Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703799 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-21 13:36 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 73 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:33 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 10:56 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:05 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:40 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:51 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:11 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:16 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:15 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:38 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 22:00 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 17:04 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 19:41 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:00 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:55 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:15 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:07 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:22 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:28 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:24 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:21 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:36 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:38 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 11:14 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:14 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 15:02 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:12 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 17:53 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 13:44 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 20:36 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 14:08 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:25 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:35 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:54 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:18 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:43 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 23:05 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:07 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:21 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 20:02 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:26 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:39 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:00 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 11:17 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:56 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-23 00:06 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:10 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-23 00:27 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:31 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:04 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:06 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:16 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:36 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:44 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:53 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:13 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:19 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:25 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:06 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:23 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 23:32 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:56 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:14 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:28 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 13:36 -0500
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400 |
| Subject | The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit |
| Message-ID | <po2nje$17ih$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures evaporating the river: https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 11:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po330u$1vem$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703799 |
On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: > Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow over > the last century is largely due to rising temperatures evaporating the > river: > > https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger areas of water behind the dam that was built to give the "renewable" energy that the left keeps demanding. So basically we have a left-caused problem of evaporation which now as usual they try to blame on something else. Left never are responsible for any problems. Just ask them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po34bl$2be$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703829 |
On 9/21/2018 10:33 AM, benj wrote: > On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >> evaporating the river: >> >> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > > "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > > Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger areas > of water behind the dam that was built to give the "renewable" energy > that the left keeps demanding. So basically we have a left-caused > problem of evaporation which now as usual they try to blame on something > else. Left never are responsible for any problems. Just ask them. who would have thought a total of just 0.1 C rise in temperature over 150 years would dry up a river! what about summer when the temp is 20 C higher ? Does the river dry up every summer ? poor kensi pupa, you not learning now. time for your medicine, not the bong stuff either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 12:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po34t3$2si$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703829 |
On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: > On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >> evaporating the river: >> >> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > > "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > > Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger areas > of water behind the dam that<SPANK> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <IObpD.138158$tK2.127595@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #703839 |
On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: > On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>> evaporating the river: >>> >>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >> >> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >> >> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> > Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, > as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). Would not a global temperature increase result in more evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more rainfall over land?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk076b.jkb.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703885 |
On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>> evaporating the river: >>>> >>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>> >>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>> >>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > > Would not a global temperature increase result in more > evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > rainfall over land? > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 19:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lnuf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703888 |
In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>> >>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>> >>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>> >>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >> >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >> rainfall over land? >> > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk08ri.dkh.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703897 |
On 2018-09-21 12:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>> >>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>> >>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>> >>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>> rainfall over land? >>> >> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > and you can earn a living from a sock eye
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 14:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360eff7aad5f9710994b48@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703900 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bk08ri.dkh.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-09-21 12:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: > >>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow > >>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures > >>>>>> evaporating the river: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > >>>>> > >>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > >>>>> > >>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger > >>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> > >>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > >>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as > >>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > >>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > >>> > >>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > >>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > >>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > >>> rainfall over land? > >>> > >> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > > > and you can earn a living from a sock eye I'd love to give you one. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 21:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvhxon.haeeb91pnjebrN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #703897 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: [...] > >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as > >>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > >> > >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > >> rainfall over land? > >> > > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. Don't carp, goldfish know about water. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 16:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <malaqdhjlhlu27ogsp95fi7v99tvvfvb2k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703903 |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 21:15:37 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: ><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >[...] > >> >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >> >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >> >>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >> >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >> >> >> >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >> >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >> >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >> >> rainfall over land? >> >> >> > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >> >> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > >Don't carp, goldfish know about water. Don't be an Aholehole, don't beat your own Drum. Stop Floundering around. No more Grunts out of you. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles onto a fact that is in opposition to her intuition, she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she's offered evidence that affords a reason for acting in accordance with her feelings, she will embrace it even on the flimsiest of evidence. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvhzrh.e61yyqlce8vzN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #703903 |
Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <1nvhxon.haeeb91pnjebrN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 > @gmail.com says... > > > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > > > >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as > > > >>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > > > >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > > > >> > > > >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > > > >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > > > >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > > > >> rainfall over land? > > > >> > > > > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > > > > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > > > > Don't carp, goldfish know about water. > > Some bass holed opinion. Oh cod, it's another fish pun thread. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 17:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b4naqd1mop1jg9doc5hua0h37c2rualr02@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703919 |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:00:28 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> , snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... >> > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > > >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >> > > >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >> > > >>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >> > > >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >> > > >> >> > > >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >> > > >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >> > > >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >> > > >> rainfall over land? >> > > >> >> > > > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >> > > >> > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >> > >> > Don't carp, goldfish know about water. >> >> Some bass holed opinion. > >Oh cod, it's another fish pun thread. I just might have to Killifish file this thread. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles onto a fact that is in opposition to her intuition, she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she's offered evidence that affords a reason for acting in accordance with her feelings, she will embrace it even on the flimsiest of evidence. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 19:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po4340$1isq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703924 |
On 9/21/2018 4:04 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:00:28 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> , snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>>>> >>>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>>>> >>>>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >>>> >>>> Don't carp, goldfish know about water. >>> >>> Some bass holed opinion. >> >> Oh cod, it's another fish pun thread. > > I just might have to Killifish file this thread. > you're floundering around
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 09:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h5fcqdhqdpfckgta56nbetqalkpr3pkb5i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703974 |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:41:40 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 9/21/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >>> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> , snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>>>>> >>>>>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >>>>> >>>>> Don't carp, goldfish know about water. >>>> >>>> Some bass holed opinion. >>> >>> Oh cod, it's another fish pun thread. >> >> I just might have to Killifish file this thread. >> >you're floundering around Yup, that was kind of a Crappie statement. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360efa95d095013994b3f@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703897 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <lnuf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: > >>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: > >>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow > >>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures > >>>>> evaporating the river: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > >>>> > >>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > >>>> > >>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger > >>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> > >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as > >>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > >> > >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > >> rainfall over land? > >> > > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. That's being generous. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hQfpD.30899$xo2.21707@fx31.iad> |
| In reply to | #703897 |
On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>> >>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>> >>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>> >>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>> rainfall over land? >>> >> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- and do so with absurd lies. It is quite telling of your lack of confidence in your own ideas.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f3810d2222ef8994b60@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703971 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <hQfpD.30899$xo2.21707@fx31.iad>, jfwaldby@gmail.com says... > > On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: > >>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow > >>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures > >>>>>> evaporating the river: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > >>>>> > >>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > >>>>> > >>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger > >>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> > >>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > >>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as > >>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > >>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > >>> > >>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > >>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > >>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > >>> rainfall over land? > >>> > >> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > > > Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. > > See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- > and do so with absurd lies. > > It is quite telling of your lack of confidence in your own ideas. He was replying to the idiot known as %. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 09:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3kfcqd9sm8t3865cjrdfn9mtt6dodabme4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703981 |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:17:43 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: <...> >He was replying to the idiot known as %. Wouldn't that be *blithering idiot*? -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <R5vpD.77840$SN2.44916@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #704090 |
On 9/22/2018 7:07 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:17:43 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> He was replying to the idiot known as %. > > Wouldn't that be *blithering idiot*? What's the difference between a blithering idiot and the ordinary garden variety idiot?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web