Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #506278 > unrolled thread

Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.

Started byHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
First post2015-07-11 22:15 +1000
Last post2015-07-12 09:21 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 133 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-11 22:15 +1000
    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-11 08:09 -0500
      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 10:52 -0400
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-12 09:20 -0500
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 12:01 -0400
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-13 15:38 -0500
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-13 15:56 -0500
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 06:53 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-14 08:58 -0500
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-15 12:32 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 14:41 -0400
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 09:08 -0400
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 11:51 -0400
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 13:32 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-15 12:30 -0500
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 14:24 -0400
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-16 13:40 -0500
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 05:15 -0400
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-17 05:28 -0700
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-17 08:46 -0500
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 10:42 -0400
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:31 -0400
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-17 19:48 +0000
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:29 -0500
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:28 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:27 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-18 04:07 -0400
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Rockinghorse Winner <rhorse@sonic.net> - 2015-07-18 16:43 -0700
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-18 18:58 -0500
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-18 17:32 -0700
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-19 05:42 -0400
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 07:09 -0400
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Rockinghorse Winner <rhorse@sonic.net> - 2015-07-19 22:20 -0700
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-20 00:40 -0700
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-20 05:06 -0500
                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-20 04:57 -0700
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-20 09:48 -0500
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-20 05:05 -0500
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:40 -0400
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-17 05:36 -0400
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:27 -0500
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-18 04:10 -0400
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:09 -0500
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-20 05:07 -0400
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 13:55 -0500
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:22 -0500
                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:05 -0500
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-21 12:36 -0500
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-22 05:14 -0400
                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:13 -0500
                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-23 05:37 -0400
                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:45 -0500
                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:14 +0000
                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:51 -0500
                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:56 +0000
                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:45 -0500
                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:29 -0400
                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:52 -0500
                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-25 05:38 -0400
                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:55 -0500
                                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:33 -0400
                                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:45 -0500
                                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 03:58 -0400
                                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:04 -0500
                                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:45 -0400
                                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:20 -0500
                                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 03:57 -0400
                                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:20 -0500
                                                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 03:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:40 -0500
                                                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:17 -0400
                                                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:59 -0500
                                                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 08:51 -0400
                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 17:15 -0500
                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:30 -0400
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-21 05:21 -0400
                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:06 -0500
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:49 +0000
                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:17 -0500
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-22 05:15 -0400
                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:18 -0500
                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-23 05:38 -0400
                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:47 -0500
                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 16:30 -0400
                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:54 -0500
                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-25 05:39 -0400
                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:56 -0500
                                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:34 -0400
                                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:47 -0500
                                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:05 -0700
                                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:05 -0500
                                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 03:59 -0400
                                    Re: @duke's "God" is a dream he had, long ago. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 15:27 -0500
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:24 -0500
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-20 05:11 -0400
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 13:56 -0500
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:45 +0000
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:52 -0500
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-21 05:22 -0400
                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:07 -0500
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-22 05:16 -0400
                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:18 -0500
                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-23 05:41 -0400
                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:48 -0500
                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 16:31 -0400
                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:54 -0500
                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-25 05:40 -0400
                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:57 -0500
                                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:35 -0400
                                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:48 -0500
                                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:01 -0400
                                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:06 -0500
                                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:45 -0400
                                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:21 -0500
                                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 03:57 -0400
                                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 03:54 -0400
                                                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:42 -0500
                                                                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:18 -0400
                                                                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 10:00 -0500
                                                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:24 -0400
                                                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:37 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:56 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:21 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 18:21 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 11:46 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:22 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 08:54 -0400
                                                                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:21 -0500
                                                                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 08:52 -0400
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-18 21:01 +0000
      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-12 22:51 +1000
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-12 09:21 -0500

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →


#508679

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-22 10:18 -0500
Message-ID<c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com>
In reply to#508631
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 05:15:49 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:06:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><1vusqah0mkfse8m4o449ifaelru6v1uqvc@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:21:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:55:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><8ugqqap70bb010lbffrci8o13sqfa533u7@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:07:37 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:09:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>><ta8nqa58jdmg81f5njp40ropo7tfof6513@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>>>>>>isn't evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>
>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>
>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>
>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>
>No pretending is necessary.

Then why do you do it?

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508865

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-23 05:38 -0400
Message-ID<qfd1ratrq6u06kn4iem97skcinm489d7bj@4ax.com>
In reply to#508679
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>>
>>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>>
>>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>>
>>No pretending is necessary.
>
>Then why do you do it?

No pretending is necessary.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508902

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-23 11:47 -0500
Message-ID<gi62raddng99f09ss3hnounkuhqhel0bgh@4ax.com>
In reply to#508865
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:38:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>>>
>>>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>>>
>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>
>>Then why do you do it?
>
>No pretending is necessary.

Ok, I have the evidence, all the evidence.  If you can reveal something,
anything that supports there being no God, let me know.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509226

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-24 16:30 -0400
Message-ID<h085ra154dl3jr36brc21ph3h9vrnge364@4ax.com>
In reply to#508902
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:47:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<gi62raddng99f09ss3hnounkuhqhel0bgh@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:38:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>>>>
>>>>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>>>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>>>>
>>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>>
>>>Then why do you do it?
>>
>>No pretending is necessary.
>
>Ok, I have the evidence, all the evidence.

Again you lie.

>  If you can reveal something,
>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.

Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.

Another indication that you lie.



--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509239

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-24 16:54 -0500
Message-ID<ttc5ra5j0fc47us3he8dk1qgvc6cbms00j@4ax.com>
In reply to#509226
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:30:38 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:47:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><gi62raddng99f09ss3hnounkuhqhel0bgh@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:38:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>>>>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>>>>>
>>>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>>>
>>>>Then why do you do it?
>>>
>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>
>>Ok, I have the evidence, all the evidence.
>
>Again you lie.

No, really.  You can't interact with God because you refuse to.

>>  If you can reveal something,
>>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.

>Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
>you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.

It's goes hand in hand with my advising you that I have all the evidence.

>Another indication that you lie.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509327

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-25 05:39 -0400
Message-ID<i9m6ra9bgbvclm7thmg1u5deqruk399rln@4ax.com>
In reply to#509239
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:54:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<ttc5ra5j0fc47us3he8dk1qgvc6cbms00j@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:30:38 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:47:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><gi62raddng99f09ss3hnounkuhqhel0bgh@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:38:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>><c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>>>>>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then why do you do it?
>>>>
>>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>>
>>>Ok, I have the evidence, all the evidence.
>>
>>Again you lie.
>
>No, really.  You can't interact with God because you refuse to.

There is nothing to interact with.

>
>>>  If you can reveal something,
>>>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.
>
>>Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
>>you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.
>
>It's goes hand in hand with my advising you that I have all the evidence.

Liar.

>
>>Another indication that you lie.
>

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509369

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-25 11:56 -0500
Message-ID<dsf7ra1o173lof75iklittg52prffrs5ap@4ax.com>
In reply to#509327
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 05:39:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:54:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><ttc5ra5j0fc47us3he8dk1qgvc6cbms00j@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:30:38 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:47:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><gi62raddng99f09ss3hnounkuhqhel0bgh@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:38:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:18:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>><c0dvqa97kqotvncroa5n1m8s0m0dkdn06s@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And you have nothing which you have reflected for years.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Just exactly where have I claimed I had anything?  Just what is it I
>>>>>>>>>>>am supposed to have?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Evidence for there being NO God.  The contrary evidence stands in your way.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I have never claimed to have any evidence of any kind.  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As I told monkey boy, we have the evidence, so you can't say there is no
>>>>>>>>evidence.  All you can do is pretend to not see it. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then why do you do it?
>>>>>
>>>>>No pretending is necessary.
>>>>
>>>>Ok, I have the evidence, all the evidence.
>>>
>>>Again you lie.
>>
>>No, really.  You can't interact with God because you refuse to.
>
>There is nothing to interact with.

I do.  I have a conversation with God every day.

>>>>  If you can reveal something,
>>>>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.
>>
>>>Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
>>>you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.

>>It's goes hand in hand with my advising you that I have all the evidence.
>Liar.

Your problem, not mine.  I win, you lose.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509541

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-26 03:34 -0400
Message-ID<ga39rateaf7b64ie5qla1nf3p4tfnjrjei@4ax.com>
In reply to#509369
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:56:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<dsf7ra1o173lof75iklittg52prffrs5ap@4ax.com> wrote:

>>>No, really.  You can't interact with God because you refuse to.
>>
>>There is nothing to interact with.
>
>I do.  I have a conversation with God every day.

You are delusional.

>
>>>>>  If you can reveal something,
>>>>>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.
>>>
>>>>Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
>>>>you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.
>
>>>It's goes hand in hand with my advising you that I have all the evidence.
>>Liar.
>
>Your problem, not mine.  I win, you lose.

Was this a contest of some kind?

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509640

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-26 12:47 -0500
Message-ID<u67ara9ogkkt41an1crrl11vhj6ir4fpa4@4ax.com>
In reply to#509541
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 03:34:18 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:56:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><dsf7ra1o173lof75iklittg52prffrs5ap@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>>>No, really.  You can't interact with God because you refuse to.
>>>
>>>There is nothing to interact with.
>>
>>I do.  I have a conversation with God every day.
>
>You are delusional.

You're left out due to your own choice.

>>>>>>  If you can reveal something,
>>>>>>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.
>>>>
>>>>>Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
>>>>>you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.
>>
>>>>It's goes hand in hand with my advising you that I have all the evidence.
>>>Liar.
>>
>>Your problem, not mine.  I win, you lose.
>
>Was this a contest of some kind?

In a way it is.  You choose to listen to satan.  I choose to listen to God.  You
don't stand a chance of a fart in a hurricane.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509653

Fromtalishi <talishi@example.net>
Date2015-07-26 11:05 -0700
Message-ID<mp37gl21vbq@news7.newsguy.com>
In reply to#509640
On 07/26/2015 10:47 AM, duke wrote:
> In a way it is.  You choose to listen to satan.  I choose to listen to God.  You
> don't stand a chance of a fart in a hurricane.

Whereas you're more like a fart in an elevator.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#510068

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-28 16:05 -0500
Message-ID<rirfra9lffkl33j632uapfdp3fdpb6hvt3@4ax.com>
In reply to#509653
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:05:46 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:

>On 07/26/2015 10:47 AM, duke wrote:
>> In a way it is.  You choose to listen to satan.  I choose to listen to God.  You
>> don't stand a chance of a fart in a hurricane.
>
>Whereas you're more like a fart in an elevator.

You've experienced it?  Were you the only one in there?

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#509816

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-27 03:59 -0400
Message-ID<25pbra5t8294g5r3etugl74qv4ie5lme85@4ax.com>
In reply to#509640
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:47:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<u67ara9ogkkt41an1crrl11vhj6ir4fpa4@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 03:34:18 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:56:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><dsf7ra1o173lof75iklittg52prffrs5ap@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>No, really.  You can't interact with God because you refuse to.
>>>>
>>>>There is nothing to interact with.
>>>
>>>I do.  I have a conversation with God every day.
>>
>>You are delusional.
>
>You're left out due to your own choice.

I am left out of nothing except your delusion.

>
>>>>>>>  If you can reveal something,
>>>>>>>anything that supports there being no God, let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Where have I made such a claim?  You keep asking me the same thing let
>>>>>>you never indicate where I have hade such a claim.
>>>
>>>>>It's goes hand in hand with my advising you that I have all the evidence.
>>>>Liar.
>>>
>>>Your problem, not mine.  I win, you lose.
>>
>>Was this a contest of some kind?
>
>In a way it is.  You choose to listen to satan.  I choose to listen to God.  You
>don't stand a chance of a fart in a hurricane.
>

Nope.  I have never heard any 'satan'.  Why am I not surprised?

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508551 — Re: @duke's "God" is a dream he had, long ago.

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-21 15:27 -0500
SubjectRe: @duke's "God" is a dream he had, long ago.
Message-ID<loatqa5kpie2qfht3707p2glslr14v4nfj@4ax.com>
In reply to#508453
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:12:21 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>  
>@duke's "God" is a dream he had, long ago. 
>  @duke's "God" is a dream he had, long ago. 

Somebody call the guys in the white coats.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508091

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-19 17:24 -0500
Message-ID<4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com>
In reply to#507819
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>
>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>
>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.

>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>isn't evidence.

That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for there being
NO God.  I have ALL the evidence available and it certifies the existence of
God.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508182

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-20 05:11 -0400
Message-ID<3jepqah170a3aobnfjs8u7936qvo3s7mag@4ax.com>
In reply to#508091
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:24:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>
>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>
>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>
>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>isn't evidence.
>
>That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for there being
>NO God. 

Correct.  However, I have never claimed there is no god.  I have
stated that due to the lack of supporting evidence for the existence
of any god I take the default position of there being no god.

> I have ALL the evidence available and it certifies the existence of
>God.
>

So you constantly claim, but to date it is an unsubstantiated claim.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508297

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-20 13:56 -0500
Message-ID<e1hqqatvhp3krqmi33p2gerallkrb1p296@4ax.com>
In reply to#508182
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:11:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:24:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>>
>>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>>
>>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>>
>>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>>isn't evidence.
>>
>>That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for there being
>>NO God. 
>
>Correct.  However, I have never claimed there is no god.  I have
>stated that due to the lack of supporting evidence for the existence
>of any god I take the default position of there being no god.

The evidence for the existence of God stands in your way

>> I have ALL the evidence available and it certifies the existence of
>>God.
>>
>
>So you constantly claim, but to date it is an unsubstantiated claim.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508323

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2015-07-20 19:45 +0000
Message-ID<mojj4t$ql3$4@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#508297
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:56:19 -0500, duke wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:11:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:24:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id <4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>>>
>>>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>>>
>>>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>>>isn't evidence.
>>>
>>>That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for
>>>there being NO God.
>>
>>Correct.  However, I have never claimed there is no god.  I have stated
>>that due to the lack of supporting evidence for the existence of any god
>>I take the default position of there being no god.
> 
> The evidence for the existence of God stands in your way

What evidence? You have NEVER presented any.
Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.

>>> I have ALL the evidence available and it certifies the existence of
>>>God.
>>>
>>>
>>So you constantly claim, but to date it is an unsubstantiated claim.

At this late stage, it becomes a lie.

> *****
> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508370

Frombilgat@m.nu
Date2015-07-20 17:52 -0500
Message-ID<bruqqa5tu01u621macqoffq8ulnp1acrke@4ax.com>
In reply to#508297
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:56:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:11:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:24:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>>>
>>>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>>>
>>>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>>>isn't evidence.
>>>
>>>That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for there being
>>>NO God. 
>>
>>Correct.  However, I have never claimed there is no god.  I have
>>stated that due to the lack of supporting evidence for the existence
>>of any god I take the default position of there being no god.
>
>The evidence for the existence of God stands in your way
>

LOL where is it? You have yet to provide anything at all except large
amounts of blubber....


>>> I have ALL the evidence available and it certifies the existence of
>>>God.
>>>
>>
>>So you constantly claim, but to date it is an unsubstantiated claim.
>
>the dukester, American-American
>
>*****
>"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
>Pope Paul VI
>*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508454

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2015-07-21 05:22 -0400
Message-ID<2p3sqa5jungp5q4r3848u025dkqd4r2d93@4ax.com>
In reply to#508297
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:56:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<e1hqqatvhp3krqmi33p2gerallkrb1p296@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:11:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:24:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>>>
>>>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>>>
>>>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>>>isn't evidence.
>>>
>>>That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for there being
>>>NO God. 
>>
>>Correct.  However, I have never claimed there is no god.  I have
>>stated that due to the lack of supporting evidence for the existence
>>of any god I take the default position of there being no god.
>
>The evidence for the existence of God stands in your way

I have yet to see any such evidence.

>
>>> I have ALL the evidence available and it certifies the existence of
>>>God.
>>>
>>
>>So you constantly claim, but to date it is an unsubstantiated claim.
>

And once again you fail to respond.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#508509

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-07-21 12:07 -0500
Message-ID<o1vsqahmbtu7mt004ga35b4ru2i9msnjmo@4ax.com>
In reply to#508454
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:26 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:56:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><e1hqqatvhp3krqmi33p2gerallkrb1p296@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:11:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:24:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><4d8oqahtat9noceur0od69pitt5eu85mpf@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:10:23 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:27:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>><6a0jqah14ch4qh3v043ge2nuncc1atu4mb@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thank God for his presence amongst us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But of course you can't prove any such presence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Got lock solid control of all the evidence.
>>>>
>>>>>Which you have claimed for years, but anyone can claim anything.  That
>>>>>isn't evidence.
>>>>
>>>>That's just it.  You can't provide the tiniest bit of evidence for there being
>>>>NO God. 
>>>
>>>Correct.  However, I have never claimed there is no god.  I have
>>>stated that due to the lack of supporting evidence for the existence
>>>of any god I take the default position of there being no god.
>>
>>The evidence for the existence of God stands in your way
>
>I have yet to see any such evidence.

I know.  You refuse to look at what we have.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web