Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 175 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 11:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 16:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 12:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 09:04 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:57 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-17 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-17 19:45 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 09:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-19 13:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 12:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 12:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 20:33 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 21:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 08:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 10:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 17:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 07:56 +0200
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 01:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-19 20:32 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-20 15:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-21 13:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:24 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 18:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 22:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 06:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 14:05 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 14:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 00:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 14:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 22:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 14:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 23:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 02:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( the Ediot forgets a link I gave him earlier ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 01:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <74hrcc-fi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521661 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>> >>> Thanks and cool video >> >> Obviously a kook video. >> >> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. > > > > > > > Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any > passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. An utter lie. There are many, many sworn statements to the contrary, lunatic. <snip useless babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 16:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtf76v$6kt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521689 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>> >>>> Thanks and cool video >>> >>> Obviously a kook video. >>> >>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any >> passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. > > An utter lie. > > There are many, many sworn statements to the contrary, lunatic. > > <snip useless babble> Reposting the evidence that makes jimps knees knock Sorry jimp, your delete button doesn't change history ...... Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. But many saw what they claimed appeared to be small jets without windows. or in the case of the second tower,... nothing at all other than an explosion Like this https://www.google.com/search?q=cruise+missile&biw=1783&bih=768&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMIx7amstb-xwIVjhWSCh28rw3i Listen and watch as they tell you themselves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2vkrcc-t11.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521694 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and cool video >>>> >>>> Obviously a kook video. >>>> >>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any >>> passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. >> >> An utter lie. >> >> There are many, many sworn statements to the contrary, lunatic. >> <snip useless babble> > > > > Reposting the evidence that makes jimps knees knock Nope, shake with laughter at your lunatic drivel, and bat crazy delusions. <snip repeated lie and kook video link> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 03:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtg0bc$ro7$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #521694 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any >passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. Now that's really kooktarded. Thousands of people would have looked up when they heard the planes, low and under full power, approaching. And thousands were already staring at the Twin Towers when the second plane hit. Does anyone have a transcript of the Zacarias Moussaoui trial? I bet there were prosecution witnesses who testified under oath that they saw one (or both) planes strike the Twin Towers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HZGdnR_-maSHv2HInZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521769 |
Again Bast only sees post on alt.astronomy "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtg0bc$ro7$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any >>passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. > > Now that's really kooktarded. Thousands of people would have looked up > when they heard the planes, low and under full power, approaching. And > thousands were already staring at the Twin Towers when the second plane > hit. But the first jet didn't make a sound as proven by recordings taken at the time of the first big explosion. Not only did they add the CGI to the Naudet Brother's video but the sound track was obviously bogus too. DUH. And the sound of the jet when the South Tower was hit kept going and going and going because the sound didn't come form a jet but from a buzz machine on the ground that they left running a little bit too long. <G> > Does anyone have a transcript of the Zacarias Moussaoui trial? I bet > there were prosecution witnesses who testified under oath that they saw > one (or both) planes strike the Twin Towers. I don't know about the transcript itself but I know you can download the exhibits from that trial so I'd think you get the transcript too. All it takes is someone who can figure out patterns. If there was no real jet at Pranksville, PA and no real jet at the Pentagon then why would there be real jets in Nuke York City? DUH Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tq7qva97rlnsraurngge3b4qq5tt3vnlej@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521812 |
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:38:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>Again Bast only sees post on alt.astronomy
>
It must suck to be Bast more than usual then.
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:mtg0bc$ro7$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>
>>>Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any
>>>passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV.
>>
>> Now that's really kooktarded. Thousands of people would have looked up
>> when they heard the planes, low and under full power, approaching. And
>> thousands were already staring at the Twin Towers when the second plane
>> hit.
>
>But the first jet didn't make a sound as proven by recordings taken at the
>time of the first big explosion.
Yet hundreds of thousands of people heard it. Odd that.
How do you explain away this TRUTH?
>Not only did they add the CGI to the
>Naudet Brother's video but the sound track was obviously bogus too. DUH.
You've helped to prove there was no CGI.
>
>And the sound of the jet when the South Tower was hit kept going and going
>and going because the sound didn't come form a jet but from a buzz machine
>on the ground that they left running a little bit too long. <G>
This is a new claim to me. Where is your k00k cites for the
claim?
>
>> Does anyone have a transcript of the Zacarias Moussaoui trial? I bet
>> there were prosecution witnesses who testified under oath that they saw
>> one (or both) planes strike the Twin Towers.
>
>I don't know about the transcript itself but I know you can download the
>exhibits from that trial so I'd think you get the transcript too.
>
>All it takes is someone who can figure out patterns. If there was no real
>jet at Pranksville, PA and no real jet at the Pentagon then why would there
>be real jets in Nuke York City? DUH
Sadly, there was a real jet in Shankville. And a real jet at the
Pentagon. As such, you've again proved there were jets that hit the
twin towers.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 09:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.306729f097ac5b5798c2bc@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521962 |
In article <tq7qva97rlnsraurngge3b4qq5tt3vnlej@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:38:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > >Again Bast only sees post on alt.astronomy > > > > It must suck to be Bast more than usual then. > > >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > >news:mtg0bc$ro7$2@pcls7.std.com... > >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >> > >>>Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any > >>>passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. > >> > >> Now that's really kooktarded. Thousands of people would have looked up > >> when they heard the planes, low and under full power, approaching. And > >> thousands were already staring at the Twin Towers when the second plane > >> hit. > > > >But the first jet didn't make a sound as proven by recordings taken at the > >time of the first big explosion. > > Yet hundreds of thousands of people heard it. Odd that. > How do you explain away this TRUTH? > > >Not only did they add the CGI to the > >Naudet Brother's video but the sound track was obviously bogus too. DUH. > > You've helped to prove there was no CGI. > > > > >And the sound of the jet when the South Tower was hit kept going and going > >and going because the sound didn't come form a jet but from a buzz machine > >on the ground that they left running a little bit too long. <G> > > This is a new claim to me. Where is your k00k cites for the > claim? What is the make and model of the "buzz machine"? I still don't believe Rocky is as dumb as he seems to be. And what is a "buzz machine"? > > > > >> Does anyone have a transcript of the Zacarias Moussaoui trial? I bet > >> there were prosecution witnesses who testified under oath that they saw > >> one (or both) planes strike the Twin Towers. > > > >I don't know about the transcript itself but I know you can download the > >exhibits from that trial so I'd think you get the transcript too. > > > >All it takes is someone who can figure out patterns. If there was no real > >jet at Pranksville, PA and no real jet at the Pentagon then why would there > >be real jets in Nuke York City? DUH > > Sadly, there was a real jet in Shankville. And a real jet at the > Pentagon. As such, you've again proved there were jets that hit the > twin towers. > > "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their > belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." > Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used > on 9/11/01 in > Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fc3rva5u0be22a89tnnja86be9kephgfjv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521991 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 09:15:14 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <tq7qva97rlnsraurngge3b4qq5tt3vnlej@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:38:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Again Bast only sees post on alt.astronomy
>>
>> It must suck to be Bast more than usual then.
>>
>> >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> >news:mtg0bc$ro7$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>> >>
>> >>>Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any
>> >>>passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV.
>> >>
>> >> Now that's really kooktarded. Thousands of people would have looked up
>> >> when they heard the planes, low and under full power, approaching. And
>> >> thousands were already staring at the Twin Towers when the second plane
>> >> hit.
>> >
>> >But the first jet didn't make a sound as proven by recordings taken at the
>> >time of the first big explosion.
>>
>> Yet hundreds of thousands of people heard it. Odd that.
>> How do you explain away this TRUTH?
>>
>> >Not only did they add the CGI to the
>> >Naudet Brother's video but the sound track was obviously bogus too. DUH.
>>
>> You've helped to prove there was no CGI.
>>
>> >And the sound of the jet when the South Tower was hit kept going and going
>> >and going because the sound didn't come form a jet but from a buzz machine
>> >on the ground that they left running a little bit too long. <G>
>>
>> This is a new claim to me. Where is your k00k cites for the
>> claim?
>
>What is the make and model of the "buzz machine"? I still don't believe
>Rocky is as dumb as he seems to be. And what is a "buzz machine"?
There is no such thing, of course. Rocky will help to prove his
lie in time.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 17:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mteuuk$o40$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #521637 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 > ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) > https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s That video clip with the crane has definitely been tampered with, kooktard. Did you think nobody would notice?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 13:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jPSdnXquo-D7m2bInZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521659 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mteuuk$o40$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >>dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: > >>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s > > That video clip with the crane has definitely been tampered with, > kooktard. Did you think nobody would notice? ROTFLMAO because a lot of people including you failed to notice that there are at least two distinct CGIs as if there were at least two different groups falsifying videos. And do not forget the most important thing and that is the total lack of crash dynamics tells us it was just a crash of pixels and nothing more than a bogus crash that used a lot of napalm. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 21:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <shsmva9c9t5futrahhbjuhveckq8k302i5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521663 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:28:02 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:mteuuk$o40$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only
>>>dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See:
>>
>>>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s
>>
>> That video clip with the crane has definitely been tampered with,
>> kooktard. Did you think nobody would notice?
>
>ROTFLMAO because a lot of people including you failed to notice that there
>are at least two distinct CGIs as if there were at least two different
>groups falsifying videos.
>
I see CGI making it look as if the plane is in front of the lines
from the crane. Is that what you mean?
BTW, whoever did the CGI work didn't do a very good job. Jar Jar
Binks was more realistic.
>And do not forget the most important thing and that is the total lack of
>crash dynamics tells us it was just a crash of pixels and nothing more than
>a bogus crash that used a lot of napalm.
>
I'm still waiting for your evidence of napalm. Oh wait, you
already offered the default admission that your claim was a lie.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:25 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) |
| Message-ID | <osSdnYRoY_2fgmHInZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521759 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:shsmva9c9t5futrahhbjuhveckq8k302i5@4ax.com... > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:28:02 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mteuuk$o40$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>>Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >>>>dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>> >>>>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>> >>> That video clip with the crane has definitely been tampered with, >>> kooktard. Did you think nobody would notice? >> >>ROTFLMAO because a lot of people including you failed to notice that there >>are at least two distinct CGIs as if there were at least two different >>groups falsifying videos. >> > > I see CGI making it look as if the plane is in front of the lines > from the crane. Is that what you mean? That is because the 3D layout the perpetraitors had for Nuke York City only had buildings in them and not the crane. > BTW, whoever did the CGI work didn't do a very good job. Jar Jar > Binks was more realistic. > >>And do not forget the most important thing and that is the total lack of >>crash dynamics tells us it was just a crash of pixels and nothing more >>than >>a bogus crash that used a lot of napalm. >> > > I'm still waiting for your evidence of napalm. Oh wait, you > already offered the default admission that your claim was a lie. LIAR LIAR LIAR. I stated if you want to see the consistancies between napalm and the Twin Tower explosions just look up napalm with google. Man you lie and lie and lie. > "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their > belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." > Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used > on 9/11/01 in > Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) |
| Message-ID | <mthk71$b2r$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521810 |
On 18/09/2015 15:25, Rocky wrote: > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:shsmva9c9t5futrahhbjuhveckq8k302i5@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:28:02 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:mteuuk$o40$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >>>>> dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>>> >>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>> >>>> That video clip with the crane has definitely been tampered with, >>>> kooktard. Did you think nobody would notice? >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because a lot of people including you failed to notice that there >>> are at least two distinct CGIs as if there were at least two different >>> groups falsifying videos. >>> >> >> I see CGI making it look as if the plane is in front of the lines >> from the crane. Is that what you mean? > > That is because the 3D layout the perpetraitors had for Nuke York City only > had buildings in them and not the crane. > >> BTW, whoever did the CGI work didn't do a very good job. Jar Jar >> Binks was more realistic. >> >>> And do not forget the most important thing and that is the total lack of >>> crash dynamics tells us it was just a crash of pixels and nothing more >>> than >>> a bogus crash that used a lot of napalm. >>> >> >> I'm still waiting for your evidence of napalm. Oh wait, you >> already offered the default admission that your claim was a lie. > > LIAR LIAR LIAR. I stated if you want to see the consistancies between > napalm and the Twin Tower explosions just look up napalm with google. Man > you lie and lie and lie. > So your evidence is to tell somebody else to provide evidence for you, what a quaint idea. So you have just admitted you did not provide the evidence asked for, so that makes you again a fraud & a liar. You are so funny. >> "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their >> belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." >> Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used >> on 9/11/01 in >> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> > > I await on of your usual evasive replies, if you bother. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) |
| Message-ID | <gt7qvat9oqeb843c7u08uhhlq59tolk6cu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521810 |
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:25:15 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:shsmva9c9t5futrahhbjuhveckq8k302i5@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:28:02 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:mteuuk$o40$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only
>>>>>dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See:
>>>>
>>>>>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
>>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
>>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s
>>>>
>>>> That video clip with the crane has definitely been tampered with,
>>>> kooktard. Did you think nobody would notice?
>>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because a lot of people including you failed to notice that there
>>>are at least two distinct CGIs as if there were at least two different
>>>groups falsifying videos.
>>
>> I see CGI making it look as if the plane is in front of the lines
>> from the crane. Is that what you mean?
>
>That is because the 3D layout the perpetraitors had for Nuke York City only
>had buildings in them and not the crane.
>
So you admit the video to which you linked was altered? It
appears as if this is the claim you are making.
There is hope for you yet.
>> BTW, whoever did the CGI work didn't do a very good job. Jar Jar
>> Binks was more realistic.
>>
>>>And do not forget the most important thing and that is the total lack of
>>>crash dynamics tells us it was just a crash of pixels and nothing more
>>>than a bogus crash that used a lot of napalm.
>>
>> I'm still waiting for your evidence of napalm. Oh wait, you
>> already offered the default admission that your claim was a lie.
>
>LIAR LIAR LIAR. I stated if you want to see the consistancies between
>napalm and the Twin Tower explosions just look up napalm with google. Man
>you lie and lie and lie.
>
And I'm still waiting...
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 19:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mtf1kg$c04$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521637 |
On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 > > Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The Ediot, > Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, Sual, Hagbor > and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the Roadrunner because > those two are the only two with the credentials that they believe as proven > by they still think the CGIs were real. <G> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner > > Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only > dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: > > Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 > ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) > https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s > > Rocky > > Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question that you can't answer? As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the plane hitting the tower? Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all mistaken? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 15:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtf46u$pok$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521668 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The >> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, >> Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the >> Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials >> that they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. <G> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >> >> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >> dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >> >> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question > that you can't answer? > > As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the plane > hitting the tower? > > Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all > mistaken? Absolutely not. I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into dust. And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers. BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it fell just the same. So what was the cause of WTC 7 collapsing ?????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 19:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0ahrcc-fi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521682 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>> >>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The >>> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, >>> Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the >>> Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials >>> that they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. <G> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>> >>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >>> dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>> >>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question >> that you can't answer? >> >> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the plane >> hitting the tower? >> >> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they all >> mistaken? > > > > Absolutely not. > I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, and > then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into dust. > > And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, UFO's, > zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers. > > BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and it fell > just the same. You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 16:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtf63t$1vt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521690 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>> >>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The >>>> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, >>>> Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the >>>> Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials >>>> that they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. >>>> <G> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>> >>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos >>>> only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>>> >>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question >>> that you can't answer? >>> >>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the plane >>> hitting the tower? >>> >>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they >>> all mistaken? >> >> >> >> Absolutely not. >> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, >> and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into >> dust. >> >> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers. >> >> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >> it fell just the same. > > You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other hitting WTC 7 ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 20:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vokrcc-t11.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521691 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The >>>>> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, >>>>> Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the >>>>> Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials >>>>> that they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. >>>>> <G> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>>> >>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos >>>>> only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>>>> >>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question >>>> that you can't answer? >>>> >>>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the plane >>>> hitting the tower? >>>> >>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they >>>> all mistaken? >>> >>> >>> >>> Absolutely not. >>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their eye, >>> and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings disolving into >>> dust. >>> >>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers. >>> >>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>> it fell just the same. >> >> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? > > > > > Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other hitting > WTC 7 You didn't hear about the collapse of the North Tower dropping heavy debris and starting fires, kook? That sort of figures as you are in your own little kook world. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mth3ul$91t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521703 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The >>>>>> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, >>>>>> Michael, Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E >>>>>> Coyote or the Roadrunner because those two are the only two with >>>>>> the credentials that they believe as proven by they still think >>>>>> the CGIs were real. <G> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos >>>>>> only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>>>>> >>>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question >>>>> that you can't answer? >>>>> >>>>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the >>>>> plane hitting the tower? >>>>> >>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they >>>>> all mistaken? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Absolutely not. >>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their >>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings >>>> disolving into dust. >>>> >>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>> towers. >>>> >>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>> it fell just the same. >>> >>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >> >> >> >> >> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >> hitting WTC 7 > > You didn't hear about the collapse of the North Tower dropping heavy > debris and starting fires, kook? > > That sort of figures as you are in your own little kook world. Nope, but not only did I not see it. No one with a camera that day did either Which is why you have to rely on urban legends and not photgraphs, that most certainly would have been in all the papers the next day. As well as the 9/11 commission report. BUT,....it wasn't BTW,......also please tell us what happened to the NYC sewer alligators ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web