Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #509836 > unrolled thread

'Dark Matter'

Started byjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
First post2015-07-27 07:28 -0700
Last post2015-08-19 09:12 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 122 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 07:28 -0700
    'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 18:16 -0700
      Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 07:17 -0400
      Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 15:18 -0700
        Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-29 02:22 +0000
      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-10 21:18 +0200
        Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:51 -0700
          Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 15:58 -0500
            Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-11 01:04 +0200
              Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:49 -0500
                Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:26 -0700
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 08:31 -0500
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 09:41 -0400
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:51 -0700
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 13:44 -0400
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 11:00 -0700
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-11 18:44 +0000
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 08:51 -0500
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:17 -0700
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 10:45 -0500
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 09:50 -0700
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 10:01 -0700
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 08:10 -0700
                Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 13:44 +0200
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:51 -0500
        Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-10 21:28 +0000
          Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 14:35 -0700
            Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-10 23:31 +0000
              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 15:22 +0200
                Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 14:43 +0000
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 19:39 +0200
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 18:06 +0000
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 20:23 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 19:37 +0000
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 00:39 +0200
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 15:38 +0200
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:25 +0200
                                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:15 +0200
                                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:31 +0200
                                    Re: 'Dark Matter' R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-08-16 16:09 +0000
                                      Re: 'Dark Matter' [OT] Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:47 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:38 +0200
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 11:09 +0200
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:40 +0200
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:17 +0200
                                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 16:46 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:42 +0200
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 11:21 +0200
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 +0200
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:19 +0200
                                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 16:49 +0200
                      light is magneto-electrical noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 19:10 -0700
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 13:49 -0500
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 20:50 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:03 -0500
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 00:43 +0200
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 17:53 -0700
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 09:34 +0200
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:05 -0400
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:36 +0200
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:00 +0200
                                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 16:22 +0200
                                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:30 +0200
                                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 16:56 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:17 +0200
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 11:26 +0200
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 13:01 +0200
                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:14 +0200
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 10:43 +0200
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 13:07 +0200
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:21 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:07 +0200
          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-11 01:03 +0200
            Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-10 23:40 +0000
              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 13:41 +0200
                Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 14:54 +0000
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 08:13 -0700
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:46 -0500
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 09:48 -0700
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:00 -0700
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 13:45 -0500
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 16:01 +0000
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:07 -0400
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:39 -0700
                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 20:29 +0200
                    Re: 'Dark Matter' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 19:14 +0000
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-13 19:28 +0000
                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-15 15:38 +0200
                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:23 +0200
                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:04 +0200
                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 16:32 +0200
                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 16:33 +0200
                                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:02 +0200
                                  Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 19:24 +0200
                                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:31 +0200
                                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 22:16 +0200
                                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 22:38 +0200
                                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:45 +0200
                                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 22:32 +0200
                                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 22:57 +0200
                                          Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 23:22 +0200
                                            Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 23:34 +0200
                                              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 23:38 +0200
                                                Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:43 +0200
                                                  Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 08:07 -0700
                                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 21:40 +0200
                                    Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 22:35 +0200
                                      Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-16 23:36 +0200
                                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 23:50 +0200
                                        Re: 'Dark Matter' Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 07:56 +0200
            Re: 'Dark Matter' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:48 -0500
              Re: 'Dark Matter' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-13 13:41 +0200
    Re: 'Dark Matter' "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:27 -0700
    Re: 'Dark Matter' "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 14:42 -0700
    Re: 'Dark Matter' "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 14:01 -0700
      Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 20:21 -0700
      Re: 'Dark Matter' benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 01:26 -0400
        Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:07 -0400
          Re: 'Dark Matter' Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:05 -0500
          Re: 'Dark Matter' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:04 -0700
            Re: 'Dark Matter' HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 19:14 -0400
    Re: 'Dark Matter' "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:12 -0700

Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →


#509836 — 'Dark Matter'

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-27 07:28 -0700
Subject'Dark Matter'
Message-ID<bc8f51f6-28d1-44d6-8f08-283dd834ffb3@googlegroups.com>
Dark matter is simply the next fractal
layer below us (size-wise)in the galaxy/atom
iteration. Each of its atoms are 10^-40m.
We cannot see them, but they do
have gravitational effects. As do the
layers below. Galaxies are atoms.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/BenzeneE.GIF

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#509954

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-27 18:16 -0700
Message-ID<ea207c5c-a3cb-4fcd-833d-3c3d3bbf8fdc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#509836
So.
Dark matter is just like our matter, but
31 orders of magnitude smaller.
We can't see it.
But we can feel it gravitationally.
It, however, does not feel us gravitationally 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509996

FromHVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-28 07:17 -0400
Message-ID<mp7o99$gr8$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#509954
On 7/27/2015 9:16 PM, john wrote:
> So.
> Dark matter is just like our matter, but
> 31 orders of magnitude smaller.
> We can't see it.
> But we can feel it gravitationally.
> It, however, does not feel us gravitationally


Utter and complete rubbish from John the child molester


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#510105

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-28 15:18 -0700
Message-ID<2f76fb02-f23f-4bf2-b6d1-0034340e9ce7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#509954
Whether or not the photon hits me, the
sun is the same.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#510141

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-07-29 02:22 +0000
Message-ID<mp9dcc$oof$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#510105
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Whether or not the photon hits me, the
>sun is the same.

No, the sun isn't quite the same.  The sun lost a little mass-energy by
emitting the photon (E=hf).  Your eyeball gained that energy by absorbing
it.  The sun recoiled slightly by emitting the photon (p=hf/c).  You were
thrown ever so slightly backwards by the photon's momentum when your
eyeball absorbed it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512491

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2015-08-10 21:18 +0200
Message-ID<1457970.BsSg34WjJe@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#509954
Odd Bodkin wrote:

> […] When that photon left the sun, the sun also recoiled a little in the
> opposite direction.

Your other ideas aside: What about the other photons?

 
PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512508

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-10 13:51 -0700
Message-ID<cc8e30bb-6bf7-4ba0-bc7d-b0ad94f93fdb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#512491
Yes, Odd.
Perhaps there ARE other photons!!
(What ideas? Odd regurgitates- things
like "swarming gravitons" and
hoaxing an autopsy with joints from
the butcher and strawberry jam. He
has no critical thinking skills. But
he reads!!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512513

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-10 15:58 -0500
Message-ID<mqb3ab$1me$3@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#512508
On 8/10/2015 3:51 PM, john wrote:
> Yes, Odd.
> Perhaps there ARE other photons!!

And so calculate the measurable implications of that.

> (What ideas? Odd regurgitates- things
> like "swarming gravitons" and
> hoaxing an autopsy with joints from
> the butcher and strawberry jam. He
> has no critical thinking skills. But
> he reads!!)
>

Well, I think that if your critical thinking skills tell you that an 
admitted hoaxster was not perpetrating a hoax at all, and that he was 
lying about lying, then your critical thinking skills need a little oil 
in the hinges, if you know what I mean.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512577

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2015-08-11 01:04 +0200
Message-ID<7347205.sNjYYejx7u@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#512513
Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 8/10/2015 3:51 PM, john wrote:
>> Yes, Odd.
>> Perhaps there ARE other photons!!
> 
> And so calculate the measurable implications of that.

Which would be?


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512655

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 07:49 -0500
Message-ID<mqcr0a$1c4$4@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#512577
On 8/10/2015 6:04 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
>> On 8/10/2015 3:51 PM, john wrote:
>>> Yes, Odd.
>>> Perhaps there ARE other photons!!
>>
>> And so calculate the measurable implications of that.
>
> Which would be?

It's his sub-photon idea. Let him calculate it.

>
>
> PointedEars
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512668

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 06:26 -0700
Message-ID<a7d262d0-b19c-4943-9b42-8ffe288ba0f2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#512655
Yes, Odd.
It IS my sub-photon idea.

The next fractal layer- the sub-atoms
making up electrons- is 10^31 times
smaller in diameter. Therefore each
volume is the square of that. Sub-photons
will each carry 1/10^62 as much energy
as regular ones. But there will be
10^62 times more of them, so they
carry just as much energy in total.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512670

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 08:31 -0500
Message-ID<46CdnStAY_GrZFTInZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#512668
On 8/11/15 8:26 AM, john wrote:
> It IS my sub-photon idea.

   Flush! So much for that idea without an inkling of scientific
   support.




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512676

FromHVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 09:41 -0400
Message-ID<mqctv9$r5d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#512668
On 8/11/2015 9:26 AM, john wrote:
> Yes, Odd.
> It IS my sub-photon idea.
>
> The next fractal layer- the sub-atoms
> making up electrons- is 10^31 times
> smaller in diameter. Therefore each
> volume is the square of that. Sub-photons
> will each carry 1/10^62 as much energy
> as regular ones. But there will be
> 10^62 times more of them, so they
> carry just as much energy in total.
>


This is John's 'Sub-Photon Theory'.

To anyone who is worried that when Bert dies we will have no more crazy 
shit to laugh at, I submit that John is waiting in the wings and will 
carry on once Bert has gone up to heaven.

-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512679

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 06:51 -0700
Message-ID<cfff9031-9b86-4671-8936-cccddb2f4ac1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#512676
Actually, HVAC, it's part of my "universal
fractal" theory.
You believe in a "everything was small
and dense and exploded" theory. 
I see a lot of fractal around, but not
too many small, dense things
spontaneously exploding. So.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512744

FromHVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 13:44 -0400
Message-ID<mqdc6u$mgo$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#512679
On 8/11/2015 9:51 AM, john wrote:
> Actually, HVAC, it's part of my "universal
> fractal" theory.
> You believe in a "everything was small
> and dense and exploded" theory.
> I see a lot of fractal around, but not
> too many small, dense things
> spontaneously exploding. So.
>

There is no evidence for any explosion. However, there IS evidence for 
an inflation of our universe. Google up what the difference is.

-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512758

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 11:00 -0700
Message-ID<218dd2ed-edec-47df-a09f-8e37665c52d1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#512744
Sam!
Here's the post saying jets form new stars.
I have capitalized the part that EXACTLY
echoes what I said here several years ago.


$Hubble finds evidence of galaxy star birth $regulated by black-hole fountain 
$> http://phys.org/news/2015-08-thickets-stars-$elliptical-galaxies.html 


$> Astronomers have uncovered a unique $process for how the universe's 
$> largest elliptical galaxies continue making $stars long after their 
$> peak years of star birth. NASA's Hubble &Space Telescope's exquisite 
$> high resolution and ultraviolet-light sensitivity &allowed the 
@> astronomers to see brilliant knots of hot, blue &stars forming along 
$> the jets of active black holes found in the &centers of giant 
@> elliptical galaxies. 

&> Combining Hubble data with observations &from a suite of ground-based 
$> and space telescopes, two independentteams &found that that THE BLACK
&> HOLE, JETS AND NEWBORN STARS ARE ALL PARTS OF A SELF-REGULATING
$> CYCLE. High-energy jets shooting from the $black hole heat a halo of 
> surrounding gas, controlling the rate at which the gas cools and 
> falls into the galaxy. 

> "Think of the gas surrounding a galaxy as an atmosphere," explained 
> the lead of the first study, Megan Donahue of Michigan State 
> University. "That atmosphere can contain material in different 
> states, just like our own atmosphere has gas, clouds, and rain. What 
> we are seeing is a process like a thunderstorm. As the jets propel 
> gas outward from the center of the galaxy, some of that gas cools and 
> precipitates into cold clumps that fall back toward the galaxy's 
> center like raindrops." 

> "The 'raindrops' eventually cool enough to become star-forming clouds 
> of cold molecular gas, and the unique far ultraviolet capabilities of 
> Hubble allowed us to directly observe these 'showers' of star 
> formation," explained the lead of the second study, Grant Tremblay of 
> Yale University. "We know that these showers are linked to the jets 
> because they're found in filaments and tendrils that wrap around the 
> jets or hug the edges of giant bubbles that the jets have inflated," 
> said Tremblay, "And they end up making a swirling 'puddle' of 
> star-forming gas around the central black hole." 

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated 
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics 
community, and physics-related social issues. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512775

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-08-11 18:44 +0000
Message-ID<mqdfqp$1i7$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#512758
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Sam!
>Here's the post saying jets form new stars.
>I have capitalized the part that EXACTLY
>echoes what I said here several years ago.

Of course it doesn't say new stars form from the jets like you claim.
It states the jets cause a cloud of gas to form new stars.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512680

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 08:51 -0500
Message-ID<46CdnSFAY_FjYFTInZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#512676
On 8/11/15 8:41 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 8/11/2015 9:26 AM, john wrote:
>> Yes, Odd.
>> It IS my sub-photon idea.
>>
>> The next fractal layer- the sub-atoms
>> making up electrons- is 10^31 times
>> smaller in diameter. Therefore each
>> volume is the square of that. Sub-photons
>> will each carry 1/10^62 as much energy
>> as regular ones. But there will be
>> 10^62 times more of them, so they
>> carry just as much energy in total.
>>
>
>
> This is John's 'Sub-Photon Theory'.
>
> To anyone who is worried that when Bert dies we will have no more crazy
> shit to laugh at, I submit that John is waiting in the wings and will
> carry on once Bert has gone up to heaven.
>

   John is a generation younger than Herbert Glazier. John is registered
   at crank dot net. He doesn't even try to sort life. He just pokes fun
   at physics because he doesn't understand any of it.

   It's a pity that sci.physics is infested with crackpots and trolls. No
   wonder it's hard for the likes of John to make any progress.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512688

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 07:17 -0700
Message-ID<c7ad0395-5623-420d-b21e-5b5cfa530c26@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#512680
Sam
Remember when HVAC posted his
QPO and I said that stars fall into the
center, jets form, and the material
blows out to make new stars?
They have just observed that!!

Why don't you look back, find where
I said that, and say, "Good prediction, John!"?

I'll tell you why not. Because you're 
invested. You're zombie-ized.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#512717

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-11 10:45 -0500
Message-ID<8vudnWuxI64phVfInZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#512688
On 8/11/15 9:17 AM, john wrote:
> Sam
> Remember when HVAC posted his
> QPO and I said that stars fall into the
> center, jets form, and the material
> blows out to make new stars?
> They have just observed that!!
>

   I can't find one observation that shows stars forming from the
   material in jets. Not one.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web