Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591608 > unrolled thread

How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 22:53 -0700
    Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 16:10 -0700
    Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-02 19:05 -0500
      stupid idiots like Republican Party on climate change and Sergio Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 14:10 -0700
        Re: stupid idiots like Republican Party on climate change and Sergio Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 18:30 -0500
        like a) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:39 -0700
    Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 18:26 -0700
      Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-04 15:39 -0500
      robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 10:01 -0700
        Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:10 -0700
          McGinnes b00k of meteor records -- l00k out noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 15:46 -0700
            Re: McGinnes b00k of meteor records -- l00k out James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:31 -0700
              McGinnes b00k of meteor records -- l00k out, THERE noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 11:14 -0700
        Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 10:46 -0700
          Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:22 -0700
          Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like  Sergio, McGinn The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-12 13:30 -0700
            Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:53 -0400
              Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 21:29 +0000
    faking a Dr. degree as poster Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 12:50 -0700
      hogs de la that & this noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 18:12 -0700

#591608 — How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Just report them under Google Abuse Report. It blocks there thread from appearing and groups them together so as to not clutter up the front page. I just spent 4 minutes knocking out the 28 threads of Sergio and McGinn.

I consider it no chore on me to spend 5 minutes each day making sci.physics readable for me. Sort of like spending time to unwrap something you bought in the store.

So do yourself the favor-- just report abuse of hogs and then you will not see that thread again. Just 5 minutes a day is not much to ask to make sci.physics nice.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#591699

Sergio was posting some weird stuff, even if it wasn't as weird as yours

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591706

On 8/2/2016 12:53 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Just report them under Google Abuse Report. It blocks there thread
> from appearing and groups them together so as to not clutter up the
> front page. I just spent 4 minutes knocking out the 28 threads of
> Sergio and McGinn.
>
> I consider it no chore on me to spend 5 minutes each day making
> sci.physics readable for me. Sort of like spending time to unwrap
> something you bought in the store.
>
> So do yourself the favor-- just report abuse of hogs and then you
> will not see that thread again. Just 5 minutes a day is not much to
> ask to make sci.physics nice.
>
> AP
>


I did google search for "hottest year" with the "year" being a variable, AND

for the last 16 years, EACH year has been the hottest or second hottest
reported in that year.

My point is that the fear mongering Climate change peoples have been
consistently delivering the HOTerist message each year for the past 16
years.




anyhow, AP, it is easier to get another newsreader, and another 
newsserver, you can plonk who you like right off the bat, never see 
their smily face.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591773 — stupid idiots like Republican Party on climate change and Sergio

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 7:05:54 PM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:

> 
> 
> I did google search for "hottest year" with the "year" being a variable, AND
> 
> for the last 16 years, EACH year has been the hottest or second hottest
> reported in that year.
> 
> My point is that the fear mongering Climate change peoples have been
> consistently delivering the HOTerist message each year for the past 16
> years.
> 
> 

And my point is that if you are antiscience, why bother posting to sci.physics. Your school or college should make annul your degree since you cannot think straight or clear.

Anyone who denies that Humanity changes the climate, is so stupid that they also deny that Humanity changes the habitat across the world. To Sergio, the animals of Africa such as rhinos and lions and elephants are increasing, not going extinct, just the same as stupid Sergio thinking that Humanity does not affect climate.

The Republican Party is antiscience, and is a party headed for extinction since it is AntiScience. Republican Party cannot even accept science, as they go their own way to destroying environment just so some Republican can make a dollar while they destroy the environment.

The Republican Party was on a march of going extinct starting with Reagan, who, was a fine president in dealing with foreign issues but was the worst USA president when dealing with anything other than foreign policy to Russia. Reagan was the start of the Republican Party being a AntiScience party. Remember how fast Reagan pulled down the Solar Panels when in office.

Reagan like Trump, like Sergio hates science and they hate Global Warming because they have little small minds, and they would say that that world's rhinos, lions, elephants, birds, bees, whales, trees, all are doing fine and that Humanity is not causing them to lose habitat, nor are they in decline.

Same way, these stupid idiots say that Humanity is not the cause of increasing Earth temperature.

No wonder Republicans have elected an insane person, a meglamaniac, a demagogue, a narcissitic idiot to lead their party. The Republican Party is going extinct and it should go extinct whenever a party hates Science. 

Science is the best truth that Humanity has, will ever have. And when a political party stands time and time again, against Science, the days of that Party existing is numbered.

In the throes of a death-of-a-party, history teaches us that in the throes, where death is imminent of a party, that the Party displays ugly horrible choices, where it nominates the most unfit person to represent the party, and we see it in Trump and the senate leader McConnel (spelling). The death throes of a political party is where they display horrible judgement and ugly ideas.

Reagan overall is one of the worst presidents the USA ever had. His only accomplishment was to get Russia to change, which is a big accomplishment. But back at home, in the USA, Reagan set up a market capital system which collapsed in 2008 as the Second Depression and made the Republican Party be the AntiScience party. The reason Trump got in, is because, the Republican Party no longer stands for any truth in the world, the Republican Party stands for only everyone having guns and the rich get richer.

> 
> 
> anyhow, AP, it is easier to get another newsreader, and another 
> newsserver, you can plonk who you like right off the bat, never see 
> their smily face.

So, stupid Sergio, who believes Global Warming is not real and believes Humanity cannot affect Climate and believes the lions, rhinos, elephants are not affected by Humanity just as Humanity cannot affect Climate.

You do not belong in sci.physics, Sergio, you belong in alt.head up arse newsgroup.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591794 — Re: stupid idiots like Republican Party on climate change and Sergio

On 8/3/2016 4:10 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 7:05:54 PM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I did google search for "hottest year" with the "year" being a
>> variable, AND
>>
>> for the last 16 years, EACH year has been the hottest or second
>> hottest reported in that year.
>>
>> My point is that the fear mongering Climate change peoples have
>> been consistently delivering the HOTerist message each year for the
>> past 16 years.
>>
>>

> So, stupid Sergio, who believes Global Warming is not real and
> believes Humanity cannot affect Climate and believes the lions,
> rhinos, elephants are not affected by Humanity just as Humanity
> cannot affect Climate.
>

>
> AP
>

so AP, you a Burnie dude, or a Hillaryite ?

and what is this about your lions, rhinos and elephants ?  They need 
24/7 protection, food and water like in a Zoo.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591966 — like a)

it is a simple matter of trigonometry, that
there is no warmal globing per se; or,
it is just a matter of how the climate changes,
given all of these factors, like a)
deforestation

> So, stupid Sergio, who believes Global Warming is not real and believes Humanity cannot affect Climate and believes the lions, rhinos, elephants are not affected by Humanity just as Humanity cannot affect Climate.
> 
> You do not belong in sci.physics, Sergio, you belong in alt.head up arse newsgroup.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591806

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 12:53:36 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Just report them under Google Abuse Report. It blocks there thread from appearing and groups them together so as to not clutter up the front page. I just spent 4 minutes knocking out the 28 threads of Sergio and McGinn.
> 
> I consider it no chore on me to spend 5 minutes each day making sci.physics readable for me. Sort of like spending time to unwrap something you bought in the store.
> 
> So do yourself the favor-- just report abuse of hogs and then you will not see that thread again. Just 5 minutes a day is not much to ask to make sci.physics nice.
> 
> AP

Took 2 minutes today to knock out 7 McGinn spam hogging the front page.

Use Google abuse reports to make sci.physics better for you and maybe, just maybe these hogs will be reprimanded and penalized by Google.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591912

On 8/3/2016 8:26 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 12:53:36 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium
> wrote:
>> Just report them under Google Abuse Report. It blocks there thread
>> from appearing and groups them together so as to not clutter up the
>> front page. I just spent 4 minutes knocking out the 28 threads of
>> Sergio and McGinn.
>>
>> I consider it no chore on me to spend 5 minutes each day making
>> sci.physics readable for me. Sort of like spending time to unwrap
>> something you bought in the store.

>> So do yourself the favor-- just report abuse of hogs and then you
>> will not see that thread again. Just 5 minutes a day is not much to
>> ask to make sci.physics nice.
>>
>> AP
>
> Took 2 minutes today to knock out 7 McGinn spam hogging the front
> page.
>
> Use Google abuse reports to make sci.physics better for you and
> maybe, just maybe these hogs will be reprimanded and penalized by
> Google.
>
> AP
>


no need for all that, just send me $4.99 to makemerich@paypal.com and 
that will fix the problem

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592080 — robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Took me all of 2.5 minutes today to report McGinn under a fake name of solving tornadoes to Google abuse. And a few others. Now the newsgroup sci.physics is mostly a calm sea of blue-- saying -- hidden for reported abuse.

So, 2 to 5 minutes per day is not much of a price to pay to make sci.physics a normal newsgroup without the spam clutter. I also report as abuse the robots, for they teach or learn nothing. Robots in a science newsgroup is bad, because it is a disservice to the science involved. It is a selfish act of posts where the manhandlers are selfishly trying to see what their robot does, and wasting the time of those truly involved with the science at hand.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592081 — Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 
> Took me all of 2.5 minutes today to report McGinn under a fake name of solving tornadoes to Google abuse. And a few others. Now the newsgroup sci.physics is mostly a calm sea of blue-- saying -- hidden for reported abuse.
> 
> So, 2 to 5 minutes per day is not much of a price to pay to make sci.physics a normal newsgroup without the spam clutter. I also report as abuse the robots, for they teach or learn nothing. Robots in a science newsgroup is bad, because it is a disservice to the science involved. It is a selfish act of posts where the manhandlers are selfishly trying to see what their robot does, and wasting the time of those truly involved with the science at hand.
> 
> AP


welcome to the world of robot science.

should robots pay social security tax?

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592422 — McGinnes b00k of meteor records -- l00k out

iff I can get into a home for old bots, that is c00l

> should robots pay social security tax?
> 
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592634 — Re: McGinnes b00k of meteor records -- l00k out

On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 3:46:39 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote:
> iff I can get into a home for old bots, that is c00l
> 
> > should robots pay social security tax?
> > 
> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

Ever notice that when my name is in the subject the post gets a lot more views?

It would have even more if we could remove Sergio's name.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592673 — McGinnes b00k of meteor records -- l00k out, THERE

thou hast ne'er seen the business end of a hygrometer,
amongst other things that you didn't, couldn't, or really wouldn't, d00

> It would have even more if we could remove Sergio's name.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592934 — Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Took me 4 minutes to knock out a batch of McGinn, front page hog, block of posts. When you use Google abuse report, it turns the McGinn nonsense into "post is hidden along with 14 more" and collects all the posts into one line and hides from view, clearing up sci.physics.

Spending 5 minutes a day is not too much to ask to read sci.physics.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592944 — Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

thanks, g00d job

> Spending 5 minutes a day is not too much to ask to read sci.physics.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592961 — Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 
> Took me 4 minutes to knock out a batch of McGinn, front page hog, block of posts. 
> When you use Google abuse report, it turns the McGinn nonsense into "post is hidden along with 14 more" and 
> collects all the posts into one line and hides from view, clearing up sci.physics.
> 
> Spending 5 minutes a day is not too much to ask to read sci.physics.
> 
> AP

You do know that someone is going to spend 10 minutes a day knocking you
out, do you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592964 — Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

On 8/12/2016 4:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>
>> Took me 4 minutes to knock out a batch of McGinn, front page hog, block of posts.
>> When you use Google abuse report, it turns the McGinn nonsense into "post is hidden along with 14 more" and
>> collects all the posts into one line and hides from view, clearing up sci.physics.
>>
>> Spending 5 minutes a day is not too much to ask to read sci.physics.
>>
>> AP
>
> You do know that someone is going to spend 10 minutes a day knocking you
> out, do you?

Archie is experienced. He's LONG been on everyones "abuse" list.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592969 — Re: robots in sci.physics Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 8/12/2016 4:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>
>>> Took me 4 minutes to knock out a batch of McGinn, front page hog, block of posts.
>>> When you use Google abuse report, it turns the McGinn nonsense into "post is hidden along with 14 more" and
>>> collects all the posts into one line and hides from view, clearing up sci.physics.
>>>
>>> Spending 5 minutes a day is not too much to ask to read sci.physics.
>>>
>>> AP
>>
>> You do know that someone is going to spend 10 minutes a day knocking you
>> out, do you?
> 
> Archie is experienced. He's LONG been on everyones "abuse" list.
 
"Archie-Poo is a chronic abusive trolling idiot.
I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean
rock-hard stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface
of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric
acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid
so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole
different sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid.
Meta-stupid. Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its
own Schwarzschild radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense
and massive that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid.
Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise
emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can
be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial
fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of
stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of
physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo
is Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid,
a grand unified theory of stupid.
Archie-Poo is the epiphany of stupid. Archie-poo is stooopid."

Uncle Al - circa 2009
 
" Archimedes Plutonium 2004 Jul 10 ILLUCID"

http://www.crank.net/usenet.html

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593049 — faking a Dr. degree as poster Re: How to handle front page hogs like Sergio, McGinn

Took me 5 minutes today to knock out the front page hog McGinn of about 10 posts. It took longer than usual because the hog used a fake name.

I do not mind 5 minutes per day, and you should try it, to clean up what you see and read in sci.physics. It is easier on the nerves when "this post is hidden and 13 others due to abuse".

Is McGinn the Donald Trump of sci.physics? I do not know, for I do not know if McGinn is anti global warming. 

But Jai Maharaj spelling? is anti global warming and surely a Donald Trump of sci.physics.

On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 3:39:10 PM UTC-5, hari///.kumar wrote: 
> Jay stevens posting as "dr. jai etc." has zero understanding of what this 
> is about. 
> 

What I despise of JM is not the fake name, for thousands of posters are faksters of name, but I do despise the idea of faking that you have a science degree and call yourself "Dr." That really disturbs me, and I move that Dr. J.M. be banned from sci.physics. Even the physics idiots of Odd and Moroney have that common decency of not faking their credentials, even though they lack the decency to just observe sci.physics and not pollute sci.physics with their stupidity.


AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593085 — hogs de la that & this

I think he said that he was, but
it is a simple matter of planar trig on an equinox,
to show that warmal globing is a nonsequiter
from glassal housing ('896, by Svente ahrreniuS

> if McGinn is anti global warming. 
> 
> But Jai Maharaj spelling? is anti global warming and surely a Donald Trump of sci.physics.
> 
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 3:39:10 PM UTC-5, hari///.kumar wrote: 
> > Jay stevens posting as "dr. jai etc." has zero understanding of what this 
> > is about. 
> > 
> 
> What I despise of JM is not the fake name, for thousands of posters are faksters of name, but I do despise the idea of faking that you have a science degree and call yourself "Dr." That really disturbs me, and I move that Dr. J.M. be banned from sci.physics. Even the physics idiots of Odd and Moroney have that common decency of not faking their credentials, even though they lack the decency to just observe sci.physics and not pollute sci.physics with their stupidity.
> 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web