Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516417 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:54 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:15 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:23 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:43 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:57 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:51 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
re, nah noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:39 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:53 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:55 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:52 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:50 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:21 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:46 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:46 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:24 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:55 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:22 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:11 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:35 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 17:10 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:13 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:02 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:32 -0500
say dUh; thankyoiu noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 21:09 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:30 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:28 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:28 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 20:23 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:29 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 21:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:02 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 11:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:06 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:05 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (iimp is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:49 -0500
Re: Rocky is still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:45 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 08:29 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: Rocky's latest delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 02:35 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:09 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 15:51 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:09 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:11 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:41 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 22:01 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:13 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:32 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:12 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:12 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:52 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:28 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:34 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:50 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:30 +0000
hah, may be not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:13 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 12:39 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:42 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:19 -0500
two noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:29 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-29 22:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:35 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 20:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:24 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-30 10:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:20 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 11:01 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:48 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:58 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:07 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:27 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:31 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:07 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 10:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:47 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:23 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:17 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:44 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:56 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m6a1bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517009 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> Not just scaled down but if you bury a nuke deep in rock it changes the >>> spread pattern and that was the trick used at Ground Zero. And here >>> is a short video that I just saw for the first time today. >> >> The deeper you bury a nuke, the greater the seismic signature, kook. >> >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic >> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. >> >> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any >> seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers >> as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected >> by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the >> Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. >> >> A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a >> fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. >> >> Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it >> has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. >> >> Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available >> on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. >> >> Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any >> governmental agency. >> >> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. >> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> > > > > Right. > Those are some credible websites you provided links to,...NOT > They don't even list an email address. > And I'll bet even if they did it would be a gmail address. > > Damn,....even the site they referrence is somethig homemade. You mean the various seismographic stations they reference, kook? Or maby this, kook: Kim, Won-Young, L. R. Sykes, J. H. Armitage, J. K. Xie, K. H. Jacob, P. G. Richards, M. West,F. Waldhauser, J. Armbruster, L. Seeber, W. X. Du and A. Lerner-Lam, Seismic waves generated by aircraft impacts and building collapses at World Trade Center, New York City, Eos,Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 82, No. 47, pages 565, 570-571, November 20, 2001. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrigro$stl$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516753 |
On 25/08/2015 15:40, Rocky wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:mrhrrt$4va$1@dont-email.me... >> >> >> gilber34 wrote: >>>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >>>>> counter ? >>>>> >>>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >>>> >>>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >>>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" >>>> and since >>>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> NO RADIATION >>> >>> >>>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence >>>> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies >>>> and >>>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do >>>> it >>>> again. >>> >>> NO RADIATION DETECTED >>> >>>> >>>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >>>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar >>>> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: >>> >>> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and >>> morons, >>> >>> >>> >>>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >>>> >>>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >>>> >>> >>> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION >>> DETECTED then or now. >> >> >> So WHO actually checked ? >> The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. >> >> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw >> it. >> >> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >> >> And like dynamite, that can take out a mountain side, or be scaled down to >> make firecrackers for kids. >> Nukes can be scaled down as well. > > Not just scaled down but if you bury a nuke deep in rock it changes the > spread pattern and that was the trick used at Ground Zero. And here is a > short video that I just saw for the first time today. > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y > > And then add to that the playlist I have proving that NIST lied about every > single fact they based their "hypothetical collapse initiation" on it is > becomes clear that NIST might have known the Twin Towers were nuked on > 9/11/01. > > Rocky sheeple > > And these 'magic nukes' left no radiation or seismic records, how quaint. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 22:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrjcbb$v1r$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516753 |
On 8/25/2015 9:40 AM, Rocky the lying Squerrelie wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > > Not just scaled down but if you bury a nuke deep in rock it changes the > spread pattern and that was the trick used at Ground Zero. but there was/is no depression at all, which is formed by all nukes underground, and there was/is no radiation at all. And here is a > short video that I just saw for the first time again today. > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=D7FNGWse4sjj_Y > > And then add to that the playlist I have proving that NIST lied about every > single fact they based their "hypothetical collapse initiation" on it is > becomes clear that NIST might have known the Twin Towers were nuked on > 9/11/10. > > Rocky No radiation dude. ask NIST what time it is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gsiuac-7ig.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516746 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying > there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 13:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mria80$1t7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516746 |
On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote: > > I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying > there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. -- "Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?" https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 13:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mriasu$g6u$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516823 |
On 8/25/2015 12:58 PM, HVAC wrote: > On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote: >> >> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. > > > A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does > this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear > bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. > > ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the > distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. > > Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. > > Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. > > People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial lie that the sky is blue. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <R4SdndFeHb0eeEHInZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516827 |
"Odd Bodkin" <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote in message news:mriasu$g6u$2@speranza.aioe.org... > On 8/25/2015 12:58 PM, HVAC wrote: >> On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote: >>> >>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >> >> >> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does >> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear >> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. >> >> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the >> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. >> >> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. >> >> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. >> >> > > People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial lie > that the sky is blue. And your excuse why the EPA, NIST, NNSA and the USGS were caught in so many inconsistencies is what? Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 22:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrjcfo$v1r$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516877 |
On 8/25/2015 4:59 PM, Rocky wrote: > "Odd Bodkin" <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does >>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear >>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. >>> >>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the >>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. >>> >>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. >>> >>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. >>> >>> >> >> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial lie >> that the sky is blue. > And my excuse why the EPA, NISTs, NASA and the USGS were caught in so many > inconsistencies is what? > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=D7FNGDDWsjj_Y > > Rocky dude, the sky is blue, really. you can stop.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 00:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <UebDx.8$tw.7@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #516827 |
On 08/25/2015 02:07 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/25/2015 12:58 PM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote:
>>>
>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying
>>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke.
>>
>>
>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does
>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear
>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings.
>>
>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the
>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation.
>>
>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded.
>>
>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro.
>>
>>
>
> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial
> lie that the sky is blue.
No question that governments NEVER lie to the people. I'm sure you and
HVAC will assure us of that one. They don't give drugs to unsuspecting
citizens, they don't pretend to treat diseases just to watch people die,
they don't spread bacteria around cities for fun, they never say
radiation is "good for you" or that the amount of radiation is "safe"
and they certainly never had sex with that woman.
And anyone who says other wise is an insane "conspiracy theory" kook who
need not be listened to.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 09:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrkg4d$1ub$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516946 |
On 8/26/2015 12:27 AM, benj wrote: > >>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >>>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >>> >>> >>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does >>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear >>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. >>> >>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the >>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. >>> >>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. >>> >>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. >>> >>> >> >> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial >> lie that the sky is blue. > > No question that governments NEVER lie to the people. I'm sure you and > HVAC will assure us of that one. They don't give drugs to unsuspecting > citizens, they don't pretend to treat diseases just to watch people die, > they don't spread bacteria around cities for fun, they never say > radiation is "good for you" or that the amount of radiation is "safe" > and they certainly never had sex with that woman. > > And anyone who says other wise is an insane "conspiracy theory" kook who > need not be listened to. You ARE a kook, BJ...But I will ALWAYS listen to you. You're a hoot! "I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke." -BJ -- "Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?" https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 09:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrkijr$mdr$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516994 |
On 8/26/2015 8:50 AM, HVAC wrote: > On 8/26/2015 12:27 AM, benj wrote: >> >>>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just >>>>> saying >>>>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >>>> >>>> >>>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does >>>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear >>>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. >>>> >>>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the >>>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. >>>> >>>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. >>>> >>>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial >>> lie that the sky is blue. >> >> No question that governments NEVER lie to the people. I'm sure you and >> HVAC will assure us of that one. They don't give drugs to unsuspecting >> citizens, they don't pretend to treat diseases just to watch people die, >> they don't spread bacteria around cities for fun, they never say >> radiation is "good for you" or that the amount of radiation is "safe" >> and they certainly never had sex with that woman. >> >> And anyone who says other wise is an insane "conspiracy theory" kook who >> need not be listened to. > > > You ARE a kook, BJ...But I will ALWAYS listen to you. You're a hoot! > Benj is apparently of the sort that says that if the government lies about something, then they should be taken to be lying about EVERYTHING. "But how do we KNOW which is the truth and which is a lie?" he wails. "Better to trust NO ONE, because NO ONE can be counted on to tell the truth all the time." And so he trusts only his own wits, which unfortunately are too weak to serve him well. Benj is discernment-challenged. > > "I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying > there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke." -BJ > > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrkm03$qf0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517001 |
On 8/26/2015 10:31 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> You ARE a kook, BJ...But I will ALWAYS listen to you. You're a hoot! >> > > Benj is apparently of the sort that says that if the government lies > about something, then they should be taken to be lying about EVERYTHING. > > "But how do we KNOW which is the truth and which is a lie?" he wails. > "Better to trust NO ONE, because NO ONE can be counted on to tell the > truth all the time." And so he trusts only his own wits, which > unfortunately are too weak to serve him well. > > Benj is discernment-challenged. It's amazing how kooky a true kook is once I have put them to the question. At first BJ appeared to be somewhat rational. That has now gone by the boards. He is a kook of the first water. It's a good thing he has me blocked and doesn't read my posts. This one would send him into a froth filled kook rant. He hates you too...Kooks just hate reality. -- "Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?" https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrkpst$8kj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517012 |
On 8/26/2015 10:31 AM, HVAC wrote: > On 8/26/2015 10:31 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >> Benj is apparently of the sort that says that if the government lies >> about something, then they should be taken to be lying about EVERYTHING. >> >> "But how do we KNOW which is the truth and which is a lie?" he wails. >> "Better to trust NO ONE, because NO ONE can be counted on to tell the >> truth all the time." And so he trusts only his own wits, which >> unfortunately are too weak to serve him well. >> >> Benj is discernment-challenged. > > > It's amazing how kooky a true kook is once I have put them to the > question. At first BJ appeared to be somewhat rational. That has now > gone by the boards. He is a kook of the first water. > > It's a good thing he has me blocked and doesn't read my posts. This one > would send him into a froth filled kook rant. > > He hates you too...Kooks just hate reality. > Benj has been a kook for as long as I've been posting here. He shows lots of symptoms that would normally prompt hospitalization, and I'm sure he's fighting tooth and nail to avoid that. People in state or private care often sound completely fine until they say something bat-shit crazy. I have him killfiled now and so don't see his responses except second-hand. I see that he doesn't have me killfiled even if he's killfiled you. So he sees responses by you only second-hand too. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 12:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <P6mDx.35545$yE.2224@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #517028 |
On 08/26/2015 12:35 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/26/2015 10:31 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 8/26/2015 10:31 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Benj is apparently of the sort that says that if the government lies
>>> about something, then they should be taken to be lying about EVERYTHING.
>>>
>>> "But how do we KNOW which is the truth and which is a lie?" he wails.
>>> "Better to trust NO ONE, because NO ONE can be counted on to tell the
>>> truth all the time." And so he trusts only his own wits, which
>>> unfortunately are too weak to serve him well.
>>>
>>> Benj is discernment-challenged.
>>
>>
>> It's amazing how kooky a true kook is once I have put them to the
>> question. At first BJ appeared to be somewhat rational. That has now
>> gone by the boards. He is a kook of the first water.
>>
>> It's a good thing he has me blocked and doesn't read my posts. This one
>> would send him into a froth filled kook rant.
>>
>> He hates you too...Kooks just hate reality.
>>
>
> Benj has been a kook for as long as I've been posting here. He shows
> lots of symptoms that would normally prompt hospitalization, and I'm
> sure he's fighting tooth and nail to avoid that. People in state or
> private care often sound completely fine until they say something
> bat-shit crazy.
>
> I have him killfiled now and so don't see his responses except
> second-hand. I see that he doesn't have me killfiled even if he's
> killfiled you. So he sees responses by you only second-hand too.
>
Oh look Muffy, the 6th graders are having a conversation! They are
reminding everyone that if they say someone is a "kook" then nothing the
"kook" say needs to be listened to.
OK, so governments and politicians may lie their asses off, but that's
no reason not to believe everything their spokesmen tell you to believe,
right? Hey, it's easy to tell when politicians and governments are
lying. Their lips are moving! That is called "discernment"!
It's really sad to see people who never got a proper education doing a
political job like calling whistle-blowers names. I think Herb Glazier
has a better education than either of these clowns.
Hey, Boinker, I'm still watching you! As for HVAC, I graduated from the
6th grade many years ago. He's just worthless skin.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 13:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <FnmDx.5942$125.3303@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #517001 |
On 08/26/2015 10:31 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/26/2015 8:50 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 8/26/2015 12:27 AM, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just
>>>>>> saying
>>>>>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does
>>>>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a
>>>>> nuclear
>>>>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings.
>>>>>
>>>>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the
>>>>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial
>>>> lie that the sky is blue.
>>>
>>> No question that governments NEVER lie to the people. I'm sure you and
>>> HVAC will assure us of that one. They don't give drugs to unsuspecting
>>> citizens, they don't pretend to treat diseases just to watch people die,
>>> they don't spread bacteria around cities for fun, they never say
>>> radiation is "good for you" or that the amount of radiation is "safe"
>>> and they certainly never had sex with that woman.
>>>
>>> And anyone who says other wise is an insane "conspiracy theory" kook who
>>> need not be listened to.
>>
>>
>> You ARE a kook, BJ...But I will ALWAYS listen to you. You're a hoot!
>>
>
> Benj is apparently of the sort that says that if the government lies
> about something, then they should be taken to be lying about EVERYTHING.
>
> "But how do we KNOW which is the truth and which is a lie?" he wails.
> "Better to trust NO ONE, because NO ONE can be counted on to tell the
> truth all the time." And so he trusts only his own wits, which
> unfortunately are too weak to serve him well.
>
> Benj is discernment-challenged.
>
>>
>> "I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying
>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke." -BJ
Discernment means there are certain people you can ALWAYS blindly trust.
You and HVAC being two of them. Right?
Look at how "trustworthy" that 6th grader HVAC is. Above he's taken a
quote from Rocko and is saying I posted it. I'm sure the idea is to try
to get some kind of "froth" out of me. You both have serious mental
problems. It must take a special kind of mental illness to work as a
disinformation troll.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 10:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dtGdnSkip9wySUDInZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516946 |
"benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote in message news:UebDx.8$tw.7@fx02.iad... > On 08/25/2015 02:07 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/25/2015 12:58 PM, HVAC wrote: >>> On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >>>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >>> >>> >>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does >>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear >>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. >>> >>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the >>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. >>> >>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. >>> >>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. >>> >>> >> >> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial >> lie that the sky is blue. > > No question that governments NEVER lie to the people. I'm sure you and > HVAC will assure us of that one. They don't give drugs to unsuspecting > citizens, they don't pretend to treat diseases just to watch people die, > they don't spread bacteria around cities for fun, they never say radiation > is "good for you" or that the amount of radiation is "safe" and they > certainly never had sex with that woman. And that they wouldn't lie about the air quality in Nuke York City either. Or they wouldn't give First Responders dosimeter badges to monitor radiation at ground zero and then tell them the badges were to monitor the air quality. If they were really monitoring air quality they would have been wearing gas mask themselves like a few people at GZ did. Or they wouldn't prepare large documents like NIST where everything they based their hypothetical Collapse Initiation on was a fabrication or extremely misleading. > And anyone who says other wise is an insane "conspiracy theory" kook who > need not be listened to. And I could go on and on about the bullshit I've seen come from our government so why should I believe them? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 13:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <NqmDx.216$wg.34@fx24.iad> |
| In reply to | #517008 |
On 08/26/2015 11:00 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote in message news:UebDx.8$tw.7@fx02.iad...
>> On 08/25/2015 02:07 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 8/25/2015 12:58 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying
>>>>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does
>>>> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear
>>>> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings.
>>>>
>>>> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the
>>>> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation.
>>>>
>>>> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded.
>>>>
>>>> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial
>>> lie that the sky is blue.
>>
>> No question that governments NEVER lie to the people. I'm sure you and
>> HVAC will assure us of that one. They don't give drugs to unsuspecting
>> citizens, they don't pretend to treat diseases just to watch people die,
>> they don't spread bacteria around cities for fun, they never say radiation
>> is "good for you" or that the amount of radiation is "safe" and they
>> certainly never had sex with that woman.
>
> And that they wouldn't lie about the air quality in Nuke York City either.
>
> Or they wouldn't give First Responders dosimeter badges to monitor radiation
> at ground zero and then tell them the badges were to monitor the air
> quality. If they were really monitoring air quality they would have been
> wearing gas mask themselves like a few people at GZ did.
>
> Or they wouldn't prepare large documents like NIST where everything they
> based their hypothetical Collapse Initiation on was a fabrication or
> extremely misleading.
>
>> And anyone who says other wise is an insane "conspiracy theory" kook who
>> need not be listened to.
>
> And I could go on and on about the bullshit I've seen come from our
> government so why should I believe them?
>
> Rocky
>
You should believe them without question, Rocko, because HVAC and
Boinker TOLD you to believe them. If you can't trust anonymous kook
trolls on the Internet, who can you trust? If you can't trust Big
Brother then you might as well just give up.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c8a1bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517008 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: <snip raving kook babble> Nothing left. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 09:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrkfum$198$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516827 |
On 8/25/2015 2:07 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/25/2015 12:58 PM, HVAC wrote: >> On 8/25/2015 9:52 AM, Bast wrote: >>> >>> I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying >>> there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. >> >> >> A nuclear bomb gives a distinctive reading on a seismograph. It does >> this no matter the size of the nuke. It's a result of the way a nuclear >> bomb is detonated. On 9/11 there were hundreds of seismic recordings. >> >> ALL captured the moment of impact and collapse. NONE showed the >> distinctive signature of a nuclear detonation. >> >> Any mention of a nuclear explosion that day is utterly retarded. >> >> Rocko is nothing but a troll. Don't encourage him bro. >> >> > > People like Rocko will tell you that it is a government conspiratorial > lie that the sky is blue. Rocko and Blast just need to educate themselves on the way a nuclear bomb is detonated. We use this distinctive seismic signature to monitor the earth for nuclear test ban violations. Of course today we have even more methods to detect, but the seismic signature remains a vital tool in monitoring this treaty. -- "Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?" https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrg17e$llc$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516447 |
On 24/08/2015 15:53, Rocky wrote: > "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message > news:mrfa2p$7s0$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> On 8/24/2015 9:15 AM, Rocky wrote: >>> "Poutnik" <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:mrf7ji$6ri$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 08/24/2015 03:38 PM, Rocky wrote: >>>> >>>>> "If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and >>>>> Nagasaki >>>>> recover so quickly?" >>>>> >> >>>> If you knew more about radioactive decay of fission products, >>>> you would not need to ask such a question. >> >>>> As Hiroshima and Nagasaki could recover so quickly, >>>> even if nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years. >>>> >>>> As the products vary very much in their half time, >>>> so activity drops fast initially, >>>> until short time product decay. >> >>>> Also, amount of fission material >>>> was about 4 orders lower than for nuclear plant. >>>> >>>> -- >> >>>> >>>> Knowledge makes great people humble, >>>> but small people arrogant. >> >>> FYI you hijacked this thread, but I forgive you because I can add to this >>> thread that the EPA also lied about the air quality at Nuke York City's >>> Ground Zero >>> >>> BTW in reality this thread was dealing with the fact that the US has lied >>> about radiation before so why shouldn't they lie about the radiation at >>> Nuke >>> York City's Ground Zero also? >> >> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >> counter ? >> >> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. > > You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the following > does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" and since DEWs > have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence of not > just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies and then the > fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do it again. > > Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and udder > bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar hypotheses > that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: > > The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > Still no answers about the radiation, then? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web