Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520362 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-11 14:24 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-12 13:58 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 81 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 14:24 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:04 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:16 +0000
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:23 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:42 +0000
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-11 23:04 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 06:51 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 10:13 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-11 22:35 +0200
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:48 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:07 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 18:40 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:57 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:41 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 19:18 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 18:30 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 21:26 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:07 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:14 +0000
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:11 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:36 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:44 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:29 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:51 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:09 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:23 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:37 -0400
Re: Rocky's imaginary missle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Rocky's imaginary missle Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:06 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 21:27 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:41 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 01:40 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:34 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:03 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:24 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:30 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:59 -0400
Re: Rocky's imaginary missile jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:59 +0000
Re: Rocky's imaginary missile moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 15:00 +0000
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:44 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 18:19 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 17:31 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 18:56 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:35 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:59 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 19:19 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 20:51 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 22:32 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:07 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:16 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:44 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:08 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:10 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:30 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:46 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:53 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 11:12 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 12:32 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:37 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:36 -0500
Re: Rocky stumped jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:46 +0000
Re: Rocky's legal woes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:52 +0000
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 23:58 +0100
Re: Rocky's newst delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:50 +0000
Re: Backed into a corner, Rocky lashes out jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:01 +0000
Re: Rocky's imaginary missle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:56 +0000
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-14 08:42 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:32 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 09:29 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 15:32 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-14 10:44 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 09:33 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-17 10:33 -0400
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 22:47 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( plus other media fcuk ups ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 23:42 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Gov Shit can't even keep his stories straight ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:59 -0500
Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-12 13:58 -0400
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 11:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) |
| Message-ID | <npidnUu-CeOQb2vInZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521057 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:07rdva18b1k6c3m19m3mhpcuopvf9cbthc@4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:46:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have an answer to the question yet? Your video doesn't say >>>>>>> what missile and platform. >>>>>> >>>>>>That video said what missile, it had a photo of it, it also pointed >>>>>>out that >>>>>>missile is designed to be launched from a ship >>>>> >>>>> No. No. No. It showed nothing of the sort. >>>> >>>>Prove it. >>>> >>> >>> It's YOUR cite. It's yours to prove. >> >>But it is your bullshit so you have to prove it. > > Missile type and platform is YOUR claim. You have not provided me with a valid reason that I have to transcribe videos to text for you. Besides I can see from other post of yours that you are a pathological liar just like you have already proven to me over and over and over. But I will do this for you, the part of the video in question that proves you are a consistent pathological liar starts at 25:25. Oh, and on the subject of pathological liars Kid Wills is one too and he even goes so far as to lie about his lies and then lie about those lies. Good gaud he is certainly a 9/11 hoaxster since he has been caught up in the shit load of lies that they started. And since the 9/11 lies can be equated to movie blunders I'll call them movie blunders instead. See: news:oM2dnQJvLsOYSmvInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com... And if clicking on the link above does not pull up the post then try to right click on the link, "Copy Shortcut" and then paste into Firefox. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 12:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) |
| Message-ID | <4htdva1ib1i7sli6gvbv49lamh7a26uh9f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521062 |
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:12:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:07rdva18b1k6c3m19m3mhpcuopvf9cbthc@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:46:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you have an answer to the question yet? Your video doesn't say >>>>>>>> what missile and platform. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That video said what missile, it had a photo of it, it also pointed >>>>>>>out that >>>>>>>missile is designed to be launched from a ship >>>>>> >>>>>> No. No. No. It showed nothing of the sort. >>>>> >>>>>Prove it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's YOUR cite. It's yours to prove. >>> >>>But it is your bullshit so you have to prove it. >> >> Missile type and platform is YOUR claim. > >You have not provided me with a valid reason that I have to transcribe >videos to text for you. You claim the video identifies the missile and platform. So what are they? Just type what the video claims is the missile type and platform. Simple, even for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 18:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) |
| Message-ID | <9gmeva9pn7c8l2jburlv6rlo25k8lp7m3l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521062 |
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:12:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:07rdva18b1k6c3m19m3mhpcuopvf9cbthc@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:46:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have an answer to the question yet? Your video doesn't say
>>>>>>>> what missile and platform.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That video said what missile, it had a photo of it, it also pointed
>>>>>>>out that
>>>>>>>missile is designed to be launched from a ship
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. No. No. It showed nothing of the sort.
>>>>>
>>>>>Prove it.
>>>>
>>>> It's YOUR cite. It's yours to prove.
>>>
>>>But it is your bullshit so you have to prove it.
>>
>> Missile type and platform is YOUR claim.
>
>You have not provided me with a valid reason that I have to transcribe
>videos to text for you.
>
It is fortunate that she's not asked you to do so.
>Besides I can see from other post of yours that you are a pathological liar
>just like you have already proven to me over and over and over.
>
Your continued use of projection continues to fail.
[snip further projection.]
Get the professional mental health care you NEED.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he claims nukes were used on
9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 18:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) |
| Message-ID | <bfmevadeabb8fpbmthfa49si079vunrc6h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521012 |
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:16:36 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:fehdval8motdgl255e5til7cb33fh02pcq@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:32:23 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:455cvatqtd7qe6ledkooovjriuf9q56m9n@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:19:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:uo2cvap8vfuhsthctsnb9khaigcv6ftu7j@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>If you can lie about the jury trial I won 12 to 0 then you can lie about
>>>>>anything.
>>>
>>>Sarah?
>>>
>>>>>Sort of like you can lie about why there was no jet in the wide shot
>>>>>yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Besides the fact your sentence is a little screwy you're both
>>>> delusional and confused because I've made no comment to you , and
>>>> probably to anyone else, about a jet at the WTC. You've been dealing
>>>> with someone else here on that issue.
>>>
>>>Nope, I was dealing with
>>
>> Missile type and platform. That's what you and I are discussing.
>>
>> Do you have an answer to the question yet? Your video doesn't say
>> what missile and platform.
>
>I get to do the exact thing that NIST did to explain why 3 buildings fell as
>fast as if they were brought down on purpose.
>
How many buildings do your mental defect(s) believe make up the
Pentagon?
[...]
>
>And here is the MID so you can see Kid's lies about his lies for yourself:
> news:rYydnYqYhPyzWmvInZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com...
>
If by Kid you mean me, I don't use giganews. As such, any lies
found within the post can't be from me.
I note YOU used giganews. You must be admitting that you were
caught lying. And you were. I am, however, surprised to see you admit
it and offer PROOF that you were caught lying.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he claims nukes were used on
9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 00:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky stumped |
| Message-ID | <vvhhcc-h2p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520882 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:uo2cvap8vfuhsthctsnb9khaigcv6ftu7j@4ax.com... > > If you can lie about the jury trial I won 12 to 0 then you can lie about > anything. The "lies" are just another of your delusions, kook. Why can't you answer the question: what type of missile and what platform? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's legal woes |
| Message-ID | <uqehcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520860 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > I don't want to deal with another pathological liar like Beverly Rusk, the > judges that refused to apply the definition of probable cause in my > Malicious Prosecution lawsuit Probable cause does not apply to civil lawsuites, delusional kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) |
| Message-ID | <mt4uuq$91o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520828 |
On 13/09/2015 23:31, Rocky wrote: > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:43tbval58t0la62c188ahl3d2mo4vrprp8@4ax.com... > > So you just told me that you are free to lie about me whenever you want to. > > Fine, go ahead and have fun being in the same boat as jimp and the Friendly > Neighborhood Nut while I keep counting the lies told by Kid Wills and I > reached 7 on the day I started count. > > Just for a quick run down on the Kid's two biggest lies. > > The math on the missing jet in the wide shot from Chopper 5 proves Kid lies > about the media using CGIs. > > When Kid tried to say nobody said WTC7 collapsed by fire alone was proven to > be a big lie by NIST itself. > So what caused the fires in WTC7? Did they just start on their own. Or was WTC7 damaged by debris? Please tell me. > The fact is Kid has to stoop to using lies to defend the lies told by the > media and he is too stupid to see that. > > Oh, talking about too stupid. Hi Sarah. Bye Sarah. > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's newst delusions |
| Message-ID | <umehcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520828 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > When Kid tried to say nobody said WTC7 collapsed by fire alone was proven to > be a big lie by NIST itself. Yes Rocky, the NIST just ignored all facts about the jets, you delusional kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Backed into a corner, Rocky lashes out |
| Message-ID | <7rbhcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520814 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:qaqbva579omfho4u8t20u5609hlf4m6cr7@4ax.com... > > Oh, try to report me to my ISP because I'll prove that you have posted false > information about the jury trial I won 12 to 0 and I'll just point out you > can't stop being a liar, a stalker and a heckler. That should be even more laughable than your last attempted suite, kook. What missle type and platform, babbling kook; it isn't mentioned in you kook video. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 22:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's imaginary missle |
| Message-ID | <phbhcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520798 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:fbnbvah0dld6gcs5kjcnks76bg8qtcjvdb@4ax.com... > > Nothing you say matters after I caught you in two outright lies about the > jury trial that I won 12 to 0 without even having an attorney in court to > represent me. Backed into a corner by his delusion, Rocky attempts to run. What kind of missile and platform was that in your delusion, fuckwit? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 08:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mt6f94$j33$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520789 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Czepiel wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey Kid, >>>>> >>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile? >>>>> I responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform? >>>>> >>>>> No answer yet. And you're demanding proof from others. >>>>> >>>>> Get cracking Roger. Answer the questions: What kind of cruise >>>>> missile and launch platform? >>>> >>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ? >>>> It's in between the frames. >>> >>> What missile and what platform? It is a simple question yet not one >>> of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer. >>> >>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you >>> have no argument. >>> >>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane crashed >>> into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. >>> >>> QED >> >> >> No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman. > > > Then what missile and what platform? > >> But be sure to come back and play our game again. > > Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger. I have no need or patiece to play games,....you on the other hand seem to think that insults and slander can make your case for the 9/11 official fairytale. But that won't work with me. Sweetcheeks. It's quite evident that no one with any credibility saw your "jets" unless they were watching TV. As this CNN reporter makes quite clear 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ And ask yourself why the feds kept this private video hidden away for years. Although the answer should be obvious,....It goes against the fairytale, since there was NO PLANE 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 10:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vimdvahfvjs4cvpcql9vq4nhrbc6l1pb22@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521001 |
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:42:38 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Czepiel wrote: >>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Kid, >>>>>> >>>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile? >>>>>> I responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform? >>>>>> >>>>>> No answer yet. And you're demanding proof from others. >>>>>> >>>>>> Get cracking Roger. Answer the questions: What kind of cruise >>>>>> missile and launch platform? >>>>> >>>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ? >>>>> It's in between the frames. >>>> >>>> What missile and what platform? It is a simple question yet not one >>>> of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer. >>>> >>>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you >>>> have no argument. >>>> >>>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane crashed >>>> into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. >>>> >>>> QED >>> >>> >>> No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman. >> >> >> Then what missile and what platform? >> >>> But be sure to come back and play our game again. >> >> Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger. > >I have no need or patiece to play games,.... Then answer the question: What missile and platform? >you on the other hand seem to think that insults and slander can make your case for the 9/11 official >fairytale. But that won't work with me. Sweetcheeks. > It's quite evident that no one with any credibility saw your "jets" unless >they were watching TV. Why do you and Roger both think I'm discussing the WTC? I'm not. Never was with you OR Roger. The Pentagon. What missile and platform? >As this CNN reporter makes quite clear " The only site is the actual side of the building which is crashed in ...." >9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ Did you look and listen to this video? CNN host says Reporter Bob Franken [?] spoke with an eyewitness who thought " that Boeing ( sounds like she says 757 ) the American jet, the American Airlines jet landed short of the Pentagon. Can you give us any better idea how much of the plane actually impacted the building? " The CNN reporter states " You know it might have appeared that way but from my close up inspection there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building which is crashed in ...." >And ask yourself why the feds kept this private video hidden away for years. >Although the answer should be obvious,....It goes against the fairytale, >since there was NO PLANE > > >9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY That video was taken from street level at the Doubletree Hotel in Crystal City. Look at a map. You can't see the Pentagon from that vantage point. You can barely make out box trucks on 395/95.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 09:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtef7d$hf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521030 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:42:38 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Czepiel wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Kid, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise >>>>>>> missile? I responded asking what kind of cruise missile and >>>>>>> launch platform? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No answer yet. And you're demanding proof from others. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get cracking Roger. Answer the questions: What kind of cruise >>>>>>> missile and launch platform? >>>>>> >>>>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ? >>>>>> It's in between the frames. >>>>> >>>>> What missile and what platform? It is a simple question yet not >>>>> one of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer. >>>>> >>>>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you >>>>> have no argument. >>>>> >>>>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane >>>>> crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. >>>>> >>>>> QED >>>> >>>> >>>> No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman. >>> >>> >>> Then what missile and what platform? >>> >>>> But be sure to come back and play our game again. >>> >>> Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger. >> >> I have no need or patiece to play games,.... > > Then answer the question: What missile and platform? > >> you on the other hand seem to think that insults and slander can make >> your case for the 9/11 official fairytale. But that won't work with >> me. Sweetcheeks. >> It's quite evident that no one with any credibility saw your "jets" >> unless >> they were watching TV. > > Why do you and Roger both think I'm discussing the WTC? I'm not. > Never was with you OR Roger. > > The Pentagon. > > What missile and platform? > > >> As this CNN reporter makes quite clear > > " The only site is the actual side of the building which is crashed in > ...." > > >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > Did you look and listen to this video? > > CNN host says Reporter Bob Franken [?] spoke with an eyewitness who > thought " that Boeing ( sounds like she says 757 ) the American jet, > the American Airlines jet landed short of the Pentagon. Can you give > us any better idea how much of the plane actually impacted the > building? " > > The CNN reporter states " You know it might have appeared that way but > from my close up inspection there is no evidence of a plane having > crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual side > of the building which is crashed in ...." > > >> And ask yourself why the feds kept this private video hidden away for >> years. >> Although the answer should be obvious,....It goes against the >> fairytale, >> since there was NO PLANE >> >> >> 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY > > That video was taken from street level at the Doubletree Hotel in > Crystal City. Look at a map. You can't see the Pentagon from that > vantage point. You can barely make out box trucks on 395/95. Now you are starting to clue in. That you can see no +100' wide 40' high plane at all Yet you can "barely" make out "box trucks", that would easily be less the half the size of the alleged plane Have you got it yet, or do you still need it explained ? ....No matter where it's taken from, that a plane you claim of that size is invisible, yet you can identify trucks half the size,... just doesn't make any sense. Only if it was a missile does your scenario make sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 15:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <rh4mva9s75pr5814dnrfmggs14oldv7rq3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521629 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:29:22 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY >> >> That video was taken from street level at the Doubletree Hotel in >> Crystal City. Look at a map. You can't see the Pentagon from that >> vantage point. You can barely make out box trucks on 395/95. > > >Now you are starting to clue in. That you keep using youtube video's which don't support you kook klames? >That you can see no +100' wide 40' high plane at all >Yet you can "barely" make out "box trucks", that would easily be less the >half the size of the alleged plane >Have you got it yet, or do you still need it explained ? Look at the video again. Rte 395 is elevated. You can see that in the video. You see the trucks but no cars because the camera angle is coming from lower than the highway. All you've done is confirm this youtube video is essentially worthless. >....No matter where it's taken from, And here is the admittance that false klames are your truth. >Only if it was a missile does your scenario make sense. Missile type and platform.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 10:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3060a7622cd67f4598c2a0@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521001 |
In article <mt6f94$j33$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Sarah Czepiel wrote: > >>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey Kid, > >>>>> > >>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile? > >>>>> I responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform? > >>>>> > >>>>> No answer yet. And you're demanding proof from others. > >>>>> > >>>>> Get cracking Roger. Answer the questions: What kind of cruise > >>>>> missile and launch platform? > >>>> > >>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ? > >>>> It's in between the frames. > >>> > >>> What missile and what platform? It is a simple question yet not one > >>> of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer. > >>> > >>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you > >>> have no argument. > >>> > >>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane crashed > >>> into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. > >>> > >>> QED > >> > >> > >> No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman. > > > > > > Then what missile and what platform? > > > >> But be sure to come back and play our game again. > > > > Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger. > > > > > > I have no need or patiece to play games,....you on the other hand seem to > think that insults and slander can make your case for the 9/11 official > fairytale. > But that won't work with me. Sweetcheeks. > It's quite evident that no one with any credibility saw your "jets" unless > they were watching TV. > > As this CNN reporter makes quite clear > > 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > And ask yourself why the feds kept this private video hidden away for years. > Although the answer should be obvious,....It goes against the fairytale, > since there was NO PLANE > > > 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY And your inability to understand what he meant is obvious. It's another sign of your terminal kOOktardery. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 09:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtefef$1fi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521038 |
BDK wrote: > In article <mt6f94$j33$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Czepiel wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Kid, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise >>>>>>> missile? I responded asking what kind of cruise missile and >>>>>>> launch platform? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No answer yet. And you're demanding proof from others. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get cracking Roger. Answer the questions: What kind of cruise >>>>>>> missile and launch platform? >>>>>> >>>>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ? >>>>>> It's in between the frames. >>>>> >>>>> What missile and what platform? It is a simple question yet not >>>>> one of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer. >>>>> >>>>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you >>>>> have no argument. >>>>> >>>>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane >>>>> crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. >>>>> >>>>> QED >>>> >>>> >>>> No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman. >>> >>> >>> Then what missile and what platform? >>> >>>> But be sure to come back and play our game again. >>> >>> Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger. >> >> >> >> >> >> I have no need or patiece to play games,....you on the other hand seem >> to think that insults and slander can make your case for the 9/11 >> official fairytale. >> But that won't work with me. Sweetcheeks. >> It's quite evident that no one with any credibility saw your "jets" >> unless they were watching TV. >> >> As this CNN reporter makes quite clear >> >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> >> >> >> And ask yourself why the feds kept this private video hidden away for >> years. Although the answer should be obvious,....It goes against the >> fairytale, since there was NO PLANE >> >> >> 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY > > And your inability to understand what he meant is obvious. It's another > sign of your terminal kOOktardery. I'm sorry,....is "KOOKtardery" one childish insult, or two ? .....I like to keep score.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 10:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30649945d757697798c2b3@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521630 |
In article <mtefef$1fi$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <mt6f94$j33$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sarah Czepiel wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hey Kid, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise > >>>>>>> missile? I responded asking what kind of cruise missile and > >>>>>>> launch platform? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No answer yet. And you're demanding proof from others. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Get cracking Roger. Answer the questions: What kind of cruise > >>>>>>> missile and launch platform? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ? > >>>>>> It's in between the frames. > >>>>> > >>>>> What missile and what platform? It is a simple question yet not > >>>>> one of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you > >>>>> have no argument. > >>>>> > >>>>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane > >>>>> crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. > >>>>> > >>>>> QED > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman. > >>> > >>> > >>> Then what missile and what platform? > >>> > >>>> But be sure to come back and play our game again. > >>> > >>> Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> I have no need or patiece to play games,....you on the other hand seem > >> to think that insults and slander can make your case for the 9/11 > >> official fairytale. > >> But that won't work with me. Sweetcheeks. > >> It's quite evident that no one with any credibility saw your "jets" > >> unless they were watching TV. > >> > >> As this CNN reporter makes quite clear > >> > >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > >> > >> > >> > >> And ask yourself why the feds kept this private video hidden away for > >> years. Although the answer should be obvious,....It goes against the > >> fairytale, since there was NO PLANE > >> > >> > >> 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon! > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY > > > > And your inability to understand what he meant is obvious. It's another > > sign of your terminal kOOktardery. > > > > > > I'm sorry,....is "KOOKtardery" one childish insult, or two ? > > .....I like to keep score. Well, there's no other term that captures the essence of Troofery and other nonsensical shit beliefs like it does. Actually, calling it nonsensical shit is being too nice, as there seems to be a lot of lying on your part (You being troofers in general, I believe you actually believe the kOOkspew you post). Please, let your anger flow, and your trip to the kOOkside will be complete. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 22:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <TsSdnWA597Qd3mvInZ2dnUU7-dOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520436 |
"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message news:d5mtg3F59lnU1@mid.individual.net... > Am 12.09.2015 08:55, schrieb Government Shill #2: >>> Then we have the question, how the impact hole was possible at all, >>> >since the walls of that building are extremely strong. >> A 200 ton plane hit it traveling at 500 mph! FFS. >> >>> >What I would miss, if a plane has hit a target at surface level, is a >>> >long strip of scratch marks, where this plane was sliding towards its >>> >target. >> Unless it didn't touch the fucking ground! >> > > This is one of the many websites, that discuss the attack on the pentagon: > > http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html > > This picture shows the actually impact zone: > http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/pentmorris.jpg > > What you actually see is destruction literally at ground level. Since the > impact is assumed to be caused by a passenger jet, this jet had to fly > that low. > > Now imagine to fly a jet at ground level past the lawn around the Pentagon > and how that would look like. > > At least it would leave some scratches. > > TH Just don't forget that the reason neither engine made a mark on the Pentagon was the people that were supposed to plant those explosives didn't want to do that much damage to the Pentagon so they didn't plant them. And the best video by far about the bullshit we were told about the Pentagon is: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw And people could see that the smoke at the Pentagon was really coming from dumpsters. See: 9/11 Pentagon Special Effects - Jim Fetzer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKKZY2zpYiU As stated in: http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html "9/11 was a big lie, and the media showed us a poorly made film. " Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:42 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( plus other media fcuk ups ) |
| Message-ID | <dvGdnWZvUuzPzWvInZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520436 |
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:g3icvatnas9d2fh7aitqajbva62rfbejp2@4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:33:15 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > >>Am 12.09.2015 08:55, schrieb Government Shill #2: >>>> Then we have the question, how the impact hole was possible at all, >>>> >since the walls of that building are extremely strong. >>> A 200 ton plane hit it traveling at 500 mph! FFS. >>> >>>> >What I would miss, if a plane has hit a target at surface level, is a >>>> >long strip of scratch marks, where this plane was sliding towards its >>>> >target. >>> Unless it didn't touch the fucking ground! >>> >> >>This is one of the many websites, that discuss the attack on the pentagon: >> >>http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html >> >>This picture shows the actually impact zone: >>http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/pentmorris.jpg >> >>What you actually see is destruction literally at ground level. Since >>the impact is assumed to be caused by a passenger jet, this jet had to >>fly that low. >> >>Now imagine to fly a jet at ground level past the lawn around the >>Pentagon and how that would look like. >> >>At least it would leave some scratches. > > Are you unable to conceive of a path that ends at the ground floor of a > building, but at, say 300 metres out, is 50~100 feet above the ground? A > sloping > path in other words. A sloping path that is above the bloody grass? No > one, > apart from kOOks, says that the aircraft spent any time on the ground. It > clipped a generator or some such piece of GSE, but that was about 6 foot > tall. > It being clipped and the ground being missed are not mutually exclusive. > > Here. See how only the top of the generator has been hit? > http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/diesel_generator2.jpg > > Shill #2 But the engines didn't leave a mark on the Pentagon because the people that were supposed to plant the explosives needed for the Pentagon filming failed to plant them. And talking about other media fcukups dig this one: 9/11 and Media Fakery http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html Or this one: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+the+ball Or this one: 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg Or this one: 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw Or this one: Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U "9/11 was a big lie, and the media showed us a poorly made film." Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 09:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Gov Shit can't even keep his stories straight ) |
| Message-ID | <V7udnTVv1NVsfWvInZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520436 |
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:gtjcva1ii39jnsvmn53ivotpcskc2l1mc5@4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:33:15 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > >>Now imagine to fly a jet at ground level past the lawn around the >>Pentagon and how that would look like. >> >>At least it would leave some scratches. > > Here. Look at page 4. There is no level flight in the end stages of Flight > 77. > http://www.ntsb.gov/about/Documents/Flight_Path_Study_AA77.pdf Look at page 5 figure 3 you idiot. That figure shows a 360 degree spiral dive but other documentation shows the alleged Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon and made a 270 degree spiral dive instead. http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/aerobatics.html Good, gaud you 9/11 hoaxsters can't even keep your stories straight. ROTFLMAO. Oh and also notice in the above link the G force in that turn would have ripped the wings off of a 757 but it would not rip the wings off of a missile. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web