Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #522738 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-22 17:45 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-27 11:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 157 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 17:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Rocky@Lying.Squirrel.com - 2015-09-22 20:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 23:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:46 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:13 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 15:18 -0400
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> Admits he posts lies and False Videos. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 18:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 15:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 17:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 19:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-23 21:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 22:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 09:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 17:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 04:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 10:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-24 18:16 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 20:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 05:39 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 08:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-25 15:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 05:52 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 17:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 11:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 21:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 05:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 06:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 05:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 14:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 13:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 05:49 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 11:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:25 -0500
things that **** y'go noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 16:24 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-25 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 11:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 13:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 18:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-26 23:22 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 20:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 01:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 17:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-27 17:15 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-27 23:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 19:27 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 01:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 22:29 -0500
why not ask wTf not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 12:41 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 16:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 12:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 17:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 22:15 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:33 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 19:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-29 04:52 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 15:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 15:26 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 17:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 20:00 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 23:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 04:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:19 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 18:08 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:20 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-07 09:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 17:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 07:43 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 08:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 10:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 18:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 18:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 21:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-28 13:32 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 14:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-28 22:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 17:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:32 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 20:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 07:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 08:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:48 -0400
Re: Rocky's latest obsession jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 18:03 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 17:56 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-27 14:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-27 17:17 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-28 13:37 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 09:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-28 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-29 15:25 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 08:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 18:17 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 21:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 12:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:46 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 11:38 -0500
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 10:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mu8spk$dle$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523413 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:43:32 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the >>>>> Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that >>>>> has crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see >>>>> are small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no >>>>> large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that >>>>> anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed >>>>> into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>> >>> Technically correct as the airplane crashed INTO the Pentagon with >>> most of the pieces winding up INSIDE the Pentagon, drooling kook. >> >> >> >> >> >> Ohhhh,.....I never thought of that. >> How convienient for you that the reporter .... > > The reporter said, " the entire plane crashed into the side of the > Pentagon ..." > > > > " ..there are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, > nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the > entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the > side to collapse. WRONG AGAIN. Keep watchig it over and over and over until you can keep your attention span on it for the whole minute 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ Are you also one of those "flat earthers" who still refuse to admit they are wrong because of some technicalities they found ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMIid6NVik0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 13:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ht9g0b1aiot8vng31i53ac70ccbvi4p05l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523428 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:02:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:43:32 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the >>>>>> Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that >>>>>> has crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see >>>>>> are small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no >>>>>> large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that >>>>>> anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed >>>>>> into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>>> Technically correct as the airplane crashed INTO the Pentagon with >>>> most of the pieces winding up INSIDE the Pentagon, drooling kook. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ohhhh,.....I never thought of that. >>> How convienient for you that the reporter .... >> >> The reporter said, " the entire plane crashed into the side of the >> Pentagon ..." >> >> >> >> " ..there are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, >> nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the >> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the >> side to collapse. > > > > > > > > > > >WRONG AGAIN. The quote's I've given you come directly from your youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523428 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:02:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>> The reporter said, " the entire plane crashed into the side of the
>> Pentagon ..."
>>
>>
>>
>> " ..there are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage,
>> nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the
>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the
>> side to collapse.
>
>
>
>
>
>WRONG AGAIN.
Sarah is 100% correct.
>Keep watchig it over and over and over until you can keep your attention
>span on it for the whole minute
>
>9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>
Try watching the video one time.
>
>Are you also one of those "flat earthers" who still refuse to admit they are
>wrong because of some technicalities they found ?
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMIid6NVik0
Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with
reality? This is a serious question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 18:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mu9r9i$9lp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523491 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:02:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > [...] > >>> The reporter said, " the entire plane crashed into the side of the >>> Pentagon ..." >>> >>> >>> >>> " ..there are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, >>> nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the >>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the >>> side to collapse. >> >> >> >> >> >> WRONG AGAIN. > > Sarah is 100% correct. > >> Keep watchig it over and over and over until you can keep your >> attention span on it for the whole minute >> >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> > > Try watching the video one time. > >> >> Are you also one of those "flat earthers" who still refuse to admit >> they are wrong because of some technicalities they found ? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMIid6NVik0 > > Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with > reality? This is a serious question. 9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects & Engineers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jkuh0bh5gp57u0d4edeokeksnnp09seqtl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523504 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:42:50 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:02:17 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> The reporter said, " the entire plane crashed into the side of the
>>>> Pentagon ..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> " ..there are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage,
>>>> nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the
>>>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the
>>>> side to collapse.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> WRONG AGAIN.
>>
>> Sarah is 100% correct.
>>
>>> Keep watchig it over and over and over until you can keep your
>>> attention span on it for the whole minute
>>>
>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>>>
>>
>> Try watching the video one time.
>>
>>> Are you also one of those "flat earthers" who still refuse to admit
>>> they are wrong because of some technicalities they found ?
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMIid6NVik0
>>
>> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with
>> reality? This is a serious question.
>
>
>
>9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects & Engineers
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM
That doesn't answer the question I asked.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 18:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ibadnVd0sNNz6JXLnZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523491 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com... > >> >>9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with > reality? This is a serious question. Ok, since we are talking about the Pentagon dig up the one photo with something that appears to come from a 757. Now why is there only one piece and why does that one piece have vegetation on it that is consistent with a crash of a 757 in Brazil? <G> ============================= The fact is the 9/11 Hoaxsters had planted so much evidence that they had to throw a lot of their planted evidence away as proven by the following: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo And the main reason they had to throw that evidence away was there were no exit holes in the South Tower where that could have come from. Meaning the people that placed the thermate cutter charges on the South side of the South Tower to make it look like a plane flew into the South Tower failed to plant thermate cutter charges on the North side of the South Tower to make it look like something flew out too. <G> Not only was 9/11 a badly scripted made for prime time TV movie but they probably had more technical screw-ups than an average movie too. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 21:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jn4h0bhoeguh2ilcnfl59461usk07jfpj6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523510 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:03:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com... >> >> >>>9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> >> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with >> reality? This is a serious question. > >Ok, since we are talking about the Pentagon dig up the one photo with >something that appears to come from a 757. This piece of debris came from American Airlines Flight 77 on 9/11/01. http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Pentagon+Flight+77+Debris&view=detailv2&id=B0EA7B2FE317B38AD56328566435295111DB1DB7&selectedindex=22&ccid=I%2Bfy2KMl&simid=608001395129322246&thid=OIP.M23e7f2d8a325b9e92431ed4a82fd5063H0&mode=overlay&first=1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 13:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mubtfb$6rs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523522 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:03:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com... >>>>> >>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with >>> reality? This is a serious question. >> >> Ok, since we are talking about the Pentagon dig up the one photo with >> something that appears to come from a 757. > > This piece of debris came from American Airlines Flight 77 on 9/11/01. > > http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Pentagon+Flight+77+Debris&view=detailv2&id=B0EA7B2FE317B38AD56328566435295111DB1DB7&selectedindex=22&ccid=I%2Bfy2KMl&simid=608001395129322246&thid=OIP.M23e7f2d8a325b9e92431ed4a82fd5063H0&mode=overlay&first=1 Are you serious ? I can just as easily claim this is from a 1968 buick skylark.....front left fender. And yet THIS is the proof you offer of a 120' wide 40' high, airliner ? ....That can now completely fit in the back of a pickup truck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 14:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6MGdnT1scLdcB5TLnZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523586 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mubtfb$6rs$1@dont-email.me... > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:03:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com... >>>>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with >>>> reality? This is a serious question. >>> >>> Ok, since we are talking about the Pentagon dig up the one photo with >>> something that appears to come from a 757. >> >> This piece of debris came from American Airlines Flight 77 on 9/11/01. >> >> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Pentagon+Flight+77+Debris&view=detailv2&id=B0EA7B2FE317B38AD56328566435295111DB1DB7&selectedindex=22&ccid=I%2Bfy2KMl&simid=608001395129322246&thid=OIP.M23e7f2d8a325b9e92431ed4a82fd5063H0&mode=overlay&first=1 > > > > > > > > Are you serious ? > I can just as easily claim this is from a 1968 buick skylark.....front > left fender. > > And yet THIS is the proof you offer of a 120' wide 40' high, airliner ? > > ....That can now completely fit in the back of a pickup truck Heck it can probably fit in the back seat of a VW Bug and the person that moved it was probably holding a book from the government on how to fake airplane wrecks in his other hand. And the question still remains where is the rest of the jet and why did only that part survive? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 22:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mucef5$5q0$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #523618 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Heck it can probably fit in the back seat of a VW Bug and the person that >moved it was probably holding a book from the government on how to fake >airplane wrecks in his other hand. >And the question still remains where is the rest of the jet and why did only >that part survive? The rest of the jet went into the Pentagon, kook. Since all your kookvids say it didn't, and you have proved to us that all kookvids are full of lies, that, too, must be a lie. So you have proved to us that the plane did in fact crash into the Pentagon, and just about everything went inside! Thanks for proving that fact!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 17:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <NYmdnRgNjLvXIpTLnZ2dnUU7-aOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523664 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mucef5$5q0$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>Heck it can probably fit in the back seat of a VW Bug and the person that >>moved it was probably holding a book from the government on how to fake >>airplane wrecks in his other hand. > >>And the question still remains where is the rest of the jet and why did >>only >>that part survive? > > The rest of the jet went into the Pentagon, kook. Since all your kookvids > say it didn't, and you have proved to us that all kookvids are full of > lies, that, too, must be a lie. So you have proved to us that the plane > did in fact crash into the Pentagon, and just about everything went > inside! Thanks for proving that fact! A long time ago I showed a photo of all sorts of things pulled out of the Pentagon and the debris consisted mostly of desk. The subject of the post was something about the Pentagon was hit by flying desk. So if the rest of the alleged Flight 77 burned up why didn't the desk burn up too and then why was there only one engine found and then what did they bring out of the Pentagon that was covered with a tarp and carried by about 20 people? And why is the time the Pentagon was supposed to have been hit inconsistent with when clocks at the Pentagon stopped? I'll tell you why the times are inconsistent. They originally wanted to blame Flight 93 for the damage done to the Pentagon and if they did that they wouldn't have needed the bogus Flight 77 to make a 270 or 360 degree turn and the times for damage and crash would have matched. See, once again 9/11 was a bad movie with all sorts of screw-ups just like bad movies. And since you have not changed a thing I get to repost the OP: =============================== 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Published on Feb 17, 2013 Video says all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVIEuGWMFDo Wow, the video sure does say it all. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 17:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hddj0btlvih0qmsbj69p1mcrimhm9oipv6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523586 |
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:32:13 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:03:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com... >>>>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with >>>> reality? This is a serious question. >>> >>> Ok, since we are talking about the Pentagon dig up the one photo with >>> something that appears to come from a 757. >> >> This piece of debris came from American Airlines Flight 77 on 9/11/01. >> >> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Pentagon+Flight+77+Debris&view=detailv2&id=B0EA7B2FE317B38AD56328566435295111DB1DB7&selectedindex=22&ccid=I%2Bfy2KMl&simid=608001395129322246&thid=OIP.M23e7f2d8a325b9e92431ed4a82fd5063H0&mode=overlay&first=1 > > >Are you serious ? Yeeep! >I can just as easily claim this is from a 1968 buick skylark.....front left >fender. You could. But then everyone will laugh at your stupidity. The twisted debris in that image of the Pentagon burning is clearly from the AA plane as it has the AA paint scheme. >And yet THIS is the proof you offer of a 120' wide 40' high, airliner ? Noooope! Rocky Raccoon asked for something that came from a 747. I gave him that. Exactly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2luh0bpm144a2rr68vm637qr04ca1one7d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523510 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:03:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:atlg0bd863ek5cocmctdj4ai1hc3m3dbbo@4ax.com...
>> >>
>>>9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>>
>> Do you happen to know the exact time you lost all contact with
>> reality? This is a serious question.
>
>Ok, since we are talking about the Pentagon dig up the one photo with
>something that appears to come from a 757.
>
http://www.thepowerhour.com/images/911_wtc_images/Pentagon091110.jpg
>Now why is there only one piece and why does that one piece have vegetation
>on it that is consistent with a crash of a 757 in Brazil? <G>
>
You keep presenting this LIE about Brazil. When will you offer
your cite for this claim? I've asked for one several times. You've
always run away from the request. You will do so again.
[Snip items unrelated to the Pentagon]
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cntf0blqs642nbsoi92rcraojinmj8psd6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523408 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:43:32 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <SIGH>
>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at
>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured.
>>>>
>>>> Yes I have.
>>>>
>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building
>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy
>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon.
>>>>
>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video:
>>>>
>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has
>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small
>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail
>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around
>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of
>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lets see
>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>>> Pentagon. "
>>
>> Technically correct as the airplane crashed INTO the Pentagon with
>> most of the pieces winding up INSIDE the Pentagon, drooling kook.
>
>
>
>
>
>Ohhhh,.....I never thought of that.
>How convienient for you that the reporter didn't just say "NO EVEIDENCE HERE
>OF ANY PLANES "
>
>Oh wait, He did.
Now you're flat out lying.
>BZZZZZZZZZZT,. Sorry, you don't win the jackpot, but we have a lovely
>consolation prize, and thanks for playing.
>
You have been reduced to lying about what was said. Looks like
you are the loser.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 13:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <50ag0b5gpamgnkih5u1lo8vbqe2v9sfv81@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523430 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:02:31 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:43:32 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >wrote: > >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>> >>> Technically correct as the airplane crashed INTO the Pentagon with >>> most of the pieces winding up INSIDE the Pentagon, drooling kook. >> >> >> >> >> >>Ohhhh,.....I never thought of that. >>How convienient for you that the reporter didn't just say "NO EVEIDENCE HERE >>OF ANY PLANES " >> >>Oh wait, He did. > > Now you're flat out lying. Bast keeps giving us the same video which proves she's lying. >>BZZZZZZZZZZT,. Sorry, you don't win the jackpot, but we have a lovely >>consolation prize, and thanks for playing. >> > > You have been reduced to lying about what was said. Looks like >you are the loser. A big time loser.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jtlg0b9qql6quatnp6qsc73igurkvp0gp3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523462 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:32:50 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
[...]
>>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets see
>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>>>>> Pentagon. "
>>>>
>>>> Technically correct as the airplane crashed INTO the Pentagon with
>>>> most of the pieces winding up INSIDE the Pentagon, drooling kook.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ohhhh,.....I never thought of that.
>>>How convienient for you that the reporter didn't just say "NO EVEIDENCE HERE
>>>OF ANY PLANES "
>>>
>>>Oh wait, He did.
>>
>> Now you're flat out lying.
>
>Bast keeps giving us the same video which proves she's lying.
>
Rocky does something similar with a picture. It actually proves
his claims wrong, but he keeps posting it.
What they think they gain from the constant lying is a mystery.
>>>BZZZZZZZZZZT,. Sorry, you don't win the jackpot, but we have a lovely
>>>consolation prize, and thanks for playing.
>>
>> You have been reduced to lying about what was said. Looks like
>>you are the loser.
>
>A big time loser.
I wonder if Bast is cognizant of this.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 17:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9nldc-an1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523408 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >> >> Technically correct as the airplane crashed INTO the Pentagon with >> most of the pieces winding up INSIDE the Pentagon, drooling kook. > > > > Ohhhh,.....I never thought of that. > How convienient for you that the reporter didn't just say "NO EVEIDENCE HERE > OF ANY PLANES " > > Oh wait, He did. No, raving kook, as has been pointed out to you many times now he did not "just" say that and you continue to ignore the total quote, raving kook. > BZZZZZZZZZZT,. Sorry, you don't win the jackpot, but we have a lovely > consolation prize, and thanks for playing. You have had the utter stupidity of your statements rubbed into your kook face many times now and continuing the lie just shows how fragile your grasp of reality is, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-26 20:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <82fe0bplgui30d5qbo256t515fvfnkigni@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523314 |
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> <SIGH> >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >> >> Yes I have. >> >>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >> >> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >> >> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >> >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >> >> >>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > > >Lets see >" there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >Pentagon. " > That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT of the Pentagon. One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >Ya,.... I can work with that >....NO PLANE > You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 07:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mu8la8$8ks$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523346 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> <SIGH> >>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>> >>> Yes I have. >>> >>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>> >>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>> >>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>> >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>> >>> >>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> >> >> >> >> >> Lets see >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. " >> > > That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have > heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT > of the Pentagon. > > One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. > >> Ya,.... I can work with that >> ....NO PLANE >> > > You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... > > " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of > the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " > > > If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion > you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. > > This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. This is the video you should be referring to 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than the reporter on scene ??? Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, and he only can go by what he actually sees ? You have been proven wrong well over 40 times already. (I have actually lost count) 9/11 was an inside job, and nothing you have said here will ever convince people otherwise
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 08:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oipf0b9dgvnf4anuln49vt6913t6kbdji9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523409 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:54:24 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>> the Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >>> >> >> That's right. Had you actually watched the video you would have >> heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT >> of the Pentagon. >> >> One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>> ....NO PLANE >>> >> >> You'd be better working with the truth as the reporter stated .... >> >> " ...the entire plane crashed into the side of >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >> >> >> If Roger Rocky is smart he'll dump your butt because every discussion >> you get involved with you lose for the Troofers. >> >> This is the THIRD claim you've made which has been proven to be FALSE. > > > > > > > >This is the video you should be referring to > 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > That's the one. > >You now claim the anchor in the studio knows better what happened than the >reporter on scene ??? Had you actually watched the video you would have heard Judy Woodruff's question about a possible plane crashing SHORT of the Pentagon. One did not. It crashed INTO the Pentagon as the Reporter states. >Why ?,.....becuase she's reading from the ofiicial fairytale script, and he >only can go by what he actually sees ? The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. You lose every time you post. You don't even read and/or listen to the cites you link.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web