Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #543840 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-08 07:45 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-01-09 14:30 -0800 |
| Articles | 8 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 07:45 -0600
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2016-01-08 07:11 -0800
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2016-01-08 07:21 -0800
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-08 15:32 +0000
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2016-01-08 09:27 -0800
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 09:19 +0100
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-08 20:09 +0000
Re: A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-09 14:30 -0800
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 07:45 -0600 |
| Subject | A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel |
| Message-ID | <5tydnfI627nxIBLLnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html > A team of researchers working at the University of Science and > Technology of China has developed a new and potentially better > electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic > acid, which could be used as a liquid fuel. In their paper published > in the journal Nature, the team describes their new process and > suggests that it may provide a path to reducing carbon dioxide > emissions and thus help to slow global warming. > > As the planet continues to warm due in large part to carbon dioxide > emissions from coal fired power plants, researchers around the world > are working furiously to find a way to pull out the carbon dioxide > from emissions before they are allowed to pass into the atmosphere, > and to use them in some other way—one that is economically feasible. > Many would like to see the carbon dioxide converted to something > useful, such as a type of fuel that could be burned and used as a > clean power source—that would make the process far more financially > palatable. But thus far, such efforts and have not panned out, due to > the huge costs involved. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 07:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fbafd45b-2e9c-43b7-a25a-7fd95d3a2cba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #543840 |
On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 2:45:21 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote: > A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html > > > > A team of researchers working at the University of Science and > > Technology of China has developed a new and potentially better > > electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic > > acid, which could be used as a liquid fuel. In their paper published > > in the journal Nature, the team describes their new process and > > suggests that it may provide a path to reducing carbon dioxide > > emissions and thus help to slow global warming. > > > > As the planet continues to warm due in large part to carbon dioxide > > emissions from coal fired power plants, researchers around the world > > are working furiously to find a way to pull out the carbon dioxide > > from emissions before they are allowed to pass into the atmosphere, > > and to use them in some other way--one that is economically feasible. > > Many would like to see the carbon dioxide converted to something > > useful, such as a type of fuel that could be burned and used as a > > clean power source That fuel > > --that would make the process far more financially > > palatable. But thus far, such efforts and have not panned out, due to > > the huge costs involved. > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 07:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0dfa124e-1e93-4b9d-89bf-72f95627e378@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #543840 |
On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 2:45:21 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote: > A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html > > > > A team of researchers working at the University of Science and > > Technology of China has developed a new and potentially better > > electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic > > acid, which could be used as a liquid fuel. Something like: CO2 + H2 --> HCOOH > > In their paper published > > in the journal Nature, the team describes their new process and > > suggests that it may provide a path to reducing carbon dioxide > > emissions and thus help to slow global warming. > > > > As the planet continues to warm due in large part to carbon dioxide > > emissions from coal fired power plants, researchers around the world > > are working furiously to find a way to pull out the carbon dioxide > > from emissions before they are allowed to pass into the atmosphere, > > and to use them in some other way--one that is economically feasible. > > Many would like to see the carbon dioxide converted to something > > useful, such as a type of fuel that could be burned and used as a > > clean power source That fuel, when used, would produce CO2: same amount that was subtracted. HCOOH + 1/2 O2 --> H2O + CO2 Those CO2 haters are really funny regards Angelo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 15:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n6okr4$l28$1@odin.sdf-eu.org> |
| In reply to | #543850 |
Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> wrote: > On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 2:45:21 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote: >> A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel >> > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html >> > A team of researchers working at the University of Science and >> > Technology of China has developed a new and potentially better >> > electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic >> > acid, which could be used as a liquid fuel. > Something like: > CO2 + H2 --> HCOOH >> > In their paper published >> > in the journal Nature, the team describes their new process and >> > suggests that it may provide a path to reducing carbon dioxide >> > emissions and thus help to slow global warming. >> > As the planet continues to warm due in large part to carbon dioxide >> > emissions from coal fired power plants, researchers around the world >> > are working furiously to find a way to pull out the carbon dioxide >> > from emissions before they are allowed to pass into the atmosphere, >> > and to use them in some other way--one that is economically feasible. >> > Many would like to see the carbon dioxide converted to something >> > useful, such as a type of fuel that could be burned and used as a >> > clean power source > That fuel, when used, would produce CO2: same amount that was subtracted. > HCOOH + 1/2 O2 --> H2O + CO2 It's better to increase GHG from buried carbon? > Those CO2 haters are really funny http://berkeleyearth.lbl.gov/regions/italy Ha ha. > regards > Angelo -- [400,000 years of carbon dioxide:] <http://assets.climatecentral.org/images/made/2015MileMarkers_ 400ppm_web_660_372_s_c1_c_c.jpg>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61359a9f-a06b-4bdd-857e-37a653bb7f23@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #543853 |
On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 4:42:29 PM UTC+1, Kym Horsell wrote: > Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> wrote: > > On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 2:45:21 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel > >> > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html > >> > A team of researchers working at the University of Science and > >> > Technology of China has developed a new and potentially better > >> > electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic > >> > acid, which could be used as a liquid fuel. > > Something like: > > CO2 + H2 --> HCOOH > >> > In their paper published > >> > in the journal Nature, the team describes their new process and > >> > suggests that it may provide a path to reducing carbon dioxide > >> > emissions and thus help to slow global warming. > >> > As the planet continues to warm due in large part to carbon dioxide > >> > emissions from coal fired power plants, researchers around the world > >> > are working furiously to find a way to pull out the carbon dioxide > >> > from emissions before they are allowed to pass into the atmosphere, > >> > and to use them in some other way--one that is economically feasible. > >> > Many would like to see the carbon dioxide converted to something > >> > useful, such as a type of fuel that could be burned and used as a > >> > clean power source > > That fuel, when used, would produce CO2: same amount that was subtracted. > > HCOOH + 1/2 O2 --> H2O + CO2 > > It's better to increase GHG from buried carbon? No, but that method is fiction at best. > > Those CO2 haters are really funny > > http://berkeleyearth.lbl.gov/regions/italy > > Ha ha. The gist was like this: I capture CO2 from air, and this costs work and money, to make a fuel; then the fuel is burned (what else for a fuel?), and gives CO2 back to the air. Sincerely I think that all this is quite funny. They do not store (chemically) CO2 in stones, say making some carbonate. > -- > [400,000 years of carbon dioxide:] > <http://assets.climatecentral.org/images/made/2015MileMarkers_ > 400ppm_web_660_372_s_c1_c_c.jpg> regards Angelo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-09 09:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n6qfln$kpp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #543850 |
Dne 08/01/2016 v 16:21 Angelo napsal(a): > > That fuel, when used, would produce CO2: same amount that was subtracted. > > HCOOH + 1/2 O2 --> H2O + CO2 > > Those CO2 haters are really funny > Autonomous CO2 recycling solar powered systems need not energy inputs, but provide energy, together with construction and art material and various cultural values. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 20:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkh5mc-c4o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #543840 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel >> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html > > >> A team of researchers working at the University of Science and >> Technology of China has developed a new and potentially better >> electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic >> acid, which could be used as a liquid fuel. In their paper published >> in the journal Nature, the team describes their new process and >> suggests that it may provide a path to reducing carbon dioxide >> emissions and thus help to slow global warming. >> >> As the planet continues to warm due in large part to carbon dioxide >> emissions from coal fired power plants, researchers around the world >> are working furiously to find a way to pull out the carbon dioxide >> from emissions before they are allowed to pass into the atmosphere, >> and to use them in some other way?one that is economically feasible. >> Many would like to see the carbon dioxide converted to something >> useful, such as a type of fuel that could be burned and used as a >> clean power source?that would make the process far more financially >> palatable. But thus far, such efforts and have not panned out, due to >> the huge costs involved. So where is the energy needed to do this supposed to come from? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-09 14:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <n6s1j1$jot$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #543840 |
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> cut, pasted &wrote A better electrocatalyst for converting carbon dioxide into liquid fuel http://phys.org/news/2016-01-electrocatalyst-carbon-dioxide-liquid-fuel.html developed a new and potentially (heavy on the Potential, IOW, it's only an Idea) better electrocatalyst for use in converting carbon dioxide into methanoic acid, which is the SAME as FORMIC ACID, could be used as a liquid fuel, like: CO2 + H2 --> HCOOH >> >> > hanson wrote: Formic acid, HCOOH, is highly corrosive and has a stinging smell and is the chemical toxin that causes the pain from the ants' bites. > Formic acid is so dangerous it has a OSHA workplace limit of 5 ppm. Formic acid is TWICE as toxic as is Cyanide, HCN (Zyklon B), which OSHA limits to 10 ppm. ... Here then is an example of the sick Green mentality of enviros.... .... ROTFLMAO! > HCOOH converts easily into water & CO, CARBON MONOXIDE, which is an odorless, tasteless highly toxic gas that is deadly already at 35 ppm which is some 10% of the advertised 350+ ppm CO2 for CC caue. > So, develop that Formic acid technology and then, hopefully, all the Green Shits, all of who suck on the public trough, in one form or another, will die in their CC hysteria & eco-fanaticism from CO suffocation... > Truism: ... there is nothing filthier and more criminal then being an enviro!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web