Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #522011 > unrolled thread

General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2015-09-19 10:36 -0500
Last post2015-09-19 16:32 -0700
Articles 6 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 10:36 -0500
    Re: General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton Jimmie Wynne <jimmwyn@metermap.org> - 2015-09-19 17:02 +0000
    Re: General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:36 -0400
      Re: General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 01:02 -0700
    Re: General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-19 13:34 -0700
    Re: General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton xxein1@att.net - 2015-09-19 16:32 -0700

#522011 — General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-19 10:36 -0500
SubjectGeneral Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton
Message-ID<DZGdnXq5bZ6HHGDInZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4

> A visualization of two physical models of gravity: Newtonian Gravity and Einstein's General Relativity.
>
> Based on illustrations from the book "Relativity Visualized" by Lewis Carroll Epstein:
> http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/d...
> http://books.google.de/books?id=lwZBA...
> and from the doctorate thesis "Gravity Illustrated" by Rickard Jonsson:
> http://www.relativitet.se/Webtheses/t...
>
> An interactive diagram of curved space-time at a larger scale, including the interior of the massive body:
> http://www.adamtoons.de/physics/gravi...


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#522039

FromJimmie Wynne <jimmwyn@metermap.org>
Date2015-09-19 17:02 +0000
Message-ID<mtk4fb$9ik$3@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#522011
Sam Wormley wrote:

> General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4
> 
>> A visualization of two physical models of gravity: Newtonian Gravity
>> and Einstein's General Relativity.

One way or another, Newton is faster than Relativity. Divergent Matter 
beat them both.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522044

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-19 13:36 -0400
Message-ID<E2hLx.21433$Tm4.1168@fx01.iad>
In reply to#522011
On 09/19/2015 11:36 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4
>
>> A visualization of two physical models of gravity: Newtonian Gravity
>> and Einstein's General Relativity.
>>
>> Based on illustrations from the book "Relativity Visualized" by Lewis
>> Carroll Epstein:
>> http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/d...
>> http://books.google.de/books?id=lwZBA...
>> and from the doctorate thesis "Gravity Illustrated" by Rickard Jonsson:
>> http://www.relativitet.se/Webtheses/t...
>>
>> An interactive diagram of curved space-time at a larger scale,
>> including the interior of the massive body:
>> http://www.adamtoons.de/physics/gravi...
>

Sammy, it is the curvature of Space-Temperature that causes "Global 
Warming"!  Get the picture? CO2 curves Space-Temperature!



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522447

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-21 01:02 -0700
Message-ID<b67bacbc-0b05-4603-b6ef-d179231a7e51@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#522044
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 8:36:40 PM UTC+3, benj wrote:
> On 09/19/2015 11:36 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4
> >
> >> A visualization of two physical models of gravity: Newtonian Gravity
> >> and Einstein's General Relativity.
> >>
> >> Based on illustrations from the book "Relativity Visualized" by Lewis
> >> Carroll Epstein:
> >> http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/d...
> >> http://books.google.de/books?id=lwZBA...
> >> and from the doctorate thesis "Gravity Illustrated" by Rickard Jonsson:
> >> http://www.relativitet.se/Webtheses/t...
> >>
> >> An interactive diagram of curved space-time at a larger scale,
> >> including the interior of the massive body:
> >> http://www.adamtoons.de/physics/gravi...
> >
> 
> Sammy, it is the curvature of Space-Temperature that causes "Global 
> Warming"!  Get the picture? CO2 curves Space-Temperature!
> 
> 
> > 
=============================
(:-)!!
see my historic thread:
Google

THE MOMENT THAT CURVED SPACE DIED '

TIA
Y.Porat
================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522093

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2015-09-19 13:34 -0700
Message-ID<mtkgpg$cvt$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#522011
<swormley1@gmail.com> "Sam Wormley" cut and pasted
Einstein Dingleberry cartoons <mercifully snipped because>
Sam posted <http://tinyurl.com/Tears-for-Einsteins-Misery>
in his all time best tripe for SR & GR in, for which one Sam
must be given credit, kudos & at least 5 attaboys!
Taken care Sam! -- hanson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522122

Fromxxein1@att.net
Date2015-09-19 16:32 -0700
Message-ID<118f33e4-fbe7-4807-8fc7-785a4916b129@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#522011
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 11:37:02 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote:
> General Relativity : Einstein vs. Newton
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdC0QN6f3G4
> 
> > A visualization of two physical models of gravity: Newtonian Gravity and Einstein's General Relativity.
> >
> > Based on illustrations from the book "Relativity Visualized" by Lewis Carroll Epstein:
> > http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb/d...
> > http://books.google.de/books?id=lwZBA...
> > and from the doctorate thesis "Gravity Illustrated" by Rickard Jonsson:
> > http://www.relativitet.se/Webtheses/t...
> >
> > An interactive diagram of curved space-time at a larger scale, including the interior of the massive body:
> > http://www.adamtoons.de/physics/gravi...
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

xxein:  Epstein was a valuable resource to me.  He gave me an intuitive approach to help me understand relativity better.  BUT, he couldn't intuitively explain to me how the speed of light could be the same in all frames of reference.  I found out later that the reports of such are bastardizations of what Einstein wrote for his 2nd postulate and that they use the words 'observed' and 'measured'.  I have no complaint regarding what Einstein actually wrote.  I do complain about how it is measured (TWLS and the assumption used to set clocks to measure it).  I find the argument inherently circular.  It is presupposed that that OWLS is c to set the clocks in the first place to prove that OWLS is c.  Long story short, it forced me to re-evaluate the foundations of Einstein's SR theory.

And, sure, there is a difference between Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity but they share the fact that neither is correct.  This caused me to hunt for what gravity really is.  And it had to be compliant with my restructuring of SR.  That proved to be a difficult task.  I almost gave up.  I should say that I did give up several times without a clue... until a stupid thought entered my mind.  It couldn't possibly work but it did.  It extends the defined into the previously undefined and it is so simple.  It is intuitive to boot.

In the end, nothing can prove it wrong except for a belief wrought in another imagination.  Dare to look behind the curtain.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web