Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 232 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:08 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 15:53 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger now claims he actually won his suit. It was dismissed, meaning he lost) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger still doesn't understand the law) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Kid still doesn't understand the law at all ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Roger PROVES he still doesn't understand the law at all and that he FEARS offering an honest answer to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:45 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah the stalker proves she is clearly lying now ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:42 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:41 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 09:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:21 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile that can't prove she is smart "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:39 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:58 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) |
| Message-ID | <HMWdnYNPB9MXLnnInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518222 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:u7oebc-vo4.ln1@mail.specsol.com... <snip remaining delusional raving>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) |
| Message-ID | <8nqebc-115.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518225 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: Nothing. Have you ever wondered why your postings are laughed at, you can't hold a job, and your attempts at romance result in restraining orders? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT |
| Message-ID | <nb2dnaonRPPVXXnInZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518238 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:8nqebc-115.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > result in restraining orders? ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both the prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus charges against me that they would not allow her to do that again. So in other words I was free to call my accuser any fcuking time of the day or night. How is that for irony? So it was the complete opposite of a "restraining order" because I was free to do whatever the hell I wanted to do with that woman. But, I'm not pissed at Beverly especially since I don't really feel I won that jury trial. I feel that Beverly gave me that jury trial when she was caught in so many lies right on the witness stand. Here you can read more about it at: http://overprotectivemother.com/coppula.htm Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's pathetic life |
| Message-ID | <fauebc-kb5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518244 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both the > prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus charges > against me that they would not allow her to do that again. If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you wouldn't have been in court in the first place. If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you might be able to hold a job and have a normal relationship with someone. How's all that going for you right now? <snip babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN |
| Message-ID | <rv-dnU5-OOiCU3nInZ2dnUU7-RGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518270 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:fauebc-kb5.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both >> the >> prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus >> charges >> against me that they would not allow her to do that again. > > If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you wouldn't have been in > court in the first place. YOU ASSHOLE. I'll bet you never even looked at the evidence I presented in court. And all that really matters is Cheryl had questions for me, I had answers for her and her mother did every thing she could do to keep us from talking even before the end of high school. Don't tell me you never heard of a love triangle before. It sure looks that way given how st00pid you are. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's pathetic life |
| Message-ID | <nq1fbc-gm5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518285 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:fauebc-kb5.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both >>> the >>> prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus >>> charges >>> against me that they would not allow her to do that again. >> >> If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you wouldn't have been in >> court in the first place. > > YOU ASSHOLE. I'll bet you never even looked at the evidence I presented in > court. Why should I, kooktard? If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you wouldn't have been in court in the first place. Got a job, a girlfriend, or any friends, kook? Seek professional help for your delusions and maybe you will, kook. <snip remaining kook ravings> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN |
| Message-ID | <ms40hl$iv1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #518285 |
On 8/31/2015 5:58 PM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:fauebc-kb5.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both >>> the >>> prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus >>> charges >>> against me that they would not allow her to do that again. >> >> If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you wouldn't have been in >> court in the first place. > > YOU ASSHOLE. I'll bet you never even looked at the evidence I presented in > court. We have froth! > And all that really matters is Cheryl had questions for me, I had answers > for her and her mother did every thing she could do to keep us from talking > even before the end of high school. > > Don't tell me you never heard of a love triangle before. It sure looks that > way given how st00pid you are. Rocko, I read your letter just now. One thing is clear. You are truly psychotic. True psychotics are rare and totally enjoyable. Thank you for being you! -- "Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?" https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN |
| Message-ID | <ms8boc$b90$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #518366 |
On 9/1/2015 6:03 AM, HVAC wrote: > On 8/31/2015 5:58 PM, Rocky wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:fauebc-kb5.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both >>>> the >>>> prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus >>>> charges >>>> against me that they would not allow her to do that again. >>> >>> If you weren't such a delusional lunatic you wouldn't have been in >>> court in the first place. >> >> YOU ASSHOLE. I'll bet you never even looked at the evidence I >> presented in >> court. > > > We have froth! > If you don't look at his "evidence" presented in "some" court, you get "ASSHOLE". (an older person, with diseased brain, delusions of winning something in a "court" somewhere.) > >> And all that really matters is Cheryl had questions for me, I had answers >> for her and her mother did every thing she could do to keep us from >> talking >> even before the end of high school. >> >> Don't tell me you never heard of a love triangle before. It sure >> looks that >> way given how st00pid you are. > > > Rocko, I read your letter just now. One thing is clear. You are truly > psychotic. True psychotics are rare and totally enjoyable. Thank you for > being you! >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT |
| Message-ID | <evi9uatbts84o2ia9aombvs7vfs52ruvt5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #518244 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:59:11 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:8nqebc-115.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> result in restraining orders?
>
>ROTFLMAO because after I won that jury trial 12 to 0 I was told by both the
>prosecuting attorney and the judge that helped Beverly bring bogus charges
>against me that they would not allow her to do that again.
>
Since you had been found not guilty at the re-trial, jeopardy
applies. This means no matter what, you couldn't be tried for the
harassment you were accused of committing at the time of the initial
complaint.
>So in other words I was free to call my accuser any fcuking time of the day
>or night. How is that for irony?
>
That's not what they were saying, stupid. If you were to start
harassing the daughter today, you could be charged and tried for it.
>So it was the complete opposite of a "restraining order" because I was free
>to do whatever the hell I wanted to do with that woman.
>
It wasn't a restraining order because it wasn't a restraining
order. That would be a separate legal proceeding.
>But, I'm not pissed at Beverly especially since I don't really feel I won
>that jury trial.
You were found not guilty at the retrial. To any defendant,
that's a win.
>I feel that Beverly gave me that jury trial when she was
>caught in so many lies right on the witness stand.
How a defendant wins doesn't really matter, unless they used
something like jury tampering.
>
>Here you can read more about it at:
> http://overprotectivemother.com/coppula.htm
>
It's hard to follow your train of thought on your sites. It's
clear you've not had any formal written communications classes. You
make use of run on sentences and often jump around with your thoughts.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) |
| Message-ID | <f8e49efea376476b32a652f371d6e041@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #518205 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
woman-stalking failed truck driver), in
<news:W_WdnYpU057DNXnInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:dchebc-p24.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the
>> schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking
>> failed truck driver) <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:i65dbc-bls.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the
>>>> schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking
>>>> failed truck driver) <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:6ercbc-hnr.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the
>>>>>> schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking
>>>>>> failed truck driver) <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> If you get help you might be able to hold a job.
>>>>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>
Moron. LOL
>>>> You have admitted who you actually are, fool.
>>>>
>>>> So maybe if you get some professional help, these delusions about 9/11
>>>> will go away and you can actually hold a job.
>>> M<SMACKAKOOK!>
Moron. LOL
>> Yes, your delusions like the snipped remainder of this post.
> You haven't even tried to seriously look at the evidence that proves the
> Twin Towers did not collapse all the way to the ground because most of the
> Twin Towers floated awa<SMACKAKOOK!>
Liar. You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?
If your kooky conspiracy theory keeps changing in fundamental ways, it
cannot reflect reality, and thus must be impossible.
If your kooky conspiracy theory violates even one law of physics, it
is impossible.
That your kooky conspiracy theory constantly changes *and* violates
several laws of physics makes you the digital equivalent of the street
corner raving lunatic. Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. And stop
bringing up topics which have already been utterly refuted, you
idiotic ponce.
Moron. LOL
> A<SMACKAKOOK!>
You mean that stupidity-filled "movie" (read: rant) that offered no
proof whatsoever? You're devolving into utter insanity if you believe
that anti-semitic schlock.
I mean, really... the fireproofing project at the WTC towers was
actually a scheme to plant a plane-shaped nanothermite outline on the
towers... and the white smoke was indicative of the aluminum oxide in
the claimed nanothermite? It wasn't the aluminum facade burning? What
does aluminum do in a fire, Ko0k? Why, its passivation layer of
aluminum oxide burns off, does it not?
They used napalm in the tower? It wasn't the jet fuel exploding on
impact?
The wing disappeared? If that's the case, it would have disappeared on
all the personal videos, too, right? But it didn't, did it.
No, it certainly did not:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbWD_dGBIm8>
Whoopsie... the wing *did* disappear... behind a cloud of smoke. Which
the low-resolution camera wasn't able to differentiate from the open
sky, and thus the camera's firmware "lossied" out that part of the
wing... it's a digital camera artifact, nothing more. A
higher-resolution video from nearly the same angle (also in that video
above) *was* able to differentiate between the smoke, the wing and the
sky, and the wing is clearly visible throughout. And that's from
another 9/11 "inside job" kook... even those broken-brained kooks are
laughing at how insane you are.
And of course, no proof was offered throughout that movie... just
another street corner loony screaming out his insanity.
Moron. LOL
Do you really believe this insane shit, Roger Wittekind? LOL
You're mentally ill, Roger Wittekind. Seek immediate professional
psychiatric help, and ask for mega-doses of anti-psychotic meds.
Moron. LOL
> A<SMACKAKOOK!>
See above.
Moron. LOL
> And given exactly where the sun was on 9/11/01 where did the shadow on the
> fa<SMACKAKOOK!>
Your retarded brain believes every stupid goddamned thing you read on
the internet or watch on YouTube. If you could afford a TV, you'd be
the world's biggest "TV Hugger", you pathetic moronic piece of shit.
Uh oh... what's this, you fucking retard?
<http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/salter/review.html>
<http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/salter/summaryimages/shadowsequence.jpg>
Oh, is that a high-resolution high-framerate sequence of photos that
prove you're a delusional retard? Yeah, it is. Take your meds, Roger.
Moron. LOL
> And just why do you want to believe there was no radiation a<SMACKAKOOK!>
<http://www.takeourworldback.com/wtcnukeddisinfo.htm>
=====================================================
The absurdity of the "WTC was nuked" hoax
An excellent refutation of the "WTC was nuked" claims was provided by
Dr. Steven E. Jones, entitled "Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis
that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers". He summarized a few key
points as:
<http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf>
===============
The data clearly demonstrate the large amount of tritium released due
to hydrogen bombs, the first of which was tested in 1951. Thus,
tritium is a tracer for hydrogen bombs, the "smoking gun." Can
proponents of the WTC-mini-nuke hypothesis explain how large releases
of tritium did NOT happen on 9/11/2001?
Sediment cores pulled from the Hudson River near the World Trade
Center site just a month after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks
contain a thin layer of metal-rich ash and pulverized debris. The top
3 cm of silt contained layers with unnaturally high concentrations of
copper, strontium, and zinc from the towers, says Sarah D. Oktay, a
geochemist. "Oktay and her colleagues also found that the sediments
contain small but measurable quantities of iodine-131, a human-made
radioactive isotope with a half-life of about 8 days. Total iodine
concentrations were actually lower in the [WTC] debris-filled layers,
which means the source of the element probably isn't related to the
attacks."
Radionuclides. We analyzed the gamma spectrum of the samples using an
EG&G/Ortec high-purity Ge detector (50% relative efficiency) gamma
counter (EG&G/Ortec Instruments, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN). We analyzed
approximately 50 peaks based on statistical significance
(counting/lack of interferences). These included thorium, uranium,
actinium series, and primordial radionuclides. Liquid scintillation
analyses were conducted for emissions on the total dust and smoke
samples using a Packard Tri-Carb Model 2770 TR/SL (Packard Instrument,
Meriden, CT). The MDA for alpha radioactivity was 0.30 DPM (0.14 pCi)
based on a NIST-traceable 226Ra standard (National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD).
Results. We found only background levels of alpha radionuclide
activity by liquid scintillation counter analysis of all three
samples. Beta activity was slightly elevated, but not more than twice
the background level. There were no levels of gamma activity > 1 Bq/g
except for naturally occurring potassium-40. These very low levels of
radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) in the WTC dust are by themselves
sufficient to rule out the use of atomic bombs (even as triggers) at
the WTC, which could be construed as an absurd notion as it confronts
the empirical facts.
===============
{NOTE: The elevated beta radiation was likely just as I stated, the
tritium from the airplane exit signs and law enforcement weapon
sights. Beta particles are nothing more than high-energy electrons.}
- Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb
fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is strong
evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis.
- The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually lower
in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers.
- Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium, which
is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself does not
rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not support the
mini-nuke hypothesis.
- Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium,
actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the background
level for WTC dust.
- Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above
background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on
actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low Iodine-131
measured by independent researchers (point 2 above) and the low
radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again provides compelling
evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers hypothesis.
- No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near ground
zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse. No observed
melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the Towers.
- One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where
vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the collapse,
and the building fell quite neatly onto its own footprint. (Molten
metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as well.)
=====================================================
This has all been explained several times to you before, Roger. That
you keep popping back up like some retarded Weebles Wobble But They
Don't Fall Down after your idiocy is smacked down into the gutter
where it belongs proves your broken brain is desperately grasping at
straws because having to admit *you* *are* *wrong* would send you
spinning into an unrelenting insanity from which you'd never recover.
So your broken brain has decided to ease its way into that insanity.
Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. This doesn't end until you get
professional psychiatric help and admit *you* *are* *wrong*. Until
then, your life just gets worse and worse. We'll see to that.
Moron. LOL
> Rocky
Moron. LOL
--
Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394
Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.
Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.
For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.
B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".
C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).
D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.
E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL
F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL
G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL
H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.
I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.
IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================
Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) |
| Message-ID | <rc2dnSVXNNOLmXrInZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518071 |
"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:43ba4dcd-7d3b-42da-81a7-2b81eb4d0bf2@googlegroups.com... On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 12:37:35 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote: ... > You might want to take a look at why there was no moiré pattern in one of > the many bogus 9/11 plane strikes. And you don't even have to watch much > of > the following video to get that that section. <G> > > Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U > > Rocky I was bored enough to look at Rocky's latest, favorite video. As usual, a bunch of bunk and misunderstandings. Why was there no moiré pattern in one of the videos of the 9/11 plane strikes? For the obvious reason that the distance to building and camera resolution were not in the right proportions to cause a moiré pattern with the building. ========================== I hope you caught the fact that video was actually taken with a tripod and the reason they had to move it all around was to make it harder for someone to undo all the changes. And why do so many videos quit filming right after the alleged impact? Because they didn't want people to know that the roadrunner type cutouts were made from the inside out and not the outside in. <G> ------------------------------ If you want to laugh, check out the nonsense about the "black plane" seen in some of the videos. Someone clearly knows nothing about contrast in videos. Like every other rational thought presented, that explanation will (apparently) be ignored by Rocky. =================== I'll bet you didn't watch the second part of the video were it is explained that there is no way a jet could make the roadrunner cutouts meaing what we really saw on TV on 9/11 was just a life side Roadrunner cartoon that you fell for hook line and sinker. <G> ------------------ Dan (Woj...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) |
| Message-ID | <m7-dnRmcTOOf0XrInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518071 |
"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:43ba4dcd-7d3b-42da-81a7-2b81eb4d0bf2@googlegroups.com... > On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 12:37:35 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote: >.. > > Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U > > > Like every other rational thought presented, that explanation will > (apparently) be ignored by Rocky. If you notice there are two names in the above video. James Easton shows there were a lot of inconsistencies in the CGIs that were used in Nuke York City and Steve Grage gives a very good description of what would have happened if an aluminum jet had really rammed into the Twin Towers. It is basically what we saw in the following video: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs Between the two of them they proved that all we were really given on 9/11/01 was a life sized Disney cartoon with life size roadrunner cutouts where cameras had to stop filming the South Tower right after the CGI crashed to avoid showing the white smoke from the Thermite that was used to make the life size roadrunner cutouts. > Dan (Woj...) Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) |
| Message-ID | <fl78uahfeq3vlpqal02emplng9sfrrlfe4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #518042 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:21:28 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:6ercbc-hnr.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>..
>> If you get help you might be able to hold a job.
>
>You are trolling because only trolls stoop to personal attacks and you don't
Says the man who often calls people "fukcing stupid."
Your admission that you're a troll is noted and accepted, Rocky.
Now that you've admitted you're nothing more than a troll, what will
you do?
>even know what you are talking about anyway. <G>
You were permitted to keep your job after you rolled the tanker?
I suppose it is possible, though I would be amazed.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) |
| Message-ID | <31e6d430f95d583022ae4df521c6d313@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #518035 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com, in <news:6ercbc-hnr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic > paranoid-delusional woman-stalking failed truck driver) > <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> Ye<SMACKAKOOK!> > Only if you are a delusional nut job. Of course, Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional conspiracy kook will run away from this photographic proof because his broken brain is squirming and writhing in trying to avoid having to admit he's *wrong*, but: <http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/2012/09/american-airlines-77-hit-pentagon.html> "Provided is a combination of security camera footage, first hand eye witness accounts plus a summary of 136 eye witness accounts, RADAR data with ATC recordings, NTSB FDR data, damage to the Pentagon, damage to the surroundings, over 60 images of American Airlines and Boeing debris, full explanation and time line excerpt, DNA summaries, hijacker profile, and all round overwhelming evidence that American Airlines 77, and only American Airlines 77, impacted the Pentagon on 9/11." <http://i962.photobucket.com/albums/ae107/sniperNZSAS/77-1.jpg> <http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-grWExiKB1_M/UQ22ROA2ehI/AAAAAAAAATE/9wQPGnUOo50/s640/hole11.jpg> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4q35xHzjxB0> > <snip remaining delusional gibberish> > > If you get help you might be able to hold a job. That's highly unlikely... Roger Wittekind has been an obsessive paranoid-delusional schizophrenic for decades... it started in high school when he started stalking a girl because she wore blue jeans just like he did! His broken brain read into that things that were not there, and he continued to stalk her for nearly 20 years. When her mother stepped in to protect her daughter, he got the court case dismissed on a technicality. Not content to merely limp away and lick his wounds after losing the girl *and* getting his delusional retarded ass hauled into court, he then tried to litigiously harass the mother through the court system, for which he was officially sanctioned by the courts and fined $1500. After that debacle, he got a job as a trucker... and demonstrated many time his utter incompetence, finally culminating in him being charged with failure to maintain control of his tanker truck when he rolled it. But before all of that happened, his broken brain got him into quarrels with management to such an extent he was let go from a couple companies, lost his signing bonus, and had to pay a towing fee because he didn't follow dispatch instructions when his truck broke down (said breakdown because he thought he knew better than anyone else and ignored proper procedure). And now his broken paranoid-delusional schizo brain has latched onto the 9/11 events, hoping against hope that he can make a mark in this world and make a name for himself as anything other than a broken-brained kook. Problem for him is, if he's too fucking stupid to *drive* *a* *truck*, just how does the broken-brained little freak think he's sane enough to uncover the world's largest conspiracy plot? Especially when his broken brain can't seem to discern fantasy from reality. Yeah, Roger Wittekind is on the fast track to an involuntary psychiatric commitment. Let's just hope before that day comes, that they decide to bring back high-voltage shock treatment and lobotomies. <snicker> -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8npm0p.cjs.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517648 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>> news:e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com... >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, >>>> NC), in <news:R-ednWcwutGj833InZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly >>>> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma >>>>> City was nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to >>>>> do the >>>>> exact same >>>>> thing. >>>>> >>>>> NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE, AMERICANS HAVE DIED AND OUR GOVERNMENT >>>>> HAS LIED >>>>> >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/10/gordon-duff-nuclear-terror-the-khalezov-effect-video/ >>>> >>>> Bwahahahaaa! Poor paranoid delusional schizophrenic kook is off his >>>> meds and seeing nuclear detonations everywhere... >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass >>> or if one were used on the North Tower. >>> >>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs >>> can make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big >>> fire bombs? >>> Do you really think a collapse of the Twin Towers can take the top >>> 100+ floors of the Twin Towers and have them land somewhere else >>> besides the area where they once stood? See: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers >>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> no it doesn't > > Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. > > Rocky sure i do i have you and you're never right
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #517648 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net... >>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs can >>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire >>> bombs? If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong. ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining. It's the most used explosive in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe. The Oklahoma City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium nitrate+ nitromethane. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO >>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers >>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> no it doesn't >Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. Here's the evidence, Michael. 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the towers. 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud. 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers. 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim. 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and dust. 7) All the videos of the collapses show the towers collapsing from the top down, not the bottom up. 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers *while it was collapsing* weren't nuked. Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <Ep6dne01wtVhz3_InZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517735 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net... > >>>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs can >>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire >>>> bombs? > > If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong. > ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining. It's the most used explosive > in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe. The Oklahoma > City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium nitrate+ > nitromethane. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now why was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing damage from a single location? And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation Area?" >>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers >>>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> no it doesn't > >>Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. > > Here's the evidence, Michael. Nope, my name is not Mike, Michael or any varient of that and it never has been. Plus a lot of people can vouch for that. > 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small > amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the > towers. You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add to the lies from the media. > 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all > helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP. I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera. To me the ground shaking and the recorded EMP are two things that when tied together prove a nuclear detonation took place in Nuke York City. > 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud. Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud incase you didn't know. And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom cloud to say nukes. > 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers. ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not caught on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied about Ground Zero why not the USGS too? > 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down > 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim. That is more total bullshit from the Friendly Neighborhood Nut and I even gave him a link to try and correct his bullshit: Here see for yourself it is more like 77 meters below surface level. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition > 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves > nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and > dust. ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive dirt hauled out. And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > 7) All the videos of the collapses show the towers collapsing from the top > down, not the bottom up. ROTFLMAO because the debris on the ground where the Twin Towers were was not from the top 100 floors but from the bottom 10 floors or less. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers *while > it was collapsing* weren't nuked. Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but there is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now. > Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on? I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an attorney present to represent me. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <8v2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517750 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North > Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not caught > on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. The USGS is not the only entity running seismographs, you delusional kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <VY6dnVmxHcIR-3_InZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517760 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:8v2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the >> North >> Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not >> caught >> on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. > > The USGS is not the only entity running seismographs But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html So because we have evidence of volent shaking of the North Tower that coninsides with an EMP recorded by an AM reciever we have two things that say nuke and one that doesn't. And since the USGS could be doing things in the name of "National Securtity" that means we have two things that says nukes and an obvious cover-up that nukes were used at Ground Zero. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <lq9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517771 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the > seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds > before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling kook. > >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html > > So because we have evidence of volent shaking of the North Tower that > coninsides with an EMP recorded by an AM reciever we have two things that > say nuke and one that doesn't. There was no EMP and those services use FM, not AM, you delusional, parnoid, kook. > And since the USGS could be doing things in the name of "National Securtity" > that means we have two things that says nukes and an obvious cover-up that > nukes were used at Ground Zero. You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web