Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 205 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <ifydnRxwl4XQ237InZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517908 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:00c8c43d4db88592a06c0183aa3fe2d0@dizum.com... I keep looking for you to address the following photo: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg and to date all you say is: "All the shows is a picture of the WTC site and a bunch of unrelated lines some kook drew." Because it also shows walls that remained standing of the Twin Towers despite the rumor of a collapsing building which was really nothing more than a building that lost it molecular bond for some reason and was crushed by the upper part of the Twin Towers that could not be vaporized by a 150kt nuke. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition And once the top part came down it too was vaporized so the only part of the Twin Towers that were left standing were the parts out of reach of the spread pattern of the nuke buried around 77 meters below ground. And what those lines show is where the nukes had to be planted so the walls that remained standing of the Twin Towers would remain standing. DUH. And don't forget I never believed the bullshit about Flight 93 or Flight 77 but it took me 9 more years before I realized that what we really saw in Nuke York City were just CGIs and nukes. And the following videos helped there: 07 - The Key https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds and 04 - Phenomena https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU As for the CGIs. All they needed was a 3D layout of Nuke York City, a flight path for the CGI and a synchronization flash which anybody with money or the want for more money by starting needless wars would have been able to come up with. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <mrvto4$6u9$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517915 |
On 8/30/2015 1:06 PM, Rocky wrote:
<snip K0ok BabBle>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <424d8191a206ff27a6ca48026bf151e0@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517915 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver), in <news:ifydnRxwl4XQ237InZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:00c8c43d4db88592a06c0183aa3fe2d0@dizum.com... > I keep looking for you to address the following photo: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg That shows nothing except the paranoid-delusional mind-fucked rantings of a schizophrenic just as insane as you, Roger. Besides, that's been addressed several times... that you run away from reality and the simple explanation of building engineering and physics, instead opting to believe in wholly impossible kooky conspiracy theories which violate the laws of physics proves just how broken your woman-stalking failed truck driver brain is, Roger. LOL Message-ID: <00c8c43d4db88592a06c0183aa3fe2d0@dizum.com> That has also been explained to you. Remember? The outer truss frame sections were all tied together on one floor at the mechanical room floors (on all other floors the truss frame joins were staggered to increase strength). We can see in the video the collapse of that one-floor truss frame joining. Kook. LOL Moron. LOL > and to date all you say is: > > "All the shows is a picture of the WTC site and a bunch of unrelated lines > some kook drew." And that's all it is. Prove otherwise, or admit your broken brain believes wholly impossible fantasy that cannot be reality because it violates the laws of physics. Moron. LOL > Because it also shows walls that remained standing of the Twin Towers > de<SMACKAKOOK!> It's been explained to you in the past several times. That those "surviving corners" existed is proof that no controlled demolition took place and is proof positive that no nuclear demolition took place (along with all the other reasons a nuke didn't detonate at the WTC, all of said reality you've continued to deny). Again, simply because you don't understand building engineering doesn't mean the sane people of the world don't. Your kooky and utterly impossible conspiracy theories do nothing to change reality. You are, quite literally, the digital equivalent of the street-corner raving lunatic. Nothing more. Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. Kook. LOL > And once the top part came down it too was vaporized so the only part of the > Twin Towers that were left standing were the parts out of reach of the > spread pattern of the nuke buried around 77 meters below ground. You're now k'laming the nukes were buried on 77 meters underground, which messes up your timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video and the shaking of the towers... that unresolvable logic hole your broken brain has gotten you into. Are you seriously expecting people to believe it took 14 seconds for the compressive blast from a nuclear weapon to travel a mere 77 meters, Ko0k? Moron. LOL > And what those lines show is<SMACKAKOOK!> What those lines show is the paranoid-delusional ranting of a broken-brained kook just as insane as you are, Roger. Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. Moron. LOL > An<SMACKAKOOK!> No EMP, no seismic signature for a nuke detonation, no nuke radiation, no radiation burns or sickness... therefore no nuke. Your broken brain has concocted out of thin air an impossible fantasy because you're too stupid and insane to discern fantasy from reality. Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <4eWdnTdFF_WaP37InZ2dnUU7-XednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517984 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:424d8191a206ff27a6ca48026bf151e0@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver You asshole. I won that jury trial12 to 0 without an attorney and I would have won the malicious prosecution lawsuit too if I had been allowed to use the Probable Cause itself that had previously been used in the jury trial I won to prove both malice and a total lack of good faith. Too bad the bullshit you used above has prevented me from considering any of the bullshit you posted below. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <ms1shp$cud$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #517915 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >And once the top part came down it too was vaporized so the only part of the >Twin Towers that were left standing were the parts out of reach of the >spread pattern of the nuke buried around 77 meters below ground. Stupid k00ktard! This is what happens when you set off a 104 kiloton nuke 200 meters below ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1a3B7bkahU It creates a dome 290 feet high at its peak before breaking through. Such a nuke set off below NYC would have knocked many buildings over, including both Twin Towers and WTC 7 for the first alleged "nuke". Now imagine what it would do if it was only 77 feet deep. Of course for the alleged "EMP" to take place when it did, the nuke would have to be dozens of miles deep...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <75edne4Bo7Ft4HnInZ2dnUU7-K-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518159 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ms1shp$cud$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>And once the top part came down it too was vaporized so the only part of >>the >>Twin Towers that were left standing were the parts out of reach of the >>spread pattern of the nuke buried around 77 meters below ground. > > This is what happens when you set off a 104 kiloton > nuke 200 meters below ground. In dirt. I need you to come up with a nuke that was detonated in solid rock just like you see when you look at the photo of the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" at Ground Zero. BTW the Not Friendly Neighborhood Nut tried the exact same bullshit on me and I caught him in the act too. And since you know I can prove the Twin Towers didn't collapse all the way to the ground I can also say the rumor of the jets in Nuke York City were also just rumors as proven by: Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) |
| Message-ID | <b15e6dba71f696dc546367d0aac6f0e9@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #518159 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Michael Moroney, in <news:ms1shp$cud$2@pcls7.std.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Rocky" (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional > woman-stalking failed truck driver) <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> A<SMACKAKOOK!> > Stupid k00ktard! This is what happens when you set off a 104 kiloton > nuke 200 meters below ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1a3B7bkahU Whoopsie... that's about 70% of the yield of the nuke Roger Wittekind has claimed for *each* of the 34 nukes his broken brain has k'lamed were detonated at the WTC site, and 2.5 times the depth he's k'lamed... why, even *one* such nuclear weapon would have rendered most of that area uninhabitable for decades. Poor stoooopid Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking truck crashing kook isn't very smart, is he? Did he even graduate from high school? LOL > It creates a dome 290 feet high at its peak before breaking through. > Such a nuke set off below NYC would have knocked many buildings over, > including both Twin Towers and WTC 7 for the first alleged "nuke". That would have knocked *all* the buildings over... the base surge continued to grow until it covered an area of about 5 miles in diameter. Perhaps the retarded kook Roger Wittekind has no fucking clue whatsoever of the unimaginable amount of power locked away in even a small nuke. The main cloud rose to a height of 12,000 feet... gee, there was no such base surge *or* main cloud at the WTC towers. Now his broken brain will be *forced* to squirm and writhe in a desperate attempt at avoiding admitting it was *wrong*... now he'll be *forced* to start k'laming NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent "clean" nano-nukes (which expulsed no EMP and produced no radiological contamination because they had those magical "detonators" LOL) which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille. LOL > Now > imagine what it would do if it was only 77 feet deep. Of course for the > alleged "EMP" to take place when it did, the nuke would have to be dozens > of miles deep... And remember, Roger Wittekind's broken brain has k'lamed there to be as many as 34 nukes detonated at the WTC site. LOL He's not the sharpest bowling ball at the skating rink, is he? <snicker> -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) |
| Message-ID | <op.x371bamxtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #517812 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:39:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), > in <news:EeKdndFPxOZD2n_InZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly > jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:th54ua58g2t3hpikt1t2s8d79il07n1k8s@4ax.com... > >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:01:19 -0500, Rocky (aka >>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) >>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>> ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass > >>> Something certainly has bitten you squarely on the ass. You have ZERO >>> room to laugh since you can't answer the question I posed to you over >>> a week >>> ago about the 'physics package' of your imaginary nukes at the WTC. >>> Somehow >>> you find that a "loaded" question. > >> Oh, talking about your physics package. Why is it physics do not >> support >> the Official Story? See: >> >> 9/11 - A Short Physics Lesson - Buildings Don't Just Dissolve >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOWkseSmfBQ > > Bwahahahaaa! You fucking retard. That's another of the "free fall" > idiots... and the impossibility of that bit of kookery has already > been explained several times to you: > > <http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf> > ===================================================== > Previous analysis of progressive collapse showed that gravity alone > suffices to explain the overall collapse of the World Trade Center > (WTC) towers. However, it remains to be checked whether the recent > allegations of controlled demolition have any scientific merit. The > present analysis proves that they do not. The video record available > for the first few seconds of collapse is shown to agree with the > motion history calculated from the differential equation of > progressive collapse but, despite uncertain values of some parameters, > it is totally out of range of the free fall hypothesis, on which these > allegations rest. It is shown that the observed size range (0.01 > mm—0.1 mm) of the dust particles of pulverized concrete is consistent > with the theory of comminution caused by impact, and that less than > 10% of the total gravitational energy, converted to kinetic energy, > sufficed to produce this dust (whereas more than 150 tons of TNT per > tower would have to be installed, into many small holes drilled into > concrete, to produce the same pulverization). The air ejected from the > building by gravitational collapse must have attained, near the > ground, the speed of almost 500 mph (or 223 m/s, or 803 km/h) on the > average, and fluctuations must have reached the speed of sound. This > explains the loud booms and wide spreading of pulverized concrete and > other fragments, and shows that the lower margin of the dust cloud > could not have coincided with the crushing front. The resisting upward > forces due to pulverization and to ejection of air, dust and solid > fragments, neglected in previous studies, are found to be indeed > negligible during the first few seconds of collapse but not > insignificant near the end of crush-down. The calculated crush-down > duration is found to match a logical interpretation of seismic record, > while the free fall duration grossly disagrees with this record. > ===================================================== > > Take your meds, Mike. > > Kook. LOL > >>> And where did the passengers from Flight 77 go, Rock/Michael? > >> The proper question would be where did the passengers from Flight 77 >> come >> from since it wasn't even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. > > Bwahahahaaa! Another of your blatant, easily disproved lies: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77 > American Airlines Flight 77 was a scheduled domestic passenger flight > that was hijacked by five men affiliated with al-Qaeda on September > 11, 2001, as part of the September 11 attacks. They deliberately > crashed it into the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia near > Washington, D.C., killing all 64 people on board including the five > hijackers and six crew as well as 125 people in the building. The > Boeing 757-223 aircraft was flying American Airlines' daily scheduled > morning transcontinental service from Washington Dulles International > Airport, in Dulles, Virginia to Los Angeles International Airport in > Los Angeles, California. > > See that above, you fucking retard? It was a daily flight... every > fucking day. If they hadn't been scheduled for a flight (which they > were *every* *fucking* *day*), then Dulles airport tower control > wouldn't have let them take off, you nong. They have to file a flight > plan and get tower clearance... or are you so stupid you think any old > plane can just taxi out and take off on a whim? > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrxqlroYvyw> > American Airlines Flight 77 Reconstruction with ATC Recording - > September 11 2001 > > Moron. LOL > >>> You're falling behind on answering very basic questions. > >> A<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Take your meds, Mike. > > Moron. LOL > >> Rocky > > Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: > > ====================================================== > 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of > collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below > the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to > today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that > depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's > *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al > Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human > history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep > Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. > > 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an > EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a > nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of > the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused > the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would > have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the > immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized > your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for > dozens of miles radius. > > 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's > no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been > from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of > radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the > tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights > that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a > nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how > delusional you are. > > 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or > anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). > They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement > weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear > weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. > > 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be > sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people > in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, > from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 > MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were > buried. > > 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron > source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay > byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it > decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon > poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger > being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any > sort of nuclear chain reaction. > > 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* > *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical > support column and *NO* EMP: > ====================== > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> > You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column > buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount > of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. > ====================== > > 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to > survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be > approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature > would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? > > 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a > hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding > rock. > > 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic > taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of > satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were > detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects > were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. > > 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent > down to service those nukes (because now that you know the > neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a > periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire > facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the > technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with > "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area > the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to > admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 > years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 > to 1840 degree heat? > > 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) > that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all > 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the > Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your > kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" > (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? > > 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic > signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC > site on 11 Sep 2001? > > 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris > kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep > underground, Ko0K? > > 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have > tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles > deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC > complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to > detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up > your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which > you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference > was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion > started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The > Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). > > 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes > (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your > previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 > nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming > under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in > agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? > While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps > (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was > primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any > contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in > place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this > *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed > "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where > your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly > head again. LOL > > 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your > "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes > (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, > your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the > real city was blown up by > 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes > which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground > MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet > and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC > and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the > fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn > out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every > piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's > *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL > > 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation > byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words > "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: > <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). > > 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: > <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of > widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're > off your meds, Mike. > > 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that > got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have > is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. > > Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back > on your meds, you delusional loon. > ====================================================== > > There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of > physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by > point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp > simple physics. > > Kook. LOL > how do you *really* feel about it, though? -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) |
| Message-ID | <luj5ualq8avsmvoqqbnie62g6ksfol5fnc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517744 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:00:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:th54ua58g2t3hpikt1t2s8d79il07n1k8s@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:01:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass
>>
>> Something certainly has bitten you squarely on the ass. You have ZERO
>> room to laugh since you can't answer the question I posed to you over a week
>> ago about the 'physics package' of your imaginary nukes at the WTC. Somehow
>> you find that a "loaded" question.
>
>Oh, talking about your physics package. Why is it physics do not support
>the Official Story? See:
>
>9/11 - A Short Physics Lesson - Buildings Don't Just Dissolve
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOWkseSmfBQ
>
Your avoidance doesn't answer the question she asked.
>
>> And where did the passengers from Flight 77 go, Rock/Michael?
>
>The proper question would be where did the passengers from Flight 77 come
>from since it wasn't even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01.
>
Your avoidance doesn't answer the question she asked.
>
>> You're falling behind on answering very basic questions.
>
>And at the same time you fail to answer my question about what did your
>husband see and don't tell me what he thought he saw either. DUH.
>
I recall her posting what he saw. That it is consistent with the
reports of other witnesses, and in opposition to your delusions,
doesn't mean she didn't already post it. DUH.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517414 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City was > nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact same > thing. There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. In days gone by you would have been put into a home a long time ago, but alas now you have to be proven to be a danger to yourself or someone else before raving lunatics like you can get the help you need from mental health professionals. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <S6mdnQ0Ql4_iVH3InZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517474 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City was >> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >> same >> thing. > > There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima. You are such a sucker Here is another site about the 9/11 Hush money. http://www.wingtv.net/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrqi11$b5k$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517512 |
On 8/28/2015 3:49 PM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City was >>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >>> same >>> thing. >> >> There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. > > Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima. *LIAR*, Japan publishes maps of radioactive areas on line. *you LIE*. > > *Rocky, the lying Squirrely* > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <uiv6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517512 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City was >>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >>> same >>> thing. >> >> There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. > > Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima. No sane person ever said there was no radiation at Fukishima and Fukishima has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, you bat shit crazy, delusional, babbling, kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ivGdnbK_KeYbd33InZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517517 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:uiv6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City >>>> was >>>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >>>> same >>>> thing. >>> >>> There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. >> >> Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima. > > No sane person ever said there was no radiation at Fukishima and > Fukishima has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, you bat shit crazy, > delusional, babbling, kook. Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site It is just that our government loves to lie or not inform us properly. Oh yeah, and nuke buildings then after they nuke a few buildings call it Ground Zero and use NIST to lie about how the buildilngs really came down. <G> Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517529 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we > are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can > not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat shit crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob. Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic. <snip remaining lunatic babbling> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <y7-dnXx85OZXe3zInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517543 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we >> are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can >> not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site > > Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat shit > crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob. > > Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic. But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7m79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517665 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from > Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that > have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. The US government has no responsibility to tell anyone anything about Fukishima, you raving lunatic. Handford had nothing to do with 9/11, you raving lunatic. The Ogallala Aquifer had nothing to do with 9/11, you raving lunatic. If by "Ground Zero" you mean New York city, there was no unusual radiation you raving lunatic. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <AoednYOPu9g8aXzInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517671 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:7m79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from >> Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps >> that >> have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. > > If by "Ground Zero" you mean New York city, there was no unusual radiation > you raving lunatic. Too bad you don't watch more live courtroom TV because arguments as flimsy as yours prove you really have no evidence. <G> And I know damn well how NIST ran from addressing the following photo that does not show a collapse but a vaporization instead: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g1a9bc-h1g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517675 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Too bad you don't watch more live courtroom TV because arguments as flimsy > as yours prove you really have no evidence. <G> This has nothing to do with what happened on 9/11, you raving lunatic. > And I know damn well how NIST ran from addressing the following photo that You have never read the NIST report, you raving lunatic. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4v64ua9ovdh3164pv81tjvutp5onolcg5j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517665 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:09:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we
>>> are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can
>>> not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford.
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site
>>
>> Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat shit
>> crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob.
>>
>> Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic.
>
>But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from
>Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that
>have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer.
You're seriously claiming Fukushima is contaminating the Ogallala
aquifer? Really?
I can no longer hold the delusion that you're mental sound, but
stupid. You really are mentally ill.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web