Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #523935 > unrolled thread

9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-09-30 08:56 -0500
Last post2015-09-30 20:04 -0700
Articles 5 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 08:56 -0500
    Re: 9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:22 -0700
      Re: 9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:48 -0400
    Re: 9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:43 +0000
      Re: 9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 20:04 -0700

#523935 — 9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-30 08:56 -0500
Subject9/11: The Pentagon Clock Problem points to another 9/11 fairytale
Message-ID<SIadnXsKVo2jdJbLnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
If you think you know when the Pentagon was hit by a jet guess again because 
there is a problem with that part of the Official 9/11 fairytale too.

The damage done to the Pentagon really started about 6 minutes before the 
9/11 Commission claimed the Pentagon was attacked.  Link at bottom of post.

Because of "The Pentagon clock problem" I believe that Flight 93 was going 
to be blamed for the damage done to the Pentagon but that flight took off 
too late and so the Hijacker Hoaxsters had to make changes on the fly but 
people had already started destroying the Pentagon before the bogus blip on 
the radar made it there.

"The Pentagon clock problem"
 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x13460 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#523942

Fromje suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where>
Date2015-09-30 07:22 -0700
Message-ID<charlie-gordon1492-2A46A8.07220330092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>
In reply to#523935
In article <SIadnXsKVo2jdJbLnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> If you think you know when the Pentagon was hit by a jet guess again because 
> there is a problem with that part of the Official 9/11 fairytale too.
> 
> The damage done to the Pentagon really started about 6 minutes before the 
> 9/11 Commission claimed the Pentagon was attacked.  Link at bottom of post.
> 
> Because of "The Pentagon clock problem" I believe that Flight 93 was going 
> to be blamed for the damage done to the Pentagon but that flight took off 
> too late and so the Hijacker Hoaxsters had to make changes on the fly but 
> people had already started destroying the Pentagon before the bogus blip on 
> the radar made it there.

According to this Pentagon clock
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Big_ben_closeup.jpg
the attack actually occurred half an hour later.

-- 
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#523943

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-09-30 10:48 -0400
Message-ID<mugskb$92r$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#523942

je suis charly wrote:
> In article <SIadnXsKVo2jdJbLnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> If you think you know when the Pentagon was hit by a jet guess again
>> because there is a problem with that part of the Official 9/11
>> fairytale too.
>>
>> The damage done to the Pentagon really started about 6 minutes before
>> the 9/11 Commission claimed the Pentagon was attacked.  Link at bottom
>> of post.
>>
>> Because of "The Pentagon clock problem" I believe that Flight 93 was
>> going to be blamed for the damage done to the Pentagon but that flight
>> took off too late and so the Hijacker Hoaxsters had to make changes on
>> the fly but people had already started destroying the Pentagon before
>> the bogus blip on the radar made it there.
>
> According to this Pentagon clock
>
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Big_ben_closeup.jpg
> the attack actually occurred half an hour later.






Big Ben is owned by the pentagon ?
Even for the official 9/11 fairytalers, , this is a sad attempt at derailing 
the thread.


Here you go,
Try your comical debunking of  THIS video.

911 ; definitely proof,no plane hit the Pentagon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBhJAvnv_Us 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#523969

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-30 17:43 +0000
Message-ID<lijtdc-mur.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#523935
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> If you think you know when the Pentagon was hit by a jet guess again because 
> there is a problem with that part of the Official 9/11 fairytale too.
> 
> The damage done to the Pentagon really started about 6 minutes before the 
> 9/11 Commission claimed the Pentagon was attacked.  Link at bottom of post.

Very few clocks even today are anywhere near synchronized to the correct
time, raving lunatic.

About the only ones that are are the so called atomic clocks that synch
to WWVB and those didn't exist outside lbaratories in 2001, lunatic.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#524054

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-30 20:04 -0700
Message-ID<7d2e2b60-c151-48b0-975a-a07bd9ae6460@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#523969
that is why I always get a receipt,
atomic time (point-of-sale in leiu of a watch

> Very few clocks even today are anywhere near synchronized to the correct
> time, raving lunatic.
> 
> About the only ones that are are the so called atomic clocks that synch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web