Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #523990 > unrolled thread

911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:54 -0500
    Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 20:51 +0000
      Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:05 +0000
        Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:34 -0500
          Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000
          Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:07 +0000
            Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 13:35 -0500
              Re: 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:16 -0400
    just say, dUh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 18:42 -0700

#523990 — 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon

Reposted for Bast

911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBhJAvnv_Us

  ================================

And in an earlier thread I pointed out that there was a 6 minute time 
difference between when the 9/11 Commission claimed Fake 77 rammed the 
Pentagon and when clocks at the Pentagon stopped.

Not only does the following video help prove we were lied to about a 757 
flying into the Pentagon but Barbara even goes into other reasons why we 
know there was really is a time discrepancy in the 9/11 fairytale.

Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#524003

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> Reposted for Bast
> 
> 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon

Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.

It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
and goes downhill from there.


<snip remaining lunatic babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524059

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:

>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> Reposted for Bast
>> 
>> 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon

>Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.

>It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
>an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
>and goes downhill from there.

Of course, it's all lies.  Rocky himself proved all kookvids are full of
lies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524120

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:muibdi$4mb$1@pcls7.std.com...
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:
>
>>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> Reposted for Bast
>>>
>>> 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon
>
>>Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.
>
>>It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
>>an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
>>and goes downhill from there.
>
> Of course, it's all lies.  Rocky himself proved all kookvids are full of
> lies.

You are the one that can't tell the difference between a nuke detonated 77 
meters underground in solid rock or one detonated right on the ground.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524132

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
> news:muibdi$4mb$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>> Reposted for Bast
>>>>
>>>> 911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon
>>
>>>Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.
>>
>>>It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
>>>an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
>>>and goes downhill from there.
>>
>> Of course, it's all lies.  Rocky himself proved all kookvids are full of
>> lies.
> 
> You are the one that can't tell the difference between a nuke detonated 77 
> meters underground in solid rock or one detonated right on the ground.

The only nukes are the ones in your delusions, raving kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524696

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:muibdi$4mb$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:

>>>Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.
>>
>>>It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
>>>an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
>>>and goes downhill from there.
>>
>> Of course, it's all lies.  Rocky himself proved all kookvids are full of
>> lies.

>You are the one that can't tell the difference between a nuke detonated 77 
>meters underground in solid rock or one detonated right on the ground.

Kooktard, quit changing the subject. We're discussing how all kookvids are
full of lies.  Perhaps you can give more information.  Do kookvids have to 
have a certain number of lies per minute before they can be uploaded to
Youtube?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524711

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:muue9q$ad8$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:muibdi$4mb$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:
>
>>>>Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.
>>>
>>>>It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
>>>>an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
>>>>and goes downhill from there.
>>>
>>> Of course, it's all lies.  Rocky himself proved all kookvids are full of
>>> lies.
>
>>You are the one that can't tell the difference between a nuke detonated 77
>>meters underground in solid rock or one detonated right on the ground.
>
> Kooktard, quit changing the subject. We're discussing how all kookvids are
> full of lies.  Perhaps you can give more information.  Do kookvids have to
> have a certain number of lies per minute before they can be uploaded to
> Youtube?

Full of lies?  Look at all the different stories told about the Pentagon by 
you, other posters on this NG, Popular Mechanics and Mike Walter.

Isn't it funny how the government has to rely on so many stories where not a 
single one of them is true but it gives people like you multiple guesses 
when people like you are too stupid to realize the government never gave us 
a correct answer.  DUH

Hell even you posted a video showing a jet flying apart when it hit a wall 
just like the wall in the Pentagon even though Popular Mechanics claimed it 
"flowed into the structure."

All you have done lately is proven you have been caught up in a web of lies 
yourself when you posted the following:

>> "This is what happens when a jet hits concrete at 500 mph.
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q35xHzjxB0 "

Yes, only a missile or three could have made it through the wall at the 
Pentagon and you proved that above.  DUH

And three missiles would also explain why there were so many different 
attack times at the Pentagon when one stopped clocks and watches and one 6 
minutes later was when a 757 was supposed to have arrived at the scene.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524724

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:35:59 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:muue9q$ad8$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:muibdi$4mb$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:
>>
>>>>>Just yet another kook youtube video that ignores reality.
>>>>
>>>>>It starts with the lunatic logic that because there were no videos of
>>>>>an airplane striking the Pentagon, there could not have been an airplane
>>>>>and goes downhill from there.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, it's all lies.  Rocky himself proved all kookvids are full of
>>>> lies.
>>
>>>You are the one that can't tell the difference between a nuke detonated 77
>>>meters underground in solid rock or one detonated right on the ground.
>>
>> Kooktard, quit changing the subject. We're discussing how all kookvids are
>> full of lies.  Perhaps you can give more information.  Do kookvids have to
>> have a certain number of lies per minute before they can be uploaded to
>> Youtube?
>
>Full of lies?  

Yes Roger Rocky, you and Bast are full of lies.   

>Look at all the different stories told about the Pentagon by 

You and Bast :   It was a missile.  It explosives.    There was no
plane.   It was a plane but not Flight 77.  

>you, other posters on this NG, Popular Mechanics and Mike Walter.

You've discredited Mike Walter and the posters on this ng have
discredited your CNN, Popular Science, and NIST claims.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524038 — just say, dUh

it might just have been an old legacy problematum,
how they set the clocks to the current atomic time,
where ever that is being cesiumed

> Not only does the following video help prove we were lied to about a 757 
> flying into the Pentagon but Barbara even goes into other reasons why we 
> know there was really is a time discrepancy in the 9/11 fairytale.
> 
> Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015)
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw
> 
> Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web