Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703799 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-21 13:36 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 73 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:33 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 10:56 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:05 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:40 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:51 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:11 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:16 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:15 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:38 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 22:00 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 17:04 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 19:41 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:00 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:55 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:15 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:07 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:22 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:28 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:24 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:21 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:36 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:38 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 11:14 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:14 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 15:02 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:12 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 17:53 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 13:44 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 20:36 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 14:08 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:25 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:35 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:54 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:18 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:43 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 23:05 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:07 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:21 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 20:02 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:26 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:39 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:00 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 11:17 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:56 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-23 00:06 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:10 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-23 00:27 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:31 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:04 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:06 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:16 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:36 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:44 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:53 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:13 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:19 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:25 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:06 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:23 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 23:32 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:56 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:14 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:28 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 13:36 -0500
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 13:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kvvcqdlaq1ot7rvhhtchdma4cflj6h5kf8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704123 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 11:37:53 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >On 9/22/2018 7:07 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:17:43 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> He was replying to the idiot known as %. >> >> Wouldn't that be *blithering idiot*? > >What's the difference between a blithering idiot and the >ordinary garden variety idiot? The ordinary, garden variety idiot sits there contemplating his navel while the blithering idiot constantly mouths off in public just like PeeScent does. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361036368ab60110994b99@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #704123 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <R5vpD.77840$SN2.44916@fx38.iad>, JW@me.com says... > > On 9/22/2018 7:07 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:17:43 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> He was replying to the idiot known as %. > > > > Wouldn't that be *blithering idiot*? > > What's the difference between a blithering idiot and the > ordinary garden variety idiot? Blithering idiots are a subset of idiots in general. There's also another subspecies known as blathering idiots. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 17:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po6c62$1320$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704123 |
On 9/22/2018 1:37 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 9/22/2018 7:07 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:17:43 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> He was replying to the idiot known as %. >> >> Wouldn't that be *blithering idiot*? > > What's the difference between a blithering idiot and the > ordinary garden variety idiot? > The former "blithers". OK?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 11:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361028b7b76f2de3994b91@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #704090 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <3kfcqd9sm8t3865cjrdfn9mtt6dodabme4@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:17:43 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > <...> > > >He was replying to the idiot known as %. > > Wouldn't that be *blithering idiot*? I was trying not to sound too harsh. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <v0ig7f-66m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703971 |
In sci.physics Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>> >>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>> >>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>> rainfall over land? >>>> >>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >> >> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > > See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- > and do so with absurd lies. Unless % is you posting as someone else, I wasn't talking to you, idiot. <snip babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk0rrr.ul4.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703988 |
On 2018-09-21 6:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>> >>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>> >>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>> >>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >> >> See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- >> and do so with absurd lies. > > Unless % is you posting as someone else, I wasn't talking to you, idiot. > > <snip babble> > > i'm everybody here except you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mhmg7f-bkm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703991 |
In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-21 6:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>>> >>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>>> >>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>>> >>>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >>> >>> See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- >>> and do so with absurd lies. >> >> Unless % is you posting as someone else, I wasn't talking to you, idiot. >> >> <snip babble> >> >> > i'm everybody here except you Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 11:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvj0ha.6shqo387rmklN%invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #704017 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2018-09-21 6:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow > >>>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures > >>>>>>>>> evaporating the river: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger > >>>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> > >>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > >>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as > >>>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > >>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > >>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > >>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > >>>>>> rainfall over land? > >>>>>> > >>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > >>>> > >>>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > >>> > >>> See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- > >>> and do so with absurd lies. > >> > >> Unless % is you posting as someone else, I wasn't talking to you, idiot. > >> > >> <snip babble> > >> > >> > > i'm everybody here except you > > Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. Ïn Pembroke where we all live. -- Ï
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 07:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po586q$17at$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704067 |
On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > > Ïn Pembroke where we all live. You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 15:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjb1s.114rrun1opdaopN%invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #704070 |
Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > > > > Ïn Pembroke where we all live. > > You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. Ï had to look that up. -- Ï
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 11:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po5m5g$1se6$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704094 |
On 9/22/2018 10:02 AM, Ï wrote: > "kensi" declared: >> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. >>> >>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. >> >> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. > > Ï had to look that up. And now you have a workable diagnosis, Bog!e. May it inform your treatment options and contribute eventually to your return to health. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 17:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjij2.1mbfat0z0d9tqN%invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #704105 |
Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > On 9/22/2018 10:02 AM, Ï wrote: > > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > >> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: > >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > >>> > >>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. > >> > >> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. > > > > Ï had to look that up. > > And now you have a workable diagnosis, Bog!e. May it inform your > treatment options and contribute eventually to your return to health. How nice of you to be so solicitous of my wellbeing, Weird Paul. -- Ï
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 13:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po62il$jdb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704110 |
On 9/22/2018 11:53 AM, Ï wrote: > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: >> On 9/22/2018 10:02 AM, Ï wrote: >>> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor >>> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: >>>> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. >>>>> >>>>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. >>>> >>>> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. >>> >>> Ï had to look that up. >> >> And now you have a workable diagnosis, Bog!e. May it inform your >> treatment options and contribute eventually to your return to health. > > How nice of you to be so solicitous of my wellbeing, Weird Paul. > > does 'she' wear a dress when 'she' posts ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk2q2s.a89.17.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704094 |
On 2018-09-22 7:02 AM, Ï wrote: > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > >> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. >>> >>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. >> >> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. > > Ï had to look that up. > did you like what you found
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 20:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjqjd.cg1re0103r1omN%invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #704142 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-22 7:02 AM, Ï wrote: > > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > > > >> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: > >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > >>> > >>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. > >> > >> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. > > > > Ï had to look that up. > > > did you like what you found Ït was a bit confusing. -- Ï
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-23 10:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po88s8$1pii$11@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704147 |
On 9/22/2018 3:36 PM, Ï wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2018-09-22 7:02 AM, Ï wrote: >>> kensi declared: >>>> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. >>>>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. >>>> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. >>> Ï had to look that up. >> did you like what you found > Ït was a bit confusing. I don't see why it would be. It should seem really familiar; the description fits you to a T. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk2q1o.a89.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704067 |
On 2018-09-22 3:14 AM, Ï wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 6:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>>>>> >>>>>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >>>>> >>>>> See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- >>>>> and do so with absurd lies. >>>> >>>> Unless % is you posting as someone else, I wasn't talking to you, idiot. >>>> >>>> <snip babble> >>>> >>>> >>> i'm everybody here except you >> >> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > > Ïn Pembroke where we all live. > i'm still waiting to see a personality in order
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 14:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <6dcpD.65644$um3.8415@fx32.iad> |
| In reply to | #703888 |
On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>> >>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>> >>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>> >>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >> >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >> rainfall over land? >> > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not also include more landfall rain?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 20:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6m0g7f-m4k.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703899 |
In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>> >>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>> >>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>> >>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>> rainfall over land? >>> >> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor > from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater > humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more > ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not > also include more landfall rain? It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk0a7j.qi3.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703907 |
On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>> >>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>> >>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>> rainfall over land? >>>> >>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >> >> Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor >> from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater >> humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more >> ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not >> also include more landfall rain? > > It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > education is not important when it comes to rain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web