Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516417 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:54 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:15 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:23 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:43 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:57 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:51 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
re, nah noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:39 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:53 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:55 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:52 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:50 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:21 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:46 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:46 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:24 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:55 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:22 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:11 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:35 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 17:10 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:13 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:02 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:32 -0500
say dUh; thankyoiu noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 21:09 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:30 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:28 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:28 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 20:23 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:29 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 21:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:02 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 11:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:06 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:05 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (iimp is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:49 -0500
Re: Rocky is still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:45 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 08:29 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: Rocky's latest delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 02:35 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:09 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 15:51 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:09 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:11 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:41 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 22:01 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:13 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:32 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:12 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:12 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:52 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:28 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:34 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:50 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:30 +0000
hah, may be not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:13 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 12:39 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:42 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:19 -0500
two noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:29 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-29 22:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:35 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 20:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:24 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-30 10:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:20 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 11:01 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:48 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:58 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:07 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:27 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:31 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:07 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 10:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:47 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:23 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:17 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:44 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:56 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500 |
| Subject | The US has been caught lying about radiation before too |
| Message-ID | <8LCdnaWImcrvg0bInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
To make a long story short, if the US could lie about the Radiation at Hiroshima why couldn't they lie about the radiation at Nuke York City's Ground Zero for the exact same reason? From: "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and Nagasaki recover so quickly?" "In fact, in the weeks following the bombings, American authorities trying to keep a lid on the deteriorating PR situation portrayed A-bomb damage as being just like that from conventional weapons, except that there was more of it." then that is followed with: 'Those already dying of "atomic sickness" knew better. Only gradually did the world realize that, even if you can safely walk through the ruins of a bombed city soon afterward, the effects of a nuclear attack continue to show up for years.' Link: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2466/if-nuclear-fallout-lasts-thousands-of-years-how-did-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-recover-so-quickly
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 15:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mrf7ji$6ri$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516417 |
On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote: > "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and Nagasaki > recover so quickly?" > If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products, you would not need to ask such a question. As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly, even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years. As the products vary very much in their half time, so activity drops fast initially, until short time product decay. Also, amount of fission material was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great people humble, but small people arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_PCdnRJ3t_K_ukbInZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516420 |
"Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mrf7ji$6ri$1@dont-email.me... > On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote: > >> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and >> Nagasaki >> recover so quickly?" >> > > If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products, > you would not need to ask such a question. > > As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly, > even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years. > > As the products vary very much in their half time, > so activity drops fast initially, > until short time product decay. > > Also, amount of fission material > was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant. > > -- > Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) > > Knowledge makes great people humble, > but small people arrogant. FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's Ground Zero BTW in reality this thread was dealing with the fact that the US has lied about radiation before so why shouldn't they lie about the radiation at Nuke York City's Ground Zero also? And I've already got a thread that proves NIST used lie after lie after lie in their "Hypothetical" "Collapse Initiation" of the Twin Towers. So if 9/11 was not an inside job that could have gone so far as to use CGIs and nukes in Nuke York City then why are there so many outright lies about Ground Zero? Oh, you want to see evidence of a CGI in Nuke York City? OK. And to this date the only person that could recreate the exact same thing the CGI did in Nuke York City used 3D software and programmed the 3D image to reflect the sky. 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg And there just happens to be a lot of videos of the alleged Flight 175 with a disappearing wing or wings that show up in front of closer objects. As for Nukes in Nuke York City? Well that is in other threads. Now a link showing the EPA has done their part about adding to the multitude of lies about Ground Zero. http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/center-science-and-democracy/promoting-scientific-integrity/ground-zero-air-pollution.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 16:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516426 |
On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: > > FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this > thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's > Ground Zero > Why then did you post it to sci.physics, if you do not want to talk about physics ? You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great people humble, but small people arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <EIydnSxqbY6hsUbInZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516431 |
"Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me... > On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: > >> >> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this >> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >> Ground Zero >> > > Why then did you post it to sci.physics, > if you do not want to talk about physics ? > > You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. 1. Don't look at me, I was not the one that originally moved my post to sci.physics. 2. I'd be more than willing to talk about physics but it appears you don't because there are a lot of places during the Great 9/11 Hoax that violate Newton's laws of physics and the speed that WTC7 fell with what was supposed to be just fire damage was one of them. Here see for yourself: EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrfahq$8p0$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516441 |
On 8/24/2015 9:37 AM, Rocky wrote: > "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me... >> On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: >> >>> >>> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this >>> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >>> Ground Zero >>> >> >> Why then did you post it to sci.physics, >> if you do not want to talk about physics ? >> >> You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. > > 1. Don't look at me, your the moron that cannot understand RA D I ATION.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <VM6dne_2Z-mArEbInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516442 |
"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:mrfahq$8p0$1@speranza.aioe.org... > On 8/24/2015 9:37 AM, Rocky wrote: >> "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to >>>> this >>>> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >>>> Ground Zero >>>> >>> >>> Why then did you post it to sci.physics, >>> if you do not want to talk about physics ? >>> >>> You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. >> >> 1. Don't look at me, > > > your the moron that cannot understand RA D I ATION. ROTFLMAO because it is you who is the moron that refused to see why NNSA was in Nuke York City and the fact that they lied about what the dosimeter badges were really for, NIST gave us lie after lie after lie with their "Hypotheses" that didn't have one supporting fact and the EPA gave us complete and udder bullshit about the Air Quality in Nuke York City. So basically you are just another liar using lies to conceal the fact both CGIs and Nukes were used in Nuke York City. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 10:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrfehg$jh4$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516450 |
On 8/24/2015 9:57 AM, Rocky wrote: > "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message > news:mrfahq$8p0$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> On 8/24/2015 9:37 AM, Rocky wrote: >>> "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to >>>>> this >>>>> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >>>>> Ground Zero >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why then did you post it to sci.physics, >>>> if you do not want to talk about physics ? >>>> >>>> You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. >>> >>> 1. Don't look at me, >> >> >> your the moron that cannot understand RA D I ATION. > <snip childlike kko0K lies> > > Rocky- the lying Squirrelie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrg17i$llc$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516450 |
On 24/08/2015 15:57, Rocky wrote: > "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message > news:mrfahq$8p0$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> On 8/24/2015 9:37 AM, Rocky wrote: >>> "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to >>>>> this >>>>> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >>>>> Ground Zero >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why then did you post it to sci.physics, >>>> if you do not want to talk about physics ? >>>> >>>> You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. >>> >>> 1. Don't look at me, >> >> >> your the moron that cannot understand RA D I ATION. > > ROTFLMAO because it is you who is the moron that refused to see why NNSA was > in Nuke York City and the fact that they lied about what the dosimeter > badges were really for, NIST gave us lie after lie after lie with their > "Hypotheses" that didn't have one supporting fact and the EPA gave us > complete and udder bullshit about the Air Quality in Nuke York City. > > So basically you are just another liar using lies to conceal the fact both > CGIs and Nukes were used in Nuke York City. DUH. > > Rocky sheeple > > I would expect all agencies to attend such an event, to determine the circumstances. So basically you are just another liar using lies to conceal the facts about 911. DUH. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrg184$llc$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516441 |
On 24/08/2015 15:37, Rocky wrote: > "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:mrf98u$cpo$1@dont-email.me... >> On 08/24/2015 04:15 PM, Rocky wrote: >> >>> >>> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this >>> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >>> Ground Zero >>> >> >> Why then did you post it to sci.physics, >> if you do not want to talk about physics ? >> >> You hijacked sci.physics for your political conspiracy agenda. > > 1. Don't look at me, I was not the one that originally moved my post to > sci.physics. > You started the thread, that ng was in your post. > 2. I'd be more than willing to talk about physics but it appears you don't > because there are a lot of places during the Great 9/11 Hoax that violate > Newton's laws of physics and the speed that WTC7 fell with what was supposed > to be just fire damage was one of them. > > Here see for yourself: > > EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7) > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ > > Rocky sheeple > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 19:39 -0700 |
| Subject | re, nah |
| Message-ID | <65298a0c-06c7-479a-83c5-04cfc3edffa5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #516441 |
w.t.c7 was a very special site; do you know, what was in it > Newton's laws of physics and the speed that WTC7 fell with what was supposed > to be just fire damage was one of them. > > Here see for yourself: > > EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7) > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ > > Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrfa2p$7s0$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516426 |
On 8/24/2015 9:15 AM, Rocky wrote: > "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:mrf7ji$6ri$1@dont-email.me... >> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote: >> >>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and >>> Nagasaki >>> recover so quickly?" >>> >> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products, >> you would not need to ask such a question. >> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly, >> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years. >> >> As the products vary very much in their half time, >> so activity drops fast initially, >> until short time product decay. >> Also, amount of fission material >> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant. >> >> -- >> >> Knowledge makes great people humble, >> but small people arrogant. > FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this > thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's > Ground Zero > > BTW in reality this thread was dealing with the fact that the US has lied > about radiation before so why shouldn't they lie about the radiation at Nuke > York City's Ground Zero also? moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger counter ? No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. (Dude, that stink weed you are smokin is moldy, your brain is infected with billions of MOLD SPORES ) <snip stoner Koo Koo Krap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 09:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nNqdnT6dotloskbInZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516439 |
"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:mrfa2p$7s0$1@speranza.aioe.org... > On 8/24/2015 9:15 AM, Rocky wrote: >> "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:mrf7ji$6ri$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote: >>> >>>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and >>>> Nagasaki >>>> recover so quickly?" >>>> > >>> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products, >>> you would not need to ask such a question. > >>> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly, >>> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years. >>> >>> As the products vary very much in their half time, >>> so activity drops fast initially, >>> until short time product decay. > >>> Also, amount of fission material >>> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant. >>> >>> -- > >>> >>> Knowledge makes great people humble, >>> but small people arrogant. > >> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this >> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >> Ground Zero >> >> BTW in reality this thread was dealing with the fact that the US has lied >> about radiation before so why shouldn't they lie about the radiation at >> Nuke >> York City's Ground Zero also? > > moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger > counter ? > > No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" and since DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies and then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do it again. Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 10:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrfeqc$kb4$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516447 |
>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >> counter ? >> >> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. > > You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the following > does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" and since DEWs > have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg NO RADIATION > Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence of not > just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies and then the > fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do it again. NO RADIATION DETECTED > > Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and udder > bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar hypotheses > that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and morons, > The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: > https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION DETECTED then or now. [...dance monkey, dance...]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrhrrt$4va$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516471 |
gilber34 wrote: >>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >>> counter ? >>> >>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >> >> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" and >> since >> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > NO RADIATION > > >> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence >> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies and >> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do >> it >> again. > > NO RADIATION DETECTED > >> >> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar >> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: > > NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and > morons, > > > >> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >> >> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >> > > all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION > DETECTED then or now. So WHO actually checked ? The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw it. I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. And like dynamite, that can take out a mountain side, or be scaled down to make firecrackers for kids. Nukes can be scaled down as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516746 |
On 25/08/2015 14:52, Bast wrote: > gilber34 wrote: >>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >>>> counter ? >>>> >>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >>> >>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" and >>> since >>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> NO RADIATION >> >> >>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence >>> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies and >>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do >>> it >>> again. >> >> NO RADIATION DETECTED >> >>> >>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar >>> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: >> >> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and >> morons, >> >> >> >>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >>> >>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >>> >> >> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION >> DETECTED then or now. > > > > > > > So WHO actually checked ? > The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. > > They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw it. Everybody else did not see it. > > I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying > there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. > If it were a nuke where was the radiation, where were the seismic signatures? > And like dynamite, that can take out a mountain side, or be scaled down to > make firecrackers for kids. > Nukes can be scaled down as well. > > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5MOdnVnENpbJH0HInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516750 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... > On 25/08/2015 14:52, Bast wrote: >> gilber34 wrote: >>>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >>>>> counter ? >>>>> >>>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >>>> >>>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >>>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" >>>> and >>>> since >>>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> NO RADIATION >>> >>> >>>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence >>>> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies >>>> and >>>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would >>>> do >>>> it >>>> again. >>> >>> NO RADIATION DETECTED >>> >>>> >>>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >>>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar >>>> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: >>> >>> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and >>> morons, >>> >>> >>> >>>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >>>> >>>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >>>> >>> >>> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION >>> DETECTED then or now. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So WHO actually checked ? >> The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. >> >> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw >> it. > > Everybody else did not see it. T-annoy you are such an idiot. >> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >> > > If it were a nuke where was the radiation, where were the seismic > signatures? The EPA lied about the air quality at Ground Zero and everybody knows that The NNSA lied about why First Responders had to wear doimeter badges. They were told it was to monitor the air quality but it that were true they wouldn't have been allowed to work at ground zero at all becaue of the dangerous toxins there and all the fiberglass in the air. NIST the place that tried to say jets brought down the Twin Towers were full of complete and udder bullshit as proven by one of the people that helped NIST run their initial test that did not go the way NIST wanted those test to go. <G> The USGS obviously removed the ground shaking from before the North Tower was vaporized or the seismic readings would have shown just background noise for 12 seconds. Now given that 4 government agencies all lied about Ground Zero why not the one in charge of possibly bogus radiation readings too? But one thing we do know is nobody was allowed at GZ for 2 days except those that helped to cover up the holes left by the nukes and then on the 3 day only Iron Workers who were probably assigned to making sure those hole stayed covered. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/04/gordon-duff-nuclear-911-undenialble/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mri215$ont$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516755 |
On 8/25/2015 9:59 AM, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >> On 25/08/2015 14:52, Bast wrote: >>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >>>>>> counter ? >>>>>> >>>>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >>>>> >>>>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >>>>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" >>>>> and >>>>> since >>>>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> NO RADIATION >>>> >>>> >>>>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence >>>>> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies >>>>> and >>>>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would >>>>> do >>>>> it >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> NO RADIATION DETECTED >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >>>>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar >>>>> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: >>>> >>>> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and >>>> morons, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >>>>> >>>> >>>> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION >>>> DETECTED then or now. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> So WHO actually checked ? >>> The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. >>> >>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw >>> it. >> >> Everybody else did not see it. > > T-annoy you are such an idiot. > >>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >>> >> >> If it were a nuke where was the radiation, where were the seismic >> signatures? > > The EPA lied about the air quality at Ground Zero and everybody knows that EPA has nothing to do with air quality in a disaster zone, everybody knows that. > > The NNSA lied about why First Responders had to wear doimeter badges. They > were told it was to monitor the air quality but it that were true they > wouldn't have been allowed to work at ground zero at all becaue of the > dangerous toxins there and all the fiberglass in the air. what toxins ? > > NIST the place that tried to say jets brought down the Twin Towers were full > of complete and udder bullshit as proven by one of the people that helped > NIST run their initial test that did not go the way NIST wanted those test > to go. <G> Lies. > > The USGS obviously removed the ground shaking from before the North Tower > was vaporized or the seismic readings would have shown just background noise > for 12 seconds. 1. Universities do not report to USGS. 2. the ground shook as tower fell and floors collapsed. > > Now given that 4 government agencies all lied about Ground Zero why not the > one in charge of possibly bogus radiation readings too? lies, upon lies. there were 57 gov agencies involved. > > But one thing we do know is nobody was allowed at GZ for 2 days except those > that helped to cover up the holes left by the nukes and then on the 3 day > only Iron Workers who were probably assigned to making sure those hole > stayed covered. more lies. Wheres the radiation, numbnuts? > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/04/gordon-duff-nuclear-911-undenialble/ > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 15:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrig96$rat$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516766 |
gilber34 wrote: > On 8/25/2015 9:59 AM, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 25/08/2015 14:52, Bast wrote: >>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping >>>>>>> Geiger counter ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >>>>>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled >>>>>> Demolition" and >>>>>> since >>>>>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> NO RADIATION >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have >>>>>> evidence of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the >>>>>> EPA using lies and >>>>>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they >>>>>> would do >>>>>> it >>>>>> again. >>>>> >>>>> NO RADIATION DETECTED >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >>>>>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their >>>>>> fubar hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: >>>>> >>>>> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots >>>>> and morons, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO >>>>> RADIATION DETECTED then or now. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So WHO actually checked ? >>>> The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. >>>> >>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else >>>> saw it. >>> >>> Everybody else did not see it. >> >> T-annoy you are such an idiot. >> >>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just >>>> saying there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >>>> >>> >>> If it were a nuke where was the radiation, where were the seismic >>> signatures? >> >> The EPA lied about the air quality at Ground Zero and everybody knows >> that > > EPA has nothing to do with air quality in a disaster zone, everybody > knows that. If you half a brain and half of that actually did some research, you would already know how laughable your response is Now watch and learn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtjpjbM_q4Q 9/11 was an inside job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2viuac-7ig.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516755 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > The EPA lied about the air quality at Ground Zero and everybody knows that Even if they did, it is irrelevant to the issue of nukes. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web