Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516150 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-23 12:40 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-23 16:19 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 106 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:40 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 12:47 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:02 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:23 +0000
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:50 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 12:06 -0400
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0700
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:56 -0500
caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:41 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:44 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:02 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 17:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:22 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 18:20 -0500
caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:00 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:07 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:36 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:29 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:04 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 10:06 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:28 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:02 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:07 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:48 +0200
Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:30 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 05:47 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 04:12 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.physics.cunt.scabs> - 2015-08-25 10:45 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:11 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:38 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 06:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:00 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 11:18 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:39 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 19:06 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:54 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:19 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 17:12 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:32 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:08 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 23:53 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 08:52 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-25 08:03 +0100
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 08:58 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 17:25 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:34 -0500
words in chaTRooms noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:25 -0700
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:47 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:31 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:24 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:06 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 18:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 13:09 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:44 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:59 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 15:39 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 06:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 09:58 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 20:09 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:28 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:29 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:35 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:10 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:08 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:11 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:11 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:47 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:20 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 12:10 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-25 08:25 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:20 +0000
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 22:35 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:32 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:12 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:15 -0700
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:28 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 23:17 +0000
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:21 -0500
w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:29 -0700
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 16:17 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period Nomen Nesco <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-23 18:45 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 09:19 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period Nomen Nesco <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-24 23:11 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:18 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 16:19 -0500
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 12:54 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN |
| Message-ID | <34qdnVQp9chOxEbInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516520 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com... > > The NNSA was also at the Boston Marathon bombing, and every potential > terrorist attack site before and since, you fucking kook. Can you > think of a reason they'd do that? Were they also giving people dosimeter badges there too? I doubt it. And did any of them die later from leukemia? I doubt that too. And the funniest part about you is even after the EPA was caught in a big lie about the air quality in Nuke York City is your complete failure to address the fact that NIST gave us complete and udder bullshit about their "Hypothetical Collapse Initiation." See: The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 20:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN |
| Message-ID | <mrgfrh$5ft$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516539 |
On 8/24/2015 12:54 PM, Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com... >> <snip lies>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN |
| Message-ID | <809acb341806ada982271c227b48dcb5@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516539 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:34qdnVQp9chOxEbInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com... >> The NNSA was also at the Boston Marathon bombing, and every potential >> terrorist attack site before and since, you fucking kook. Can you >> think of a reason they'd do that? > Were they also giving people dosimeter badges there too? I doubt it. Yes, as a matter of fact, they did. They issue dosimeters at every potential terrorist attack. That's standard procedure, whether they detect radiation or not. FEMA oversees the NNSA through the National Response Team, they are responsible for acquiring equipment the NNSA uses, and establishing their operational protocols. <http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1923-25045-1176/lessons_learned_from_the_boston_marathon_bombings_preparing_for_and_responding_to_the_attack.pdf> "BPHC has also used more than $920,000 in grant funds for first responder safety, including to purchase equipment and supplies such as personal protective equipment and radiation dosimeters for first responders." See that text blurb above? *Radiation* *dosimeters* *for* *first* *responders*... do you know what a first responder is? They're the people on the scene of a terrorist attack first, _before_ they know if there's any radiological threat. So yeah, NNSA did issue dosimeters at the Boston Bombing. It's SOP, you retard. Now, back to your standard delusion... there were no nukes detonated at the WTC site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Military "GPS satellites carry a set of nuclear detonation detectors consisting of an optical sensor (Y-sensor), an X-ray sensor, a dosimeter, and an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) sensor (W-sensor), that form a major portion of the United States Nuclear Detonation Detection System." Those detectors are responsible for detecting for the first time GRBs, now recognized as the most violent events in the universe. So had there been a nuke detonation at the WTC, everyone would have known about it. Kook. LOL > And did any of them die later from leukemia? I doubt that too. And I'm sure those tons of friable asbestos had nothing to do with it, right? Educate yourself, you clueless loon. <http://www.asbestos.com/cancer/leukemia.php> ============================================= Repeated exposure to hazardous substances appears to be one risk factor for this type of cancer. Workers in industrial settings, such as asbestos workers, tire repair workers and soybean farmers, are considered to be at an especially high risk for developing the cancer because of occupational exposure to toxic materials. Many of these work environments have been known to contain varying levels of toxic substances including asbestos. Additionally, two case studies were taken into account for a 1988 report on the potential causal relationship between asbestos and acute myelocytic leukemia. The patients were both found to have elevated levels of asbestos bodies (asbestos fibers wrapped in an iron-rich coating) in their lungs. The first patient exhibited 39,800 of the fibers in every 5 grams of lung tissue, while 15,800 bodies were found in every 5 grams of lung tissue in the second patient. Almost all of these fibers were found to be crocidolite asbestos, which is thought to cause cancer more often than some other forms of asbestos. The patients with leukemia - but not the patients in the control group - were also found to have asbestos bodies lodged in their bone marrow, which suggested that the lymphatic route may transport asbestos once it has entered the body. This hypothesis requires further analysis to give a concrete correlation between asbestos and leukemia. In another study by the same researchers that analyzed the relationship between malignancy and asbestos, five out of 10 cases of leukemia were associated with asbestos exposure. ============================================= > A<SMACKAKOOK!> Your utterly impossible kooky conspiracy theory could not have happened as your broken brain is telling you it happened. You are in the throes of a schizophrenic paranoid delusional break from reality. Seek immediate psychiatric help. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (). Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home with mommy. Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 17:12 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list |
| Message-ID | <d91a9597462058e4ebd856f0badf6245@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516392 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:WbmdnVQFqPKjfUfInZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:9a360155110142fc53e8f9d521321dc4@dizum.com... Cowardly snipping of the evidence that you're a fucking clueless tard, noted... >> After that embarrassment of a video you keep touting, you'd do well to >> shut the fuck up. There was *no* radiological decontamination going on >> in any of the photos you showed in that stupid fucking video. And fixored... >> After that embarrassment of a video you keep touting, you'd do well to >> shut the fuck up. There was *no* radiological decontamination going on >> in any of the photos you showed in that stupid fucking video. >> >> And I quote my previous post: >> There was only "radiological cleanup" at the WTC site insofar as they >> needed to remove the trace amounts of tritium found in the rubble, >> which came from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons >> sights, trace amounts of radium from industrial processes unrelated to >> nuclear weapons and *no* *other* radiation above background. >> >> The video you provided of people washing off worker's boots with >> fucking garden hoses isn't radiological decontamination, you fucking >> tard. If there were any radiation at the WTC site, the workers would >> be in NBC suits or CBRN suits, with full-face forced air breathing. >> They'd be washing off in contained showers with catch basins to catch >> the runoff water... do you believe they'd let the nuclear-contaminated >> water just run back into the fucking ground? LOL >> >> They most certainly would not have been wearing half-mask canister >> respirators, blue jeans, steel-toed boots, dungaree shirts and >> reflective vests, nor would they be wearing fucking Tyvek, you >> retarded loon. They were cleaning asbestos and other toxics off their >> shoes, they most certainly were not undergoing rad decon. LOL >> >> And what the video k'lames is "volcanic glass detonation cavities" is >> actually whirlpool basins carved by water flowing underneath glaciers >> thousands of years ago... if it'd been "volcanic glass", the >> striations would be twisted and convoluted like two colors of glass >> mixed together, you'd see it all twisted up... not horizontal and >> layered like rock that'd been worn away by water in a whirlpool, which >> is what it is. >> >> The truck you see being sprayed is merely ensuring its load is wet so >> it doesn't blow that friable asbestos out the back. You'll note the >> roll-over canvas cover at the front of the trailer... after the >> contents are wet down, that's rolled back and locked into place so >> shit doesn't blow out the back of the trailer. There was no >> "decontamination" taking place there at all, that's standard practice >> when hauling any loose material like sand, dirt, pulverized concrete, >> etc. If you'd ever held any fucking job whatsoever, instead of being a >> fucking unemployable mooch your whole life, you'd understand these >> sorts of things, you less than useless turd. >> >> "Strict full decontamination efforts taken including the standard >> electrical taping of boots to prevent seeping of tritiated water into >> the soft soles of human feet. This is standard protocol when leaving >> ground zero." >> >> BWAHAHAHAAAA! That's fucking retarded, nothing more than kook blather. >> If any radiation had been present, they wouldn't fucking be using >> electrical tape to keep water from seeping in to their fucking shoes, >> they'd be in hermetically sealed NBC or CBRN suits with forced-air >> full-face respirators, including rad boots. Let me guess, you made >> this delusional little embarrassment of a video, right? LOL >> >> For fuck sake, wake the fuck up, you clueless clown. LOL >> >> Your broken brain is spewing utter bullshit with no proof. Even worse, >> you're taking completely unrelated shit and trying to k'lame it's nuke >> related. LOL >> >> Kook. LOL > RO<SMACKAKOOK!> You fucking blathermonkey. Educate yourself. You're too fucking stupid to even realize how wrong you are. Kook. LOL > Here, let me put it this way: If there were no nuclear detonations at Ground > Zero then why was the NNSA all over Ground Zero? NNSA? See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Nuclear_Security_Administration The same reason they're at any potential terrorist attack, you clueless fuckwit, in case the terrorists used a dirty or nuclear bomb. They were at the Boston Marathon bombing, too, you retarded halfbrain... was a nuke used there? A "pressure cooker" nuke, perhaps? LOL Kook. LOL > An<SMACKAKOOK!> You're retarded, and disconnected from reality. Get back on your meds. > So, it doesn't really matter if there was any Radiological Cleanup in that > video<SMACKAKOOK!> Good of you to admit there was *no* radiological cleanup occurring in that video. Stupid. That destroys your reason for using that video. Stupid. Now go take that video down. Stupid. Kook. LOL > b<SMACKAKOOK!> You're retarded and psychotic. Get back on your meds. Kook. LOL > So, now I have<SMACKAKOOK!> Nothing. You have nothing but your delusional mind fabricating an impossible conspiracy theory out of bit and pieces of history like some demented Forrest Gump. Every single bit of proof you've presented proves you wrong... that should tell your broken brain something. That it doesn't tells us that you're not just insane, you're fucking retarded. Kook. LOL > 1<SMACKAKOOK!> You have zero proof. Zero. You're delusional, you have cobbled together a bunch of unrelated shit into a conspiracy theory (just as you did with that video) and every single bit of evidence you've tried to use as your proof turned out proving you wrong. In fact, the very conspiracy theory itself, the very core of it, proves you wrong because it violates the laws of physics in several ways. Because you're retarded. That you have to keep changing your kooky conspiracy theory means it cannot be reality. It is a product of your badly malfunctioning brain, nothing more. You are paranoid and in the throes of a schizophrenic break from reality. Get back on your meds, get a fucking education, get a fucking job, and stop acting like a street-corner crazy. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL I) Now your broken brain is back to k'laming the supposed nukes were 50 meters below the twin towers, instead of the 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* you've k'lamed previously? Your poor broken brain is scrambling like mad trying to come up with some way of making your retarded little conspiracy theory have even an iota of plausibility... but you've yet again run into your unresolvable logic hole. If, as you k'lame, these nukes that you k'lame existed *were* buried 50 meters under the twin towers (they weren't, but we're humoring a fucking retard... that's you, ShortBus... so we'll continue) then the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference) in the WCBS video and the time the towers fell is now off by approximately 14 seconds. Your *only* option is to make these 50 meter deep nukes you k'lame existed dig their way *down* 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep prior to exploding. At least then, they'd have a hole through which to direct their explosion, right? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 10:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <fZSdnQ5kioy0pEbInZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516454 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:d91a9597462058e4ebd856f0badf6245@dizum.com... ROTFLMAO because you are so busy filling this NG with your bullshit that you failed to see that NIST and the EPA were already caught red handed with their bullshit. <G> To see the bullshit from the EPA about the air quality in Nuke York City you can use: https://www.google.com/search?q=EPA+air+quality+at+Ground+Zero To see the complete and udder bullshit from NIST see: The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <8156c3845e551cbc95b1464986e5d00b@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516463 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:fZSdnQ5kioy0pEbInZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:d91a9597462058e4ebd856f0badf6245@dizum.com... > ROTFLMAO because you are so busy filling this NG with your > bullshit<SMACKAKOOK!> The truth and reality are not bullshit. Your schizophrenic paranoid delusional use of everyday events and occurrences while k'laming there's some nefarious intent behind them, then *continuing* to use those same events and occurrences even after it's patiently explained and proven to you what reality is, is bullshit. Your making claims that violate the laws of physics and are therefore utterly impossible, is bullshit. Take your meds, you're having a schizophrenic paranoid delusional break from reality. You think what you see is real, it is not. Your brain is broken. And why is your brain broken? Because you figured out some truth, and *they* knew you were a threat... so they've done something to your brain to reduce you to this delusion babbling insane mess that you are. Now incorporate that into your schizophrenic paranoid delusion and start thinking of yourself as some sort of 'martyr'. LOL Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke". Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL I) Now your broken brain is back to k'laming the supposed nukes were 50 meters below the twin towers, instead of the 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* you've k'lamed previously? Your poor broken brain is scrambling like mad trying to come up with some way of making your retarded little conspiracy theory have even an iota of plausibility... but you've yet again run into your unresolvable logic hole. If, as you k'lame, these nukes that you k'lame existed *were* buried 50 meters under the twin towers (they weren't, but we're humoring a fucking retard... that's you, ShortBus... so we'll continue) then the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference) in the WCBS video and the time the towers fell is now off by approximately 14 seconds. Your *only* option is to make these 50 meter deep nukes you k'lame existed dig their way *down* 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep prior to exploding. At least then, they'd have a hole through which to direct their explosion, right? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 13:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <mYmdncOGjpwb-UbInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516545 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:8156c3845e551cbc95b1464986e5d00b@dizum.com... > > The truth and reality are not bullshit. If that were true than why can't you handle the truth in the videos below that prove NIST was full of lies when they charged the US taxpayers millions of dollars to conceal the fact 9/11 was a hoax? And FYI nobody in the following videos mentions CGIs or Nukes so now what is your reason for not being able to see that NIST was a lying sack of shit just like you? The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 15:08 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516556 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:8156c3845e551cbc95b1464986e5d00b@dizum.com... >> >> The truth and reality are not bullshit. > > If that were true than why can't you handle the truth in the videos below > that prove NIST was full of lies when they charged the US taxpayers > millions > of dollars to conceal the fact 9/11 was a hoax? > > And FYI nobody in the following videos mentions CGIs or Nukes so now > what is > your reason for not being able to see that NIST was a lying sack of shit > just like you? > > The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him. he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary bullshit to him. LOL -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 04:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <da6d8b8ad56e4f2cfff5495825cd11ad@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516569 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka > Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), > <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him. > > he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary > bullshit to him. Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds. I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt the 'WTC nuke' delusion as you continue your long, slow slide into unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that would be proof enough of your utter stupidity. <snicker> -- Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home with mommy. Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 396 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 23:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <15SdnZv7xPRraUbInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516698 |
Guess again. "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:da6d8b8ad56e4f2cfff5495825cd11ad@dizum.com... > Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) > 336-643-6611 > 6913 Maynard Road > Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 > > Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric > help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother > Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home > with mommy. > > Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional > brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* > *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid > the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy > theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. > > For instance: > ============================= > A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video > *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they > must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you > believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed > over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. > > B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the > satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and > the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but > kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried > from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil > composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never > mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, > let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your > kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at > some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the > nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was > "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, > walked away for 33 years". > > C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic > replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally > radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, > which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken > brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the > triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to > change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, > walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped > the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an > entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service > personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back > into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). > > D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your > original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite > uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you > k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an > EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, > so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in > rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke > detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out > electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no > nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the > vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. > > E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried > deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up > your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but > somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that > the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that > miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, > in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that > your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of > *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL > > F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your > broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to > underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first > because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but > for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to > your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite > uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time > the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've > proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of > sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL > > G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your > broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a > desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... > saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath > the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, > where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive > metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the > vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why > did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not > just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the > WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") > and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole > seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL > > H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it > moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. > Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent > nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot > "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC > being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL > > IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from > reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And > the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little > tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very > best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot > with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even > worked up a sweat yet. > ============================= > > Kook. LOL > > -- > > Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded > that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied > having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of > course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she > failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy > and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the > DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as > such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long > before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a > mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's > "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this > k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief > that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given > 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new > AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per > year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in > decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually > growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had > the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd > used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out > so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated > the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when they're > growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that land ice is > slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); > she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling > for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the > revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to > give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a > warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature > change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same > web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature > change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then > she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being > forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the > driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been > unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the > Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 > today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented > examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative > (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a > liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative > political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its > tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of > some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used > a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an > actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist > herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple > math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he > admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every > major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was > conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil > rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed > she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound > psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far > run from five challenges to out me, for 396 days and counting (ie: she > doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she > outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and > her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss > of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she > was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the > length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more > evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a > strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring > for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough > attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 08:52 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <05bc946f63297afbaed49ad71e54e2fe@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516707 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:15SdnZv7xPRraUbInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Guess again. No, it's you, Mike. No escape for you now. <evil snicker> > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:da6d8b8ad56e4f2cfff5495825cd11ad@dizum.com... >> Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) >> 336-643-6611 >> 6913 Maynard Road >> Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 >> >> Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric >> help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother >> Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home >> with mommy. >> >> Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional >> brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* >> *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid >> the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy >> theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. >> >> For instance: >> ============================= >> A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video >> *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they >> must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you >> believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed >> over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. >> >> B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the >> satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and >> the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but >> kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried >> from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil >> composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never >> mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, >> let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your >> kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at >> some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the >> nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was >> "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, >> walked away for 33 years". >> >> C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic >> replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally >> radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, >> which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken >> brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the >> triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to >> change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, >> walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped >> the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an >> entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service >> personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back >> into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). >> >> D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your >> original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite >> uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you >> k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an >> EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, >> so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in >> rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke >> detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out >> electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no >> nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the >> vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. >> >> E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried >> deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up >> your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but >> somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that >> the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that >> miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, >> in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that >> your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of >> *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL >> >> F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your >> broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to >> underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first >> because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but >> for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to >> your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite >> uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time >> the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've >> proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of >> sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL >> >> G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your >> broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a >> desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... >> saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath >> the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, >> where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive >> metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the >> vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why >> did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not >> just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the >> WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") >> and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole >> seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL >> >> H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it >> moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. >> Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent >> nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot >> "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC >> being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL >> >> IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from >> reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And >> the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little >> tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very >> best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot >> with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even >> worked up a sweat yet. >> ============================= >> >> Kook. LOL Me wonders what poor stoooopid MikeyMoron will do now that his real-life identity is tied to his schizophrenic paranoid-delusional rantings on Usenet. <snicker> -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 08:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <1m9pacs.1kehnhv1cgspxN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #516714 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: [...] > Me wonders what poor stoooopid MikeyMoron will do now that his > real-life identity is tied to his schizophrenic paranoid-delusional > rantings on Usenet. > > <snicker> > prick -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, AUK DoW #2 <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 08:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <NpadnSggKJ696UHInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516715 |
"Sn!pe" <snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message news:1m9pacs.1kehnhv1cgspxN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk... > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote: > > [...] > >> Me wonders what poor stoooopid MikeyMoron will do now that his >> real-life identity is tied to his schizophrenic paranoid-delusional >> rantings on Usenet. >> >> <snicker> >> > > prick Actually he might have found the identity to one of the clowns that has posted with my handle and e-mail address because a lot of people know my real name and all the Friendly Neighborhood prick did was prove he was wrong again. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 17:25 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <a17c127f9905f4181e586ed0e3a27c54@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516748 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:NpadnSggKJ696UHInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall) > <snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> squawked as he pulled it > to poultry porn in message > news:1m9pacs.1kehnhv1cgspxN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk... >> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote: >>> Me wonders what poor stoooopid MikeyMoron will do now that his >>> real-life identity is tied to his schizophrenic paranoid-delusional >>> rantings on Usenet. >>> >>> <snicker> >> prick You're just mad because I can still access your webcam... when you don't have it completely disabled. Ever get your router secured? I can answer that... no. LOL You gotta get *all* new equipment, Tr!pey Old Pwned For Life, that's the only way to get rid of the multitude of back doors. <snicker> > Actually he might have found the identity to one of the clowns that has > posted with my handle and e-mail address because a lot of people know my > real name and all the Friendly Neighborhood prick did was prove he was wrong > again. <G> No, Mike. I haxored your computer. Sucks to be you. I'd tell you to call whatever federal law enforcement agency you wanted, but I'd get that call in any case. Now you're fucked. <evil snicker> > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 10:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <ib-dnYnFpPfjEkHInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516763 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:a17c127f9905f4181e586ed0e3a27c54@dizum.com... > Rocky > >> Actually he might have found the identity to one of the clowns that has >> posted with my handle and e-mail address because a lot of people know my >> real name and all the Friendly Neighborhood prick did was prove he was >> wrong >> again. <G> > > No, Mike. I haxored your computer. Sucks to be you. I'd tell you to > call whatever federal law enforcement agency you wanted, but I'd get > that call in any case. Keep digging your hole deeper and deeper because all you are doing is proving you are wrong about nearly everything. <G> Oh hey, dig this video: Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 11:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <mri5dt$1s3$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516775 |
On 8/25/2015 10:52 AM, Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:a17c127f9905f4181e586ed0e3a27c54@dizum.com... >> Rocky > Keep digging your hole deeper and deeper because all you are doing is > proving you are wrong about nearly everything. <G> > > Oh hey, dig this video: > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNDDSGWsjj_Y > > Rocky > > The real story of WTC facts that piss off conspiracy people https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-77WkoypPc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 10:25 -0700 |
| Subject | words in chaTRooms |
| Message-ID | <bf73fb44-6388-4b64-ac0f-564f8de905a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #516792 |
so, give a precis > The real story of WTC facts that piss off conspiracy people > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-77WkoypPc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <8qiuac-7ig.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516775 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Keep digging your hole deeper and deeper because all you are doing is > proving you are wrong about nearly everything. <G> Says the raving lunatic that can not get anything correct. > Oh hey, dig this video: > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 20:31 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <edae38a0c6f44d9c7720835cb03af732@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516775 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
in <news:ib-dnYnFpPfjEkHInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
> wrote in message news:a17c127f9905f4181e586ed0e3a27c54@dizum.com...
>> Rocky
>>> Actually he might have found the identity to one of the clowns that has
>>> posted with my handle and e-mail address because a lot of people know my
>>> real name and all the Friendly Neighborhood prick did was prove he was
>>> wrong
>>> again. <G>
>> No, Mike. I haxored your computer. Sucks to be you. I'd tell you to
>> call whatever federal law enforcement agency you wanted, but I'd get
>> that call in any case.
> Keep digging your hole deeper and deeper because all you are doing is
> proving you are wrong about nearly everything. <G>
Sure, you keep saying that. Meanwhile, be watching for those
government vans... they're gonna take you away, lock you in a deep
dark hole and pump you so full of anti-psychotics you won't even
remember your own name. Mike Guthrie... just for your reference.
<evil snicker>
> Oh hey, dig this video:
>
> Nuclear destruction of the WTC
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y
Point 1: There was no EMP. You've proven this multiple times with each
video you post of the aftermath, as does that very video... if there'd
been an EMP, there would be no cameras to record the collapse. Retard.
Point 2: The "dust" was small because 1.5 million tons of steel and
concrete collapsed due to fire weakening the steel structure.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMTALBYRNA>
Look familiar? A steel structure collapsing due to fire weakening the
structure, and extremely small chunks was all that was left... because
the concrete was hot.
What does hot concrete do? Well, if it's got water in it (as the
concrete at the WTC certainly would have, given that sprinklers went
off), it explodes:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjmwFGET3SI>
Have you ever heard of fire-induced spalling and cracking?
<http://www.structuraldesigns.com.au/FAQs/Concrete/Fire%20damaged%20concrete.htm>
<http://theconstructor.org/concrete/behaviour-of-concrete-in-extreme-fire/6769/>
"Rapid heat rise in concrete causes evaporation of free and physically
bound water and, at higher temperatures, moisture loss by dehydration
of cement hydrates. If the permeability of the concrete is
insufficient to allow an adequate rate of dissipation then the vapour
pressure in the pores of the concrete will rise. A contribution to the
low apparent permeability-resisting vapour dissipation, is the vapour
condensation further inside the concrete away from the fire. Once the
vapour pressure rises to a critical level cracking and explosive
spalling will occur."
Retard.
Point 3: According to the video "Extremely powerful explosives such as
nuclear bombs are required to produce such small particles"...
<http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf>
=====================================================
Previous analysis of progressive collapse showed that gravity alone
suffices to explain the overall collapse of the World Trade Center
(WTC) towers. However, it remains to be checked whether the recent
allegations of controlled demolition have any scientific merit. The
present analysis proves that they do not. The video record available
for the first few seconds of collapse is shown to agree with the
motion history calculated from the differential equation of
progressive collapse but, despite uncertain values of some parameters,
it is totally out of range of the free fall hypothesis, on which these
allegations rest. It is shown that the observed size range (0.01
mm—0.1 mm) of the dust particles of pulverized concrete is consistent
with the theory of comminution caused by impact, and that less than
10% of the total gravitational energy, converted to kinetic energy,
sufficed to produce this dust (whereas more than 150 tons of TNT per
tower would have to be installed, into many small holes drilled into
concrete, to produce the same pulverization). The air ejected from the
building by gravitational collapse must have attained, near the
ground, the speed of almost 500 mph (or 223 m/s, or 803 km/h) on the
average, and fluctuations must have reached the speed of sound. This
explains the loud booms and wide spreading of pulverized concrete and
other fragments, and shows that the lower margin of the dust cloud
could not have coincided with the crushing front. The resisting upward
forces due to pulverization and to ejection of air, dust and solid
fragments, neglected in previous studies, are found to be indeed
negligible during the first few seconds of collapse but not
insignificant near the end of crush-down. The calculated crush-down
duration is found to match a logical interpretation of seismic record,
while the free fall duration grossly disagrees with this record.
=====================================================
Point 4: According to the video: "Several WTC survivors had "melted"
or "hanging" skin - a phenomenon widely reported for survivors of the
Hiroshima blast".
And yet, there are no videos of these supposed "several WTC survivors
who had 'melted' or 'hanging' skin", and no radiation burns, no
radiation sickness, no nuclear-related radiation anywhere in NYC, no
nuclear-signature seismic recordings, no satellite records of nuclear
EMP, no nuclear EMP picked up by any cameras, no electronic equipment
destroyed by nuclear EMP.
Point 5: According to the video: "Steel structures, as well as people
and other building contents inside the towers were vaporized"... an
outright lie. Some people were burned in the fire, some were
pulverized in the collapse. There is a difference between
pulverization and vaporization. No steel was "vaporized". Some of the
lower-grade A36 steel had its carbon burned out of it in the upper
floors, turning back into iron, which melted. Some of the aluminum
facade melted. The other steel was heated to incandescence but did not
melt, a sure sign that the steel had been weakened enough to cause a
collapse.
Point 6: According to the video: "There was extreme heat in the rubble
of the WTC for up to 6 months after 9/11, as evidenced by molten metal
in the rubble"... yeah, because the buildings has thousands of gallons
of jet fuel dumped on them then ignited, the combustibles in the
buildings burned, then ~10% of the potential energy of 1.5 million
tons of steel and concrete was converted to heat as the building
collapsed. The "melted metal" in the rubble was primarily aluminum,
with small amounts of that lower-grade A36 steel, which had its carbon
burned out of it, turning it back into iron, lowering its melting
temperature.
Point 7: According to the video: "This heat is explained by a 'China
syndrome' reaction, where residual nuclear material continues to
undergo low level fission, thus generating intense heat". Had there
been "residual nuclear material", there would have been nuclear weapon
associated radiation. There was none. The video *you* *provided*
purporting to show radiological decontamination showed nothing of the
sort, as you've admitted. The NNSA issued dosimeters as a matter of
SOP, as they do at *all* terrorist attack sites. The only radiation
measure was slightly elevated beta radiation from trace amounts of
tritium from the aircraft exit signs and LEO weapons sights... had a
nuke detonated, tritium would have been much higher.
Message-ID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>
<http://www.takeourworldback.com/wtcnukeddisinfo.htm>
=====================================================
The absurdity of the "WTC was nuked" hoax
An excellent refutation of the "WTC was nuked" claims was
provided by Dr. Steven E. Jones, entitled "Hard Evidence
Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC
Towers". He summarized a few key points as:
<http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf>
===============
The data clearly demonstrate the large amount of tritium released
due to hydrogen bombs, the first of which was tested in 1951.
Thus, tritium is a tracer for hydrogen bombs, the "smoking gun."
Can proponents of the WTC-mini-nuke hypothesis explain how large
releases of tritium did NOT happen on 9/11/2001?
Sediment cores pulled from the Hudson River near the World Trade
Center site just a month after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks contain a thin layer of metal-rich ash and pulverized
debris. The top 3 cm of silt contained layers with unnaturally
high concentrations of copper, strontium, and zinc from the
towers, says Sarah D. Oktay, a geochemist. "Oktay and her
colleagues also found that the sediments contain small but
measurable quantities of iodine-131, a human-made radioactive
isotope with a half-life of about 8 days. Total iodine
concentrations were actually lower in the [WTC] debris-filled
layers, which means the source of the element probably isn't
related to the attacks."
Radionuclides. We analyzed the gamma spectrum of the samples
using an EG&G/Ortec high-purity Ge detector (50% relative
efficiency) gamma counter (EG&G/Ortec Instruments, Inc., Oak
Ridge, TN). We analyzed approximately 50 peaks based on
statistical significance (counting/lack of interferences). These
included thorium, uranium, actinium series, and primordial
radionuclides. Liquid scintillation analyses were conducted for
emissions on the total dust and smoke samples using a Packard
Tri-Carb Model 2770 TR/SL (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT). The
MDA for alpha radioactivity was 0.30 DPM (0.14 pCi) based on a
NIST-traceable 226Ra standard (National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD).
Results. We found only background levels of alpha radionuclide
activity by liquid scintillation counter analysis of all three
samples. Beta activity was slightly elevated, but not more than
twice the background level. There were no levels of gamma
activity > 1 Bq/g except for naturally occurring potassium-40.
These very low levels of radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) in
the WTC dust are by themselves sufficient to rule out the use of
atomic bombs (even as triggers) at the WTC, which could be
construed as an absurd notion as it confronts the empirical
facts.
===============
{NOTE: The elevated beta radiation was likely just as I stated,
the tritium from the airplane exit signs and law enforcement
weapon sights. Beta particles are nothing more than high-energy
electrons.}
- Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb
fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is
strong evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis.
- The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually
lower in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers.
- Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium,
which is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself
does not rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not
support the mini-nuke hypothesis.
- Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium,
actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the
background level for WTC dust.
- Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above
background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on
actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low
Iodine-131 measured by independent researchers (point 2 above)
and the low radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again
provides compelling evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers
hypothesis.
- No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near
ground zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse.
No observed melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the
Towers.
- One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where
vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the
collapse, and the building fell quite neatly onto its own
footprint. (Molten metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as
well.)
=====================================================
IOW, people far smarter than you have analyzed this from every
possible angle, and found that you're insane. Get back on your meds,
Mike.
Kook. LOL
> Rocky
Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory
violates the laws of physics:
======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
*why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.
2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.
3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
delusional you are.
4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>).
They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear
weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation.
5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
buried.
6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
sort of nuclear chain reaction.
7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
*was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================
8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?
9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
rock.
10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.
11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
"4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
to 1840 degree heat?
12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?
13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
site on 11 Sep 2001?
14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?
15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).
16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
(MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
(radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
*still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
"EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
head again. LOL
17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your
"34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes
(MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually,
your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the
real city was blown up by
1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes
which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground
MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet
and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC
and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the
fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn
out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every
piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's
*proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL
18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation
byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words
"with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID:
<43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>).
Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back
on your meds, you delusional loon.
======================================================
There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of
physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by
point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp
simple physics.
Kook. LOL
--
------------------------------------
Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206
Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at
home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL
Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're
embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate
clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL
Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200
sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his
brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL
------------------------------------
Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.
For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.
B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".
C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).
D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.
E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL
F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL
G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL
H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL
IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================
Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 21:24 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <9i8qta5lv0u7h152um4e9hnhlfjk3pdl0p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516763 |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:25:02 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>in <news:NpadnSggKJ696UHInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly
>jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall)
>> <snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> squawked as he pulled it
>> to poultry porn in message
>> news:1m9pacs.1kehnhv1cgspxN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk...
>
>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>> Me wonders what poor stoooopid MikeyMoron will do now that his
>>>> real-life identity is tied to his schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
>>>> rantings on Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>
>>> prick
>
>You're just mad because I can still access your webcam... when you
>don't have it completely disabled. Ever get your router secured?
>
How stupid is someone that they don't place something over the
lens to prevent viewing? While I like to think I'm secure, there is
always the possibility that someone could get through and turn on my
camera remotely. I have the lens covered so nothing can be seen.
They may be able to hear what I'm doing, if they turn on the mic,
but since I don't do anything embarrassing in the computer room, they
would get very bored very quickly.
>I can answer that... no. LOL
>
>You gotta get *all* new equipment, Tr!pey Old Pwned For Life, that's
>the only way to get rid of the multitude of back doors.
>
><snicker>
>
Rocky still uses Windows XP. While it's not a bad OS, it's no
longer supported by Microsoft. This means any vulnerabilities that
weren't discovered prior to the cease of support are still there.
Sadly, Rocky is not able to understand this.
[Snip of items for which I have no comment and the numerous details
Rocky is unable to explain.]
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web