Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726976 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 225 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-12 21:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 13:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:01 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 09:05 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:03 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:14 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 15:27 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:44 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 10:57 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 13:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 12:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 12:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 08:07 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 16:33 +0000
Snit Once Again Publicy Worships AOC and Her Herd Of Unicorns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-13 11:48 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 10:18 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 21:58 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 22:24 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 15:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 17:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 13:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 14:37 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-13 12:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:22 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 05:57 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 06:11 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 18:07 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 13:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 20:45 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp - 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 16:14 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:50 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:52 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 14:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 14:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 03:54 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 08:00 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:20 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:15 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:09 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:17 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 15:59 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:08 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:14 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-14 15:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:08 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:21 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 23:16 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 02:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 08:28 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:51 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 11:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 15:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 16:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:38 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:54 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:56 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:46 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 19:54 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:23 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:45 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:51 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:41 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:24 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 20:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 20:30 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 20:55 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:01 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:02 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 18:11 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:01 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 18:21 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:42 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:17 -0700
Snit Keeps crying to himself Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 17:23 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:16 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:20 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 17:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:37 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:39 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:42 -0700
Poor Snit complains to himself. Again. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-14 16:43 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:10 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 18:18 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 13:44 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 11:48 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:27 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:24 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:40 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 12:26 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 15:58 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-14 16:20 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-14 14:32 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:30 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:42 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 18:47 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 18:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:13 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:25 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:29 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:31 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:43 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:44 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:53 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 20:02 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:04 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-13 20:29 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-13 19:33 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-14 09:39 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-14 10:39 -0600
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:35 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-14 10:36 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 05:48 +0200
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:28 -0800
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-13 07:47 -0500
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:50 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:49 -0700
Re: With climate change, what will your city's weather feel like in 60 years? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-13 08:44 -0700
Page 5 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 12 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 20:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <49cejf-ung.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #727097 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>> >>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>> >>> >>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>> >>> Do you even know? >> >> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. > > So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for > you. No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word "evidence". There is a very high probability, but no evidence. > I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your > area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. > Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have > some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, > and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. Do you understand what the word "probability" means? It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case there will be no more sun rises. The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >> speculation. >> >> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >> >> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >> wrong. >> >> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >> >> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >> every speculative "tipping point"? > > As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in > terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are > the best on the table. Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference between probability and evidence. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 13:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvulfo.pc.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727110 |
On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>> >>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>> >>>> Do you even know? >>> >>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >> >> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >> you. > > No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word > "evidence". > > There is a very high probability, but no evidence. > >> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. > > The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. > >> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. > > Do you understand what the word "probability" means? > > It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case > there will be no more sun rises. > > The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. > > >>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>> speculation. >>> >>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>> >>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>> wrong. >>> >>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>> >>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>> every speculative "tipping point"? >> >> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >> the best on the table. > > Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference > between probability and evidence. > > now i'm the jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce359be6a6e22713d9@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727111 |
In article <bvulfo.pc.19.1@news.alt.net>, jimp says... > >On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>> >>>>> Do you even know? >>>> >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>> >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>> you. >> >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >> "evidence". >> >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >> >>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >> >> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >> >>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >> >> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >> >> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >> there will be no more sun rises. >> >> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >> >> >>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>> speculation. >>>> >>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>> >>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>> >>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>> the best on the table. >> >> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >> between probability and evidence. >> >> > >now i'm the jimp hi jimp, whats a jimp?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvumu0.7is.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727117 |
On 2019-02-13 2:10 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <bvulfo.pc.19.1@news.alt.net>, jimp says... >> >> On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>> >>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>> >>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>> you. >>> >>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>> "evidence". >>> >>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>> >>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >>> >>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >>> >>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >>> >>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>> >>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >>> there will be no more sun rises. >>> >>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>> >>> >>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>>> speculation. >>>>> >>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>>> wrong. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>> >>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>> >>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>>> the best on the table. >>> >>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >>> between probability and evidence. >>> >>> >> >> now i'm the jimp > > hi jimp, whats a jimp? > i'm the jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce374bc554849a13dd@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727121 |
In article <bvumu0.7is.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > >On 2019-02-13 2:10 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >> In article <bvulfo.pc.19.1@news.alt.net>, jimp says... >>> >>> On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>>> >>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>>> you. >>>> >>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>>> "evidence". >>>> >>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>> >>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >>>> >>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >>>> >>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >>>> >>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>> >>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>> >>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>>>> speculation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>>>> wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>> >>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>> >>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>>>> the best on the table. >>>> >>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >>>> between probability and evidence. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> now i'm the jimp >> >> hi jimp, whats a jimp? >> >i'm the jimp i see that, there is another guy here that thinks he is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvunhn.7is.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727123 |
On 2019-02-13 2:17 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <bvumu0.7is.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >> >> On 2019-02-13 2:10 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <bvulfo.pc.19.1@news.alt.net>, jimp says... >>>> >>>> On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>>>> you. >>>>> >>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>>>> "evidence". >>>>> >>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>>> >>>>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>>>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >>>>> >>>>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >>>>> >>>>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>>>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>>>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >>>>> >>>>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>>>> >>>>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >>>>> there will be no more sun rises. >>>>> >>>>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>>>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>>>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>>>>> wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>>>> >>>>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>>>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>>>>> the best on the table. >>>>> >>>>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >>>>> between probability and evidence. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> now i'm the jimp >>> >>> hi jimp, whats a jimp? >>> >> i'm the jimp > > i see that, there is another guy here that thinks he is. > i know everyone wants to be me no matter who i say i am
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 16:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q421bq$in3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727111 |
On 2/13/2019 3:50 PM, jimp wrote: > On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>> >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>> >>>>> Do you even know? >>>> >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>> >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>> you. >> >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >> "evidence". >> >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >> >>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >> >> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >> >>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >> >> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >> >> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >> there will be no more sun rises. >> >> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >> >>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that >>>> some speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>> speculation. >>>> >>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we >>>> would be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>> >>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> >>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>> >>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>> the best on the table. >> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >> between probability and evidence. >> > now i'm the jimp Ditch the toque and put on a jimp, hoser. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvunfd.7is.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727119 |
On 2019-02-13 2:14 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 2/13/2019 3:50 PM, jimp wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>> >>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>> >>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will >>>> for >>>> you. >>> >>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>> "evidence". >>> >>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>> >>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >>> >>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >>> >>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >>> >>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>> >>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >>> there will be no more sun rises. >>> >>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >>> >>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant >>>>> that some speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it >>>>> is all still >>>>> speculation. >>>>> >>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we >>>>> would be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>>> wrong. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic >>>>> over >>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>> >>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>>> the best on the table. >>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >>> between probability and evidence. >>> >> now i'm the jimp > > Ditch the toque and put on a jimp, hoser. > hey , you see me much faster when i'm the jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 15:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce4d1333ea1b7b9964a4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #727119 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q421bq$in3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... ¤ ¤ On 2/13/2019 3:50 PM, jimp wrote: ¤ > On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: ¤ >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: ¤ >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: ¤ >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: ¤ >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be ¤ >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. ¤ >>>>>> ¤ >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. ¤ >>>>>> ¤ >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? ¤ >>>>> ¤ >>>>> Do you even know? ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. ¤ >>> ¤ >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for ¤ >>> you. ¤ >> ¤ >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word ¤ >> "evidence". ¤ >> ¤ >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. ¤ >> ¤ >>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your ¤ >>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. ¤ >> ¤ >> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. ¤ >> ¤ >>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have ¤ >>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, ¤ >>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. ¤ >> ¤ >> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? ¤ >> ¤ >> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case ¤ >> there will be no more sun rises. ¤ >> ¤ >> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. ¤ >> ¤ >>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that ¤ >>>> some speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still ¤ >>>> speculation. ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we ¤ >>>> would be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was ¤ >>>> wrong. ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over ¤ >>>> every speculative "tipping point"? ¤ >>> ¤ >>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in ¤ >>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are ¤ >>> the best on the table. ¤ >> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference ¤ >> between probability and evidence. ¤ >> ¤ > now i'm the jimp ¤ ¤ Ditch the toque and put on a jimp, hoser. He's never gonna do it without his fez on. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 16:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvv04p.jif.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727183 |
On 2019-02-13 4:50 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q421bq$in3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > > ¤ > ¤ On 2/13/2019 3:50 PM, jimp wrote: > ¤ > On 2019-02-13 1:45 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > ¤ >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > ¤ >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > ¤ >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > ¤ >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > ¤ >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > ¤ >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be > ¤ >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. > ¤ >>>>>> > ¤ >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. > ¤ >>>>>> > ¤ >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? > ¤ >>>>> > ¤ >>>>> Do you even know? > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. > ¤ >>> > ¤ >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for > ¤ >>> you. > ¤ >> > ¤ >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word > ¤ >> "evidence". > ¤ >> > ¤ >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. > ¤ >> > ¤ >>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your > ¤ >>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. > ¤ >> > ¤ >> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. > ¤ >> > ¤ >>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have > ¤ >>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, > ¤ >>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. > ¤ >> > ¤ >> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? > ¤ >> > ¤ >> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case > ¤ >> there will be no more sun rises. > ¤ >> > ¤ >> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. > ¤ >> > ¤ >>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that > ¤ >>>> some speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still > ¤ >>>> speculation. > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we > ¤ >>>> would be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was > ¤ >>>> wrong. > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over > ¤ >>>> every speculative "tipping point"? > ¤ >>> > ¤ >>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in > ¤ >>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are > ¤ >>> the best on the table. > ¤ >> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference > ¤ >> between probability and evidence. > ¤ >> > ¤ > now i'm the jimp > ¤ > ¤ Ditch the toque and put on a jimp, hoser. > > He's never gonna do it without his fez on. > fez's aren't allowed in canada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjfr0FtnkpU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727110 |
On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>> >>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>> >>>> Do you even know? >>> >>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >> >> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >> you. > > No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word > "evidence". Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on solutions to complex problems! > There is a very high probability, but no evidence. How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? Sounds like word salad. >> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. > > The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. Do you have evidence they will not be the same tomorrow? LOL! >> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. Of note you saw this and worked to change the topic. We do have evidence of what is very likely to happen in the future. > Do you understand what the word "probability" means? > > It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case > there will be no more sun rises. > > The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. There is no evidence it will happen tomorrow. >>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>> speculation. >>> >>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>> >>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>> wrong. >>> >>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>> >>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>> every speculative "tipping point"? >> >> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >> the best on the table. > > Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference > between probability and evidence. Did you think they meant the same? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce3805f9b08a6a13de@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #727124 |
In article <gcjfr0FtnkpU3@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>> >>>>> Do you even know? >>>> >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>> >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>> you. >> >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >> "evidence". > >Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will >rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. Not at all, there is a guess and probability. > >Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on >solutions to complex problems! Sop when someone disagrees with you it's "recusal"? > >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. > >How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? >Sounds like word salad. Like the stuff the left spews? > >>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >> >> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. > >Do you have evidence they will not be the same tomorrow? LOL! Nice spin, you recuse yourself. > >>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. > >Of note you saw this and worked to change the topic. We do have evidence >of what is very likely to happen in the future. No, we have guesses, it hasn't happened yet. > >> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >> >> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >> there will be no more sun rises. >> >> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. > >There is no evidence it will happen tomorrow. > >>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>> speculation. >>>> >>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>> >>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>> >>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>> the best on the table. >> >> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >> between probability and evidence. > >Did you think they meant the same?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 14:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gcjgh4Ftv5jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727126 |
On 2/13/19 2:20 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gcjfr0FtnkpU3@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>> >>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>> >>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>> you. >>> >>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>> "evidence". >> >> Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will >> rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. > > Not at all, there is a guess and probability. >> >> Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on >> solutions to complex problems! > > Sop when someone disagrees with you it's "recusal"? >> >>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >> >> How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? >> Sounds like word salad. > > Like the stuff the left spews? >> >>>> I disagree. I bet if you look up what time the sun will rise in your >>>> area, and then find the time when it happens, it will be VERY close. >>> >>> The time of sunrise and the act of sunrise are two different things. >> >> Do you have evidence they will not be the same tomorrow? LOL! > > Nice spin, you recuse yourself. >> >>>> Do this and we can test you idea and mine. I say it IS possible to have >>>> some ideas about the future and have some level of confidence in them, >>>> and to do this based on scientific measurements and calculations. >> >> Of note you saw this and worked to change the topic. We do have evidence >> of what is very likely to happen in the future. > > No, we have guesses, it hasn't happened yet. >> >>> Do you understand what the word "probability" means? >>> >>> It is known that the Sun and the Earth will someday die, in which case >>> there will be no more sun rises. >>> >>> The probablilty that it will happen tomorrow is very, very, low. >> >> There is no evidence it will happen tomorrow. >> >>>>> Everything about the future is speculation and it is irrelevant that some >>>>> speculation is "better" than some other speculation as it is all still >>>>> speculation. >>>>> >>>>> Here's some speculation from James Hansen from 13 years ago that we would >>>>> be in a catastrophe by 3 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Hansen is supposed to be among the best of the speculators yet he was >>>>> wrong. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>> >>>>> Why does it bother you that I am not going into a hysterical panic over >>>>> every speculative "tipping point"? >>>> >>>> As noted: you and Republicans have nothing to bring to the table in >>>> terms of planning for the future. AOC does. Until you do her ideas are >>>> the best on the table. >>> >>> Childish nonsense from someone that doesn't understand the difference >>> between probability and evidence. >> >> Did you think they meant the same? > > You are ignorant of common concepts. Fair enough. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 03:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3d5fjf-s4j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #727124 |
In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>> >>>>> Do you even know? >>>> >>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>> >>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>> you. >> >> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >> "evidence". > > Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will > rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. Learn to read, child. There is a high probablility that the sun will rise tomorrow but zero evidence that it will in fact rise. There is zero evidence for the time of sunrise tomorrow but there is a lot of data that can predict that time to a high degree of accuracy if in fact the sun does rise tomorrow. > Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on > solutions to complex problems! > >> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. > > How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? > Sounds like word salad. That is all you seem capable of posting. If one is going to post to sci.physics, one should learn a little basic science such as what is evidence, what is data and what is probability. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 21:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvveu3.muh.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727250 |
On 2019-02-13 8:54 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>> >>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>> >>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>> you. >>> >>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>> "evidence". >> >> Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will >> rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. > > Learn to read, child. > > There is a high probablility that the sun will rise tomorrow but zero > evidence that it will in fact rise. > > There is zero evidence for the time of sunrise tomorrow but there is > a lot of data that can predict that time to a high degree of accuracy > if in fact the sun does rise tomorrow. > >> Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on >> solutions to complex problems! >> >>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >> >> How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? >> Sounds like word salad. > > That is all you seem capable of posting. > > If one is going to post to sci.physics, one should learn a little basic > science such as what is evidence, what is data and what is probability. > you posted to 3 different groups
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gckb8sF4rd1U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727253 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-02-13 8:54 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>>> >>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>>> you. >>>> >>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>>> "evidence". >>> >>> Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will >>> rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. >> >> Learn to read, child. >> >> There is a high probablility that the sun will rise tomorrow but zero >> evidence that it will in fact rise. >> >> There is zero evidence for the time of sunrise tomorrow but there is >> a lot of data that can predict that time to a high degree of accuracy >> if in fact the sun does rise tomorrow. >> >>> Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on >>> solutions to complex problems! >>> >>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>> >>> How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? >>> Sounds like word salad. >> >> That is all you seem capable of posting. >> >> If one is going to post to sci.physics, one should learn a little basic >> science such as what is evidence, what is data and what is probability. >> > > you posted to 3 different groups > Wow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 05:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <li9fjf-1ij.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #727253 |
In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-02-13 8:54 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>>> >>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>>> you. >>>> >>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>>> "evidence". >>> >>> Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will >>> rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. >> >> Learn to read, child. >> >> There is a high probablility that the sun will rise tomorrow but zero >> evidence that it will in fact rise. >> >> There is zero evidence for the time of sunrise tomorrow but there is >> a lot of data that can predict that time to a high degree of accuracy >> if in fact the sun does rise tomorrow. >> >>> Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on >>> solutions to complex problems! >>> >>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>> >>> How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? >>> Sounds like word salad. >> >> That is all you seem capable of posting. >> >> If one is going to post to sci.physics, one should learn a little basic >> science such as what is evidence, what is data and what is probability. >> > > you posted to 3 different groups Not me, fool, it is you and your puerile little clique that is doing all the idiotic crossposting as you damn well know. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 05:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gckcuqF56rdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #727265 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-02-13 8:54 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 1:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/13/19 11:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Within your child or grandchild's lifetime, the weather may be >>>>>>>>>> dramatically different because of climate change. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or it MAY be not much different than it is now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hat does our best evidence say? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you even know? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no evidence for the future as the future isn't here yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> So no evidence the sun will rise tomorrow, nor the time that it will for >>>>>> you. >>>>> >>>>> No, there is not. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word >>>>> "evidence". >>>> >>>> Wow. You do not think there is ANY evidence of what time the sun will >>>> rise tomorrow or even that it will at all. >>> >>> Learn to read, child. >>> >>> There is a high probablility that the sun will rise tomorrow but zero >>> evidence that it will in fact rise. >>> >>> There is zero evidence for the time of sunrise tomorrow but there is >>> a lot of data that can predict that time to a high degree of accuracy >>> if in fact the sun does rise tomorrow. >>> >>>> Given that it is good you have recused yourself from the discussion on >>>> solutions to complex problems! >>>> >>>>> There is a very high probability, but no evidence. >>>> >>>> How can evidence show a very high probability without being evidence? >>>> Sounds like word salad. >>> >>> That is all you seem capable of posting. >>> >>> If one is going to post to sci.physics, one should learn a little basic >>> science such as what is evidence, what is data and what is probability. >>> >> >> you posted to 3 different groups > > Not me, fool, Who else uses your account? > it is you and your puerile little clique that is doing > all the idiotic crossposting as you damn well know. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q43071$ofq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727265 |
On 2/14/2019 12:05 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Not me, fool, it is you and your puerile little clique that is doing > all the idiotic crossposting as you damn well know. Not at all. Your post complaining about all the "idiotic" crossposting? You crossposted it. Not us. You did. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 00:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cec4b06e734dd09964b8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #727272 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q43071$ofq$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 2/14/2019 12:05 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ > Not me, fool, it is you and your puerile little clique that is doing ¤ > all the idiotic crossposting as you damn well know. ¤ ¤ Not at all. Your post complaining about all the "idiotic" crossposting? ¤ You crossposted it. Not us. You did. Damn him... and his ilk. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web