Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #517044 > unrolled thread

Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM )

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
    Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
      Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
        Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
            Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
            Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
              Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
                Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
                  Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
                  Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
                    Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
                      Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
                        Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
                            Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
                              Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
                                Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
                                Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
                            Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
                            Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
                              Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
                      Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
                        Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
                          Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
                      Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
                  Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
              Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
              Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
    Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
      Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
        Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
      Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
        Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#517593

gilber34 wrote:
> On 8/28/2015 6:28 PM, Rocky wrote:
>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story
>>>> is why he
>>>> changed his story.
>>>
>>> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain
>>> dead, delusional, idiot.
>>
>> Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them
>> especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than
>> there was by the big hole in the wall.
>
> that makes no sense at all.
>
>>
>> Behind the Smoke-um Dope-um Curtain - 12nd Edition (2018)
>> (time indexed to start at 204:45)
>>   https://youGotManB00BS.be/VwrsXBk8JqwFlffw?t=2224m45s






Well,...Seems this KEY eywitness cabdriver,  for the official fairytale, is 
now changing his mind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvyQ0vVwjqc

So that's two, in addition to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Bn_CC_mrg

And then this witness who worked at the pentagon and saw NO PLANE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIy9hjB3DGk

AND, the new video from across the street, that the feds were forced to 
return.
That shows no plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY

AND,....How about this,....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfWBroV7oo


Gee,.....It seems your official 9/11 fairytale is now as legitimate, as the 
one about the emperors new clothes.

<AHEM>...... HE AIN'T WEARIN'  NO CLOTHES.



All of which makes the whole thing stink.
9/11 was an inside job. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517574

Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is
>>> why he
>>> changed his story.
>>
>> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain
>> dead, delusional, idiot.
>
> Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them
> especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than
> there was by the big hole in the wall.
>
> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
> (time indexed to start at 24:45)
> https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=24m45s
>
> Rocky




Well of course it was by the heliport.
Those black choppers had to dump it quickly and run before anyone noticed.


Poor jimp is starting to lose it
He's another video he can watch to push him over the edge.

9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY


And Another,....Just in case
9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypc4ieJO0pg 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517635

"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mrrfs3$d5f$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Rocky wrote:
>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is
>>>> why he
>>>> changed his story.
>>>
>>> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain
>>> dead, delusional, idiot.
>>
>> Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them
>> especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than
>> there was by the big hole in the wall.
>>
>> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>> (time indexed to start at 24:45)
>> https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=24m45s
>>
>> Rocky
>
>
>
>
> Well of course it was by the heliport.
> Those black choppers had to dump it quickly and run before anyone noticed.
>
>
> Poor jimp is starting to lose it
> He's another video he can watch to push him over the edge.
>
> 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY
>
>
> And Another,....Just in case
> 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypc4ieJO0pg

Thanks and what I got a kick out of the feds released a few photos to try 
and prove the Pentagon was not destroyed by a truck bomb and all they did 
was make people think it was destroyed by a missile and admit that none of 
the videos they confiscated showed a 757 at the same time.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517660

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Thanks and what I got a kick out of the feds released a few photos to try 
> and prove the Pentagon was not destroyed by a truck bomb and all they did 
> was make people think it was destroyed by a missile and admit that none of 
> the videos they confiscated showed a 757 at the same time.  <G>

Yet more paranoid, delusional kook babble.

How long have you been bat shit crazy?

Has it been all your life or did you slowly deteriorate into the raving
lunatic you are now?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517518

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:37:46 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:hd91ua5l6e1kb2k12oesc6b3nb381bet06@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:39:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>duh.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane
>>>>>>>>>> hitting
>>>>>>>>>> the  Pentagon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But you never told me what he said.  Did he say he saw it or just
>>>>>>>>>heard
>>>>>>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony
>>>>>>>>>because the
>>>>>>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. 
>>>>>>>>><G>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> eye·wit·ness.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NOUN
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give 
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London
>>>>>>>> blitz"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator ·
>>>>>>>> watcher
>>>>>>>> ·
>>>>>>>> [more]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question?  Don't tell me what he
>>>>>>>thought he
>>>>>>>saw I want to know what he saw.  DUH
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I told you what he saw.   Read it again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SE:  my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DEF:  eye·wit·ness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOUN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a
>>>>>> first-hand description of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon
>>>>
>>>> Who's Mike Walter?   And where was he located at the Pentagon?
>>>
>>>He was driving by
>>
>> Don't just say he was driving by,  *where was he located* when he was
>> driving by?

So no answer.   Why are you avoiding the question?


>> and claimed to see everything but he had to change his
>>>story like most liars do:  I have the following link start where he uses 
>>>his
>>>hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird.
>>
>> And the kind of bird ?
>>
>> Sparrow?
>>
>> Blue Jay?
>>
>> Hummingbird?
>>
>> <BLINKBLINKBLINK>
>
>What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why he 
>changed his story.
>
>Make Walter changed his story because of the lack of debris from a 757 that 
>is also solid evidence that there was no 757 at the Pentagon.  He had to 
>make it appear that the 757 disappeared like a bird going into a birdhouse.

You come from a false premise.   There was indeed wreckage both inside and
outside the Pentagon of an AA plane.  

If you truly believe there was no plane, then where are the passengers?  

Where are all the passengers from Flight 77, Rocky/Michael?  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517521

"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:mmj1uald7o115uinb0tr23mf4kk9j5khii@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:37:46 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:hd91ua5l6e1kb2k12oesc6b3nb381bet06@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:39:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane
>>>>>>>>>>> hitting
>>>>>>>>>>> the  Pentagon.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But you never told me what he said.  Did he say he saw it or just
>>>>>>>>>>heard
>>>>>>>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony
>>>>>>>>>>because the
>>>>>>>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor.
>>>>>>>>>><G>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> eye·wit·ness.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NOUN
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can 
>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London
>>>>>>>>> blitz"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator ·
>>>>>>>>> watcher
>>>>>>>>> ·
>>>>>>>>> [more]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question?  Don't tell me what he
>>>>>>>>thought he
>>>>>>>>saw I want to know what he saw.  DUH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I told you what he saw.   Read it again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SE:  my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DEF:  eye·wit·ness.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOUN
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give 
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> first-hand description of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon
>>>>>
>>>>> Who's Mike Walter?   And where was he located at the Pentagon?
>>>>
>>>>He was driving by
>>>
>>> Don't just say he was driving by,  *where was he located* when he was
>>> driving by?
>
> So no answer.   Why are you avoiding the question?
>
>
>>> and claimed to see everything but he had to change his
>>>>story like most liars do:  I have the following link start where he uses
>>>>his
>>>>hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird.
>>>
>>> And the kind of bird ?
>>>
>>> Sparrow?
>>>
>>> Blue Jay?
>>>
>>> Hummingbird?
>>>
>>> <BLINKBLINKBLINK>
>>
>>What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why 
>>he
>>changed his story.
>>
>>Make Walter changed his story because of the lack of debris from a 757 
>>that
>>is also solid evidence that there was no 757 at the Pentagon.  He had to
>>make it appear that the 757 disappeared like a bird going into a 
>>birdhouse.
>
> You come from a false premise.   There was indeed wreckage both inside and
> outside the Pentagon of an AA plane.

Too bad photos of the event have the debris by the heliport instead of the 
big hole in the wall.  See:

Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
(time indexed to start at 24:45)
 https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=24m45s

And that is exactly what I saw as the events unfolded.  There was also a lot 
of debris carried out of the Pentagon and if it could be carried out it 
could be carried in duh.  <G>

And what the hell is a "Progressive Collapse?"  NIST uses that term all over 
the pace and we all know the media was forced to quit saying the Twin Towers 
were a "pancake collapse" because there were no pancakes at the bottom of 
the Twin Towers so what really makes the difference between a "pancake 
collapse" and a "progressive collapse?"

From photos we can see the difference between a progressive collapse and a 
pancake collapse and that is with a progressive collapse the debris floats 
away instead of ending up in a big pile on the ground.  But nuclear 
controlled demolitions do that too.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517527

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Too bad photos of the event have the debris by the heliport instead of the 
> big hole in the wall.  See:

Too bad you are a raving, delusional, kook.
 
> And that is exactly what I saw as the events unfolded.  There was also a lot 
> of debris carried out of the Pentagon and if it could be carried out it 
> could be carried in duh.  <G>

It was carried in; as construction material and a working airplane,
you half witted, paranoid, delusional, fuck wit.

<snip remaining babbling gibberish>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517536

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:37:24 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

[...]

>>>What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why 
>>>he changed his story.
>>>
>>>Make Walter changed his story because of the lack of debris from a 757 
>>>that is also solid evidence that there was no 757 at the Pentagon.  He had to
>>>make it appear that the 757 disappeared like a bird going into a 
>>>birdhouse.
>>
>> You come from a false premise.   There was indeed wreckage both inside and
>> outside the Pentagon of an AA plane.
>
>Too bad photos of the event have the debris by the heliport instead of the 
>big hole in the wall.  See:
>
>Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>(time indexed to start at 24:45)
> https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=24m45s
>
>And that is exactly what I saw as the events unfolded.  There was also a lot 
>of debris carried out of the Pentagon and if it could be carried out it 
>could be carried in duh.  <G>
>
>And what the hell is a "Progressive Collapse?"  

     You dropped your LIE about global collapse, I see.
     Doesn't it just suck when the truth exposes your lies, Rocky?

>NIST uses that term all over 
>the pace and we all know the media was forced to quit saying the Twin Towers 
>were a "pancake collapse" because there were no pancakes at the bottom of 
>the Twin Towers so what really makes the difference between a "pancake 
>collapse" and a "progressive collapse?"
>

     Who was your written communications instructor? I sorely want to
punch him/her in the face for being such a failure.

>From photos we can see the difference between a progressive collapse and a 
>pancake collapse 

     Since they are the EXACT same thing, no one can see the
difference.
     Would you like to try a different lie?

>and that is with a progressive collapse the debris floats 
>away instead of ending up in a big pile on the ground.  But nuclear 
>controlled demolitions do that too.  <G>

     As you have PROVED, many, many times, the amount of debris that
floated away was, and is, statistically insignificant. The rest of the
debris was found in and around the WTC complex.
     You provided the proof of this, so there's no gain for you to
deny it now.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517547

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:37:24 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:mmj1uald7o115uinb0tr23mf4kk9j5khii@4ax.com...
>>
>> You come from a false premise.   There was indeed wreckage both inside and
>> outside the Pentagon of an AA plane.
>
>Too bad photos of the event have the debris by the heliport instead of the 
>big hole in the wall.

It is too bad for you, Rocky/Michael because on 9/11/01 the heliport was
located right next to the entrance point of Flight 77.

Look at a diagram of the Pentagon on that day.   Look for a pad with a big
"H" painted on it.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517551

On 8/28/2015 4:3
>> You come from a false premise.   There was indeed wreckage both inside and
>> outside the Pentagon of an AA plane.
>
<snip lies>

> Rocky, the lying Squirrelly
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517549

On 8/28/2015 3:37 PM, Rocky wrote:
> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:hd91ua5l6e1kb2k12oesc6b3nb381bet06@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:39:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>
>
> A very good video that deals almost explicitly with the my monkey  told
> us about the Pentagon is:
>
> Behind the Smoke-um Dope-um Curtain - 9nd Edition (2016)
>   https://www.yourB00BS.com/watch?v=RockyISaMONKEYJqwFlw
>

>
> To me bullshit, there was so much bullshit about the Pentagon on 9/11/01 I bullshit had
> trouble with the "Rocky Story" from that Monkey.
>
>> <click>
>>
>>> Rocky de lying Squirrelly
>
> Rocky #1 lying Squirrly + K0ok da B0ok

you numbnuts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517535

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:39:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.
>>>>>>>>>>>duh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane 
>>>>>>>> hitting the  Pentagon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But you never told me what he said.  Did he say he saw it or just 
>>>>>>>heard
>>>>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony 
>>>>>>>because the
>>>>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor.  <G>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> eye·wit·ness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOUN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a
>>>>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London 
>>>>>> blitz"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator ·
>>>>>> watcher
>>>>>> ·
>>>>>> [more]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question?  Don't tell me what he 
>>>>>thought he saw I want to know what he saw.  DUH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I told you what he saw.   Read it again.
>>>>
>>>> SE:  my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon.
>>>>
>>>> DEF:  eye·wit·ness.
>>>>
>>>> NOUN
>>>>
>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a
>>>> first-hand description of it.
>>>
>>>Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon
>>
>> Who's Mike Walter?   And where was he located at the Pentagon?
>
>He was driving by and claimed to see everything but he had to change his 
>story like most liars do:  I have the following link start where he uses his 
>hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird.  See:
>

     His claims have remained consistent the whole time. And they are
consistent with what others reported to have seen.

>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter
> https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s
>
>> said the wings folded back like the
>>>wings of a bird.  Did he see that too?
>
>For the sake of the argument let us say the wings folded back like the wing 
>on a bird.  Now why did they only find one small engine?
>

     They didn't. Why do you present this LIE?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517385

Rocky wrote:
> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until
>>>>>>>>> later. duh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over
>>>>>>>> them. LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I answered some of your newest post first you clown.  So I just
>>>>>>> didn't get
>>>>>>> to it in time.  DUH.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "in time" ?    You responded to *all of my posts* and then
>>>>>> claimed you'd
>>>>>> skipped over them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane
>>>>>> hitting
>>>>>> the  Pentagon.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you never told me what he said.  Did he say he saw it or just
>>>>> heard someone else say he saw it which is on par with other
>>>>> testimony because the
>>>>> first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G>
>>>>
>>>> eye·wit·ness.
>>>>
>>>> NOUN
>>>>
>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can
>>>> give a first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the
>>>> London blitz" synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · 
>>>> spectator ·
>>>> watcher
>>>> ·
>>>> [more]
>>>
>>>
>>> Now why do you keep avoiding the question?  Don't tell me what he
>>> thought he
>>> saw I want to know what he saw.  DUH
>>
>>
>> I told you what he saw.   Read it again.
>>
>> SE:  my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon.
>>
>> DEF:  eye·wit·ness.
>>
>> NOUN
>>
>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a
>> first-hand description of it.
>
> Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon said the wings
> folded back like the wings of a bird.  Did he see that too?
>
> Rocky

do you have chronic foot odor 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517463

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon said the wings folded back 
> like the wings of a bird.  Did he see that too?

There were hundreds of witneesses at the Pentagon; who is Mike Walter
and why should anyone care what he said, you raving lunatic?



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517156

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:18:52 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.  duh.
>>>
>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them.   LOL
>>
>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown.  So I just didn't get 
>>to it in time.  DUH.
>
>"in time" ?    You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd
>skipped over them.   
>

     He claims he ignores my posts, yet replies to some of them. This
is absolute proof that he read those posts. It is reasonable to
presume he reads them all, though proving it would require far more
work than one such as Rocky is worth.

>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard.
>
>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness 
>
>I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the
>Pentagon.  Had he attended the 9AM briefing instead of the scheduled 10AM
>briefing he would have been killed as Flight 77 hit the Navy spaces,
>specifically the CNO-IP.   
>
>Every one here who has addressed your claims and conspiracy theories has
>proven using scientific facts that your crazy claims are just that, crazy.
>Not one word coming from your devolving journey into madness is the truth
>about what happened on 9/11/01.   

     It's a sad reality that Rocky has a learning disability. It's not
mental illness.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517219

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

K Wills (Shill #3), in
<news:fglttap6kmkgjvuc629snat329112t170n@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:18:52 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
> wrote:

>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, Rocky (aka
>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC)
>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...

>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, Rocky (aka
>>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC)
>>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message

>>>>> No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.  duh.
>>>>
>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them.   LOL

>>> I answered some of your newest post first you clown.  So I just didn't get 
>>> to it in time.  DUH.

>> "in time" ?    You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd
>> skipped over them.   

> He claims he ignores my posts, yet replies to some of them. This
> is absolute proof that he read those posts. It is reasonable to
> presume he reads them all, though proving it would require far more
> work than one such as Rocky is worth.

>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard.

>>> 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness 

>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the
>> Pentagon.  Had he attended the 9AM briefing instead of the scheduled 10AM
>> briefing he would have been killed as Flight 77 hit the Navy spaces,
>> specifically the CNO-IP.   
>> 
>> Every one here who has addressed your claims and conspiracy theories has
>> proven using scientific facts that your crazy claims are just that, crazy.
>> Not one word coming from your devolving journey into madness is the truth
>> about what happened on 9/11/01.   

> It's a sad reality that Rocky has a learning disability. It's not
> mental illness.

No, he's stupid *and* crazy as a shit-house rat. No other way to
explain it. The only question is, what anti-psychotic meds is he
supposed to be on, that he isn't taking?

<snicker>

-- 

------------------------------------
Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206

Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at
home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL

Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're
embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate
clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL

Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200
sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his
brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL
------------------------------------

Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517359

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:59:53 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>K Wills (Shill #3), in
><news:fglttap6kmkgjvuc629snat329112t170n@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:18:52 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, Rocky (aka
>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC)
>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, Rocky (aka
>>>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC)
>>>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>
>>>>>> No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.  duh.
>>>>>
>>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them.   LOL
>
>>>> I answered some of your newest post first you clown.  So I just didn't get 
>>>> to it in time.  DUH.
>
>>> "in time" ?    You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd
>>> skipped over them.   
>
>> He claims he ignores my posts, yet replies to some of them. This
>> is absolute proof that he read those posts. It is reasonable to
>> presume he reads them all, though proving it would require far more
>> work than one such as Rocky is worth.
>
>>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard.
>
>>>> 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness 
>
>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the
>>> Pentagon.  Had he attended the 9AM briefing instead of the scheduled 10AM
>>> briefing he would have been killed as Flight 77 hit the Navy spaces,
>>> specifically the CNO-IP.   
>>> 
>>> Every one here who has addressed your claims and conspiracy theories has
>>> proven using scientific facts that your crazy claims are just that, crazy.
>>> Not one word coming from your devolving journey into madness is the truth
>>> about what happened on 9/11/01.   
>
>> It's a sad reality that Rocky has a learning disability. It's not
>> mental illness.
>
>No, he's stupid *and* crazy as a shit-house rat. No other way to
>explain it. The only question is, what anti-psychotic meds is he
>supposed to be on, that he isn't taking?
>
><snicker>

     It is very possible you're right. I've always operated under the
presumption that his low intellect makes it extremely difficult for
him to accept anything that counters what he wants to be true. It is
possible that he also holds the delusion that what he claims is the
unvarnished truth.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517337

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:20:22 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:18:52 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.  duh.
>>>>
>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them.   LOL
>>>
>>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown.  So I just didn't get 
>>>to it in time.  DUH.
>>
>>"in time" ?    You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd
>>skipped over them.   
>>
>
>     He claims he ignores my posts, yet replies to some of them. This
>is absolute proof that he read those posts. It is reasonable to
>presume he reads them all, though proving it would require far more
>work than one such as Rocky is worth.

Rocky/Michael is so obsessed we can safely assume he reads every word of
what is written.   That's not to say he understands any of it.   :)


>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard.
>>
>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness 
>>
>>I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the
>>Pentagon.  Had he attended the 9AM briefing instead of the scheduled 10AM
>>briefing he would have been killed as Flight 77 hit the Navy spaces,
>>specifically the CNO-IP.   
>>
>>Every one here who has addressed your claims and conspiracy theories has
>>proven using scientific facts that your crazy claims are just that, crazy.
>>Not one word coming from your devolving journey into madness is the truth
>>about what happened on 9/11/01.   
>
>     It's a sad reality that Rocky has a learning disability. It's not
>mental illness.

I think he has both, a learning disability and mental illness.  

What does he have to be to believe 6, 32, a billion, nuclear devices were
detonated in NYC on 9/11 ?   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517360

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:47:18 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:20:22 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:18:52 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later.  duh.
>>>>>
>>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them.   LOL
>>>>
>>>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown.  So I just didn't get 
>>>>to it in time.  DUH.
>>>
>>>"in time" ?    You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd
>>>skipped over them.   
>>
>>     He claims he ignores my posts, yet replies to some of them. This
>>is absolute proof that he read those posts. It is reasonable to
>>presume he reads them all, though proving it would require far more
>>work than one such as Rocky is worth.
>
>Rocky/Michael is so obsessed we can safely assume he reads every word of
>what is written.   That's not to say he understands any of it.   :)
>

     I firmly believe he reads everything I post to alt.conspiracy.
I've often tried to dumb it down to his level. Sadly, I've not been
able as yet.

>
>>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard.
>>>
>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness 
>>>
>>>I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the
>>>Pentagon.  Had he attended the 9AM briefing instead of the scheduled 10AM
>>>briefing he would have been killed as Flight 77 hit the Navy spaces,
>>>specifically the CNO-IP.   
>>>
>>>Every one here who has addressed your claims and conspiracy theories has
>>>proven using scientific facts that your crazy claims are just that, crazy.
>>>Not one word coming from your devolving journey into madness is the truth
>>>about what happened on 9/11/01.   
>>
>>     It's a sad reality that Rocky has a learning disability. It's not
>>mental illness.
>
>I think he has both, a learning disability and mental illness.  
>

     FNVW made the same observation.

>What does he have to be to believe 6, 32, a billion, nuclear devices were
>detonated in NYC on 9/11 ?   

     Last I knew, he was claiming 34. And Rocky thinks this makes
sense.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web