Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #535473 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-25 15:45 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-11-30 17:48 -0800 |
| Articles | 16 on this page of 76 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 15:45 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-25 23:50 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 18:13 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 00:21 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 18:34 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 00:52 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 20:27 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 03:08 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 08:21 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 20:16 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 15:33 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 23:38 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 17:54 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 01:47 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 20:08 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 02:43 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 20:47 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 03:04 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:50 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 18:57 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 15:29 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 23:13 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 17:55 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-27 19:18 -0500
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 00:34 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 00:24 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 18:32 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 02:35 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 21:41 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 06:14 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 13:58 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 20:45 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 15:06 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 23:03 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 17:22 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 23:34 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 17:50 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:18 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 20:15 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 15:34 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 23:37 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 17:55 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 01:47 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 20:09 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 02:43 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 20:48 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 03:03 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:51 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 18:57 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 15:30 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 23:13 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 17:56 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 00:24 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 18:33 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 02:34 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 21:42 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 06:14 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 13:59 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 20:45 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 15:06 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 23:02 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 17:22 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 23:34 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 17:51 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-29 04:46 +0000
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:19 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:03 -0800
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-25 21:41 -0500
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 21:26 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:00 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 21:32 -0500
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:50 -0800
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 09:06 -0600
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 09:36 -0800
Re: Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 01:12 -0800
air, bought to you buy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 17:48 -0800
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 23:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mdopic-5al.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #536149 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/28/15 2:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck you, spamming ass hole > > > Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your Fuck you, spamming ass hole -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 17:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <LJmdndNG2P2vqsfLnZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536191 |
On 11/28/15 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck you, spamming ass hole Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 23:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <49qpic-djl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #536208 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/28/15 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck you, spamming ass hole > > > Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your Fuck you, spamming ass hole -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 17:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <LJmdncZG2P13oMfLnZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536217 |
On 11/28/15 5:34 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Fuck you, spamming ass hole
Whiners and Name callers like the jimp, can greatly benefit from
these anger management classes.
> http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes
Life is good, no?
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 04:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4icqic-2cn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #536232 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/28/15 5:34 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck you, spamming ass hole > > > Whiners and Name callers like the jimp, can greatly benefit from Fuck off and die, spamming shit head. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 07:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XcSdnUfAkLjaZsfLnZ2dnUU7-QcAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #536295 |
On 11/28/15 10:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Fuck off and die, spamming shit head
Whiners and Name callers like the jimp, can greatly benefit from
these anger management classes.
> http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes
Life is good, no?
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 07:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <37aabd3b-5267-469a-a62b-1a36d5a55c06@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #536326 |
Why don't you children just go outside and play?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 21:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hcadnSw1udP77MvLnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #535473 |
On 25/11/2015 4:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/einstein-general-relativity-1.3334540 > > >> Albert Einstein finished presenting his ground-breaking theory to the >> scientific world at the Prussian Academy of Sciences exactly 100 >> years ago today. (Associated Press) >> > >> Here are some of the most amazing things that have come out of it so >> far. >> >> 1. Black holes >> >> 2. The Big Bang >> >> 3. GPS >> >> 4. Wormholes and warp speed >> >> 5. Gravitational lensing Well of those, only GPS has any practical everyday usage right now. The rest are great in science-fiction movies though, which might be considered a good everyday usage of the theory too. Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 21:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <3OmdnbkPNs1N5svLnZ2dnUU7-X-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #535547 |
On 11/25/15 8:41 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: > On 25/11/2015 4:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/einstein-general-relativity-1.3334540 >> >> >>> Albert Einstein finished presenting his ground-breaking theory to the >>> scientific world at the Prussian Academy of Sciences exactly 100 >>> years ago today. (Associated Press) >>> >> >>> Here are some of the most amazing things that have come out of it so >>> far. >>> >>> 1. Black holes >>> >>> 2. The Big Bang >>> >>> 3. GPS >>> >>> 4. Wormholes and warp speed >>> >>> 5. Gravitational lensing > > Well of those, only GPS has any practical everyday usage right now. The > rest are great in science-fiction movies though, which might be > considered a good everyday usage of the theory too. > > Yousuf Khan > I'll guess that wormholes will be next from this list. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 09:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n376qk$3qr$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #535473 |
On 11/25/2015 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought > >> Albert Einstein finished presenting his ground-breaking theory to the >> scientific world at the Prussian Academy of Sciences exactly 100 >> years ago today. (Associated Press) So Einstein tried to give it to the Russians first. >> > >> Here are some of the most amazing things that have come out of it so >> far. >> >> 1. Black holes when was this math developed ? 1976 ? >> >> 2. The Big Bang no, BB is simply a theory to explain the red shift. >> >> 3. GPS Wrong on all counts, GR only provides a fine correction >> >> 4. Wormholes and warp speed no such things, hollywood cartoons >> >> 5. Gravitational lensing they did not evolve from GR.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 21:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_pqdnbk-7aBaXcrLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #535608 |
On 26/11/2015 10:00 AM, gilber34 wrote: > On 11/25/2015 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Einstein's general theory of relativity at 100: 5 great things it brought > >> >>> Albert Einstein finished presenting his ground-breaking theory to the >>> scientific world at the Prussian Academy of Sciences exactly 100 >>> years ago today. (Associated Press) > > So Einstein tried to give it to the Russians first. Prussians, not Russians. Prussia is a region of Germany. Back in the early part of the 20th century, Prussia was still a thing. http://is.gd/EVgOqD >>> Here are some of the most amazing things that have come out of it so >>> far. >>> >>> 1. Black holes > > when was this math developed ? 1976 ? 1916, one year after the General Theory of Relativity was introduced, Karl Schwarzchild used the equations from GR to develop the theory of black holes. http://is.gd/Hj3whG >>> 2. The Big Bang > > no, BB is simply a theory to explain the red shift. Which explains a general movement away from each other, which leads to the conclusion that at one time these galaxies were all much closer together. >>> 3. GPS > > Wrong on all counts, GR only provides a fine correction Without it, the satellites would be off by 10km/day. That's not just a fine correction, that's a major correction. >>> 4. Wormholes and warp speed > > no such things, hollywood cartoons So far yes. Not everything from Relativity has full practical applications yet. >>> 5. Gravitational lensing > > they did not evolve from GR. They certainly did. Newtonian gravity certainly never predicted anything like this. Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 06:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ebca60fc-d587-4313-a211-0094fbc3c3a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #535813 |
Yousuf Khan wrote... >>> 5. Gravitational lensing > > they did not evolve from GR. >They certainly did. Newtonian gravity certainly never predicted anything like this. Optical refraction does. Why should Newtonian gravity have to explain optical refraction?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 09:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsednUFkNK317MXLnZ2dnUU7-N0AAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #535893 |
On 11/27/15 8:50 AM, jay moseley wrote: > Optical refraction does. Why should Newtonian gravity have to explain > optical refraction? There is no medium that "refraction" takes place in this case. This gravitational lensing only takes place near massive bodies with a chance alignment of a light source behind the lensing object. Background | Gravitational lens > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens > A gravitational lens refers to a distribution of matter (such as a > cluster of galaxies) between a distant source and an observer, that > is capable of bending the light from the source, as it travels > towards the observer. This effect is known as gravitational lensing > and the amount of bending is one of the predictions of Albert > Einstein's general theory of relativity.[1] (Classical physics also > predicts bending of light, but only half that of general > relativity's.[2]) > > Although Orest Chwolson (1924) or Frantisek Klin (1936) are sometimes > credited as being the first ones to discuss the effect in print, the > effect is more commonly associated with Einstein, who published a > more famous article on the subject in 1936. > > Fritz Zwicky posited in 1937 that the effect could allow galaxy > clusters to act as gravitational lenses. It was not until 1979 that > this effect was confirmed by observation of the so-called "Twin QSO" > SBS 0957+561. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 09:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <082fc0de-e809-4827-b934-313c610f1deb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #535895 |
Sam claimed " There is no medium that "refraction" takes place in this case. This gravitational lensing only takes place near massive bodies with a chance alignment of a light source behind the lensing object. " So- there is NO medium? In space? How did you prove that? By not finding any? What did that entail?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 01:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b381b29e-64f2-4805-8f0f-d8bef81de8dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #535927 |
On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 7:36:24 PM UTC+2, john wrote: > Sam claimed > " There is no medium that "refraction" takes place in this case. This > gravitational lensing only takes place near massive bodies with a > chance alignment of a light source behind the lensing object. " > > So- there is NO medium? In space? > How did you prove that? > By not finding any? > What did that entail? ================================== Sammi go better conduct your orchestra and stop damaging advance in science or else you are a criminal Y.Porat =================================== Y.P ==============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-30 17:48 -0800 |
| Subject | air, bought to you buy |
| Message-ID | <ac31c885-1873-4e8f-8d4d-03ced3305dbe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #535927 |
they are commonly known as atoms, a.k.a the medium of free space (which was orignally a term for a i r ; please to notice, how it is that lightwaves propogate in air e.g > " There is no medium that "refraction" takes place in this case. This > gravitational lensing only takes place near massive bodies with a > chance alignment of a light source behind the lensing object. " > > So- there is NO medium? In space? > How did you prove that? > By not finding any? > What did that entail?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web