Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #586739 > unrolled thread

Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 21:22 -0700
    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 00:24 -0400
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 21:53 -0700
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-26 08:50 -0500
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 13:21 -0400
          Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 13:47 -0400
            Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 11:18 -0700
              Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 14:28 -0400
                Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 11:32 -0700
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 11:51 -0700
                    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 03:46 -0700
                Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 12:56 -0700
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 16:05 -0400
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 16:28 -0500
              Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 13:56 -0500
                Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 12:02 -0700
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 14:06 -0500
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 12:51 -0700
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-26 14:00 -0700
                    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying olli.dp3@gmail.com - 2016-06-26 16:50 -0700
                      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 21:09 -0500
                      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-26 21:54 -0700
                        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-27 12:52 -0700
                          Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-27 20:10 -0700
            Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 12:03 -0700
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-06-27 20:59 +0200
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 15:30 -0500
    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-26 04:56 +0000
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 22:56 -0700
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-26 17:36 +0000
          Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 13:46 -0500
            Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-26 20:40 +0000
              Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 17:19 -0500
                Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-26 23:31 +0000
          Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-26 19:43 +0000
            Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 16:17 -0500
              Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-26 23:32 +0000
                Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-06-27 23:39 +0000
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-28 00:21 +0000
                  Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 08:17 -0500
                    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-06-28 19:34 -0400
                      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-29 00:10 +0000
                        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-06-28 20:24 -0400
                          Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-29 01:22 +0000
                          Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-28 21:56 -0500
                      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 08:31 -0500
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-06-27 21:04 +0200
    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-26 15:28 +1000
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 22:51 -0700
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 13:27 -0400
        Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-28 11:57 +1000
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-26 12:03 -0500
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 09:55 -0700
    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 00:29 -0700
    Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 08:46 -0700
    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-26 14:20 -0400
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-06-27 15:25 -0400
    Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-06-26 15:52 -0400
      Re: Google Groups seems to be pretty much dead or on the verge of dying Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 13:46 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#586857

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:50:15 -0700 (PDT),
olli.dp3@gmail.com wrote:

> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 4:00:50 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Did you have anything to do with Sam having to leave this group, Mr. group administrator?
>> 
>> Double-A
> 
>    After 20 some years, Sam has simply lost interest.  Any 
> are welcome to stay in touch via email.
>

Tell him if this is because of his role in Act II
Clutter says it was just a joke. Intention was to make
him happy, not sad.  

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586885

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>  wrote from his pulpit
at his Remedial Night School for Adults at <olli.dp3@gmail.com>
>
Double-A "Abner Afterduft" the "Alcoholic Addict"  wrote:
>> Did you Full Swine <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier 
>> have anything to do with Sam having to leave this group? 
>> Double-A, "Abner Afterduft" aka "Anon Yidd Mouse".
> 
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>   After 20 some years, me, Sam, has simply lost interest.  
> Any are welcome to stay in touch via email at <olli.dp3@gmail.com>.
> 
hanson wrote:
So, Sam, has Full Swine & Cretin Glazier already phoned
you?... like Glazier did at/during your last hiatus?
>
Is Glazier the Full Swine, who claims to be deaf as a stone,
still "sharp as a tack" on the phone?  ..... If so, then just
repeat what you told Loudmouth Glazier below.
>
It's too bad that YOU left and NOT Cretin Glazier. Pity.
So, come on back, Sam. I always liked your Service as
you being s.p.'s librarian. You are a good man, Sam.
>
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>
"Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
"reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
"reber, you don't believe in science."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586961

On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 9:55:00 PM UTC-7, hanson wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>  wrote from his pulpit
> at his Remedial Night School for Adults at <olli.dp3@gmail.com>
> >
> Double-A "Abner Afterduft" the "Alcoholic Addict"  wrote:
> >> Did you Full Swine <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier 
> >> have anything to do with Sam having to leave this group? 
> >> Double-A, "Abner Afterduft" aka "Anon Yidd Mouse".
> > 
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   After 20 some years, me, Sam, has simply lost interest.  
> > Any are welcome to stay in touch via email at <olli.dp3@gmail.com>.
> > 
> hanson wrote:
> So, Sam, has Full Swine & Cretin Glazier already phoned
> you?... like Glazier did at/during your last hiatus?
> >
> Is Glazier the Full Swine, who claims to be deaf as a stone,
> still "sharp as a tack" on the phone?  ..... If so, then just
> repeat what you told Loudmouth Glazier below.
> >
> It's too bad that YOU left and NOT Cretin Glazier. Pity.
> So, come on back, Sam. I always liked your Service as
> you being s.p.'s librarian. You are a good man, Sam.
> >
> Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> "Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
> "Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
> "Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
> >
> "Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
> "Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
> "Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
> >
> "reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
> "reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
> "reber, you don't believe in science."


hanson, if you could also lose interest in this group, it would be for the best.  Do it for science!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587059

<double-a3@hush.com> "Double-A" "Abner Afterduft" 
the "Alcoholic Addict"  wrote: 
> hanson wrote:
>
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>  wrote from his pulpit
>> at his Remedial Night School for Adults at <olli.dp3@gmail.com>
>> >
>> Double-A "Abner Afterduft" the "Alcoholic Addict"  wrote:
>> >> Did you Full Swine <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier 
>> >> have anything to do with Sam having to leave this group? 
>> >> Double-A, "Abner Afterduft" aka "Anon Yidd Mouse".
>> > 
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >   After 20 some years, me, Sam, has simply lost interest.  
>> > Any are welcome to stay in touch via email at <olli.dp3@gmail.com>.
>> > 
>> hanson wrote:
>> So, Sam, has Full Swine & Cretin Glazier already phoned
>> you?... like Glazier did at/during your last hiatus?
>> >
>> Is Glazier the Full Swine, who claims to be deaf as a stone,
>> still "sharp as a tack" on the phone?  ..... If so, then just
>> repeat what you told Loudmouth Glazier below.
>> >
>> It's too bad that YOU left and NOT Cretin Glazier. Pity.
>> So, come on back, Sam. I always liked your Service as
>> you being s.p.'s librarian. You are a good man, Sam.
>> >
>> Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> "Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
>> "Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
>> "Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>> >
>> "Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
>> "Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
>> "Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>> >
>> "reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
>> "reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
>> "reber, you don't believe in science."
> 
"Abner Afterduft" the "Alcoholic Addict"  wrote: 
> hanson, if you could also lose interest in this group, 
it would be for the best.  Do it for science! -- Double-A
>
hanson wrote:
"For the best"?.... Abner, your "best" is to be like Glazier,
you said.... The science you refer to is Glazier's
Gutter-physics, his Glazierola, and your own science
that is described in #  =3= below, right after...
>
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier, the loud mouth,
the Jewish Jailbird, the Hatemonger, Liar, schizoid mental
cripple, Pervert Face-Shitter,  criminal Graveyard vandal,
Bigot, Racist, War-monger & Communist in the persona of
:B::ert Glazier introduced himself with/as....
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
:B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
:B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
:B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
:B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
about which ....
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
"Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:
>
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker"....
"Bert you are senile, dazed & confused"
"Bert, you are Fucked in the head.
>
"Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike."
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
>
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
>
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot"... .... .... about which....
 >
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>
"Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
"reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
"reber, you don't believe in science."
>
Aviator Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
>
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
>
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I know, you reber are an idiot. Glazier, you are babbling
desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for?
Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" Ben Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is...
and promote that shitting into a bucket in a car is an achievement
that is a laudable accomplishment... and both being Communists
they demand entitlement to goods and services that were created
by hardworking people while they themselves drink, party and frolic!...
... still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old Minnie Mouse van that you use as your residence
on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
 >
 "What are they gonna say when Swine Glazier dies? Are
they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Full-Swine, announced and posted at
the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
>
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always
post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after
which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
after...
>
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"...
 >
hanson wrote:
Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
"put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
legacy, is because:
 >
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
 >
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you Swine, you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>
which is why  the mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>
badly needs to be administered to with
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> ...
>
Now Glazier, you filthy Swine, "you will never be loved by all"
but incredibly, Glazier, you have a few groupies who love you,
and haved become, voluntarily,  your personal slaves of
Faceshitter Glazier, who demonstrate their worship & their
devotion to their master Glazier, by lying under & literally
shit-eating Glazier's turds:
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
such as:
>
=1=
Sefton "john" <johnsefton288@gmail.com> the delusional
vegetarian loud-mouth from Canuckistan's town of Regina
is under the influence of his Lysergic- and  Solanine
contaminated diet and so Sefton lays himself with gusto
under Face-shitter Glazier's Sphincter and enjoys eating
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
and Sefton is impressed also with the Hate-mongering of
>
=2=
<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> is Iran's Glazier.
The Freak Muslime Mehram Maleki, HATES Western
culture & the USA, yet Maldrecki lays himself UNDER
the Sphincter of Face shitter Jew Glazier who bragged
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki", which the gay, Iranian 
Muslime, Mehram Maldrecki, consumed until he turned black
& posted his <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-Mehram-Selfie>
>
Then the 88 Year old Glazier announced that "Glazier is a 
Transvestite who dons female dresses & a Sarah Palin mask, 
saying that he has "nice legs"... which so impressed Maldrecki
that Maleki showed his devotion and solidarity by going LGBT
& had a Sex change operation, whose result she posted in 
<http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>.
>
=3=
"AA" <double-a3@hush.com> "Abner Afterduft" the "Alcoholic
Addict" doubles as <nobody@home.invalid> "Anon E. Mouse"
or Anon Y. Mouse", "Anon Yidd Mouse" who does NOT mind
that Full-swine Glazier is a Face shitter and a criminal Grave
yard vandal who never recanted nor apologized for that. -- 
>
Aux contraire, Yidd Mouse, the Kike, comes to the defense &
 aid of Full Swine Glazier's criminality, & worse, the Jewish Pig
"Anon Yidd Mouse" curses folks that point at Glazier's behavior,
which makes Yidd Mouse to be a perfect example of the lurid
"Closeness" which the eminent Jewish Scholar Harold Wallace
Rosenthal describes in his epic
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
=4=
Strangely, the Austrian Hitleryouth Halbmutt Wabnigger,
<hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> sides with Glazier too, but said:
____   "Jews are a residue of failed evolution" _______
>
=5=
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>, the "Rectal Vacuumist (Seattle) who not
only eats Glazier's turds, but greedily sucks them out of Glazier's
sphincter, especially when they are Methamphetamine preloaded.
>
=6=
... and even earlier, ironically, signed up was kike "Bodaisky",
who lied and claimed to be "Bo Dai" from China, but swas
in fact "Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> aka
"Fagie Bodaisky", who lives off the tips he gets from being
a rest-room attendant in a NY Bath house for gay Jews.
>
=7=
<trudi.schwander@gmail.com> is another stinky & filthy
AshkeNAZI, a twatt to boot, who enjoys spending her
time under Glazier's Sphincter like the ones above. Like
those pigs s/he does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging
to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but
s/he objects and groans when that is pointed out & comes
runnning to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier. Just 
like =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
>
This bizarre perversion is well documented as seen here in:
<http://tinyurl.com/magnum-opus-the-rectal-jew>
<https://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/>
<https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=jewish+cop

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586790

On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:47:10 AM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:21:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:53:13 -0700 (PDT), Louis Savain wrote:
> >
> >>On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 9:24:15 PM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:22:02 -0700 (PDT), Louis Savain wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> >Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
> >>> 
> >>> Usenet isn't a service of Google.
> >>
> >>Makes no difference. 
> >
> >Except to reveal your false premise.
> >
> >>Both usenet and Google Groups are dead.
> >
> >Then your post appeared here ... how?
> >
> >> Most people have moved on to other social networks.
> >
> >You are free to follow dispersing crowds.
> 
> Uncle Al was one of the best posters in this group.
> 
> Now his posts are in isolated fragments of web-based fora:
> http://physics.stackexchange.com/users/35311/uncle-al
> https://disqus.com/by/Xemist/
> http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2013/11/07/old-thesis-club-experiments-on-gravitation-by-earle-milton-bigsbee-1932/
> 
> This is what you would call "progress?"
> 
> 
> >Buh bye.
> >
> >Do you always ask for the door to be sealed behind you when you leave?

Uncle Al is a racist and pompous asshole who still has not figured out that science is politics. I once tried to explain to Uncle Al that a universe in which only relative motion and position exist is a self-referential universe. It flew right past his head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586949

In article <b29ab5bf-6804-48c5-ba9c-d6b68694aabb@googlegroups.com>
Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 9:24:15 PM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:22:02 -0700 (PDT), Louis Savain wrote:
> >
> > >Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
> >
> > Usenet isn't a service of Google.
>
> Makes no difference. Both usenet and Google Groups are dead. Most people have moved on to other social networks.

So why don't you follow them?

https://americanloons.blogspot.nl/2014/07/1112-louis-savain.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586978

On 6/25/2016 11:53 PM, Louis Savain wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 9:24:15 PM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:22:02 -0700 (PDT), Louis Savain wrote:
>>
>>> Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to greener pastures.
>>> It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>>
>> Usenet isn't a service of Google.
>
> Makes no difference. Both usenet and Google Groups are dead. Most people have moved on to
> other social networks.
>

Completely agree. Suggest you abandon this anachronism.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586744

Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
> Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
> greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.

USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586749

On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
> 
> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586775

Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
>> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>> 
>> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
>> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.

A huge portion of serious posters were driven away by the drivel and
nonsense of Google kook posters.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586784

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:36:45 -0000,
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
>>> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>>> 
>>> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
>>> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jim Pennino
>> 
>> It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.
> 
> A huge portion of serious posters were driven away by the drivel and
> nonsense of Google kook posters.
> 

I doubt that. We always had option of using kill
files. Main reason for losing some of the regulars in
this forum is that they had unreal expectations from a
hangout. A hangout is a hangout. It's not a school, a
court of law, a podium, a church, a club, a
fraternity, ... You come to hear some news and give
some, say some concerns and listen to some, crack a
joke and leave till next day. And you do it while time
is available. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586808

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:36:45 -0000,
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
>>>> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>>>> 
>>>> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
>>>> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jim Pennino
>>> 
>>> It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.
>> 
>> A huge portion of serious posters were driven away by the drivel and
>> nonsense of Google kook posters.
>> 
> 
> I doubt that.

Before Google and web interfaces, one had to be intelligent enough
to use a command line and format a line of text and sentences into
paragraphs.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586823

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:40:25 -0000,
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:36:45 -0000,
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
>>>>> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>>>>> 
>>>>> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
>>>>> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Jim Pennino
>>>> 
>>>> It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.
>>> 
>>> A huge portion of serious posters were driven away by the drivel and
>>> nonsense of Google kook posters.
>>> 
>> 
>> I doubt that.
> 
> Before Google and web interfaces, one had to be intelligent enough
> to use a command line and format a line of text and sentences into
> paragraphs.
> 

No I still think usenet is not a place to contribute
knowledge. This was realized by good contributors and
they left. It resulted from what usenet is. 

Reason why usenet is not the place for serious
learning of a subject is that there is more than
enough to do elsewhere. We can't even finish a tenth
of what we can learn adequately via books. How do you
expect people who are serious about learning to come
to a place like usenet to do that? 

But use usenet as a hangout and you'll always be happy
to spend a few minutes of your time in it. Expect more
and you're a gonner. It is not good enough for that. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586831

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:40:25 -0000,
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:36:45 -0000,
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
>>>>>> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
>>>>>> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Jim Pennino
>>>>> 
>>>>> It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.
>>>> 
>>>> A huge portion of serious posters were driven away by the drivel and
>>>> nonsense of Google kook posters.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I doubt that.
>> 
>> Before Google and web interfaces, one had to be intelligent enough
>> to use a command line and format a line of text and sentences into
>> paragraphs.
>> 
> 
> No I still think usenet is not a place to contribute
> knowledge. This was realized by good contributors and
> they left. It resulted from what usenet is. 

It resulted from babbling, gibbering kooks.
 
> Reason why usenet is not the place for serious
> learning of a subject

USNET was never intended to be any such thing.

> But use usenet as a hangout

That is what things like twitter and facebook are for.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586798

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:

>Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:01:07 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Most of the old usenet denizens have either passed away or moved to
>>> > greener pastures. It's time that Google retire this service, IMO.
>>> 
>>> USENET is not part of Google and Google dropping it's gateway to USENET
>>> would rid us of a LOT of idiot posters.
>> 
>> It would make no difference. Usenet is almost dead.

>A huge portion of serious posters were driven away by the drivel and
>nonsense of Google kook posters.

Yes, removing Google posting access to Usenet will make a lot of people
happy as fewer kooks and trolls will bother to access Usenet.

Heck, a few old-timers still mourn "Eternal September", the time when mass 
access to Usenet was granted (by AOL?) meaning the posters of Usenet were
no longer just academic and computer industry types.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586813

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:43:24 +0000 (UTC), Michael
Moroney wrote:

> Yes, removing Google posting access to Usenet will make a lot of people
> happy as fewer kooks and trolls will bother to access Usenet.

If your idea had been implemented, nobody would've
stayed in usenet. Anybody admitted into it would soon
realize this isn't a place to learn and would leave.
This place, from day one of its creation was a place
for casual talk and nothing more. They all came and
come to be in a hangout. 

It's not a bad idea if you insist though. Be my guest.
Do something about it. Perhaps it _is_ time to call
such never ending bluffs.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586835

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:43:24 +0000 (UTC), Michael
> Moroney wrote:
> 
>> Yes, removing Google posting access to Usenet will make a lot of people
>> happy as fewer kooks and trolls will bother to access Usenet.
> 
> If your idea had been implemented,

It would make a lot of people happy.

USENET does not require Google or a web browser.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587016

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:32:21 +0000, jimp wrote:

> 
> USENET does not require Google or a web browser.
>

Exactly.

Usenet does not require registrations, logins, cookies, javascript,
moderation, or any of the other crap that make web forums a total
pain in the ass.

I can't understand why a lot of physics action has moved to 
e.g. physicsforums.com when Usenet is far less burdensome and
far more open.

Human beings are idiots is the only conclusion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587038

Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:32:21 +0000, jimp wrote:
> 
>> 
>> USENET does not require Google or a web browser.
>>
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> Usenet does not require registrations, logins, cookies, javascript,
> moderation, or any of the other crap that make web forums a total
> pain in the ass.

Many USENET groups are moderated.

> I can't understand why a lot of physics action has moved to 
> e.g. physicsforums.com when Usenet is far less burdensome and
> far more open.

Because sci.physics is not moderated and full of babbling kooks, the flat
out insane, and spammers.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587097

On 6/27/2016 6:39 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:32:21 +0000, jimp wrote:
>
>>
>> USENET does not require Google or a web browser.
>>
>
> Exactly.
>
> Usenet does not require registrations, logins, cookies, javascript,
> moderation, or any of the other crap that make web forums a total
> pain in the ass.
>
> I can't understand why a lot of physics action has moved to
> e.g. physicsforums.com when Usenet is far less burdensome and
> far more open.
>
> Human beings are idiots is the only conclusion.
>

Maybe the things that annoy you don't annoy others so much. Are you so 
arrogant that if others do not share your priorities, then they are wrong?


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web