Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #510911 > unrolled thread

Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 05:42 -0400
    Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-03 06:48 -0500
      Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 08:57 -0400
        Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-03 08:52 -0500
          Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 12:11 -0400
            Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-03 12:51 -0500
              Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-04 10:10 -0400
          Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-03 11:40 -0500
            Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-03 12:59 -0500
              Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:24 -0500
                Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-04 10:12 -0400
            Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:23 -0500
          Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:22 -0500
            dusty noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:59 -0700
      Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:27 -0400
        Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 14:40 -0400
      Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:37 -0400
      Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:20 -0500
        Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-04 13:40 -0400
    Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 09:46 -0700
      Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:42 -0400
        Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 14:46 -0400
          Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:23 -0700
    Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 10:41 -0700
      a.b.c noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:51 -0700
      Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 01:45 -0400
        Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 07:14 -0400
        Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 10:04 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#510911 — Re: Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News

On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>
>>      And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
>> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
>>      Odd that.
>
>
> The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3 sides are
> proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
>
> The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it should
> have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the front of a tank is
> proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI and the people that claimed
> to have seen it were merely Crisis Actors.


So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was simply 
CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into the WTCs 
were merely actors.

And they expect to be taken seriously?


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#510917

"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mpncvv$1nt$1@dont-email.me...
> On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>>      And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
>>> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
>>>      Odd that.
>>
>>
>> The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3 sides are
>> proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
>>
>> The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it 
>> should
>> have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the front of a tank 
>> is
>> proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI and the people that 
>> claimed
>> to have seen it were merely Crisis Actors.
>
>
> So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was simply 
> CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into the WTCs were 
> merely actors.
>
> And they expect to be taken seriously?

Again in case you missed it.  The only person that could ever recreate the 
disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 did it with 3D software and you 
should see all the different reasons given why a wing disappeared by people 
that could not recreate that abnormality.

Fact is the 3D image that we saw on TV was programmed to reflect the sky and 
that is what made the wing disappear.  And Crisis Actors are paid to make 
you believe in lies.  Duh.  Besides there were a few no-planers right at 
Ground Zero.  See:

9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw

and

911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0

Again, both the jets and both the buildings are inconsistent with the 
official story because the jets never slowed down when faced with steel 
twice as thick as that on the front of a tank and 110 story buildings don't 
just float away unless there was an underground nuke placed below them but 
not directly below them as proven by the "Surviving Corners" and the 
Survivors.  Plus only an underground nuke explains the EMPs recorded by 
WCBS.

Here we have a video that proves the North Tower shook 12 seconds before it 
was vaporized:

9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret.
 Visible shaking 12 seconds before collapse
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA

And below we have a video by WCBS that shows an EMP 12 seconds before the 
North Tower was vaporized.  Can you figure out what the similarity is?  <G>

BTW others have seen an EMP in this video as proven by the comments at:
WTC1 collapse, WCBS Dub4 23.avi
 http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s

And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the 
inconsistencies with the official 9/11 bullshit.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510928

On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>
> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.


 From your lips to god's ear, Rocko


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510935

"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>
>
> From your lips to god's ear, Rocko

So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away and 
jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?

All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look at 
the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw. 
<G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510965

On 8/3/2015 9:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>
>>
>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>
> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away and
> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?


No. What I said was, "From your lips to god's ear, Rocko"


> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look at
> the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw.
> <G>


Rocko, are you currently taking any prescription medication?


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510997

"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mpo3oi$o39$1@dont-email.me...
> On 8/3/2015 9:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>>
>>>
>>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>>
>> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away 
>> and
>> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>
>
> No. What I said was, "From your lips to god's ear, Rocko"
>
>
>> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look 
>> at
>> the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw.
>> <G>
>
>
> Rocko, are you currently taking any prescription medication?

And since google translate couldn't figure out what you meant you will have 
to tell it.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511163

Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mpo3oi$o39$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/3/2015 9:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>>>
>>> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away
>>> and
>>> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>>
>>
>> No. What I said was, "From your lips to god's ear, Rocko"
>>
>>
>>> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to
>>> look at
>>> the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you
>>> saw. <G>
>>
>>
>> Rocko, are you currently taking any prescription medication?
>
> And since google translate couldn't figure out what you meant you will
> have to tell it.
>
> Rocky





https://kendoc911.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/911-meme.jpg 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510974

On 8/3/2015 8:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>
>>
>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>
> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away

Watch the films of it, the floors were caught on fire by the kerosene 
fuel they use, the heat weaken the steal and the floors came crashing down.

there was no "float away" shit.

and
> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?

terrorists took over and were driving the plane dumbass.



>
> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look at
> the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw.
> <G>
>
> Rocky

go watch the films, I did not see any "float away" shit, I did not see 
either jet slow down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511003

"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
news:mpo5i4$oc9$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 8/3/2015 8:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>>
>>>
>>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>>
>> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away
>
> Watch the films of it, the floors were caught on fire by the kerosene fuel 
> they use, the heat weaken the steal and the floors came crashing down.

KEEP GOING because you can't stop there when what happened in the next month 
is the most telling.

> there was no "float away" shit.

ROTFLMAO because that is exactly what the Twin Towers did for the next month 
and maybe longer.  <G>

> and
>> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>
> terrorists took over and were driving the plane dumbass.

And how could those terrorist make a wing fade out and in durng flight when 
that doesn't happen with real jets?

And how could those living terrorist fly right into the Twin Towers with no 
slowdown whatsoever?

All the 9/11 perpetraitores needed to pull off their stunt was a 3D layout 
of Nuke York City, some software and Crisis Actors.  Duh.
 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor

>> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look 
>> at
>> the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw.
>> <G>
>>
>> Rocky
>
> go watch the films, I did not see any "float away" shit, I did not see 
> either jet slow down.

The jets should have slowed down on impact but they didn't because they were 
simply CGIs.  And they used Crisis Actors to make you believe otherwize.
 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor

And there are numerous photos of the Twin Towers floating away because they 
floated away for a good month and maybe much longer.

Fact is anybody who fell for the official 9/11 bullshit has been bamboozled.

And once more a building collapse does not explain why so much survived at 
the very bottom of the Twin Towers but nukes placed under WTC3 and WTC4 do. 
And the nuke under WTC3 also explains why WCBS recorded EMPs.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511047

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:59:58 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
>news:mpo5i4$oc9$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/3/2015 8:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>>>
>>> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away
>>
>> Watch the films of it, the floors were caught on fire by the kerosene fuel 
>> they use, the heat weaken the steal and the floors came crashing down.
>
>KEEP GOING because you can't stop there when what happened in the next month 
>is the most telling.
>

     What happened?

>> there was no "float away" shit.
>
>ROTFLMAO because that is exactly what the Twin Towers did for the next month 
>and maybe longer.  <G>
>

     And again you're reduced to flat out lying.

>> and
>>> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>>
>> terrorists took over and were driving the plane dumbass.
>
>And how could those terrorist make a wing fade out and in durng flight when 
>that doesn't happen with real jets?
>

     Since it didn't happen with either jet that attacked the twin
towers, your question remains as stupid as it ever has.

>And how could those living terrorist fly right into the Twin Towers with no 
>slowdown whatsoever?

     Real easy. They flew in at the speed the craft was flying.
     DUH!

>
>All the 9/11 perpetraitores needed to pull off their stunt was a 3D layout 
>of Nuke York City, some software and Crisis Actors.  Duh.
> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor

     And yet, there is ZERO evidence that this happened.
     Odd that.

>
>>> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look 
>>> at the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw.
>>> <G>
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> go watch the films, I did not see any "float away" shit, I did not see 
>> either jet slow down.
>
>The jets should have slowed down on impact but they didn't because they were 
>simply CGIs.  And they used Crisis Actors to make you believe otherwize.
> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor
>

     You've yet to present any evidence of CGI.

>And there are numerous photos of the Twin Towers floating away because they 
>floated away for a good month and maybe much longer.
>

     This LIE of yours has been exposed numerous times. What is at the
root of your continuing to present this same lie?
     Serious question.

>Fact is anybody who fell for the official 9/11 bullshit has been bamboozled.

     You mean the troofers are all morons.

>
>And once more a building collapse does not explain why so much survived at 
>the very bottom of the Twin Towers but nukes placed under WTC3 and WTC4 do. 
>And the nuke under WTC3 also explains why WCBS recorded EMPs.

     Not so, as you already know. If only your mind were capable of
admitting the truth of the matter. 

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511164

K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:59:58 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>> news:mpo5i4$oc9$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>> On 8/3/2015 8:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>>>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>>>>
>>>> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float
>>>> away
>>>
>>> Watch the films of it, the floors were caught on fire by the kerosene
>>> fuel they use, the heat weaken the steal and the floors came crashing
>>> down.
>>
>> KEEP GOING because you can't stop there when what happened in the next
>> month is the most telling.
>>
>
>     What happened?
>
>>> there was no "float away" shit.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because that is exactly what the Twin Towers did for the next
>> month and maybe longer.  <G>
>>
>
>     And again you're reduced to flat out lying.
>
>>> and
>>>> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>>>
>>> terrorists took over and were driving the plane dumbass.
>>
>> And how could those terrorist make a wing fade out and in durng flight
>> when that doesn't happen with real jets?
>>
>
>     Since it didn't happen with either jet that attacked the twin
> towers, your question remains as stupid as it ever has.
>
>> And how could those living terrorist fly right into the Twin Towers
>> with no slowdown whatsoever?
>
>     Real easy. They flew in at the speed the craft was flying.
>     DUH!
>
>>
>> All the 9/11 perpetraitores needed to pull off their stunt was a 3D
>> layout of Nuke York City, some software and Crisis Actors.  Duh.
>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor
>
>     And yet, there is ZERO evidence that this happened.
>     Odd that.
>
>>
>>>> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to
>>>> look at the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told
>>>> what you saw. <G>
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>
>>> go watch the films, I did not see any "float away" shit, I did not see
>>> either jet slow down.
>>
>> The jets should have slowed down on impact but they didn't because
>> they were simply CGIs.  And they used Crisis Actors to make you
>> believe otherwize. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor
>>
>
>     You've yet to present any evidence of CGI.
>
>> And there are numerous photos of the Twin Towers floating away because
>> they floated away for a good month and maybe much longer.
>>
>
>     This LIE of yours has been exposed numerous times. What is at the
> root of your continuing to present this same lie?
>     Serious question.
>
>> Fact is anybody who fell for the official 9/11 bullshit has been
>> bamboozled.
>
>     You mean the troofers are all morons.
>
>>
>> And once more a building collapse does not explain why so much
>> survived at the very bottom of the Twin Towers but nukes placed under
>> WTC3 and WTC4 do. And the nuke under WTC3 also explains why WCBS
>> recorded EMPs.
>
>     Not so, as you already know. If only your mind were capable of
> admitting the truth of the matter.


https://kendoc911.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/911-meme.jpg 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511046

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:40:34 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
wrote:

>On 8/3/2015 8:52 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>>
>>>
>>>  From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>>
>> So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away
>
>Watch the films of it, the floors were caught on fire by the kerosene 
>fuel they use, the heat weaken the steal and the floors came crashing down.
>
>there was no "float away" shit.
>

     To Rocky, the truth is irrelevant.
     Drywall and concrete were turned to dust. Some of that dust did
float away. In Rocky's mind, this means the steel was turned to dust
and floated away.

>and
>> jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>
>terrorists took over and were driving the plane dumbass.
>

     Actually piloting the planes.
     Yes, I am being pedantic. Thanks for noticing :)

     The problem is that Rocky isn't a smart man The matter has been
explained to him a few times, but he is honestly unable to understand.

>> All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look at
>> the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw.
>> <G>
>>
>> Rocky
>
>go watch the films, I did not see any "float away" shit, I did not see 
>either jet slow down.

     But in Rocky's mind, the collapsing buildings were floating away.
While some powered debris did float away, it was not even close to
what Rocky claims.
     Rocky's claim is that the jets should have slowed down upon
hitting the towers. But at the speed they were going, the exterior
steel wasn't the resistance he claims they were. 

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511044

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:52:53 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:mpnoas$ad2$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/3/2015 7:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>>> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 Truth bullshit.
>>
>>
>> From your lips to god's ear, Rocko
>
>So you are saying jet fuel can make two 110 story buildings float away and 
>jets should not slow down when confronted by an immovable object?
>

     I see no such claim from HVAC.

>All anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax was to look at 
>the evidence for themselves instead of letting you be told what you saw. 
><G>

     But you look at evidence and claim the opposite of what is true.
A great example, but not the only one available, is your claim that
Windows 8.1 Pro is a bottom of the barrel OS.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511051 — dusty

the most tragic thing about the WTC, which I read
in the NYTimes, was that the asbestos-scare had just begun,
when they were buliding the first tower, and
it was therefore not built with rrth's best refractant,
asbestos.

what was used, was some sort of mica composite ... I forget ...
on the primary structural beams

>      But you look at evidence and claim the opposite of what is true.
> A great example, but not the only one available, is your claim that
> Windows 8.1 Pro is a bottom of the barrel OS.
> 
> -- 
> Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510987

On 08/03/2015 07:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mpncvv$1nt$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>       And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
>>>> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
>>>>       Odd that.
>>>
>>>
>>> The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3 sides are
>>> proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
>>>
>>> The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it
>>> should
>>> have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the front of a tank
>>> is
>>> proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI and the people that
>>> claimed
>>> to have seen it were merely Crisis Actors.
>>
>>
>> So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was simply
>> CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into the WTCs were
>> merely actors.
>>
>> And they expect to be taken seriously?
>
> Again in case you missed it.  The only person that could ever recreate the
> disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 did it with 3D software and you
> should see all the different reasons given why a wing disappeared by people
> that could not recreate that abnormality.
>
> Fact is the 3D image that we saw on TV was programmed to reflect the sky and
> that is what made the wing disappear.  And Crisis Actors are paid to make
> you believe in lies.  Duh.  Besides there were a few no-planers right at
> Ground Zero.  See:
>
> 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw
>
> and
>
> 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0
>
> Again, both the jets and both the buildings are inconsistent with the
> official story because the jets never slowed down when faced with steel
> twice as thick as that on the front of a tank and 110 story buildings don't
> just float away unless there was an underground nuke placed below them but
> not directly below them as proven by the "Surviving Corners" and the
> Survivors.  Plus only an underground nuke explains the EMPs recorded by
> WCBS.
>
> Here we have a video that proves the North Tower shook 12 seconds before it
> was vaporized:
>
> 9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret.
>   Visible shaking 12 seconds before collapse
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA
>
> And below we have a video by WCBS that shows an EMP 12 seconds before the
> North Tower was vaporized.  Can you figure out what the similarity is?  <G>
>
> BTW others have seen an EMP in this video as proven by the comments at:
> WTC1 collapse, WCBS Dub4 23.avi
>   http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s
>
> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 bullshit.
>
> Rocky

Give it up Rocky. Harlow is an official shill whose job is to pretend to 
be a moron and then call everyone who won't blindly believe his lies 
kooks! It's a job. It's propaganda. It's security cover-up of crimes. 
Why would you trust your money or life with a paid criminal? Same goes 
for HVAC. You can't win. It's like talking back to you your TV. They get 
to lie to all the gullible rubes out there and you get to talk to nobody.

Just remember HVAC says governments never lie. You can trust what he says.

And HVAC believes in Ghosts and Astrology too. Harlow only ACTS like an 
idiot, his sidekicks, though actually ARE idiots.





-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511023

On 8/3/2015 1:27 PM, benj wrote:
>
> Give it up Rocky. Harlow is an official shill whose job is to pretend to
> be a moron and then call everyone who won't blindly believe his lies
> kooks! It's a job. It's propaganda. It's security cover-up of crimes.
> Why would you trust your money or life with a paid criminal? Same goes
> for HVAC. You can't win. It's like talking back to you your TV. They get
> to lie to all the gullible rubes out there and you get to talk to nobody.
>
> Just remember HVAC says governments never lie. You can trust what he says.
>
> And HVAC believes in Ghosts and Astrology too. Harlow only ACTS like an
> idiot, his sidekicks, though actually ARE idiots.


Thanks?


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510992

On 08/03/2015 07:48 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mpncvv$1nt$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>       And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
>>>> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
>>>>       Odd that.
>>>
>>>
>>> The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3 sides are
>>> proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
>>>
>>> The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it
>>> should
>>> have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the front of a tank
>>> is
>>> proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI and the people that
>>> claimed
>>> to have seen it were merely Crisis Actors.
>>
>>
>> So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was simply
>> CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into the WTCs were
>> merely actors.
>>
>> And they expect to be taken seriously?
>
> Again in case you missed it.  The only person that could ever recreate the
> disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 did it with 3D software and you
> should see all the different reasons given why a wing disappeared by people
> that could not recreate that abnormality.
>
> Fact is the 3D image that we saw on TV was programmed to reflect the sky and
> that is what made the wing disappear.  And Crisis Actors are paid to make
> you believe in lies.  Duh.  Besides there were a few no-planers right at
> Ground Zero.  See:
>
> 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw
>
> and
>
> 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0
>
> Again, both the jets and both the buildings are inconsistent with the
> official story because the jets never slowed down when faced with steel
> twice as thick as that on the front of a tank and 110 story buildings don't
> just float away unless there was an underground nuke placed below them but
> not directly below them as proven by the "Surviving Corners" and the
> Survivors.  Plus only an underground nuke explains the EMPs recorded by
> WCBS.
>
> Here we have a video that proves the North Tower shook 12 seconds before it
> was vaporized:
>
> 9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret.
>   Visible shaking 12 seconds before collapse
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA
>
> And below we have a video by WCBS that shows an EMP 12 seconds before the
> North Tower was vaporized.  Can you figure out what the similarity is?  <G>
>
> BTW others have seen an EMP in this video as proven by the comments at:
> WTC1 collapse, WCBS Dub4 23.avi
>   http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s
>
> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
> inconsistencies with the official 9/11 bullshit.
>
> Rocky
>
>
Actually Rocko, all you have to be is a dishonest liar.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511043

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:mpncvv$1nt$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>      And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
>>>> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
>>>>      Odd that.
>>>
>>> The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3 sides are
>>> proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
>>>
>>> The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it 
>>> should have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the front of a tank 
>>> is proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI and the people that 
>>> claimed to have seen it were merely Crisis Actors.
>>
>> So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was simply 
>> CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into the WTCs were 
>> merely actors.
>>
>> And they expect to be taken seriously?
>
>Again in case you missed it.  The only person that could ever recreate the 
>disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 did it with 3D software and you 
>should see all the different reasons given why a wing disappeared by people 
>that could not recreate that abnormality.
>

     That it didn't disappear, as I have already proved, is the one
you hate the most.

>Fact is the 3D image that we saw on TV was programmed to reflect the sky and 
>that is what made the wing disappear.  

    I eagerly await your evidence of this.
    Oh wait. I've requested your evidence for this claim MANY times.
And, as of the time I write this, you've offered none.

>And Crisis Actors are paid to make 
>you believe in lies.  Duh.  Besides there were a few no-planers right at 
>Ground Zero.  See:
>
>9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw
>

     Nothing interesting about it.

>and
>
>911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0
>

     One person out of thousands. 

>Again, both the jets and both the buildings are inconsistent with the 
>official story because the jets never slowed down when faced with steel 
>twice as thick as that on the front of a tank and 110 story buildings don't 
>just float away unless there was an underground nuke placed below them but 
>not directly below them as proven by the "Surviving Corners" and the 
>Survivors.  

     Your run-on sentences are difficult to read.

>Plus only an underground nuke explains the EMPs recorded by 
>WCBS.

     Are you going to claim, again, that only nukes can cause EMPs?

>
>Here we have a video that proves the North Tower shook 12 seconds before it 
>was vaporized:
>
>9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret.
> Visible shaking 12 seconds before collapse
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA
>

     And?

>And below we have a video by WCBS that shows an EMP 12 seconds before the 
>North Tower was vaporized.  Can you figure out what the similarity is?  <G>

     Both occurred at the same time. 
     The rational mind will see it as an interesting coincidence, but
nothing more.

>
>BTW others have seen an EMP in this video as proven by the comments at:
>WTC1 collapse, WCBS Dub4 23.avi
> http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s
>

     One can't SEE an EMP. Despite what Hollywood movies would have
you believe.

>And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the 
>inconsistencies 

     I'm still waiting for your list of these inconsistencies and the
evidence you have that proves the claim.

>with the official 9/11 bullshit.

     As of the time I write this, you've been unable to counter
anything found within the report. And not for a lack of being asked
to.
     But we shouldn't expect so much from you. You're the simpleton
who proudly proclaimed Windows 8.1 Pro to be a bottom of the barrel
OS, so you're clearly not a very smart man.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#511188

K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mpncvv$1nt$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>      And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
>>>>> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
>>>>>      Odd that.
>>>>
>>>> The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3
>>>> sides are proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
>>>>
>>>> The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it
>>>> should have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the
>>>> front of a tank is proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI
>>>> and the people that claimed to have seen it were merely Crisis
>>>> Actors.
>>>
>>> So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was
>>> simply CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into
>>> the WTCs were merely actors.
>>>
>>> And they expect to be taken seriously?
>>
>> Again in case you missed it.  The only person that could ever recreate
>> the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 did it with 3D
>> software and you should see all the different reasons given why a wing
>> disappeared by people that could not recreate that abnormality.
>>
>
>     That it didn't disappear, as I have already proved, is the one
> you hate the most.
>
>> Fact is the 3D image that we saw on TV was programmed to reflect the
>> sky and that is what made the wing disappear.
>
>    I eagerly await your evidence of this.
>    Oh wait. I've requested your evidence for this claim MANY times.
> And, as of the time I write this, you've offered none.
>
>> And Crisis Actors are paid to make
>> you believe in lies.  Duh.  Besides there were a few no-planers right
>> at Ground Zero.  See:
>>
>> 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw
>>
>
>     Nothing interesting about it.
>
>> and
>>
>> 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0
>>
>
>     One person out of thousands.
>
>> Again, both the jets and both the buildings are inconsistent with the
>> official story because the jets never slowed down when faced with steel
>> twice as thick as that on the front of a tank and 110 story buildings
>> don't just float away unless there was an underground nuke placed
>> below them but not directly below them as proven by the "Surviving
>> Corners" and the Survivors.
>
>     Your run-on sentences are difficult to read.
>
>> Plus only an underground nuke explains the EMPs recorded by
>> WCBS.
>
>     Are you going to claim, again, that only nukes can cause EMPs?
>
>>
>> Here we have a video that proves the North Tower shook 12 seconds
>> before it was vaporized:
>>
>> 9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret.
>> Visible shaking 12 seconds before collapse
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA
>>
>
>     And?
>
>> And below we have a video by WCBS that shows an EMP 12 seconds before
>> the North Tower was vaporized.  Can you figure out what the similarity
>> is?  <G>
>
>     Both occurred at the same time.
>     The rational mind will see it as an interesting coincidence, but
> nothing more.
>
>>
>> BTW others have seen an EMP in this video as proven by the comments at:
>> WTC1 collapse, WCBS Dub4 23.avi
>> http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s
>>
>
>     One can't SEE an EMP. Despite what Hollywood movies would have
> you believe.
>
>> And one more time.  You have to be a complete idiot to miss all the
>> inconsistencies
>
>     I'm still waiting for your list of these inconsistencies and the
> evidence you have that proves the claim.
>
>> with the official 9/11 bullshit.
>
>     As of the time I write this, you've been unable to counter
> anything found within the report. And not for a lack of being asked
> to.
>     But we shouldn't expect so much from you. You're the simpleton
> who proudly proclaimed Windows 8.1 Pro to be a bottom of the barrel
> OS, so you're clearly not a very smart man.



https://kendoc911.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/911-meme.jpg 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#510975

On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 2:42:58 AM UTC-7, HVAC wrote:
> On 8/2/2015 2:04 PM, Rocky wrote:
> >
> >>      And yet, after almost 15 years, there is no valid, verifiable
> >> evidence to support, let alone prove, this claim.
> >>      Odd that.
> >
> >
> > The fact building collapses do not leave surviving corners on 3 sides are
> > proof that the Twin Towers were not a building collapse.
> >
> > The fact that the alleged Flight 175 never slowed down even when it should
> > have been faced with steel twice as thick as that on the front of a tank is
> > proof that the alleged Flight 175 was just a CGI and the people that claimed
> > to have seen it were merely Crisis Actors.
> 
> 
> So here is the stance of kooks like BJ, Blast and Rocko. 9/11 was simply 
> CGI and the people who 'witnessed' the planes crashing into the WTCs 
> were merely actors.
> 
> And they expect to be taken seriously?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
> HAIL HYDRA!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

Its A GOPer theory,and that means its a form of cover up.Bush did nothing,but fuck up.  Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web