
>The answer appears to be a definite yes.
Bast certainly puts in a lot of time and effort to provide
evidence of it.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 22:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307a5fc17e65f0a998c309@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524450 |
In article <lfm01b1ek8ba31dg89r0uac55r78j7cjij@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:44:09 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > [...] > > >> >There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion. > >> > > >> > >> Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites > >> that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself. > >> > >> >You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you. > >> > >> Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no. > >> > >> >And all that you know is in that holy book. > >> >"The 9/11 Commision report" > >> > >> What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly > >> as delusional as you present? > > > >The answer appears to be a definite yes. > > Bast certainly puts in a lot of time and effort to provide > evidence of it. She's a die hard Troofer, attempting to "spread the good news", the same as the whack job Christers raving on streetcorners are. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 08:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <U-SdnagPOL5CrYzLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #524465 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.307a5fc17e65f0a998c309@news.giganews.com... > In article <lfm01b1ek8ba31dg89r0uac55r78j7cjij@4ax.com>, > compuelf@gmail.com says... >> >> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:44:09 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> >There is no "truther" book.....You need a book to have a religion. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Since when? While not in paper format, I've seen ample k00k sites >> >> that serve as the religious books of Troofers like yourself. >> >> >> >> >You 9/11 official fairytalers have a book though ,...don't you. >> >> >> >> Since there is no such thing as 9/11 official fairytalers, no. >> >> >> >> >And all that you know is in that holy book. >> >> >"The 9/11 Commision report" >> >> >> >> What do you believe you gain from your lying? Or are you honestly >> >> as delusional as you present? >> > >> >The answer appears to be a definite yes. >> >> Bast certainly puts in a lot of time and effort to provide >> evidence of it. > > She's a die hard Troofer, attempting to "spread the good news", the same > as the whack job Christers raving on streetcorners are. And look at you. You can't even say what 9/11 fairytale of many that you believe in about the missing debris field at the Pentagon or what fairytale of many that you believe in why there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers, or what fairytale of many that you believe in as to why WTC7 had a symmetrical collapse. The reason you refuse to say what fairytale of many you really believe in is the Television Set Huggers like you have so many different fairytales they gave up trying to say what happened a long long time ago like on September 12, 2001. <G> And listen to the following video because it is evidence that WTC7 was a nuclear demolition. He claims to have heard what sounded like a jet engine (the detonation of an underground nuke) he claims to have seen the top of WTC7 shake and that is consistent with underground nukes and if he is talking about the time from the shaking to the time that WTC7 disappeared down then that too is consistent with underground nukes too as proven by what happened with WTC2. 9 11 FDNY LT FRANK PAPALIA SPEAKS ABOUT THE WTC 7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NICPz_I2Z-c Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web