Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519762 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 202 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Rocky has no clue about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 19:46 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:19 +0000
Re: Rocky is shooken Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:48 +0000
Re: Rocky is shooken Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 21:32 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 22:39 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 06:06 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 07:17 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 10:53 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 08:08 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken "Chad Fistpumper" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-09 17:50 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:21 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 19:30 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:10 -0700
Re: die ass hat spammer, die jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 03:34 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 02:13 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-09 02:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:22 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:16 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:54 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:43 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:36 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
Re: Plane truth Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:48 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:09 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 16:15 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:31 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 04:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 13:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:37 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:03 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 05:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 01:42 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 05:06 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
Re: Plane truth (More proof, if any were needed, that Roger is mentally ill) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
edtiem subjectum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 14:37 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Roger is not mentally able to answer questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:25 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500
Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 02:17 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 17:07 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 22:05 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 01:45 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 04:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:13 +0000
Re: More Rocky fantasy Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 22:59 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:00 -0500
Re: more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) |
| Message-ID | <msnmmr$c1i$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #519826 |
On 08/09/2015 22:11, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:msndtq$frs$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> writes: >> >>> I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >>> did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >> >> That's because that Russian doesn't seem to have a clue what nuclear >> devices actually do! > > You are both idiots because there is a long part in the following video that > shows people described the ground shaking the way people would feel the > ground shaking if there were a 5.5 under their feet. > > Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I > > And Michael if you really think a nuke detonated deep underground in solid > rock really has a air blast wave or an EMP why don't you prove it since the > US obviously did a lot of nuclear testing before their big show in Nuke York > City. > So are you now saying that there was no emp, because you have said that the nukes were deep in solid rock. > Yep, we both noticed that your radiation argument fizzled because they > shipped the samples elsewhere for testing and we have no idea where the > piece of steel came from that was part of a test. > But you have told us that you have evidence that Geiger counters went of at the TT's site, or have you lost that evidence as well? > And don't forget I'm still waiting to see how :a "global collapse" as NIST > called it could leave so little at the bottom of the Twin Towers and then to > have what was left standing up. <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Oh, and you can't use NIST because they dropped the ball on that part. See: > > NIST's Evasion > http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) |
| Message-ID | <w66dnVB4A4wB_HLInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #519855 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:msnmmr$c1i$3@dont-email.me... > On 08/09/2015 22:11, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:msndtq$frs$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> writes: >>> >>>> I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >>>> did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >>> >>> That's because that Russian doesn't seem to have a clue what nuclear >>> devices actually do! >> >> You are both idiots because there is a long part in the following video >> that >> shows people described the ground shaking the way people would feel the >> ground shaking if there were a 5.5 under their feet. >> >> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I >> >> And Michael if you really think a nuke detonated deep underground in >> solid >> rock really has a air blast wave or an EMP why don't you prove it since >> the >> US obviously did a lot of nuclear testing before their big show in Nuke >> York >> City. >> > > So are you now saying that there was no emp, because you have said that > the nukes were deep in solid rock. If I use the term EMP I get all sorts of assholes saying stuff like it should have burned out every light bulb in the area. That is not how big it was since only an AM recover caught it. And you, if you really wanted to know answers you could get them from the same place I do but you are obviously just a heckler. Now if you really want answers google is a great place to start. And if you want to bitch about evasion NIST is a great example of someone that was paid 10 million dollars to be evasive. See: http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html And after seeing how evasive NIST was you shouldn't be bitching about anybody else. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) |
| Message-ID | <msnp67$lld$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #519856 |
On 08/09/2015 23:29, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:msnmmr$c1i$3@dont-email.me... >> On 08/09/2015 22:11, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:msndtq$frs$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >>>>> did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >>>> >>>> That's because that Russian doesn't seem to have a clue what nuclear >>>> devices actually do! >>> >>> You are both idiots because there is a long part in the following video >>> that >>> shows people described the ground shaking the way people would feel the >>> ground shaking if there were a 5.5 under their feet. >>> >>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I >>> >>> And Michael if you really think a nuke detonated deep underground in >>> solid >>> rock really has a air blast wave or an EMP why don't you prove it since >>> the >>> US obviously did a lot of nuclear testing before their big show in Nuke >>> York >>> City. >>> >> >> So are you now saying that there was no emp, because you have said that >> the nukes were deep in solid rock. > > If I use the term EMP I get all sorts of assholes saying stuff like it > should have burned out every light bulb in the area. That is not how big it > was since only an AM recover caught it. > So you are saying that the 'emp' was only detected by an AM particular receiver (I presume you meant receiver), which receiver would that be? > And you, if you really wanted to know answers you could get them from the > same place I do but you are obviously just a heckler. > > Now if you really want answers google is a great place to start. > > And if you want to bitch about evasion NIST is a great example of someone > that was paid 10 million dollars to be evasive. See: > http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html > > And after seeing how evasive NIST was you shouldn't be bitching about > anybody else. DUH. > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 02:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) |
| Message-ID | <mso4jo$396$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #519856 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >If I use the term EMP I get all sorts of assholes saying stuff like it >should have burned out every light bulb in the area. That is not how big it >was since only an AM recover caught it. So it was just a little EMP. So you admit that there couldn't have been a nuke there after all, if all there was was just a little EMP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 02:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.305995c33e52c1e198c284@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #519887 |
In article <mso4jo$396$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >If I use the term EMP I get all sorts of assholes saying stuff like it > >should have burned out every light bulb in the area. That is not how big it > >was since only an AM recover caught it. > > So it was just a little EMP. So you admit that there couldn't have been a > nuke there after all, if all there was was just a little EMP. Rocky has said some stupid shit before, but this stuff is just over the top. Again, he pretty much proves he's just a troll, snd you're feeding him. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <UIedna5jBtbD0m3InZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #519887 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mso4jo$396$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>If I use the term EMP I get all sorts of assholes saying stuff like it >>should have burned out every light bulb in the area. That is not how big >>it >>was since only an AM recover caught it. > > So it was just a little EMP. So you admit that there couldn't have been a > nuke there after all, if all there was was just a little EMP. And where is your evidence that EMPs can be created with very little atmosphere? <G> Gaud you have been obviously taken your physics lessons from watching cartoons. And if you want a laugh look for "1.5 million tons" (your words) of debris from the Twin Towers in the following photo. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And oddly enough all that steam could be coming from what was left of 3 nukes because you can even see steam coming from WTC7 and if true that means you wouldn't want to breath that stuff. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 17:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <5f66cc-8ka.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #519968 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And where is your evidence that EMPs can be created with very little > atmosphere? <G> The basic physics of how a nuclear device works and the empirical confirmation of nuclear explosions in space, babbling kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 18:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <mspt1q$sjq$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #519968 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mso4jo$396$1@pcls7.std.com... >> >> So it was just a little EMP. So you admit that there couldn't have been a >> nuke there after all, if all there was was just a little EMP. >And where is your evidence that EMPs can be created with very little >atmosphere? <G> K00ktard, EMPs are generated when the high energy prompt gamma radiation released by the fission and fusion of nuclei interacts with surrounding matter (whether atmosphere or stone) via the Compton effect. This expels electrons with an energy of about 1 MeV which travel at nearly the speed of light. The electrons contribute to a Compton current which generates enormous electric and magnetic fields in the E1 pulse. This produces a near instantaneous electric field of 50,000 volts/meter, destroying non-hardened electronics by exceeding the breakdown voltage of electronic components. Since rock is much denser than the atmosphere, the Compton effect takes place much nearer the point of detonation rather than spread out over a large area in the atmosphere. Therefore an underground nuclear explosion has a much smaller EMP range of about 10 km, as opposed to 1000 miles or more for a high altitude atmospheric detonation. Atmospheric tests also produce slower E2 and E3 pulses through interaction with Earth's magnetic field that doesn't apply to underground tests. It is the E1 pulse that is most damaging and hardest to protect against. >And if you want a laugh look for "1.5 million tons" (your words) of debris >from the Twin Towers in the following photo. <G> Yup. 70 feet of debris from the bathtub floor up to street level would be about right for 1.5 million tons. Thanks for the picture of all that debris. >And oddly enough all that steam could be coming from what was left of 3 >nukes because you can even see steam coming from WTC7 and if true that means >you wouldn't want to breath that stuff. And that radioactive steam would contaminate all of Lower Manhattan with lethal radiation. You're right, you wouldn't want to breathe that stuff. If it existed. (Well, the actual steam from water on fires or whatnot did exist and would be nasty and I wouldn't want to breathe it, either, even though it wouldn't be radioactive) So we're back to Magic Nukes that don't release any radiation, don't produce an EMP, don't produce a 5.5 earthquake with the distinctive nuclear signature, don't produce a fireball, don't produce a 12,000' high mushroom cloud, don't produce a 1200' crater (that little glacial pothole? GMAFB!), has Hushaboom(tm) technology, don't spew tritium, produces a blast wave that does "nothing" upon reaching the atmosphere, shall I go on? How did they cram that much magic into a single nuke? (Or was it 34 nukes?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <ivGdnVPxCcWILW3InZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #519993 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mspt1q$sjq$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mso4jo$396$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> >>> So it was just a little EMP. So you admit that there couldn't have been >>> a >>> nuke there after all, if all there was was just a little EMP. > >>And where is your evidence that EMPs can be created with very little >>atmosphere? <G> > > K00ktard, EMPs are generated when the high energy prompt gamma radiation > released by the fission and fusion of nuclei interacts with surrounding > matter (whether atmosphere or stone) via the Compton effect. This expels > electrons with an energy of about 1 MeV which travel at nearly the speed > of light. The electrons contribute to a Compton current which generates > enormous electric and magnetic fields in the E1 pulse. This produces a > near instantaneous electric field of 50,000 volts/meter, destroying > non-hardened electronics by exceeding the breakdown voltage of electronic > components. link? > Since rock is much denser than the atmosphere, the Compton effect takes > place much nearer the point of detonation rather than spread out over a > large area in the atmosphere. Therefore an underground nuclear explosion > has a much smaller EMP range of about 10 km, as opposed to 1000 miles or > more for a high altitude atmospheric detonation. > > Atmospheric tests also produce slower E2 and E3 pulses through interaction > with Earth's magnetic field that doesn't apply to underground tests. It > is the E1 pulse that is most damaging and hardest to protect against. link and what size nuke are you talking about? >>And if you want a laugh look for "1.5 million tons" (your words) of debris >>from the Twin Towers in the following photo. <G> > > Yup. 70 feet of debris from the bathtub floor up to street level would > be about right for 1.5 million tons. Thanks for the picture of all that > debris. You had better look again because those free standing walls were not supported by a debris pile. And in some photos of the north wall of the North Tower it is up against what was left of WTC6 and that can not be called a debris pile either since it is not crushed either. And if you think that part that stands about 6 floors up is a debris pile you are wrong because it was what was left of Stairwell B in the North Tower where over a dozen people survived. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg So now where is your debris pile? ROTFLMAO. >>And oddly enough all that steam could be coming from what was left of 3 >>nukes because you can even see steam coming from WTC7 and if true that >>means >>you wouldn't want to breath that stuff. > > And that radioactive steam would contaminate all of Lower Manhattan with > lethal radiation. You're right, you wouldn't want to breathe that stuff. > If it existed. (Well, the actual steam from water on fires or whatnot did > exist and would be nasty and I wouldn't want to breathe it, either, even > though it wouldn't be radioactive) You still have no links to support your bs about small underground nukes and I love the way you thought a free standing wall or a place where over a dozen people survived were piles of debris. <G> > So we're back to Magic Nukes that don't release any radiation, don't > produce an EMP, don't produce a 5.5 earthquake with the distinctive > nuclear signature, don't produce a fireball, don't produce a 12,000' high > mushroom cloud, don't produce a 1200' crater (that little glacial pothole? > GMAFB!), has Hushaboom(tm) technology, don't spew tritium, produces a > blast wave that does "nothing" upon reaching the atmosphere, shall I go > on? NOBODY and you proved it yourself ever gave us readings from geiger counters at GZ. All the testing was done away from GZ after carefully selecting what they wanted to send in and chances are the steel they sent in might have been shipped from Virginia. > How did they cram that much magic into a single nuke? (Or was it 34 > nukes?) And yet it is you with no supporting evidence to say what is needed for an EMP weapon. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 03:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <msqut8$gh9$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #520015 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mspt1q$sjq$2@pcls7.std.com... >> >> K00ktard, EMPs are generated when the high energy prompt gamma radiation >> released by the fission and fusion of nuclei interacts with surrounding >> matter (whether atmosphere or stone) via the Compton effect. This expels >> electrons with an energy of about 1 MeV which travel at nearly the speed >> of light. The electrons contribute to a Compton current which generates >> enormous electric and magnetic fields in the E1 pulse. This produces a >> near instantaneous electric field of 50,000 volts/meter, destroying >> non-hardened electronics by exceeding the breakdown voltage of electronic >> components. >link? What, you want me to find a coloring book version of the generation of EMPs so that you can understand it? Of course, you never provided any support for such claims as an atmosphere is needed for an EMP, just some 4 hour videos of some Russian kooktard. >link and what size nuke are you talking about? Any size nuke. Of course the bigger the nuke the bigger the EMP. >>>And if you want a laugh look for "1.5 million tons" (your words) of debris >>>from the Twin Towers in the following photo. <G> >> >> Yup. 70 feet of debris from the bathtub floor up to street level would >> be about right for 1.5 million tons. Thanks for the picture of all that >> debris. >You had better look again because those free standing walls were not >supported by a debris pile. And in some photos of the north wall of the >North Tower it is up against what was left of WTC6 and that can not be >called a debris pile either since it is not crushed either. I saw a pretty interesting post a while ago that suggested the north wall of the North Tower was momentarily a ~60 story section of unsupported wall. It started falling over like a tree being chopped down, pivoting at plaza level. It did so until it struck WTC6, and that caused the falling wall to break off into a few pieces, including about at where it hit the top of WTC6. The uppermost section of this wall fell over and struck WTC7 causing the big gash barely visible in some photos/videos. A lower section smashed huge holes in the top of WTC6. The bottommost section of the falling wall is the section left standing, splayed at an odd angle leaning toward WTC6, frozen at the point when the top broke off.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <8c88845b59f8d1e5ee28b5f8070170c4@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #520077 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Michael Moroney, in <news:msqut8$gh9$3@pcls7.std.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking schizophrenic > paranoid-delusional truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> li<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL > Any size nuke. Of course the bigger the nuke the bigger the EMP. Not exactly. The bigger the nuke, the wider the geographic region the EMP will cover, yes, but a larger nuke takes longer to complete its chain reaction, so the EMP is of slightly longer duration, with concomitant smaller power spike. Conversely, a small nuke has a devastating EMP spike. Because it can detonate all its nuclear load in a very short amount of time, the EMP spike is extremely short with an extremely high power spike. That's what blows out electronics. That's why the small 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca EMP was so brutal. It was literally off the scale. -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a "nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to silence them. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 18:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) |
| Message-ID | <kvg1va5ufb6ppqb0flol4vp6eab35t1gko@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #519968 |
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:27:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:mso4jo$396$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>If I use the term EMP I get all sorts of assholes saying stuff like it
>>>should have burned out every light bulb in the area. That is not how big
>>>it
>>>was since only an AM recover caught it.
>>
>> So it was just a little EMP. So you admit that there couldn't have been a
>> nuke there after all, if all there was was just a little EMP.
>
>And where is your evidence that EMPs can be created with very little
>atmosphere? <G>
>
Did you snip out something Michael wrote? I don't see anything
about atmosphere in his comment.
>Gaud you have been obviously taken your physics lessons from watching
>cartoons.
Says the mental defect who thinks the laws of physics were
suspended for a brief time on 9/11/01.
>
>And if you want a laugh look for "1.5 million tons" (your words) of debris
>from the Twin Towers in the following photo. <G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
As you already know, but are psychologically UNABLE to admit,
most of the debris was in the sublevels and bathtub.
>And oddly enough all that steam could be coming from what was left of 3
>nukes because you can even see steam coming from WTC7 and if true that means
>you wouldn't want to breath that stuff.
I doubt anyone would want to breathe (how does one breath stuff?)
that stuff. Especially with it being known there would be asbestos
particles present.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 23:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) |
| Message-ID | <msnren$4s4$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #519826 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:msndtq$frs$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> writes: >> >>>I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >>>did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >> >> That's because that Russian doesn't seem to have a clue what nuclear >> devices actually do! >You are both idiots because there is a long part in the following video that >shows people described the ground shaking the way people would feel the >ground shaking if there were a 5.5 under their feet. K00ktard, it has been explained several times, if people next to it say it felt like a 5.5, that doesn't make it 5.5. They aren't seismographs. Seismographs are seismographs. I could be standing next to a train track while a high speed freight train goes by and it may feel like a 5.5 to me, but it certainly wasn't. It was just a freight train. I'll remind you yet again, the collapse *was* measured -- as a 2.3. And yet again, you fail to have a reason why the nuclear detonation signature wasn't seen anywhere. It would be seen all over the world, including places like North Korea, Russia and China, where the USGS would be laughed at if they tried to censor anything. >And Michael if you really think a nuke detonated deep underground in solid >rock really has a air blast wave or an EMP why don't you prove it since the >US obviously did a lot of nuclear testing before their big show in Nuke York >City. So now we're back to "deep underground" nukes? How deep? 32 miles? 96 miles? They'd have to be that deep to stop the EMP from frying every video camera around, the NYC power grid etc. The diagram your Russian kook had showed the nuke as just a short distance below the surface. >Yep, we both noticed that your radiation argument fizzled because they >shipped the samples elsewhere for testing and we have no idea where the >piece of steel came from that was part of a test. The whole freaking site would be dirty, k00ktard, if a nuke was set off there. The Sedan crater was too dirty to enter for 70 days after its 104 kT detonation, plus a good chunk of the US downwind from it suffered from radioactive fallout. You wouldn't need to test a sample of steel, just bringing a geiger counter to the site would be enough to detect it. (you know, like in that Youtube video your dog ate) >And don't forget I'm still waiting to see how :a "global collapse" as NIST >called it could leave so little at the bottom of the Twin Towers and then to >have what was left standing up. <G> I already told you. Top sections of an unstable freestanding wall would break off until the remaining wall was short enough to stand on its own. And 108,222 truckloads of debris (1.5 million tons) is a LOT of debris at the base of the Twin Towers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) |
| Message-ID | <VoudncHBg-dd1m3InZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #519867 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:msnren$4s4$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:msndtq$frs$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> writes: >>> >>>>I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >>>>did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >>> >>> That's because that Russian doesn't seem to have a clue what nuclear >>> devices actually do! > >>You are both idiots because there is a long part in the following video >>that >>shows people described the ground shaking the way people would feel the >>ground shaking if there were a 5.5 under their feet. > > K00ktard, it has been explained several times, if people next to it say > it felt like a 5.5, that doesn't make it 5.5. Once again you prove you are an idiot. People said it felt like a freight train was under their feet and on in an order of magnitude that can come in at a 5.5. Here check out the "average earthquake effects" not too far below the following link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale#Richter_magnitudes But that is not the exact same graph Dimitri used and if you want to use that one it is in the video with Dimitri.. And don't forget it takes a 150kt nuke about 11 seconds to build a cavity in rock and that happens to be about the length of time from when the nuke by WTC3 was detonated and shook the North Tower to when it started vaporizing everything it could. And talking about the North Tower it didn't start collapsing down from the bogus impact zone immediately because it actually started collapsing up from the bogus impact zone just like a standard controlled Demoltion so maybe the nuke took a little bit longer than they had planed. > And yet again, you fail to have a reason why the nuclear detonation > signature wasn't seen anywhere. It would be seen all over the world, > including places like North Korea, Russia and China, where the USGS would > be laughed at if they tried to censor anything. Well, it has been pointed out that if there was a pre existing cavity it might not register so maybe there was a pre existing cavity. >>And Michael if you really think a nuke detonated deep underground in solid >>rock really has a air blast wave or an EMP why don't you prove it since >>the >>US obviously did a lot of nuclear testing before their big show in Nuke >>York >>City. > > So now we're back to "deep underground" nukes? How deep? 32 miles? 96 > miles? They'd have to be that deep to stop the EMP from frying every > video camera around, the NYC power grid etc. The diagram your Russian > kook had showed the nuke as just a short distance below the surface. You really need to do some research on EMPs because they require the atmosphere and there isn't very much atmosphere in sold rock. duh. >>Yep, we both noticed that your radiation argument fizzled because they >>shipped the samples elsewhere for testing and we have no idea where the >>piece of steel came from that was part of a test. > > The whole freaking site would be dirty, I've told you before and I'll tell you again you are thinking of above ground nukes and not underground nukes and it is clear that you have no working knowledge of underground nukes at all. It is people like you who have no experience with underground nukes that are easily fooled by them. Hell, you can't even find a video of one going off in rock because what happens when a nuke is detonated in solid rock could be a trade secret used by those that nuked the Twin Towers. >>And don't forget I'm still waiting to see how :a "global collapse" as NIST >>called it could leave so little at the bottom of the Twin Towers and then >>to >>have what was left standing up. <G> > > I already told you. Top sections of an unstable freestanding wall would > break off until the remaining wall was short enough to stand on its own. > And 108,222 truckloads of debris (1.5 million tons) is a LOT of debris at > the base of the Twin Towers. ROTFLMAO because there is just one thing wrong with your theory and that is it is not supported by real life because in real life very little remained of the bottom 8 floors and walls that remained were still standing because nothing above them crushed them. There are numerous photos of the remains of the Twin Towers and you can find them yourself because the only way so much could remain standing is if the Twin Towers really collapsed up or floated away instead of collapsed down and the only why they could float away is if they were converted to ultra fine debris by a nuke. And don't give me any shit about the debris ended up in the basement because it didn't and the debris couldn't even kill the people that survived in floors 2 through 6 of Stairwell B of the North Tower. Again, the following is not consistent with a collapse but a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 17:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) |
| Message-ID | <3i66cc-8ka.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #519964 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And don't forget it takes a 150kt nuke about 11 seconds to build a cavity in > rock and that happens to be about the length of time from when the nuke by > WTC3 was detonated and shook the North Tower to when it started vaporizing > everything it could. More like a few microseconds, babbling kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <msrdiu$n0q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #519787 |
>"Tony Dragon" wrote in message news:msnbj3$rt8$3@dont-email.me... >On 08/09/2015 17:30, Rocky wrote: >> "Zor-El of love bunny avenue" <Tromboneboy74@webtv.net> wrote in message >> news:5661-4D7A551D-2046@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net... >>> One of the fairy tales spread by the 9/11 "truthers" is that one of the >>> engineers who helped design the Twin Towers did a study that "proved" an >>> aircraft strike wouldn't bring down the Towers. >>> >>> Put aside the fact that this "study" has never surfaced; that his >>> colleuges don' t remember it, and that he himself didn't keep a copy for >>> his files; it doesn't apply here. >>> >>> The study (if it ever was) examined the effects of the largest >>> commercial aircraft of that time- a Boeing 707- hitting the Towers. >>> >>> The scenario was that a 707, lost in the fog., might blunder into the >>> Towers. Since it would be searching for a airport, it would be flying >>> slow and be low on fuel. >>> >>> On the morning of 9/11, both Towers were impacted by Boeing 767-222ER >>> airliners. Although only having 2 jet engies (the 707 has 4), they were >>> longer, had a greater wingspan and were much heavier than a 707. IOW, >>> they were bigger. The jet engines that powered them are about the >>> largest and most powerful ones mounted on civillian aircraft. >>> >>> They were fully fueled (both were nonstop transcontinental flights) and >>> flying a high speed at impact. >>> >>> The devestation was far beyond the study paramaters. The fires, fed >>> first by jet fuel, then the tremendous amount of combustible material in >>> the buildings, led to weakend steel supports that triggered the >>> collapse. >> >> ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets in >> Nuke >> York City had their marker lights on and that Flight 175 didn't even have >> a >> shadow from the South Tower when it disappeared exactly like a CGI would. >> >> But that isn't the worst part. The worst part is after all these year, >> why >> is it that only a Russian can explain why what was left of the Twin Tower >> resembles a Nuclear Controlled Demolition instead of a collapse? See: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> > >I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) did >not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. > That's because it was several small devices that focussed on the main structural supports.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msrq2p$26s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520088 |
On 9/10/2015 4:06 AM, Andrew W wrote: >> >> I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >> did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >> > > That's because it was several small devices that focussed on the main > structural supports. Andy is sort of an ass clown. -- Woodland Critters Christmas https://goo.gl/DysCAl
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mssn9f$sjc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520088 |
On 10/09/2015 09:06, Andrew W wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" wrote in message news:msnbj3$rt8$3@dont-email.me... >> On 08/09/2015 17:30, Rocky wrote: >>> "Zor-El of love bunny avenue" <Tromboneboy74@webtv.net> wrote in message >>> news:5661-4D7A551D-2046@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net... >>>> One of the fairy tales spread by the 9/11 "truthers" is that one of the >>>> engineers who helped design the Twin Towers did a study that >>>> "proved" an >>>> aircraft strike wouldn't bring down the Towers. >>>> >>>> Put aside the fact that this "study" has never surfaced; that his >>>> colleuges don' t remember it, and that he himself didn't keep a copy >>>> for >>>> his files; it doesn't apply here. >>>> >>>> The study (if it ever was) examined the effects of the largest >>>> commercial aircraft of that time- a Boeing 707- hitting the Towers. >>>> >>>> The scenario was that a 707, lost in the fog., might blunder into the >>>> Towers. Since it would be searching for a airport, it would be flying >>>> slow and be low on fuel. >>>> >>>> On the morning of 9/11, both Towers were impacted by Boeing 767-222ER >>>> airliners. Although only having 2 jet engies (the 707 has 4), they were >>>> longer, had a greater wingspan and were much heavier than a 707. IOW, >>>> they were bigger. The jet engines that powered them are about the >>>> largest and most powerful ones mounted on civillian aircraft. >>>> >>>> They were fully fueled (both were nonstop transcontinental flights) and >>>> flying a high speed at impact. >>>> >>>> The devestation was far beyond the study paramaters. The fires, fed >>>> first by jet fuel, then the tremendous amount of combustible >>>> material in >>>> the buildings, led to weakend steel supports that triggered the >>>> collapse. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets >>> in Nuke >>> York City had their marker lights on and that Flight 175 didn't even >>> have a >>> shadow from the South Tower when it disappeared exactly like a CGI >>> would. >>> >>> But that isn't the worst part. The worst part is after all these >>> year, why >>> is it that only a Russian can explain why what was left of the Twin >>> Tower >>> resembles a Nuclear Controlled Demolition instead of a collapse? See: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >> >> I wonder why this Russian (whose qualifications we still do not know) >> did not notice the lack of nuclear signatures on seismographs. >> > > That's because it was several small devices that focussed on the main > structural supports. > So there should be several nuclear signatures than, can you point out the recordings? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <2bidnS2BO_gCeWzInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520135 |
On 9/11/2015 7:58 AM, Tony Dragon wrote: > So there should be several nuclear signatures than, can you point out > the recordings? 14 years and they're still trying to claim nukes... Getting into hollow earth length kookdom --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HcydneDEw5vIYWzInZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520137 |
"george152" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message news:2bidnS2BO_gCeWzInZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com... > On 9/11/2015 7:58 AM, Tony Dragon wrote: > >> So there should be several nuclear signatures than, can you point out >> the recordings? > 14 years and they're still trying to claim nukes... > Getting into hollow earth length kookdom And to this date almost 14 years later a Nuclear Controlled Demolition is still the only explanation for what survived of the Twin Towers. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And do not forget that what is used to debunk the mini-nukes theory does not debunk the Nuclear Controlled Demolition testimony. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web