Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520084 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-10 19:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 283 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:31 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 14:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:26 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:49 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:18 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
planes thereupon none where noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 18:10 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:32 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:33 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:15 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:40 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
no asbestos cladding on the main beams noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0700
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
if the planes were not bombs, or if they were bombs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 11:21 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 17:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:01 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:14 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-22 03:28 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:20 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:36 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-12 08:02 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-13 04:18 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:04 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 16:01 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:08 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 02:12 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:33 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 13:45 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 11:32 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 12:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 15:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 14:10 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 14:19 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 14:04 -0700
no bombs that were not planes e.g noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:24 -0700
Page 14 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 Next page →
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 16:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dm2hva9ti46i3q5rv1rsj69ndd91e3eu9m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521148 |
Domvile: From Admiral to Cabin Boy Ian Buckley remembers a neglected prophet Complacent, self-seeking, corrupt and foolish: these are just a few of the adjectives that can be applied to the present-day British Establishment. However, these words very definitely did not apply to Admiral Sir Barry Domvile, who rose to the highest levels of policy-making during an era of crucial interest. This was the period when this country was losing self-confidence and independent direction, as Great Britain began to gradually transform into a drab little Britain. The stage was set for the coming of miserable political hucksters like Blair and Thatcher, themselves at the beck and call of greater powers. The puppets dance, whilst hidden forces pull the strings from behind the scenes, as Domvile put it in his excellent and revealing memoir From Admiral to Cabin Boy. Incidentally, Barry Domvile, whose long life ended on 13th August 1971, was prescient enough to foretell the coming of globalisation and the globalisers with his perfect short description: "...no territorial limits and respects no human ideals, but regards the whole world as one glorious financial playground to be used for its own benefit." Early awakenings Just before the First World War, Domvile had begun to gain knowledge of the ways of government, due to his position as assistant secretary on the Imperial Defence Committee. The overall impression he drew from the experience was alarming: 'From that time onwards I had a strong suspicion that there was some mysterious power at work behind the scenes controlling the actions of the figures visibly taking part in the Government of the country. I had not the least idea whence this power emanated, nor could I gauge the strength of its influence. I was in far too humble a position to make such lofty discoveries. Still the feeling persisted. We always vaguely referred to this hidden control amongst ourselves as the Treasury.' This theorizing was much strengthened by the undoubted fact that successive British governments of the time made idiotic and even near-suicidal decisions, which made no sense whatever in rational terms. A good example - which astonished Barry Domvile - was the abandonment of the alliance with Japan in 1921. There were close links between the Royal Navy and the Japanese Navy, which to some extent had been modelled after the pattern of the former, but largely as a result of American pressure, the British government decided not to renew the Treaty. At once, the Far Eastern possessions of the Empire such as Hong Kong and Singapore were imperilled. In addition, this move was also a calculated insult to the Japanese, a very foolish thing to do to a nation so acutely sensitive to 'loss of face'. It would seem the right place to give Domvile's verdict about those early suspicions regarding the ultimate cause of the misdirection of Britain: 'This mysterious power, to which I have been referring, will be constantly appearing in the course of this narrative. A short distinctive title will be a convenience. Let us christen it Judmas, because, as I discovered at a much later date, its source is the Judaeo-Masonic combination, which has wielded such a baneful influence in world history for many centuries.' Now it should be noted that this statement is in no sense the product of 'hate', but rather of common-sense and observation. Domvile had attended numerous peace conferences after World War I, knew both Lloyd George and Churchill, and was as well-informed as you'd expect a Director of Naval Intelligence to be. Remember that, as far back as the middle of the nineteenth century, the Rothschild dynasty exerted enormous financial control over all European countries and even the United States. Benjamin Disraeli admitted as much in Coningsby. Has that power lessened since then? It does not seem likely or probable that it has. Worked for Anglo-German friendship By the beginning of the 1930s, Barry Domvile had become President of the Royal Naval College at Greenwich. He saw the acute need of fostering better relations between Britain and Germany and so avoiding another disaster like the Great War. Eventually he founded the Anglo-German Link, an association whose intended purpose was: 'To foster the mutual knowledge and understanding between the British and German peoples, and to counteract the flood of lies with which our people were being regaled in their daily papers.' Unlike a roughly similar organisation, the Anglo-German Fellowship, which catered mainly for business types and the upper classes, Domvile's Link was aimed more towards ordinary people: 'Membership of the 'Link' was open to all; to anyone with enough sense to realise that the establishment of good relations between English and German peoples was the best work to which any man and woman could apply if they wished to avoid a cataclysm. 'We opened branches gradually all over the country, several in London and its suburbs. I spent a time travelling all over England and Scotland, to address members of new Branches; I never got as far as Ireland, or to any of the Branches started by enthusiasts in the Dominions.' Despite the fact that Domvile - when visiting Germany with Link members - had always been careful to keep clear of excessive contact with 'official Nazidom', his leadership of the Link was to be held against him. It was the main factor which led to his imprisonment without trial under regulation 18b in Brixton Prison. Then as now the advocates of 'freedom' were extremely touchy about any dissenting views. For whatever bizarre putative reason may have occurred to the Churchill government, his wife Alexandrina was also imprisoned, in Holloway. The Admiral had come to his 'cabin' in Brixton Jail. One warder, who had been a petty officer under Domvile, was unable to believe his eyes when he found his distinguished former commander in a cell. Interestingly, by the standards of the time Barry Domvile was completely free from racial animosity, referring to kindness of a black prisoner who carried his case, or commenting that he preferred the presence of thirty 'clean and inoffensive' Chinese internees to that of thirty politicians of the type of Herbert Morrison. For the next three years, Admiral Domvile's home was to be a cell, with a plank bed two inches from the floor, a table, chair and wash-stand. But Domvile did not become too bitter, holding that as long as you were content with our own company, that prison afforded many opportunities to develop your mind that were otherwise unobtainable in the modern world. Accurate views Still, it was a most unfair punishment to be imposed just for holding embarrassingly accurate views: 'It has been admitted by Mr. Cordell Hull that the United States Government presented impossible terms to Japan, and only expected a declaration of war in response. I do not pretend to know whether Churchill realised the speedy loss of our Far Eastern possessions which was bound to follow, if his efforts to bring America into the war were successful. I can only reiterate that I did.' Or consider this statement by Admiral Barry Domvile, which is very relevant today, and should be specially directed towards our conscienceless and shameless 'leaders' to poverty, war and calamity: 'The first duty of any form of Government is to promote the welfare of its own subjects, and not to sacrifice their lives uselessly, in an endeavour to exercise parental control over a reluctant world, mainly at the behest of a powerful alien minority.' In conclusion, Admiral Domvile's book From Admiral to Cabin Boy is an essential read, if - and this is a big if - you can find a copy. Though obtainable from ordinary bookshops and libraries for some years following its publication in 1947, the book has almost disappeared from public view. Even in the 1950s, Ezra Pound complained that From Admiral to Cabin Boy was being suppressed and quietly removed from libraries. So much for 'democracy'! At the risk of repeating myself, what sort of democracy do we have in this country, when that word means little more a sanctification of misrule by media mafia, fattest wallet and most pliable bought politician? As Domvile himself commented: 'I have no regrets whatever for undertaking the voyage, as I should always have reproached myself if I had failed to do my utmost to draw attention to the contemplated betrayal of all true British interests. It is a matter for deep regret, however, that my misgivings have been only too completely justified by the passage of events.' Spearhead Online www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <75nhvalmnlir9h018elhno2t5l0fkmn2l6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521355 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:17:22 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[Snip to focus on this one point]
>Complacent, self-seeking, corrupt and foolish: these are just a few of
>the adjectives that can be applied to the present-day British
>Establishment.
How do the British connect to the attacks of 9/11/01?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 16:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iuojvale1m1a04ssjmq7v81n42l87jldrc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521418 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:06:30 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:17:22 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> >wrote: > > >[Snip to focus on this one point] > >>Complacent, self-seeking, corrupt and foolish: these are just a few of >>the adjectives that can be applied to the present-day British >>Establishment. > > How do the British connect to the attacks of 9/11/01? This is the post I replied to: >> "We National Socialists have grown accustomed since our takeover in >'We are the Lolipop Guild, >the Lolipop Guild, >the Lolipop Guild. >We are the Lolipop Guild, >and we'd like to welcome you >to Munchkin Land.' Of course I snipped the post entirely because not snipping it is a sign of respect and I show none at all. My post about the British was from Spearhead magazine. This is very wise to our Jewish rulers. 9/11 was a false flag and all about invading countries the Jews don't like. www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 16:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-F5A793.16010216092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #521533 |
In article <iuojvale1m1a04ssjmq7v81n42l87jldrc@4ax.com>, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote: > Of course I snipped the post entirely because not snipping it is a > sign of respect and I show none at all. Thank you, thank you, thank you. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' When is a Kenyan not a Kenyan? When he's a Canadian. That's People's Commissioner Siri Cruz now. Punch!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3063dc93a20309f898aeb6@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #521552 |
In article <chine.bleu-F5A793.16010216092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, chine.bleu@yahoo.com says... > > In article <iuojvale1m1a04ssjmq7v81n42l87jldrc@4ax.com>, > Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Of course I snipped the post entirely because not snipping it is a > > sign of respect and I show none at all. > > Thank you, thank you, thank you. How do you feel about dry-humping? -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob0lva9aer33ff0fjqd7nqh8vdvmlhrf71@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521533 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:54:13 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:06:30 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:17:22 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>[Snip to focus on this one point]
>>
>>>Complacent, self-seeking, corrupt and foolish: these are just a few of
>>>the adjectives that can be applied to the present-day British
>>>Establishment.
>>
>> How do the British connect to the attacks of 9/11/01?
>
>This is the post I replied to:
>
Anyone with an interest can check Message-ID:
<dm2hva9ti46i3q5rv1rsj69ndd91e3eu9m@4ax.com> and see that you've been
reduced to lying.
>>> "We National Socialists have grown accustomed since our takeover in
>
>>'We are the Lolipop Guild,
>>the Lolipop Guild,
>>the Lolipop Guild.
>>We are the Lolipop Guild,
>>and we'd like to welcome you
>>to Munchkin Land.'
>
>Of course I snipped the post entirely because not snipping it is a
>sign of respect and I show none at all.
You lack the intellect to do so.
>
>My post about the British was from Spearhead magazine. This is very
>wise to our Jewish rulers. 9/11 was a false flag and all about
>invading countries the Jews don't like.
>
You have yet to answer the question I asked. Will you do so now,
or continue to prove you lack the intellect to do so? Time will tell.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 02:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-66ED68.02124117092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #521618 |
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:54:13 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> > wrote: > You lack the intellect to do so. Has Spaz ever demonstrated an original thought? -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' When is a Kenyan not a Kenyan? When he's a Canadian. That's People's Commissioner Siri Cruz now. Punch!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 13:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0amdnaYKPNg0mmbInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521622 |
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:chine.bleu-66ED68.02124117092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:54:13 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> >> wrote: > >> You lack the intellect to do so. > > Has Spaz ever demonstrated an original thought? ROTFLMAO because that is pretty funny coming from someone who swears by roadrunner cartoons. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 13:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-560A8D.13454917092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #521666 |
In article <0amdnaYKPNg0mmbInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > "Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:chine.bleu-66ED68.02124117092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... > >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:54:13 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> > >> wrote: > > > >> You lack the intellect to do so. > > > > Has Spaz ever demonstrated an original thought? > > ROTFLMAO because that is pretty funny coming from someone who swears by > roadrunner cartoons. Meep! Meep! -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' When is a Kenyan not a Kenyan? When he's a Canadian. That's People's Commissioner Siri Cruz now. Punch!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4csmvadb2o8jv1mgpbniu75sn1ojunl5r5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521622 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:12:41 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:54:13 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
>> You lack the intellect to do so.
>
>Has Spaz ever demonstrated an original thought?
Statistically he will have. But I've yet to see an example.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 16:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2tcmvalp33tfdlmhi8c065dvdfcp7uonbm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521618 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:02:11 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>This is the post I replied to: >> > > Anyone with an interest can check Message-ID: ><dm2hva9ti46i3q5rv1rsj69ndd91e3eu9m@4ax.com> and see that you've been >reduced to lying. Well, you are full of shit. Let's see what else comes out of your worthless pie hole. > You lack the intellect to do so. When I answered your post I didn't realize what a piece of shit you are, although I was suspicous. > > You have yet to answer the question I asked. Will you do so now, >or continue to prove you lack the intellect to do so? Time will tell. I will not do so now since you are a clearly a piece of shit. www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jcsmvadklkn2m8dup1g4tqnddcnolh998p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521727 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:45:36 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:02:11 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>This is the post I replied to:
>>
>> Anyone with an interest can check Message-ID:
>><dm2hva9ti46i3q5rv1rsj69ndd91e3eu9m@4ax.com> and see that you've been
>>reduced to lying.
>
>Well, you are full of shit.
That's the MID for YOUR post, stupid.
>Let's see what else comes out of your
>worthless pie hole.
>
>>>> "We National Socialists have grown accustomed since our takeover in
>>>
>>>>'We are the Lolipop Guild,
>>>>the Lolipop Guild,
>>>>the Lolipop Guild.
>>>>We are the Lolipop Guild,
>>>>and we'd like to welcome you
>>>>to Munchkin Land.'
>>>
>>>Of course I snipped the post entirely because not snipping it is a
>>>sign of respect and I show none at all.
>>
>> You lack the intellect to do so.
>>
>>>My post about the British was from Spearhead magazine. This is very
>>>wise to our Jewish rulers. 9/11 was a false flag and all about
>>>invading countries the Jews don't like.
>>
>> You have yet to answer the question I asked. Will you do so now,
>>or continue to prove you lack the intellect to do so? Time will tell.
>
>When I answered your post I didn't realize what a piece of shit you
>are, although I was suspicous.
>
You offered no answer to the question I asked.
>> You have yet to answer the question I asked. Will you do so now,
>>or continue to prove you lack the intellect to do so? Time will tell.
>
> I will not do so now since you are a clearly a piece of shit.
>
Your additional PROOF that you lack the intellect to answer is
noted and accepted.
I will, of course, point out how you've proved you are
intellectually inferior when it's needed.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g05pvad91qtsfigo05qvdp0oafivt4b7gf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521754 |
CIA insider tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view, America! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7Bws The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse of steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes, is the SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's few small fires and superficial debris damage could not account for this collapse, which had all the earmarks of controlled demolition by explosives. Videos clearly show this. Such demolitions take many days or weeks to set up - not the few hours between the plane "attacks" and the collapse. The explosives therefore had to be put in place BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of previously placed explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like the badly damaged and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have remained standing. Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological denial still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it obviously was, and they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and fabrications, elaborate lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to defend their indefensible position. The REAL terrorists are desperate to cover up their mass-murderous crime of the century - the permitting if not perpetration of, and subsequent political and economic exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster. Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's most sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible morning? I don't think so! There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable than the explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing down of NORAD. Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on the roofs of nearby buildings. These were too far away to be from jumpers from the towers. If the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire alone, what blew these bodies to smithereens and sent the fragments flying for considerable distances? The plane impacts did not have the explosive brisance (shattering force) necessary to do this - only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny bits and throw them such distances. So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than their being the result of high explosives being detonated in the towers? The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the World Trade Center building collapses: SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World Trade Center (WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent people. Videos of the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for days. About 5 hours after the towers fell, WTC building 7 also collapsed suddenly, completely, and straight down at near free-fall speed. This steel-framed building was not touched by the planes that struck the towers, and had sustained relatively minor debris damage and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily damaged remained standing. In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan Reynolds, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated, "The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale." We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's tale that's "beyond the pale!" Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics, and the emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have stymied objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of authoritarian assertions? The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told us that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now referred to as a "pancake collapse". According to the government claims, the plane crashes and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet fuel is NOT exotic) fires heated the UL-certified structural steel to the point where it was significantly weakened, which is very difficult to believe, never mind repeat in an experiment. Even with massive fires that incinerate everything else, the steel frames of such buildings generally remain standing. According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical evidence was quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly caused part of the tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the tower, which, we've been repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain reaction of the lower floors sequentially, one at a time, yielding to the weight falling from above. There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the observed facts * It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical steel core columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the next. * The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to gravity alone. This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from the air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the tower. Those undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered resistance thousands of times greater than that of air. Those lower stories, and the central steel core columns, had successfully supported the mass of the tower for 30 years despite hurricane-force winds and tremors. Air cannot do that. Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the way of the upper floors as gracefully and relatively without friction as air would? Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing the fall of the upper floors less than would, say, a parachute? What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers could not have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower stories, as rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is shown to be physically impossible! So WHERE DID ALL THAT ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY COME FROM? Conclusions In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the observed duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more of the following zany-sounding conditions must have been met * The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero resistance to the collapse. * The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any expenditure of energy. * The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by magic. None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible, conditions can be accounted for by the official government theory of 9/11, nor by any of the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to prop up this official myth of 9/11. The Bottom Line It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that the WTC collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the plane impacts. The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that the towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but rather they came down because something else was causing them to disintegrate. So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse" story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates' other premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is left to you to decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly incorrect presumptions, is also flawed. The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, also collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192 No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel columns Understanding the full truth of 9/11 seems to require two separate awakenings. The first, awakening to the fraudulence of the "official 9/11 story," is a pretty simple brain function and only requires a little study, logic or curiosity. We can help a lot with that part here and it's a major purpose of this site. The second step, however, consciously confronting the implications of that knowledge--and what it says about our media, politics and economic system today--is by far the harder awakening and requires an enormous exercise of nerve and heart. (As the Chinese say, "You cannot wake up a man who is pretending to sleep.") In other words, this part of the journey depends more on character than on maps and evidence so we can't help you much here, except to point out inspiring heroes and heroines who have courageously faced that truth, spoken out, and survived... www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 06:25 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <09f9ffa3847f5c4c625cdd1ec82efe62@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #521906 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Topaz, in <news:g05pvad91qtsfigo05qvdp0oafivt4b7gf@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > CIA insider te<SMACKAKOOK!> Liar. That you continue your lies so you can feed your unwarranted hatred of Jews is noted. That you're too stupid and too fucking weak-willed to face reality is noted. Kook. LOL Moron. LOL Laughingstock. LOL BTW, your "CIA insider" Susan Lindauer is a delusional schizophrenic nutjob who believes she has psychic abilities and can utter prophecies. She had no connections whatsoever to the CIA... and her only actual connection to anyone who *did* have connections with the CIA was a physician with ties to the middle east. She was a conspiracy theory nutjob even back then, continually pursuing meetings with him to pump him for information. He broke off contact with Lindauer due to what he described as an increasingly "seditious bent" to her discussions. IOW, she went off the rails. She was arrested by the FBI for taking money from the Iraqi Intelligence Service, and indicted for acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government... IOW, a spy. She was later arrested at Carswell AFB for psychological evaluation, only released after she was deemed mentally unfit to stand trial. She then began k'laming she was a CIA asset... but in reality, she had just known someone years prior (who had cut off all contact with her) who was a CIA asset. She was later yet again found mentally unfit to stand trial and judged to be mentally insane. Psychotic. She was never a CIA agent, she was never a CIA asset. Believe the stupidity that tard spews at your own risk... you'd do well to research her claims completely, given that she's been caught in many, _many_ lies. Par for the course for a psychotic delusional kook... they all lie to sustain their delusions. <https://www.metabunk.org/susan-lindauer.t2494/> <https://web.archive.org/web/20130620221315/http://www.scribd.com/doc/46046645/US-v-Susan-Lindauer-NYSD-448-F-Supp-2d-558-2006> <https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/46046645-us-v-susan-lindauer-nysd-448-f-supp-2d-558-2006-pdf.1445/> "Although defendant denies she is mentally ill, she is plainly aware of what others think, and so, as Dr. Kleinman noted, she "is disposed to dissimulate, i.e., minimize the presence and extent of her psychiatric difficulties, especially to mental health professionals — whom she distrusts and generally dislikes." (Kleinman Report 12/13/05 at 8) She acknowledged to him that if she testifies at her trial she will have to avoid touching on such subjects as her psychic powers, but "also noted that when (metaphorically) attacked by others she has spontaneously uttered prophecies." (Id.at 46) But then, given that you're just as insane as Susan Lindauer, there's little surprise that you'd not only believe her wholly implausible kookbabble, but that you'd accept it wholesale as your own delusion. <snicker> -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a "nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to silence them. K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID: <YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic] nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 04:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g9aqvalqrgcoj3so11f9fmvq29q4629m5p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521940 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:25:40 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
You worthless little turds are all the same. Imagining you proved
something in the past when no one even reads your posts. The only
thing you prove in the present is that you should do the world a favor
and flush yourself down a toilet.
"The dancing Jews were there, in New York on 11 September 2001. They
were there to see the 9/11 attacks; to watch the twin towers being
destroyed - all three of them. NB the government enquiry glossed over
the collapse of WTC7, the third skyscraper that was dropped.
Conspiracy? Believe it.
They were there to record it for posterity or was it for Mossad? How
did they know it was going to happen? They are not saying. Why did the
American government let them go? Treason is one distinct possibility.
Jews controlling the American government are a matter of fact not
fancy. The Israel Lobby is powerful. The Israel Lobby bribes, bullies,
controls and American interests be damned.
9-11 Attacks - Five Dancing Jews Arrested -
http://www.todayscatholicworld.com/mossad-agents-911.htm
According to ABCNEWS sources, Israeli and U.S. government officials
worked out a deal - and after 71 days, the five Israelis were taken
out of jail, put on a plane, and deported back home. While the former
detainees refused to answer ABCNEWS' questions about their detention
and what they were doing on Sept. 11, several of the detainees
discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after
their return home. Said one of the men, "Our purpose was to document
the event."
ABC News Asks If The Five Jews Were Spies -
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1#.TuW7ynpD6So
Millions saw the horrific images of the World Trade Center attacks,
and those who saw them won't forget them. But a New Jersey homemaker
saw something that morning that prompted an investigation into five
young Israelis and their possible connection to Israeli intelligence.
9-11 Attacks - The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested on 9-11 -
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html
Another source. Worth a look?
Dancing Israelis Debunked -
http://www.911myths.com/html/dancing_israelis.html
Separately, officials said a group of about five men were now under
investigation in Union City, suspected of assisting the hijackers. In
addition, the officials said the men had apparently set up cameras
near the Hudson River and fixed them on the World Trade Center. They
photographed the attacks and were said to have congratulated each
other afterward, officials said.
This is a competent analysis of the evidence; one pushing the idea
that the Jews were not part of an enemy conspiracy. There is no
mention of their involvement with URBAN MOVING SYSTEMS, a firm run by
Jews that fled the country very rapidly when they were exposed as part
of the action.
sunray22b
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 11:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mtc5iq$8fi$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #521355 |
On 9/15/2015 4:17 PM, Topaz wrote: hey Topass, how your Nazi's doin ? come on over to the south side, and help out our "Black Lives Matter" rally and gun shoot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 12:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtc617$9pk$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #521466 |
On 9/16/2015 12:32 PM, gilber34 wrote: > On 9/15/2015 4:17 PM, Topaz wrote: > > hey Topass, how your Nazi's doin ? > > come on over to the south side, and help out our "Black Lives Matter" > rally and gun shoot. > Black lives DO matter...white people need something to shoot at..little feller.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 15:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtcfsa$30j$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #521467 |
On 9/16/2015 1:53 PM, THE COLONEL, Ph.D wrote: > "Stagger Lee" wrote in message news:mtc617$9pk$1@speranza.aioe.org... > On 9/16/2015 12:32 PM, gilber34 wrote: >> On 9/15/2015 4:17 PM, Topaz wrote: >> >> hey Topass, how your Nazi's doin ? >> >> come on over to the south side, and help out our "Black Lives Matter" >> rally and gun shoot. >> > > Black lives DO matter...white people need something to shoot at..little > feller. > > > How about Black Lies? Do they matter, too? > > Like black is beautiful?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 14:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-1EF2E7.14105516092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #521487 |
In article <mtcfsa$30j$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> wrote: > On 9/16/2015 1:53 PM, THE COLONEL, Ph.D wrote: > > "Stagger Lee" wrote in message news:mtc617$9pk$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > On 9/16/2015 12:32 PM, gilber34 wrote: > >> On 9/15/2015 4:17 PM, Topaz wrote: > >> > >> hey Topass, how your Nazi's doin ? > >> > >> come on over to the south side, and help out our "Black Lives Matter" > >> rally and gun shoot. > >> > > > > Black lives DO matter...white people need something to shoot at..little > > feller. > > > > > > How about Black Lies? Do they matter, too? > > > > > > > Like black is beautiful? http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/19/article-0-161E8C6E000005DC-645_634x835. jpg -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' When is a Kenyan not a Kenyan? When he's a Canadian. That's People's Commissioner Siri Cruz now. Punch!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 16:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <e8pjvadfkq4prlobfsq47oq3at1rjnekhk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521466 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:32:19 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 9/15/2015 4:17 PM, Topaz wrote: > >hey Topass, how your Nazi's doin ? > >come on over to the south side, and help out our "Black Lives Matter" >rally and gun shoot. National Socialists are the real peaceful protesters. America is ruled by Jews who hate the White race. www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web