Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #520362 > unrolled thread

14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links?

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-09-11 14:24 -0500
Last post2015-09-12 13:58 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 81 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 14:24 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:04 -0400
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:16 +0000
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:23 -0400
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:42 +0000
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-11 23:04 -0400
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 06:51 -0400
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 10:13 -0400
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-11 22:35 +0200
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:48 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:07 -0500
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 18:40 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:57 -0500
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:41 -0500
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 19:18 -0400
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 18:30 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 21:26 -0400
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:07 -0500
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:14 +0000
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:11 -0500
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:36 -0400
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:44 -0500
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:29 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:51 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:09 -0400
                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:23 -0500
                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:37 -0400
                        Re: Rocky's imaginary missle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:54 +0000
                          Re: Rocky's imaginary missle Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:06 -0400
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 21:27 -0400
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:41 -0400
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 01:40 -0400
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:34 -0400
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:03 -0500
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:24 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:30 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:59 -0400
                    Re: Rocky's imaginary missile jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:59 +0000
                    Re: Rocky's imaginary missile moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 15:00 +0000
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:44 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 18:19 -0400
                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 17:31 -0500
                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 18:56 -0400
                          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:35 -0500
                            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:59 -0400
                              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 19:19 -0500
                                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 20:51 -0400
                                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 22:32 -0500
                                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:07 -0400
                                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:16 -0500
                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
                                          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:44 -0500
                                            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:08 -0400
                                              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:10 -0500
                                                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:30 -0400
                                                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:46 -0500
                                                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:53 -0400
                                                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 11:12 -0500
                                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 12:32 -0400
                                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:37 -0500
                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:36 -0500
                                Re: Rocky stumped jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:46 +0000
                            Re: Rocky's legal woes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:52 +0000
                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 23:58 +0100
                        Re: Rocky's newst delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:50 +0000
                    Re: Backed into a corner, Rocky lashes out jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Rocky's imaginary missle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:56 +0000
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-14 08:42 -0400
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:32 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 09:29 -0400
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 15:32 -0400
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-14 10:44 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 09:33 -0400
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-17 10:33 -0400
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 22:47 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( plus other media fcuk ups ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 23:42 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links?  ( Gov Shit can't even keep his stories straight ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:59 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-12 13:58 -0400

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →


#520569

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-12 20:11 -0500
Message-ID<p8j9vadbmsl1o6li4qfbgq0c0qk8qjt83l@4ax.com>
In reply to#520550
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:30:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:q3o6va91iu7jc27sdljjlh6mb66hcodq6u@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hey Kid,
>>>>
>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
>>>> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>>>>
>>>> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>>>>
>>>> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile 
>>>> and launch platform?
>>>
>>>The type of missile used is in the video below and oddly enough the 
>>>missile that was used is in the graphic associated with the following video too.
>>
>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was used?
>
>You are making me repeat myself but this time I'll add the minute and second 
>to start the video at:
>
>Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>( indexed to start at 25:25 )
> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s
>
>A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the
>type of missile used didn't have a problem.
>

     Please answer the questions Sarah asked. Unless an honest answer
really is impossible for you.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520598

FromSarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-12 22:36 -0400
Message-ID<n5o9va14825vn9b8cgoj4jhjmvi275p3qm@4ax.com>
In reply to#520550
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>>
>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was used?
>
>You are making me repeat myself

No I'm not.  No video's needed.     

YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
that your argument for a missile falls apart.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520602

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-12 21:44 -0500
Message-ID<05qdnXdXSrGrfmnInZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520598
"Sarah Czepiel" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:n5o9va14825vn9b8cgoj4jhjmvi275p3qm@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was 
>>> used?
>>
>>You are making me repeat myself
>
> No I'm not.  No video's needed.
>
> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
> that your argument for a missile falls apart.

Funny that you would change your name without saying why but a quick search 
shows your old handle was both a lesbian and a stalker. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520611

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-12 23:29 -0400
Message-ID<2ar9va5gjebsuh71burqc3kvd471g9o9mn@4ax.com>
In reply to#520602
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:44:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Czepiel" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:n5o9va14825vn9b8cgoj4jhjmvi275p3qm@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was 
>>>> used?
>>>
>>>You are making me repeat myself
>>
>> No I'm not.  No video's needed.
>>
>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>
>Funny that you would change your name without saying why 

>a quick search shows your old handle was both a lesbian and a stalker. 

Not me.  The lesbian/stalker is someone else.  You'll notice she
stopped using my name after I notified her IP.  

Back on point.   

YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
 that your argument for a missile falls apart.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520639 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 05:51 -0500
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )
Message-ID<N66dnanm4YLcyGjInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520611
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:2ar9va5gjebsuh71burqc3kvd471g9o9mn@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:44:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sarah Czepiel" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:n5o9va14825vn9b8cgoj4jhjmvi275p3qm@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was
>>>>> used?
>>>>
>>>>You are making me repeat myself
>>>
>>> No I'm not.  No video's needed.
>>>
>>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>>
>>Funny that you would change your name without saying why
>
>>a quick search shows your old handle was both a lesbian and a stalker.
>
> Not me.  The lesbian/stalker is someone else.  You'll notice she
> stopped using my name after I notified her IP.


From what I see, there is no doubt that you are a stalker and there is no 
doubt that  you are a heckler so she might have even been right about the 
lesbian stuff too especially if you start showing an affinity toward Bast.


> Back on point.
>
> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
> that your argument for a missile falls apart.

You are too funny.  There are plenty of sites and youtube videos dealing 
with the fact no commercial jet hit the Pentagon.

On 9/11/01 it was more than obvious we were given a load of crap about what 
hit the Pentagon and what crashed at Pranksville, PA.  Other people quickly 
caught on to the fact both crashes in Nuke York City were bogus but it took 
9 more years for me to see that for what it was.

Now, back to the Pentagon.  All I could think was if the air traffic 
controllers thought there was a blip on their radar someone must have faked 
the blip.  And then I'd find out one of the games the military was playing 
on 9/11/01 was with bogus blips on the radar.

There is even a video out where an air traffic controller is begging to have 
the bogus blips turned off and he says something like hey turn the sim 
switches off, I can't deal with that crap."  See the following to start 
right before 25 seconds where the quote comes from.

"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Trailer
 https://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0?t=24s

The truth is the media never had a valid argument to say a commercial jet 
crashed at the Pentagon so it is you who never had a valid argument where 
the Pentagon is concerned.  <G>

And if you want to know more about the missile that hit the Pentagon you 
will have to watch the video where I got the info from yourself.  And I was 
even nice enough to bookmark where the info was at.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520675 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )
Message-ID<a4tavaps1io2uulfapj4126r9lefgm31ei@4ax.com>
In reply to#520639
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:51:00 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

[...]

>>>>>You are making me repeat myself
>>>>
>>>> No I'm not.  No video's needed.
>>>>
>>>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>>>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>>>
>>>Funny that you would change your name without saying why
>>
>>>a quick search shows your old handle was both a lesbian and a stalker.
>>
>> Not me.  The lesbian/stalker is someone else.  You'll notice she
>> stopped using my name after I notified her IP.
>
>
>From what I see, there is no doubt that you are a stalker and there is no 
>doubt that  you are a heckler so she might have even been right about the 
>lesbian stuff too especially if you start showing an affinity toward Bast.
>

     Let's just say for the moment Sarah is a lesbian. Aside from
coming as a shock to her husband, what relevance would it have to
anything? How, in reality, would her sexual orientation change the
accuracy of her posts and her question regarding the missile and
platform?

>> Back on point.
>>
>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>
>You are too funny.  There are plenty of sites and youtube videos dealing 
>with the fact no commercial jet hit the Pentagon.
>
>On 9/11/01 it was more than obvious we were given a load of crap about what 
>hit the Pentagon and what crashed at Pranksville, PA.  Other people quickly 
>caught on to the fact both crashes in Nuke York City were bogus but it took 
>9 more years for me to see that for what it was.
>
>Now, back to the Pentagon.  All I could think was if the air traffic 
>controllers thought there was a blip on their radar someone must have faked 
>the blip.  And then I'd find out one of the games the military was playing 
>on 9/11/01 was with bogus blips on the radar.
>
>There is even a video out where an air traffic controller is begging to have 
>the bogus blips turned off and he says something like hey turn the sim 
>switches off, I can't deal with that crap."  See the following to start 
>right before 25 seconds where the quote comes from.
>
>"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Trailer
> https://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0?t=24s
>
>The truth is the media never had a valid argument to say a commercial jet 
>crashed at the Pentagon so it is you who never had a valid argument where 
>the Pentagon is concerned.  <G>
>
>And if you want to know more about the missile that hit the Pentagon you 
>will have to watch the video where I got the info from yourself.  And I was 
>even nice enough to bookmark where the info was at.  <G>

     This doesn't address the point Sarah raised. Will you address it
now, or continue to PROVE you've been lying the whole time?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520780 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 16:09 -0400
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )
Message-ID<fclbvalmdb7hrusojvl0cvalb4r9rggtk7@4ax.com>
In reply to#520639
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:51:00 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:2ar9va5gjebsuh71burqc3kvd471g9o9mn@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:44:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Sarah Czepiel" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:n5o9va14825vn9b8cgoj4jhjmvi275p3qm@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was
>>>>>> used?
>>>>>
>>>>>You are making me repeat myself
>>>>
>>>> No I'm not.  No video's needed.
>>>>
>>>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>>>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>>>
>>>Funny that you would change your name without saying why
>>
>>>a quick search shows your old handle was both a lesbian and a stalker.
>>
>> Not me.  The lesbian/stalker is someone else.  You'll notice she
>> stopped using my name after I notified her IP.
>
>
>From what I see, there is no doubt that you are a stalker 

Her IP didn't think so, Roger.   They kicked her ass because I
threated to sue them for her actions.  

Does a victim of a stalker use their stalkers name as their own
posting name and do it in the *home* newsgroup of the supposed
stalker?   No they wouldn't and the nice email I received from her IP
apologized for her blatent harassment and use of my name, which is
against their TOS.     

Poor Roger, you can't seem to make any of the shit you fling,  stick.

>> Back on point.
>>
>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>
>You are too funny.  

What's funny is watching you scramble about avoiding the question.  

>And if you want to know more about the missile that hit the Pentagon you 
>will have to watch the video where I got the info from yourself. 

I'm waiting for you, because you have  claimed to have watched the
video to take 1/2 a minute and answer below: 

What missile, what platform?

It is your point to prove, not mine and if you cannot do this Roger
then the conclusion is there was no missile.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520785 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 15:23 -0500
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )
Message-ID<k_CdnYN0d-nERmjInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520780
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:fclbvalmdb7hrusojvl0cvalb4r9rggtk7@4ax.com...

Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the 
jury trial that I won 12 to 0.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520808 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 17:37 -0400
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( Sarah the stalker with no valid argument )
Message-ID<e2rbvat1hffkvlupgumbk4l2fsv7okc07q@4ax.com>
In reply to#520785
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:23:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:fclbvalmdb7hrusojvl0cvalb4r9rggtk7@4ax.com...
>
>Nothing you say matters

Roger/Rocky because I know one of the women you've stalked?   

Now the truth comes out.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520840 — Re: Rocky's imaginary missle

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-13 22:54 +0000
SubjectRe: Rocky's imaginary missle
Message-ID<lebhcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#520785
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
> news:fclbvalmdb7hrusojvl0cvalb4r9rggtk7@4ax.com...
> 
> Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the 
> jury trial that I won 12 to 0.

Backed into a corner by his delusions, Rocky runs from questions. 
 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520846 — Re: Rocky's imaginary missle

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 19:06 -0400
SubjectRe: Rocky's imaginary missle
Message-ID<tb0cvap1sturflgcgmu1jh1n6hqdc8hnbr@4ax.com>
In reply to#520840
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:54:45 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>> news:fclbvalmdb7hrusojvl0cvalb4r9rggtk7@4ax.com...
>> 
>> Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the 
>> jury trial that I won 12 to 0.
>
>Backed into a corner by his delusions, Rocky runs from questions. 

Yeah.  :)   The little coward has done it before.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520668

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
Message-ID<c0tavalianmo6cretkumrifglqe63kergr@4ax.com>
In reply to#520602
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:44:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Czepiel" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:n5o9va14825vn9b8cgoj4jhjmvi275p3qm@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:07:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was 
>>>> used?
>>>
>>>You are making me repeat myself
>>
>> No I'm not.  No video's needed.
>>
>> YOU tell me what missile and what platform, because if you can't do
>> that your argument for a missile falls apart.
>
>Funny that you would change your name without saying why but a quick search 
>shows your old handle was both a lesbian and a stalker. 
>

     If I were to post with your nym and E-mail address, would that
mean the posts from me came from you? You will need to answer in the
affricative, lest another of your MANY deceptions be exposed.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520436

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-09-11 21:27 -0400
Message-ID<msvuts$p3j$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#520416

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Hey Kid,
>
> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>
> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>
> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile
> and launch platform?




Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ?
It's in between the frames.

You didn't really fall for that silliness about it being a commercial 
passenger jet, did you ?
....Jets that size can't vanish into 16 foot holes.

Here,....this guy was there, he'll tell you.

9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520599

FromSarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-12 22:41 -0400
Message-ID<gbo9vadgvjpt7cojmim7r859vgublov1tq@4ax.com>
In reply to#520436
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Kid,
>>
>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
>> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>>
>> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>>
>> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile
>> and launch platform?
>
>Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ?
>It's in between the frames.

What missile and what platform?   It is a simple question yet not one
of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer.  

If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you
have no argument. 

That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane crashed
into the Pentagon on 9/11/01.

QED 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520622

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-09-13 01:40 -0400
Message-ID<mt3242$d47$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#520599

Sarah Czepiel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Kid,
>>>
>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
>>> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>>>
>>> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>>>
>>> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile
>>> and launch platform?
>>
>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ?
>> It's in between the frames.
>
> What missile and what platform?   It is a simple question yet not one
> of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer.
>
> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you
> have no argument.
>
> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane crashed
> into the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
>
> QED




No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman.
But be sure to come back and play our game again.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520789

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 16:34 -0400
Message-ID<fbnbvah0dld6gcs5kjcnks76bg8qtcjvdb@4ax.com>
In reply to#520622
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:40:03 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:27:00 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Kid,
>>>>
>>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
>>>> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>>>>
>>>> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>>>>
>>>> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile
>>>> and launch platform?
>>>
>>> Didn't you see the video the pentagon released ?
>>> It's in between the frames.
>>
>> What missile and what platform?   It is a simple question yet not one
>> of you conspiracy whacko's can give me an answer.
>>
>> If you dumbo's can't answer what missile and what platform then you
>> have no argument.
>>
>> That leaves us with the truth, that an American Airlines plane crashed
>> into the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
>>
>> QED
>
>
>No,..... that leaves you with a lie, and a strawman.


Then what missile and what platform?   

>But be sure to come back and play our game again.

Your *game* is trying to get into the same padded cell as Roger.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520798

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 16:03 -0500
Message-ID<6uudnYkHWLZYeWjInZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520789
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:fbnbvah0dld6gcs5kjcnks76bg8qtcjvdb@4ax.com...

Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the 
jury trial that I won 12 to 0 without even having an attorney in court to 
represent me.

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520801

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 17:24 -0400
Message-ID<qaqbva579omfho4u8t20u5609hlf4m6cr7@4ax.com>
In reply to#520798
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:03:17 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:fbnbvah0dld6gcs5kjcnks76bg8qtcjvdb@4ax.com...
>
>Nothing you say matters

Missile type and platform?    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520803

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 16:30 -0500
Message-ID<ccadnXV2SPKndmjInZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520801
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:qaqbva579omfho4u8t20u5609hlf4m6cr7@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:03:17 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:fbnbvah0dld6gcs5kjcnks76bg8qtcjvdb@4ax.com...
>>
>>Nothing you say matters
>
> Missile type and platform?

I've already given you a video with a bookmark that answers your question. 
If that isn't good enough for you that is your problem and not mine.

I've also given you a link that proves you used two outright lies about the 
jury trial I won 12 to 0 so all you have done is proven to me that you are a 
stalker, a heckler and a big liar just like the other idiots that don't 
realize the only way they can promote the lies told by the media about 9/11 
is with more lies!

Talking about lies I've caught Kid Wills in 6 or 7 lies if I want to count 
the lie he told Bast.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520821

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 17:59 -0400
Message-ID<j9sbvalrr0ctdhbr9h9la5s39btopn5uiq@4ax.com>
In reply to#520803
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:30:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:qaqbva579omfho4u8t20u5609hlf4m6cr7@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:03:17 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:fbnbvah0dld6gcs5kjcnks76bg8qtcjvdb@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>Nothing you say matters
>>
>> Missile type and platform?
>
>I've already given you a video with a bookmark that answers your question. 

It doesn't answer the question as to missile type and platform.  

These are two very basic questions and should be easy for you to
answer if you're trying to sell the missile conspiracy thery.  

>If that isn't good enough for you that is your problem and not mine.
>
>I've also given you a link that proves you used two outright lies 

What two outright lies?  

>Rocky 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web